Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 17631-17633 [2017-07364]

Download as PDF 17631 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–857] Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances and Notice of Amended Final Determination Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 16, 2017, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) entered final judgment sustaining the final results of remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of Commerce (Department) pertaining to the less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation of certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from India. The Department is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department’s final determination in the LTFV investigation of OCTG from India. DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES Background On July 18, 2014, the Department published its final determination of sales at LTFV and final negative determination of critical circumstances in this proceeding.1 The Department reached affirmative determinations for mandatory respondents GVN Fuels Limited (GVN) and Jindal SAW, Limited (Jindal SAW). U.S. Steel appealed the Final Determination to the CIT, and on May 5, 2016, the CIT sustained, in part, and remanded, in part, the Final Determination.2 The court remanded the Final Determination to the Department with respect to its differential pricing analysis, specifically the Department’s application and explanation of its ratio 1 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Certain Oil Country Tubular Good from India, 79 FR 41981 (July 18, 2014) (Final Determination). 2 See United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 179 F. Supp. 3d 1114 (CIT 2016) (US Steel). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Apr 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 test in this case, for further explanation and consideration.3 Further, the court remanded for further explanation and consideration the Department’s determinations that: (1) Jindal SAW was unaffiliated with certain suppliers of inputs; (2) Jindal SAW’s yield loss data reasonably reflected its costs of production; and (3) the highest COP in GVN’s cost database should be assigned to its dual-grade products.4 On August 31, 2016, the Department issued its final results of redetermination pursuant to remand in accordance with the CIT’s order.5 On remand, the Department revised the weighted-average dumping margins for both GVN and Jindal SAW. On March 16, 2017, the CIT sustained the Department’s Final Redetermination.6 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,7 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,8 the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department must publish a notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Department determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s March 16, 2017, judgment constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with the Department’s Final Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, the Department will continue suspension of liquidation of subject merchandise pending expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. Exporter or producer GVN Fuels Limited ... Jindal SAW, Limited Weighted-average dumping margins (percentage) 1.07 (de minimis). 11.24. With respect to GVN, because we have calculated a de minimis weightedaverage dumping margin, in the event the court’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, the Department will amend the order to exclude GVN’s entries from further suspension of liquidation and will order all entries currently suspended to be liquidated without regard to dumping duties. Amended Cash Deposit Rates Neither GVN nor Jindal SAW have a superseding cash deposit rate (e.g., from an administrative review) and, therefore, the Department will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. For Jindal SAW, the revised cash deposit rate will be the rate indicated above, effective March 26, 2017. For GVN, because the revised weighted-average dumping margin is de minimis, the revised cash deposit rate will be zero, effective March 26, 2017. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: April 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–07362 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Amended Final Determination Because there is now a final court decision, the Department is amending the Final Determination with respect to GVN and Jindal SAW. The revised weighted-average dumping margins for GVN and Jindal SAW for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013, are as follows: 3 See US Steel, 179 F. Supp. 3d at 1120. 4 Id. 5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand, United States Steel Corporation et al. and Maverick Tube Corporation et al. v. United States, Consolidated Court No. 14–00263, dated August 31, 2017 (Final Redetermination). 6 See United States Steel Corporation et al. v. United States, Slip Op. 17–28, Consolidated Court No. 14–00263 (CIT 2017). 7 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 8 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–520–803] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This review AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1 17632 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise, JBF RAK LLC (JBF). Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made changes to the preliminary results, which are discussed below. The final weightedaverage dumping margin is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ DATES: Effective April 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On December 9, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results.1 On January 9, 2017, the Department received a timely-filed case brief from JBF.2 No other party filed a case or rebuttal brief. Period of Review The period of review is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film (PET Film), whether extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film is also excluded. PET Film is classifiable under subheading 3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES All issues raised in the sole case brief filed in this review are addressed in the 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 89061 (December 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results). 2 See ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet and Strip from the United Arab Emirates (A– 520–803); Case Brief of JBF RAK, LLC,’’ dated January 9, 2017. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Apr 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, room B–8024. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum is also accessible on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to our margin calculations for JBF. A complete discussion of these changes can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Administrative Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the period of November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015: Producer or Exporter Weighted-average dumping margin (percent ad valorem) JBF RAK LLC ................. 7.91 Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.4 The Department intends to issue appropriate 3 See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with and herby adopted by this notice. 4 The Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. For assessment purposes, we calculated importer-specific, ad valorem assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of those same sales.5 We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) For JBF, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the section ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review;’’ (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a previously completed segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in the final results for the most recent period in which that producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be that established for the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in the final results for the most recent period in which that producer participated; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this review or in any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be 4.05 percent, the all-others rate established in the less than fair value investigation.6 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We will disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with these final results within five days of the publication of 5 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Brazil, the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 66596 (November 10, 2008). 6 See E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 12, 2017 / Notices this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(b). DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Notification to Importers [A–570–849] This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: April 6, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—Issues in the Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Home Market Invoice Dates Comment 2: Home Market Commissions IV. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2017–07364 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:45 Apr 11, 2017 Jkt 241001 Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Circumvention Inquiry Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the antidumping circumvention inquiry on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL plate’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) that was initiated on February 10, 2016. DATES: Effective April 12, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 2, 2003, the Department published an antidumping duty order on CTL plate from the PRC.1 On February 10, 2016, in response to a request from Nucor Corporation and SSAB Enterprises LLC (collectively, ‘‘Domestic Producers’’), the Department initiated a circumvention inquiry regarding the Order with respect to certain CTL plate with small amounts of specific alloying elements (chromium, titanium, and boron where there was no heat treatment).2 On December 5, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for issuing the final determination in this circumvention inquiry until April 5, 2017.3 Subsequently, on March 20, 2017, the Department published antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain carbon and alloy steel CTL plate from the PRC.4 On March 23, 1 See Suspension Agreement on Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon Steel Plate From the People’s Republic of China; Termination of Suspension Agreement and Notice of Antidumping Duty Order, 68 FR 60081 (October 21, 2003) (‘‘Order’’). 2 See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People ’s Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on Antidumping Duty Order, 81 FR 8173 (February 18, 2016). 3 See Extension of Deadline for Final Determination for Anticircumvention Inquiry, dated December 5, 2016. 4 See Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-ToLength Plate From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); see also Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel CutTo-Length Plate From the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 82 FR 14346 (March 20, 2017) (‘‘CTL Alloy Steel Orders’’). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 17633 2017, the Department issued a letter notifying interested parties of its intent to rescind this antidumping circumvention inquiry on CTL plate from the PRC.5 In that letter, the Department provided interested parties an opportunity to comment on its intention to rescind this antidumping circumvention inquiry.6 No parties commented on the letter. Rescission of Antidumping Circumvention Inquiry As noted above, this antidumping circumvention inquiry pertains to certain CTL plate products from the PRC containing specified levels of alloying elements. However, there are now antidumping and countervailing duty orders on CTL plate from the PRC made of alloy steel, specifically ‘‘certain carbon and alloy steel hot-rolled or forged flat plate products not in coils, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances (cut-to-length plate).’’ 7 Therefore, the Department is rescinding the instant circumvention inquiry, as this inquiry concerned products now covered by the CTL Alloy Steel Orders. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 781 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.225. Dated: April 5, 2017. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary, Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–07285 Filed 4–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 5 See Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate (‘‘CTL plate’’) From the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’): Intent to Rescind Antidumping Circumvention Inquiry, dated March 23, 2017 (‘‘Letter of Intent to Rescind’’). 6 See id at 2. 7 See CTL Alloy Steel Orders. E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM 12APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17631-17633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-803]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From the United 
Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, 
sheet, and strip (PET Film) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This 
review

[[Page 17632]]

covers one producer/exporter of subject merchandise, JBF RAK LLC (JBF). 
Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we made 
changes to the preliminary results, which are discussed below. The 
final weighted-average dumping margin is listed below in the section 
entitled ``Final Results of Review.''

DATES: Effective April 12, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 9, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ On January 9, 2017, the Department received a timely-filed 
case brief from JBF.\2\ No other party filed a case or rebuttal brief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 89061 (December 9, 2016) 
(Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet and Strip 
from the United Arab Emirates (A-520-803); Case Brief of JBF RAK, 
LLC,'' dated January 9, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Review

    The period of review is November 1, 2014, through October 31, 2015.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pre-
treated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film (PET Film), whether 
extruded or co-extruded. Excluded are metallized films and other 
finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by 
the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer 
more than 0.00001 inches thick. Also excluded is roller transport 
cleaning film which has at least one of its surfaces modified by 
application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR latex. Tracing and drafting film 
is also excluded. PET Film is classifiable under subheading 
3920.62.00.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is 
dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the sole case brief filed in this review are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ A list of the 
issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is appended to 
this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is available electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit of the main Commerce Building, room B-8024. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum is also 
accessible on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, 
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, 
``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from the United Arab Emirates: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,'' (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with and herby adopted by 
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to 
our margin calculations for JBF. A complete discussion of these changes 
can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period of November 1, 
2014, through October 31, 2015:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-average
                                                        dumping margin
                Producer or Exporter                      (percent ad
                                                           valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JBF RAK LLC.........................................               7.91
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review.\4\ The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Department applied the assessment rate calculation 
method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 
Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 
14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For assessment purposes, we calculated importer-specific, ad 
valorem assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of 
dumping calculated for the examined sales to the total entered value of 
those same sales.\5\ We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries covered by this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final 
results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act): (1) For JBF, the cash deposit rate will be equal 
to the weighted-average dumping margin listed above in the section 
``Final Results of the Administrative Review;'' (2) for merchandise 
exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a previously completed segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published in 
the final results for the most recent period in which that producer or 
exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in 
this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be that established for 
the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in 
the final results for the most recent period in which that producer 
participated; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a 
firm covered in this review or in any previously completed segment of 
this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be 4.05 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the less than fair value 
investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
Brazil, the People's Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates: 
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value for the United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595, 
66596 (November 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose to interested parties the calculations performed 
in connection with these final results within five days of the 
publication of

[[Page 17633]]

this notice, consistent with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these final results and this notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: April 6, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--Issues in the Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Home Market Invoice Dates
    Comment 2: Home Market Commissions
IV. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2017-07364 Filed 4-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P