Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Italy: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 9711-9714 [2017-02605]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
Suspension Agreements
None.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters. If the interested party intends
for the Secretary to review sales of
merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which was produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Note that, for any party the
Department was unable to locate in
prior segments, the Department will not
accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new
information as to the party’s location.
Moreover, if the interested party who
files a request for review is unable to
locate the producer or exporter for
which it requested the review, the
interested party must provide an
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011), the Department
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders.2
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
The Department no longer considers
the non-market economy (NME) entity
as an exporter conditionally subject to
an antidumping duty administrative
reviews.3 Accordingly, the NME entity
will not be under review unless the
Department specifically receives a
request for, or self-initiates, a review of
the NME entity.4 In administrative
reviews of antidumping duty orders on
merchandise from NME countries where
a review of the NME entity has not been
initiated, but where an individual
exporter for which a review was
initiated does not qualify for a separate
rate, the Department will issue a final
decision indicating that the company in
question is part of the NME entity.
However, in that situation, because no
review of the NME entity was
conducted, the NME entity’s entries
were not subject to the review and the
rate for the NME entity is not subject to
change as a result of that review
(although the rate for the individual
exporter may change as a function of the
finding that the exporter is part of the
NME entity). Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
when there is no review requested of the
NME entity, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were
suspended at the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’)
on Enforcement and Compliance’s
ACCESS Web site at https://
access.trade.gov.5 Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i),
a copy of each request must be served
on the petitioner and each exporter or
producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of February 2017. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
3 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013)
4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9711
day of February 2017, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: February 2, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–02522 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–835]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From
Italy: Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Italy are being, or are likely
to be, sold in the United States at less
than fair value (LTFV). The period of
investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015,
through March 31, 2016. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margins of
sales at LTFV are shown in the
‘‘Preliminary Determination’’ section of
this notice. Interested parties are invited
to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edythe Artman or Moses Song, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
9712
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3931 or (202) 482–5041,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this
investigation on July 20, 2016.1 We
selected two mandatory respondents in
this investigation, Metalfar Prodotti
Industriali S.p.A. (Metalfar) and
Officine Ambrogio Melesi & C. S.r.l.
(Melesi). For a complete description of
the events that followed the initiation of
this investigation, see the memorandum
that is dated concurrently with this
determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.2 A list of topics in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as Appendix II to this notice.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is made available to the public via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and is available to all
parties in the Department’s Central
Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is finished carbon steel
flanges from Italy. For a complete
description of the scope of the
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation’’ in Appendix I of this
notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope Comments
We received no comments from
interested parties regarding the scope of
the investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice. The scope published
1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India,
Italy, and Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair Value
Investigations, 81 FR 49619 (July 28, 2016)
(Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, entitled
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from
Italy’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
in the Initiation Notice contained
several typographical errors, which have
been corrected in Appendix I.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Pursuant to section
776(a) of the Act, the Department is
preliminarily relying upon facts
otherwise available to assign an
estimated weighted-average dumping
margin to the mandatory respondents in
this investigation because both
respondents failed to timely provide
necessary information requested by the
Department, withheld requested
information, and significantly impeded
the investigation. Further, the
Department is preliminarily
determining that these mandatory
respondents failed to cooperate by not
acting to the best of their abilities to
comply with requests for information
and, thus, the Department is applying
adverse facts available (AFA) to the
respondents, in accordance with section
776(b) of Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
preliminary determination, see
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act
provides that, in the preliminary
determination, the Department shall
determine an estimated ‘‘all-others’’ rate
for all exporters and producers not
individually investigated, in accordance
with section 735(c)(5) of the Act.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states
that, generally, the estimated rate for allothers shall be an amount equal to the
weighted average of the estimated
weighted-average dumping margins
established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis margins, and any
margins determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margins in
this preliminary determination were
calculated entirely under section 776 of
the Act. In cases where no weightedaverage dumping margins other than
that of zero, that of de minimis, or those
determined entirely under section 776
of the Act have been established for
individually examined entities, in
accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act, the Department has previously
used the simple average of the margins
calculated in the petition and applied
the result to ‘‘all-other’’ entities not
individually examined.3
3 See Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand:
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In the petition, Weldbend Corporation
and Boltex Manufacturing Co., L.P.
(collectively, Petitioners) calculated
three dumping margins for subject
merchandise from Italy.4 Consistent
with our practice, we preliminarily
assigned the simple average of these
margins, which results in 79.17 percent,
as the ‘‘all-others’’ rate in this
investigation.5
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Italy are being, or are likely
to be, sold in the United States at LTFV,
pursuant to section 733 of the Act, and
that the following estimated weightedaverage dumping margins exist:
Exporter/manufacturer
Metalfar Prodotti Industriali S.p.A
Officine Ambrogio Melesi & C.
S.r.l./ASFO S.p.A ....................
All Others ....................................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
204.53
204.53
79.17
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2)
of the Act, we will direct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of all entries of finished
Fair Value and Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR
79670, 79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in
Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances, 79 FR 14476, 14477 (March 14,
2014); see also Notice of Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite
from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909
(April 23, 2008); unchanged in Notice of Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of
Germany, 73 FR 38986 (July 8, 2008).
4 See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping
Duties on Imports of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges
from India, Italy and Spain and Countervailing
Duties on Imports from India, dated June 30, 2016
(the Petition) at Volume III; see also Letter from
Petitioners to the Department, regarding ‘‘Finished
Carbon Steel Flanges from Italy: Second
Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’ dated July
13, 2016.
5 See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive
Components From Canada: Final Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81
FR 75039 (October 28, 2016), and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2;
see also Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
Thailand: Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, and Postponement of Final
Determination, 79 FR 10487 (February 25, 2014),
and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, unchanged in Certain Oil Country
Tubular Goods From India, the Republic of Korea,
Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders;
and Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79
FR 53691 (September 10, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
carbon steel flanges from Italy, as
described in the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation’’ in Appendix I, entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Pursuant to section 733(d) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we will instruct
CBP to require cash deposits 6 equal to
the weighted-average amount by which
the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as
indicated in the chart above, as follows:
(1) The rate for the mandatory
respondents listed above will be the
respondent-specific rates we determined
in this preliminary determination; (2) if
the exporter is not a mandatory
respondent identified above, but the
producer is, the rate will be the specific
rate established for the producer of the
subject merchandise; and (3) the rate for
all other producers or exporters will be
the all-others rate. The suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in
effect until further notice.
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses
the calculations performed in
connection with a preliminary
determination to interested parties
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Because the
Department preliminarily applied total
AFA to each of the mandatory
respondents in this investigation, in
accordance with section 776 of the Act,
there are no calculations to disclose.
Verification
Because the mandatory respondents
in this investigation did not provide
information requested by the
Department, the Department will not
conduct verifications of company
responses.
Public Comment
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination no later than 30 days
after the date of publication of the
preliminary determination.7 Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in case
briefs, may be submitted no later than
five days after the deadline date for case
6 See Modification of Regulations Regarding the
Practice of Accepting Bonds During the Provisional
Measures Period in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements). The
Department has exercised its discretion under 19
CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i) to alter the time limit for
submission of case briefs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
briefs.8 Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who
submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, within 30 days after the date
of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party’s name,
address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the
issues to be discussed. If a request for
a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230, at a time and date to be
determined. Parties should confirm by
telephone the date, time, and location of
the hearing two days before the
scheduled date.
All documents must be filed
electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically-filed request must be
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time.
Postponement of Final Determination
and Extension of Provisional Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides
that a final determination may be
postponed until not later than 135 days
after the date of the publication of the
preliminary determination if, in the
event of an affirmative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by exporters who
account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in
the event of a negative preliminary
determination, a request for such
postponement is made by the petitioner.
19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that
requests by respondents for
postponement of a final determination
be accompanied by a request for
extension of provisional measures from
a four-month period to a period not
more than six months in duration.
Respondent Melesi has requested that,
in the event of an affirmative
preliminary determination in this
investigation, the Department postpone
its final determination until no later
than 135 days after the publication of
the preliminary determination in the
Federal Register, in accordance with
section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act. Melesi
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9713
also requested the extension of the
application of the provisional measures
prescribed under section 733(d) of the
Act from a four-month period to a
period not to exceed six months, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2).9
In accordance with section
735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), because (1) our
preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter
accounts for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise; and
(3) no compelling reasons for denial
exist, we are postponing the final
determination until no later than 135
days after the publication of this notice
in the Federal Register and extending
the provisional measures from a fourmonth period to a period not greater
than six months. Accordingly, we will
issue our final determination no later
than 135 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary
determination, pursuant to section
735(a)(2) of the Act.10
International Trade Commission
Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of
the Act, we are notifying the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of
our affirmative preliminary
determination of sales at LTFV. If our
final determination is affirmative, the
ITC will determine before the later of
120 days after the date of this
preliminary determination or 45 days
after our final determination whether
these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S.
industry.This determination is issued
and published in accordance with
sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: January 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers
finished carbon steel flanges. Finished
carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished
carbon steel flanges (also known as carbon
steel flange forgings) in that they have
undergone further processing after forging,
including, but not limited to, beveling, bore
threading, center or step boring, face
machining, taper boring, machining ends or
surfaces, drilling bolt holes, and/or de9 See Letter from Melesi, regarding ‘‘Antidumping
Duty Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges
from Italy: Request to Extend Antidumping Duty
Final Determination in the Event of an Affirmative
Preliminary Determination,’’ dated January 18,
2017.
10 See 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) and (e).
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9714
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 25 / Wednesday, February 8, 2017 / Notices
burring or shot blasting. Any one of these
post-forging processes suffices to render the
forging into a finished carbon steel flange for
purposes of this investigation. However,
mere heat treatment of a carbon steel flange
forging (without any other further processing
after forging) does not render the forging into
a finished carbon steel flange for purposes of
this investigation.
While these finished carbon steel flanges
are generally manufactured to specification
ASME B16.5 or ASME B16.47 series A or
series B, the scope is not limited to flanges
produced under those specifications. All
types of finished carbon steel flanges are
included in the scope regardless of pipe size
(which may or may not be expressed in
inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class
(usually, but not necessarily, expressed in
pounds of pressure, e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600,
900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face (e.g., flat
face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration
(e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap
joint, threaded, etc.), wall thickness (usually,
but not necessarily, expressed in inches),
normalization, or whether or not heat treated.
These carbon steel flanges either meet or
exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105,
ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and
ASTM A707 standards (or comparable
foreign specifications). The scope includes
any flanges produced to the above-referenced
ASTM standards as currently stated or as
may be amended. The term ‘‘carbon steel’’
under this scope is steel in which:
(a) iron predominates, by weight, over each
of the other contained elements:
(b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less,
by weight; and
(c) none of the elements listed below
exceeds the quantity, by weight, as indicated:
(i) 0.87 percent of aluminum;
(ii) 0.0105 percent of boron;
(iii) 10.10 percent of chromium;
(iv) 1.55 percent of columbium;
(v) 3.10 percent of copper;
(vi) 0.38 percent of lead;
(vii) 3.04 percent of manganese;
(viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum;
(ix) 20.15 percent of nickel;
(x) 1.55 percent of niobium;
(xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen;
(xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus;
(xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon;
(xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur;
(xv) 1.05 percent of titanium;
(xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten;
(xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium.
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently
classified under subheadings 7307.91.5010
and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They
may also be entered under HTSUS
subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070.
The HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Feb 07, 2017
Jkt 241001
4. Scope of the Investigation
5. Scope Comments
6. Postponement of Final Determination and
Extension of Provisional Measures
7. Affiliations and Collapsing of Affiliates
8. Application of Facts Available and Use of
Adverse Inference
9. Calculation of All-Others Rate
10. Verification
11. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017–02605 Filed 2–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–043]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From
the People’s Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Determination, and Final
Affirmative Critical Circumstances
Determination, in Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
stainless steel sheet and strip (stainless
sheet and strip) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC) as provided in
section 705 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For information on
the estimated subsidy rates, see the
‘‘Final Determination’’ section of this
notice. The period of investigation is
January 1, 2015, through December 31,
2015.
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Spencer Toubia or David Lindgren, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–0123 or
(202) 482–3870, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Determination on July 18,
2016.1 A summary of the events that
occurred since the Department
published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
1 See Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination and Alignment of Final
Determination with Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 81 FR 46643 (July 18, 2016)
(Preliminary Determination).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Final Decision
Memorandum.2 The Final Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Final
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Final Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version are identical in content.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) for
which we are measuring subsidies is
January 1, 2015, through December 31,
2015.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preliminary
Scope Determination, the Department
set aside a period of time for parties to
address scope issues in case briefs or
other written comments on scope
issues.3 No interested parties submitted
scope comments in case or rebuttal
briefs; therefore, the scope of this
investigation remains unchanged for
this final determination.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is stainless sheet and strip
from the PRC. For a complete
description of the scope of this
investigation, see the ‘‘Scope of the
Investigation,’’ in Appendix II of this
notice.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the
Final Decision Memorandum. A list of
the issues that parties raised, and to
which we responded in the Final
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip from the People’s Republic of
China,’’ (Final Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrently with this determination and hereby
adopted by this notice.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Stainless Steel Sheet and
Strip from the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Scope Memorandum for the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Investigations,’’ September 9, 2016.
E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM
08FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9711-9714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02605]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-835]
Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From Italy: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of
Final Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) preliminarily
determines that finished carbon steel flanges from Italy are being, or
are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value
(LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is April 1, 2015, through
March 31, 2016. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins of sales
at LTFV are shown in the ``Preliminary Determination'' section of this
notice. Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Effective February 8, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edythe Artman or Moses Song, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
[[Page 9712]]
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482-3931 or (202) 482-5041, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department initiated this investigation on July 20, 2016.\1\ We
selected two mandatory respondents in this investigation, Metalfar
Prodotti Industriali S.p.A. (Metalfar) and Officine Ambrogio Melesi &
C. S.r.l. (Melesi). For a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this investigation, see the memorandum that
is dated concurrently with this determination and hereby adopted by
this notice.\2\ A list of topics in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is included as Appendix II to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy, and
Spain: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations, 81 FR
49619 (July 28, 2016) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation
of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Italy'' (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department's
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is finished carbon steel
flanges from Italy. For a complete description of the scope of the
investigation, see the ``Scope of the Investigation'' in Appendix I of
this notice.
Scope Comments
We received no comments from interested parties regarding the scope
of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. The scope
published in the Initiation Notice contained several typographical
errors, which have been corrected in Appendix I.
Methodology
The Department is conducting this investigation in accordance with
section 731 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Pursuant
to section 776(a) of the Act, the Department is preliminarily relying
upon facts otherwise available to assign an estimated weighted-average
dumping margin to the mandatory respondents in this investigation
because both respondents failed to timely provide necessary information
requested by the Department, withheld requested information, and
significantly impeded the investigation. Further, the Department is
preliminarily determining that these mandatory respondents failed to
cooperate by not acting to the best of their abilities to comply with
requests for information and, thus, the Department is applying adverse
facts available (AFA) to the respondents, in accordance with section
776(b) of Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our
preliminary determination, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
Section 733(d)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that, in the
preliminary determination, the Department shall determine an estimated
``all-others'' rate for all exporters and producers not individually
investigated, in accordance with section 735(c)(5) of the Act. Section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that, generally, the estimated rate for
all-others shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely under section 776
of the Act. The estimated weighted-average dumping margins in this
preliminary determination were calculated entirely under section 776 of
the Act. In cases where no weighted-average dumping margins other than
that of zero, that of de minimis, or those determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act have been established for individually examined
entities, in accordance with section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act, the
Department has previously used the simple average of the margins
calculated in the petition and applied the result to ``all-other''
entities not individually examined.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Steel Threaded Rod from Thailand: Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, 78 FR 79670,
79671 (December 31, 2013), unchanged in Steel Threaded Rod from
Thailand: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR
14476, 14477 (March 14, 2014); see also Notice of Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from
the Federal Republic of Germany, 73 FR 21909 (April 23, 2008);
unchanged in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Sodium Nitrite from the Federal Republic of Germany, 73
FR 38986 (July 8, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the petition, Weldbend Corporation and Boltex Manufacturing Co.,
L.P. (collectively, Petitioners) calculated three dumping margins for
subject merchandise from Italy.\4\ Consistent with our practice, we
preliminarily assigned the simple average of these margins, which
results in 79.17 percent, as the ``all-others'' rate in this
investigation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Petitions for the Imposition of Antidumping Duties on
Imports of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India, Italy and Spain
and Countervailing Duties on Imports from India, dated June 30, 2016
(the Petition) at Volume III; see also Letter from Petitioners to
the Department, regarding ``Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from
Italy: Second Supplemental Questionnaire Response,'' dated July 13,
2016.
\5\ See Certain Iron Mechanical Transfer Drive Components From
Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 81 FR 75039 (October 28, 2016), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 2; see also Certain Oil Country
Tubular Goods From Thailand: Preliminary Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, and Postponement of Final Determination, 79 FR
10487 (February 25, 2014), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, unchanged in Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and
the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders; and
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, 79 FR 53691 (September 10, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination
The Department preliminarily determines that finished carbon steel
flanges from Italy are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United
States at LTFV, pursuant to section 733 of the Act, and that the
following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/manufacturer dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metalfar Prodotti Industriali S.p.A......................... 204.53
Officine Ambrogio Melesi & C. S.r.l./ASFO S.p.A............. 204.53
All Others.................................................. 79.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 733(d)(2) of the Act, we will direct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all
entries of finished
[[Page 9713]]
carbon steel flanges from Italy, as described in the ``Scope of the
Investigation'' in Appendix I, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in
the Federal Register.
Pursuant to section 733(d) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(d), we
will instruct CBP to require cash deposits \6\ equal to the weighted-
average amount by which the normal value exceeds U.S. price, as
indicated in the chart above, as follows: (1) The rate for the
mandatory respondents listed above will be the respondent-specific
rates we determined in this preliminary determination; (2) if the
exporter is not a mandatory respondent identified above, but the
producer is, the rate will be the specific rate established for the
producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the rate for all other
producers or exporters will be the all-others rate. The suspension of
liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, the Department discloses the calculations performed in
connection with a preliminary determination to interested parties
within five days of the date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Because the Department preliminarily
applied total AFA to each of the mandatory respondents in this
investigation, in accordance with section 776 of the Act, there are no
calculations to disclose.
Verification
Because the mandatory respondents in this investigation did not
provide information requested by the Department, the Department will
not conduct verifications of company responses.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on this preliminary
determination no later than 30 days after the date of publication of
the preliminary determination.\7\ Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in case briefs, may be submitted no later than five days after
the deadline date for case briefs.\8\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2)
and (d)(2), parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements). The Department has exercised its
discretion under 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(i) to alter the time limit for
submission of case briefs.
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce,
within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Requests
should contain the party's name, address, and telephone number, the
number of participants, and a list of the issues to be discussed. If a
request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the
hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be determined. Parties
should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing
two days before the scheduled date.
All documents must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An
electronically-filed request must be received successfully in its
entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
Section 735(a)(2) of the Act provides that a final determination
may be postponed until not later than 135 days after the date of the
publication of the preliminary determination if, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination, a request for such postponement
is made by exporters who account for a significant proportion of
exports of the subject merchandise, or in the event of a negative
preliminary determination, a request for such postponement is made by
the petitioner. 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that requests by
respondents for postponement of a final determination be accompanied by
a request for extension of provisional measures from a four-month
period to a period not more than six months in duration.
Respondent Melesi has requested that, in the event of an
affirmative preliminary determination in this investigation, the
Department postpone its final determination until no later than 135
days after the publication of the preliminary determination in the
Federal Register, in accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act.
Melesi also requested the extension of the application of the
provisional measures prescribed under section 733(d) of the Act from a
four-month period to a period not to exceed six months, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.210(e)(2).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Letter from Melesi, regarding ``Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from Italy: Request
to Extend Antidumping Duty Final Determination in the Event of an
Affirmative Preliminary Determination,'' dated January 18, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(2)(ii), because (1) our preliminary determination is
affirmative; (2) the requesting exporter accounts for a significant
proportion of exports of the subject merchandise; and (3) no compelling
reasons for denial exist, we are postponing the final determination
until no later than 135 days after the publication of this notice in
the Federal Register and extending the provisional measures from a
four-month period to a period not greater than six months. Accordingly,
we will issue our final determination no later than 135 days after the
date of publication of this preliminary determination, pursuant to
section 735(a)(2) of the Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2) and (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International Trade Commission Notification
In accordance with section 733(f) of the Act, we are notifying the
International Trade Commission (ITC) of our affirmative preliminary
determination of sales at LTFV. If our final determination is
affirmative, the ITC will determine before the later of 120 days after
the date of this preliminary determination or 45 days after our final
determination whether these imports are materially injuring, or
threaten material injury to, the U.S. industry.This determination is
issued and published in accordance with sections 733(f) and 777(i)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(c).
Dated: January 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers finished carbon steel
flanges. Finished carbon steel flanges differ from unfinished carbon
steel flanges (also known as carbon steel flange forgings) in that
they have undergone further processing after forging, including, but
not limited to, beveling, bore threading, center or step boring,
face machining, taper boring, machining ends or surfaces, drilling
bolt holes, and/or de-
[[Page 9714]]
burring or shot blasting. Any one of these post-forging processes
suffices to render the forging into a finished carbon steel flange
for purposes of this investigation. However, mere heat treatment of
a carbon steel flange forging (without any other further processing
after forging) does not render the forging into a finished carbon
steel flange for purposes of this investigation.
While these finished carbon steel flanges are generally
manufactured to specification ASME B16.5 or ASME B16.47 series A or
series B, the scope is not limited to flanges produced under those
specifications. All types of finished carbon steel flanges are
included in the scope regardless of pipe size (which may or may not
be expressed in inches of nominal pipe size), pressure class
(usually, but not necessarily, expressed in pounds of pressure,
e.g., 150, 300, 400, 600, 900, 1500, 2500, etc.), type of face
(e.g., flat face, full face, raised face, etc.), configuration
(e.g., weld neck, slip on, socket weld, lap joint, threaded, etc.),
wall thickness (usually, but not necessarily, expressed in inches),
normalization, or whether or not heat treated. These carbon steel
flanges either meet or exceed the requirements of the ASTM A105,
ASTM A694, ASTM A181, ASTM A350 and ASTM A707 standards (or
comparable foreign specifications). The scope includes any flanges
produced to the above-referenced ASTM standards as currently stated
or as may be amended. The term ``carbon steel'' under this scope is
steel in which:
(a) iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other
contained elements:
(b) the carbon content is 2 percent or less, by weight; and
(c) none of the elements listed below exceeds the quantity, by
weight, as indicated:
(i) 0.87 percent of aluminum;
(ii) 0.0105 percent of boron;
(iii) 10.10 percent of chromium;
(iv) 1.55 percent of columbium;
(v) 3.10 percent of copper;
(vi) 0.38 percent of lead;
(vii) 3.04 percent of manganese;
(viii) 2.05 percent of molybdenum;
(ix) 20.15 percent of nickel;
(x) 1.55 percent of niobium;
(xi) 0.20 percent of nitrogen;
(xii) 0.21 percent of phosphorus;
(xiii) 3.10 percent of silicon;
(xiv) 0.21 percent of sulfur;
(xv) 1.05 percent of titanium;
(xvi) 4.06 percent of tungsten;
(xvii) 0.53 percent of vanadium; or
(xviii) 0.015 percent of zirconium.
Finished carbon steel flanges are currently classified under
subheadings 7307.91.5010 and 7307.91.5050 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). They may also be entered
under HTSUS subheadings 7307.91.5030 and 7307.91.5070. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; the
written description of the scope is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Period of Investigation
4. Scope of the Investigation
5. Scope Comments
6. Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional
Measures
7. Affiliations and Collapsing of Affiliates
8. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference
9. Calculation of All-Others Rate
10. Verification
11. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2017-02605 Filed 2-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P