Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 11.190(g) To Modify the Quote Instability Coefficients and Quote Instability Threshold Included in the Quote Instability Calculation Specified in Subparagraph (g)(1) for Purposes of Determining Whether a Crumbling Quote Exists, 14058-14061 [2017-05210]

Download as PDF 14058 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Notices 2017–15 and should be submitted on or before April 6,2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.21 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–05214 Filed 3–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–80202; File No. SR–IEX– 2017–06] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 11.190(g) To Modify the Quote Instability Coefficients and Quote Instability Threshold Included in the Quote Instability Calculation Specified in Subparagraph (g)(1) for Purposes of Determining Whether a Crumbling Quote Exists notice required by Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.6 The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statement may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change March 10, 2017. 1. Purpose Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on Februrary 28, 2017, the Investors Exchange LLC filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. Overview The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 11.190(g) to modify the quote instability coefficients and quote instability threshold included in the quote instability calculation specified in subparagraph (g)(1) for purposes of determining whether a crumbling quote exists. When the Exchange determines that the quote in a particular security is crumbling from the national best bid, as comprised of Protected Quotations (‘‘Protected NBB’’), Discretionary Peg buy orders are restricted from exercising price discretion to trade against interest above the NBB. Similarly, when the Exchange determines that the quote in a particular security is crumbling from the national best offer, as comprised of Protected Quotations (‘‘Protected NBO’’ and collectively with the Protected NBB the ‘‘Protected NBBO’’), Discretionary Peg sell orders are restricted from exercising price discretion to trade against interest below the NBO. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),4 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,5 Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the Commission a proposed rule change to amend Rule 11.190(g) to incrementally optimize and enhance the effectiveness of the quote instability calculation in determining whether a crumbling quote exists. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non-controversial and provided the Commission with the 21 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Mar 15, 2017 Discretionary Peg Order The manner in which Discretionary Peg orders operate is described in Rule 11.190(b)(10). Specifically, a Discretionary Peg order is a nondisplayed, pegged order that upon entry into the System, the price of the order is automatically adjusted by the System to be equal to the less aggressive of the 6 17 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Midpoint Price or the order’s limit price, if any. When unexecuted shares of such order are posted to the Order Book, the price of the order is automatically adjusted by the System to be equal to and ranked at the less aggressive of the primary quote or the order’s limit price and is automatically adjusted by the System in response to changes in the NBB (NBO) for buy (sell) orders up (down) to the order’s limit price, if any. In order to meet the limit price of active orders on the Order Book, a Discretionary Peg order will exercise the least amount of price discretion necessary from the Discretionary Peg order’s resting price to its discretionary price (defined as the less aggressive of the Midpoint Price or the Discretionary Peg order’s limit price, if any), except during periods of quote instability (i.e., when a crumbling quote exists) as defined in paragraph Rule 11.190(g). In determining whether a crumbling quote exists, the Exchange utilizes real time relative quoting activity of Protected Quotations (not including quotations of the Exchange) and a proprietary mathematical calculation (the ‘‘quote instability calculation’’) to assess the probability of an imminent change to the current Protected NBB to a lower price or Protected NBO to a higher price for a particular security (‘‘quote instability factor’’). When the quoting activity meets predefined criteria and the quote instability factor calculated is greater than the Exchange’s defined threshold (‘‘quote instability threshold’’), the System treats the quote as not stable (‘‘quote instability’’ or a ‘‘crumbling quote’’). During all other times, the quote is considered stable (‘‘quote stability’’). The System independently assesses the stability of the Protected NBB and Protected NBO for each security. When the System determines that a quote, either the Protected NBB or the Protected NBO, is unstable, the determination remains in effect at that price level for two (2) milliseconds. The System will only treat one side of the Protected NBBO as unstable in a particular security at any given time.7 By not permitting resting Discretionary Peg orders to execute at a price that is more aggressive than the near-side protected NBB or NBO (as applicable) during periods of quote instability, the Exchange System is intended to attempt to protect such orders from unfavorable executions when the market is moving against them. Once the market has moved and the Exchange System deems the near-side Protected NBB or NBO (as applicable) to be stable (pursuant to a 7 See, E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM Rule 11.190(g). 16MRN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Notices pre-determined, objective set of conditions as described below), Discretionary Peg orders are permitted to exercise discretion up to (for buy orders) or down to (for sell orders) the midpoint of the NBBO in order to meet the limit price of active orders on the order book and thereby potentially provide price improvement to such active orders. Quote stability or instability (also referred to as a crumbling quote) is an assessment that the Exchange System makes on a real-time basis, based on a pre-determined, objective set of conditions specified in Rule 11.190(g)(1). Specifically, quote instability, or the presence of a crumbling quote, is determined by the System when the following factors occur: (A) The Protected NBB and Protected NBO are the same as the Protected NBB and Protected NBO one (1) millisecond ago; and (B) the Protected NBBO spread is less than or equal to the thirty (30) day median Protected NBBO spread during the Regular Market Session; and (C) there are more Protected Quotations on the far side, i.e. more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO than the Protected NBB for buy orders, or more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBB than the Protected NBO for sell orders; and (D) the quote instability factor result from the quote stability calculation is greater than the defined quote instability threshold. (i) Quote Instability Factor. The Exchange’s proprietary quote stability calculation used to determine the current quote instability factor is defined by the following formula that utilizes the quote stability coefficients and quote stability variables defined below: 1/(1 + e ∧¥(C0 + C1 * N + C2 * F + C3 * N¥1 + C4 * F¥1 + C5 * E + C6 * D)) (a) Quote Stability Coefficients. The Exchange utilizes the values below for the quote stability coefficients. (1) C0 = ¥1.3493 (2) C1 = ¥1.1409 (3) C2 = 0.2671 (4) C3 = 0.5141 (5) C4 = ¥0.1970 (6) C5 = 0.1347 (7) C6 = 0.6862 (b) Quote Stability Variables. The Exchange utilizes the quote stability variables defined below to calculate the current quote instability factor. (1) N = the number of Protected Quotations on the near side of the market, i.e. Protected NBB for buy VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Mar 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 orders and Protected NBO for sell orders. (2) F = the number of Protected Quotations on the far side of the market, i.e. Protected NBO for buy orders and Protected NBB for sell orders. (3) N¥1 = the number of Protected Quotations on the near side of the market one (1) millisecond ago. (4) F¥1 = the number of Protected Quotations on the far side of the market one (1) millisecond ago. (5) E = a Boolean indicator that equals 1 if the last two quotation updates have been quotations of protected markets moving away from the near side of the market on the same side of the market and at the same price. (6) D = the number of these three (3) venues that moved away from the near side of the market on the same side of the market and at the same price in the prior one (1) millisecond: XNGS, EDGX, BATS. (ii) Quote Instability Threshold. The Exchange utilizes a quote instability threshold of 0.6. Rule 11.190(g)(1)(D)(iii) provides that the Exchange reserves the right to modify the quote instability coefficients or quote instability threshold at any time, subject to a filing of a proposed rule change with the SEC. The Exchange is proposing such changes in this rule filing. Changes to Quote Instability Coefficients and Quote Instability Threshold IEX conducted an analysis of the effectiveness of the existing factors in predicting whether a crumbling quote would occur, by reviewing randomly selected market data from November 2016 through mid-February 2017. The results of the analysis were verified by reviewing randomly selected market data from January and mid-February 2017. Based on this analysis, the Exchange has determined that further optimization of the existing factors would incrementally increase the accuracy of the formula in predicting whether a crumbling quote will occur. The following describes the proposed changes: 1. Rule 11.190(g) states that the Exchange utilizes real time relative quoting activity of Protected Quotations, not including IEX protected quotations, in the quote instability calculation. As proposed, the Exchange is proposing to include the protection quotations of the following exchanges in the quote instability calculation: New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq BX, Bats BZX Exchange, Bats BYX Exchange, Bats EDGX Exchange, and Bats EDGA Exchange. In connection with our PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14059 analysis of market data, as described above, the Exchange considered several different permutations of which exchanges to include in the model. The research identified that using the Protected Quotations of these specific eight exchanges in the aggregate resulted in the greatest predictive power of all permutations of exchanges assessed for determining a crumbling quote. 2. The Exchange proposes to simplify the crumbling quote calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g)(1) by eliminating the three (3) preconditions related to the stability and ratio of the protected national best bid and offer (‘‘NBBO’’),8 and base the determination solely on whether the quote instability factor result from the quote stability calculation is greater than the defined quote instability threshold. Based on our analysis of market data, as described above, the Exchange believes that the simplification would incrementally increase the accuracy of the formula in predicting a crumbling quote by expanding the scope of the model to additional situations where a crumbling quote exists in the absence of the preconditions. 3. The Exchange proposes to revise the quote stability variables currently specified in subparagraph (1)(D)(i)(b) of Rule 11.190(g) by adding seven (7) new variables (NC, FC, Delta, EPos, ENeg, EPosPrev, and ENegPrev) and retiring four (4) variables (N–1, F–1, E, and D).9 Specifically, based on our analysis of market data, as described above, the Exchange identified that considering the maximum change over the course of the previous millisecond up to the most recent Protected NBBO change was a more accurate indicator of a crumbling quote than simply looking at the absolute state of the market one millisecond previously. The replacement of N–1, F–1, and D with NC, FC, and Delta, respectively, reflects this finding. Additionally, we found that looking at the previous two quote changes on a more granular basis (specifically, looking at whether each of the last two events individually was a 8 Currently IEX Rule 11.190(g)(1) provides that in determining whether a crumbling quote exists the following other factors will be considered: The Protected NBB and Protected NBO are the same as the Protected NBB and Protected NBO one (1) millisecond ago, the Protected NBBO spread is less than or equal to the thirty (30) day median Protected NBBO spread during the Regular Market Session, and there are more Protected Quotations on the far side, i.e., more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO than the Protected NBB for buy orders or more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO for sell orders. 9 Two (2) of the existing variables (N and F) will be retained. E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 14060 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Notices quote dropping off the near side or joining the near side, rather than whether both of the last two events dropped off the near side) was a more accurate indicator of a crumbling quote than a simple boolean factor indicating whether both of the last two events were quotes dropping off the inside. Replacing E with 4 separate factors— EPos, ENeg, EPosPrev, and ENegPrev— reflects this finding. 4. The Quote Stability Coefficients specified in subparagraph (1)(D)(i) of Rule 11.190(g) are proposed to be modified to take into account the recent market data analysis, as well as the changes to the quote stability variables as described above. Specifically, as proposed the seven (7) existing coefficients will be modified and three (3) new coefficients will be added. The Exchange believes that the modifications, as proposed, will increase the accuracy of the quote instability calculation. 5. The Exchange proposes to modify and re-optimize the Quote Instability Threshold specified in subparagraph (1)(D)(ii) of Rule 11.190(g) based on the recent market data analysis and the new quote stability variables. Specifically, the threshold size would vary based on the spread of the Protected NBBO.10 Based on its data analysis, as described above, the Exchange concluded that tiering the threshold would reduce the rate of false positives. Consequently, the Exchange believes that the modifications, as proposed, will increase the accuracy of the quote instability calculation. 6. Finally, the Exchange proposes conforming numbering changes to Rule 11.190(g) to reflect elimination of the three (3) preconditions for the crumbling quote calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g)(1) as described above. The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the proposed rule change by Trader Notice at least five business days in advance of such implementation date and within 90 days of effectiveness of this proposed rule change. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) 11 of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,12 in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 10 The spread is defined in proposed paragraph (1)(D)(ii) as the Protected Best Offer minus Protected Best Bid. 11 15 U.S.C. 78f. 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Mar 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, and as discussed above, the proposal is designed to optimize and enhance the effectiveness of the quote instability calculation in determining whether a crumbling quote exists. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes are designed to protect investors and the public interest by enhancing the accuracy of the Exchange’s quote instability calculation in determining whether a crumbling quote exists thereby preventing Discretionary Peg orders from trading at prices more aggressive than the near side of the market (NBB for buy orders, NBO for sell orders) to protect such orders from unfavorable executions when the market appears to be moving against them. As discussed in the Purpose section, each of the proposed changes are based on the Exchange’s analysis of market data, which supports that, in the aggregate and individually, the proposed changes would increase the accuracy of the Exchange’s quote instability calculation. As proposed, the new quote instability calculation will continue to be a fixed formula specified transparently in IEX’s rules. The Exchange is not proposing to add any new functionality, but merely to revise the fixed formula based on market data analysis designed to increase the accuracy of the formula in predicting a crumbling quote, and as contemplated by the rule. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change will apply equally to all IEX Members. The Commission has already considered the Exchange’s Discretionary Peg order type in connection with its grant of IEX’s application for registration as a national securities exchange under Sections 6 and 19 of the Act.13 The proposed rule change is designed to merely enhance the accuracy of the quote instability calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g); 13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 78101 (June 17, 2016), 81 FR 41142 (June 23, 2016) (File No. 10–222). PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 therefore, no new burdens are being proposed. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 14 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.15 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 16 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),17 the Commission may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The Exchange stated that the proposed rule change is designed to optimize the fixed quote instability equation contained in the rule without introducing new functionality or materially changing the operation of the current functionality in a manner not contemplated by the rule. The Exchange believes that its proposal will operate to protect Members that enter Discretionary Peg orders from unfavorable executions when the market is moving against such orders, and noted that waiver of the operative delay would allow the Exchange to implement the optimized formula without delay. As the Exchange’s proposal is intended to further refine the ability of the discretionary peg order type to meet its stated objectives as reflected in the Exchange’s rule, the Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby 14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), IEX provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 15 17 E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 50 / Thursday, March 16, 2017 / Notices waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.18 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File SR–IEX– 2017–06 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–IEX–2017–06. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–IEX– 2017–06 and should be submitted on or before April 6, 2017. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.19 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change [FR Doc. 2017–05210 Filed 3–15–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–80215; File No. SR– BatsEDGA–2017–05] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change to Rule 11.21 To Modify the Date of Appendix B Web Site Data Publication Pursuant to the Regulation NMS Plan To Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program March 10, 2017. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 28, 2017, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,4 which renders it effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 19 17 18 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:12 Mar 15, 2017 Jkt 241001 14061 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rule 11.21 to modify the date of Appendix B Web site data publication pursuant to the Regulation NMS Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program (‘‘Plan’’). The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site at www.bats.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose Rule 11.21(b) (Compliance with Data Collection Requirements) 5 implements the data collection and Web site publication requirements of the Plan.6 Rule 11.21(b).08 provides, among other things, that the requirement that the Exchange or Designated Examining Authority (‘‘DEA’’) make certain data publicly available on their Web site pursuant to Appendix B and C to the Plan shall commence at the beginning of the Pilot Period,7 and that the Exchange or DEA shall make data for the Pre-Pilot Period publicly available on their Web 5 See Exchange Rule 11.21(b). See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 77417 (March 22, 2016), 81 FR 17219 (March 28, 2016); and 78799 (September 9, 2016), 81 FR 63549 (September 15, 2016). 6 The Participants filed the Plan to comply with an order issued by the Commission on June 24, 2014. See Letter from Brendon J. Weiss, Vice President, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., to Secretary, Commission, dated August 25, 2014 (‘‘SRO Tick Size Plan Proposal’’). See Securities Exchange Act Release No 72460 (June 24, 2014), 79 FR 36840 (June 30, 2014); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892 (May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015). 7 Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meaning ascribed to them in Rule 11.21. E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 50 (Thursday, March 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14058-14061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80202; File No. SR-IEX-2017-06]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend 
Rule 11.190(g) To Modify the Quote Instability Coefficients and Quote 
Instability Threshold Included in the Quote Instability Calculation 
Specified in Subparagraph (g)(1) for Purposes of Determining Whether a 
Crumbling Quote Exists

March 10, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given that, on 
Februrary 28, 2017, the Investors Exchange LLC filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule 
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been 
prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\4\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ 
Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or ``Exchange'') is filing with the 
Commission a proposed rule change to amend Rule 11.190(g) to 
incrementally optimize and enhance the effectiveness of the quote 
instability calculation in determining whether a crumbling quote 
exists. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non-controversial 
and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statement may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Overview
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 11.190(g) 
to modify the quote instability coefficients and quote instability 
threshold included in the quote instability calculation specified in 
subparagraph (g)(1) for purposes of determining whether a crumbling 
quote exists. When the Exchange determines that the quote in a 
particular security is crumbling from the national best bid, as 
comprised of Protected Quotations (``Protected NBB''), Discretionary 
Peg buy orders are restricted from exercising price discretion to trade 
against interest above the NBB. Similarly, when the Exchange determines 
that the quote in a particular security is crumbling from the national 
best offer, as comprised of Protected Quotations (``Protected NBO'' and 
collectively with the Protected NBB the ``Protected NBBO''), 
Discretionary Peg sell orders are restricted from exercising price 
discretion to trade against interest below the NBO.
Discretionary Peg Order
    The manner in which Discretionary Peg orders operate is described 
in Rule 11.190(b)(10). Specifically, a Discretionary Peg order is a 
non-displayed, pegged order that upon entry into the System, the price 
of the order is automatically adjusted by the System to be equal to the 
less aggressive of the Midpoint Price or the order's limit price, if 
any. When unexecuted shares of such order are posted to the Order Book, 
the price of the order is automatically adjusted by the System to be 
equal to and ranked at the less aggressive of the primary quote or the 
order's limit price and is automatically adjusted by the System in 
response to changes in the NBB (NBO) for buy (sell) orders up (down) to 
the order's limit price, if any. In order to meet the limit price of 
active orders on the Order Book, a Discretionary Peg order will 
exercise the least amount of price discretion necessary from the 
Discretionary Peg order's resting price to its discretionary price 
(defined as the less aggressive of the Midpoint Price or the 
Discretionary Peg order's limit price, if any), except during periods 
of quote instability (i.e., when a crumbling quote exists) as defined 
in paragraph Rule 11.190(g).
    In determining whether a crumbling quote exists, the Exchange 
utilizes real time relative quoting activity of Protected Quotations 
(not including quotations of the Exchange) and a proprietary 
mathematical calculation (the ``quote instability calculation'') to 
assess the probability of an imminent change to the current Protected 
NBB to a lower price or Protected NBO to a higher price for a 
particular security (``quote instability factor''). When the quoting 
activity meets predefined criteria and the quote instability factor 
calculated is greater than the Exchange's defined threshold (``quote 
instability threshold''), the System treats the quote as not stable 
(``quote instability'' or a ``crumbling quote''). During all other 
times, the quote is considered stable (``quote stability''). The System 
independently assesses the stability of the Protected NBB and Protected 
NBO for each security.
    When the System determines that a quote, either the Protected NBB 
or the Protected NBO, is unstable, the determination remains in effect 
at that price level for two (2) milliseconds. The System will only 
treat one side of the Protected NBBO as unstable in a particular 
security at any given time.\7\ By not permitting resting Discretionary 
Peg orders to execute at a price that is more aggressive than the near-
side protected NBB or NBO (as applicable) during periods of quote 
instability, the Exchange System is intended to attempt to protect such 
orders from unfavorable executions when the market is moving against 
them. Once the market has moved and the Exchange System deems the near-
side Protected NBB or NBO (as applicable) to be stable (pursuant to a

[[Page 14059]]

pre-determined, objective set of conditions as described below), 
Discretionary Peg orders are permitted to exercise discretion up to 
(for buy orders) or down to (for sell orders) the midpoint of the NBBO 
in order to meet the limit price of active orders on the order book and 
thereby potentially provide price improvement to such active orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See, Rule 11.190(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Quote stability or instability (also referred to as a crumbling 
quote) is an assessment that the Exchange System makes on a real-time 
basis, based on a pre-determined, objective set of conditions specified 
in Rule 11.190(g)(1). Specifically, quote instability, or the presence 
of a crumbling quote, is determined by the System when the following 
factors occur:
    (A) The Protected NBB and Protected NBO are the same as the 
Protected NBB and Protected NBO one (1) millisecond ago; and
    (B) the Protected NBBO spread is less than or equal to the thirty 
(30) day median Protected NBBO spread during the Regular Market 
Session; and
    (C) there are more Protected Quotations on the far side, i.e. more 
Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO than the Protected NBB for 
buy orders, or more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBB than the 
Protected NBO for sell orders; and
    (D) the quote instability factor result from the quote stability 
calculation is greater than the defined quote instability threshold.
    (i) Quote Instability Factor. The Exchange's proprietary quote 
stability calculation used to determine the current quote instability 
factor is defined by the following formula that utilizes the quote 
stability coefficients and quote stability variables defined below:

1/(1 + e [supcaret]-(C0 + C1 * N + C2 
* F + C3 * N-1 + C4 * F-1 + 
C5 * E + C6 * D))

    (a) Quote Stability Coefficients. The Exchange utilizes the values 
below for the quote stability coefficients.

(1) C0 = -1.3493
(2) C1 = -1.1409
(3) C2 = 0.2671
(4) C3 = 0.5141
(5) C4 = -0.1970
(6) C5 = 0.1347
(7) C6 = 0.6862

    (b) Quote Stability Variables. The Exchange utilizes the quote 
stability variables defined below to calculate the current quote 
instability factor.
    (1) N = the number of Protected Quotations on the near side of the 
market, i.e. Protected NBB for buy orders and Protected NBO for sell 
orders.
    (2) F = the number of Protected Quotations on the far side of the 
market, i.e. Protected NBO for buy orders and Protected NBB for sell 
orders.
    (3) N-1 = the number of Protected Quotations on the near 
side of the market one (1) millisecond ago.
    (4) F-1 = the number of Protected Quotations on the far 
side of the market one (1) millisecond ago.
    (5) E = a Boolean indicator that equals 1 if the last two quotation 
updates have been quotations of protected markets moving away from the 
near side of the market on the same side of the market and at the same 
price.
    (6) D = the number of these three (3) venues that moved away from 
the near side of the market on the same side of the market and at the 
same price in the prior one (1) millisecond: XNGS, EDGX, BATS.
    (ii) Quote Instability Threshold. The Exchange utilizes a quote 
instability threshold of 0.6.
    Rule 11.190(g)(1)(D)(iii) provides that the Exchange reserves the 
right to modify the quote instability coefficients or quote instability 
threshold at any time, subject to a filing of a proposed rule change 
with the SEC. The Exchange is proposing such changes in this rule 
filing.
Changes to Quote Instability Coefficients and Quote Instability 
Threshold
    IEX conducted an analysis of the effectiveness of the existing 
factors in predicting whether a crumbling quote would occur, by 
reviewing randomly selected market data from November 2016 through mid-
February 2017. The results of the analysis were verified by reviewing 
randomly selected market data from January and mid-February 2017. Based 
on this analysis, the Exchange has determined that further optimization 
of the existing factors would incrementally increase the accuracy of 
the formula in predicting whether a crumbling quote will occur. The 
following describes the proposed changes:
    1. Rule 11.190(g) states that the Exchange utilizes real time 
relative quoting activity of Protected Quotations, not including IEX 
protected quotations, in the quote instability calculation. As 
proposed, the Exchange is proposing to include the protection 
quotations of the following exchanges in the quote instability 
calculation: New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq BX, Bats BZX 
Exchange, Bats BYX Exchange, Bats EDGX Exchange, and Bats EDGA 
Exchange. In connection with our analysis of market data, as described 
above, the Exchange considered several different permutations of which 
exchanges to include in the model. The research identified that using 
the Protected Quotations of these specific eight exchanges in the 
aggregate resulted in the greatest predictive power of all permutations 
of exchanges assessed for determining a crumbling quote.
    2. The Exchange proposes to simplify the crumbling quote 
calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g)(1) by eliminating the three (3) 
preconditions related to the stability and ratio of the protected 
national best bid and offer (``NBBO''),\8\ and base the determination 
solely on whether the quote instability factor result from the quote 
stability calculation is greater than the defined quote instability 
threshold. Based on our analysis of market data, as described above, 
the Exchange believes that the simplification would incrementally 
increase the accuracy of the formula in predicting a crumbling quote by 
expanding the scope of the model to additional situations where a 
crumbling quote exists in the absence of the pre-conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Currently IEX Rule 11.190(g)(1) provides that in determining 
whether a crumbling quote exists the following other factors will be 
considered: The Protected NBB and Protected NBO are the same as the 
Protected NBB and Protected NBO one (1) millisecond ago, the 
Protected NBBO spread is less than or equal to the thirty (30) day 
median Protected NBBO spread during the Regular Market Session, and 
there are more Protected Quotations on the far side, i.e., more 
Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO than the Protected NBB for 
buy orders or more Protected Quotations on the Protected NBO for 
sell orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. The Exchange proposes to revise the quote stability variables 
currently specified in subparagraph (1)(D)(i)(b) of Rule 11.190(g) by 
adding seven (7) new variables (NC, FC, Delta, EPos, ENeg, EPosPrev, 
and ENegPrev) and retiring four (4) variables (N-1, F-1, E, and D).\9\ 
Specifically, based on our analysis of market data, as described above, 
the Exchange identified that considering the maximum change over the 
course of the previous millisecond up to the most recent Protected NBBO 
change was a more accurate indicator of a crumbling quote than simply 
looking at the absolute state of the market one millisecond previously. 
The replacement of N-1, F-1, and D with NC, FC, and Delta, 
respectively, reflects this finding. Additionally, we found that 
looking at the previous two quote changes on a more granular basis 
(specifically, looking at whether each of the last two events 
individually was a

[[Page 14060]]

quote dropping off the near side or joining the near side, rather than 
whether both of the last two events dropped off the near side) was a 
more accurate indicator of a crumbling quote than a simple boolean 
factor indicating whether both of the last two events were quotes 
dropping off the inside. Replacing E with 4 separate factors--EPos, 
ENeg, EPosPrev, and ENegPrev--reflects this finding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Two (2) of the existing variables (N and F) will be 
retained.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. The Quote Stability Coefficients specified in subparagraph 
(1)(D)(i) of Rule 11.190(g) are proposed to be modified to take into 
account the recent market data analysis, as well as the changes to the 
quote stability variables as described above. Specifically, as proposed 
the seven (7) existing coefficients will be modified and three (3) new 
coefficients will be added. The Exchange believes that the 
modifications, as proposed, will increase the accuracy of the quote 
instability calculation.
    5. The Exchange proposes to modify and re-optimize the Quote 
Instability Threshold specified in subparagraph (1)(D)(ii) of Rule 
11.190(g) based on the recent market data analysis and the new quote 
stability variables. Specifically, the threshold size would vary based 
on the spread of the Protected NBBO.\10\ Based on its data analysis, as 
described above, the Exchange concluded that tiering the threshold 
would reduce the rate of false positives. Consequently, the Exchange 
believes that the modifications, as proposed, will increase the 
accuracy of the quote instability calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The spread is defined in proposed paragraph (1)(D)(ii) as 
the Protected Best Offer minus Protected Best Bid.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. Finally, the Exchange proposes conforming numbering changes to 
Rule 11.190(g) to reflect elimination of the three (3) preconditions 
for the crumbling quote calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g)(1) as 
described above.
    The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the proposed 
rule change by Trader Notice at least five business days in advance of 
such implementation date and within 90 days of effectiveness of this 
proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with 
Section 6(b) \11\ of the Act in general, and furthers the objectives of 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it is designed 
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote 
just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in 
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, and as 
discussed above, the proposal is designed to optimize and enhance the 
effectiveness of the quote instability calculation in determining 
whether a crumbling quote exists. The Exchange believes that the 
proposed changes are designed to protect investors and the public 
interest by enhancing the accuracy of the Exchange's quote instability 
calculation in determining whether a crumbling quote exists thereby 
preventing Discretionary Peg orders from trading at prices more 
aggressive than the near side of the market (NBB for buy orders, NBO 
for sell orders) to protect such orders from unfavorable executions 
when the market appears to be moving against them. As discussed in the 
Purpose section, each of the proposed changes are based on the 
Exchange's analysis of market data, which supports that, in the 
aggregate and individually, the proposed changes would increase the 
accuracy of the Exchange's quote instability calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, the new quote instability calculation will continue to 
be a fixed formula specified transparently in IEX's rules. The Exchange 
is not proposing to add any new functionality, but merely to revise the 
fixed formula based on market data analysis designed to increase the 
accuracy of the formula in predicting a crumbling quote, and as 
contemplated by the rule.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change will apply 
equally to all IEX Members. The Commission has already considered the 
Exchange's Discretionary Peg order type in connection with its grant of 
IEX's application for registration as a national securities exchange 
under Sections 6 and 19 of the Act.\13\ The proposed rule change is 
designed to merely enhance the accuracy of the quote instability 
calculation specified in Rule 11.190(g); therefore, no new burdens are 
being proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78101 (June 17, 
2016), 81 FR 41142 (June 23, 2016) (File No. 10-222).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), IEX provided the Commission with written notice of its 
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief 
description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five 
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule 
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\17\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The Exchange stated 
that the proposed rule change is designed to optimize the fixed quote 
instability equation contained in the rule without introducing new 
functionality or materially changing the operation of the current 
functionality in a manner not contemplated by the rule. The Exchange 
believes that its proposal will operate to protect Members that enter 
Discretionary Peg orders from unfavorable executions when the market is 
moving against such orders, and noted that waiver of the operative 
delay would allow the Exchange to implement the optimized formula 
without delay. As the Exchange's proposal is intended to further refine 
the ability of the discretionary peg order type to meet its stated 
objectives as reflected in the Exchange's rule, the Commission believes 
that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby

[[Page 14061]]

waives the operative delay and designates the proposed rule change 
operative upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \18\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File SR-IEX-2017-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2017-06. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2017-06 and should be 
submitted on or before April 6, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05210 Filed 3-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.