Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 22362-22363 [2017-09729]
Download as PDF
22362
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 92 / Monday, May 15, 2017 / Notices
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,8 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is intended to
adopt the Quoting and Depth Standard
in June 2017 rather than in May 2017,
as was originally proposed in the ELP
Program Filing, while extending the
current Quoting Standard through May
2017.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 9 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 10
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2017–50 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
13:51 May 12, 2017
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09715 Filed 5–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–520, OMB Control No.
3235–0577]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–2736
Extension:
Rule 30b1–5
8 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2017–50. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2017–50 and should be
submitted on or before June 5, 2017.
11 17
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Rule 30b1–5 (17 CFR 270.30b1–5)
under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) (the
‘‘Investment Company Act’’) requires
registered management investment
companies, other than small business
investment companies registered on
Form N–5 (17 CFR 239.24 and 274.5)
(‘‘funds’’), to file a quarterly report via
the Commission’s EDGAR system on
Form N–Q (17 CFR 249.332 and
274.130), not more than sixty calendar
days after the close of each first and
third fiscal quarter, containing their
complete portfolio holdings. The
purpose of the collection of information
required by rule 30b1–5 is to meet the
disclosure requirements of the
Investment Company Act and to provide
investors with information necessary to
evaluate an interest in the fund by
improving the transparency of
information about the fund’s portfolio
holdings.
The Commission estimates that there
are 2,380 management investment
companies, with a total of
approximately 11,757 portfolios, that
are governed by the rule. For purposes
of this analysis, the burden associated
with the requirements of rule 30b1–5
has been included in the collection of
information requirements of Form N–Q,
rather than the rule.
The collection of information under
rule 30b1–5 is mandatory. The
information provided under rule 30b1–
5 is not kept confidential. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 92 / Monday, May 15, 2017 / Notices
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Pamela Dyson, Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549; or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 9, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09729 Filed 5–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80634; File No. SR–FINRA–
2017–009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Expediting List Selection in Arbitration
May 9, 2017.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 26,
2017, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rules 12402 and 12403 of the Code of
Arbitration Procedure for Customer
Disputes (‘‘Customer Code’’) and FINRA
Rule 13403 of the Code of Arbitration
Procedure for Industry Disputes
(‘‘Industry Code,’’ and together with the
Customer Code, the ‘‘Codes’’), to
provide that the Director of FINRA’s
Office of Dispute Resolution (‘‘ODR
Director’’) will send the list or lists
generated by the Neutral List Selection
System (‘‘NLSS’’) 3 to all parties at the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 NLSS is a computer system that generates, on a
random basis, a list or lists of arbitrators from
FINRA’s rosters of arbitrators for the selected
hearing location for each arbitration proceeding.
The parties will select their panel through a process
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
same time, within approximately 30
days after the last answer is due,
regardless of the parties’ agreement to
extend any answer due date.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
13:51 May 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Background
Under the Codes, a party must serve
an answer on each other party to an
arbitration within the timeframes
specified under the applicable
provisions of the Codes. For example,
FINRA Rule 12303 requires a
respondent to serve an answer
specifying the relevant facts and
available defenses to the statement of
claim on each other party to the
arbitration within 45 days of receipt of
the statement of claim (the ‘‘answer due
date’’).4 If there are multiple
respondents to an arbitration, and the
respondents are added at different
times, each respondent would have a
different answer due date.5 The Codes
require the ODR Director 6 to wait until
after the last answer is due 7 to send the
list or lists of arbitrators generated by
NLSS to the parties. Specifically, the
Codes provide that the ODR Director
of striking and ranking the arbitrators on a list or
lists generated by NLSS.
4 See also FINRA Rule 13303.
5 If an amended claim adds a new party to the
arbitration, the new party would be required to
serve an answer on all other parties within 45 days
of receipt of the claim. See FINRA Rules 12306,
12310, 13306, and 13310.
6 Unless the Codes provide that the ODR Director
may not delegate a specific function, the term
includes FINRA staff to whom the ODR Director has
delegated authority. See FINRA Rules 12100(k) and
13100(k). See also FINRA Rules 12103 and 13103.
7 The answer due date for the last respondent
added to the arbitration would be when the last
answer is due for purposes of the Codes.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22363
must send the list or lists of arbitrators
to all parties at the same time within
approximately 30 days after the last
answer is due.8
Currently, when parties to an
arbitration agree to extend the deadline
for when an answer is due, the ODR
Director uses that new, agreed-upon
extended answer due date as the last
answer due date for sending the
arbitrator list or lists to the parties.9
FINRA believes that by sending the
arbitrator list or lists after the original
due date for the last answer, regardless
of any extension, it can shorten the time
it takes for an arbitration to conclude in
those instances. Party agreements to
extend answer due dates would no
longer affect the timing of providing the
arbitrator list or lists to the parties.
Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rules 12402(c)(1), 12403(b)(1), and
13403(c)(1) to provide that the ODR
Director will send the list or lists
generated by NLSS to all parties at the
same time, within approximately 30
days after the last answer is due,
regardless of the parties’ agreement to
extend any answer due date.
As parties must return the ranked
arbitrator list or lists to the ODR
Director no more than 20 days after the
date upon which the ODR Director sent
the list or lists to the parties,10 sending
the list or lists after the original due date
for the last answer would give all parties
the same amount of time to create their
ranked arbitrator list or lists. Further,
FINRA believes that sending the list or
lists at this time would result in earlier
arbitrator appointment and, therefore,
an earlier initial prehearing conference
at which the hearings are scheduled.11
In the many instances in which the
parties agree to extend an answer due
date, FINRA believes the proposed rule
change would help arbitrations
conclude in less time than they do
under current rules.
As noted in Item 2 of this filing, if the
Commission approves the proposed rule
change, FINRA will announce the
effective date of the proposed rule
change in a Regulatory Notice to be
published no later than 60 days
following Commission approval. The
effective date will be no later than 30
8 The Codes also state that the parties will receive
employment history for the past 10 years and other
background information for each arbitrator listed.
See FINRA Rules 12402, 12403, and 13403.
9 In 2015, parties requested an extension to
answer in approximately 65 percent of arbitration
cases served; in 2016, the figure was approximately
62 percent.
10 See FINRA Rules 12402(d)(3), 12403(c)(3), and
13404(d).
11 See FINRA Rules 12500(c) and 13500(c).
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 92 (Monday, May 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22362-22363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09729]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270-520, OMB Control No. 3235-0577]
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736
Extension:
Rule 30b1-5
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
Rule 30b1-5 (17 CFR 270.30b1-5) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (the ``Investment Company Act'')
requires registered management investment companies, other than small
business investment companies registered on Form N-5 (17 CFR 239.24 and
274.5) (``funds''), to file a quarterly report via the Commission's
EDGAR system on Form N-Q (17 CFR 249.332 and 274.130), not more than
sixty calendar days after the close of each first and third fiscal
quarter, containing their complete portfolio holdings. The purpose of
the collection of information required by rule 30b1-5 is to meet the
disclosure requirements of the Investment Company Act and to provide
investors with information necessary to evaluate an interest in the
fund by improving the transparency of information about the fund's
portfolio holdings.
The Commission estimates that there are 2,380 management investment
companies, with a total of approximately 11,757 portfolios, that are
governed by the rule. For purposes of this analysis, the burden
associated with the requirements of rule 30b1-5 has been included in
the collection of information requirements of Form N-Q, rather than the
rule.
The collection of information under rule 30b1-5 is mandatory. The
information provided under rule 30b1-5 is not kept confidential. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
[[Page 22363]]
technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 9, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09729 Filed 5-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P