Applications for New Awards; Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program, 22523-22531 [2017-09896]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Written
Application for the Independent Living
Services for Older Individuals Who are
Blind Formula Grant.
OMB Control Number: 1820–0660.
Type of Review: An extension of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local, and Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 56.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 9.
Abstract: This document is used by
States to request funds to administer the
Independent Living Services for Older
Individuals Who are Blind (IL–OIB)
program. The IL–OIB is provided for
under Title VII, Chapter 2 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(Act) to assist individuals who are age
55 or older whose significant visual
impairment makes competitive
employment extremely difficult to attain
but for whom independent living goals
are feasible.
Dated: May 10, 2017.
Tomakie Washington,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Office of the Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2017–09828 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Striving
Readers Comprehensive Literacy
Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
is issuing a notice inviting applications
for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2017
for Striving Readers Comprehensive
Literacy Programs, Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number
84.371C.
SUMMARY:
Applications Available: May 16,
2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 17, 2017.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: September 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Savage, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
room 3E237, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. Telephone: (202) 453–5998 or by
email: OESE.SRCL@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Striving
Readers Comprehensive Literacy (SRCL)
Program awards competitive grants to
advance literacy skills, including preliteracy skills, reading, and writing, for
children from birth through grade 12,
with an emphasis on disadvantaged
children, including children living in
poverty, English learners, and children
with disabilities.
Priorities: These priorities are from
the notice of final priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection
criteria for this program, published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register (NFP).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2017 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards based on the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Interventions and Practices Supported
by Moderate or Strong Evidence.
Under this priority, a State
educational agency (SEA) must ensure
that evidence plays a central role in the
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22523
SRCL subgrants. Specifically, in its
high-quality plan, an SEA must assure
that (1) it will use an independent peer
review process to prioritize awards to
eligible subgrantees that propose highquality comprehensive literacy
instruction programs that are supported
by moderate evidence or strong
evidence, where evidence is applicable
and available, and (2) the
comprehensive literacy instruction
program proposed by eligible
subgrantees will align with the State’s
comprehensive literacy plan as well as
local needs.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2017 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to
an additional five points to an
application for each competitive
preference priority, depending on how
well the application meets one or more
of these priorities.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1—
Serving Disadvantaged Children.
Under this priority, an SEA must
describe in its application a high-quality
plan to award subgrants that will serve
the greatest numbers or percentages of
disadvantaged children, including
children living in poverty, English
learners, and children with disabilities.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
Alignment within a Birth through Fifth
Grade Continuum.
Under this priority, an SEA must
describe in its application a high-quality
plan to align, through a progression of
approaches appropriate for each age
group, early language and literacy
projects supported by this grant that
serve children from birth to age five
with programs and systems that serve
students in kindergarten through grade
five to improve school readiness and
transitions for children across this
continuum.
Requirements: The State Funding
Allocations requirement is from Title III
of Division H of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114–
113). The rest of these requirements are
from the NFP.
State Funding Allocations.
Grantees must—
(1) Subgrant no less than 95 percent
of funds received under this
competition to eligible subgrantees;
(2) Ensure that at least—
(a) 15 percent of the subgranted funds
serve children from birth through age
five;
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
22524
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
(b) 40 percent of the subgranted funds
serve students in kindergarten through
grade five; and
(c) 40 percent of the subgranted funds
serve students in middle and high
school, including an equitable
distribution of funds between middle
and high schools.
State Comprehensive Literacy Plan.
To be considered for an award under
this program, an SEA must submit a
new or revised State comprehensive
literacy plan that is informed by a recent
(conducted in the past five years) and
comprehensive needs assessment
developed with the assistance of its
State literacy team. Additionally, the
plan must be reviewed by the State
literacy team and updated annually if an
SEA receives an award under this
program.
Local Literacy Plan.
Grantees must ensure that they will
only fund subgrantees that submit a
local literacy plan that: (1) is informed
by a comprehensive needs assessment
and that is aligned with the State
comprehensive literacy plan; (2)
provides for professional development;
(3) includes interventions and practices
that are supported by moderate
evidence or strong evidence, where
evidence is applicable and available;
and (4) includes a plan to track
children’s outcomes consistent with all
applicable privacy requirements.
Prioritization of Subgrants.
In selecting among eligible
subgrantees, an SEA must give priority
to eligible subgrantees serving greater
numbers or percentages of
disadvantaged children.
Continuous Program Improvement.
Grantees must use data, including the
results of monitoring and evaluations
and other administrative data, to inform
the program’s continuous improvement
and decisionmaking, to improve
program participant outcomes, and to
ensure that disadvantaged children are
served. Additionally, grantees must
ensure that subgrantees, educators,
families, and other key stakeholders
receive the results of the evaluations
conducted on the effectiveness of the
program in a timely fashion, consistent
with all applicable Federal, State, and
other privacy requirements.
Supplement not Supplant.
Grantees must use funds under this
program to supplement, and not
supplant, any non-Federal funds that
would be used to advance literacy skills
for children from birth through grade
12.
Cooperation with National
Evaluation.
Applicants must assure they will only
fund subgrantees that provide a written
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
assurance to cooperate with a national
evaluation of the SRCL program. This
may include adhering to the results of
a random assignment process (e.g.,
lottery) to select schools or early
learning providers that will receive
SRCL funds as well as agreeing to
implement the literacy interventions
proposed to be funded under SRCL only
in schools or early learning providers
that will receive SRCL funds.
Definitions: The definition of ‘‘child
with a disability’’ is from the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The
rest of these definitions are from the
NFP.
Child with a disability has the same
meaning given that term in section 602
of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act.1
Comprehensive literacy instruction
means instruction that—
(a) Includes developmentally
appropriate, contextually explicit, and
systematic instruction, and frequent
practice, in reading and writing across
content areas;
(b) Includes age-appropriate, explicit,
systematic, and intentional instruction
in phonological awareness, phonic
decoding, vocabulary, language
structure, reading fluency, and reading
comprehension;
(c) Includes age-appropriate, explicit
instruction in writing, including
opportunities for children to write with
clear purposes, with critical reasoning
appropriate to the topic and purpose,
and with specific instruction and
feedback from instructional staff;
(d) Makes available and uses diverse,
high-quality print materials that reflect
the reading and development levels, and
interests, of children;
(e) Uses differentiated instructional
approaches, including individual and
small group instruction and discussion;
(f) Provides opportunities for children
to use language with peers and adults in
order to develop language skills,
including developing vocabulary;
(g) Includes frequent practice of
reading and writing strategies;
(h) Uses age-appropriate, valid, and
reliable screening assessments,
diagnostic assessments, formative
assessment processes, and summative
assessments to identify a child’s
learning needs, to inform instruction,
and to monitor the child’s progress and
the effects of instruction;
(i) Uses strategies to enhance
children’s motivation to read and write
1 Child with a disability has the same meaning in
the ESEA, as amended by NCLB, and in the ESEA,
as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act
(ESSA).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and children’s engagement in selfdirected learning;
(j) Incorporates the principles of
universal design for learning;
(k) Depends on teachers’ collaboration
in planning, instruction, and assessing a
child’s progress and on continuous
professional learning; and
(l) Links literacy instruction to the
State’s challenging academic standards,
including standards relating to the
ability to navigate, understand, and
write about complex subject matters in
print and digital formats.
Disadvantaged child means a child
from birth to grade 12 who is at risk of
educational failure or otherwise in need
of special assistance and support,
including a child living in poverty, a
child with a disability, or a child who
is an English learner. This term also
includes infants and toddlers with
developmental delays or a child who is
far below grade level, who has left
school before receiving a regular high
school diploma, who is at risk of not
graduating with a diploma on time, who
is homeless, who is in foster care, or
who has been incarcerated.
Eligible subgrantee means one or
more LEAs or, in the case of early
literacy, one or more LEAs or nonprofit
providers of early childhood education,
with a demonstrated record of
effectiveness in improving language and
early literacy development of children
from birth through age five and in
providing professional development in
language and early literacy
development.
English learner means an individual—
(a) Who is aged 3 through 21;
(b) Who is enrolled or preparing to
enroll in an elementary school or
secondary school;
(c)(i) Who was not born in the United
States or whose native language is a
language other than English;
(ii)(I) Who is a Native American or
Alaska Native, or a native resident of the
outlying areas; and
(II) Who comes from an environment
where a language other than English has
had a significant impact on the
individual’s level of English language
proficiency; or
(iii) Who is migratory, whose native
language is a language other than
English, and who comes from an
environment where a language other
than English is dominant; and
(d) Whose difficulties in speaking,
reading, writing, or understanding the
English language may be sufficient to
deny the individual—
(i) The ability to meet the challenging
State academic standards;
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
(ii) The ability to successfully achieve
in classrooms where the language of
instruction is English; or
(iii) The opportunity to participate
fully in society.
Evidence-based, when used with
respect to a State, local educational
agency, or school activity, means an
activity, strategy, or intervention that—
(a) Demonstrates a statistically
significant effect on improving student
outcomes or other relevant outcomes
based on—
(i) Strong evidence from at least one
well-designed and well-implemented
experimental study;
(ii) Moderate evidence from at least
one well-designed and wellimplemented quasi-experimental study;
or
(iii) Promising evidence from at least
one well-designed and wellimplemented correlational study with
statistical controls for selection bias; or
(b)(i) Demonstrates a rationale based
on high-quality research findings or
positive evaluation that such activity,
strategy, or intervention is likely to
improve student outcomes or other
relevant outcomes; and
(ii) Includes ongoing efforts to
examine the effects of such activity,
strategy or intervention.
High-quality plan means any plan
developed by the SEA that is feasible
and has a high probability of successful
implementation and, at a minimum,
includes—
(a) The key goals of the plan;
(b) The key activities to be undertaken
and the rationale for how the activities
support the key goals;
(c) A realistic timeline, including key
milestones, for implementing each key
activity;
(d) The party or parties responsible
for implementing each activity and
other key personnel assigned to each
activity;
(e) A strong theory, including a
rationale for the plan and a
corresponding logic model as defined in
34 CFR 77.1;
(f) Performance measures at the State
and local levels; and
(g) Appropriate financial resources to
support successful implementation of
the plan.
Independent peer review means a
high-quality, transparent review process
informed by outside individuals with
expertise in literacy development and
education for children from birth
through grade 12.
Moderate evidence means a
statistically significant effect on
improving student outcomes or other
relevant outcomes based on at least one
well-designed and well-implemented
quasi-experimental study.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
Professional development means
activities that—
(a) Are an integral part of school and
LEA strategies for providing educators
(including teachers, principals, other
school leaders, specialized instructional
support personnel, paraprofessionals,
and, as applicable, early childhood
educators) with the knowledge and
skills necessary to enable students to
succeed in a well-rounded education
and to meet the State’s challenging
academic standards;
(b) Are sustained (not stand-alone,
one-day, or short term workshops),
intensive, collaborative, job-embedded,
data-driven, and classroom-focused; and
(c) May include activities that—
(1) Improve and increase teachers’—
(i) Knowledge of the academic
subjects the teachers teach;
(ii) Understanding of how students
learn; or
(iii) Ability to analyze student work
and achievement from multiple sources,
including how to adjust instructional
strategies, assessments, and materials
based on such analysis;
(2) Are an integral part of broad
schoolwide and districtwide
educational improvement plans;
(3) Allow personalized plans for each
educator to address the educator’s
specific needs identified in observation
or other feedback;
(4) Improve classroom management
skills;
(5) Support the recruitment, hiring,
and training of effective teachers,
including teachers who became certified
through State and local alternative
routes to certification;
(6) Advance teacher understanding
of—
(i) Effective instructional strategies
that are evidence-based; or
(ii) Strategies for improving student
academic achievement or substantially
increasing the knowledge and teaching
skills of teachers;
(7) Are aligned with, and directly
related to, academic goals of the school
or LEA;
(8) Are developed with extensive
participation of teachers, principals,
other school leaders, parents,
representatives of Indian Tribes (as
applicable), and administrators of
schools to be served under this program;
(9) Are designed to give teachers of
English learners, and other teachers and
instructional staff, the knowledge and
skills to provide instruction and
appropriate language and academic
support services to those children,
including the appropriate use of
curricula and assessments;
(10) To the extent appropriate,
provide training for teachers, principals,
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22525
and other school and community-based
early childhood program leaders in the
use of technology (including education
about the harms of copyright piracy), so
that technology and technology
applications are effectively used in the
classroom to improve teaching and
learning in the curricula and academic
subjects in which the teachers teach;
(11) As a whole, are regularly
evaluated for their impact on teacher
effectiveness and student academic
achievement, with the findings of the
evaluations used to improve the quality
of professional development;
(12) Are designed to give teachers of
children with disabilities or children
with developmental delays, and other
teachers and instructional staff, the
knowledge and skills to provide
instruction and academic support
services to those children, including
positive behavioral interventions and
supports, multi-tier system of supports,
and use of accommodations;
(13) Provide instruction in the use of
data and assessments to inform
classroom practice;
(14) Provide instruction in ways that
teachers, principals, other school
leaders, specialized instructional
support personnel, and school
administrators may work more
effectively with parents and families;
(15) Involve the forming of
partnerships with institutions of higher
education, including, as applicable,
Tribal Colleges and Universities as
defined in section 316(b) of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended (20
U.S.C. 1059c(b)), to establish schoolbased teacher, principal, and other
school leader training programs that
provide prospective teachers, novice
teachers, principals, and other school
leaders with an opportunity to work
under the guidance of experienced
teachers, principals, other school
leaders, and faculty of such institutions;
(16) Create programs to enable
paraprofessionals (assisting teachers
employed by an LEA receiving
assistance under part A of title I) to
obtain the education necessary for those
paraprofessionals to become certified
and licensed teachers;
(17) Provide follow-up training to
teachers who have participated in
activities described in this paragraph (c)
that are designed to ensure that the
knowledge and skills learned by the
teachers are implemented in the
classroom; or
(18) Where practicable, provide for
school staff and other early childhood
education program providers to address
jointly the transition to elementary
school, including issues related to
school readiness.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
22526
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
State comprehensive literacy plan
means a plan that addresses the preliteracy and literacy needs of children
from birth through grade 12, with
special emphasis on disadvantaged
children. A State comprehensive
literacy plan is informed by a recent
(conducted in the past five years)
comprehensive needs assessment; aligns
policies, resources, and practices;
contains clear instructional goals; sets
high expectations for all children and
subgroups of children; and provides for
professional development for all
teachers in effective literacy instruction.
State literacy team means a team
comprised of individuals with expertise
in literacy development and education
for children from birth through grade
12. The State literacy team must include
individuals with expertise in the
following areas:
(a) Implementing literacy
development practices and instruction
for children in the following age/grade
levels: Birth through age five,
kindergarten through grade 5, grades 6
through 8, and grades 9 through 12;
(b) Managing and implementing
literacy programs that are supported by
strong evidence or moderate evidence;
(c) Evaluating comprehensive literacy
instruction programs;
(d) Planning for and implementing
effective literacy interventions and
practices, particularly for disadvantaged
children, children living in poverty,
struggling readers, English learners, and
children with disabilities;
(e) Implementing assessments in the
areas of phonological awareness, word
recognition, phonics, vocabulary,
comprehension, fluency, and writing;
and
(f) Implementing professional
development on literacy development
and instruction.
A literacy team member may have
expertise in more than one area. Team
members may also include, but are not
limited to: Library/media specialists;
parents; literacy coaches; instructors of
adult education; representatives of
community-based organizations
providing educational services to
disadvantaged children and families;
family literacy service providers;
representatives from local or State
school boards; and representatives from
related child services agencies.
Strong evidence means a statistically
significant effect on improving student
outcomes or other relevant outcomes
based on at least one well-designed and
well-implemented experimental study.
Universal design for learning, as
defined under section 103 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
means a scientifically valid framework
for guiding educational practice that—
(a) Provides flexibility in the ways
information is presented, in the ways
students respond or demonstrate
knowledge and skills, and in the ways
students are engaged; and
(b) Reduces barriers in instruction,
provides appropriate accommodations,
supports, and challenges, and maintains
high achievement expectations for all
students, including students with
disabilities and students who are
limited English proficient.2
Program Authority: Section 1502 of the
ESEA, as amended by the NCLB, and Title III
of Division H of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114–113).3
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98,
and 99. (b) The OMB Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
NFP.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$190,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$3,000,000—$80,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$18,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5—10.
The Department may make awards
2 English learner and limited English proficient
have the same meaning.
3 Title III of Division H of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016 (Pub L. 114–113)
appropriated funds for the SRCL program under
section 1502 of the ESEA, as amended by the NCLB.
As such, the upcoming SRCL competition will be
conducted under that authority. The Department
notes that the ESEA, as amended in December 2015
by the ESSA, authorizes the Comprehensive
Literacy State Development (CLSD) program, a
program that is substantively similar to SRCL. See
sections 2221–2224 of the ESEA, as amended by the
ESSA. To provide for the orderly transition to
future programs under the ESSA, the priorities,
requirements, definitions, and selection criteria that
apply to the SRCL program through this notice
align, to the extent possible, with certain new
statutory requirements that will apply to the CLSD
program.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under this competition for the complete
three-year (36-month) project period
using FY 2016 and FY 2017 funds.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs of the 50
States, the District of Columbia, and
Puerto Rico (referred to in this notice as
State).
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: As
specified under Requirements, this
program involves supplement-notsupplant funding requirements.
3. Eligible Subgrantees: (a) Under 34
CFR 75.708(b) and (c) a grantee may
award subgrants—to directly carry out
project activities described in its
application—to the following types of
entities: One or more LEAs or, in the
case of early literacy, one or more LEAs
or nonprofit providers of early
childhood education, with a
demonstrated record of effectiveness in
improving language and early literacy
development of children from birth
through age five and in providing
professional development in language
and early literacy development.
(b) The grantee may award subgrants
to entities it selects through a
competition under procedures
established by the grantee.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: You can obtain an application
package via the internet, from the
Education Publications Center (ED
Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the internet, use
the following address:
ww.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write,
fax, or call: ED Pubs, U.S. Department
of Education, P.O. Box 22207,
Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll
free: 1–877–433–7827. FAX: (703) 605–
6794. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call, toll free: 1–877–
576–7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its
email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program as follows: CFDA number
84.371C.
To obtain a copy from the program
office, contact: Cindy Savage, U.S.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., room 3E237, Washington,
DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453–5998
or by email: OESE.SRCL@ed.gov. If you
use a TDD or TTY, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission:
Page Limit: The application narrative
is where you, the applicant, address the
selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We
recommend that you: (1) Limit the
application narrative to no more than 50
pages, and (2) use the following
standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ × 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, or the
letters of support. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative, which
includes responses to the priorities and
selection criteria.
Requirements concerning the content
and form of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
competition.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: May 16, 2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 17, 2017.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
Other Submission Requirements in
section IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact either person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. If the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: September 13, 2017.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award
Management: To do business with the
Department of Education (Department),
you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM), the Government’s
primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information
while your application is under review
by the Department and, if you are
awarded a grant, during the project
period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet at the following
Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/
webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow two to five weeks for your
TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take
approximately seven business days, but
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22527
may take upwards of several weeks,
depending on the completeness and
accuracy of the data you enter into the
SAM database. Thus, if you think you
might want to apply for Federal
financial assistance under a program
administered by the Department, please
allow sufficient time to obtain and
register your DUNS number and TIN.
We strongly recommend that you
register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active,
it may be 24 to 48 hours before you can
access the information in, and submit an
application through, Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with
SAM, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your registration
annually. This may take three or more
business days.
Information about SAM is available at
www.SAM.gov. To further assist you
with obtaining and registering your
DUNS number and TIN in SAM or
updating your existing SAM account,
we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet,
which you can find at: https://
www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/samfaqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements.
Applications for grants under this
competition must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under the
SRCL program, CFDA 84.371C, must be
submitted electronically using the
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site,
you will be able to download a copy of
the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not email an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
22528
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the SRCL program at
www.Grants.gov. You must search for
the downloadable application package
for this competition by the CFDA
number. Do not include the CFDA
number’s alpha suffix in your search
(e.g., search for 84.371, not 84.371C).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by
Grants.gov are date and time stamped.
Your application must be fully
uploaded and submitted and must be
date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will
not accept your application if it is
received—that is, date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system—after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. We do
not consider an application that does
not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this competition
to ensure that you submit your
application in a timely manner to the
Grants.gov system. You can also find the
Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News
and Events on the Department’s G5
system home page at www.G5.gov. In
addition, for specific guidance and
procedures for submitting an
application through Grants.gov, please
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
refer to the Grants.gov Web site at:
www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/
apply-for-grants.html.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: the Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• You must upload any narrative
sections and all other attachments to
your application as files in a read-only,
flattened Portable Document Format
(PDF), meaning any fillable PDF
documents must be saved as flattened
non-fillable files. Therefore, do not
upload an interactive or fillable PDF
file. If you upload a file type other than
a read-only, flattened PDF (e.g., Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a
password-protected file, we will not
review that material. Please note that
this could result in your application not
being considered for funding because
the material in question—for example,
the application narrative—is critical to a
meaningful review of your proposal. For
that reason, it is important to allow
yourself adequate time to upload all
material as PDF files. The Department
will not convert material from other
formats to PDF. There is no need to
password protect a file in order to meet
the requirement to submit a read-only
flattened PDF. And, as noted above, the
Department will not review passwordprotected files. Additional, detailed
information on how to attach files is in
the application instructions.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by
email if your application met all the
Grants.gov validation requirements or if
there were any errors (such as
submission of your application by
someone other than a registered
Authorized Organization
Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that
contains special characters). You will be
given an opportunity to correct any
errors and resubmit, but you must still
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
meet the deadline for submission of
applications.
Once your application is successfully
validated by Grants.gov, the Department
will retrieve your application from
Grants.gov and send you an email with
a unique PR/Award number for your
application.
These emails do not mean that your
application is without any disqualifying
errors. While your application may have
been successfully validated by
Grants.gov, it must also meet the
Department’s application requirements
as specified in this notice and in the
application instructions. Disqualifying
errors could include, for instance,
failure to upload attachments in a readonly, flattened PDF; failure to submit a
required part of the application; or
failure to meet applicant eligibility
requirements. It is your responsibility to
ensure that your submitted application
has met all of the Department’s
requirements.
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and
provide an explanation of the technical
problem you experienced with
Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov
Support Desk Case Number. We will
accept your application if we can
confirm that a technical problem
occurred with the Grants.gov system
and that the problem affected your
ability to submit your application by
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. We will
contact you after we determine whether
your application will be accepted.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
• You do not have access to the
internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system;
and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Cindy Savage, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 3E237, Washington,
DC 20202. FAX: (202) 260–8969.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand-delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.371C, LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
We will not consider applications
postmarked after the application
deadline date.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.371C, 550 12th Street
SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from the
NFP and 34 CFR 75.210, and are as
follows:
(a) State-level activities (30 points).
To determine the quality of the
applicant’s State-level activities, the
Secretary considers—
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22529
(1) The extent to which the SEA will
support and provide technical
assistance to its SRCL program
subgrantees to ensure they implement a
high-quality comprehensive literacy
instruction program that will improve
student achievement, including
technical assistance on identifying and
implementing with fidelity
interventions and practices that are
supported by moderate evidence or
strong evidence and align with local
needs; and
(2) The extent to which the SEA will
collect data and other information to
inform the continuous improvement,
and evaluate the effectiveness and
impact, of local projects.
(b) SEA plan for subgrants (20 points).
To determine the quality of the
applicant’s SEA plan for subgrants, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
the SEA has a high-quality plan to use
an independent peer review process to
award subgrants that propose a highquality comprehensive literacy
instruction program, including—
(1) A plan to prioritize projects that
will use interventions and practices that
are supported by moderate evidence or
strong evidence; and
(2) A process to determine—
(i) The extent to which the
intervention or practice is supported by
moderate evidence or strong evidence;
(ii) The alignment of the local project
to the State’s comprehensive literacy
plan and the local literacy plan;
(iii) The extent to which the
interventions and practices are
differentiated and are appropriate for
children from birth through age five and
children in kindergarten through grade
5; and
(iv) The relevance of cited studies to
the project proposed and identified
needs.
(c) SEA monitoring plan (30 points).
To determine the quality of the
applicant’s SEA monitoring plan, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
the SEA describes a high-quality plan
for monitoring local projects, including
how it will ensure that—
(1) The interventions and practices
that are part of the comprehensive
literacy instruction program are aligned
with the SEA’s State comprehensive
literacy plan;
(2) The interventions and practices
that subgrantees implement are
supported by moderate evidence or
strong evidence, to the extent
appropriate and available;
(3) The interventions and practices
are differentiated and are appropriate
for children from birth through age five
and children in kindergarten through
grade 5; and
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
22530
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
(4) The interventions and practices
are implemented with fidelity and
aligned with the SEA’s State
comprehensive literacy plan and local
literacy plan.
(d) Alignment of resources (10 points).
To determine the quality of the
applicant’s alignment of resources, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
the SEA will:
(1) Target subgrants supporting
projects that will improve instruction
for the greatest numbers or percentages
of disadvantaged children; and
(2) Award subgrants of sufficient size
to fully and effectively implement the
local plan while also ensuring that at
least—
(a) 15 percent of the subgranted funds
serve children from birth through age
five;
(b) 40 percent of the subgranted funds
serve students in kindergarten through
grade five; and
(c) 40 percent of the subgranted funds
serve students in middle and high
school, through grade 12, including an
equitable distribution of funds between
middle and high schools.
(e) Adequacy of resources (25 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy
of resources for the proposed project. In
determining the adequacy of resources
for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the objectives,
design, and potential significance of the
proposed project; and
(2) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the number of
persons to be served and to the
anticipated results and benefits.
(f) Quality of the project design (5
points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the project design. In determining the
quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
extent to which the proposed project is
designed to build capacity and yield
results that will extend beyond the
period of Federal financial assistance.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Special
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this program the Department conducts a
review of the risks posed by applicants.
Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may
impose special conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or
grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management
system that does not meet the standards
in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $150,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through SAM. You may
review and comment on any
information about yourself that a
Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
4. Performance Measures: The
Department has established the
following Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 performance
measures for the SRCL program:
(1) The percentage of participating
four-year-old children who achieve
significant gains in oral language skills.
(2) The percentage of participating
fifth-grade students who meet or exceed
proficiency on State reading/language
arts assessments under section
1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as
amended by the ESSA.
(3) The percentage of participating
eighth-grade students who meet or
exceed proficiency on State reading/
language arts assessments under section
1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as
amended by the ESSA.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
(4) The percentage of participating
high school students who meet or
exceed proficiency on State reading/
language arts assessments under section
1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as
amended by the ESSA.
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicator of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise
an applicant for a grant under this
program to give careful consideration to
these measures in conceptualizing the
approach and evaluation for its
proposed project. Each grantee will be
required to provide, in its annual
performance and final reports, data
about its progress in meeting these
measures.
5. Continuation Awards: Grants
awarded under this competition may be
for a project period of up to three years.
The Department will either award
grantees their entire three-year award at
the time of the initial award, or will
award grantees only the first-year
portion of their award. If the
Department awards grantees only the
first-year portion of their award,
depending on the availability of funds,
the Department will make continuation
awards for years two and three in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.253. In
making a continuation award under 34
CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers,
among other things: whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in
achieving the goals and objectives of the
project; whether the grantee has
expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application
and budget; and, if the Secretary has
established performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to either program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or PDF. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: May 11, 2017.
Jason Botel,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2017–09896 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2017–ICCD–0027]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request; G5
System Post Award Budget Drawdown
e-Form
Office of Innovation and
Improvement (OII), Department of
Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 15,
2017.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2017–ICCD–0027. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22531
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
226–62, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Terpak Kelly,
202–205–5231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: G5 System Post
Award Budget Drawdown e-Form.
OMB Control Number: 1855–0028.
Type of Review: A revision of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
Sector; State, Local, and Tribal
Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 30,496.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 30,496.
Abstract: In response to grant
monitors need for a better reporting
mechanism for grantee budgets, the G5
team developed a new electronic budget
form for grantees to complete. This new
electronic form requires grantees to
detail the budget categories from which
they are expending funds in order for
Department grant monitors to track
more carefully the drawdowns and
financial management systems of
grantees. Although this form may be
used by all grantees, at this time only
grantees on cost reimbursement or route
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22523-22531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09896]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Striving Readers Comprehensive
Literacy Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2017 for Striving
Readers Comprehensive Literacy Programs, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.371C.
DATES: Applications Available: May 16, 2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 17, 2017.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Savage, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., room 3E237, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 453-5998 or by email: OESE.SRCL@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy
(SRCL) Program awards competitive grants to advance literacy skills,
including pre-literacy skills, reading, and writing, for children from
birth through grade 12, with an emphasis on disadvantaged children,
including children living in poverty, English learners, and children
with disabilities.
Priorities: These priorities are from the notice of final
priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for this
program, published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register
(NFP).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2017 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards based on the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Interventions and Practices Supported by Moderate or Strong
Evidence.
Under this priority, a State educational agency (SEA) must ensure
that evidence plays a central role in the SRCL subgrants. Specifically,
in its high-quality plan, an SEA must assure that (1) it will use an
independent peer review process to prioritize awards to eligible
subgrantees that propose high-quality comprehensive literacy
instruction programs that are supported by moderate evidence or strong
evidence, where evidence is applicable and available, and (2) the
comprehensive literacy instruction program proposed by eligible
subgrantees will align with the State's comprehensive literacy plan as
well as local needs.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2017 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional
five points to an application for each competitive preference priority,
depending on how well the application meets one or more of these
priorities.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Serving Disadvantaged Children.
Under this priority, an SEA must describe in its application a
high-quality plan to award subgrants that will serve the greatest
numbers or percentages of disadvantaged children, including children
living in poverty, English learners, and children with disabilities.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Alignment within a Birth through
Fifth Grade Continuum.
Under this priority, an SEA must describe in its application a
high-quality plan to align, through a progression of approaches
appropriate for each age group, early language and literacy projects
supported by this grant that serve children from birth to age five with
programs and systems that serve students in kindergarten through grade
five to improve school readiness and transitions for children across
this continuum.
Requirements: The State Funding Allocations requirement is from
Title III of Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016
(Pub. L. 114-113). The rest of these requirements are from the NFP.
State Funding Allocations.
Grantees must--
(1) Subgrant no less than 95 percent of funds received under this
competition to eligible subgrantees;
(2) Ensure that at least--
(a) 15 percent of the subgranted funds serve children from birth
through age five;
[[Page 22524]]
(b) 40 percent of the subgranted funds serve students in
kindergarten through grade five; and
(c) 40 percent of the subgranted funds serve students in middle and
high school, including an equitable distribution of funds between
middle and high schools.
State Comprehensive Literacy Plan.
To be considered for an award under this program, an SEA must
submit a new or revised State comprehensive literacy plan that is
informed by a recent (conducted in the past five years) and
comprehensive needs assessment developed with the assistance of its
State literacy team. Additionally, the plan must be reviewed by the
State literacy team and updated annually if an SEA receives an award
under this program.
Local Literacy Plan.
Grantees must ensure that they will only fund subgrantees that
submit a local literacy plan that: (1) is informed by a comprehensive
needs assessment and that is aligned with the State comprehensive
literacy plan; (2) provides for professional development; (3) includes
interventions and practices that are supported by moderate evidence or
strong evidence, where evidence is applicable and available; and (4)
includes a plan to track children's outcomes consistent with all
applicable privacy requirements.
Prioritization of Subgrants.
In selecting among eligible subgrantees, an SEA must give priority
to eligible subgrantees serving greater numbers or percentages of
disadvantaged children.
Continuous Program Improvement.
Grantees must use data, including the results of monitoring and
evaluations and other administrative data, to inform the program's
continuous improvement and decisionmaking, to improve program
participant outcomes, and to ensure that disadvantaged children are
served. Additionally, grantees must ensure that subgrantees, educators,
families, and other key stakeholders receive the results of the
evaluations conducted on the effectiveness of the program in a timely
fashion, consistent with all applicable Federal, State, and other
privacy requirements.
Supplement not Supplant.
Grantees must use funds under this program to supplement, and not
supplant, any non-Federal funds that would be used to advance literacy
skills for children from birth through grade 12.
Cooperation with National Evaluation.
Applicants must assure they will only fund subgrantees that provide
a written assurance to cooperate with a national evaluation of the SRCL
program. This may include adhering to the results of a random
assignment process (e.g., lottery) to select schools or early learning
providers that will receive SRCL funds as well as agreeing to implement
the literacy interventions proposed to be funded under SRCL only in
schools or early learning providers that will receive SRCL funds.
Definitions: The definition of ``child with a disability'' is from
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended
by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The rest of these definitions
are from the NFP.
Child with a disability has the same meaning given that term in
section 602 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Child with a disability has the same meaning in the ESEA, as
amended by NCLB, and in the ESEA, as amended by the Every Student
Succeeds Act (ESSA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive literacy instruction means instruction that--
(a) Includes developmentally appropriate, contextually explicit,
and systematic instruction, and frequent practice, in reading and
writing across content areas;
(b) Includes age-appropriate, explicit, systematic, and intentional
instruction in phonological awareness, phonic decoding, vocabulary,
language structure, reading fluency, and reading comprehension;
(c) Includes age-appropriate, explicit instruction in writing,
including opportunities for children to write with clear purposes, with
critical reasoning appropriate to the topic and purpose, and with
specific instruction and feedback from instructional staff;
(d) Makes available and uses diverse, high-quality print materials
that reflect the reading and development levels, and interests, of
children;
(e) Uses differentiated instructional approaches, including
individual and small group instruction and discussion;
(f) Provides opportunities for children to use language with peers
and adults in order to develop language skills, including developing
vocabulary;
(g) Includes frequent practice of reading and writing strategies;
(h) Uses age-appropriate, valid, and reliable screening
assessments, diagnostic assessments, formative assessment processes,
and summative assessments to identify a child's learning needs, to
inform instruction, and to monitor the child's progress and the effects
of instruction;
(i) Uses strategies to enhance children's motivation to read and
write and children's engagement in self-directed learning;
(j) Incorporates the principles of universal design for learning;
(k) Depends on teachers' collaboration in planning, instruction,
and assessing a child's progress and on continuous professional
learning; and
(l) Links literacy instruction to the State's challenging academic
standards, including standards relating to the ability to navigate,
understand, and write about complex subject matters in print and
digital formats.
Disadvantaged child means a child from birth to grade 12 who is at
risk of educational failure or otherwise in need of special assistance
and support, including a child living in poverty, a child with a
disability, or a child who is an English learner. This term also
includes infants and toddlers with developmental delays or a child who
is far below grade level, who has left school before receiving a
regular high school diploma, who is at risk of not graduating with a
diploma on time, who is homeless, who is in foster care, or who has
been incarcerated.
Eligible subgrantee means one or more LEAs or, in the case of early
literacy, one or more LEAs or nonprofit providers of early childhood
education, with a demonstrated record of effectiveness in improving
language and early literacy development of children from birth through
age five and in providing professional development in language and
early literacy development.
English learner means an individual--
(a) Who is aged 3 through 21;
(b) Who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an elementary school
or secondary school;
(c)(i) Who was not born in the United States or whose native
language is a language other than English;
(ii)(I) Who is a Native American or Alaska Native, or a native
resident of the outlying areas; and
(II) Who comes from an environment where a language other than
English has had a significant impact on the individual's level of
English language proficiency; or
(iii) Who is migratory, whose native language is a language other
than English, and who comes from an environment where a language other
than English is dominant; and
(d) Whose difficulties in speaking, reading, writing, or
understanding the English language may be sufficient to deny the
individual--
(i) The ability to meet the challenging State academic standards;
[[Page 22525]]
(ii) The ability to successfully achieve in classrooms where the
language of instruction is English; or
(iii) The opportunity to participate fully in society.
Evidence-based, when used with respect to a State, local
educational agency, or school activity, means an activity, strategy, or
intervention that--
(a) Demonstrates a statistically significant effect on improving
student outcomes or other relevant outcomes based on--
(i) Strong evidence from at least one well-designed and well-
implemented experimental study;
(ii) Moderate evidence from at least one well-designed and well-
implemented quasi-experimental study; or
(iii) Promising evidence from at least one well-designed and well-
implemented correlational study with statistical controls for selection
bias; or
(b)(i) Demonstrates a rationale based on high-quality research
findings or positive evaluation that such activity, strategy, or
intervention is likely to improve student outcomes or other relevant
outcomes; and
(ii) Includes ongoing efforts to examine the effects of such
activity, strategy or intervention.
High-quality plan means any plan developed by the SEA that is
feasible and has a high probability of successful implementation and,
at a minimum, includes--
(a) The key goals of the plan;
(b) The key activities to be undertaken and the rationale for how
the activities support the key goals;
(c) A realistic timeline, including key milestones, for
implementing each key activity;
(d) The party or parties responsible for implementing each activity
and other key personnel assigned to each activity;
(e) A strong theory, including a rationale for the plan and a
corresponding logic model as defined in 34 CFR 77.1;
(f) Performance measures at the State and local levels; and
(g) Appropriate financial resources to support successful
implementation of the plan.
Independent peer review means a high-quality, transparent review
process informed by outside individuals with expertise in literacy
development and education for children from birth through grade 12.
Moderate evidence means a statistically significant effect on
improving student outcomes or other relevant outcomes based on at least
one well-designed and well-implemented quasi-experimental study.
Professional development means activities that--
(a) Are an integral part of school and LEA strategies for providing
educators (including teachers, principals, other school leaders,
specialized instructional support personnel, paraprofessionals, and, as
applicable, early childhood educators) with the knowledge and skills
necessary to enable students to succeed in a well-rounded education and
to meet the State's challenging academic standards;
(b) Are sustained (not stand-alone, one-day, or short term
workshops), intensive, collaborative, job-embedded, data-driven, and
classroom-focused; and
(c) May include activities that--
(1) Improve and increase teachers'--
(i) Knowledge of the academic subjects the teachers teach;
(ii) Understanding of how students learn; or
(iii) Ability to analyze student work and achievement from multiple
sources, including how to adjust instructional strategies, assessments,
and materials based on such analysis;
(2) Are an integral part of broad schoolwide and districtwide
educational improvement plans;
(3) Allow personalized plans for each educator to address the
educator's specific needs identified in observation or other feedback;
(4) Improve classroom management skills;
(5) Support the recruitment, hiring, and training of effective
teachers, including teachers who became certified through State and
local alternative routes to certification;
(6) Advance teacher understanding of--
(i) Effective instructional strategies that are evidence-based; or
(ii) Strategies for improving student academic achievement or
substantially increasing the knowledge and teaching skills of teachers;
(7) Are aligned with, and directly related to, academic goals of
the school or LEA;
(8) Are developed with extensive participation of teachers,
principals, other school leaders, parents, representatives of Indian
Tribes (as applicable), and administrators of schools to be served
under this program;
(9) Are designed to give teachers of English learners, and other
teachers and instructional staff, the knowledge and skills to provide
instruction and appropriate language and academic support services to
those children, including the appropriate use of curricula and
assessments;
(10) To the extent appropriate, provide training for teachers,
principals, and other school and community-based early childhood
program leaders in the use of technology (including education about the
harms of copyright piracy), so that technology and technology
applications are effectively used in the classroom to improve teaching
and learning in the curricula and academic subjects in which the
teachers teach;
(11) As a whole, are regularly evaluated for their impact on
teacher effectiveness and student academic achievement, with the
findings of the evaluations used to improve the quality of professional
development;
(12) Are designed to give teachers of children with disabilities or
children with developmental delays, and other teachers and
instructional staff, the knowledge and skills to provide instruction
and academic support services to those children, including positive
behavioral interventions and supports, multi-tier system of supports,
and use of accommodations;
(13) Provide instruction in the use of data and assessments to
inform classroom practice;
(14) Provide instruction in ways that teachers, principals, other
school leaders, specialized instructional support personnel, and school
administrators may work more effectively with parents and families;
(15) Involve the forming of partnerships with institutions of
higher education, including, as applicable, Tribal Colleges and
Universities as defined in section 316(b) of the Higher Education Act
of 1965, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1059c(b)), to establish school-based
teacher, principal, and other school leader training programs that
provide prospective teachers, novice teachers, principals, and other
school leaders with an opportunity to work under the guidance of
experienced teachers, principals, other school leaders, and faculty of
such institutions;
(16) Create programs to enable paraprofessionals (assisting
teachers employed by an LEA receiving assistance under part A of title
I) to obtain the education necessary for those paraprofessionals to
become certified and licensed teachers;
(17) Provide follow-up training to teachers who have participated
in activities described in this paragraph (c) that are designed to
ensure that the knowledge and skills learned by the teachers are
implemented in the classroom; or
(18) Where practicable, provide for school staff and other early
childhood education program providers to address jointly the transition
to elementary school, including issues related to school readiness.
[[Page 22526]]
State comprehensive literacy plan means a plan that addresses the
pre-literacy and literacy needs of children from birth through grade
12, with special emphasis on disadvantaged children. A State
comprehensive literacy plan is informed by a recent (conducted in the
past five years) comprehensive needs assessment; aligns policies,
resources, and practices; contains clear instructional goals; sets high
expectations for all children and subgroups of children; and provides
for professional development for all teachers in effective literacy
instruction.
State literacy team means a team comprised of individuals with
expertise in literacy development and education for children from birth
through grade 12. The State literacy team must include individuals with
expertise in the following areas:
(a) Implementing literacy development practices and instruction for
children in the following age/grade levels: Birth through age five,
kindergarten through grade 5, grades 6 through 8, and grades 9 through
12;
(b) Managing and implementing literacy programs that are supported
by strong evidence or moderate evidence;
(c) Evaluating comprehensive literacy instruction programs;
(d) Planning for and implementing effective literacy interventions
and practices, particularly for disadvantaged children, children living
in poverty, struggling readers, English learners, and children with
disabilities;
(e) Implementing assessments in the areas of phonological
awareness, word recognition, phonics, vocabulary, comprehension,
fluency, and writing; and
(f) Implementing professional development on literacy development
and instruction.
A literacy team member may have expertise in more than one area.
Team members may also include, but are not limited to: Library/media
specialists; parents; literacy coaches; instructors of adult education;
representatives of community-based organizations providing educational
services to disadvantaged children and families; family literacy
service providers; representatives from local or State school boards;
and representatives from related child services agencies.
Strong evidence means a statistically significant effect on
improving student outcomes or other relevant outcomes based on at least
one well-designed and well-implemented experimental study.
Universal design for learning, as defined under section 103 of the
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, means a scientifically valid
framework for guiding educational practice that--
(a) Provides flexibility in the ways information is presented, in
the ways students respond or demonstrate knowledge and skills, and in
the ways students are engaged; and
(b) Reduces barriers in instruction, provides appropriate
accommodations, supports, and challenges, and maintains high
achievement expectations for all students, including students with
disabilities and students who are limited English proficient.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ English learner and limited English proficient have the same
meaning.
Program Authority: Section 1502 of the ESEA, as amended by the
NCLB, and Title III of Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2016 (Pub. L. 114-113).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Title III of Division H of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2016 (Pub L. 114-113) appropriated funds for the SRCL program
under section 1502 of the ESEA, as amended by the NCLB. As such, the
upcoming SRCL competition will be conducted under that authority.
The Department notes that the ESEA, as amended in December 2015 by
the ESSA, authorizes the Comprehensive Literacy State Development
(CLSD) program, a program that is substantively similar to SRCL. See
sections 2221-2224 of the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA. To provide
for the orderly transition to future programs under the ESSA, the
priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria that
apply to the SRCL program through this notice align, to the extent
possible, with certain new statutory requirements that will apply to
the CLSD program.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted
and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
NFP.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $190,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $3,000,000--$80,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $18,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5--10. The Department may make awards
under this competition for the complete three-year (36-month) project
period using FY 2016 and FY 2017 funds.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs of the 50 States, the District of
Columbia, and Puerto Rico (referred to in this notice as State).
2. a. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or
matching.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: As specified under Requirements, this
program involves supplement-not-supplant funding requirements.
3. Eligible Subgrantees: (a) Under 34 CFR 75.708(b) and (c) a
grantee may award subgrants--to directly carry out project activities
described in its application--to the following types of entities: One
or more LEAs or, in the case of early literacy, one or more LEAs or
nonprofit providers of early childhood education, with a demonstrated
record of effectiveness in improving language and early literacy
development of children from birth through age five and in providing
professional development in language and early literacy development.
(b) The grantee may award subgrants to entities it selects through
a competition under procedures established by the grantee.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: You can obtain an
application package via the internet, from the Education Publications
Center (ED Pubs), or from the program office.
To obtain a copy via the internet, use the following address:
ww.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/grantapps/.
To obtain a copy from ED Pubs, write, fax, or call: ED Pubs, U.S.
Department of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304.
Telephone, toll free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY),
call, toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program as follows: CFDA number 84.371C.
To obtain a copy from the program office, contact: Cindy Savage,
U.S.
[[Page 22527]]
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., room 3E237,
Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 453-5998 or by email:
OESE.SRCL@ed.gov. If you use a TDD or TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at
1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission:
Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you: (1) Limit the application narrative
to no more than 50 pages, and (2) use the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes,
the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the recommended
page limit does apply to all of the application narrative, which
includes responses to the priorities and selection criteria.
Requirements concerning the content and form of an application,
together with the forms you must submit, are in the application package
for this competition.
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: May 16, 2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 17, 2017.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to Other Submission Requirements in section
IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
either person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. If the
Department provides an accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual
with a disability in connection with the application process, the
individual's application remains subject to all other requirements and
limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: September 13, 2017.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this competition.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the
Department of Education (Department), you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM), the Government's primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet at the
following Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the
completeness and accuracy of the data you enter into the SAM database.
Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal financial
assistance under a program administered by the Department, please allow
sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN. We
strongly recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active, it may be 24 to 48
hours before you can access the information in, and submit an
application through, Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements.
Applications for grants under this competition must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement
in accordance with the instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under the SRCL program, CFDA 84.371C, must
be submitted electronically using the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply
site at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download
a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload
and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
[[Page 22528]]
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the SRCL
program at www.Grants.gov. You must search for the downloadable
application package for this competition by the CFDA number. Do not
include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for
84.371, not 84.371C).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this competition to ensure that
you submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education Submission Procedures
pertaining to Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5
system home page at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific guidance and
procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov, please
refer to the Grants.gov Web site at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a read-only, flattened
Portable Document Format (PDF), meaning any fillable PDF documents must
be saved as flattened non-fillable files. Therefore, do not upload an
interactive or fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than
a read-only, flattened PDF (e.g., Word, Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or
submit a password-protected file, we will not review that material.
Please note that this could result in your application not being
considered for funding because the material in question--for example,
the application narrative--is critical to a meaningful review of your
proposal. For that reason, it is important to allow yourself adequate
time to upload all material as PDF files. The Department will not
convert material from other formats to PDF. There is no need to
password protect a file in order to meet the requirement to submit a
read-only flattened PDF. And, as noted above, the Department will not
review password-protected files. Additional, detailed information on
how to attach files is in the application instructions.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by email if your application met all
the Grants.gov validation requirements or if there were any errors
(such as submission of your application by someone other than a
registered Authorized Organization Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that contains special characters). You will
be given an opportunity to correct any errors and resubmit, but you
must still meet the deadline for submission of applications.
Once your application is successfully validated by Grants.gov, the
Department will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send you
an email with a unique PR/Award number for your application.
These emails do not mean that your application is without any
disqualifying errors. While your application may have been successfully
validated by Grants.gov, it must also meet the Department's application
requirements as specified in this notice and in the application
instructions. Disqualifying errors could include, for instance, failure
to upload attachments in a read-only, flattened PDF; failure to submit
a required part of the application; or failure to meet applicant
eligibility requirements. It is your responsibility to ensure that your
submitted application has met all of the Department's requirements.
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT and provide an explanation
of the technical problem you experienced with Grants.gov, along with
the Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a technical problem occurred with
the Grants.gov system and that the problem affected your ability to
submit your application by 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. We will contact you after we determine
whether your application will be accepted.
[[Page 22529]]
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system;
and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Cindy Savage, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3E237,
Washington, DC 20202. FAX: (202) 260-8969.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand-delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.371C, LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
We will not consider applications postmarked after the application
deadline date.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
CFDA Number 84.371C, 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from the NFP and 34 CFR 75.210, and are as follows:
(a) State-level activities (30 points).
To determine the quality of the applicant's State-level activities,
the Secretary considers--
(1) The extent to which the SEA will support and provide technical
assistance to its SRCL program subgrantees to ensure they implement a
high-quality comprehensive literacy instruction program that will
improve student achievement, including technical assistance on
identifying and implementing with fidelity interventions and practices
that are supported by moderate evidence or strong evidence and align
with local needs; and
(2) The extent to which the SEA will collect data and other
information to inform the continuous improvement, and evaluate the
effectiveness and impact, of local projects.
(b) SEA plan for subgrants (20 points).
To determine the quality of the applicant's SEA plan for subgrants,
the Secretary considers the extent to which the SEA has a high-quality
plan to use an independent peer review process to award subgrants that
propose a high-quality comprehensive literacy instruction program,
including--
(1) A plan to prioritize projects that will use interventions and
practices that are supported by moderate evidence or strong evidence;
and
(2) A process to determine--
(i) The extent to which the intervention or practice is supported
by moderate evidence or strong evidence;
(ii) The alignment of the local project to the State's
comprehensive literacy plan and the local literacy plan;
(iii) The extent to which the interventions and practices are
differentiated and are appropriate for children from birth through age
five and children in kindergarten through grade 5; and
(iv) The relevance of cited studies to the project proposed and
identified needs.
(c) SEA monitoring plan (30 points).
To determine the quality of the applicant's SEA monitoring plan,
the Secretary considers the extent to which the SEA describes a high-
quality plan for monitoring local projects, including how it will
ensure that--
(1) The interventions and practices that are part of the
comprehensive literacy instruction program are aligned with the SEA's
State comprehensive literacy plan;
(2) The interventions and practices that subgrantees implement are
supported by moderate evidence or strong evidence, to the extent
appropriate and available;
(3) The interventions and practices are differentiated and are
appropriate for children from birth through age five and children in
kindergarten through grade 5; and
[[Page 22530]]
(4) The interventions and practices are implemented with fidelity
and aligned with the SEA's State comprehensive literacy plan and local
literacy plan.
(d) Alignment of resources (10 points).
To determine the quality of the applicant's alignment of resources,
the Secretary considers the extent to which the SEA will:
(1) Target subgrants supporting projects that will improve
instruction for the greatest numbers or percentages of disadvantaged
children; and
(2) Award subgrants of sufficient size to fully and effectively
implement the local plan while also ensuring that at least--
(a) 15 percent of the subgranted funds serve children from birth
through age five;
(b) 40 percent of the subgranted funds serve students in
kindergarten through grade five; and
(c) 40 percent of the subgranted funds serve students in middle and
high school, through grade 12, including an equitable distribution of
funds between middle and high schools.
(e) Adequacy of resources (25 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project. In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project;
and
(2) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
number of persons to be served and to the anticipated results and
benefits.
(f) Quality of the project design (5 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the project design. In
determining the quality of the design of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the extent to which the proposed project is
designed to build capacity and yield results that will extend beyond
the period of Federal financial assistance.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Special Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this program the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose special conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$150,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through SAM. You may review and comment on any
information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
4. Performance Measures: The Department has established the
following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 performance
measures for the SRCL program:
(1) The percentage of participating four-year-old children who
achieve significant gains in oral language skills.
(2) The percentage of participating fifth-grade students who meet
or exceed proficiency on State reading/language arts assessments under
section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.
(3) The percentage of participating eighth-grade students who meet
or exceed proficiency on State reading/language arts assessments under
section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.
[[Page 22531]]
(4) The percentage of participating high school students who meet
or exceed proficiency on State reading/language arts assessments under
section 1111(b)(2)(B)(v)(I) of the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA.
These measures constitute the Department's indicator of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant under
this program to give careful consideration to these measures in
conceptualizing the approach and evaluation for its proposed project.
Each grantee will be required to provide, in its annual performance and
final reports, data about its progress in meeting these measures.
5. Continuation Awards: Grants awarded under this competition may
be for a project period of up to three years. The Department will
either award grantees their entire three-year award at the time of the
initial award, or will award grantees only the first-year portion of
their award. If the Department awards grantees only the first-year
portion of their award, depending on the availability of funds, the
Department will make continuation awards for years two and three in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.253. In making a continuation award under 34
CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a
grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and
objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a
manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget;
and, if the Secretary has established performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in the grantee's approved
application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
either program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: May 11, 2017.
Jason Botel,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2017-09896 Filed 5-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P