Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Terminate the Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation, 9391-9392 [2017-02423]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
9391
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 23 / Monday, February 6, 2017 / Notices
Bureau Form Number: Form ONRR–
4393.
Frequency: Annually and on occasion.
Estimated Number and Description of
Respondents: 120 Federal lessees/
designees and 7 States for Federal oil
and gas.
Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Hour’’ Burden: 10,018
hours.
We have not included in our
estimates certain requirements
performed in the normal course of
business and considered as usual and
customary. We display the estimated
annual burden hours by CFR section
and paragraph in the following chart:
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION COLLECTIONS
Number of
annual
responses
Information collections
Requirement to
respond
Frequency of
response
Annual burden
hours
Annual cost
($51/hr.)
Oil and Gas Valuation (Part 1206 not including Sections 1206.109, 1206.156, and 1206.158(c)(3)
below).
Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation
(Form ONRR–4393) (Sections 1206.109, 1206.156,
and 1206.158(c)(3)).
Accounting and Auditing Relief for Marginal Properties—Industry
(Sections
1204.202(b)(1),
1204.203(b),
1204.205(a)
&
(b),
and
1204.206(a)(3)(i), (b)(1), & 1204.209(b).
Accounting and Auditing Relief for Marginal Properties—States (Section 1204.208(c)(1), (d)(1), &
(e)).
Total .....................................................................
Mandatory ..........
On occasion .......
114
8,396
$428,196
Required to obtain a benefit.
On occasion .......
19
1,096
55,896
Required to obtain a benefit.
Annually .............
3
246
12,546
Required to obtain a benefit.
Annually .............
7
280
14,280
............................
............................
143
10,018
$510,918
Note: Audit Process—The Office of Regulatory Affairs determined that the audit process is exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
because ONRR staff asks non-standard questions to resolve exceptions.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
This 30-day Federal Register notice
burden chart shows an adjustment
increase of +820 burden hours. This
adjustment is based on analyzed
historical data since the last renewal for
1206.153(g), 1206.156(c)(3),
1206.157(a)(1)(i), 1206.157(b)(1),
1206.158(c)(3), 1206.159(a)(1)(i), and
1206.159(b)(1); this also includes
addressing industry’s comments.
Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-hour’’ Cost
Burden: We have identified no ‘‘nonhour’’ cost burden associated with the
collection of information.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person does not have to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
III. Request for Comments
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA
requires each agency to ‘‘* * * provide
60-day notice in the Federal Register
* * * and otherwise consult with
members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *.’’
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to (a) evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information that ONRR collects; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public
consultation process, we published a
notice in the Federal Register on June
6, 2016 (81 FR 36325), announcing that
we would submit this ICR to OMB for
approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. We
received no unsolicited comments in
response to the notice.
If you wish to comment in response
to this notice, you may send your
comments to the offices listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. OMB
has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collection,
but they may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, in order to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
public comments by March 6, 2017.
Public Comment Policy: We will post
all comments, including names and
addresses of respondents at https://
www.regulations.gov. Before including
Personally Identifiable Information (PII),
such as your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
information in your comment(s), you
should be aware that your entire
comment (including PII) may be made
available to the public at any time.
While you may ask us, in your
comment, to withhold PII from public
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
view, we cannot guarantee that we will
be able to do so. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget control number.
Dated: January 31, 2017.
Gregory J. Gould,
Director, Office of Natural Resources
Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2017–02356 Filed 2–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4335–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–973]
Certain Wearable Activity Tracking
Devices, Systems, and Components
Thereof; Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting Complainant’s Unopposed
Motion To Terminate the Investigation
in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal
of the Complaint; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 27) of the presiding
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
9392
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 23 / Monday, February 6, 2017 / Notices
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’)
granting an unopposed motion to
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based upon withdrawal of the
complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3042. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted Inv. No. 337–
TA–973 on December 7, 2015, based on
a complaint filed by Fitbit, Inc. of San
Francisco, California (‘‘Fitbit’’). 80 FR
76040 (Dec. 7, 2015). The complaint
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain wearable
activity tracking devices, systems, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,920,332 (‘‘the ’332 patent);
U.S. Patent No. 8,868,377 (‘‘the ’377
patent); and U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760
(‘‘the ’760 patent’’). The notice of
investigation named the following
respondents: AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone
of San Francisco, California and
BodyMedia, Inc. of Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania (collectively, ‘‘Jawbone’’).
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (OUII) is a party to the
investigation.
On July 19, 2016, the ALJ issued
Order No. 24 granting a motion for
summary determination that the ’332
patent, the ’377 patent, and the ’760
patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101
for being directed to ineligible subject
matter, and terminated the investigation
in its entirety. On August 1, 2016, Fitbit
petitioned for review of the ID. On
August 8, 2016, Jawbone and OUII filed
oppositions to Fitbit’s petition. On
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
September 7, 2016, the Commission
determined to review the ID, and on
review, vacated and remanded for the
ALJ to continue the investigation as to
the ’332 patent and the ’377 patent.
On December 23, 2016, Fitbit moved
unopposed to terminate the
investigation in its entirety based upon
withdrawal of the complaint. Fitbit
indicated that Jawbone and OUII do not
oppose the motion.
On January 3, 2017, the ALJ issued
the subject ID (Order No. 27), granting
the unopposed motion. The ALJ found
that the motion complied with the
requirements of Commission Rule
210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and
further found that no extraordinary
circumstances prohibited granting the
motion. None of the parties petitioned
for review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID. This terminates the
investigation.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
instituted these reviews on August 1,
2016 (81 FR 50544) and determined on
November 4, 2016 that it would conduct
expedited reviews (81 FR 87587,
December 5, 2016).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on January 31, 2017.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4668
(January 2017), entitled Polyester Staple
Fiber from Korea and Taiwan:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–825–826
(Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 31, 2017.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2017–02362 Filed 2–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1124–0004]
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 1, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Extension
With Change, of a Previously
Approved Collection; Exhibit B to
Registration Statement of Foreign
Agents (NSD–4)
[FR Doc. 2017–02423 Filed 2–3–17; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–825–826 (Third
Review)]
Polyester Staple Fiber From Korea and
Taiwan
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on polyester
staple fiber from Korea and Taiwan
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Foreign Agents Registration Act
(FARA) Unit, Counterintelligence and
Export Control Section (CES), National
Security Division (NSD), U.S.
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Foreign Agents Registration Act
(FARA) Unit, Counterintelligence and
Export Control Section (CES), National
Security Division (NSD), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until April
7, 2017. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 23 (Monday, February 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9391-9392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02423]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-973]
Certain Wearable Activity Tracking Devices, Systems, and
Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Complainant's Unopposed Motion To Terminate the
Investigation in Its Entirety Based Upon Withdrawal of the Complaint;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 27) of the presiding
[[Page 9392]]
administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting an unopposed motion to
terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of
the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
973 on December 7, 2015, based on a complaint filed by Fitbit, Inc. of
San Francisco, California (``Fitbit''). 80 FR 76040 (Dec. 7, 2015). The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain wearable activity tracking devices, systems, and
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,920,332 (``the '332 patent); U.S. Patent No. 8,868,377
(``the '377 patent); and U.S. Patent No. 9,089,760 (``the '760
patent''). The notice of investigation named the following respondents:
AliphCom d/b/a Jawbone of San Francisco, California and BodyMedia, Inc.
of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (collectively, ``Jawbone''). The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) is a party to the investigation.
On July 19, 2016, the ALJ issued Order No. 24 granting a motion for
summary determination that the '332 patent, the '377 patent, and the
'760 patent are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101 for being directed to
ineligible subject matter, and terminated the investigation in its
entirety. On August 1, 2016, Fitbit petitioned for review of the ID. On
August 8, 2016, Jawbone and OUII filed oppositions to Fitbit's
petition. On September 7, 2016, the Commission determined to review the
ID, and on review, vacated and remanded for the ALJ to continue the
investigation as to the '332 patent and the '377 patent.
On December 23, 2016, Fitbit moved unopposed to terminate the
investigation in its entirety based upon withdrawal of the complaint.
Fitbit indicated that Jawbone and OUII do not oppose the motion.
On January 3, 2017, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 27),
granting the unopposed motion. The ALJ found that the motion complied
with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR
210.21(a)(1)) and further found that no extraordinary circumstances
prohibited granting the motion. None of the parties petitioned for
review of the ID.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID. This terminates
the investigation.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 1, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-02423 Filed 2-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
