Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 18432-18434 [2017-07926]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
18432
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Notices
submitting factual information, must
specify under which subsection of 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is
being submitted and, if the information
is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. Time
limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR
351.301, which provides specific time
limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Parties
should review the regulations prior to
submitting factual information in these
investigations.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of
time limits before the expiration of a
time limit established under Part 351, or
as otherwise specified by the Secretary.
In general, an extension request will be
considered untimely if it is filed after
the expiration of the time limit
established under Part 351 expires. For
submissions that are due from multiple
parties simultaneously, an extension
request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date.
Under certain circumstances, we may
elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be
considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties
simultaneously. In such a case, we will
inform parties in the letter or
memorandum setting forth the deadline
(including a specified time) by which
extension requests must be filed to be
considered timely. An extension request
must be made in a separate, stand-alone
submission; under limited
circumstances we will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time
limits. Review Extension of Time Limits;
Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20,
2013), available at https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/201322853.htm, prior to submitting factual
information in these investigations.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.48
Parties are hereby reminded that revised
certification requirements are in effect
for company/government officials, as
well as their representatives.
Investigations initiated on the basis of
Petitions filed on or after August 16,
2013, and other segments of any AD or
CVD proceedings initiated on or after
48 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Apr 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
August 16, 2013, should use the formats
for the revised certifications provided at
the end of the Final Rule.49 The
Department intends to reject factual
submissions if the submitting party does
not comply with applicable revised
certification requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Parties wishing to participate
in these investigations should ensure
that they meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of
appearance as discussed in 19 CFR
351.103(d)).
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 732 and 777(i) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigations
The product covered by these
investigations is biodiesel, which is a fuel
comprised of mono-alkyl esters of long chain
fatty acids derived from vegetable oils or
animal fats, including biologically-based
waste oils or greases, and other biologicallybased oil or fat sources. The investigations
cover biodiesel in pure form (B100) as well
as fuel mixtures containing at least 99
percent biodiesel by volume (B99). For fuel
mixtures containing less than 99 percent
biodiesel by volume, only the biodiesel
component of the mixture is covered by the
scope of the investigations.
Biodiesel is generally produced to
American Society for Testing and Materials
International (ASTM) D6751 specifications,
but it can also be made to other
specifications. Biodiesel commonly has one
of the following Chemical Abstracts Service
(CAS) numbers, generally depending upon
the feedstock used: 67784–80–9 (soybean oil
methyl esters); 91051–34–2 (palm oil methyl
esters); 91051–32–0 (palm kernel oil methyl
esters); 73891–99–3 (rapeseed oil methyl
esters); 61788–61–2 (tallow methyl esters);
68990–52–3 (vegetable oil methyl esters);
129828–16–6 (canola oil methyl esters);
67762–26–9 (unsaturated alkylcarboxylic
acid methyl ester); or 68937–84–8 (fatty
acids, C12–C18, methyl ester).
49 See
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration during Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The B100 product subject to the
investigations is currently classifiable under
subheading 3826.00.1000 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS), while the B99 product is currently
classifiable under HTSUS subheading
3826.00.3000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings, ASTM specifications, and CAS
numbers are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of
the scope is dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2017–07900 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–844]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Final Determination of No
Shipments; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the 2014–2015 administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on narrow woven ribbons with
woven selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan.
The review covers four producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise, of
which the Department selected two
companies for individual examination,
Roung Shu Industry Corporation (Roung
Shu) and A-Madeus Textile Ltd. (AMadeus). The period of review (POR) is
September 1, 2014, through August 31,
2015. We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results and, based upon our
analysis of the comments, our final
results remain unchanged from the
preliminary results. The final dumping
margins are listed below in the section
entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’
DATES: Effective April 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 14, 2016, the Department
published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register.1 A summary of the
1 See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven
Selvedge from Taiwan; Preliminary Results of
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Notices
events that occurred since the
Department published the Preliminary
Results, as well as a full discussion of
the issues raised for these final results,
may be found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.2 The Department
conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this
order 3 is narrow woven ribbons with
woven selvedge. The merchandise
subject to this order is classifiable under
the harmonized tariff schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) statistical
categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030;
5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject
merchandise also may enter under
subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20;
5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00;
5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10;
5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80
and under statistical categories
5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080;
5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The
HTSUS statistical categories and
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
merchandise covered by this order is
dispositive.4
Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we
preliminarily determined that Xiamen
Yi He and Fujian Rongshu had no
reviewable transactions during the POR.
We received no comments from
interested parties with respect to these
preliminary results and we continue to
determine that these companies had no
reviewable transactions during the
POR.5
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
The sole issue raised in the case brief
is addressed in the Issues and Decision
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014–
2015, 81 FR 71057 (October 14, 2016) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review on
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from
Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven
Selvedge from Taiwan and the People’s Republic of
China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR
56982 (Sept. 17, 2010) (Orders).
4 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum.
5 For a full explanation of the Department’s
analysis, see Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71058,
and accompanying Prelminary Determination
Memorandum, at 5–6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Apr 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
Memorandum. A list of the topics
discussed and the issue which parties
raised and to which we respond in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum is
attached to this notice as Appendix I.
The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
18433
that the merchandise was destined for
the United States, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.
For A-Madeus, we will base the
assessment rate, which was assigned as
an adverse facts available rate,8 for the
corresponding entries on the margin
listed above. Additionally, because the
Department determined that Xiamen Yi
He and Fujian Rongshu had no
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries
that entered under their name will be
liquidated at the all-others rate effective
during the period of review.9
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
Final Results of the Review
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
We are assigning the following
from warehouse, for consumption on or
weighted-average dumping margins to
after the date of publication, as provided
the firms listed below:
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rates for Roung Shu
Weightedand A-Madeus will be equal to the
average
dumping margins established in the
Producer/exporter
dumping
margins
final results of this administrative
(percent)
review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, a zero cash deposit rate will be
Roung Shu Industry Corporation .............................
0.00 required for that company); (2) for
A-Madeus Textile Ltd ...........
137.20 merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a
Assessment Rates
prior segment of the proceeding, the
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
company-specific rate published for the
Department has determined, and U.S.
most recently-completed segment; (3) if
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
review, a prior review, or the original
appropriate entries of subject
less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
merchandise and deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable, in accordance investigation, but the manufacturer is,
with the final results of this review. The the cash deposit rate will be the rate
Department intends to issue appropriate established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding
assessment instructions directly to CBP
for the manufacturer of the
15 days after publication of the final
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
results of this administrative review.
Pursuant to the Final Modification for rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 4.37
Reviews,6 because Roung Shu’s
percent, the all-others rate determined
weighted-average dumping margin is
in the LTFV investigation.10 These cash
zero, we will instruct CBP to liquidate
the appropriate entries without regard to deposit requirements, when imposed,
antidumping duties,7 pursuant to 19
8 For a full discussion of the Department’s
CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries of subject
determination to apply adverse facts available
merchandise during the POR produced
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see
by Roung Shu for which it did not know Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1.
6 See
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
7 Id., 77 FR at 8102.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
See also Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71058, and
accompanying Prelminary Determination
Memorandum, at 14–18.
9 For a full discussion of this clarification, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
10 See Orders, 75 FR at 56985.
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
18434
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 74 / Wednesday, April 19, 2017 / Notices
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculation
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Rate Assigned to A-Madeus
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–07926 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; NIST MEP Client
Impact Survey
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Apr 18, 2017
Jkt 241001
I. Abstract
Sponsored by NIST, the
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
(MEP) is a national network of locally
based manufacturing extension centers
working with small manufacturers to
assist them improve their productivity,
improve profitability and enhance their
economic competitiveness. The
information collected will provide the
MEP with information regarding MEP
Center performance regarding the
delivery of technology, and business
solutions to U.S.-based manufacturers.
The collected information will assist in
determining the performance of the
MEP Centers at both local and national
levels, provide information critical to
monitoring and reporting on MEP
programmatic performance, and assist
management in policy decisions.
Responses to the collection of
information are mandatory per the
regulations governing the operation of
the MEP Program (15 CFR parts 290,
291, 292, and H.R. 1274—section 2).
The information collected will include
MEP Customer inputs regarding their
sales, costs, investments, employment,
and exports. Customers will take the
survey online. Customers will only be
surveyed once per year under this
collection. Data collected in this survey
is confidential.
II. Method of Collection
Information will be collected
electronically.
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before June 19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Megean Blum,
megean.blum@nist.gov, 301–975–3160.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0693–0021.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,667.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: 0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sheleen Dumas,
PRA Departmental Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–07885 Filed 4–18–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF203
Determination of Overfishing or an
Overfished Condition
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This action serves as a notice
that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary), has found that
the following stocks are subject to
overfishing or overfished: South
Atlantic golden tilefish and the Western
and Central Pacific stock of Pacific
bigeye tuna are subject to overfishing;
South Atlantic blueline tilefish is still
subject to overfishing; and Pacific
bluefin tuna in the North Pacific Ocean
and South Atlantic red snapper are still
both overfished and subject to
overfishing. NMFS, on behalf of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18432-18434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07926]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-844]
Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 14, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary results of the 2014-2015
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on narrow
woven ribbons with woven selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan. The review covers
four producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, of which the
Department selected two companies for individual examination, Roung Shu
Industry Corporation (Roung Shu) and A-Madeus Textile Ltd. (A-Madeus).
The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2014, through August 31,
2015. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results and, based upon our analysis of the comments, our
final results remain unchanged from the preliminary results. The final
dumping margins are listed below in the section entitled ``Final
Results of the Review.''
DATES: Effective April 19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 14, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary
Results in the Federal Register.\1\ A summary of the
[[Page 18433]]
events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary
Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised for these
final results, may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.\2\ The Department conducted
this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan;
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 71057
(October 14, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review on
Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order \3\ is narrow woven ribbons
with woven selvedge. The merchandise subject to this order is
classifiable under the harmonized tariff schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) statistical categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050
and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under subheadings
5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00;
5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and
under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090;
and 6307.90.9889. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written
description of the merchandise covered by this order is dispositive.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge from Taiwan and
the People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75
FR 56982 (Sept. 17, 2010) (Orders).
\4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily determined that Xiamen
Yi He and Fujian Rongshu had no reviewable transactions during the POR.
We received no comments from interested parties with respect to these
preliminary results and we continue to determine that these companies
had no reviewable transactions during the POR.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For a full explanation of the Department's analysis, see
Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71058, and accompanying Prelminary
Determination Memorandum, at 5-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
The sole issue raised in the case brief is addressed in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics discussed and the issue
which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of the Review
We are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margins to
the firms listed below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margins
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roung Shu Industry Corporation.......................... 0.00
A-Madeus Textile Ltd.................................... 137.20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject merchandise and deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable, in accordance with the final results of this
review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
Pursuant to the Final Modification for Reviews,\6\ because Roung
Shu's weighted-average dumping margin is zero, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping
duties,\7\ pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by Roung Shu for which it did not
know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate if
there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the
transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012)
(Final Modification for Reviews).
\7\ Id., 77 FR at 8102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For A-Madeus, we will base the assessment rate, which was assigned
as an adverse facts available rate,\8\ for the corresponding entries on
the margin listed above. Additionally, because the Department
determined that Xiamen Yi He and Fujian Rongshu had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR, any suspended entries that entered
under their name will be liquidated at the all-others rate effective
during the period of review.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For a full discussion of the Department's determination to
apply adverse facts available pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of
the Act, see Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comment 1. See also
Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 71058, and accompanying Prelminary
Determination Memorandum, at 14-18.
\9\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates
for Roung Shu and A-Madeus will be equal to the dumping margins
established in the final results of this administrative review (except,
if the rate is zero or de minimis, a zero cash deposit rate will be
required for that company); (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review
but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of
this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 4.37 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV
investigation.\10\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed,
[[Page 18434]]
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Orders, 75 FR at 56985.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: April 12, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculation
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Rate Assigned to A-Madeus
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-07926 Filed 4-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
