Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 17507-17508 [2017-07165]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 11, 2017 / Notices
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice, DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS, accessible through
www.dot.gov/privacy. In order to
facilitate comment tracking and
response, we encourage commenters to
provide their name, or the name of their
organization; however, submission of
names is completely optional. Whether
or not commenters identify themselves,
all timely comments will be fully
considered. If you wish to provide
comments containing proprietary or
confidential information, please contact
the agency for alternate submission
instructions.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: April 4, 2017.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017–07221 Filed 4–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0023; Notice 1]
Porsche Cars North America, Inc.,
Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Porsche Cars North America,
Inc. (PCNA), on behalf of Dr. Ing. h.c.F.
Porsche AG (PAG), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2017 Porsche
911 Turbo and Porsche 911 Turbo
Cabriolet motor vehicles do not fully
comply with Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 101,
Controls and Displays, and FMVSS No.
135, Light Vehicle Brake Systems. PCNA
filed a noncompliance report dated
March 16, 2017. PCNA also petitioned
NHTSA on March 17, 2017, for a
decision that the subject noncompliance
is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 11, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:18 Apr 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Porsche Cars North
America, Inc. (PCNA), on behalf of Dr.
Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG (PAG), has
determined that certain model year
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17507
(MY) 2017 Porsche 911 Turbo and
Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet motor
vehicles do not fully comply with
paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101,
Controls and Displays, and paragraph
S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135, Light Vehicle
Brake Systems. PCNA filed a
noncompliance report dated March 16,
2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. PCNA also
petitioned NHTSA on March 17, 2017,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of PCNA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
17 MY 2017 Porsche 911 Turbo and
Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet motor
vehicles, manufactured between May
31, 2016, and January 11, 2017, are
potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance: PCNA explains
that the noncompliance is that the
telltales used for Brake Warning, Park
Brake Warning and Antilock Braking
System (ABS) failure warnings are
displayed using International
Organization for Standardization (ISO)
symbols instead of the words ‘‘Brake’’
and ‘‘ABS’’ as required by paragraph
S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101 and paragraph
S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.2.1 of
FMVSS No. 101 requires in pertinent
part:
S5.2.1 Except for the Low Tire Pressure
Telltale, each control, telltale and indicator
that is listed in column 1 of Table 1 or Table
2 must be identified by the symbol specified
for it in column 2 or the word or abbreviation
specified for it in column 3 of Table 1 or
Table 2. If a symbol is used, each symbol
provided pursuant to this paragraph must be
substantially similar in form to the symbol as
it appears in Table 1 or Table 2. If a symbol
is used, each symbol provided pursuant to
this paragraph must have the proportional
dimensional characteristics of the symbol as
it appears in Table 1 or Table 2 . . .
Paragraphs S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135
requires in pertinent part:
S5.5.5. Labeling. (a) Each visual indicator
shall display a word or words in accordance
with the requirements of Standard No. 101
(49 CFR 571.101) and this section, which
shall be legible to the driver under all
daytime and nighttime conditions when
activated. Unless otherwise specified, the
words shall have letters not less than 3.2 mm
(1/8 inch) high and the letters and
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
17508
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 11, 2017 / Notices
background shall be of contrasting colors,
one of which is red. Words or symbols in
addition to those required by Standard No.
101 and this section may be provided for
purposes of clarity.
(b) Vehicles manufactured with a split
service brake system may use a common
brake warning indicator to indicate two or
more of the functions described in S5.5.1(a)
through S5.5.1(g). If a common indicator is
used, it shall display the word ‘‘Brake .’’. . .
(d) If separate indicators are used for one
or more of the conditions described in
S5.5.1(a) through S5.5.1(g), the indicators
shall display the following wording: . . .
(3) If a separate indicator is provided for
the condition specified in S5.5.1(b), the
letters and background shall be of contrasting
colors, one of which is yellow. The indicator
shall be labeled with the words ‘‘Antilock’’
or ‘‘Anti-lock’’ or ‘‘ABS’’; or ‘‘Brake
Proportioning,’’ in accordance with Table 2
of Standard No. 101 . . .
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
V. Summary of PCNA’s Petition:
PCNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, PCNA
submitted the following reasoning:
(a) The Owner’s Manual for the subject
vehicles is written for multiple markets and
depicts both the ‘‘BRAKE’’ and ISO symbols
telltales for brake warning, as well as the
‘‘ABS’’ and ISO symbol telltales for ABS
lamp.
(b) The ISO symbol for ABS lamp also
contains the word ‘‘ABS’’, which is
additionally embedded in a circle with two
vertical lines. In case of an illumination of
the ISO symbol, the malfunction display,
located in the instrument cluster, will
display an additional warning message that
states ‘‘ABS/PSM failure. Drive with caution’’
and an initial warning chime will sound.
Porsche believes that in the event the ISO
ABS telltale is displayed, the driver would
recognize a possible ABS malfunction.
(c) In the event the brake fluid level in the
master cylinder reservoir is less than the
recommended safe level, the ISO symbol will
illuminate, and the multifunction display
will display a warning message that states
‘‘Brake fluid level. Park vehicle safely’’ and
an initial warning chime will sound. The
message will stay continuously displayed,
provided there are no other serious
message(s), which would result in the
messages being displayed in an alternating
manner. If the brake fluid is still low on
subsequent ignition key cycles the message
will be redisplayed in the message center.
(d) The parking brake in the subject
vehicles are set by pushing a button labelled
‘‘P’’, which is located on the left hand side
of the steering wheel. Once the parking brake
is set, a red light indicator located in the
button will illuminate. Thus the application
of the parking brake is in full view of the
operator. When the parking brake is engaged
it illuminates the ISO symbol and should the
operator proceed with the parking brake
engaged, the parking brake releases
automatically if the following prerequisites
are fulfilled:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:18 Apr 10, 2017
Jkt 241001
1. Engine is running;
2. Driver’s door is closed;
3. Driver’s seat belt is fastened.
If one of these prerequisites is not fulfilled,
the electric parking brake is not
automatically released when the operator
attempts to drive off. A message appears on
the multifunction display, and the red light
indicator in the button as well as the ISO
symbol for the brake will flash.
(e) In all cases the ISO symbols for the
brake and ABS telltale illuminate and remain
illuminated in accordance with the
requirements of FMVSS No. 135.
(f) Porsche is unaware of any field or
owner complaints regarding the issue of noncompliant telltales.
PCNA concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that PCNA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after PCNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8)
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–07165 Filed 4–10–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0023; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming Model
Year 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
Passenger Cars (PC) Are Eligible for
Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that model year
(MY) 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Passenger
Cars (PC) that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
standards (FMVSS), are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
PC) and they are capable of being
readily altered to conform to the
standards.
SUMMARY:
The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 11, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17507-17508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2017-0023; Notice 1]
Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA), on behalf of Dr. Ing.
h.c.F. Porsche AG (PAG), has determined that certain model year (MY)
2017 Porsche 911 Turbo and Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet motor vehicles
do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 101, Controls and Displays, and FMVSS No. 135, Light Vehicle Brake
Systems. PCNA filed a noncompliance report dated March 16, 2017. PCNA
also petitioned NHTSA on March 17, 2017, for a decision that the
subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle
safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is May 11, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Porsche Cars North America, Inc. (PCNA), on behalf of
Dr. Ing. h.c.F. Porsche AG (PAG), has determined that certain model
year (MY) 2017 Porsche 911 Turbo and Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet motor
vehicles do not fully comply with paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101,
Controls and Displays, and paragraph S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135, Light
Vehicle Brake Systems. PCNA filed a noncompliance report dated March
16, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. PCNA also petitioned NHTSA on March 17,
2017, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of PCNA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 17 MY 2017 Porsche 911 Turbo
and Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet motor vehicles, manufactured between
May 31, 2016, and January 11, 2017, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance: PCNA explains that the noncompliance is that
the telltales used for Brake Warning, Park Brake Warning and Antilock
Braking System (ABS) failure warnings are displayed using International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) symbols instead of the words
``Brake'' and ``ABS'' as required by paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101
and paragraph S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101 requires in
pertinent part:
S5.2.1 Except for the Low Tire Pressure Telltale, each control,
telltale and indicator that is listed in column 1 of Table 1 or
Table 2 must be identified by the symbol specified for it in column
2 or the word or abbreviation specified for it in column 3 of Table
1 or Table 2. If a symbol is used, each symbol provided pursuant to
this paragraph must be substantially similar in form to the symbol
as it appears in Table 1 or Table 2. If a symbol is used, each
symbol provided pursuant to this paragraph must have the
proportional dimensional characteristics of the symbol as it appears
in Table 1 or Table 2 . . .
Paragraphs S5.5.5 of FMVSS No. 135 requires in pertinent part:
S5.5.5. Labeling. (a) Each visual indicator shall display a word
or words in accordance with the requirements of Standard No. 101 (49
CFR 571.101) and this section, which shall be legible to the driver
under all daytime and nighttime conditions when activated. Unless
otherwise specified, the words shall have letters not less than 3.2
mm (1/8 inch) high and the letters and
[[Page 17508]]
background shall be of contrasting colors, one of which is red.
Words or symbols in addition to those required by Standard No. 101
and this section may be provided for purposes of clarity.
(b) Vehicles manufactured with a split service brake system may
use a common brake warning indicator to indicate two or more of the
functions described in S5.5.1(a) through S5.5.1(g). If a common
indicator is used, it shall display the word ``Brake .''. . .
(d) If separate indicators are used for one or more of the
conditions described in S5.5.1(a) through S5.5.1(g), the indicators
shall display the following wording: . . .
(3) If a separate indicator is provided for the condition
specified in S5.5.1(b), the letters and background shall be of
contrasting colors, one of which is yellow. The indicator shall be
labeled with the words ``Antilock'' or ``Anti-lock'' or ``ABS''; or
``Brake Proportioning,'' in accordance with Table 2 of Standard No.
101 . . .
V. Summary of PCNA's Petition: PCNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, PCNA submitted the following reasoning:
(a) The Owner's Manual for the subject vehicles is written for
multiple markets and depicts both the ``BRAKE'' and ISO symbols
telltales for brake warning, as well as the ``ABS'' and ISO symbol
telltales for ABS lamp.
(b) The ISO symbol for ABS lamp also contains the word ``ABS'',
which is additionally embedded in a circle with two vertical lines.
In case of an illumination of the ISO symbol, the malfunction
display, located in the instrument cluster, will display an
additional warning message that states ``ABS/PSM failure. Drive with
caution'' and an initial warning chime will sound. Porsche believes
that in the event the ISO ABS telltale is displayed, the driver
would recognize a possible ABS malfunction.
(c) In the event the brake fluid level in the master cylinder
reservoir is less than the recommended safe level, the ISO symbol
will illuminate, and the multifunction display will display a
warning message that states ``Brake fluid level. Park vehicle
safely'' and an initial warning chime will sound. The message will
stay continuously displayed, provided there are no other serious
message(s), which would result in the messages being displayed in an
alternating manner. If the brake fluid is still low on subsequent
ignition key cycles the message will be redisplayed in the message
center.
(d) The parking brake in the subject vehicles are set by pushing
a button labelled ``P'', which is located on the left hand side of
the steering wheel. Once the parking brake is set, a red light
indicator located in the button will illuminate. Thus the
application of the parking brake is in full view of the operator.
When the parking brake is engaged it illuminates the ISO symbol and
should the operator proceed with the parking brake engaged, the
parking brake releases automatically if the following prerequisites
are fulfilled:
1. Engine is running;
2. Driver's door is closed;
3. Driver's seat belt is fastened.
If one of these prerequisites is not fulfilled, the electric
parking brake is not automatically released when the operator
attempts to drive off. A message appears on the multifunction
display, and the red light indicator in the button as well as the
ISO symbol for the brake will flash.
(e) In all cases the ISO symbols for the brake and ABS telltale
illuminate and remain illuminated in accordance with the
requirements of FMVSS No. 135.
(f) Porsche is unaware of any field or owner complaints
regarding the issue of non-compliant telltales.
PCNA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that PCNA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after PCNA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-07165 Filed 4-10-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P