Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People's Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination, 8605-8606 [2017-01860]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
later than 45 days after our final
determination. If the ITC determines
that such injury does not exist, this
proceeding will be terminated and all
securities posted will be refunded or
canceled. If the ITC determines that
such injury does exist, the Department
will issue an antidumping duty order
directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by the Department,
antidumping duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective
date of the suspension of liquidation.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice will serve as a reminder
to the parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of propriety information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of return or destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with sections
735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: January 19, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation covers truck
and bus tires. Truck and bus tires are new
pneumatic tires, of rubber, with a truck or
bus size designation. Truck and bus tires
covered by this investigation may be tubetype, tubeless, radial, or non-radial.
Subject tires have, at the time of
importation, the symbol ‘‘DOT’’ on the
sidewall, certifying that the tire conforms to
applicable motor vehicle safety standards.
Subject tires may also have one of the
following suffixes in their tire size
designation, which also appear on the
sidewall of the tire:
TR—Identifies tires for service on trucks or
buses to differentiate them from similarly
sized passenger car and light truck tires; and
HC—Identifies a 17.5 inch rim diameter
code for use on low platform trailers.
All tires with a ‘‘TR’’ or ‘‘HC’’ suffix in
their size designations are covered by this
investigation regardless of their intended use.
In addition, all tires that lack one of the
above suffix markings are included in the
scope, regardless of their intended use, as
long as the tire is of a size that is among the
numerical size designations listed in the
‘‘Truck-Bus’’ section of the Tire and Rim
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Association Year Book, as updated annually,
unless the tire falls within one of the specific
exclusions set out below.
Truck and bus tires, whether or not
mounted on wheels or rims, are included in
the scope. However, if a subject tire is
imported mounted on a wheel or rim, only
the tire is covered by the scope. Subject
merchandise includes truck and bus tires
produced in the subject country whether
mounted on wheels or rims in the subject
country or in a third country. Truck and bus
tires are covered whether or not they are
accompanied by other parts, e.g., a wheel,
rim, axle parts, bolts, nuts, etc. Truck and bus
tires that enter attached to a vehicle are not
covered by the scope.
Specifically excluded from the scope of
this investigation are the following types of
tires: (1) Pneumatic tires, of rubber, that are
not new, including recycled and retreaded
tires; (2) non-pneumatic tires, such as solid
rubber tires; and (3) tires that exhibit each of
the following physical characteristics: (a) The
designation ‘‘MH’’ is molded into the tire’s
sidewall as part of the size designation; (b)
the tire incorporates a warning, prominently
molded on the sidewall, that the tire is for
‘‘Mobile Home Use Only;’’ and (c) the tire is
of bias construction as evidenced by the fact
that the construction code included in the
size designation molded into the tire’s
sidewall is not the letter ‘‘R.’’
The subject merchandise is currently
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings: 4011.20.1015 and
4011.20.5020. Tires meeting the scope
description may also enter under the
following HTSUS subheadings:
4011.69.0020, 4011.69.0090, 4011.70.00,
4011.90.80, 4011.99.4520, 4011.99.4590,
4011.99.8520, 4011.99.8590, 8708.70.4530,
8708.70.6030, 8708.70.6060, and
8716.90.5059.14
While HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and for customs purposes,
the written description of the subject
merchandise is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Company Abbreviations
IV. Other Abbreviations
V. Period of Investigation
VI. Scope Comments
VII. Scope of the Investigation
VIII. Critical Circumstances
IX. Surrogate Country
14 On August 26, 2016, the Department included
HTSUS subheadings 4011.69.0020, 4011.69.0090,
and 8716.90.5059 to the case reference files,
pursuant to requests by CBP and the petitioner. See
Memorandum to the File entitled, ‘‘Requests from
Customs and Border Protection and the Petitioner
to Update the ACE Case Reference File,’’ dated
August 26, 2016. On January 19, 2017, the
Department included HTSUS subheadings
4011.70.00 and 4011.90.80 to the case reference
files, pursuant to requests by CBP. See
Memorandum to the File entitled, ‘‘Requests from
Customs and Border Protection to Update the ACE
Case Reference File,’’ dated January 19, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8605
X. Separate Rates
XI. PRC-Wide Rate
XII. Margin Calculations
XIII. Discussion of the Issues
a. Separate Rate Eligibility Issues
b. Combination Rates
c. PCT Issues
d. Preliminary Cash Deposit Rates
e. Critical Circumstances
f. Scope Issues
XIV. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2017–01861 Filed 1–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–052]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Hardwood Plywood Products
From the People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective January 27, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin Neuman at (202) 482–0486, or
Matthew Renkey at (202) 482–2312, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On December 8, 2016, the Department
of Commerce (Department) initiated the
countervailing duty investigation of
certain hardwood plywood products
(hardwood plywood) from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC).1 Currently, the
preliminary determination is due no
later than February 13, 2017.2
Postponement of Due Date for the
Preliminary Determination
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (Act), requires the
Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a countervailing duty
investigation within 65 days after the
date on which the Department initiated
the investigation. However, in
1 See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 FR 91131
(December 16, 2016) (Initiation).
2 The due date actually falls on February 11,
2017, which is a Saturday. Therefore, the deadline
moves to the next business day, February 13, 2017.
See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next
Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2008).
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
8606
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(e),
section 703(c)(1) of the Act permits the
Department to postpone the preliminary
determination until no later than 130
days after the date on which the
Department initiated the investigation
if, among other reasons, Petitioners 3
make a timely request for a
postponement, or the Department
concludes that the parties concerned are
cooperating and determines that the
investigation is extraordinarily
complicated. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e),
petitioners must submit a request for
postponement 25 days or more before
the scheduled date of the preliminary
determination and must state the reason
for the request. The Department will
grant the request unless it finds
compelling reasons to deny the request.4
In the instant investigation,
Petitioners made a timely request, on
January 17, 2017, that we postpone the
preliminary CVD determination.5 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(e),
Petitioner has stated the reason for
requesting a postponement of the
preliminary determination, and the
Department finds no compelling reason
to deny the request. Therefore, pursuant
to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, we are
extending the due date for the
preliminary determination to no later
than 130 days after the date on which
this investigation was initiated, i.e., to
April 17, 2017. Pursuant to section
705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final
determination will continue to be 75
days after the date of the preliminary
determination.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: January 18, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–01860 Filed 1–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3 In
this investigation, Petitioners are the
Coalition for Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood and
its individual members: Columbia Forest Products;
Commonwealth Plywood Co., Ltd.; Murphy
Plywood; Roseburg Forest Products Co.; States
Industries LLC; and Timber Products Company.
4 See 19 CFR 351.205(e).
5 See Petitioners’ letter of January 17, 2017,
requesting postponement of the preliminary
determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–041]
Truck and Bus Tires From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination,
Final Affirmative Critical
Circumstances Determination, in Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
truck and bus tires from the People’s
Republic of China (PRC). For
information on the estimated subsidy
rates, see the ‘‘Final Determination’’
section of this notice. The period of
investigation is January 1, 2015, through
December 31, 2015.
DATES: Effective January 27, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Shore or Mark Kennedy, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2778 or (202) 482–7883,
respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
The Department published the
Preliminary Determination on July 5,
2016.1 A summary of the events that
occurred since the Department
published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
1 See Truck and Bus Tires From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary
Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination,
in Part, and Alignment of Final Determination With
Final Antidumping Determination, 81 FR 43577
(July 5, 2016) (Preliminary Determination) and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum from Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination
in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Truck
and Bus Tires from the People’s Republic of China,’’
dated concurrently with this determination (Issues
and Decision Memorandum) and hereby adopted by
this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version are identical in
content.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are truck and bus tires
from the PRC. For a full description of
the scope of the investigation, see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Since the Preliminary Determination,
the Department has received comments
on the scope of this investigation from
the parties in this investigation. See
Issues and Decision Memorandum for
further details. The scope in Appendix
I reflects the final scope language.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised by parties, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is attached
to this notice at Appendix II.
Use of Adverse Facts Available
In making this final determination,
the Department relied, in part, on facts
available and, because the Government
of China and a respondent company did
not act to the best of their abilities in
responding to the Department’s requests
for information, we drew an adverse
inference where appropriate in selecting
from among the facts otherwise
available, pursuant to section 776(a) and
(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, (the Act). For further
information, see the section ‘‘Use of
Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse
Inferences’’ in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our analysis of information
requested and received from the GOC
and the company respondents since the
Preliminary Determination, the results
of verification, and the comments
received from parties, we have made
certain changes to the respondents’
subsidy rate calculations. For discussion
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 17 (Friday, January 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8605-8606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01860]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-052]
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain Hardwood Plywood
Products From the People's Republic of China: Postponement of
Preliminary Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective January 27, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Neuman at (202) 482-0486, or
Matthew Renkey at (202) 482-2312, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 8, 2016, the Department of Commerce (Department)
initiated the countervailing duty investigation of certain hardwood
plywood products (hardwood plywood) from the People's Republic of China
(PRC).\1\ Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than
February 13, 2017.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from People's Republic
of China: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81 FR
91131 (December 16, 2016) (Initiation).
\2\ The due date actually falls on February 11, 2017, which is a
Saturday. Therefore, the deadline moves to the next business day,
February 13, 2017. See Notice of Clarification: Application of
``Next Business Day'' Rule for Administrative Determination
Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR
24533 (May 10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postponement of Due Date for the Preliminary Determination
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (Act),
requires the Department to issue the preliminary determination in a
countervailing duty investigation within 65 days after the date on
which the Department initiated the investigation. However, in
[[Page 8606]]
accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(e), section 703(c)(1) of the Act permits
the Department to postpone the preliminary determination until no later
than 130 days after the date on which the Department initiated the
investigation if, among other reasons, Petitioners \3\ make a timely
request for a postponement, or the Department concludes that the
parties concerned are cooperating and determines that the investigation
is extraordinarily complicated. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), petitioners
must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the
scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must state the
reason for the request. The Department will grant the request unless it
finds compelling reasons to deny the request.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In this investigation, Petitioners are the Coalition for
Fair Trade in Hardwood Plywood and its individual members: Columbia
Forest Products; Commonwealth Plywood Co., Ltd.; Murphy Plywood;
Roseburg Forest Products Co.; States Industries LLC; and Timber
Products Company.
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.205(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the instant investigation, Petitioners made a timely request, on
January 17, 2017, that we postpone the preliminary CVD
determination.\5\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(e), Petitioner has
stated the reason for requesting a postponement of the preliminary
determination, and the Department finds no compelling reason to deny
the request. Therefore, pursuant to section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, we
are extending the due date for the preliminary determination to no
later than 130 days after the date on which this investigation was
initiated, i.e., to April 17, 2017. Pursuant to section 705(a)(1) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final
determination will continue to be 75 days after the date of the
preliminary determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Petitioners' letter of January 17, 2017, requesting
postponement of the preliminary determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: January 18, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-01860 Filed 1-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P