Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 16223-16226 [2017-06427]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
Nominations must be received
by July 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Melanie O’Brien,
Designated Federal Officer, Native
American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Review Committee,
National NAGPRA Program (2253),
National Park Service, 1849 C Street
NW., Room 7360, Washington, DC
20240, (202) 354–2201 or via email
nagpra_dfo@nps.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie O’Brien, Designated Federal
Officer, Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Review
Committee, National NAGPRA Program
(2253), National Park Service, 1849 C
Street NW., Room 7360, Washington,
DC 20240, (202) 354–2201 or via email
nagpra_dfo@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Review Committee is responsible for:
1. Monitoring the NAGPRA inventory
and identification process;
2. Reviewing and making findings
related to the identity or cultural
affiliation of cultural items, or the return
of such items;
3. Facilitating the resolution of
disputes;
4. Compiling an inventory of
culturally unidentifiable human
remains and developing a process for
disposition of such remains;
5. Consulting with Indian tribes and
Native Hawaiian organizations and
museums on matters within the scope of
the work of the Review Committee
affecting such tribes or organizations;
6. Consulting with the Secretary of the
Interior in the development of
regulations to carry out NAGPRA; and
7. Making recommendations regarding
future care of repatriated cultural items.
The Review Committee consists of
seven members appointed by the
Secretary of the Interior. The Secretary
may not appoint Federal officers or
employees to the Review Committee.
Three members are appointed from
nominations submitted by Indian tribes,
Native Hawaiian organizations, or
traditional Native American religious
leaders. At least two of these members
must be traditional Indian religious
leaders. Three members are appointed
from nominations submitted by national
museum or scientific organizations. One
member is appointed from a list of
persons developed and consented to by
all of the other members.
Members serve as Special
Government Employees and are
required to complete annual ethics
training. Members are appointed for 4year terms and incumbent members may
be reappointed for 2-year terms. The
Review Committee’s work is completed
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
during public meetings. The Review
Committee attempts to meet in person
twice a year and meetings normally last
two or three days. The Review
Committee may hold one or more public
teleconferences of several hours
duration.
The Review Committee members
serve without pay but reimbursed for
each day of meeting attendance. Review
Committee members are also
reimbursed for travel expenses incurred
in association with Review Committee
meetings (25 U.S.C. 3006(b)(4)).
Additional information regarding the
Review Committee, including the
Review Committee’s charter, meeting
protocol, and dispute resolution
procedures, is available on the National
NAGPRA Program Web site, at
www.nps.gov/NAGPRA/REVIEW/.
Individuals who are federally
registered lobbyists are ineligible to
serve on all FACA and non-FACA
boards, committees, or councils in an
individual capacity. The term
‘‘individual capacity’’ refers to
individuals who are appointed to
exercise their own individual best
judgment on behalf of the government,
such as when they are designated
Special Government Employees, rather
than being appointed to represent a
particular interest.
Nominations must:
1. Be submitted by an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization on the
official letterhead of the Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization.
2. If submitted by an Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization, affirm
that the signatory is the official
authorized by the Indian tribe or Native
Hawaiian organization to submit the
nomination.
3. If submitted by a Native American
traditional religious leader, affirm that
the signatory meets the definition of
traditional Native American religious
leader.
4. Provide the nominator’s original
signature, daytime telephone number,
and email address.
5. Include the nominee’s full legal
name, home address, home telephone
number, and email address.
Nominations should include the
nominee’s resume providing an
adequate description of a nominee’s
qualifications, including information
that would enable the Department of the
Interior to make an informed decision
regarding meeting the membership
requirements of the Committee and
permit the Department of the Interior to
contact a potential member.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16223
Authority: (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2); (25
U.S.C. 3006).
Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–06444 Filed 3–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–683 (Fourth
Review)]
Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of
a Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on fresh garlic from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission.
DATES: Effective April 3, 2017. To be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is May 3, 2017. Comments
on the adequacy of responses may be
filed with the Commission by June 15,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On November 16, 1994,
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping
duty order on imports of fresh garlic
from China (59 FR 59209). Following
first five-year reviews by Commerce and
the Commission, effective March 13,
2001, Commerce issued a continuation
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
16224
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
of the antidumping duty order on
imports of fresh garlic from China (66
FR 14544). Following second five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective October 19, 2006,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
fresh garlic from China (71 FR 61708).
Following the third five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission,
effective April 30, 2012, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
fresh garlic from China (77 FR 28355,
May 14, 2012). The Commission is now
conducting a fourth review pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine
whether revocation of the order would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Provisions concerning
the conduct of this proceeding may be
found in the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts
201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part
207, subparts A and F. The Commission
will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited
review. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited review
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination, the Commission found
three separate Domestic Like Products
consisting of fresh garlic, dehydrated
garlic, and seed garlic corresponding
with the broader scope of the original
investigation. However, the Commission
found that the domestic industries
producing garlic for dehydration and
seed garlic were neither materially
injured nor threatened with material
injury by reason of the subject imports
from China. One Commissioner defined
the Domestic Like Product differently in
the original determination. Consistent
with its Domestic Like Product
definition in the original investigation,
the Commission found in its full first
five-year review determination and its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
expedited second and third five-year
review determinations a single Domestic
Like Product consisting of all fresh
garlic, coextensive with Commerce’s
scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination,
the Commission found three Domestic
Industries consisting of the domestic
producers of fresh garlic, the domestic
producers of dehydrated garlic, and the
domestic producers of seed garlic to
coincide with the three Domestic Like
Products. The Commission also found
that crop tenders were not members of
the Domestic Industry. One
Commissioner defined the Domestic
Industry differently in the original
determination. In its full first five-year
review determination, consistent with
Commerce’s narrower scope and the
Commission’s Domestic Like Product
definition of a single Domestic Like
Product consisting of all fresh garlic, the
Commission found a single Domestic
Industry consisting of all producers of
fresh garlic. In its expedited second and
third five-year review determinations,
the Commission again found a single
Domestic Industry consisting of all
domestic producers of fresh garlic.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the proceeding and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the proceeding as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an
earlier review of the same underlying
investigation. The Commission’s
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
designated agency ethics official has
advised that a five-year review is not the
same particular matter as the underlying
original investigation, and a five-year
review is not the same particular matter
as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of
18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and
Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR
201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014),
73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008).
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation or an earlier review of the
same underlying investigation was
pending when they were Commission
employees. For further ethics advice on
this matter, contact Carol McCue
Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official,
at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in this proceeding available
to authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the proceeding, provided that
the application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the proceeding. A
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with this
proceeding must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will acknowledge that information
submitted in response to this request for
information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceeding may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All contract personnel will
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is May 3, 2017. Pursuant
to section 207.62(b) of the Commission’s
rules, eligible parties (as specified in
Commission rule 207.62(b)(1)) may also
file comments concerning the adequacy
of responses to the notice of institution
and whether the Commission should
conduct an expedited or full review.
The deadline for filing such comments
is June 15, 2017. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/documents/handbook_on_
filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon
the Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing. Also, in accordance
with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules, each document
filed by a party to the proceeding must
be served on all other parties to the
proceeding (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the proceeding you do
not need to serve your response).
No response to this request for
information is required if a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No.
17–5–381, expiration date June 30,
2017. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours
per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden
estimate to the Office of Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677e(b)) in making its determination in
the review.
Information to be Provided in
Response to this Notice of Institution:
As used below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes
any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and Email address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is an interested party
under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how,
including whether your firm/entity is a
U.S. producer of the Domestic Like
Product, a U.S. union or worker group,
a U.S. importer of the Subject
Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a
U.S. or foreign trade or business
association (a majority of whose
members are interested parties under
the statute), or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in this proceeding by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2011.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16225
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
number, fax number, and Email address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during crop
year 2016 (June 2015–May 2016), except
as noted (report quantity data in pounds
and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b.
plant). If you are a union/worker group
or trade/business association, provide
the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms in which your workers are
employed/which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (that
is, the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during crop
year 2016 (June 2015–May 2016) (report
quantity data in pounds and value data
in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
16226
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 62 / Monday, April 3, 2017 / Notices
the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports
and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’)
imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject
Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during crop year 2016 (June
2015–May 2016) (report quantity data in
pounds and value data in U.S. dollars,
landed and duty-paid at the U.S. port
but not including antidumping duties).
If you are a trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members
of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s)
to produce the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country (that is, the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country after 2011, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Mar 31, 2017
Jkt 241001
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being
conducted under authority of title VII of
the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
published pursuant to section 207.61 of
the Commission’s rules.
Issued: March 28, 2017.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–06427 Filed 3–31–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1186–1187
(Review)]
Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening
Agents From China and Taiwan;
Institution of Five-Year Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty orders on certain stilbenic optical
brightening agents from China and
Taiwan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Effective April 3, 2017. To be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is May 3, 2017. Comments
on the adequacy of responses may be
filed with the Commission by June 15,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 10, 2012, the
Department of Commerce issued
antidumping duty orders on imports of
certain stilbenic optical brightening
agents from China and Taiwan (77 FR
27419 and 27423). The Commission is
conducting reviews pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)), to determine whether
revocation of the orders would be likely
to lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
Provisions concerning the conduct of
this proceeding may be found in the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, Subparts
A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts
A and F. The Commission will assess
the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct full
reviews or expedited reviews. The
Commission’s determinations in any
expedited reviews will be based on the
facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to these reviews:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year reviews, as
defined by the Department of
Commerce.
(2) The Subject Countries in these
reviews are China and Taiwan.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 62 (Monday, April 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16223-16226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06427]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-683 (Fourth Review)]
Fresh Garlic From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act''), as amended, to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on fresh
garlic from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are
requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission.
DATES: Effective April 3, 2017. To be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is May 3, 2017. Comments on the adequacy of
responses may be filed with the Commission by June 15, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On November 16, 1994, the Department of Commerce
(``Commerce'') issued an antidumping duty order on imports of fresh
garlic from China (59 FR 59209). Following first five-year reviews by
Commerce and the Commission, effective March 13, 2001, Commerce issued
a continuation
[[Page 16224]]
of the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh garlic from China (66
FR 14544). Following second five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective October 19, 2006, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh garlic from China (71
FR 61708). Following the third five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective April 30, 2012, Commerce issued a continuation of
the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh garlic from China (77 FR
28355, May 14, 2012). The Commission is now conducting a fourth review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct
of this proceeding may be found in the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part
207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of
interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The
Commission's determination in any expedited review will be based on the
facts available, which may include information provided in response to
this notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination, the Commission found three separate Domestic Like
Products consisting of fresh garlic, dehydrated garlic, and seed garlic
corresponding with the broader scope of the original investigation.
However, the Commission found that the domestic industries producing
garlic for dehydration and seed garlic were neither materially injured
nor threatened with material injury by reason of the subject imports
from China. One Commissioner defined the Domestic Like Product
differently in the original determination. Consistent with its Domestic
Like Product definition in the original investigation, the Commission
found in its full first five-year review determination and its
expedited second and third five-year review determinations a single
Domestic Like Product consisting of all fresh garlic, coextensive with
Commerce's scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In its original determination, the
Commission found three Domestic Industries consisting of the domestic
producers of fresh garlic, the domestic producers of dehydrated garlic,
and the domestic producers of seed garlic to coincide with the three
Domestic Like Products. The Commission also found that crop tenders
were not members of the Domestic Industry. One Commissioner defined the
Domestic Industry differently in the original determination. In its
full first five-year review determination, consistent with Commerce's
narrower scope and the Commission's Domestic Like Product definition of
a single Domestic Like Product consisting of all fresh garlic, the
Commission found a single Domestic Industry consisting of all producers
of fresh garlic. In its expedited second and third five-year review
determinations, the Commission again found a single Domestic Industry
consisting of all domestic producers of fresh garlic.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the proceeding and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation. The Commission's designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular
matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review
is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b)
(19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5,
2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek
Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR
201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or
an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when
they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this
matter, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at
202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the proceeding. A separate service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that
information submitted in response to this request for information and
throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All contract personnel will
[[Page 16225]]
sign appropriate nondisclosure agreements.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is May 3, 2017. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing
such comments is June 15, 2017. All written submissions must conform
with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The
Commission's Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission's Web
site at https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates upon the Commission's
rules with respect to electronic filing. Also, in accordance with
sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules, each document
filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all other parties
to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or APO service
list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must accompany the
document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do not need to
serve your response).
No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 17-5-381, expiration
date June 30, 2017. Public reporting burden for the request is
estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436.
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in
making its determination in the review.
Information to be Provided in Response to this Notice of
Institution: As used below, the term ``firm'' includes any related
firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an
interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including
whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like
Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject
Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose
members are interested parties under the statute), or another
interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your
workers are employed or which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by
the Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a))
including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on
the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2011.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during crop year 2016 (June 2015-May 2016), except as noted
(report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b.
plant). If you are a union/worker group or trade/business association,
provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which
your workers are employed/which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (that is, the level of production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to attain during the year, assuming
normal operating conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and
ready to operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per
year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country,
provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that
product during crop year 2016 (June 2015-May 2016) (report quantity
data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/
business association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis,
for
[[Page 16226]]
the firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the
Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported
from the Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during crop year 2016 (June 2015-May 2016)
(report quantity data in pounds and value data in U.S. dollars, landed
and duty-paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties).
If you are a trade/business association, provide the information, on an
aggregate basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country (that is, the level of production
that your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain
during the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels
(hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance,
repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2011, and significant changes,
if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time.
Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase production (including the
shift of production facilities used for other products and the use,
cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors
related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets
(including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in
market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses
and applications; the existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the
Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries.
(13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant
to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
Issued: March 28, 2017.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-06427 Filed 3-31-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P