Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Spain: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 9723-9726 [2017-02606]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department’s change in policy
regarding conditional review of the
PRC-wide entity applies to this AR.4
Aside from RZBC, for which the AR is
being rescinded, the Department
considers all other companies for which
a review was requested to be part of the
PRC-wide entity. Because Taihe did not
respond to the Department’s original
questionnaire and did not provide
separate rate information, Taihe has not
established its eligibility for separate
rate status and, therefore, is part of the
PRC-wide entity.
In addition to Taihe, 14 companies
listed in the Initiation Notice and, thus,
subject to this AR, failed to provide
separate rate applications or separate
rate certifications necessary to establish
their eligibility for a separate rate.
Therefore, the Department preliminarily
determines that these 14 companies are
not eligible for a separate rate and are
part of the PRC-wide entity.
The rate previously established for the
PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is
156.87 percent.5 For additional
information, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Disclosure and Public Comment
Interested parties may submit case
briefs and/or written comments, filed
electronically using ACCESS, within 30
days of the date of publication of these
preliminary results of review.6 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, will be due five days after
the due date for case briefs.7 Parties who
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are requested to submit with
each argument a statement of the issue,
a summary of the argument not to
exceed five pages, and a table of
authorities.8
Further, interested parties who wish
to request a hearing must submit a
written request to the Assistant
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). Under this policy,
the PRC-wide entity will not be under review
unless a party specifically requests, or the
Department self-initiates, a review of the entity.
Because no party requested a review of the PRCwide entity in this review, the entity’s rate (i.e.,
156.87 percent) is not subject to change.
5 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from
the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014, 80 FR 77323, 77324 (December 14, 2015).
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the
publication of this notice.9
Electronically filed case briefs/written
comments and hearing requests must be
received successfully in their entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time, within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.10 Hearing
requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
those issues raised in the respective case
briefs. If a request for a hearing is made,
parties will be notified of the time and
date of the hearing which will be held
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this AR, including the
results of its analysis of the issues raised
in any written briefs, not later than 120
days after the date of publication of this
notice, unless extended, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the publication date of the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries of subject merchandise
from the PRC-wide entity, including
entries of subject merchandise from
Taihe, at 156.87 percent (the PRC-wide
rate).12
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
AR for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the publication date of the final
results of review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters which are not
under review in this segment of the
proceeding but which have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be the exporter-specific rate
published for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding;
(2) for all PRC exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCwide entity, 156.87 percent; and (3) for
all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the PRC
exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: January 31, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Partial Rescission
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–02528 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–469–815]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
Spain: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain are being, or are
AGENCY:
9 See
19 CFR 351.310(c).
10 Id.
11 See
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
12 For
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9723
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
9724
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV). The period
of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015,
through March 31, 2016. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margins of
sales at LTFV are shown in the
‘‘Preliminary Determination’’ section of
this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Flessner or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6312 or (202) 482–0167,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Department initiated this
investigation on July 20, 2016.1 We
selected one mandatory respondent in
this investigation, ULMA Forja, S.Coop
(ULMA), which accounted for all
imports of finished carbon steel flanges
from Spain during the POI.2 For a
complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum that is dated
concurrently with this determination
and hereby adopted by this notice.3 A
list of topics in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
II to this notice.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Department’s Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India,
Italy, and Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 81 FR 49619 (July 28, 2016)
(Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum from Mark Flessner to
Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
entitled, ‘‘Respondent Selection for the
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon
Steel Flanges from Spain,’’ dated November 18,
2016 (Respondent Selection Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Determination in
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,’’ dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain. For a full
description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation,’’ in Appendix I of this
notice.
Scope Comments
We received no comments from
interested parties regarding the scope of
the investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. The scope published
in the Initiation Notice contained
typographical errors, which have been
corrected in Appendix I.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Pursuant to section
776(a) of the Act, the Department
preliminarily relied upon facts
otherwise available to assign an
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin to the mandatory respondent in
this investigation, because ULMA did
not submit a response to the
Department’s questionnaire.4 Further,
the Department preliminarily
determines that ULMA failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of its
ability to comply with a request for
information, and has applied an adverse
inference in selecting from the facts
otherwise available (AFA) for ULMA, in
accordance with section 776(b) of Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
preliminary determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act
provides that in the preliminary
determination the Department shall
determine an estimated ‘‘all-others’’ rate
for all exporters and producers not
individually investigated, in accordance
with section 735(c)(5) of the Act.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states
that generally the estimated rate for all4 See Letter from ULMA to the Secretary of
Commerce entitled, ‘‘ULMA Piping’s Notice of
Intent Not To Respond To The Department’s
Questionnaire—Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from
Spain,’’ dated September 30, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
others shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margin
determined for the individually
examined respondent in this
preliminary determination was
determined entirely under section 776
of the Act. In an investigation where no
weighted-average dumping margins
other than zero, de minimis, or those
determined entirely under section 776
of the Act have been established for
individually examined entities, in
accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act, the Department has previously
used the simple average of the margins
calculated in the petition and applied
the result to ‘‘all-other’’ entities not
individually examined.5
With respect to Spain, the petitioners
calculated two margins in the Petition.6
Thus, consistent with our practice, we
preliminarily assigned as the ‘‘allothers’’ rate in this investigation the
simple average of the two dumping
margins calculated for subject
merchandise from Spain provided in the
Petitions, as recalculated by the
Department for initiation purposes,
which is 18.81 percent.7
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain are being, or are
likely to be, sold in the United States at
LTFV, pursuant to section 733 of the
Act, and that the following estimated
5 See Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR
79670, 79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in
Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances, 79 FR 14476, 14477 (March 14,
2014); see also Notice of Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite
from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909
(April 23, 2008); unchanged in Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of
Germany, 73 FR 38986 (July 8, 2008).
6 See Letter from Weldbend Corporation and
Boltex Mfg. Co., L.P. (collectively, petitioners) to
the Secretary of the U.S. International Trade
Commission and the Secretary of Commerce
entitled, ‘‘Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from
Spain: 2nd Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’
dated July 13, 2016, at 2 and Exhibit 1. See also AD
Investigation Initiation Checklist: Finished Carbon
Steel Flanges from Spain (July 20, 2016) (in which
the petition margins were recalculated for purposes
of initiation).
7 Id.
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
Public Comment
weighted-average dumping margins
exist:
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination no later than 30 days
Exporter/manufacturer
after the date of publication of this
preliminary determination.9 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case
ULMA Forja, S.Coop ..................
24.43 briefs, may be submitted no later than
All Others ....................................
18.81 five days after the deadline date for case
briefs.10 Pursuant to 19 CFR
Suspension of Liquidation
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
this proceeding are encouraged to
of the Act, we will direct U.S. Customs
submit with each argument: (1) A
and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
liquidation of all entries of finished
summary of the argument; and (3) a
carbon steel flanges from Spain, as
table of authorities.
described in the Scope of the
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
Investigation in Appendix I, that are
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Register.
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
Pursuant to section 733(d) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we will instruct of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
CBP to require cash deposits 8 equal to
address, and telephone number, the
the weighted-average amount by which
number of participants, and a list of the
the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as
indicated in the chart above, as follows: issues to be discussed. If a request for
a hearing is made, the Department
(1) The rate for the mandatory
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
respondent listed above will be the
respondent-specific rate we determined Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
in this preliminary determination; (2) if
DC 20230, at a time and date to be
the exporter is not a mandatory
determined. Parties should confirm by
respondent identified above, but the
producer is, the rate will be the specific telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
rate established for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (3) the rate for scheduled date.
all other producers or exporters will be
All documents must be filed
the all-others rate. The suspension of
electronically using ACCESS. An
liquidation instructions will remain in
electronically-filed request must be
effect until further notice.
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard
Disclosure
Time.
Normally, the Department discloses to
International Trade Commission (ITC)
interested parties the calculations
Notification
performed in connection with a
preliminary determination within five
In accordance with section 733(f) of
days after public announcement of the
the Act, we are notifying the ITC of our
preliminary determination in
affirmative preliminary determination of
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
sales at LTFV. If our final determination
Because the Department preliminarily
is affirmative, the ITC will determine
applied a rate from the Petition as AFA
before the later of 120 days after the date
to the mandatory respondent in this
of this preliminary determination or 45
investigation, there are no calculations
days after our final determination
to disclose.
whether these imports are materially
injuring, or threaten material injury to,
Verification
the U.S. industry.
Because the mandatory respondent in
This determination is issued and
this investigation did not provide the
published in accordance with sections
information requested, the Department
733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
will not conduct verifications.
CFR 351.205(c).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
8 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the
Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional
Measures Period in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
10 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9725
Dated: January 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers
finished carbon steel flanges. Finished
carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished
carbon steel flanges (also known as carbon
steel flange forgings) in that they have
undergone further processing after forging,
including, but not limited to, beveling, bore
threading, center or step boring, face
machining, taper boring, machining ends or
surfaces, drilling bolt holes, and/or deburring or shot blasting. Any one of these
post-forging processes suffices to render the
forging into a finished carbon steel flange for
purposes of this investigation. However,
mere heat treatment of a carbon steel flange
forging (without any other further processing
after forging) does not render the forging into
a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of
this investigation.
While these finished carbon steel flanges
are generally manufactured to specification
ASME B16.5 or ASME B16.47 series A or
series B, the scope is not limited to flanges
produced under those specifications. All
types of finished carbon steel flanges are
included in the scope regardless of pipe size
(which may or may not be expressed in
inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class
(usually, but not necessarily, expressed in
pounds of pressure, e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600,
900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face (e.g., flat
face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration
(e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap
joint, threaded, etc.), wall thickness (usually,
but not necessarily, expressed in inches),
normalization, or whether or not heat treated.
These carbon steel flanges either meet or
exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105,
ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and
ASTM A707 standards (or comparable
foreign specifications). The scope includes
any flanges produced to the above-referenced
ASTM standards as currently stated or as
may be amended. The term ‘‘carbon steel’’
under this scope is steel in which:
(a) Iron predominates, by weight, over each
of the other contained elements;
(b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less,
by weight; and
(c) none of the elements listed below
exceeds the quantity, by weight, as indicated:
(i) 0.87 percent of aluminum;
(ii) 0.0105 percent of boron;
(iii) 10.10 percent of chromium;
(iv) 1.55 percent of columbium;
(v) 3.10 percent of copper;
(vi) 0.38 percent of lead;
(vii) 3.04 percent of manganese;
(viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum;
(ix) 20.15 percent of nickel;
(x) 1.55 percent of niobium;
(xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen;
(xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus;
(xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon;
(xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur;
(xv) 1.05 percent of titanium;
(xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten;
(xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
9726
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium.
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently
classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010
and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They
may also be entered under HTSUS
subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Scope of the Investigation
5. Scope Comments
6. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Adverse Inference
7. Calculation of All-Others Rate
8. Verification
9. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017–02606 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Special
Subsistence Permits and Harvest Logs
for Pacific Halibut in Waters Off Alaska
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 10, 2017.
DATES:
Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instruments and instructions should be
directed to Rachel Baker, (907) 586–
7425 or rachel.baker@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
I. Abstract
This request is for extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
This information collection describes
special permits issued to participants in
the Pacific halibut subsistence fishery in
waters off the coast of Alaska and any
appeals resulting from denials. The
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) designed the permits to work in
conjunction with other halibut harvest
assessment measures. Subsistence
fishing for halibut has occurred for
many years among the Alaska Native
people and non-Native people. Special
permits are initiated in response to the
concerns of Native and community
groups regarding increased restrictions
in International Pacific Halibut
Commission Area 2C and include
Community Harvest Permits,
Ceremonial Permits, and Educational
Permits.
A Community Harvest Permit allows
the community or Alaska Native tribe to
appoint one or more individuals from
its respective community or tribe to
harvest subsistence halibut from a single
vessel under reduced gear and harvest
restrictions.
Ceremonial and Educational Permits
are available exclusively to Alaska
Native tribes. Eligible Alaska Native
tribes may appoint only one Ceremonial
Permit Coordinator per tribe for
Ceremonial Permits or one authorized
Instructor per tribe for Educational
Permits.
Except for enrolled students fishing
under a valid Educational Permit,
special permits require persons fishing
under them to also possess a
Subsistence Halibut Registration
Certificate (SHARC) (see OMB No.
0648–0460) which identifies those
persons who are currently eligible for
subsistence halibut fishing. Each of the
instruments is designed to minimize the
reporting burden on subsistence halibut
fishermen while retrieving essential
information.
Respondents have a choice of either
electronic or paper forms. Methods of
submittal include online, email of
electronic forms, mail, and facsimile
transmission of paper forms.
Educational Permits may not be applied
for online.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–0512.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a currently approved
collection).
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: February 3, 2017.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–02591 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
II. Method of Collection
PO 00000
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; state, local, or tribal
government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
33.
Estimated Time per Response: Permit
applications, 10 minutes; Community
harvest log, 30 minutes; Ceremonial or
educational harvest log, 30 minutes;
Appeal for permit denial, 4 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 17.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $21 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs.
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (CNCS), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA95) . This program helps to ensure
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9723-9726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-469-815]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Spain: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel flanges from Spain are being, or
are
[[Page 9724]]
likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV).
The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through March 31,
2016. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales at LTFV
are shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Flessner or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6312 or (202) 482-0167,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this investigation on July 20, 2016.\1\ We
selected one mandatory respondent in this investigation, ULMA Forja,
S.Coop (ULMA), which accounted for all imports of finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain during the POI.\2\ For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of this investigation, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum that is dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by this notice.\3\ A list of topics in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix II to this
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy, and
Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 81 FR
49619 (July 28, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum from Mark Flessner to Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, entitled, ``Respondent Selection for the Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,''
dated November 18, 2016 (Respondent Selection Memorandum).
\3\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,'' dated concurrently with this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department's
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain. For a full description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in Appendix I of
this notice.
Scope Comments
We received no comments from interested parties regarding the scope
of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. The scope
published in the Initiation Notice contained typographical errors,
which have been corrected in Appendix I.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Pursuant
to section 776(a) of the Act, the Department preliminarily relied upon
facts otherwise available to assign an estimated weighted-average
dumping margin to the mandatory respondent in this investigation,
because ULMA did not submit a response to the Department's
questionnaire.\4\ Further, the Department preliminarily determines that
ULMA failed to cooperate by not acting to the best of its ability to
comply with a request for information, and has applied an adverse
inference in selecting from the facts otherwise available (AFA) for
ULMA, in accordance with section 776(b) of Act. For a full description
of the methodology underlying our preliminary determination, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Letter from ULMA to the Secretary of Commerce entitled,
``ULMA Piping's Notice of Intent Not To Respond To The Department's
Questionnaire--Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain,'' dated
September 30, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All-Others Rate
Section 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that in the
preliminary determination the Department shall determine an estimated
``all-others'' rate for all exporters and producers not individually
investigated, in accordance with section 735(c)(5) of the Act. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that generally the estimated rate for
all-others shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776
of the Act. The estimated weighted-average dumping margin determined
for the individually examined respondent in this preliminary
determination was determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. In
an investigation where no weighted-average dumping margins other than
zero, de minimis, or those determined entirely under section 776 of the
Act have been established for individually examined entities, in
accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the Department has
previously used the simple average of the margins calculated in the
petition and applied the result to ``all-other'' entities not
individually examined.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR 79670,
79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in Steel Threaded Rod from
Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR
14476, 14477 (March 14, 2014); see also Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from
the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909 (April 23, 2008);
unchanged in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73
FR 38986 (July 8, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Spain, the petitioners calculated two margins in
the Petition.\6\ Thus, consistent with our practice, we preliminarily
assigned as the ``all-others'' rate in this investigation the simple
average of the two dumping margins calculated for subject merchandise
from Spain provided in the Petitions, as recalculated by the Department
for initiation purposes, which is 18.81 percent.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Letter from Weldbend Corporation and Boltex Mfg. Co.,
L.P. (collectively, petitioners) to the Secretary of the U.S.
International Trade Commission and the Secretary of Commerce
entitled, ``Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain: 2nd
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated July 13, 2016, at 2 and
Exhibit 1. See also AD Investigation Initiation Checklist: Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from Spain (July 20, 2016) (in which the
petition margins were recalculated for purposes of initiation).
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Spain are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United
States at LTFV, pursuant to section 733 of the Act, and that the
following estimated
[[Page 9725]]
weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/manufacturer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ULMA Forja, S.Coop.......................................... 24.43
All Others.................................................. 18.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of finished carbon steel flanges from Spain, as described in
the Scope of the Investigation in Appendix I, that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we
will instruct CBP to require cash deposits \8\ equal to the weighted-
average amount by which the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as
indicated in the chart above, as follows: (1) The rate for the
mandatory respondent listed above will be the respondent-specific rate
we determined in this preliminary determination; (2) if the exporter is
not a mandatory respondent identified above, but the producer is, the
rate will be the specific rate established for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (3) the rate for all other producers or
exporters will be the all-others rate. The suspension of liquidation
instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with a preliminary determination
within five days after public announcement of the preliminary
determination in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Because the
Department preliminarily applied a rate from the Petition as AFA to the
mandatory respondent in this investigation, there are no calculations
to disclose.
Verification
Because the mandatory respondent in this investigation did not
provide the information requested, the Department will not conduct
verifications.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination no later than 30 days after the date of publication of
this preliminary determination.\9\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for case briefs.\10\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)
and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the
hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically-filed request must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we are notifying the
ITC of our affirmative preliminary determination of sales at LTFV. If
our final determination is affirmative, the ITC will determine before
the later of 120 days after the date of this preliminary determination
or 45 days after our final determination whether these imports are
materially injuring, or threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry.
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: January 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers finished carbon steel
flanges. Finished carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished carbon
steel flanges (also known as carbon steel flange forgings) in that
they have undergone further processing after forging, including, but
not limited to, beveling, bore threading, center or step boring,
face machining, taper boring, machining ends or surfaces, drilling
bolt holes, and/or de-burring or shot blasting. Any one of these
post-forging processes suffices to render the forging into a
finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this investigation.
However, mere heat treatment of a carbon steel flange forging
(without any other further processing after forging) does not render
the forging into a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of this
investigation.
While these finished carbon steel flanges are generally
manufactured to specification ASME B16.5 or ASME B16.47 series A or
series B, the scope is not limited to flanges produced under those
specifications. All types of finished carbon steel flanges are
included in the scope regardless of pipe size (which may or may not
be expressed in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class
(usually, but not necessarily, expressed in pounds of pressure,
e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600, 900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face
(e.g., flat face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration
(e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap joint, threaded, etc.),
wall thickness (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in inches),
normalization, or whether or not heat treated. These carbon steel
flanges either meet or exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105,
ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and ASTM A707 standards (or
comparable foreign specifications). The scope includes any flanges
produced to the above-referenced ASTM standards as currently stated
or as may be amended. The term ``carbon steel'' under this scope is
steel in which:
(a) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other
contained elements;
(b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and
(c) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, as indicated:
(i) 0.87 percent of aluminum;
(ii) 0.0105 percent of boron;
(iii) 10.10 percent of chromium;
(iv) 1.55 percent of columbium;
(v) 3.10 percent of copper;
(vi) 0.38 percent of lead;
(vii) 3.04 percent of manganese;
(viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum;
(ix) 20.15 percent of nickel;
(x) 1.55 percent of niobium;
(xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen;
(xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus;
(xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon;
(xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur;
(xv) 1.05 percent of titanium;
(xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten;
(xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or
[[Page 9726]]
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium.
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classified under
subheadings 7307.91.5010 and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also be entered
under HTSUS subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Scope of the Investigation
5. Scope Comments
6. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference
7. Calculation of All-Others Rate
8. Verification
9. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017-02606 Filed 2-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P