Hyundai Motor America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 17072-17073 [2017-06954]
Download as PDF
17072
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Notices
condition the following warnings would
occur, conditioning the driver over time
as to the purpose of the telltale, message
and audible alerts and under what
conditions they are activated.
• Red contrasting color of the telltale
saying ‘‘BRAKE’’
• Message on the display screen that
says ‘‘LOW AIR!’’
• Audible alert to the driver as long as
the vehicle has low air
• Air gauges for the primary and
secondary air tanks clearly showing
the air pressure in the system
• Red contrasting color on the air
gauges indicating when the pressure
is low
• Difficulty/inability of releasing the
parking brakes with low air
• Reduced drivability if the driver
attempts to drive with the parking
brakes applied
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
2. Moving Vehicle
If a low brake air pressure situation
occurs while driving, the function of the
service brakes may be reduced or lost
and, eventually if the pressure gets low
enough, the parking brakes will engage.
The driver must pull to the side of the
road and apply the parking brakes as
soon as possible. A loss of brake air
pressure while driving represents a
malfunctioning brake system and
requires immediate action from the
driver. Drivers recognize that a telltale
illuminated in red represents a
malfunction which needs to be
remedied.
The following warning would occur if
a low air condition occurred while
driving.
• Red contrasting color of the telltale
saying ‘‘BRAKE’’
• Message on the display screen that
says ‘‘LOW AIR!’’
• Audible alert to the driver as long as
the vehicle has low air
• Air gauges for the primary and
secondary air tanks clearly showing
the air pressure in the system
• Red contrasting color on the air
gauges indicating when the pressure
is low.
(e) The functionality of both the
parking brake system and the service
brake system remains unaffected by the
‘‘BRAKE’’ telltale used in the subject
vehicles.
(f) NHTSA Precedents—DTNA notes
that NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for decisions of
inconsequential noncompliance for
similar brake telltale issues. See Docket
No. NHTSA–2012–0004, 78 FR 69931
(November 21, 2013) (grant of petition
for Ford Motor Company) and Docket
No. NHTSA–2014–0046, 79 FR 78559
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
(December 30, 2014 (grant of petition for
Chrysler Group, LLC). In both of these
instances, the vehicles at issue did not
have the exact wording as required
under FMVSS No. 101. The available
warnings were deemed sufficient to
provide the necessary driver warning.
DTNA respectfully suggest that the same
is true for the subject vehicles: The red
‘‘BRAKE’’ telltale and the ‘‘LOW AIR!’’
pop-up message, together with other
warnings and alerts, are fully sufficient
to warn the driver of a low brake air
pressure situation.
DTNA concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that DTNA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after DTNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–06953 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0142; Notice 1]
Hyundai Motor America, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Hyundai Motor America
(Hyundai) has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2012–2016 Hyundai
Accent motor vehicles do not fully
comply with Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208,
Occupant Crash Protection. Hyundai
filed a noncompliance information
report dated December 12, 2016.
Hyundai also petitioned NHTSA on
December 16, 2016, for a decision that
the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 8, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
nlaroche on DSK30NT082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Notices
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Hyundai Motor America
(Hyundai), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2012–2016 Hyundai
Accent motor vehicles do not fully
comply with paragraph S4.1.5.5.2 of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 208, Occupant Crash
Protection. Hyundai filed a
noncompliance information report
dated December 12, 2016, pursuant to
49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports. Hyundai also petitioned
NHTSA on December 16, 2016,
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Hyundai’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately
6,445 MY 2012–2016 Hyundai Accent
motor vehicles manufactured between
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:52 Apr 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
May 19, 2011, and July 7, 2016, are
potentially involved. The affected
vehicles are those equipped with a nonfolding rear seat back and sold in the
Puerto Rico and Guam markets.
III. Noncompliance: Hyundai explains
that the noncompliance is that the
affected vehicles are equipped with a
non-folding rear seat back and a center
rear seat belt incorporating a release
mechanism that detaches both the lap
and shoulder portion at the lower
anchorage point and therefore do not
meet the requirements of paragraph
S4.1.5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 208. Under
FMVSS No. 208, a detachable seat belt
in the middle seat is allowed only in
vehicles with a folding rear seat.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.1.5.5.2 of
FMVSS No. 208 states in pertinent part:
S4.1.5.5.2 Any inboard designated seating
position on a seat for which the entire seat
back can be folded (including the head
restraints and any other part of the vehicle
attached to the seat back) such that no part
of the seat back extends above a horizontal
plane located 250mm above the highest SRP
located on the seat may meet the
requirements of S4.1.5.5.1 by use of a belt
incorporating a release mechanism that
detaches both the lap and shoulder portion
at either the upper or lower anchorage point,
but not both. The means of detachment shall
be a key or key-like object . . .
V. Summary of Hyundai’s Petition:
Hyundai described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, Hyundai
submitted the following reasoning:
1. The affected vehicles are equipped
with a non-folding rear seat back and a center
rear seat belt incorporating a release
mechanism that detaches both the lap and
shoulder portion at the lower anchorage
point to allow improved assembly line
procedures.
2. Hyundai first became aware of the
possibility that the center rear seat belts of
the subject vehicles may not comply with
S4.1.5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 208 as a result of
internal ‘‘port inspections’’ of certain model
year 2016 Hyundai Accent vehicles. A
subsequent investigation revealed previous
model year ‘‘RB’’ platform Accent vehicles
are similarly affected.
3. Hyundai pointed out that 5-door and 4door Hyundai Accent vehicles equipped with
rear folding seats are not affected.
4. The Accent vehicles in question fully
comply with FMVSS No. 208 and FMVSS
No. 209 requirements with the sole exception
that the lap and shoulder portion of the rear
center seat belt may be detached from the
lower anchorage by use of a tool, such as a
key or key-like object.
5. Hyundai states that if the rear seat back
of the subject vehicles were capable of being
folded (which Hyundai claims would have
no effect on seat belt performance) the
detachable aspect would not result in a
compliance issue.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
17073
6. The Owner’s Manual in the subject
vehicles contains relevant information and
illustrations to fasten, unfasten, and
disconnect the rear center belt.
7. Hyundai states that it is clear from the
intended difficulty in detaching the seat belt
and the instructions contained in the
Owner’s Manual that the seat belt should not
be detached. Further, in the Accent with a
fixed rear seat back, there is no advantage or
reason for the owner to detach the center rear
seat belt from the lower anchorage.
8. Hyundai does not believe that it is
appropriate to conduct a recall campaign to
replace the center rear seat belts in vehicles
that have been delivered to customers.
9. Hyundai stated that they are not aware
of any accidents or injuries related to the
subject noncompliance.
Hyundai concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that Hyundai no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after Hyundai notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8).
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–06954 Filed 4–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 66 (Friday, April 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17072-17073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06954]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0142; Notice 1]
Hyundai Motor America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai) has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2012-2016 Hyundai Accent motor vehicles do not fully
comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208,
Occupant Crash Protection. Hyundai filed a noncompliance information
report dated December 12, 2016. Hyundai also petitioned NHTSA on
December 16, 2016, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is May 8, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive
[[Page 17073]]
confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were received,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Hyundai Motor America (Hyundai), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2012-2016 Hyundai Accent motor vehicles do not
fully comply with paragraph S4.1.5.5.2 of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection. Hyundai filed a
noncompliance information report dated December 12, 2016, pursuant to
49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
Hyundai also petitioned NHTSA on December 16, 2016, pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an exemption from
the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on
the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Hyundai's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 6,445 MY 2012-2016 Hyundai
Accent motor vehicles manufactured between May 19, 2011, and July 7,
2016, are potentially involved. The affected vehicles are those
equipped with a non-folding rear seat back and sold in the Puerto Rico
and Guam markets.
III. Noncompliance: Hyundai explains that the noncompliance is that
the affected vehicles are equipped with a non-folding rear seat back
and a center rear seat belt incorporating a release mechanism that
detaches both the lap and shoulder portion at the lower anchorage point
and therefore do not meet the requirements of paragraph S4.1.5.5.2 of
FMVSS No. 208. Under FMVSS No. 208, a detachable seat belt in the
middle seat is allowed only in vehicles with a folding rear seat.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.1.5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 208 states in
pertinent part:
S4.1.5.5.2 Any inboard designated seating position on a seat for
which the entire seat back can be folded (including the head
restraints and any other part of the vehicle attached to the seat
back) such that no part of the seat back extends above a horizontal
plane located 250mm above the highest SRP located on the seat may
meet the requirements of S4.1.5.5.1 by use of a belt incorporating a
release mechanism that detaches both the lap and shoulder portion at
either the upper or lower anchorage point, but not both. The means
of detachment shall be a key or key-like object . . .
V. Summary of Hyundai's Petition: Hyundai described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, Hyundai submitted the following
reasoning:
1. The affected vehicles are equipped with a non-folding rear
seat back and a center rear seat belt incorporating a release
mechanism that detaches both the lap and shoulder portion at the
lower anchorage point to allow improved assembly line procedures.
2. Hyundai first became aware of the possibility that the center
rear seat belts of the subject vehicles may not comply with
S4.1.5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 208 as a result of internal ``port
inspections'' of certain model year 2016 Hyundai Accent vehicles. A
subsequent investigation revealed previous model year ``RB''
platform Accent vehicles are similarly affected.
3. Hyundai pointed out that 5-door and 4-door Hyundai Accent
vehicles equipped with rear folding seats are not affected.
4. The Accent vehicles in question fully comply with FMVSS No.
208 and FMVSS No. 209 requirements with the sole exception that the
lap and shoulder portion of the rear center seat belt may be
detached from the lower anchorage by use of a tool, such as a key or
key-like object.
5. Hyundai states that if the rear seat back of the subject
vehicles were capable of being folded (which Hyundai claims would
have no effect on seat belt performance) the detachable aspect would
not result in a compliance issue.
6. The Owner's Manual in the subject vehicles contains relevant
information and illustrations to fasten, unfasten, and disconnect
the rear center belt.
7. Hyundai states that it is clear from the intended difficulty
in detaching the seat belt and the instructions contained in the
Owner's Manual that the seat belt should not be detached. Further,
in the Accent with a fixed rear seat back, there is no advantage or
reason for the owner to detach the center rear seat belt from the
lower anchorage.
8. Hyundai does not believe that it is appropriate to conduct a
recall campaign to replace the center rear seat belts in vehicles
that have been delivered to customers.
9. Hyundai stated that they are not aware of any accidents or
injuries related to the subject noncompliance.
Hyundai concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that Hyundai no
longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve
vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer
for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after Hyundai
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: Delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-06954 Filed 4-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P