Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil, Kazakhstan, and Norway, 19383 [2017-08535]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 80 / Thursday, April 27, 2017 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–567–569 and
731–TA–1343–1345 (Preliminary)]
Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil,
Kazakhstan, and Norway
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of silicon metal from Australia, Brazil,
and Norway, provided for in
subheadings 2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that are alleged to be
sold at less-than-fair-value (‘‘LTFV’’)
and imports of silicon metal alleged to
be subsidized by the governments of
Australia, Brazil, and Kazakhstan.
mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigations
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
investigations under sections 703(b) or
733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary
determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final
determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Apr 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Background
On March 8, 2017, Globe Specialty
Metals, Inc., Beverly, Ohio filed a
petition with the Commission and
Commerce, alleging that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
or threatened with material injury by
reason of subsidized imports of silicon
metal from Australia, Brazil, and
Kazakhstan, and LTFV imports of
silicon metal from Australia, Brazil, and
Norway. Accordingly, effective March 8,
2017, the Commission, pursuant to
sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted
countervailing duty investigation Nos.
701–TA–567–569 and antidumping
duty investigation Nos. 731–TA–1343–
1345 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of March 14, 2017 (82
FR 16353). The conference was held in
Washington, DC, on March 29, 2017,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed
and filed its determinations in these
investigations on April 24, 2017. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4685 (May 2017),
entitled Silicon Metal from Australia,
Brazil, Kazakhstan, and Norway:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–567–569 and
731–TA–1343–1345 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 24, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–08535 Filed 4–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 17–4]
Robert Clark Maiocco, M.D.; Decision
and Order
On September 22, 2016, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Robert Clark Maiocco,
M.D. (Respondent), of Denver, Colorado.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19383
The Show Cause Order proposed the
revocation of Respondent’s DEA
Certificate of Registration No.
AM2281688, and the denial of any
applications to renew or modify his
registration, as well as the denial of
‘‘any applications for any other DEA
registrations,’’ on the ground that he has
‘‘no state authority to handle controlled
substances.’’ Show Cause Order, at 1
(citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3) and
823(a)(3)).1
As to the Agency’s jurisdiction, the
Show Cause Order alleged that
Respondent is registered ‘‘as a
practitioner in Schedules II through V’’
under the above registration, at the
location of ‘‘Colorado Lipidology
Associates, 633 17th Street, Ste. 100,
Denver, Co.’’ Id. The Order alleges that
Respondent’s registration does not
expire until January 31, 2019. Id.
As to the substantive ground for the
proceeding, the Show Cause Order
alleged that ‘‘[o]n July 19, 2016, the
Colorado Medical Board suspended
[Respondent’s] medical license.’’ Id. at
2. The Show Cause Order then alleged
that Respondent is ‘‘currently without
authority to practice medicine or handle
controlled substances in the State of
Colorado, the [S]tate in which [he is]
registered with’’ DEA, and that as a
consequence, his registration is subject
to revocation.2
Following service of the Show Cause
Order, Respondent requested a hearing.
The matter was placed on the docket of
the Office of Administrative Law Judges
and assigned to ALJ Charles Wm.
Dorman who issued an order directing
the Government to file evidence
supporting the allegation and ‘‘any
motion for summary disposition’’ by 2
p.m. on November 7, 2016. Briefing
Schedule For Lack Of State Authority
Allegations (Briefing Schedule), at 1. In
1 As for the citation to 21 U.S.C. 823(a)(3), this
provision is a public interest factor applicable to
applicants for registration to manufacture schedule
I and II controlled substances, which directs the
Agency to consider the ‘‘promotion of technical
advances in the art of manufacturing these
substances and the development of new
substances.’’ This provision is not applicable to this
case, which involves a practitioner registered under
section 823(f).
While the Government also proposes the denial
of ‘‘any applications for any other DEA
registrations,’’ because this proceeding is based
solely on Respondent’s lack of state authority in
Colorado, the Agency’s authority to deny an
application is limited to an application for a
registration in Colorado.
2 The Show Cause Order also notified Respondent
of his right to request a hearing or to submit a
written statement in lieu of a hearing, the procedure
for electing either option, and the consequence of
failing to elect either option. Show Cause Order, at
2. Also, the Show Cause Order notified Respondent
of his right to submit a Corrective Action Plan. 21
U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C).
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 80 (Thursday, April 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 19383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08535]
[[Page 19383]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-567-569 and 731-TA-1343-1345 (Preliminary)]
Silicon Metal from Australia, Brazil, Kazakhstan, and Norway
Determinations
On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject
investigations, the United States International Trade Commission
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the
Act''), that there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the
United States is materially injured by reason of imports of silicon
metal from Australia, Brazil, and Norway, provided for in subheadings
2804.69.10 and 2804.69.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that are alleged to be sold at less-than-fair-value
(``LTFV'') and imports of silicon metal alleged to be subsidized by the
governments of Australia, Brazil, and Kazakhstan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commencement of Final Phase Investigations
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission's rules, the
Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of
its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of
scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided
in section 207.21 of the Commission's rules, upon notice from the
Department of Commerce (``Commerce'') of affirmative preliminary
determinations in the investigations under sections 703(b) or 733(b) of
the Act, or, if the preliminary determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the Act. Parties that filed entries
of appearance in the preliminary phase of the investigations need not
enter a separate appearance for the final phase of the investigations.
Industrial users, and, if the merchandise under investigation is sold
at the retail level, representative consumer organizations have the
right to appear as parties in Commission antidumping and countervailing
duty investigations. The Secretary will prepare a public service list
containing the names and addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the investigations.
Background
On March 8, 2017, Globe Specialty Metals, Inc., Beverly, Ohio filed
a petition with the Commission and Commerce, alleging that an industry
in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material
injury by reason of subsidized imports of silicon metal from Australia,
Brazil, and Kazakhstan, and LTFV imports of silicon metal from
Australia, Brazil, and Norway. Accordingly, effective March 8, 2017,
the Commission, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19
U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)), instituted countervailing duty
investigation Nos. 701-TA-567-569 and antidumping duty investigation
Nos. 731-TA-1343-1345 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigations and of
a public conference to be held in connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register of March 14, 2017 (82 FR 16353). The
conference was held in Washington, DC, on March 29, 2017, and all
persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission made these determinations pursuant to sections
703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It
completed and filed its determinations in these investigations on April
24, 2017. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4685 (May 2017), entitled Silicon Metal from Australia,
Brazil, Kazakhstan, and Norway: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-567-569 and
731-TA-1343-1345 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 24, 2017.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-08535 Filed 4-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
