Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 16165-16166 [2017-06492]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters. If the interested party intends
for the Secretary to review sales of
merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which was produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011), the Department
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders.2
The Department no longer considers
the non-market economy (NME) entity
2 See
also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
as an exporter conditionally subject to
an antidumping duty administrative
reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity
will not be under review unless the
Department specifically receives a
request for, or self-initiates, a review of
the NME entity.4 In administrative
reviews of antidumping duty orders on
merchandise from NME countries where
a review of the NME entity has not been
initiated, but where an individual
exporter for which a review was
initiated does not qualify for a separate
rate, the Department will issue a final
decision indicating that the company in
question is part of the NME entity.
However, in that situation, because no
review of the NME entity was
conducted, the NME entity’s entries
were not subject to the review and the
rate for the NME entity is not subject to
change as a result of that review
(although the rate for the individual
exporter may change as a function of the
finding that the exporter is part of the
NME entity).
Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
when there is no review requested of the
NME entity, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were
suspended at the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’)
on Enforcement and Compliance’s
ACCESS Web site at https://
access.trade.gov.5 Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i),
a copy of each request must be served
on the petitioner and each exporter or
producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of April 2017. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of April 2017, a request for review
3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16165
of entries covered by an order, finding,
or suspended investigation listed in this
notice and for the period identified
above, the Department will instruct CBP
to assess antidumping or countervailing
duties on those entries at a rate equal to
the cash deposit of (or bond for)
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: March 24, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–06491 Filed 3–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May
2017
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in April 2017
and will appear in that month’s Notice
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
16166
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset
Reviews (‘‘Sunset Reviews’’).
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Foundry Coke from China (A–570–862) (3rd Review) ...................................................................
High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China (A–570–977) (1st Review) ..........................................
Tin Mill Products from China (A–588–854) (3rd Review) ...............................................................
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Matthew Renkey, (202) 482–2312.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–5255.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China (C–570–978) (1st Review) .........................................
Suspended Investigations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
No Sunset Review of suspended
investigations is scheduled for initiation
in May 2017.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews provides further information
regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
International Trade Administration
Dated: March 24, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2017–06492 Filed 3–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[C–570–043]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From
the People’s Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC),
the Department is issuing a
countervailing duty order on stainless
steel sheet and strip from the People’s
Republic of China.
DATES: Effective April 3, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Spencer Toubia; AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0123.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
In accordance with sections 705(d)
and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.210(c), on February 8, 2017, the
Department published its final
determination in the countervailing
duty investigation of stainless steel
sheet and strip (stainless sheet and
strip) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC).1 On March 24, 2017, the
ITC notified the Department of its final
determination that an industry in the
United States is materially injured by
reason of subsidized imports of subject
merchandise from the PRC within the
meaning of section 705(b)(1)(A)(i) of the
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination,
and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances
Determination, in Part, 82 FR 9714 (February 8,
2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:47 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Robert James, (202) 482–0649.
Act, and its determination that critical
circumstances do not exist with respect
to imports of subject merchandise from
the PRC.2
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
stainless steel sheet and strip. For a
complete description of the scope of the
order, see Appendix I.
Countervailing Duty Order
In accordance with sections
705(b)(1)(A)(i) and 705(d) of the Act, the
ITC notified the Department of its final
determinations that the industry in the
United States producing stainless sheet
and strip is materially injured by reason
of subsidized imports of stainless sheet
and strip from the PRC and that critical
circumstances do not exist with respect
to imports of subject merchandise from
the PRC that are subject to the
Department’s affirmative critical
circumstances findings. Therefore, in
accordance with section 705(c)(2) of the
Act, we are publishing this
countervailing duty order.
As a result of the ITC’s final
determination, in accordance with
section 706(a) of the Act, the
Department will direct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess,
upon further instruction by the
Department, countervailing duties on
unliquidated entries of stainless steel
sheet and strip entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after July 18, 2016, the date on which
the Department published its
preliminary countervailing duty
determination in the Federal Register,3
2 See Letter to Ronald Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Rhonda K. Schmidtlein,
Chairman of the U.S. International Trade
Commission, regarding stainless steel sheet and
strip from the People’s Republic of China (March
24, 2017). See also Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip
from China, Investigation Nos. 701–TA–557 and
731–TA–1312 (Final), USITC Publication 4676
(March 2017).
3 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 62 (Monday, April 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16165-16166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06492]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for May 2017
The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in April
2017 and will appear in that month's Notice
[[Page 16166]]
of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews (``Sunset Reviews'').
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department contact
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foundry Coke from China (A-570-862) (3rd Matthew Renkey, (202) 482-
Review). 2312.
High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China (A- Matthew Renkey, (202) 482-
570-977) (1st Review). 2312.
Tin Mill Products from China (A-588-854) (3rd Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
Review). (202) 482-5255.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
High Pressure Steel Cylinders from China (C- Robert James, (202) 482-
570-978) (1st Review). 0649.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for
initiation in May 2017.
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Reviews provides further information regarding what is
required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: March 24, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017-06492 Filed 3-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
