Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and Preliminary Intent To Rescind in Part: Calendar Year 2015, 13792-13794 [2017-05132]
Download as PDF
13792
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Notices
a. Why should this methodology be
used in place of the current options
outlined in 7 CFR 273.10(c)(2)(i)?
b. Does this methodology support the
legislative intent of Congress in
removing barriers to access to
households in need of nutritional
assistance?
c. Does this methodology support the
legislative intent of Congress to grant
States more flexibility?
Dated: March 6, 2017.
Jessica Shahin,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–05133 Filed 3–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Humboldt (NV) Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Humboldt (NV) Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Winnemucca, Nevada. The committee is
authorized under the Secure Rural
Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with the Act.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
March 29, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific
Standard Time (PST). All RAC meetings
are subject to cancellation. For status of
meeting prior to attendance, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the USDA Service Center, 3275
Fountain Way, Winnemucca, Nevada
89445. The meeting can also be attended
by teleconference. For anyone who
would like to attend by teleconference,
please visit https://fs.usda.gov/goto/htnf/
rac or contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at the USDA Service
Center. Please call ahead to facilitate
entry into the building.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Garrotto, Designated Federal
Officer, by phone at (775) 352–1215 or
via email at jgarrotto@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is to:
1. Elect Chair/Vice Chairperson, and
2. Review and recommend project
proposals for Title II funds.
The meeting is open to the public.
The agenda will include time for people
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should request in writing
by March 15, 2017, to be scheduled on
the agenda. Anyone who would like to
bring related matters to the attention of
the committee may file written
statements with the committee staff
before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time to make
oral comments must be sent to Wendy
Markham, RAC Coordinator; by email to
wmarkahm@fs.fed.us, or via facsimile to
775–623–9134.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices,
or other reasonable accommodation. For
access to the facility or proceedings,
please contact the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case by case basis.
Dated: February 24, 2017.
Glenn Casamassa,
Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National
Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2017–05101 Filed 3–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Notice of Correction to Federal
Register Notice for 2018 End-to-End
Census Test- Post-Enumeration
Survey Independent Listing Operation
U.S Census Bureau, Commerce.
Notice of correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On December 28, 2016,
Federal Register Document 2016–31410
was published, which provided the
Census Bureau’s plans for the 2018 Endto-End Census Test- Post-Enumeration
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Survey Independent Listing Operation.
This collection was subsequently
cancelled. This Correction Notice serves
as notification of the cancellation of this
collection after the Federal Register
Notice was published for public
comment.
Sheleen Dumas,
PRA Departmental Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–05142 Filed 3–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–580–837]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate From the Republic of
Korea: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, and Preliminary Intent To
Rescind in Part: Calendar Year 2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel
plate from the Republic of Korea (Korea)
for the period January 1, 2015, through
December 31, 2015. This review covers
multiple exporters/producers; two of
which are being individually examined
as mandatory respondents. The
Department preliminary determines that
Hyundai Steel Co. (Hyundai Steel)
received countervailable subsidies that
are above de minimis and that Dongkuk
Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM) received
countervailable subsidies that are de
minimis. Therefore, we are applying to
the five firms not selected for individual
examination in the administrative
review the above de minimis net
subsidy rate calculated for Hyundai
Steel. See the ‘‘Preliminary Results of
Review’’ section below.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective March 15, 2017.
John
Conniff (for Hyundai Steel) or Jolanta
Lawska (for DSM), AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–1009
and (202) 482–8362, respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Notices
Intent to Partially Rescind the
Administrative Review
The Department initiated a review of
15 companies in this segment of the
proceeding.1 Between April 15 and May
9, 2016, we received timely filed no
shipment certifications from GS Global
Corp. (GS Global), Hyundai Glovis,
Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd
(Hyundai Mipo), Hyuosung Corporation
(Hyuosung), Posco Daewoo Corporation
(formerly known as Daewoo
International Corp.) 2 (Posco Daewoo
Corp.), Samsung C&T Corporation
(Samsung C&T Corp.), SK Networks Co.,
Ltd. (SK Networks), and Samsung Heavy
Industries. Because there is no evidence
on the record to indicate that these
companies had sales of subject
merchandise during the period of
review (POR), pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), the Department intends to
rescind the review with respect to GS
Global, Hyundai Glovis, Hyundai Mipo,
Hyuosung, Posco Daewoo Corp.,
Samsung C&T Corp., SK Networks, and
Samsung Heavy Industries. A final
decision regarding whether to rescind
on these companies will be made in the
final results of this review.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain cut-to-length plate from Korea.
For a complete description of the scope
of this administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a
financial contribution by an ‘‘authority’’
that confers a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.4 For a
full description of the methodology
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
20324 (April 7, 2016).
2 On May 5, 2016 the Department received a
‘‘Notice of No Sales’’ letter from Posco Daewoo
Corporation, which was formerly known as
‘‘Daewoo International Corp.’’
3 See ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, and the Preliminary Intent to Rescind in
Part: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel
Plate from the Republic of Korea,’’ from James
Maeder, Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
4 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
underlying our conclusions, see the
accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Rate for Non-Selected Companies
Under Review
There are five companies for which a
review was requested and not
preliminarily rescinded, but were not
selected as mandatory respondents. We
are applying to the non-selected
companies the rate preliminarily
calculated for Hyundai Steel, which is
above de minimis.
Preliminary Results of the Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for DSM and
Hyundai Steel. For the period January 1,
2015, through December 31, 2015, we
preliminarily determine that the
following net subsidy rates for the
producers/exporters under review to be
as follows:
2015
Ad valorem
rate
(percent)
Company
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd ................
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd .......................
Bookuk Steel .......................................
BDP International ................................
Samsung C&T Engineering and Construction Group.
Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd ......................
Samsung C&T Trading and Investment Group.
0.13 (de
minimis)
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
parties to this proceeding the
calculations performed in reaching the
preliminary results within five days of
the date of publication of these
preliminary results.5 Interested parties
may submit written arguments (case
briefs) within 30 days of publication of
5 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13793
the preliminary results and rebuttal
comments (rebuttal briefs) within five
days after the time limit for filing the
case briefs.6 Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must be
limited to issues raised in the case
briefs. Parties who submit arguments are
requested to submit with the argument:
(1) Statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce, within 30
days after the date of publication of this
notice.7 Requests should contain the
party’s name, address, and telephone
number, the number of participants, and
a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, we will
inform parties of the scheduled date for
the hearing, which will be held at the
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and location to be
determined.8 Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing.
Parties are reminded that briefs and
hearing requests are to be filed
electronically using ACCESS and that
electronically filed documents must be
received successfully in their entirety by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act, the Department will issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of our analysis of
the issues raised by parties in their
comments, within 120 days after
issuance of these preliminary results.
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit
Requirements
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. We
intend to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
The Department also intends to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties in the
amounts indicated above for each
company listed on shipments of subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication of the final
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); 351.309(d)(1); and
19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
7 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
8 See 19 CFR 351.310.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
13794
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 49 / Wednesday, March 15, 2017 / Notices
results of this administrative review. For
all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct
CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated countervailing duties at the
most recent company-specific or allothers rate applicable to the company,
as appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213.
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Intent To Rescind the 2015
Administrative Review, in Part
IV. Non-Selected Rate
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
A. Allocation Period
B. Attribution of Subsidies
C. Benchmarks for Long-Term Loans and
Discount Rates
D. Denominators
VII. Analysis of Programs
A. Programs Preliminarily Determined To
Be Countervailable
B. Programs Preliminarily Determined Not
To Confer a Measurable Benefit
C. Programs Preliminarily Determined To
Not Be Countervailable
D. Other Programs
E. Additional Programs Preliminarily
Determined To Be Not Used During the
POR
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–05132 Filed 3–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Notice of Scope Rulings
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2017.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) hereby publishes a list
of scope rulings and anticircumvention
determinations made between January
1, 2016, and March 31, 2016, inclusive.
We intend to publish future lists after
the close of the next calendar quarter.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, AD/CVD Operations,
Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES2
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:19 Mar 14, 2017
Jkt 241001
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
202–482–4735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department’s regulations provide
that the Secretary will publish in the
Federal Register a list of scope rulings
on a quarterly basis.1 Our most recent
notification of scope rulings was
published on October 7, 2016.2 This
current notice covers all scope rulings
and anticircumvention determinations
made by Enforcement and Compliance
between January 1, 2016, and March 31,
2016, inclusive. Subsequent lists will
follow after the close of each calendar
quarter.
Scope Rulings Made Between January 1,
2016 and March 31, 2016
Mexico
A–201–805: Certain Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe From Mexico
Requestor: Regiomontana de Perfiles y
Tubos S.A. de C.V.; certain black, circular
tubing produced to ASTM A–513
specifications meet the exclusion criteria for
mechanical tubing and are, therefore, not
included within the scope of the order;
March 31, 2016.
People’s Republic of China
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Plexus Corporation; Silver
Spring Network Enclosure (SSN Enclosures)
and Silver Spring Network Enclosure Kits
(SSNE Kits); The SSN Enclosure are imported
separately or grouped with spare parts, and
because they are composed of only
aluminum extrusions, under the finished
merchandise provision, they are included
within the scope of the orders. However,
when the SSN Enclosures are imported with
both aluminum and non-extruded aluminum
components to fully fabricate into a product
that would serve as a subassembly ready for
use in conjunction with a downstream
product upon installation, these SSNE Kits
meet the finished goods kit criteria and are
excluded from the scope of the orders;
January 5, 2016.
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Ventana Design-Build Systems,
Inc.; Ventana Window Walls are customized
window-wall structures that at the time of
importation contain all of the parts necessary
to assemble into a finished window wall,
which meet the criteria of finished goods
kits, and are thus, excluded from the scope
of the orders; January 19, 2016.
1 See
19 CFR 351.225(o).
Notice of Scope Rulings, 81 FR 69784
(October 7, 2016).
2 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Homecrest Outdoor Living,
LLC; Homecrest Woven Polypropylene Seats
are woven seats that incorporate extruded
aluminum frames with wicker material
formed of polypropylene rope, which meet
the finished merchandise criteria, and thus
are excluded from the scope of the orders;
January 27, 2016.
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc.
(‘‘Pentair’’); Pentair’s telescopic aluminum
pool poles and detachable skimmers and
rakes are fully and permanently assembled
and completed at the time of entry and
contain non-extruded aluminum components
beyond mere fasteners, and, thus, are
excluded from the scope of the orders as
finished merchandise; March 11, 2016.
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Trending Imports LLC
(‘‘Trending’’); Trending’s aluminum
extrusions made from 5050 grade aluminum
alloy material were preliminary found to be
outside of the scope of the orders on
aluminum extrusions from the PRC because
the 5050 alloy products meet the explicit
exclusion in the scope of ‘‘aluminum alloy{s}
with an Aluminum Association series
designation commencing with the number 5
and containing in excess of 1.0 percent
magnesium by weight.’’; March 11, 2016.
A–570–967 and C–570–968: Aluminum
Extrusions From the People’s Republic of
China
Requestor: Kota International, LTD
(‘‘Kota’’); Kota’s ACS–50 series aluminum
extrusions made from 5xxx series grade
aluminum alloy material were preliminary
found to be outside of the scope of the orders
on aluminum extrusions from the PRC
because the 5xxx series alloy products meet
the explicit exclusion in the scope of
‘‘aluminum alloy{s} with an Aluminum
Association series designation commencing
with the number 5 and containing in excess
of 1.0 percent magnesium by weight.’’; March
11, 2016.
A–570–901: Certain Lined Paper Products
From the People’s Republic of China
Requestor: Nelson Torres Advertising
(‘‘NTA’’); NTA’s funeral album product is
within the scope of the order on certain lined
paper products from the PRC because the
product does not meet any of the specific
exclusion criteria for products intended for
specific record keeping uses, such as ‘‘desk
and wall calendars and organizers,’’
‘‘telephone logs,’’ or ‘‘address books; January
12, 2016.
A–570–943 and C–570–944: Certain Oil
Country Tubular Goods From the People’s
Republic of China
Requestor: DynaEnergetics U.S. Inc.;
certain tubing for perforating gun carriers
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13792-13794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05132]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-580-837]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, and Preliminary Intent To Rescind in Part:
Calendar Year 2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain
cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) for the period January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. This
review covers multiple exporters/producers; two of which are being
individually examined as mandatory respondents. The Department
preliminary determines that Hyundai Steel Co. (Hyundai Steel) received
countervailable subsidies that are above de minimis and that Dongkuk
Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM) received countervailable subsidies that are
de minimis. Therefore, we are applying to the five firms not selected
for individual examination in the administrative review the above de
minimis net subsidy rate calculated for Hyundai Steel. See the
``Preliminary Results of Review'' section below.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Conniff (for Hyundai Steel) or
Jolanta Lawska (for DSM), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482-1009 and (202) 482-8362, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 13793]]
Intent to Partially Rescind the Administrative Review
The Department initiated a review of 15 companies in this segment
of the proceeding.\1\ Between April 15 and May 9, 2016, we received
timely filed no shipment certifications from GS Global Corp. (GS
Global), Hyundai Glovis, Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd (Hyundai Mipo),
Hyuosung Corporation (Hyuosung), Posco Daewoo Corporation (formerly
known as Daewoo International Corp.) \2\ (Posco Daewoo Corp.), Samsung
C&T Corporation (Samsung C&T Corp.), SK Networks Co., Ltd. (SK
Networks), and Samsung Heavy Industries. Because there is no evidence
on the record to indicate that these companies had sales of subject
merchandise during the period of review (POR), pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3), the Department intends to rescind the review with
respect to GS Global, Hyundai Glovis, Hyundai Mipo, Hyuosung, Posco
Daewoo Corp., Samsung C&T Corp., SK Networks, and Samsung Heavy
Industries. A final decision regarding whether to rescind on these
companies will be made in the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 20324 (April 7, 2016).
\2\ On May 5, 2016 the Department received a ``Notice of No
Sales'' letter from Posco Daewoo Corporation, which was formerly
known as ``Daewoo International Corp.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is certain cut-to-length plate
from Korea. For a complete description of the scope of this
administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and the Preliminary
Intent to Rescind in Part: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate from the Republic of Korea,'' from James Maeder, Senior
Director, Office I, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we preliminarily
determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an
``authority'' that confers a benefit to the recipient, and that the
subsidy is specific.\4\ For a full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under Review
There are five companies for which a review was requested and not
preliminarily rescinded, but were not selected as mandatory
respondents. We are applying to the non-selected companies the rate
preliminarily calculated for Hyundai Steel, which is above de minimis.
Preliminary Results of the Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(i), we calculated an
individual subsidy rate for DSM and Hyundai Steel. For the period
January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015, we preliminarily determine
that the following net subsidy rates for the producers/exporters under
review to be as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 Ad valorem rate
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd................ 0.13 (de minimis)
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd..................... 0.54
Bookuk Steel............................... 0.54
BDP International.......................... 0.54
Samsung C&T Engineering and Construction 0.54
Group.
Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd.................... 0.54
Samsung C&T Trading and Investment Group... 0.54
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to parties to this proceeding
the calculations performed in reaching the preliminary results within
five days of the date of publication of these preliminary results.\5\
Interested parties may submit written arguments (case briefs) within 30
days of publication of the preliminary results and rebuttal comments
(rebuttal briefs) within five days after the time limit for filing the
case briefs.\6\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2), rebuttal briefs must
be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. Parties who submit
arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) Statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); 351.309(d)(1); and 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice.\7\ Requests should contain the party's
name, address, and telephone number, the number of participants, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made,
we will inform parties of the scheduled date for the hearing, which
will be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and location to be
determined.\8\ Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parties are reminded that briefs and hearing requests are to be
filed electronically using ACCESS and that electronically filed
documents must be received successfully in their entirety by 5:00 p.m.
Eastern Time on the due date.
Unless the deadline is extended pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act, the Department will issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of our analysis of the
issues raised by parties in their comments, within 120 days after
issuance of these preliminary results.
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit Requirements
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review. We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
The Department also intends to instruct CBP to collect cash
deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts indicated
above for each company listed on shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication of the final
[[Page 13794]]
results of this administrative review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing
duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
This administrative review and notice are in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Intent To Rescind the 2015 Administrative Review, in Part
IV. Non-Selected Rate
V. Scope of the Order
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
A. Allocation Period
B. Attribution of Subsidies
C. Benchmarks for Long-Term Loans and Discount Rates
D. Denominators
VII. Analysis of Programs
A. Programs Preliminarily Determined To Be Countervailable
B. Programs Preliminarily Determined Not To Confer a Measurable
Benefit
C. Programs Preliminarily Determined To Not Be Countervailable
D. Other Programs
E. Additional Programs Preliminarily Determined To Be Not Used
During the POR
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017-05132 Filed 3-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P