Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 18733-18736 [2017-08011]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 76 / Friday, April 21, 2017 / Notices
Please enter through the library, located
on the corner of 15th St. and
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20230. Please note that pre-clearance
is required in order to make a statement
during the public comment portion of
the meeting. Please be sure to keep all
comments to five minutes or less, and
submit a brief statement summarizing
your comment to Craig Buerstatte (see
contact information below) no later than
11:59 p.m. ET on Friday, April 28, 2017.
Teleconference
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
May 2, 2017
Via WebEx: https://doclibraryevents.webex.com/doclibrary-events/
onstage/g.php?MTID=e409cca3fd5c1f89
e11872defbf0b82d3
Dial-In: +1 650 479 3207.
Passcode: 395 802 029.
May 3, 2017
Via WebEx: https://doclibraryevents.webex.com/doclibrary-events/
onstage/g.php?MTID=ed1e75ff9e9a7b9
bf687494cb34088f35.
Dial-In: +1 650 479 3207.
Passcode: 395 621 725.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Buerstatte, Office of Innovation
and Entrepreneurship, Room 78018,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; email: nacie@
doc.gov; telephone: +1 202 482 8001;
fax: +1 202 273 4781. Please reference
‘‘NACIE May 2017 Meeting’’ in the
subject line of your correspondence.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NACIE,
established by Section 25(c) of the
Stevenson-Wydler Technology
Innovation Act of 1980, as amended (15
U.S.C. 3720(c)), and managed by EDA’s
Office of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship (OIE), is a Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
committee that provides advice directly
to the Secretary of Commerce. NACIE’s
advice focuses on transformational
policies and programs that aim to
accelerate innovation and increase the
rate at which research is translated into
companies and jobs, including through
entrepreneurship and the development
of an increasingly skilled, globally
competitive workforce. Comprised of
successful entrepreneurs, innovators,
angel investors, venture capitalists, and
leaders from the nonprofit and academic
sectors, NACIE has presented to the
Secretary recommendations from
throughout the research-to-jobs
continuum regarding topics including
improving access to capital, growing
and connecting entrepreneurial
ecosystems, increasing small businessdriven research and development, and
understanding the workforce of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Apr 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
future. In its advisory capacity, NACIE
also serves as a vehicle for ongoing
dialogue with the innovation,
entrepreneurship, and workforce
development communities.
The final agenda for the meeting will
be posted on the NACIE Web site at
https://www.eda.gov/oie/nacie/ prior to
the meeting. Any member of the public
may submit pertinent questions and
comments concerning the NACIE’s
affairs at any time before or after the
meeting. Comments may be submitted
to the Office of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship at the contact
information below. Those unable to
attend the meetings in person but
wishing to listen to the proceedings can
do so through a conference call line
accessible via +1 650 479 3207 with
passcode 395 802 029 on May 2, 2017,
and +1 650 479 3207 with passcode 395
621 725 on May 3, 2017. Copies of the
meeting minutes will be available by
request within 90 days of the meeting
date.
Dated: April 17, 2017.
Craig Buerstatte,
Acting Director, Office of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship.
[FR Doc. 2017–08084 Filed 4–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–WH–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–912]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results of the seventh
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain new
pneumatic off-the-road tires (‘‘OTR
tires’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) and provided to
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on these preliminary results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we made certain changes in
the margin calculation regarding one
mandatory respondent, Xuzhou Xugong
Tyres Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xugong’’). We also
continue to find that the other
mandatory respondent, Guizhou Tyre
Co., Ltd. (‘‘GTC’’), is not eligible for
separate rate status and, thus, is part of
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18733
the PRC-wide entity. The final dumping
margins for this review are listed in the
‘‘Final Results’’ section of this notice,
below.
DATES:
Effective April 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amanda Mallott or Keith Haynes, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–6430 and (202) 482–5139,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 14, 2016, the Department
published its Preliminary Results of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of OTR tires from the PRC.1 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.309, we
invited interested parties to comment on
the preliminary results. On December
22, 2016, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department
extended the period for issuing the final
results of this review by sixty-days, to
April 12, 2017.2
We received case briefs from Titan
Tire Corporation and the United Steel,
Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers
International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC
(‘‘Petitioners’’), the mandatory
respondents Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Xugong’’) 3 and Guizhou Tyre Co.,
1 See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 71068 (October 14, 2016)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’) and accompanying
‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the
People’s Republic of China; 2014–2015,’’ dated
October 5, 2016 (‘‘PDM’’).
2 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh titled,
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the
People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline
for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014–2015, dated
December 22, 2016.
3 The Department previously collapsed Xugong
and its affiliates Xuzhou Armour Rubber Company
Ltd. (‘‘Armour’’) and Xuzhou Hanbang Tyre Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Hanbang’’) into a single entity; see Certain
New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires From The
People’s Republic Of China: Preliminary Results Of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014, 80 FR 61166, 61167 (October 9, 2015),
unchanged in Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires From the People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014, 81 FR 23272 (April 20, 2016).
This decision is unchallenged in the instant review;
thus, the Department continues to treat Xugong,
Armour, and Hanbang as a single entity
(collectively, ‘‘Xugong’’).
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
18734
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 76 / Friday, April 21, 2017 / Notices
Ltd. (‘‘GTC’’),4 and separate rate
applicants Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Aeolus’’) and Qingdao Free Trade
Zone Full-World International Trading
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Qingdao FTZ’’). We received
rebuttal briefs from Petitioners, Xugong,
GTC, and separate rate applicants
Zhongce Rubber Group Company
Limited (‘‘Zhongce’’) and Qingdao
Jinhaoyang International Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Jinhaoyang’’). On February 15, 2017,
the Department held a public hearing at
the request of interested parties. For a
further discussion of the events that
occurred in this investigation
subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.5
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order includes new pneumatic tires
designed for off-the-road and offhighway use, subject to certain
exceptions. The subject merchandise is
currently classifiable under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 4011.20.10.25,
4011.20.10.35, 4011.20.50.30,
4011.20.50.50, 4011.61.00.00,
4011.62.00.00, 4011.63.00.00,
4011.69.00.00, 4011.92.00.00,
4011.93.40.00, 4011.93.80.00,
4011.94.40.00, and 4011.94.80.00. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only; the written product description of
the scope of the order is dispositive. For
a complete description of the scope of
the order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
4 In the initial investigation, the Department
collapsed GTC and Guizhou Tyre Import and
Export Corporation (‘‘GTCIE’’) into a single entity,
see Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires
From the People’s Republic of China; Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination, 73 FR 9278,
9283 (February 20, 2008), unchanged in Certain
New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances, 73 FR 40485 (July 15, 2008). This
decision is unchallenged in the instant review;
thus, the Department continues to treat GTC and
GTCIE as a single entity (collectively, ‘‘GTC’’).
5 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires
from the People’s Republic of China; 2014–2015,’’
adopted by and dated concurrently with this notice
(‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Apr 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
issues that parties raised and to which
we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached as
Appendix I to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and it is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and electronic version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results,
we received a no-shipment certification
from Trelleborg Wheel Systems Hebei
Co. (‘‘TWS Hebei’’).6 Consistent with its
practice, the Department asked U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
to conduct a query on potential
shipments made by TWS Hebei during
the POR. CBP did not provide any
evidence contradicting TWS Hebei’s noshipment claim.7 No interested party
provided comments on this issue. Thus,
based on TWS Hebei’s certification and
our analysis of information received
from CBP, we determine that TWS
Hebei did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that Shiyan Desizheng
Industry & Trade Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Desizheng’’), Sailun Jinyu Group Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Sailun’’), Weifang Jintongda Tyre
Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jintongda’’), Trelleborg
Wheel Systems (Xingtai) China, Co. Ltd.
(‘‘TWS Xingtai’’), Weihai Zhongwei
Rubber Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhongwei’’),
Zhongce, Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co.
(‘‘Qihang’’), Jinhaoyang, and Qingdao
FTZ are eligible for separate-rate status.
We also preliminarily determined that
Aeolus, Tianjin Leviathan International
Trade Co., Ltd. (‘‘Leviathan’’), and GTC
were not eligible for a separate rate, and
are thus part of the PRC-wide entity.8
We made no changes to these
determinations for the final results. For
6 See
Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71068.
CBP Message Number 6207309, dated July
25, 2016.
8 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71069–70, and
accompanying PDM at the ‘‘Separate Rates’’ section.
7 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
further discussion, see Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 1.
Rate for Non-Individually-Examined
Separate Rate Companies
The statute and the Department’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be assigned to
respondents not selected for individual
examination when the Department
limits its examination of companies
subject to the administrative review
pursuant to section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the
Act. Generally, the Department looks to
section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which
provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
respondents not individually examined
in an administrative review. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a
preference for not calculating an allothers rate using rates which are zero,
de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.9 Accordingly, the
Department’s usual practice has been to
determine the dumping margin for
companies not individually examined
by averaging the weighted-average
dumping margins for the individually
examined respondents, excluding rates
that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available.10 In this
review, we have calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin for Xugong
that is above de minimis and not based
entirely on facts available. Therefore,
consistent with the Department’s
practice, we have assigned to Desizheng,
Jinhaoyang, Jintongda, Sailun, Qingdao
FTZ, Qihang, TWS Xingtai, Zhongwei,
and Zhongce the weighted-average
dumping margin calculated for Xugong
as the separate rate for this review.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on an analysis of the comments
received, we made certain calculation
changes and revisions to the valuation
of certain factors of production since the
Preliminary Results with respect to
Xugong’s margin calculation, and have
updated Xugong’s margin accordingly.
For further details on the changes made
9 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews
in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008),
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 16.
10 See, e.g., Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of
China, 71 FR 77373, 77377 (December 26, 2006),
unchanged in Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Partial Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber from the People’s Republic of
China, 72 FR 19690 (April 19, 2007).
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 76 / Friday, April 21, 2017 / Notices
since the Preliminary Results, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.11
In light of changes made since the
Preliminary Results which altered
Xugong’s margin, we have updated the
separate rate that was preliminarily
assigned to Desizheng, Jinhaoyang,
Jintongda, Sailun, Qingdao FTZ,
Qihang, TWS Xingtai, Zhongwei, and
Zhongce to reflect Xugong’s margin for
the final results.
Final Results
As a result of this administrative
review, we determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margins
exist for the period September 1, 2014,
through August 31, 2015:
Weighted-average
dumping margin
(percent)
Exporter
Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd., Armour Rubber Company Ltd., or Xuzhou Hanbang Tyre Co., Ltd ........................................
Shiyan Desizheng Industry & Trade Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................
Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................
Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd ..........................................................................................................................................................
Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................
Zhongce Rubber Group Company Limited ...................................................................................................................................
Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................
Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co ..............................................................................................................................................................
Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co., Ltd ...........................................................................................
Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) China, Co. Ltd .....................................................................................................................
The Department shall determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this
review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).12
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after the date of publication of
these final results of administrative
review.
For Xugong, the Department will
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For
customers or importers of Xugong for
which we do not have entered values,
we calculated importer- (or customer-)
specific antidumping duty assessment
amounts based on the ratio of the total
amount of dumping duties calculated
for the examined sales of subject
merchandise to the total sales quantity
of those same sales.13 For customers or
importers of Xugong for which we
received entered-value information, we
have calculated importer- (or customer) specific antidumping duty assessment
rates based on importer- (or customer-)
specific ad valorem rates.14 Where an
importer- or (customer-) specific ad
valorem rate is greater than de minimis,
the Department will instruct CBP to
collect the appropriate duties at the time
of liquidation.15 For the non-examined
separate rate companies, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate
entries at 33.08 percent. For those
entities that are subject to this review
that the Department has determined are
part of the PRC-wide entity (i.e., GTC
and GTCIE, Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd., and
Tianjin Leviathan International Trade
Co., Ltd.), we will instruct CBP to
liquidate all appropriate entries at the
PRC-wide rate of 105.31 percent.16
Pursuant to a refinement in the
Department’s non-market economy
(‘‘NME’’) practice, for entries that were
not reported in the U.S. sales databases
submitted by companies individually
examined during this review, the
Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide
rate.17 In addition, if the Department
determines that an exporter under
review had no shipments of subject
11 See also Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Final
Results of the 2014–2015 Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain New
Pneumatic off-The-Road Tires from the People’s
Republic of China: Surrogate Value Memorandum,’’
dated concurrently with this notice; and
Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2014–2015
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road
Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Analysis
of the Final Results Margin Calculation for Xuzhou
Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with
this notice.
12 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103
(February 14, 2012) (‘‘NME Antidumping
Proceedings’’).
13 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Additionally, as in the Preliminary
Results, the Department determines that
Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. and Guizhou
Tyre Import and Export Corporation,
Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd., and Tianjin
Leviathan International Trade Co., Ltd.,
are part of the PRC-wide entity.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed regarding these final results
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Apr 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
18735
Sfmt 4703
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
33.08
merchandise, any suspended entries
that entered under that exporter’s case
number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will
be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
For the exporters listed above, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
identified in the ‘‘Final Results’’ section
of this notice, above; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters that are not under review
in this segment of the proceeding but
that received a separate rate in a
previous segment, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate (or exporter-producer chain rate)
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding in
which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for
all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not been
found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 105.31 percent; and (4) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
14 Id.
15 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
PRC-wide rate was determined in Certain
New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 80 FR 20197 (April 15, 2015).
17 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
16 The
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
18736
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 76 / Friday, April 21, 2017 / Notices
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping and/or countervailing
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping and/
or countervailing duties occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these
final results of administrative review in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Appendix
Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes since the Preliminary Results
V. List of Comments
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Separate Rates
A. Whether to Grant Aeolus a Separate
Rate
B. Whether to Grant GTC a Separate Rate
C. Whether to Grant Jinhaoyang a Separate
Rate
D. Whether to Grant Zhongce a Separate
Rate
Comment 2: Calculation of the Cost of
Tube and Flap Inputs for Xugong
Comment 3: Surrogate Value for Smoked
Sheet Natural Rubber
Comment 4: Surrogate Value for Inland
Truck Freight
Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Carbon
Black
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Apr 20, 2017
Jkt 241001
Comment 6: Surrogate Value for Tire
Valves
Comment 7: Warehousing Expense
Calculation for Xugong
Comment 8: Whether to Adjust Xugong’s
U.S. Prices for Irrecoverable Value
Added Tax
Comment 9: Additional Comments Raised
by GTC
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–08011 Filed 4–20–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Impact of Long Term Evolution Signals
on Global Positioning System
Receivers
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
The National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST)
announces that National Advanced
Spectrum and Communications Test
Network (NASCTN) will hold a public
meeting on May 4, 2017 to inform the
public about the NASCTN project
‘‘Impact of Long Term Evolution (LTE)
signals on Global Positioning System
(GPS) Devices’’. At this meeting, the
public will learn about this project, as
described in the report released to the
public on February 15, 2017, available
at: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/
TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.1952.pdf. A
summary of NASCTN’s test
methodology and an overview of the test
results will be provided as well.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Thursday, May 4, 2017, from 9:00 a.m.
to 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. To attend
the meeting in person you must register
in advance by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
on Tuesday, May 2, 2017. In order to
access the WebEx you must register in
advance by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on
Wednesday, May 3, 2017. For
instructions on how to register to
participate in the meeting, please see
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
MITRE Campus, Building 1, 7525
Colshire Drive, McLean VA, 22102.
Directions to the MITRE McLean
Campus are available at: https://
www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/pdf/
mclean-campus-map.pdf. The meeting
will also be accessible via WebEx.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about this public meeting
contact: Dr. Sheryl Genco,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Communications Technology
Laboratory, NIST by email at
sheryl.genco@nist.gov; telephone (303–
497–3591) or fax (303–497–6665).
Please direct media inquiries to the
NIST Public Affairs Officer, Laura Ost
by email at laura.ost@nist.gov or
telephone (303–497–4880).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NASCTN
provides a neutral forum for addressing
spectrum-sharing challenges to
accelerate the deployment of wireless
technologies among commercial and
federal users. NASCTN was created in
2015 and is a joint effort among NIST,
the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, and the
United States Department of Defense.
NASCTN’s mission is to provide robust
test processes and validated
measurement data necessary to develop,
evaluate and deploy spectrum sharing
technologies that can increase access to
the spectrum by both Federal agencies
and non-federal spectrum users.
NASCTN conducts projects with private
sector entities via Cooperative Research
and Development Agreements
(CRADA).1 NASCTN has completed the
‘‘Impacts of LTE Signals on GPS
Receivers’’ project and released the
NASCTN report ‘‘LTE Impacts on GPS’’
on February 15, 2017. The report
describes the project, the test
methodology and the test results and is
available at: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/
nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/
NIST.TN.1952.pdf.
The focus of this NASCTN project,
proposed by Ligado Networks in 2016
and conducted under a CRADA between
NIST and Ligado Networks, was the
development of a test methodology to:
(1) Investigate the impact of LTE signals
on GPS devices that operate in the GPS
L1 frequency band; and (2) perform
radiated radio-frequency measurements
on a representative set of GPS devices
to validate the test methodology.
At the start of the project, NASCTN
convened a panel of technical experts to
develop a test plan with the following
objectives: Develop a test plan that is
transparent, reproducible, and wellcalibrated; develop sound, statisticallyvalid data retrieval and processing
techniques; provide a clear path from
measurement setup, to data collection,
to processed results; and provide data to
inform discussions between different
interested parties on proper
measurement requirements. The goal
1 A CRADA is the principal mechanism used by
Federal laboratories to engage in collaborative
efforts with non-Federal entities and allow the
exchange of resources with private industry to
advance technologies that can then be
commercialized for the benefit of the public and the
U.S. economy.
E:\FR\FM\21APN1.SGM
21APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 76 (Friday, April 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18733-18736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08011]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-912]
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce (Commerce).
SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') published the preliminary results of the seventh
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain new
pneumatic off-the-road tires (``OTR tires'') from the People's Republic
of China (``PRC'') and provided to interested parties an opportunity to
comment on these preliminary results. Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made certain changes in the margin calculation
regarding one mandatory respondent, Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd.
(``Xugong''). We also continue to find that the other mandatory
respondent, Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. (``GTC''), is not eligible for
separate rate status and, thus, is part of the PRC-wide entity. The
final dumping margins for this review are listed in the ``Final
Results'' section of this notice, below.
DATES: Effective April 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amanda Mallott or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-6430 and (202) 482-5139,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 14, 2016, the Department published its Preliminary
Results of the antidumping duty administrative review of OTR tires from
the PRC.\1\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309, we invited interested
parties to comment on the preliminary results. On December 22, 2016, in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``the Act''), the Department extended the period for issuing
the final results of this review by sixty-days, to April 12, 2017.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 71068 (October 14, 2016)
(``Preliminary Results'') and accompanying ``Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's Republic
of China; 2014-2015,'' dated October 5, 2016 (``PDM'').
\2\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh titled, Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China:
Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, dated December 22, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We received case briefs from Titan Tire Corporation and the United
Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied
Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
(``Petitioners''), the mandatory respondents Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co.,
Ltd. (``Xugong'') \3\ and Guizhou Tyre Co.,
[[Page 18734]]
Ltd. (``GTC''),\4\ and separate rate applicants Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd.
(``Aeolus'') and Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International
Trading Co., Ltd. (``Qingdao FTZ''). We received rebuttal briefs from
Petitioners, Xugong, GTC, and separate rate applicants Zhongce Rubber
Group Company Limited (``Zhongce'') and Qingdao Jinhaoyang
International Co., Ltd. (``Jinhaoyang''). On February 15, 2017, the
Department held a public hearing at the request of interested parties.
For a further discussion of the events that occurred in this
investigation subsequent to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Department previously collapsed Xugong and its
affiliates Xuzhou Armour Rubber Company Ltd. (``Armour'') and Xuzhou
Hanbang Tyre Co., Ltd. (``Hanbang'') into a single entity; see
Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires From The People's Republic
Of China: Preliminary Results Of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013-2014, 80 FR 61166, 61167 (October 9, 2015), unchanged
in Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires From the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013-2014, 81 FR 23272 (April 20, 2016). This decision is
unchallenged in the instant review; thus, the Department continues
to treat Xugong, Armour, and Hanbang as a single entity
(collectively, ``Xugong'').
\4\ In the initial investigation, the Department collapsed GTC
and Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Corporation (``GTCIE'') into a
single entity, see Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires From the
People's Republic of China; Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 73 FR
9278, 9283 (February 20, 2008), unchanged in Certain New Pneumatic
Off-The-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 73 FR
40485 (July 15, 2008). This decision is unchallenged in the instant
review; thus, the Department continues to treat GTC and GTCIE as a
single entity (collectively, ``GTC'').
\5\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Certain New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires from the People's
Republic of China; 2014-2015,'' adopted by and dated concurrently
with this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order includes new pneumatic tires
designed for off-the-road and off-highway use, subject to certain
exceptions. The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'')
subheadings: 4011.20.10.25, 4011.20.10.35, 4011.20.50.30,
4011.20.50.50, 4011.61.00.00, 4011.62.00.00, 4011.63.00.00,
4011.69.00.00, 4011.92.00.00, 4011.93.40.00, 4011.93.80.00,
4011.94.40.00, and 4011.94.80.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product
description of the scope of the order is dispositive. For a complete
description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties
in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached as Appendix I to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and electronic version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Determination of No Shipments
As noted in the Preliminary Results, we received a no-shipment
certification from Trelleborg Wheel Systems Hebei Co. (``TWS
Hebei'').\6\ Consistent with its practice, the Department asked U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to conduct a query on potential
shipments made by TWS Hebei during the POR. CBP did not provide any
evidence contradicting TWS Hebei's no-shipment claim.\7\ No interested
party provided comments on this issue. Thus, based on TWS Hebei's
certification and our analysis of information received from CBP, we
determine that TWS Hebei did not have any reviewable transactions
during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71068.
\7\ See CBP Message Number 6207309, dated July 25, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that Shiyan Desizheng
Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. (``Desizheng''), Sailun Jinyu Group Co.,
Ltd. (``Sailun''), Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd. (``Jintongda''),
Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) China, Co. Ltd. (``TWS Xingtai''),
Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. (``Zhongwei''), Zhongce, Qingdao
Qihang Tyre Co. (``Qihang''), Jinhaoyang, and Qingdao FTZ are eligible
for separate-rate status. We also preliminarily determined that Aeolus,
Tianjin Leviathan International Trade Co., Ltd. (``Leviathan''), and
GTC were not eligible for a separate rate, and are thus part of the
PRC-wide entity.\8\ We made no changes to these determinations for the
final results. For further discussion, see Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71069-70, and accompanying
PDM at the ``Separate Rates'' section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Individually-Examined Separate Rate Companies
The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be assigned to respondents not selected for
individual examination when the Department limits its examination of
companies subject to the administrative review pursuant to section
777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section
735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the
all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the
rate for respondents not individually examined in an administrative
review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act articulates a preference for
not calculating an all-others rate using rates which are zero, de
minimis, or based entirely on facts available.\9\ Accordingly, the
Department's usual practice has been to determine the dumping margin
for companies not individually examined by averaging the weighted-
average dumping margins for the individually examined respondents,
excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts
available.\10\ In this review, we have calculated a weighted-average
dumping margin for Xugong that is above de minimis and not based
entirely on facts available. Therefore, consistent with the
Department's practice, we have assigned to Desizheng, Jinhaoyang,
Jintongda, Sailun, Qingdao FTZ, Qihang, TWS Xingtai, Zhongwei, and
Zhongce the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Xugong as
the separate rate for this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews in Part, 73 FR
52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 16.
\10\ See, e.g., Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical
Circumstances: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's
Republic of China, 71 FR 77373, 77377 (December 26, 2006), unchanged
in Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Partial
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain
Polyester Staple Fiber from the People's Republic of China, 72 FR
19690 (April 19, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on an analysis of the comments received, we made certain
calculation changes and revisions to the valuation of certain factors
of production since the Preliminary Results with respect to Xugong's
margin calculation, and have updated Xugong's margin accordingly. For
further details on the changes made
[[Page 18735]]
since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See also Memorandum to the File, ``Final Results of the
2014-2015 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Certain New Pneumatic off-The-Road Tires from the People's Republic
of China: Surrogate Value Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this
notice; and Memorandum to the File, ``2014-2015 Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain New Pneumatic Off-
the-Road Tires from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of the
Final Results Margin Calculation for Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co.,
Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of changes made since the Preliminary Results which
altered Xugong's margin, we have updated the separate rate that was
preliminarily assigned to Desizheng, Jinhaoyang, Jintongda, Sailun,
Qingdao FTZ, Qihang, TWS Xingtai, Zhongwei, and Zhongce to reflect
Xugong's margin for the final results.
Final Results
As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period
September 1, 2014, through August 31, 2015:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-average
Exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd., Armour Rubber Company 33.08
Ltd., or Xuzhou Hanbang Tyre Co., Ltd...............
Shiyan Desizheng Industry & Trade Co., Ltd........... 33.08
Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co., Ltd............ 33.08
Sailun Jinyu Group Co., Ltd.......................... 33.08
Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd...................... 33.08
Zhongce Rubber Group Company Limited................. 33.08
Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd...................... 33.08
Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co............................... 33.08
Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International 33.08
Trading Co., Ltd....................................
Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) China, Co. Ltd.... 33.08
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, as in the Preliminary Results, the Department
determines that Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Tyre Import and
Export Corporation, Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Leviathan
International Trade Co., Ltd., are part of the PRC-wide entity.
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these
final results within five days of the date of publication of this
notice to parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
The Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\12\ The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of these final results of
administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012)
(``NME Antidumping Proceedings'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Xugong, the Department will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total
entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For
customers or importers of Xugong for which we do not have entered
values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific antidumping
duty assessment amounts based on the ratio of the total amount of
dumping duties calculated for the examined sales of subject merchandise
to the total sales quantity of those same sales.\13\ For customers or
importers of Xugong for which we received entered-value information, we
have calculated importer- (or customer-) specific antidumping duty
assessment rates based on importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem
rates.\14\ Where an importer- or (customer-) specific ad valorem rate
is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect
the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\15\ For the non-
examined separate rate companies, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all
appropriate entries at 33.08 percent. For those entities that are
subject to this review that the Department has determined are part of
the PRC-wide entity (i.e., GTC and GTCIE, Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd., and
Tianjin Leviathan International Trade Co., Ltd.), we will instruct CBP
to liquidate all appropriate entries at the PRC-wide rate of 105.31
percent.\16\ Pursuant to a refinement in the Department's non-market
economy (``NME'') practice, for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such
entries at the PRC-wide rate.\17\ In addition, if the Department
determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject
merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter's
case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the
PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\14\ Id.
\15\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\16\ The PRC-wide rate was determined in Certain New Pneumatic
Off-the-Road Tires From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR
20197 (April 15, 2015).
\17\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
identified in the ``Final Results'' section of this notice, above; (2)
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that
are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that
received a separate rate in a previous segment, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the exporter-specific rate (or exporter-producer
chain rate) published for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide
rate of 105.31 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC
[[Page 18736]]
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's
presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping and/or countervailing
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing these final results of administrative
review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes since the Preliminary Results
V. List of Comments
VI. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Separate Rates
A. Whether to Grant Aeolus a Separate Rate
B. Whether to Grant GTC a Separate Rate
C. Whether to Grant Jinhaoyang a Separate Rate
D. Whether to Grant Zhongce a Separate Rate
Comment 2: Calculation of the Cost of Tube and Flap Inputs for
Xugong
Comment 3: Surrogate Value for Smoked Sheet Natural Rubber
Comment 4: Surrogate Value for Inland Truck Freight
Comment 5: Surrogate Value for Carbon Black
Comment 6: Surrogate Value for Tire Valves
Comment 7: Warehousing Expense Calculation for Xugong
Comment 8: Whether to Adjust Xugong's U.S. Prices for
Irrecoverable Value Added Tax
Comment 9: Additional Comments Raised by GTC
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-08011 Filed 4-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
