Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Reflect Updates to the Consolidated Trade Summary, Eliminate Re-Pricing in the Foreign Security Accounting Operation and Make Other Changes, 9448-9450 [2017-02372]
Download as PDF
9448
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 23 / Monday, February 6, 2017 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.36
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–02379 Filed 2–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79904; File No. SR–NSCC–
2016–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Approval
of Proposed Rule Change To Reflect
Updates to the Consolidated Trade
Summary, Eliminate Re-Pricing in the
Foreign Security Accounting Operation
and Make Other Changes
January 31, 2017.
On December 15, 2016, National
Securities Clearing Corporation
(‘‘NSCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
proposed rule change SR–NSCC–2016–
008, pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder.2
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 29, 2016.3 The
Commission did not receive any
comment letters on the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is granting
approval of the proposed rule change.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The proposed rule change consists of
amendments to NSCC’s Rules &
Procedures (‘‘Rules’’) 4 in order to (1)
consolidate the file layouts into one
common file layout, (2) provide more
details in the revised Consolidated
Trade Summary (‘‘CTSs’’), (3)
discontinue a current output format
(print image) and introduce a more userfriendly format (referred to as comma
separated value or ‘‘CSV’’) and an
online query tool, (4) simplify the
terminology in the Rules by referring to
each iteration of the CTS as the
‘‘Consolidated Trade Summary’’
(instead of the way in which the Rules
are currently drafted to refer to a
36 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79655
(December 22, 2016), 81 FR 96146 (December 29,
2016) (SR–NSCC–2016–008) (‘‘Notice’’).
4 Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined
in the Rules, available at https://dtcc.com/∼/media/
Files/Downloads/legal/rules/nscc_rules.pdf.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
‘‘Consolidated Trade Summary’’ and a
‘‘Supplemental Consolidated Trade
Summary’’), and (5) discontinue the
Foreign Securities transaction file
because information contained in that
additional file would be reflected in the
revised CTSs, each of which is
described below.
A. Changes to the CTS and Technical
Changes to the CTS-Related Rules
First, the proposed rule change would
consolidate the file layouts of the
current CTSs into one common file
layout that would be used for each of
the three CTSs that are issued each day.
Currently, each of the main CTS file, the
supplemental CTS file, and the Foreign
Securities file has its own individual
file layout. NSCC would consolidate
these multiple file layouts into one
common file layout in the revised CTS
file. Having one common layout in the
revised CTS would eliminate the need
for Members to maintain coding for
multiple file layouts.
Second, the proposal would update
the CTS output file layout to provide
Members with additional transparency
and clarity regarding their trade
summary, balance orders and receive
and deliver instructions, which would
help with reconciliation. For example,
the current CTS output file layout
specifies if a security is a CNS security
or a non-CNS security but does not
further clarify the non-CNS obligations
as guaranteed or not guaranteed. Under
the proposal, the CTS output file layout
would be expanded to include a field
for the guarantee/not guarantee
designation to clearly indicate to users
whether a trade obligation is guaranteed
or not guaranteed. Other examples of
new fields that would be added include:
(1) Netting type to describe whether
netted (e.g., multilaterally netted or
bilaterally netted) or trade-for-trade
instructions resulted, and (2) a net
reason code to add clarity as to the
netting type.
Third, Members have also expressed
interest in having NSCC change the
current file format of the CTSs, which
are currently available in print image
format and machine-readable (‘‘MRO’’)
format. As a result, NSCC would
discontinue the current print image
format while maintaining the current
MRO format and would also introduce
an online query tool. The print image
format would be replaced by CSV which
can be downloaded into spreadsheet
programs. In addition to the three
iterations of the CTS that would
continue to be distributed to Members,
Members would also be able to use a
new online query tool to search
information and create their own
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
custom data view and custom reports.
The new online query tool would enable
users to research information that has
been previously distributed in a CTS.
Members have expressed interest in this
change in file formats and the online
query tool which allows results to be
downloaded to spreadsheet programs.
Fourth, from a Rules perspective, the
terminology in Procedure II, Section H,
Procedure V, Section E and Procedure
VII, Section B would be revised, so that
each CTS would be referred to as the
‘‘Consolidated Trade Summary’’ and
more than one CTS would be referred to
as the ‘‘Consolidated Trade
Summaries.’’ The proposed rule change
would eliminate references to alternate
terminology such as ‘‘Supplemental
Consolidated Trade Summary,’’
‘‘Supplemental Consolidated Trade
Summaries,’’ and ‘‘CTS.’’ In addition,
conforming changes would be made to
Procedure V, Section C and Procedure
VII, Section B to add phrases and terms
such as ‘‘next available,’’ ‘‘applicable’’
and ‘‘prior’’ before references to
‘‘Consolidated Trade Summary.’’
Additional technical changes would be
made to clarify that the CTS would
continue to be issued to Members three
times a day and would continue to be
non-cumulative; these changes would
apply to Procedure II, Section H,
Procedure V, Section E and Procedure
VII, Section B. Procedure VII, Section B
would also be amended to reflect the
change in output format of the
Consolidated Trade Summaries
(specifically, because the print image
format is being discontinued and the
CSV format is being introduced, the
Rules and terminology must be changed
to use terminology consistent with the
different format).
Fifth, the Foreign Securities
transaction file would be discontinued.
Information that is currently in this
additional file would be reflected in the
revised CTSs.
NSCC would continue to issue the
CTSs to Members three times a day, at
approximately the same intervals as it
does today.5 The revised CTSs would
continue to be iterative (i.e., any
information that appeared on prior CTSs
would not appear again on any
successive CTSs), and also continue to
be available in MRO format.
5 The header of the CTS output file would
indicate whether the CTS is for Cycle 1 (i.e., the one
issued at approximately 21:00 ET), Cycle 2 (i.e., the
one issued at approximately 24:00 ET) or Cycle 3
(i.e., the one issued at approximately 12:00 ET on
the next business day).
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 23 / Monday, February 6, 2017 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
B. Discontinuation of the Re-Pricing of
Foreign Securities and Technical
Clarifications/Corrections to Procedure
VI (Foreign Security Accounting
Operation)
Based on Member feedback, NSCC is
also proposing to update the code
associated with NSCC’s Foreign
Security Accounting Operation, which
receives and processes Foreign
Securities traded over-the-counter and
settled in U.S. Dollars.6 The current
foreign netting process aggregates
Foreign Securities obligations,
bilaterally nets these obligations and
then re-prices these obligations using a
uniform Settlement Price. As further
explained below, NSCC is proposing to
no longer re-price these Foreign
Securities obligations.
Foreign Securities would continue to
be bilaterally netted, but would no
longer be re-priced at uniform
Settlement Prices. Instead, they would
be bilaterally netted at their contract
prices to eliminate the risk of a cash
adjustment (which is not guaranteed by
NSCC) due to re-pricing.
To effectuate this proposed change,
NSCC proposes to remove language in
Procedure VI, Section C that permits
NSCC to establish a uniform Settlement
Price and calculate any related Foreign
Security Clearance Cash Adjustment
associated with the re-pricing. Unlike
the underlying Foreign Securities
transactions (which are settled in the
local markets and not at NSCC), the
payments of any Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment (whether
due to netting or re-pricing) related to
those underlying Foreign Securities
transactions are made through NSCC
today and under the proposed rule
change, this would continue to be the
case with respect to Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustments that arise
due to netting. The proposed rule
change would revise the language in
Procedure VI to clearly state that the
failure of a Member to make payment of
the Foreign Security Clearance Cash
Adjustment with NSCC will cause
NSCC to reverse all such cash
adjustment debits and credits (rather
than generally stating this would be
caused by the failure to ‘‘make
settlement with the Corporation’’). The
proposed rule change would further
clarify that neither the settlement of the
underlying transaction nor the payment
of the related Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment would be
6 See Procedure VI (Foreign Security Accounting
Operation).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Feb 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
guaranteed by NSCC (which is also the
case today).7
Additional clarifying changes to
Procedure VI include revising the
reference from ‘‘T+2’’ in Section B to
‘‘SD–1’’ because Foreign Securities
transactions are not always settled on
T+3 (according to local market
practices) and thus, are not always
compared on T+2, as Section B of
Procedure VI states. Therefore, using
Settlement Date (i.e., ‘‘SD’’) as the
reference point is more appropriate.
Furthermore, Foreign Securities
transactions are reported on the CTSs,
which are Settlement Date-based. In
addition, in Section C, ‘‘produced’’
would be revised to ‘‘reported,’’ because
‘‘reported’’ more accurately describes
what occurs today—that is, NSCC
reports the netted Member-to-Member
receive and deliver instructions. In
addition, the proposed rule change
would make the following corrections:
(i) The reference in Section C to
‘‘Foreign Security Clearing Cash
Adjustment’’ would be revised to the
correct term, ‘‘Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment’’ and (ii) the
cross-references to ‘‘Section II’’ and
‘‘Section IV’’ in Section A would be
replaced with references to ‘‘Procedure
II’’ and ‘‘Procedure IV,’’ respectively.
C. Implementation Timeframe
These proposed rule changes would
become effective by July 14, 2017. After
Commission approval of these proposed
rule changes, a legend would be added
to each of Procedures II, V, VI and VII
stating that there are approved but not
yet operative changes to the respective
Procedure and specifying the applicable
section or sections that would be
amended by the proposed rule change.
The legend would state that such
changes would be operative by July 14,
2017, but if such changes become
operative before July 14, 2017, NSCC
would notify Members by Important
Notice 30 days before the actual
implementation date. The legend would
also state that underlined and boldface
text indicates new text and
strikethrough and boldface text
indicates deleted text. Additionally, the
legend would include a reference to the
file number of the proposed rule change
and would state that once operative, the
legend would automatically be removed
from the Rules, and the formatting of the
text of the changes in the applicable
section or sections would automatically
7 Under the proposed rule change, only a Foreign
Security Clearance Cash Adjustment due to repricing would be eliminated. A Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment due to netting is still
possible, so this Procedure is still applicable to
such Foreign Security Clearance Cash Adjustments.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9449
be revised to reflect that these changes
have become operative.
II. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 8 directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if it finds that such
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
such organization. The Commission
believes the proposal is consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act
requires, in part, that NSCC’s Rules be
designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and to protect
investors and the public interest.9 The
Commission believes that the proposed
rule changes are consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
NSCC, in particular Section
17(A)(b)(3)(F), because the proposed
rule changes promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions.10
Specifically, by updating the CTS to
provide more details and information in
one common file layout, the proposal
would provide Members with more
transparency and clarity regarding their
trade obligations, which could help
Members better understand their
reconciliation of trades for settlement.
Furthermore, Members would receive
the CTS in a more user-friendly format
(i.e., CSV). With the new online query
tool, Members would also be able to
access trade obligation information that
has been distributed in prior CTSs and
customize searches of trade obligation
information according to their needs.
Therefore, the Commission believes that
these changes to the CTS would make
it a more effective tool for Members to
help manage their settlement
obligations, thus promoting the prompt
and accurate clearance of securities
transactions.
Additionally, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule changes
associated with the Foreign Security
Accounting Operation are designed to
protect investors and the public
interest.11 Specifically, the proposed
rule change would address the timing
mismatch between the receipt of the
CTS by Members and the settlement of
Foreign Securities trades in the local
markets by Members by discontinuing
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
10 Id.
11 Id.
9 15
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
9450
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 23 / Monday, February 6, 2017 / Notices
the practice of re-pricing Foreign
Securities at the uniform Settlement
Prices. This change also would
eliminate Member exposure from a cash
adjustment due to re-pricing and the
associated risk that a solvent Member
could be liable for the cash adjustment
if its counterparty defaults because the
cash adjustment is not guaranteed by
NSCC. Therefore, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule change
promotes investor protection and the
public interest.12
As the proposed rule change pertains
to technical changes to the Rules, the
Commission finds the technical changes
also consistent with Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 13 because the
technical updates are designed to make
the Rules more clear, consistent, and
current for Members that rely on them.
Therefore, the proposed technical
changes help support NSCC’s prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions made by
Members.
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposals are
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act 14 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that
proposed rule change SR–NSCC–2016–
008 be, and hereby is, approved.15
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–02372 Filed 2–3–17; 8:45 am]
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–79908; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2017–04]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Adopt the Rule
6.6800 Series To Implement the
Compliance Rule Regarding the
National Market System Plan
Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail
January 31, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on January
17, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. On January 30,
2017, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change,
which amended and replaced the
proposed rule change in its entirety. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposed rule change
to adopt the Rule 6.6800 Series to
implement the compliance rule
(‘‘Compliance Rule’’) regarding the
National Market System Plan Governing
the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ‘‘CAT
NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’).4 The proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
12 Id.
13 Id.
14 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposals’ impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
16 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
15 In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
16:03 Feb 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms
used in this rule filing are defined as set forth
herein or in the CAT NMS Plan.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
This Amendment No. 1 amends and
replaces in its entirety the original
proposal filed by the Exchange on
January 17, 2017. The Exchange submits
this Amendment No. 1 in order to
clarify certain points and add additional
details to the Compliance Rule as
proposed herein.
Bats BYX Exchange, Inc., Bats BZX
Exchange, Inc., Bats EDGA Exchange,
Inc., Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc., BOX
Options Exchange LLC, C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated, Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated,
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.,
International Securities Exchange, LLC,
Investors’ Exchange LLC, ISE Gemini,
LLC, ISE Mercury, LLC, Miami
International Securities Exchange LLC,
MIAX PEARL, LLC, NASDAQ BX, Inc.,
NASDAQ PHLX LLC, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC, National Stock
Exchange, Inc., New York Stock
Exchange LLC, NYSE MKT LLC, and
NYSE Arca, Inc. (collectively, the
‘‘Participants’’) filed with the
Commission, pursuant to Section 11A of
the Exchange Act 5 and Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS thereunder,6 the CAT
NMS Plan.7 The Participants filed the
Plan to comply with Rule 613 of
Regulation NMS under the Exchange
Act. The Plan was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
May 17, 2016,8 and approved by the
Commission, as modified, on November
15, 2016.9
The Plan is designed to create,
implement and maintain a consolidated
audit trail (‘‘CAT’’) that would capture
customer and order event information
5 15
U.S.C. 78k–1.
CFR 242.608.
7 See Letter from the Participants to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Commission, dated September 30,
2014; and Letter from Participants to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, dated February 27, 2015.
On December 24, 2015, the Participants submitted
an amendment to the CAT NMS Plan. See Letter
from Participants to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated December 23, 2015.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77724
(April 27, 2016), 81 FR 30614 (May 17, 2016).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318
(November 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696 (November 23,
2016) (‘‘Order Approving the National Market
System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit
Trail) (‘‘Approval Order’’).
6 17
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 23 (Monday, February 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9448-9450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02372]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-79904; File No. SR-NSCC-2016-008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Reflect
Updates to the Consolidated Trade Summary, Eliminate Re-Pricing in the
Foreign Security Accounting Operation and Make Other Changes
January 31, 2017.
On December 15, 2016, National Securities Clearing Corporation
(``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2016-008, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on December 29, 2016.\3\ The
Commission did not receive any comment letters on the proposed rule
change. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is granting
approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79655 (December 22,
2016), 81 FR 96146 (December 29, 2016) (SR-NSCC-2016-008)
(``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of amendments to NSCC's Rules &
Procedures (``Rules'') \4\ in order to (1) consolidate the file layouts
into one common file layout, (2) provide more details in the revised
Consolidated Trade Summary (``CTSs''), (3) discontinue a current output
format (print image) and introduce a more user-friendly format
(referred to as comma separated value or ``CSV'') and an online query
tool, (4) simplify the terminology in the Rules by referring to each
iteration of the CTS as the ``Consolidated Trade Summary'' (instead of
the way in which the Rules are currently drafted to refer to a
``Consolidated Trade Summary'' and a ``Supplemental Consolidated Trade
Summary''), and (5) discontinue the Foreign Securities transaction file
because information contained in that additional file would be
reflected in the revised CTSs, each of which is described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the
Rules, available at https://dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/
rules/nscc_rules.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Changes to the CTS and Technical Changes to the CTS-Related Rules
First, the proposed rule change would consolidate the file layouts
of the current CTSs into one common file layout that would be used for
each of the three CTSs that are issued each day. Currently, each of the
main CTS file, the supplemental CTS file, and the Foreign Securities
file has its own individual file layout. NSCC would consolidate these
multiple file layouts into one common file layout in the revised CTS
file. Having one common layout in the revised CTS would eliminate the
need for Members to maintain coding for multiple file layouts.
Second, the proposal would update the CTS output file layout to
provide Members with additional transparency and clarity regarding
their trade summary, balance orders and receive and deliver
instructions, which would help with reconciliation. For example, the
current CTS output file layout specifies if a security is a CNS
security or a non-CNS security but does not further clarify the non-CNS
obligations as guaranteed or not guaranteed. Under the proposal, the
CTS output file layout would be expanded to include a field for the
guarantee/not guarantee designation to clearly indicate to users
whether a trade obligation is guaranteed or not guaranteed. Other
examples of new fields that would be added include: (1) Netting type to
describe whether netted (e.g., multilaterally netted or bilaterally
netted) or trade-for-trade instructions resulted, and (2) a net reason
code to add clarity as to the netting type.
Third, Members have also expressed interest in having NSCC change
the current file format of the CTSs, which are currently available in
print image format and machine-readable (``MRO'') format. As a result,
NSCC would discontinue the current print image format while maintaining
the current MRO format and would also introduce an online query tool.
The print image format would be replaced by CSV which can be downloaded
into spreadsheet programs. In addition to the three iterations of the
CTS that would continue to be distributed to Members, Members would
also be able to use a new online query tool to search information and
create their own custom data view and custom reports. The new online
query tool would enable users to research information that has been
previously distributed in a CTS. Members have expressed interest in
this change in file formats and the online query tool which allows
results to be downloaded to spreadsheet programs.
Fourth, from a Rules perspective, the terminology in Procedure II,
Section H, Procedure V, Section E and Procedure VII, Section B would be
revised, so that each CTS would be referred to as the ``Consolidated
Trade Summary'' and more than one CTS would be referred to as the
``Consolidated Trade Summaries.'' The proposed rule change would
eliminate references to alternate terminology such as ``Supplemental
Consolidated Trade Summary,'' ``Supplemental Consolidated Trade
Summaries,'' and ``CTS.'' In addition, conforming changes would be made
to Procedure V, Section C and Procedure VII, Section B to add phrases
and terms such as ``next available,'' ``applicable'' and ``prior''
before references to ``Consolidated Trade Summary.'' Additional
technical changes would be made to clarify that the CTS would continue
to be issued to Members three times a day and would continue to be non-
cumulative; these changes would apply to Procedure II, Section H,
Procedure V, Section E and Procedure VII, Section B. Procedure VII,
Section B would also be amended to reflect the change in output format
of the Consolidated Trade Summaries (specifically, because the print
image format is being discontinued and the CSV format is being
introduced, the Rules and terminology must be changed to use
terminology consistent with the different format).
Fifth, the Foreign Securities transaction file would be
discontinued. Information that is currently in this additional file
would be reflected in the revised CTSs.
NSCC would continue to issue the CTSs to Members three times a day,
at approximately the same intervals as it does today.\5\ The revised
CTSs would continue to be iterative (i.e., any information that
appeared on prior CTSs would not appear again on any successive CTSs),
and also continue to be available in MRO format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The header of the CTS output file would indicate whether the
CTS is for Cycle 1 (i.e., the one issued at approximately 21:00 ET),
Cycle 2 (i.e., the one issued at approximately 24:00 ET) or Cycle 3
(i.e., the one issued at approximately 12:00 ET on the next business
day).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9449]]
B. Discontinuation of the Re-Pricing of Foreign Securities and
Technical Clarifications/Corrections to Procedure VI (Foreign Security
Accounting Operation)
Based on Member feedback, NSCC is also proposing to update the code
associated with NSCC's Foreign Security Accounting Operation, which
receives and processes Foreign Securities traded over-the-counter and
settled in U.S. Dollars.\6\ The current foreign netting process
aggregates Foreign Securities obligations, bilaterally nets these
obligations and then re-prices these obligations using a uniform
Settlement Price. As further explained below, NSCC is proposing to no
longer re-price these Foreign Securities obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Procedure VI (Foreign Security Accounting Operation).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Foreign Securities would continue to be bilaterally netted, but
would no longer be re-priced at uniform Settlement Prices. Instead,
they would be bilaterally netted at their contract prices to eliminate
the risk of a cash adjustment (which is not guaranteed by NSCC) due to
re-pricing.
To effectuate this proposed change, NSCC proposes to remove
language in Procedure VI, Section C that permits NSCC to establish a
uniform Settlement Price and calculate any related Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment associated with the re-pricing. Unlike the
underlying Foreign Securities transactions (which are settled in the
local markets and not at NSCC), the payments of any Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment (whether due to netting or re-pricing)
related to those underlying Foreign Securities transactions are made
through NSCC today and under the proposed rule change, this would
continue to be the case with respect to Foreign Security Clearance Cash
Adjustments that arise due to netting. The proposed rule change would
revise the language in Procedure VI to clearly state that the failure
of a Member to make payment of the Foreign Security Clearance Cash
Adjustment with NSCC will cause NSCC to reverse all such cash
adjustment debits and credits (rather than generally stating this would
be caused by the failure to ``make settlement with the Corporation'').
The proposed rule change would further clarify that neither the
settlement of the underlying transaction nor the payment of the related
Foreign Security Clearance Cash Adjustment would be guaranteed by NSCC
(which is also the case today).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Under the proposed rule change, only a Foreign Security
Clearance Cash Adjustment due to re-pricing would be eliminated. A
Foreign Security Clearance Cash Adjustment due to netting is still
possible, so this Procedure is still applicable to such Foreign
Security Clearance Cash Adjustments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional clarifying changes to Procedure VI include revising the
reference from ``T+2'' in Section B to ``SD-1'' because Foreign
Securities transactions are not always settled on T+3 (according to
local market practices) and thus, are not always compared on T+2, as
Section B of Procedure VI states. Therefore, using Settlement Date
(i.e., ``SD'') as the reference point is more appropriate. Furthermore,
Foreign Securities transactions are reported on the CTSs, which are
Settlement Date-based. In addition, in Section C, ``produced'' would be
revised to ``reported,'' because ``reported'' more accurately describes
what occurs today--that is, NSCC reports the netted Member-to-Member
receive and deliver instructions. In addition, the proposed rule change
would make the following corrections: (i) The reference in Section C to
``Foreign Security Clearing Cash Adjustment'' would be revised to the
correct term, ``Foreign Security Clearance Cash Adjustment'' and (ii)
the cross-references to ``Section II'' and ``Section IV'' in Section A
would be replaced with references to ``Procedure II'' and ``Procedure
IV,'' respectively.
C. Implementation Timeframe
These proposed rule changes would become effective by July 14,
2017. After Commission approval of these proposed rule changes, a
legend would be added to each of Procedures II, V, VI and VII stating
that there are approved but not yet operative changes to the respective
Procedure and specifying the applicable section or sections that would
be amended by the proposed rule change. The legend would state that
such changes would be operative by July 14, 2017, but if such changes
become operative before July 14, 2017, NSCC would notify Members by
Important Notice 30 days before the actual implementation date. The
legend would also state that underlined and boldface text indicates new
text and strikethrough and boldface text indicates deleted text.
Additionally, the legend would include a reference to the file number
of the proposed rule change and would state that once operative, the
legend would automatically be removed from the Rules, and the
formatting of the text of the changes in the applicable section or
sections would automatically be revised to reflect that these changes
have become operative.
II. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \8\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it
finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and rules and regulations thereunder applicable
to such organization. The Commission believes the proposal is
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, in part, that NSCC's
Rules be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and to protect investors and the
public interest.\9\ The Commission believes that the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to NSCC, in particular Section
17(A)(b)(3)(F), because the proposed rule changes promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, by updating the CTS to provide more details and
information in one common file layout, the proposal would provide
Members with more transparency and clarity regarding their trade
obligations, which could help Members better understand their
reconciliation of trades for settlement. Furthermore, Members would
receive the CTS in a more user-friendly format (i.e., CSV). With the
new online query tool, Members would also be able to access trade
obligation information that has been distributed in prior CTSs and
customize searches of trade obligation information according to their
needs. Therefore, the Commission believes that these changes to the CTS
would make it a more effective tool for Members to help manage their
settlement obligations, thus promoting the prompt and accurate
clearance of securities transactions.
Additionally, the Commission believes that the proposed rule
changes associated with the Foreign Security Accounting Operation are
designed to protect investors and the public interest.\11\
Specifically, the proposed rule change would address the timing
mismatch between the receipt of the CTS by Members and the settlement
of Foreign Securities trades in the local markets by Members by
discontinuing
[[Page 9450]]
the practice of re-pricing Foreign Securities at the uniform Settlement
Prices. This change also would eliminate Member exposure from a cash
adjustment due to re-pricing and the associated risk that a solvent
Member could be liable for the cash adjustment if its counterparty
defaults because the cash adjustment is not guaranteed by NSCC.
Therefore, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change
promotes investor protection and the public interest.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Id.
\12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the proposed rule change pertains to technical changes to the
Rules, the Commission finds the technical changes also consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \13\ because the technical updates are
designed to make the Rules more clear, consistent, and current for
Members that rely on them. Therefore, the proposed technical changes
help support NSCC's prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions made by Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposals are consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \14\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that proposed rule change SR-NSCC-2016-008 be, and hereby is,
approved.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposals' impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-02372 Filed 2-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P