Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 12796-12798 [2017-04415]
Download as PDF
12796
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 7, 2017 / Notices
transactions. In addition, the
Department will calculate an estimated
ad valorem importer-specific
assessment rate to determine whether
this rate is de minimis, however, the
Department will direct CBP to assess
importer-specific assessment rates based
on the resulting per-unit rates.15 Where
an importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis, the Department will instruct
CBP to collect the appropriate duties at
the time of liquidation. Where either the
respondent’s weighted average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate appropriate entries without
regard to antidumping duties.16
Pursuant to Departmental practice, for
entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales database submitted by an
exporter individually examined during
this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the rate for the PRC-wide entity.17
Because no party requested a review of
the PRC-wide entity, the entity is not
under review and the entity’s rate (i.e.,
165.04 percent) is not subject to
change.18 Additionally, if the
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s CBP case number will be
liquidated at the rate for the PRC-wide
entity.
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results
of this review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise covered by the
final results of this review and for future
deposits of estimated antidumping
duties, where applicable.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The Department will instruct CBP to
require a cash deposit for antidumping
duties equal to the weighted-average
amount by which the normal value
exceeds U.S. price. The following cash
deposit requirements will be effective
for shipments of the subject
merchandise from the PRC entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
15 Id.
16 See
Final Modification, 77 FR at 8103.
Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion
of this practice.
18 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 79 FR 76970 (December 23, 2014).
17 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Mar 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
date of this notice, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
the exporters listed above, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this
review (except, if the rate is de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then the cash
deposit rate will be zero for that
exporter); (2) for previously investigated
or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recently completed segment of
this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters
of subject merchandise which have not
been found to be entitled to a separate
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., 165.04
percent) 19 and (4) for all non-PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties and/or
countervailing duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
and/or countervailing duties has
occurred, and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties and/or increase the amount of
antidumping duties by the amount of
the countervailing duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Review
4. Extension of Preliminary Results
5. Scope of the Order
19 See
PO 00000
Final Determination at 76973.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
7. Selection of Respondents
8. Single Entity Treatment
9. Discussion of the Methodology
a. Non-Market Economy Country
b. Separate Rates
c. Rate for Non-Examined, Separate Rate
Respondents
d. Application of Facts Available
e. Surrogate Country Selection
f. Date of Sale
g. Fair Value Comparisons
h. U.S. Price
i. Normal Value
j. Adjustments for Countervailable
Subsidies
k. Currency Conversion
10. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–04420 Filed 3–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–876]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
Japan: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that steel concrete
reinforcing bar (rebar) from Japan is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV). The period of investigation
(POI) is July 1, 2015, through June 30,
2016. The estimated dumping margins
of sales at LTFV are listed in the
‘‘Preliminary Determination’’ section of
this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective March 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
This preliminary determination is
made in accordance with section 733(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). The Department published the
notice of initiation of this investigation
on October 18, 2016.1 For a complete
1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan,
Taiwan and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 7, 2017 / Notices
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this investigation, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.2 A list of topics included in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is included as Appendix II to this
notice. The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is rebar from Japan. For a
complete description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to
the Department’s regulations,3 the
Initiation Notice set aside a period of
time for parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).4 No
interested party commented on the
scope of the investigation as it appeared
in the Initiation Notice. However,
because the investigation pertains to
rebar from Japan, the Department
preliminarily modified the scope
language as it appeared in the Initiation
Notice to remove the language
pertaining to the scope of the
countervailing duty investigation of
rebar from Turkey. See the scope in
Appendix I to this notice.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. Both mandatory
respondents, Jonan Steel Corporation
(Jonan) and Kyoei Steel Ltd. (Kyoei),
failed to participate in this investigation
by not responding to the Deparment’s
Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR 71697
(October 18, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Determination in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation of Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bar From Japan’’ dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
3 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties;
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
4 See Initiation Notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Mar 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
initial questionnaire.5 As a result,
pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.308, the
Department has preliminarily relied
upon facts otherwise available, with
adverse inferences, to assign an
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin to the Jonan and Kyoei. For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our preliminary conclusions,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
full description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that rebar from Japan is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at LTFV, pursuant to
section 733 of the Act, and that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist:
All-Others Rate
Sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that, in
the preliminary determination, the
Department shall determine an
estimated all-others rate for all exporters
and producers not individually
investigated, which shall be an amount
equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping
margins established for exporters and
producers individually investigated,
excluding any zero and de minimis
margins, and any margins determined
entirely under section 776 of the Act.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
Act, if the estimated weighted-average
dumping margins established for all
exporters and producers individually
examined are zero, de minimis or
determined based entirely under section
776 of the Act, the Department may use
any reasonable method to establish the
estimated dumping margin for all other
producers or exporters.
As noted above, we determined the
dumping margin for the individually
examined companies Jonan and Kyoei
under section 776 of the Act.
Consequently, the only available
dumping margins for this preliminary
determination are found in the petition
and are margins upon which we
initiated this investigation. Pursuant to
section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the
Department’s practice under these
circumstances has been to calculate the
‘‘all-others’’’ rate as a simple average of
these margins from the petition.6 For a
5 See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
e.g., Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite From
the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909,
21912 (April 23, 2008), unchanged in Notice of
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Sodium Nitrite From the Federal Republic of
Germany, 73 FR 38986, 38987 (July 8, 2008), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 2; see also Notice of Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Raw Flexible
Magnets From Taiwan, 73 FR 39673, 39674 (July 10,
2008); Steel Threaded Rod From Thailand:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR
79670, 79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in
Steel Threaded Rod From Thailand: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
6 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12797
Exporter/producer
Jonan Steel Corporation .............
Kyoei Steel Ltd ...........................
All-Others ....................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
209.46
209.46
206.43
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, the Department will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of subject merchandise as
described in the ‘‘scope of the
investigation’’ section of this notice
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, as discussed below.7 Further,
pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), the
Department will instruct CBP to require
a cash deposit equal to the dumping
margins, as indicated in the chart above,
as follows: (1) The rate for the
mandatory respondents listed above
will be the respondent-specific rates we
determined in this preliminary
determination; (2) if the exporter is not
a mandatory respondent identified
above, but the producer is, the rate will
be the specific rate established for the
producer of the subject merchandise;
and (3) the rate for all other producers
or exporters will be the ‘‘all-others’’ rate.
This suspension of liquidation
instruction will remain in effect until
further notice.8
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with a
preliminary determination within five
days of its public announcement or, if
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances, 79 FR 14476, 14477 (March 14,
2014).
7 See Appendix I.
8 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the
Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional
Measures Period in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
12798
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 43 / Tuesday, March 7, 2017 / Notices
there is no public announcement,
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However,
because the Department preliminarily
applied AFA to both Jonan and Kyoei,
in accordance with section 776 of the
Act, there are no calculations to
disclose.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Verification
Because the mandatory respondents
in this investigation did not provide
information requested by the
Department and the Department
preliminarily determines each of the
mandatory respondents to have been
uncooperative, verification will not be
conducted.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination. Case briefs or other
written comments may be submitted to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, and rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in case briefs, may be
submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for case briefs.9
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and
(d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities. All
documents must be filed electronically
using ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully
in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time on the date the
document is due.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, limited to issues raised in the
case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a
written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice.10 Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, whether any
participant is a foreign national, and a
list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230,11 at a time and
9 See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303
(for general filing requirements).
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
11 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Mar 06, 2017
Jkt 241001
date to be determined. Parties should
confirm by telephone the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before
the scheduled date.
Final Determination
In accordance with Section 735(a)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), we
will make the final determination no
later than 75 days after the signature
date of this preliminary determination.
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we are notifying the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
our preliminary determination. If our
final determination is affirmative, the
ITC will determine before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after our final determination whether
these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S.
industry.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to this
investigation is steel concrete reinforcing bar
imported in either straight length or coil form
(rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length,
diameter, or grade or lack thereof. Subject
merchandise includes deformed steel wire
with bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or
grade) and which has been subjected to an
elongation test.
The subject merchandise includes rebar
that has been further processed in the subject
country or a third country, including but not
limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing,
painting, coating, or any other processing
that would not otherwise remove the
merchandise from the scope of the
investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the rebar.
Specifically excluded are plain rounds
(i.e., nondeformed or smooth rebar). Also
excluded from the scope is deformed steel
wire meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no
bar markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade)
and without being subject to an elongation
test.
The subject merchandise is classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) primarily under item
numbers 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and
7228.30.8010. The subject merchandise may
also enter under other HTSUS numbers
including 7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000,
7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018, 7221.00.0030,
7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7227.90.6030, 7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040,
7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000.
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the scope
remains dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Use of Facts Available with Adverse
Inferences
A. Application of Facts Available
B. Use of Adverse Inferences
C. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA
Rate
VI. All-Others Rate
VII. Verification
VIII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017–04415 Filed 3–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–810 and A–583–815]
Welded ASTM A–312 Stainless Steel
Pipe From South Korea and Taiwan:
Final Results of the Expedited Fourth
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping
Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective March 7, 2017.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the antidumping duty orders on
welded ASTM A–312 stainless steel
pipe from South Korea and Taiwan
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping. The
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail is indicated in the
‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone
(202) 482–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The antidumping duty orders on
welded ASTM A–312 stainless steel
pipe from South Korea and Taiwan were
published on December 30, 1992.1 On
1 See Antidumping Duty Order and Clarification
of Final Determination: Certain Welded Stainless
E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM
07MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12796-12798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04415]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-588-876]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan: Preliminary
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily
determines that steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Japan is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair
value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2015,
through June 30, 2016. The estimated dumping margins of sales at LTFV
are listed in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective March 7, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This preliminary determination is made in accordance with section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department
published the notice of initiation of this investigation on October 18,
2016.\1\ For a complete
[[Page 12797]]
description of the events that followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated
concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by this
notice.\2\ A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic
version are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan, Taiwan and
the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair Value
Investigations, 81 FR 71697 (October 18, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Steel
Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Japan'' dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is rebar from Japan. For
a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix
I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the preamble to the Department's regulations,\3\
the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\4\ No interested party
commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. However, because the investigation pertains to rebar
from Japan, the Department preliminarily modified the scope language as
it appeared in the Initiation Notice to remove the language pertaining
to the scope of the countervailing duty investigation of rebar from
Turkey. See the scope in Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
\4\ See Initiation Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Act. Both mandatory respondents, Jonan Steel
Corporation (Jonan) and Kyoei Steel Ltd. (Kyoei), failed to participate
in this investigation by not responding to the Deparment's initial
questionnaire.\5\ As a result, pursuant to section 776(a) and (b) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.308, the Department has preliminarily relied
upon facts otherwise available, with adverse inferences, to assign an
estimated weighted-average dumping margin to the Jonan and Kyoei. For a
full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others Rate
Sections 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) and 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provide that,
in the preliminary determination, the Department shall determine an
estimated all-others rate for all exporters and producers not
individually investigated, which shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers individually investigated,
excluding any zero and de minimis margins, and any margins determined
entirely under section 776 of the Act.
Pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, if the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins established for all exporters and
producers individually examined are zero, de minimis or determined
based entirely under section 776 of the Act, the Department may use any
reasonable method to establish the estimated dumping margin for all
other producers or exporters.
As noted above, we determined the dumping margin for the
individually examined companies Jonan and Kyoei under section 776 of
the Act. Consequently, the only available dumping margins for this
preliminary determination are found in the petition and are margins
upon which we initiated this investigation. Pursuant to section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department's practice under these
circumstances has been to calculate the ``all-others''' rate as a
simple average of these margins from the petition.\6\ For a full
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite From the Federal Republic of
Germany, 73 FR 21909, 21912 (April 23, 2008), unchanged in Notice of
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite
From the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 38986, 38987 (July 8,
2008), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2;
see also Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Raw Flexible Magnets From Taiwan, 73 FR 39673, 39674 (July
10, 2008); Steel Threaded Rod From Thailand: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR 79670,
79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in Steel Threaded Rod From
Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR
14476, 14477 (March 14, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that rebar from Japan is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at LTFV, pursuant
to section 733 of the Act, and that the following weighted-average
dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jonan Steel Corporation..................................... 209.46
Kyoei Steel Ltd............................................. 209.46
All-Others.................................................. 206.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, the Department
will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of all entries of subject merchandise as described in the
``scope of the investigation'' section of this notice entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register, as discussed
below.\7\ Further, pursuant to section 733(d)(1)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(d), the Department will instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the dumping margins, as indicated in the chart above,
as follows: (1) The rate for the mandatory respondents listed above
will be the respondent-specific rates we determined in this preliminary
determination; (2) if the exporter is not a mandatory respondent
identified above, but the producer is, the rate will be the specific
rate established for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (3)
the rate for all other producers or exporters will be the ``all-
others'' rate. This suspension of liquidation instruction will remain
in effect until further notice.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Appendix I.
\8\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with a preliminary determination
within five days of its public announcement or, if
[[Page 12798]]
there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
However, because the Department preliminarily applied AFA to both Jonan
and Kyoei, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, there are no
calculations to disclose.
Verification
Because the mandatory respondents in this investigation did not
provide information requested by the Department and the Department
preliminarily determines each of the mandatory respondents to have been
uncooperative, verification will not be conducted.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination. Case briefs or other written comments may be submitted
to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance no later than
30 days after the date of publication of this notice, and rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be submitted no
later than five days after the deadline date for case briefs.\9\
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. All documents must be
filed electronically using ACCESS. An electronically filed document
must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time on the date the document is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309; see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\10\ Requests should
contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of
participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list
of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, the
Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,\11\ at a
time and date to be determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the
date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
In accordance with Section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(1), we will make the final determination no later than 75
days after the signature date of this preliminary determination.
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we are notifying the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of our preliminary determination.
If our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine
before the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary
determination or 45 days after our final determination whether these
imports are materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the
U.S. industry.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: February 28, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to this investigation is steel concrete
reinforcing bar imported in either straight length or coil form
(rebar) regardless of metallurgy, length, diameter, or grade or lack
thereof. Subject merchandise includes deformed steel wire with bar
markings (e.g., mill mark, size, or grade) and which has been
subjected to an elongation test.
The subject merchandise includes rebar that has been further
processed in the subject country or a third country, including but
not limited to cutting, grinding, galvanizing, painting, coating, or
any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise
from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of
manufacture of the rebar.
Specifically excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or
smooth rebar). Also excluded from the scope is deformed steel wire
meeting ASTM A1064/A1064M with no bar markings (e.g., mill mark,
size, or grade) and without being subject to an elongation test.
The subject merchandise is classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) primarily under item numbers
7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010. The subject
merchandise may also enter under other HTSUS numbers including
7215.90.1000, 7215.90.5000, 7221.00.0017, 7221.00.0018,
7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, 7222.11.0001, 7222.11.0057,
7222.11.0059, 7222.30.0001, 7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6030,
7227.90.6035, 7227.90.6040, 7228.20.1000, and 7228.60.6000.
HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes;
however, the written description of the scope remains dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Use of Facts Available with Adverse Inferences
A. Application of Facts Available
B. Use of Adverse Inferences
C. Selection and Corroboration of the AFA Rate
VI. All-Others Rate
VII. Verification
VIII. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017-04415 Filed 3-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P