Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Qualified Contingent Cross Orders, 22682-22685 [2017-09931]
Download as PDF
22682
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 17, 2017 / Notices
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
of such proceedings is appropriate at
this time in view of the legal and policy
issues raised by the proposed rule
change. Institution of proceedings does
not indicate that the Commission has
reached any conclusions with respect to
any of the issues involved. Rather, as
described below, the Commission seeks
and encourages interested persons to
provide comments on the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Act,16 the Commission is providing
notice of the grounds for disapproval
under consideration. The Commission is
instituting proceedings to allow for
additional analysis of the proposal’s
consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act, which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be ‘‘designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade,’’ and ‘‘to
protect investors and the public
interest.’’ 17 As noted above, the
Exchange is submitting this proposed
rule change because the Index for the
Fund does not meet the requirements
set forth in BZX Rule
14.11(c)(4)(B)(i)(b). In the proposal, the
Exchange described certain
characteristics of the Index as of
November 30, 2016,18 and stated its
belief that the Index is sufficiently
broad-based to deter potential
manipulation and that the Index
securities are sufficiently liquid to deter
potential manipulation. However, the
Commission notes that the Exchange
did not provide, for the continued
listing of the Shares, parameters around
the extent to which the Index may
change from those characteristics. The
Commission seeks commenters’ views
on whether the Exchange’s statements
and representations support a
determination that the listing and
trading of the Shares would be
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act, which, among other things,
requires that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, and to protect investors and the
public interest.
IV. Procedure: Request for Written
Comments
The Commission requests that
interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and
arguments with respect to the issues
16 Id.
17 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 See supra Section II.C.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 May 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
identified above, as well as any other
concerns they may have with the
proposal. In particular, the Commission
invites the written views of interested
persons concerning whether the
proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) or any other provision of the Act,
or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Although there do not appear to be any
issues relevant to approval or
disapproval that would be facilitated by
an oral presentation of views, data, and
arguments, the Commission will
consider, pursuant to Rule 19b–4, any
request for an opportunity to make an
oral presentation.19
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the
proposal should be approved or
disapproved by June 7, 2017. Any
person who wishes to file a rebuttal to
any other person’s submission must file
that rebuttal by June 21, 2017. The
Commission asks that commenters
address the sufficiency of the
Exchange’s statements in support of the
proposal, which are set forth in
Amendment No. 1,20 in addition to any
other comments they may wish to
submit about the proposed rule change.
Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BatsBZX–2017–07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR-BatsBZX–2017–07. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
19 Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, as amended by the
Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, Public Law
94–29 (June 4, 1975), grants the Commission
flexibility to determine what type of proceeding—
either oral or notice and opportunity for written
comments—is appropriate for consideration of a
particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Acts Amendments of
1975, Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing & Urban
Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30
(1975).
20 See supra note 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
BatsBZX–2017–07 and should be
submitted on or before June 7, 2017.
Rebuttal comments should be submitted
by June 21, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09932 Filed 5–16–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80661; File No. SR–BOX–
2017–14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
May 11, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 9,
2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 17, 2017 / Notices
comments on the proposed rule from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://
boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange is filing this proposal to
adopt Qualified Contingent Cross
Orders (‘‘QCC Orders’’), as described
below.
Background
The purpose of this filing is to adopt
rules related to QCC Orders. The
proposed rule change is based on the
rules of other options exchanges,
including an International Securities
Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) proposal that was
previously approved by the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’).3
The Exchange is currently a party to
the Options Order Protection and
Locked/Crossed Market Plan (‘‘Linkage
Plan’’), and has implemented Exchange
rules in conjunction with that plan,
which are set forth in Rule 15000 of the
Exchange’s Rules (the ‘‘Linkage Rules’’).
Similar to Regulation NMS under the
Act, the Linkage Plan requires, among
other things, that the Exchange
establish, maintain and enforce written
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63955
(February 24, 2011), 76 FR 11533 (March 2, 2011)
(SR–ISE–2010–73) (‘‘ISE Approval’’); 79942
(February 2, 2017), 82 FR 9804 (February 8, 2017)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
SR–EDGX–2017–11).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 May 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
policies and procedures that are
reasonably designed to prevent ‘‘TradeThroughs.’’ 4 A Trade-Through is a
transaction in an options series at a
price that is inferior to the best price
available in the market.5 The Linkage
Plan replaced the Plan for the Purpose
of Creating and Operating an
Intermarket Option Linkage (‘‘Old
Linkage Plan’’). The Old Linkage Plan
provided a limited Trade-Through
exemption for ‘‘Block Trades,’’ defined
to be trades of 500 or more contracts
with a premium value of at least
$150,000.6 However, as with Regulation
NMS, the Linkage Plan does not provide
a Block Trade exemption. Since its
original adoption by the ISE in 2011,
QCC has been offered by multiple
options exchanges as a limited
substitute for the Block Trade
exemption.7
Proposal Regarding Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders
The purpose of the proposed change
is to provide market participants with
the ability to submit to the Exchange
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders, an
order type offered by multiple other
options exchanges.8 The proposed
operation of Qualified Contingent Cross
Orders on the Exchange is substantially
similar in all material respects to the
operation of such orders on such other
exchanges.
The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule
paragraph (c)(6) to Rule 7110 to govern
the operation of Qualified Contingent
Cross Orders. As proposed, a Qualified
Contingent Cross Order would be an
originating order to buy or sell at least
1,000 standard option contracts, or
10,000 mini-option contracts, that is
identified as being part of a qualified
contingent trade (as that term is
proposed to be defined in IM–7110–2),
coupled with a contra-side order or
orders totaling an equal number of
contracts. As proposed under IM–7110–
2, a ‘‘qualified contingent trade’’ is a
transaction consisting of two or more
component orders, executed as agent or
principal, where: (1) At least one
component is an NMS stock, as defined
in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS under
the Act; (2) all components are effected
with a product or price contingency that
either has been agreed to by all the
Section 5(a) of the Linkage Plan
Section 2(21) of the Linkage Plan
6 See Old Linkage Plan Sections 2(3) and
8(c)(i)(C).
7 See ISE Rule 715(j), Supplementary Material .01
to ISE Rule 715 and ISE Rule 721(b); see also CBOE
Rule 6.53(u); NASDAQ PHLX Rule 1080(o); NYSE
Arca Rule 6.62(bb), Commentary .02 to NYSE Arca
Rule 6.62 and NYSE Arca Rule 6.90.
8 See supra, note 7.
22683
respective counterparties or arranged for
by a broker-dealer as principal or agent;
(3) the execution of one component is
contingent upon the execution of all
other components at or near the same
time; (4) the specific relationship
between the component orders (e.g., the
spread between the prices of the
component orders) is determined by the
time the contingent order is placed; (5)
the component orders bear a derivative
relationship to one another, represent
different classes of shares of the same
issuer, or involve the securities of
participants in mergers or with
intentions to merge that have been
announced or cancelled; and (6) the
transaction is fully hedged (without
regard to any prior existing position) as
a result of other components of the
contingent trade.
Additionally, as proposed, Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders would be
allowed to execute automatically on
entry without exposure provided the
execution: (i) Is not at the same price as
a Public Customer 9 Order on the BOX
Book; 10 and (ii) is at or between the
NBBO.11 As such, the Exchange also
proposes to specify that a Qualified
Contingent Cross Order will be rejected
if there is an ongoing auction (including
PIP, COPIP, Facilitation, and
Solicitation auctions) or an exposed
order on the option series when the
Qualified Contingent Cross Order is
received by the Exchange. The proposed
Rule would also specify that Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders will be
cancelled if they cannot be executed.
Also, pursuant to the proposed rule,
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders may
only be entered in the standard
increments applicable to the options
class under Rule 7050.
The Exchange will track and monitor
QCC Orders to determine which is the
originating side of the order and which
is the contra-side(s) of the order to
ensure that Participants are complying
with the minimum 1,000 contract size
limitation (or 10,000 mini-option
contract minimum) on the originating
side of the QCC Order. The Exchange
will check to see if Participants are
aggregating multiple orders to meet the
1,000 contract minimum on the
originating side (or 10,000 mini-option
contract minimum) of the trade in
violation of the requirements of the rule.
4 See
5 See
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9 The term ‘‘Public Customer’’ means a person
that is not a broker or dealer in securities. See Rule
100(a)(51).
10 The term ‘‘BOX Book’’ means the electronic
book of orders on each single option series
maintained by the BOX Trading Host. See Rule
100(a)(10).
11 The NBBO means the national best bid or offer.
See Rule 100(a)(33).
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
22684
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 17, 2017 / Notices
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
The rule requires that the originating
side of the trade consist of one party
who is submitting a QCC Order for at
least 1,000 contracts (or 10,000 minioption contracts). The Exchange
represents that it will enforce
compliance with this portion of the rule
by checking to see if a Participants
breaks up the originating side of the
order in a post trade allocation to
different clearing firms, allocating less
than 1,000 contracts (or 10,000 minioption contracts) to a party or multiple
parties. For example, a Participant
enters a QCC Order into the system for
1,500 contracts and receives an
execution. Subsequent to the execution,
the Participant allocates the originating
side of the order to two different
clearing firms on a post trade allocation
basis, thereby allocating 500 contracts to
one clearing firm and 1,000 contracts to
another clearing firm. This type of
transaction would not meet the
requirements of a QCC Order under the
current and proposed rule.
With regard to order entry, a
Participant will have to mark the
originating side as the first order in the
system and the contra-side(s) as the
second. The Exchange will monitor
order entries to ensure that Participants
are properly entering QCC Orders into
the system.
The Exchange anticipates
implementing the proposed change
during the second quarter of 2017. The
Exchange will provide notice of the
exact implementation date, via Circular,
prior to implementing the proposed
change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),12 in general, and Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,13 in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, the
proposed change is designed to offer
market participants greater flexibility by
allowing such market participant to
submit QCC Orders to BOX in the same
way they are permitted to send QCC
Orders to other options exchanges,
12 15
13 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 May 16, 2017
thereby promoting just and equitable
principles of trade, fostering
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, removing
impediments to, and perfecting the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system.
The proposed rules are consistent
with the protection of investors in that
they are designed to prevent TradeThroughs. In addition, the proposed
rule change would promote a free and
open market by permitting the Exchange
to compete with other options
exchanges for these types of orders. In
this regard, competition would result in
benefits to the investing public, whereas
a lack of competition would serve to
limit the choices that participants have
for execution of their options business.
As noted above, the proposed operation
of Qualified Contingent Cross Orders on
the Exchange is substantially similar in
all material respects to the operation of
such orders on such other exchanges.14
As such, permitting the Exchange to
operate on an even playing field relative
to other exchanges removes
impediments to and perfects the
mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change to adopt QCC
Orders will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange’s
proposed functionality is open to all
market participants. Further, the
proposed rule will allow the Exchange
to compete with other options
exchanges that currently offer QCC
Orders, thus alleviating the burden on
competition that would arise if such
exchanges were permitted to continue
offering such functionality and the
Exchange was not. For these reasons,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule changes will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act, and believes the
proposed change will enhance
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
(a) This proposed rule change is filed
pursuant to paragraph (A) of section
19(b)(3) of the Exchange Act 15 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.16
(b) This proposed rule change does
not significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on
competition, and, by its terms, does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of the filing, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
The Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule change, prior to the
date of filing the proposed rule change
as required by Rule 19b–4(f)(6).
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change does not
significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest and does
not impose any significant burden on
competition. The Exchange’s proposal
to accept QCC Orders is not a novel
concept but rather, is based on the
acceptance of such orders on multiple
other options exchanges.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2017–14 on the subject line.
15 15
14 See
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
supra, note 7.
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
16 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
17MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 17, 2017 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2017–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m., located at 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of
such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BOX–
2017–14 and should be submitted on or
before June 7, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09931 Filed 5–16–17; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
[Release No. 34–80653; File No. SR–
BatsEDGA–2017–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats
EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:18 May 16, 2017
Jkt 241001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the fee schedule applicable to
Members 5 and non-Members of the
Exchange pursuant to EDGA Rules
15.1(a) and (c).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.bats.com, at the principal office
of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
May 11, 2017.
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 5,
2017, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated the proposed rule change as
one establishing or changing a member
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,4 which renders the
proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fee schedule to: (i) Lower the rate for fee
code RT; and (ii) add the RMPT/RMPL
Tier 2.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted
to membership in the Exchange.’’ See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22685
Fee Code RT
The Exchange proposes to decrease
the fee for orders yielding fee code RT,
which is appended to orders routed
using the ROUT 6 routing strategy, from
$0.00260 to $0.00250 per share for
securities priced at or above $1.00 per
share. The Exchange does not propose
to amend the rate for orders yielding fee
code RT in securities priced below
$1.00 per share.
RMPT/RMPL Tier 2
The Exchange offers one tier under
footnote 4, the RMPT/RMPL Tier under
which a Member receives a discounted
fee of $0.0008 per share for orders
yielding fee codes PT 7 or PX 8 where
that Member adds or removes an ADV 9
greater than or equal to 2,000,000 shares
using the RMPT or RMPL 10 routing
strategy. The Exchange now proposes to
add a new tier under footnote 4 to be
known as Tier 2 under which a Member
would receive a discounted fee of
$0.0006 per share for orders yielding fee
codes PT or PX where that Member adds
or removes an ADV greater than or equal
to 4,000,000 shares using the RMPT or
RMPL routing strategy.11
6 ROUT is a routing strategy that checks the
System for available shares and then are sent to
destinations on the System routing table. See
Exchange Rule 11.11(g)(3)(B). The term ‘‘System
routing table’’ refers to the proprietary process for
determining the specific trading venues to which
the System routes orders and the order in which it
routes them. See Exchange Rule 11.11(g).
7 Fee code PT is appended to orders that remove
liquidity from the Exchange using RMPT or RMPL
routing strategy and is assessed a fee of $0.0010 per
share on securities priced over $1.00, and there is
no fee on securities priced below $1.00. See the
Exchange’s fee schedule available at https://
www.bats.com/us/equities/membership/fee_
schedule/edga/.
8 Fee code PX is append to orders that are routed
using the RMPL routing strategy to a destination not
covered by Fee Code PL, or are routed using the
RMPT routing strategy, and is assessed a fee of
$0.0012 per share on securities priced over $1.00,
and a fee of 30% of the total dollar value on
securities priced below $1.00. Id.
9 ADV is generally defined as average daily
volume calculated as the number of shares added
to, removed from, or routed by, the Exchange, or
any combination or subset thereof, per day. Id.
10 The RMPT routing strategy operates similarly
to RMPL in that under both Mid-Point Peg Orders
check the System for available shares and any
remaining shares are then sent to destinations on
the System routing table that support midpoint
eligible orders. If any shares remain unexecuted
after routing, they are posted on the EDGA Book as
a Mid-Point Peg Order, unless otherwise instructed
by the User. While RMPL and RMPT operate in an
identical manner, the trading venues that each
routing strategy routes to and the order in which it
routes them differ. See Exchange Rule 11.11(g)(13).
11 As a result of the fee schedule layout change
in adding a second tier, the description of which
fee codes are appended with footnote 3 will be
moved above the table similar to the layout of the
table in footnote 4.
E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM
17MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22682-22685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09931]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-80661; File No. SR-BOX-2017-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
May 11, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 9, 2017, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
[[Page 22683]]
comments on the proposed rule from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt Qualified Contingent Cross Orders.
The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal
office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and
also on the Exchange's Internet Web site at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is filing this proposal to adopt Qualified Contingent
Cross Orders (``QCC Orders''), as described below.
Background
The purpose of this filing is to adopt rules related to QCC Orders.
The proposed rule change is based on the rules of other options
exchanges, including an International Securities Exchange (``ISE'')
proposal that was previously approved by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63955 (February 24,
2011), 76 FR 11533 (March 2, 2011) (SR-ISE-2010-73) (``ISE
Approval''); 79942 (February 2, 2017), 82 FR 9804 (February 8, 2017)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of SR-EDGX-2017-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is currently a party to the Options Order Protection
and Locked/Crossed Market Plan (``Linkage Plan''), and has implemented
Exchange rules in conjunction with that plan, which are set forth in
Rule 15000 of the Exchange's Rules (the ``Linkage Rules''). Similar to
Regulation NMS under the Act, the Linkage Plan requires, among other
things, that the Exchange establish, maintain and enforce written
policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent
``Trade-Throughs.'' \4\ A Trade-Through is a transaction in an options
series at a price that is inferior to the best price available in the
market.\5\ The Linkage Plan replaced the Plan for the Purpose of
Creating and Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (``Old Linkage
Plan''). The Old Linkage Plan provided a limited Trade-Through
exemption for ``Block Trades,'' defined to be trades of 500 or more
contracts with a premium value of at least $150,000.\6\ However, as
with Regulation NMS, the Linkage Plan does not provide a Block Trade
exemption. Since its original adoption by the ISE in 2011, QCC has been
offered by multiple options exchanges as a limited substitute for the
Block Trade exemption.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Section 5(a) of the Linkage Plan
\5\ See Section 2(21) of the Linkage Plan
\6\ See Old Linkage Plan Sections 2(3) and 8(c)(i)(C).
\7\ See ISE Rule 715(j), Supplementary Material .01 to ISE Rule
715 and ISE Rule 721(b); see also CBOE Rule 6.53(u); NASDAQ PHLX
Rule 1080(o); NYSE Arca Rule 6.62(bb), Commentary .02 to NYSE Arca
Rule 6.62 and NYSE Arca Rule 6.90.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal Regarding Qualified Contingent Cross Orders
The purpose of the proposed change is to provide market
participants with the ability to submit to the Exchange Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders, an order type offered by multiple other
options exchanges.\8\ The proposed operation of Qualified Contingent
Cross Orders on the Exchange is substantially similar in all material
respects to the operation of such orders on such other exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See supra, note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule paragraph (c)(6) to Rule 7110
to govern the operation of Qualified Contingent Cross Orders. As
proposed, a Qualified Contingent Cross Order would be an originating
order to buy or sell at least 1,000 standard option contracts, or
10,000 mini-option contracts, that is identified as being part of a
qualified contingent trade (as that term is proposed to be defined in
IM-7110-2), coupled with a contra-side order or orders totaling an
equal number of contracts. As proposed under IM-7110-2, a ``qualified
contingent trade'' is a transaction consisting of two or more component
orders, executed as agent or principal, where: (1) At least one
component is an NMS stock, as defined in Rule 600 of Regulation NMS
under the Act; (2) all components are effected with a product or price
contingency that either has been agreed to by all the respective
counterparties or arranged for by a broker-dealer as principal or
agent; (3) the execution of one component is contingent upon the
execution of all other components at or near the same time; (4) the
specific relationship between the component orders (e.g., the spread
between the prices of the component orders) is determined by the time
the contingent order is placed; (5) the component orders bear a
derivative relationship to one another, represent different classes of
shares of the same issuer, or involve the securities of participants in
mergers or with intentions to merge that have been announced or
cancelled; and (6) the transaction is fully hedged (without regard to
any prior existing position) as a result of other components of the
contingent trade.
Additionally, as proposed, Qualified Contingent Cross Orders would
be allowed to execute automatically on entry without exposure provided
the execution: (i) Is not at the same price as a Public Customer \9\
Order on the BOX Book; \10\ and (ii) is at or between the NBBO.\11\ As
such, the Exchange also proposes to specify that a Qualified Contingent
Cross Order will be rejected if there is an ongoing auction (including
PIP, COPIP, Facilitation, and Solicitation auctions) or an exposed
order on the option series when the Qualified Contingent Cross Order is
received by the Exchange. The proposed Rule would also specify that
Qualified Contingent Cross Orders will be cancelled if they cannot be
executed. Also, pursuant to the proposed rule, Qualified Contingent
Cross Orders may only be entered in the standard increments applicable
to the options class under Rule 7050.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The term ``Public Customer'' means a person that is not a
broker or dealer in securities. See Rule 100(a)(51).
\10\ The term ``BOX Book'' means the electronic book of orders
on each single option series maintained by the BOX Trading Host. See
Rule 100(a)(10).
\11\ The NBBO means the national best bid or offer. See Rule
100(a)(33).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange will track and monitor QCC Orders to determine which
is the originating side of the order and which is the contra-side(s) of
the order to ensure that Participants are complying with the minimum
1,000 contract size limitation (or 10,000 mini-option contract minimum)
on the originating side of the QCC Order. The Exchange will check to
see if Participants are aggregating multiple orders to meet the 1,000
contract minimum on the originating side (or 10,000 mini-option
contract minimum) of the trade in violation of the requirements of the
rule.
[[Page 22684]]
The rule requires that the originating side of the trade consist of one
party who is submitting a QCC Order for at least 1,000 contracts (or
10,000 mini-option contracts). The Exchange represents that it will
enforce compliance with this portion of the rule by checking to see if
a Participants breaks up the originating side of the order in a post
trade allocation to different clearing firms, allocating less than
1,000 contracts (or 10,000 mini-option contracts) to a party or
multiple parties. For example, a Participant enters a QCC Order into
the system for 1,500 contracts and receives an execution. Subsequent to
the execution, the Participant allocates the originating side of the
order to two different clearing firms on a post trade allocation basis,
thereby allocating 500 contracts to one clearing firm and 1,000
contracts to another clearing firm. This type of transaction would not
meet the requirements of a QCC Order under the current and proposed
rule.
With regard to order entry, a Participant will have to mark the
originating side as the first order in the system and the contra-
side(s) as the second. The Exchange will monitor order entries to
ensure that Participants are properly entering QCC Orders into the
system.
The Exchange anticipates implementing the proposed change during
the second quarter of 2017. The Exchange will provide notice of the
exact implementation date, via Circular, prior to implementing the
proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\12\ in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest. Specifically, the proposed change is designed to offer
market participants greater flexibility by allowing such market
participant to submit QCC Orders to BOX in the same way they are
permitted to send QCC Orders to other options exchanges, thereby
promoting just and equitable principles of trade, fostering cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, removing impediments to, and perfecting the mechanism of, a
free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rules are consistent with the protection of investors
in that they are designed to prevent Trade-Throughs. In addition, the
proposed rule change would promote a free and open market by permitting
the Exchange to compete with other options exchanges for these types of
orders. In this regard, competition would result in benefits to the
investing public, whereas a lack of competition would serve to limit
the choices that participants have for execution of their options
business. As noted above, the proposed operation of Qualified
Contingent Cross Orders on the Exchange is substantially similar in all
material respects to the operation of such orders on such other
exchanges.\14\ As such, permitting the Exchange to operate on an even
playing field relative to other exchanges removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra, note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change to
adopt QCC Orders will impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange's proposed functionality is open to all market participants.
Further, the proposed rule will allow the Exchange to compete with
other options exchanges that currently offer QCC Orders, thus
alleviating the burden on competition that would arise if such
exchanges were permitted to continue offering such functionality and
the Exchange was not. For these reasons, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden on competition
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
and believes the proposed change will enhance competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
(a) This proposed rule change is filed pursuant to paragraph (A) of
section 19(b)(3) of the Exchange Act \15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) This proposed rule change does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any
significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.
The Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description
and text of the proposed rule change, prior to the date of filing the
proposed rule change as required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6).
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest
and does not impose any significant burden on competition. The
Exchange's proposal to accept QCC Orders is not a novel concept but
rather, is based on the acceptance of such orders on multiple other
options exchanges.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2017-14 on the subject line.
[[Page 22685]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2017-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., located at
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-
2017-14 and should be submitted on or before June 7, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09931 Filed 5-16-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P