Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan; Determinations, 22560-22561 [2017-09881]

Download as PDF 22560 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices Respondent Occupation SOC Code Grantee Contact Person ................................. ROSS Service Coordinator & Partners .......... Chief Executive .............................................. Social and Community Services Manager ..... Community and Social Service Specialist, All Other. Median hourly wage rate 11–1011 11–9151 21–1099 Average (median) hourly wage rate $84.19 30.54 20.14 $84.19 25.34 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment Statistics (May 2015), https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm. Hourly costs for public housing resident focus group participants were estimated using FY 2016 HUD 30% Income Limit for All Areas calculations from the Office of Policy Development and Research through HUD’s Web site located at https://www.huduser.gov/ portal/datasets/il/il16/. This identifies income limits by county for extremely low income households earning at or below 30% of their county median income. These limits are adjusted by household sizes of up to eight household members. We averaged the county median values to produce a national average median income by household size for extremely low income households. Based on the ROSS–SC program emphasis on increasing family self-sufficiency, and independent living and aging in place for the elderly and disabled, we estimate that: • 20% of potential respondents will live alone (21 respondents) with an average median income of $13,537. • 10% will reside in a 2-person household (11 respondents) with an average median income of $15,464. • 30% will reside in a 3-person household (32 respondents) with an average median income of $17,396. Number of respondents Information collection ROSS Grantee Contact Person Survey .. ROSS Service Coordinators Survey ........ ROSS Site Visit—Staff and Partners ....... HUD Residents living alone ..................... HUD Residents in 2-person household ... HUD Residents in 3-person household ... HUD Residents in 4-person household ... HUD Residents in 5-person household ... 330 Hourly cost per response ($) Annual burden hours Total cost ($) 56 21 11 32 32 11 0.25 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 82.5 840 112 42 22 64 64 22 84.19 25.34 25.34 6.94 7.93 8.92 9.90 10.70 6,945.68 21,285.60 2,838.08 291.48 174.46 570.88 633.60 235.40 1,333 ........................ ........................ 1,248.5 ........................ 32,975.18 full population is estimated at 1,200 service coordinators. The number of respondents is based on anticipated response rate of 70%. B. Solicitation of Public Comment sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Burden hour per response 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 840 Total .................................................. 1 The Frequency of response • 30% will reside in a 4-person household (32 respondents) with an average median income of $19,305. • 10% will reside in a 5-person household (11 respondents) with an average median income of $20,872. To produce a basic hourly rate, we divide the average median annual income amount by 1,950 work hours per year, equaling 5 days at 37.5 hours per week for each of the 52 weeks out of the year. All assumptions are reflected in the table below. This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 May 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35. Dated: May 9, 2017. Matthew E. Ammon, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Development and Research. [FR Doc. 2017–09866 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on helical spring lock washers from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–624–625 (Fourth Review)] Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan; Determinations PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), instituted these reviews on November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75851) and determined on February 6, 2017 that it would conduct 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 16, 2017 / Notices expedited reviews (82 FR 12241, March 1, 2017). The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on May 16, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4689 (May 2017), entitled Helical Spring Lock Washers from China and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–624–625 (Fourth Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 11, 2017. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017–09881 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–0009] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Program, Analysis of Officers Feloniously Killed and Assaulted; and Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Program, Analysis of Officers Accidentally Killed Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until July 17, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All comments, suggestions, or questions regarding additional information, to include obtaining a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, should be directed to Mrs. Amy C. Blasher, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Information Services Division, Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625–3566. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 May 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection: 1. Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently approved collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Program, Analysis of Officers Feloniously Killed and Assaulted Program; and Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, Analysis of Officers Accidentally Killed. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: The form number is 1–701 and 1–701a. The applicable component within the Department of Justice is the Criminal Justice Information Services Division, in the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: City, county, state, tribal and federal law enforcement agencies. Abstract: Under Title 28, U.S. Code, Section 534, Acquisition, Preservation, and Exchange of Identification Records; Appointment of Officials this collection requests the number of officers killed or assaulted from law enforcement agencies in order for the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program to serve as the national clearinghouse for the collection and dissemination of law enforcement officer death/assault data and to publish these statistics in Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22561 estimated for an average respondent to respond: UCR Participation Burden Estimation: There are approximately 188 law enforcement agency respondents with an estimated response time of 1 hour per report. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are approximately 188 hours, annual burden, associated with this information collection. If additional information is required contact: Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: May 10, 2017. Melody Braswell, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2017–09788 Filed 5–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Federal Bureau of Investigation [OMB Number 1110–0002] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Supplementary Homicide Report Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS), will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until July 17, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All comments, suggestions, or questions regarding additional information, to include obtaining a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions, should be directed to Mrs. Amy C. Blasher, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Information Services Division, Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; facsimile (304) 625–3566. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22560-22561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09881]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 731-TA-624-625 (Fourth Review)]


Helical Spring Lock Washers From China and Taiwan; Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on helical 
spring lock washers from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 
1675(c)), instituted these reviews on November 1, 2016 (81 FR 75851) 
and determined on February 6, 2017 that it would conduct

[[Page 22561]]

expedited reviews (82 FR 12241, March 1, 2017).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on May 16, 2017. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4689 (May 2017), entitled 
Helical Spring Lock Washers from China and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 
731-TA-624-625 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 11, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-09881 Filed 5-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.