Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Expediting List Selection in Arbitration, 22363-22364 [2017-09716]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 92 / Monday, May 15, 2017 / Notices
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Pamela Dyson, Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549; or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: May 9, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09729 Filed 5–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80634; File No. SR–FINRA–
2017–009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Expediting List Selection in Arbitration
May 9, 2017.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 26,
2017, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rules 12402 and 12403 of the Code of
Arbitration Procedure for Customer
Disputes (‘‘Customer Code’’) and FINRA
Rule 13403 of the Code of Arbitration
Procedure for Industry Disputes
(‘‘Industry Code,’’ and together with the
Customer Code, the ‘‘Codes’’), to
provide that the Director of FINRA’s
Office of Dispute Resolution (‘‘ODR
Director’’) will send the list or lists
generated by the Neutral List Selection
System (‘‘NLSS’’) 3 to all parties at the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 NLSS is a computer system that generates, on a
random basis, a list or lists of arbitrators from
FINRA’s rosters of arbitrators for the selected
hearing location for each arbitration proceeding.
The parties will select their panel through a process
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
same time, within approximately 30
days after the last answer is due,
regardless of the parties’ agreement to
extend any answer due date.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s Web site at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
13:51 May 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Background
Under the Codes, a party must serve
an answer on each other party to an
arbitration within the timeframes
specified under the applicable
provisions of the Codes. For example,
FINRA Rule 12303 requires a
respondent to serve an answer
specifying the relevant facts and
available defenses to the statement of
claim on each other party to the
arbitration within 45 days of receipt of
the statement of claim (the ‘‘answer due
date’’).4 If there are multiple
respondents to an arbitration, and the
respondents are added at different
times, each respondent would have a
different answer due date.5 The Codes
require the ODR Director 6 to wait until
after the last answer is due 7 to send the
list or lists of arbitrators generated by
NLSS to the parties. Specifically, the
Codes provide that the ODR Director
of striking and ranking the arbitrators on a list or
lists generated by NLSS.
4 See also FINRA Rule 13303.
5 If an amended claim adds a new party to the
arbitration, the new party would be required to
serve an answer on all other parties within 45 days
of receipt of the claim. See FINRA Rules 12306,
12310, 13306, and 13310.
6 Unless the Codes provide that the ODR Director
may not delegate a specific function, the term
includes FINRA staff to whom the ODR Director has
delegated authority. See FINRA Rules 12100(k) and
13100(k). See also FINRA Rules 12103 and 13103.
7 The answer due date for the last respondent
added to the arbitration would be when the last
answer is due for purposes of the Codes.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22363
must send the list or lists of arbitrators
to all parties at the same time within
approximately 30 days after the last
answer is due.8
Currently, when parties to an
arbitration agree to extend the deadline
for when an answer is due, the ODR
Director uses that new, agreed-upon
extended answer due date as the last
answer due date for sending the
arbitrator list or lists to the parties.9
FINRA believes that by sending the
arbitrator list or lists after the original
due date for the last answer, regardless
of any extension, it can shorten the time
it takes for an arbitration to conclude in
those instances. Party agreements to
extend answer due dates would no
longer affect the timing of providing the
arbitrator list or lists to the parties.
Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA
Rules 12402(c)(1), 12403(b)(1), and
13403(c)(1) to provide that the ODR
Director will send the list or lists
generated by NLSS to all parties at the
same time, within approximately 30
days after the last answer is due,
regardless of the parties’ agreement to
extend any answer due date.
As parties must return the ranked
arbitrator list or lists to the ODR
Director no more than 20 days after the
date upon which the ODR Director sent
the list or lists to the parties,10 sending
the list or lists after the original due date
for the last answer would give all parties
the same amount of time to create their
ranked arbitrator list or lists. Further,
FINRA believes that sending the list or
lists at this time would result in earlier
arbitrator appointment and, therefore,
an earlier initial prehearing conference
at which the hearings are scheduled.11
In the many instances in which the
parties agree to extend an answer due
date, FINRA believes the proposed rule
change would help arbitrations
conclude in less time than they do
under current rules.
As noted in Item 2 of this filing, if the
Commission approves the proposed rule
change, FINRA will announce the
effective date of the proposed rule
change in a Regulatory Notice to be
published no later than 60 days
following Commission approval. The
effective date will be no later than 30
8 The Codes also state that the parties will receive
employment history for the past 10 years and other
background information for each arbitrator listed.
See FINRA Rules 12402, 12403, and 13403.
9 In 2015, parties requested an extension to
answer in approximately 65 percent of arbitration
cases served; in 2016, the figure was approximately
62 percent.
10 See FINRA Rules 12402(d)(3), 12403(c)(3), and
13404(d).
11 See FINRA Rules 12500(c) and 13500(c).
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
22364
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 92 / Monday, May 15, 2017 / Notices
days following publication of the
Regulatory Notice announcing
Commission approval.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
2. Statutory Basis
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,12 which
requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule
change is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act. The proposal
would enable the parties, or their
counsel, to evaluate and rank the
arbitrator list or lists at the same time
that they prepare their responses in
those circumstances where the parties
request an extension to answer. Thus,
the proposal would shorten the time it
takes for such arbitrations to conclude
and, thereby, make the forum more
efficient and the case administration
process more expeditious for investors.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Where
parties agree to an extension or
modification of any deadline for serving
answers, the proposal would likely
result in parties, or their counsels,
evaluating the arbitrator list or lists and
ranking their selections, while
simultaneously preparing their
responses. Currently, these activities
occur serially. However, FINRA notes
that parties often jointly request that the
ODR Director send the list or lists before
the last answer due date deadline.
Therefore, FINRA believes that the
proposed rule change would not be
burdensome. As noted, the benefit to
parties arises from concluding arbitrator
selection earlier, thereby expediting the
arbitration process. FINRA anticipates
that this proposal would impose no
significant costs to forum users.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
12 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 May 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2017–009 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2017–009. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–09716 Filed 5–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
PO 00000
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of
FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2017–009 and
should be submitted on or before June
5, 2017.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–80630; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2017–043]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule
4702 (Order Types)
May 9, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 26,
2017, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 4702 (Order Types) to modify the
behavior of Post-Only Orders in certain
situations.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 92 (Monday, May 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22363-22364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09716]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-80634; File No. SR-FINRA-2017-009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Expediting List Selection in Arbitration
May 9, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 26, 2017, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rules 12402 and 12403 of the Code
of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (``Customer Code'') and
FINRA Rule 13403 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry
Disputes (``Industry Code,'' and together with the Customer Code, the
``Codes''), to provide that the Director of FINRA's Office of Dispute
Resolution (``ODR Director'') will send the list or lists generated by
the Neutral List Selection System (``NLSS'') \3\ to all parties at the
same time, within approximately 30 days after the last answer is due,
regardless of the parties' agreement to extend any answer due date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NLSS is a computer system that generates, on a random basis,
a list or lists of arbitrators from FINRA's rosters of arbitrators
for the selected hearing location for each arbitration proceeding.
The parties will select their panel through a process of striking
and ranking the arbitrators on a list or lists generated by NLSS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at https://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Background
Under the Codes, a party must serve an answer on each other party
to an arbitration within the timeframes specified under the applicable
provisions of the Codes. For example, FINRA Rule 12303 requires a
respondent to serve an answer specifying the relevant facts and
available defenses to the statement of claim on each other party to the
arbitration within 45 days of receipt of the statement of claim (the
``answer due date'').\4\ If there are multiple respondents to an
arbitration, and the respondents are added at different times, each
respondent would have a different answer due date.\5\ The Codes require
the ODR Director \6\ to wait until after the last answer is due \7\ to
send the list or lists of arbitrators generated by NLSS to the parties.
Specifically, the Codes provide that the ODR Director must send the
list or lists of arbitrators to all parties at the same time within
approximately 30 days after the last answer is due.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See also FINRA Rule 13303.
\5\ If an amended claim adds a new party to the arbitration, the
new party would be required to serve an answer on all other parties
within 45 days of receipt of the claim. See FINRA Rules 12306,
12310, 13306, and 13310.
\6\ Unless the Codes provide that the ODR Director may not
delegate a specific function, the term includes FINRA staff to whom
the ODR Director has delegated authority. See FINRA Rules 12100(k)
and 13100(k). See also FINRA Rules 12103 and 13103.
\7\ The answer due date for the last respondent added to the
arbitration would be when the last answer is due for purposes of the
Codes.
\8\ The Codes also state that the parties will receive
employment history for the past 10 years and other background
information for each arbitrator listed. See FINRA Rules 12402,
12403, and 13403.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, when parties to an arbitration agree to extend the
deadline for when an answer is due, the ODR Director uses that new,
agreed-upon extended answer due date as the last answer due date for
sending the arbitrator list or lists to the parties.\9\ FINRA believes
that by sending the arbitrator list or lists after the original due
date for the last answer, regardless of any extension, it can shorten
the time it takes for an arbitration to conclude in those instances.
Party agreements to extend answer due dates would no longer affect the
timing of providing the arbitrator list or lists to the parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In 2015, parties requested an extension to answer in
approximately 65 percent of arbitration cases served; in 2016, the
figure was approximately 62 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rules 12402(c)(1), 12403(b)(1),
and 13403(c)(1) to provide that the ODR Director will send the list or
lists generated by NLSS to all parties at the same time, within
approximately 30 days after the last answer is due, regardless of the
parties' agreement to extend any answer due date.
As parties must return the ranked arbitrator list or lists to the
ODR Director no more than 20 days after the date upon which the ODR
Director sent the list or lists to the parties,\10\ sending the list or
lists after the original due date for the last answer would give all
parties the same amount of time to create their ranked arbitrator list
or lists. Further, FINRA believes that sending the list or lists at
this time would result in earlier arbitrator appointment and,
therefore, an earlier initial prehearing conference at which the
hearings are scheduled.\11\ In the many instances in which the parties
agree to extend an answer due date, FINRA believes the proposed rule
change would help arbitrations conclude in less time than they do under
current rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See FINRA Rules 12402(d)(3), 12403(c)(3), and 13404(d).
\11\ See FINRA Rules 12500(c) and 13500(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted in Item 2 of this filing, if the Commission approves the
proposed rule change, FINRA will announce the effective date of the
proposed rule change in a Regulatory Notice to be published no later
than 60 days following Commission approval. The effective date will be
no later than 30
[[Page 22364]]
days following publication of the Regulatory Notice announcing
Commission approval.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\12\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed rule change is consistent with Section
15A(b)(6) of the Act. The proposal would enable the parties, or their
counsel, to evaluate and rank the arbitrator list or lists at the same
time that they prepare their responses in those circumstances where the
parties request an extension to answer. Thus, the proposal would
shorten the time it takes for such arbitrations to conclude and,
thereby, make the forum more efficient and the case administration
process more expeditious for investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Where parties agree to an
extension or modification of any deadline for serving answers, the
proposal would likely result in parties, or their counsels, evaluating
the arbitrator list or lists and ranking their selections, while
simultaneously preparing their responses. Currently, these activities
occur serially. However, FINRA notes that parties often jointly request
that the ODR Director send the list or lists before the last answer due
date deadline. Therefore, FINRA believes that the proposed rule change
would not be burdensome. As noted, the benefit to parties arises from
concluding arbitrator selection earlier, thereby expediting the
arbitration process. FINRA anticipates that this proposal would impose
no significant costs to forum users.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2017-009 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2017-009. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2017-009 and should be
submitted on or before June 5, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09716 Filed 5-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P