Certain Digital Cable and Satellite Products, Set-Top Boxes, Gateways and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation, 18310-18311 [2017-07733]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
18310
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 18, 2017 / Notices
connection with their presentation at
the conference. All written submissions
must conform with the provisions of
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules;
any submissions that contain BPI must
also conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the investigations
must be served on all other parties to
the investigations (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with these
investigations must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will acknowledge that any information
that it submits to the Commission
during these investigations may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of these or related investigations or
reviews, or (b) in internal investigations,
audits, reviews, and evaluations relating
to the programs, personnel, and
operations of the Commission including
under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by
U.S. government employees and
contract personnel, solely for
cybersecurity purposes. All contract
personnel will sign appropriate
nondisclosure agreements.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Authority: These investigations are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.12 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–07749 Filed 4–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Apr 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1049]
Certain Digital Cable and Satellite
Products, Set-Top Boxes, Gateways
and Components Thereof; Institution
of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 10, 2017, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Sony Corporation of Japan and
Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego,
California. A letter supplementing the
complaint was filed on March 28, 2017.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain digital cable and satellite
products, set-top boxes, gateways, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. RE45,126 (‘‘the ’126 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,467,093 (‘‘the ’093
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,032,919 (‘‘the
’919 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,556,221
(‘‘the ’221 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
6,915,525 (‘‘the ’525 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
April 11, 2017, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain digital cable and
satellite products, set-top boxes,
gateways, and components thereof by
reason of infringement of one or more of
claim 26 of the ’126 patent; claims 1, 3,
and 8 of the ’093 patent; claims 1–16 of
the ’919 patent; claims 1–6 and 12–16
of the ’221 patent; and claims 1, 3–5, 7,
8, 34, 36, and 37 of the ’525 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding Administrative Law Judge
shall take evidence or other information
and hear arguments from the parties or
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Sony Corporation, 1–7–1 Konan,
Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108–0075, Japan
Sony Electronics Inc., 16530 Via
Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
ARRIS International plc, 3871 Lakefield
Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Group, Inc., 3871 Lakefield
Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 18, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
ARRIS Technology, Inc., 101
Tournament Drive, Horsham, PA
19044
ARRIS Enterprises LLC, 3871 Lakefield
Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Solutions, Inc., 3871 Lakefield
Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Global Ltd. (formerly Pace Ltd.),
Victoria Road, Saltaire, West
Yorkshire BD18 3LF, England
Pace Americas, LLC, 3701 FAU
Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL
33431
Pace Americas Holdings, Inc., 3701 FAU
Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL
33431
Pace USA LLC, 3701 FAU Boulevard,
Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Pace Americas Investments LLC, 3701
FAU Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca
Raton, FL 33431
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Apr 17, 2017
Jkt 241001
Issued: April 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–07733 Filed 4–17–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Investigation
[OMB Number 1110–0057]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension
Without Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection; Uniform Crime
Reporting Data Collection Instrument
Pretesting and Burden Estimation
General Clearance
Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Criminal Justice Information
Services Division (CJIS), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until June
19, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All
comments, suggestions, or questions
regarding additional information, to
include obtaining a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Mrs. Amy C. Blasher, Unit
Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Information Services Division,
Module E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road,
Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306;
facsimile (304) 625–3566.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18311
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information
collection:
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Uniform Crime Reporting Data
Collection Instrument Pretesting and
Burden Estimation General Clearance.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
The form number is 1110–0057. The
applicable component within the
Department of Justice is the Criminal
Justice Information Services Division, in
the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, state,
tribal and federal law enforcement
agencies. Abstract: This clearance
provides the UCR Program the ability to
conduct pretests which evaluate the
validity and reliability of information
collection instruments and determine
the level of burden state and local
agencies have in reporting crime data to
the FBI. The Paperwork Reduction Act
only allows for nine respondents in
pretesting activities. This clearance
request expands the pretesting sample
to 30 people for each of the twelve
information collections administered by
the UCR Program. Further, the clearance
will allow for a brief 5-minute cost and
burden assessment for the 18,000 law
enforcement agencies participating in
the UCR Program.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: UCR Participation Burden
Estimation: There are approximately
18,000 law enforcement respondents;
calculated estimates indicate five
minutes per submission. UCR Form
Pretesting: There are approximately 300
respondents; calculated estimates
indicate one hour per pretest.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are approximately
1,800 hours, annual burden, associated
with this information collection.
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18310-18311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07733]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1049]
Certain Digital Cable and Satellite Products, Set-Top Boxes,
Gateways and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on March 10, 2017, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Sony
Corporation of Japan and Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego,
California. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on March 28,
2017. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital
cable and satellite products, set-top boxes, gateways, and components
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
RE45,126 (``the '126 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,467,093 (``the '093
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,032,919 (``the '919 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 6,556,221 (``the '221 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 6,915,525
(``the '525 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on April 11, 2017, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital
cable and satellite products, set-top boxes, gateways, and components
thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of claim 26 of the
'126 patent; claims 1, 3, and 8 of the '093 patent; claims 1-16 of the
'919 patent; claims 1-6 and 12-16 of the '221 patent; and claims 1, 3-
5, 7, 8, 34, 36, and 37 of the '525 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1),
the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall take evidence or other
information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1),
(f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
Sony Electronics Inc., 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
ARRIS International plc, 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Group, Inc., 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
[[Page 18311]]
ARRIS Technology, Inc., 101 Tournament Drive, Horsham, PA 19044
ARRIS Enterprises LLC, 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Solutions, Inc., 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024
ARRIS Global Ltd. (formerly Pace Ltd.), Victoria Road, Saltaire, West
Yorkshire BD18 3LF, England
Pace Americas, LLC, 3701 FAU Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Pace Americas Holdings, Inc., 3701 FAU Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca
Raton, FL 33431
Pace USA LLC, 3701 FAU Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33431
Pace Americas Investments LLC, 3701 FAU Boulevard, Suite 200, Boca
Raton, FL 33431
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-07733 Filed 4-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
