Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan; Determinations, 22560-22561 [2017-09881]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22560
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
Respondent
Occupation
SOC Code
Grantee Contact Person .................................
ROSS Service Coordinator & Partners ..........
Chief Executive ..............................................
Social and Community Services Manager .....
Community and Social Service Specialist, All
Other.
Median hourly
wage rate
11–1011
11–9151
21–1099
Average
(median)
hourly wage
rate
$84.19
30.54
20.14
$84.19
25.34
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics (May 2015), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm.
Hourly costs for public housing
resident focus group participants were
estimated using FY 2016 HUD 30%
Income Limit for All Areas calculations
from the Office of Policy Development
and Research through HUD’s Web site
located at https://www.huduser.gov/
portal/datasets/il/il16/. This
identifies income limits by county for
extremely low income households
earning at or below 30% of their county
median income. These limits are
adjusted by household sizes of up to
eight household members. We averaged
the county median values to produce a
national average median income by
household size for extremely low
income households. Based on the
ROSS–SC program emphasis on
increasing family self-sufficiency, and
independent living and aging in place
for the elderly and disabled, we estimate
that:
• 20% of potential respondents will
live alone (21 respondents) with an
average median income of $13,537.
• 10% will reside in a 2-person
household (11 respondents) with an
average median income of $15,464.
• 30% will reside in a 3-person
household (32 respondents) with an
average median income of $17,396.
Number of
respondents
Information collection
ROSS Grantee Contact Person Survey ..
ROSS Service Coordinators Survey ........
ROSS Site Visit—Staff and Partners .......
HUD Residents living alone .....................
HUD Residents in 2-person household ...
HUD Residents in 3-person household ...
HUD Residents in 4-person household ...
HUD Residents in 5-person household ...
330
Hourly cost
per response
($)
Annual burden
hours
Total cost
($)
56
21
11
32
32
11
0.25
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
82.5
840
112
42
22
64
64
22
84.19
25.34
25.34
6.94
7.93
8.92
9.90
10.70
6,945.68
21,285.60
2,838.08
291.48
174.46
570.88
633.60
235.40
1,333
........................
........................
1,248.5
........................
32,975.18
full population is estimated at 1,200 service coordinators. The number of respondents is based on anticipated response rate of 70%.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Burden hour
per response
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 840
Total ..................................................
1 The
Frequency of
response
• 30% will reside in a 4-person
household (32 respondents) with an
average median income of $19,305.
• 10% will reside in a 5-person
household (11 respondents) with an
average median income of $20,872.
To produce a basic hourly rate, we
divide the average median annual
income amount by 1,950 work hours per
year, equaling 5 days at 37.5 hours per
week for each of the 52 weeks out of the
year.
All assumptions are reflected in the
table below.
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
Dated: May 9, 2017.
Matthew E. Ammon,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Development and Research.
[FR Doc. 2017–09866 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on helical
spring lock washers from China and
Taiwan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.
Background
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–624–625 (Fourth
Review)]
Helical Spring Lock Washers From
China and Taiwan; Determinations
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted these reviews on November 1,
2016 (81 FR 75851) and determined on
February 6, 2017 that it would conduct
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices
expedited reviews (82 FR 12241, March
1, 2017).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on May 16, 2017. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4689 (May 2017),
entitled Helical Spring Lock Washers
from China and Taiwan: Investigation
Nos. 731–TA–624–625 (Fourth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 11, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–09881 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–0009]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Law
Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted Program, Analysis of
Officers Feloniously Killed and
Assaulted; and Law Enforcement
Officers Killed and Assaulted Program,
Analysis of Officers Accidentally Killed
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Criminal Justice Information
Services Division (CJIS), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until July
17, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All
comments, suggestions, or questions
regarding additional information, to
include obtaining a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Mrs. Amy C. Blasher, Unit
Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Information Services Division,
Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–3566.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 May 15, 2017
Jkt 241001
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted Program, Analysis of Officers
Feloniously Killed and Assaulted
Program; and Law Enforcement Officers
Killed and Assaulted, Analysis of
Officers Accidentally Killed.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is 1–701 and 1–701a.
The applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Criminal
Justice Information Services Division, in
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: City, county, state, tribal and
federal law enforcement agencies.
Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S. Code,
Section 534, Acquisition, Preservation,
and Exchange of Identification Records;
Appointment of Officials this collection
requests the number of officers killed or
assaulted from law enforcement
agencies in order for the FBI Uniform
Crime Reporting Program to serve as the
national clearinghouse for the collection
and dissemination of law enforcement
officer death/assault data and to publish
these statistics in Law Enforcement
Officers Killed and Assaulted.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22561
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: UCR Participation Burden
Estimation: There are approximately
188 law enforcement agency
respondents with an estimated response
time of 1 hour per report.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are approximately 188
hours, annual burden, associated with
this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 10, 2017.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2017–09788 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–0002]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested;
Supplementary Homicide Report
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Criminal Justice Information
Services Division (CJIS), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until July
17, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All
comments, suggestions, or questions
regarding additional information, to
include obtaining a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Mrs. Amy C. Blasher, Unit
Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Information Services Division,
Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–3566.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22560-22561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09881]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-624-625 (Fourth Review)]
Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan; Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on helical
spring lock washers from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), instituted these reviews on November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75851)
and determined on February 6, 2017 that it would conduct
[[Page 22561]]
expedited reviews (82 FR 12241, March 1, 2017).
The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its
determinations in these reviews on May 16, 2017. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4689 (May 2017), entitled
Helical Spring Lock Washers from China and Taiwan: Investigation Nos.
731-TA-624-625 (Fourth Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 11, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-09881 Filed 5-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
