Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Give Up of a Clearing Trading Permit Holder, 8636-8641 [2017-01831]
Download as PDF
8636
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2017–004 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2017–004. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2017–004 and should be
submitted on or before February 17,
2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–01833 Filed 1–26–17; 8:45 am]
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79861; File No. SR–C2–
2017–004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2
Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Give Up of a
Clearing Trading Permit Holder
January 23, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
10, 2017, C2 Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II, below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules governing the give up of a Clearing
Participant by a Participant on Exchange
Transactions. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to augment its
requirements in C2 Rule 6.30 related to
the give up of a Clearing Participant by
a Participant on Exchange transactions.
By way of background, to enter
transactions on the Exchange, a
Participant must either be a Clearing
Participant or must have a Clearing
Participant agree to accept financial
responsibility for all of its transactions.
Additionally, Rule 6.30 currently
provides that when a Participant
executes a transaction on the Exchange,
it must give up the name of the Clearing
Participant (the ‘‘Give Up’’) through
which the transaction will be cleared
(i.e., ‘‘give up’’).
Designated Give Ups and Guarantors
The Exchange seeks to amend Rule
6.30 to provide that a Participant may
only give up a ‘‘Designated Give Up’’ or
its ‘‘Guarantor.’’ The Exchange proposes
to introduce and define the term
‘‘Designated Give Up.’’ For purposes of
Rule 6.30, a ‘‘Designated Give Up,’’ is
any Clearing Participant that a
Participant (other than a MarketMaker 5) identifies to the Exchange, in
writing, as a Clearing Participant that
the Participant would like to have the
ability to give up. To designate a
‘‘Designated Give Up’’ a Participant
must submit written notification, in a
form and manner determined by the
Exchange, to the Registration Services
Department (‘‘RSD’’). Specifically, the
Exchange anticipates using a
standardized form (‘‘Notification Form’’)
that a Participant would need to
complete and submit to the RSD. A copy
of the proposed Notification Form is
included with this filing in Exhibit 3.
Similarly, should a Participant no
longer want the ability to give up a
particular Designated Give Up, it must
submit written notification, in a form
and manner determined by the
Exchange, to the RSD. The Exchanges
[sic] notes that a Participant may
designate any Clearing Participant as a
Designated Give Up. Additionally, there
is no minimum or maximum number of
Designated Give Ups that a Participant
must identify. The Exchange shall notify
a Clearing Participant, in writing and as
soon as practicable, of each Participant
that has identified it as a Designated
5 For purposes of this rule, references to ‘‘MarketMaker’’ shall refer to Participants acting in the
capacity of a Market-Maker and shall include all
Exchange Market-Maker capacities (e.g., Designated
Primary Market-Makers).
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
Give Up. The Exchange anticipates
obtaining the contact information of a
Clearing Participant by having each
Clearing Participant complete a
standardized form (‘‘Designated Give Up
Contact Form’’) and submit it to the
RSD. A copy of the proposed Designated
Give Up Contact Form is included with
this filing in Exhibit 3. The Exchange
however, will not accept any
instructions, and not give effect to any
previous instructions, from a Clearing
Participant not to permit a Participant to
designate the Clearing Participant as a
Designated Give Up. The Exchange
notes that there is no subjective
evaluation of a Participant’s list of
proposed Designated Give Ups by the
Exchange. Rather, the Exchange intends
to process each list as submitted and
ensure that the Clearing Participants
identified as Designated Give Ups are in
fact current Clearing Participants, as
well as confirm that the Notification
Forms are complete (e.g., contains
appropriate signatures) and the OCC
numbers listed for each Clearing
Participant are accurate.
The Exchange also proposes to define
the term ‘‘Guarantor’’ in the proposed
rule text. For purposes of proposed Rule
6.30, a ‘‘Guarantor’’ shall refer to a
Clearing Participant that has issued a
Letter of Guarantee or Letter of
Authorization for the executing
Participant under the C2 Rule 3.10
(Letters of Guarantee and Authorization)
that is in effect at the time of the
execution of the applicable trade. An
executing Participant may give up its
Guarantor without having to first
designate it to the Exchange as a
‘‘Designated Give Up.’’
As noted above, the proposed rule
change seeks to provide that a
Participant may give up only (i) the
name of a Clearing Participant that has
previously been identified and
processed by the Exchange as a
Designated Give Up for that Participant,
if not a Market-Maker or (ii) its
Guarantor. This limitation shall be
enforced by the Exchange’s trading
systems. Specifically, the Exchange will
configure its trading systems to only
accept orders from a Participant which
identify a Designated Give Up or
Guarantor for that Participant and will
reject any order entered by a Participant
which designates a Give Up that is not
at the time a Designated Give Up or
Guarantor of the Participant. The
Exchange notes that it will notify a
Participant in writing when an
identified Designated Give Up becomes
‘‘effective’’ (i.e., when a Clearing
Participant that has been identified by
the Participant as a Designated Give Up
has been enabled by the Exchange’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
trading systems to be given up). A
Guarantor for a Participant shall be
enabled to be given up for that
Participant without any further action
by the Participant (i.e., submitting its
name as a Designated Give Up on the
Notification Form). The Exchange notes
that this configuration (i.e., the trading
system accepting only orders which
identify a Designated Give Up or
Guarantor) is intended to help reduce
‘‘keypunch errors’’ and prevent
Participants from mistakenly giving up
the name of a Clearing Participant that
it had no intention of ever using as a
Give Up.
Acceptance of a Trade
The Exchange next proposes to permit
a Designated Give Up and a Guarantor
to, in certain circumstances, determine
not to accept a trade on which its name
was given up. If a Designated Give Up
or Guarantor determines not to accept a
trade, it may reject the trade in
accordance with the procedures
described more fully below.
A Designated Give Up may determine
to not accept a trade on which its name
was given up so long as it believes in
good faith that it has a valid reason not
to accept the trade. Examples of valid
reasons may be that the Designated Give
Up does not have a customer for that
particular trade or that another Clearing
Participant agrees to be the Give Up on
the trade and has notified the Exchange
and executing Participant in writing of
its intent to accept the trade. If a
Designated Give Up determines to not
accept (and thereby reject) a trade on
which its name was given up, the
executing Participant’s Guarantor or
another Clearing Participant that agrees
to be the Give Up on the trade shall
become the Give Up. Next, the Exchange
proposes to provide that a Guarantor
may not accept (and thereby reject) a
non-Marker-Maker trade on which its
name was given up only if another
Clearing Participant agrees to be the
Give Up on the trade and has notified
the Exchange and executing Participant
in writing of its intent to accept the
trade. The Exchange notes that only a
Designated Give Up or Guarantor whose
name was initially given up on a trade
is permitted to not accept the trade,
subject to the conditions noted above
(i.e., the Clearing Participant or
Guarantor that becomes the Give Up on
a rejected trade may not also reject the
trade).
Rejection of a Trade
The Exchange has incorporated into
proposed Rule 6.30 procedures that
must be followed in order for a
Designated Give Up to reject a trade. A
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8637
trade may only be rejected on (i) the
trade date or (ii) the business day
following the trade date (‘‘T+1’’) (except
that transactions in expiring options
series may not be rejected on T+1).
Rejection on Trade Date
If a Designated Give Up decides to
reject a trade on the trade date, it must
first notify, in writing, the executing
Participant or its designated agent, as
soon as possible and attempt to resolve
the disputed give up. This requirement
puts the executing Participant on notice
that the Give Up on the trade may be
changed and provides the executing
Participant and Designated Give Up an
opportunity to resolve the dispute in a
manner agreeable to each party. The
Exchange notes that a Designated Give
Up may request from the Exchange the
contact information of the executing
Participant or its designated agent for
any trade it wishes to reject.
Following notification to the
executing Participant on the trade date,
a Designated Give Up may request the
ability from the Exchange to change the
Give Up on the trade. This request must
be made by completing and submitting
a standardized form (‘‘Give Up Change
Form’’) to the Exchange. A copy of the
proposed Give Up Change Form is
included with this filing in Exhibit 3. So
long as the Exchange is able to process
the request prior to the trade input
cutoff time established by the Clearing
Corporation (or fifteen minutes
thereafter, so long as the Exchange
receives and is able to process a request
to extend its time of final trade
submission to the Clearing Corporation)
(‘‘Trade Date Cutoff Time’’), the
Exchange will provide the Designated
Give Up the ability to make the change
to the Give Up on the trade to either (1)
another Clearing Participant or (2) the
executing Participant’s Guarantor.
A Designated Give Up may change the
Give Up to another Clearing Participant
(‘‘New Clearing Participant’’) (i.e., a
Clearing Participant that is not the
executing Participant’s Guarantor) only
if that Clearing Participant has agreed to
be the give up on the trade and has first
notified the Exchange and the executing
Participant in writing of its intent to
accept the trade. To notify the
Exchange, the New Clearing Participant
must complete and submit a
standardized form (i.e., the Give-Up
Change Form for Accepting Clearing
Trading Permit Holders) to the
Exchange. A copy of the proposed GiveUp Change Form for Accepting Clearing
Trading Permit Holders is included with
this filing in Exhibit 3. The Exchange
notes that any Clearing Participant may
agree to accept a trade from the
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
8638
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Designated Give Up that is rejecting the
trade (i.e., the New Clearing Participant
does not have to already be a Designated
Give Up of the executing Participant).
The Exchange also notes that a New
Clearing Participant that has agreed to
accept a trade and become the Give Up
cannot later reject the trade. Requiring
the New Clearing Participant to provide
notice to the Exchange of its intent to
accept the trade and prohibiting the
New Clearing Participant from later
rejecting the trade provides finality to
the trade and ensures that the trade is
not repeatedly reassigned from one
Clearing Participant to another.
The Exchange also seeks to provide
that a Designated Give Up may
alternatively change the Give Up to the
executing Participant’s Guarantor. The
Guarantor does not need to notify the
Exchange of its intent to accept the trade
nor does it need to submit any
notification or form. The Designated
Give Up however, must first provide
written notice to the Guarantor that it
will be making this change. A Guarantor
that becomes the Give Up on a trade as
a result of the Designated Give Up
rejecting the trade is prohibited from not
accepting the trade/rejecting the trade.
This prohibition provides finality to the
trade and ensures that the trade is not
repeatedly reassigned from one Clearing
Participant to another.
A Guarantor may also reject a nonMarket-Maker trade for which its name
was the initial given up by a Participant,
but only if another Clearing Participant
has first agreed to be the Give Up on the
trade and has notified the Exchange and
executing Participant in writing of its
intent to accept the trade. If a Guarantor
of a Participant decides to reject a trade
on the trade date, it must follow the
same procedures to change the Give Up
as would be followed by a Designated
Give Up. The ability to make any
changes, either by the Designated Give
Up or Guarantor, to the Give Up
pursuant to this procedure will end at
the Trade Date Cutoff Time.
Finally, once the Give Up has been
changed, the Designated Give Up or
Guarantor making the change must
immediately thereafter notify the
Exchange, the parties to the trade and
the New Clearing Participant of the
change in writing.
Rejection on T+1
The Exchange next acknowledges that
some clearing firms may not reconcile
their trades until after the Trade Date
Cutoff Time. A clearing firm therefore,
may not realize that a valid reason exists
to not accept a particular trade until
after the close of the trading day or until
the following morning. Accordingly, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Exchange seeks to establish a procedure
for a Designated Give Up or Guarantor
of a Participant that is not a MarketMaker to reject a trade on the following
trade day (‘‘T+1’’). The Exchange notes
that a separate procedure must be
established for T+1 changes because to
effectively change the Give Up on a
trade on T+1, an offsetting reversal has
to occur (as opposed to merely
identifying a different Clearing
Participant on the trade). More
specifically, a buy side must be entered
by one Clearing Participant and the sell
side must be entered by the other
Clearing Participant in order to effect
the moving of the position from one
Clearing Participant to another.
A Designed [sic] Give Up that wishes
to reject a trade on T+1 must first notify
the executing Participant, in writing, to
try to attempt and resolve the dispute.
Following notification to the
Participant, a Designated Give Up may
contact the Exchange and request the
ability to enter trade records into the
Exchange’s trading system on behalf of
itself and either the New Clearing
Participant or the executing
Participant’s Guarantor, which would
effect a transfer of the trade to the new
Give Up. So long as the Exchange is able
to process the request prior to 12:00
p.m. (CT) on T+1 (‘‘T+1 Cutoff Time’’),
the Exchange shall provide the
Designated Give Up the ability to do so.
The request must be made in writing
using a standardized form (i.e., the Give
Up Change Form) from the Exchange. In
the event a New Clearing Participant
will be accepting the trade as the Give
Up, the New Clearing Participant must
also complete and submit the C2 GiveUp Change Form for Accepting Clearing
Participants. A Guarantor that becomes
the new Give Up on T+1 does not need
to notify the Exchange of its intent to
accept the trade nor does it need to
submit any notification or form. The
Designated Give Up however, must first
provide written notice to the Guarantor
that it will be making this change on
T+1.
An executing Participant’s Guarantor
that was the initial Give Up on a trade
may also reject the trade on T+1, but
may only change the Give Up to another
Clearing Participant that has first agreed
to be the Give Up on the trade and has
notified the Exchange (by submitting the
Give Up Change Form) and executing
Participant in writing of its intent to
accept the trade. If a Guarantor of a
Participant decides to reject a nonMarket-Maker trade on T+1, it must
follow the same procedures outlined in
subparagraph (f)(iii). The Exchange
again notes that only a Guarantor whose
name was initially given up is permitted
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to reject a trade (i.e., a Guarantor cannot
reject a trade on T+1 for which it has
become the give up as a result of a
Designated Give Up not accepting the
trade).
The ability for either a Designated
Give Up or Guarantor to make these
changes shall end at the T+1 Cutoff
Time. The Exchange notes that that the
T+1 Cutoff Time is 12:00 p.m. (CT) to
provide finality and certainty as to
which Clearing Participant will be the
Clearing Participant for the trade.
Once the change to the Give Up has
been made, the Designated Give Up or
Guarantor making the change must
immediately thereafter notify the
Exchange, the parties to the trade and
the New Clearing Participant of the
change in writing. The Exchange notes
that the T+1 procedure is not applicable
to trades in expiring options series that
take place on the last trading day prior
to their expiration. Rather, a Designated
Give Up and Guarantor may only reject
these transactions on the trade date
until the Trade Date Cutoff Time in
accordance with the trade date
procedures described above.
As discussed above, the Exchange is
allowing Participant s [sic] that are not
Market-Makers to identify any Clearing
Participant as a Designated Give Up.
Also as discussed, the Exchange has
determined not to take instructions from
a Clearing Participant not to permit a
particular Participant from giving up
their name so that the Exchange will not
be placed in the position of arbiter
between a Clearing Participant, a
Participant and a customer. The
Exchange recognizes, however, that
Participants should not be given the
ability to give up any Clearing
Participant without also providing a
method of recourse to those Clearing
Participants which, for the prescribed
reasons discussed above, should not be
obligated to clear certain trades for
which they are given up. The Exchange
accordingly is seeking to provide
Designated Give Ups and Guarantors the
ability to, where appropriate, reject a
trade. Ultimately, however, the trade
must clear with a clearing firm and
there must be finality to the trade. The
Exchange believes that the executing
Participant’s Guarantor, absent a
Clearing Participant that agrees to
accept the trade, should become the
Give Up on any trade which a
Designated Give Up determines to reject
in accordance with these proposed rule
provisions, because the Guarantor, by
virtue of having issued a Letter of
Guarantee or Authorization, has already
accepted financial responsibility for all
Exchange transactions made by the
executing Participant. The Exchange
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
however, does not want to prevent a
Clearing Participant that agrees to
accept the trade from being able to do
so, and accordingly, the Exchange also
provides that a New Clearing Participant
may become the Give Up on a trade in
accordance with the procedure
discussed above.
Other Give Up Changes
The Exchange seeks to codify in its
proposed rule three scenarios in which
a Give Up on a transaction may be
changed without Exchange
involvement. First, if an executing
Participant has the ability through an
Exchange system to do so, it may change
the Give Up on a trade to another
Designated Give Up or its Guarantor.
The Exchange notes that Participants
often make these changes when, for
example, there was a keypunch error
(i.e. an error that involves the erroneous
entry of an intended clearing firm’s OCC
clearing number). The ability of the
executing Participant to make any such
change will end at the Trade Date Cutoff
Time.6
Next, the proposed rule provides that,
if a Designated Give Up has the ability
to do so, it may change the Give Up on
a transaction for which it was given up
to (i) another Clearing Participant
affiliated with the Designated Give Up
or (ii) a Clearing Participant that is a
back office agent for the Designated Give
Up. The ability to make such a change
will end at the Trade Date Cutoff Time.
The procedures in proposed
subparagraph (f) of Rule 6.30 that were
previously described will not apply in
these instances. The Exchange notes
that often Clearing Participants
themselves have the ability to change a
Give Up on a trade for which it was
given up to another Clearing Participant
affiliate or Clearing Participant for
which the Designated Give Up is a back
office agent. Therefore, Exchange
involvement in these instances is not
necessary.
Lastly, the proposed rule provides
that if both a Designated Give Up and
a Clearing Participant have the ability
through an Exchange system to do so,
the Designated Give Up and Clearing
Participant may each enter trade records
into the Exchange’s systems on T+1 that
would effect a transfer of the trade in a
non-expired option series from that
Designated Give Up to that Clearing
Participant. Likewise, if a Guarantor of
a Participant trade that is not a MarketMaker trade and a Clearing Participant
have the ability through an Exchange
6 After that time, the Participant will no longer
have the ability to make this type of change as the
trade will have been submitted to OCC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
system to do so, the Guarantor and
Clearing Participant may each enter
trade records into the Exchange’s
systems on T+1 that would effect a
transfer of the trade in a non-expired
option series from that Guarantor to that
Clearing Participant. The Designated
Give Up or Guarantor shall not make
any such change after the T+1 Cutoff
Time. The Exchange notes that a
Designated Give Up (or Guarantor) must
notify, in writing, the Exchange and all
the parties to the trade, of any such
change made pursuant to this provision.
This notification alerts the parties and
the Exchange that a change to the Give
Up has been made. Finally, the
Designated Give Up (or Guarantor) will
be responsible for monitoring the trade
and ensuring that the other Clearing
Participant has entered its side of the
transaction timely and correctly. If
either a Designated Give Up (or
Guarantor) or Clearing Participant
cannot themselves enter trade records
into the Exchange’s systems to effect a
transfer of the trade from one to the
other, the Designated Give Up (or
Guarantor) may request the ability from
the Exchange to enter both sides of the
transaction in accordance with this
amended Rule 6.30 and pursuant to the
procedures set forth in subparagraph
(f)(iii) of that Rule.
Responsibility
For purposes of the Rules of the
Exchange, a Clearing Participant will be
financially responsible for all trades for
which it is the Give Up at the
Applicable Cutoff Time (for purposes of
the proposed rule, the ‘‘Applicable
Cutoff Time’’ shall refer to the T+1
Cutoff Time for non-expiring option
series and to the Trade Date Cutoff Time
for expiring option series). The
Exchange notes however, that nothing
in the proposed rule shall preclude a
different party from being responsible
for the trade outside of the Rules of the
Exchange pursuant to OCC Rules, any
agreement between the applicable
parties, other applicable rules and
regulations, arbitration, court
proceedings or otherwise. Moreover, in
processing a request to provide a
Designated Give Up the ability to
change a Give Up on a trade, the
Exchange will not consider or validate
whether the Designated Give Up has
satisfied the requirements of this Rule in
relation to having a good faith belief that
it has a valid reason not to accept a
trade or having notified the executing
Participant and attempting to resolve
the disputed Give Up prior to changing
the Give Up. Rather, upon request, the
Exchange shall always provide a
Designated Give Up or Guarantor the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8639
ability to change the give up or to reject
a trade pursuant to the proposed rule so
long as the Designated Give Up or
Guarantor, and New Clearing
Participant if applicable, have provided
a completed Give Up Change Forms
within the prescribed time period. The
Exchange notes that given the inherent
time constraints in making a change to
a Give Up on a transaction, the
Exchange would not be able to
adequately consider the abovementioned requirements and make a
determination within the prescribed
period of time. Rather, the Exchange
will examine trades for which a Give Up
was changed pursuant to subparagraphs
(e) and (f) after the fact to ensure that
requirements set forth in amended Rule
6.30 were complied with. Particularly,
the Exchange notes that the Give Up
Change Forms that Designated Give
Ups, Guarantors and New Clearing
Participants must submit, will help to
ensure that the Exchange obtains, in a
uniform format, the information that it
needs to monitor and regulate this rule
and these give up changes in particular.
This information, for example, will
better allow the Exchange to determine
whether the Designated Give Up had a
valid reason to reject the trade, as well
as assist the Exchange in cross checking
and confirming that what the
Designated Give Up or Guarantor said it
was going to do is what it actually did
(e.g., check that the New Clearing
Participant identified in the Give Up
Change Form was the Clearing
Participant that actually was identified
on the trade as the Give Up).
Additionally, the proposed rule does
not preclude these factors from being
considered in a different forum (e.g.,
court or arbitration) nor does it preclude
any Clearing Participant that violates
any provision of amended Rule 6.30
from being subject to discipline in
accordance with Exchange rules.
The Exchange proposes to announce
the implementation date of the
proposed rule change in a Regulatory
Circular, to be published no later than
thirty (30) days following the date of
filing. The implementation date will be
no later than ninety (90) days following
publication of the Regulatory Circular.
The Exchange notes this additional time
gives Participants time to provide their
lists of all Clearing Participants that
they would like to designate as
‘‘Designated Give Ups’’ and gives the
Exchange time to process those lists and
configure its system accordingly.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8640
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.7 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 8 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 9 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
First, detailing in the rules how
Participants will give up Clearing
Participants and how Clearing
Participants may ‘‘reject’’ a trade
provides transparency and operational
certainty. The Exchange believes
additional transparency removes a
potential impediment to, and will
contribute to perfecting, the mechanism
for a free and open market and a
national market system, and, in general,
will protect investors and the public
interest. Moreover, the Exchange notes
that amended Rule 6.30 requires
standardized forms to be used in the
designation of Designated Give Ups to
ensure a seamless administration of the
Rule. The Rule also requires that
Clearing Participants submit
standardized forms when requesting the
ability to reject a trade and that all
notifications relating to a change in Give
Up are in writing. These requirements
will aid the Exchange’s efforts to
monitor and regulate Participants and
Clearing Participants as they relate to
amended Rule 6.30 and changes in give
ups, thereby protecting investors and
the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
in evaluating its give up rule provisions,
it solicited feedback from a variety of
market participants. The Exchange
believes that its proposed give up rule
strikes the right balance between the
various views and interests across the
industry. For example, although the rule
allows Participants that are not MarketMakers to identify any Clearing
7 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
Jkt 241001
Participant as a Designated Give Up, it
also provides that Clearing Participants
will receive notice of any Participant
that has designated it as a Designated
Give Up and provides for a procedure
for a Clearing Participant to ‘‘reject’’ a
trade in accordance with the Rules, both
on the trade date and T+1. The
Exchange recognizes that Participants
should not be given the ability to give
up any Clearing Participant without also
providing a method of recourse to those
Clearing Participants which, for the
prescribed reasons discussed above,
should not be obligated to clear certain
trades for which they are given up. The
Exchange believes that providing
Designated Give Ups the ability to reject
a trade within a reasonable amount of
time is consistent with the Act as,
pursuant to the proposed rule, the
Designated Give Ups may only do so if
they have a valid reason and because
ultimately, the trade can always be
assigned to the Guarantor of the
executing Participant. A trade must
clear with a clearing firm and there
must be finality to the trade. The
Exchange believes that the executing
Participant’s Guarantor, absent a
Clearing Participant that agrees to
accept the trade, should become the
Give Up on any trade which a
Designated Give Up determines to reject
in accordance with the proposed rule
provisions, because the Guarantor, by
virtue of having issued a Letter of
Guarantee or Authorization, has already
accepted financial responsibility for all
Exchange transactions made by the
executing Participant. Therefore,
amended Rule 6.30 is reasonable and
provides certainty that a Clearing
Participant will always be responsible
for a trade, which protects investors and
the public interest.
Lastly, the Exchange notes that
amended Rule 6.30 does not preclude a
different party than the party given up
from being responsible for the trade
outside of the Rules of the Exchange
pursuant to OCC Rules, any agreement
between the applicable parties, other
applicable rules and regulations,
arbitration, court proceedings or
otherwise. The Exchange acknowledges
that it will not consider whether the
Designated Give Up has satisfied the
requirements of this Rule in relation to
having a good faith belief that it has a
valid reason not to accept a trade or
having notified the executing
Participant and attempting to resolve
the disputed Give Up prior to changing
the Give Up, due to inherent time
restrictions. However, the Exchange
believes investor and public interest are
still protected as the Exchange will still
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
examine trades for which a Give Up was
changed pursuant to subparagraphs (e)
and (f) of amended Rule 6.30 after the
fact to ensure that the requirements set
forth in the Rule were complied with.
As noted above, the use of standardized
forms and the requirement that certain
notices be in writing will assist
monitoring any give up changes and
enforcing amended Rule 6.30. Finally,
the Exchange notes that the Rule does
not preclude these factors from being
considered in a different forum (e.g.,
court or arbitration) nor does it preclude
any Participant or Clearing Participant
that violates any provision of amended
Rule 6.30 from being subject to
discipline by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed
rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule
change will impose an unnecessary
burden on intramarket competition
because it will apply equally to all
similarly situated Participants. The
Exchange also notes that, should the
proposed changes make C2 more
attractive for trading, market
participants trading on other exchanges
can always elect to become Participants
on C2 to take advantage of the trading
opportunities.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 11 thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12 normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. However, Rule 19b–
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
11 17
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 17 / Friday, January 27, 2017 / Notices
4(f)(6)(iii) 13 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay so that it can implement the
proposed rule change as early as the last
week in January. The Commission
believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. The Commission notes that the
Exchange’s proposed rule change is
based on a substantially similar
proposed rule change submitted by
CBOE, which the Commission approved
after receiving no comments.14 The
Commission also notes that the filing
raises no novel issues apart from those
already considered in the earlier CBOE
filing. Therefore, the Commission
waives the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
C2–2017–004 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
13 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72668
(July 24, 2014), 79 FR 44229 (July 30, 2014) (SR–
CBOE–2014–048).
15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission also has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
13:58 Jan 26, 2017
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–01831 Filed 1–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2017–004. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–C2–
2017–004 and should be submitted on
or before February 17, 2017.
Jkt 241001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79864; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2016–97]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Listing and Trading of Shares of the
PowerShares Government Collateral
Pledge Portfolio Under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.600
January 23, 2017.
On July 6, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. filed
with the Securities and Exchange
16 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8641
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to list and trade shares of the
PowerShares Government Collateral
Pledge Portfolio. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on July 26, 2016.3
On September 1, 2016, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.5 On October 21,
2016, the Commission instituted
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.6 The Commission has
received no comments on the proposed
rule change.
On January 17, 2017, the Exchange
withdrew the proposed rule change
(SR–NYSEArca–2016–97).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017–01834 Filed 1–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213
Extension:
Rule 12d3–1 SEC File No. 270–504, OMB
Control No. 3235–0561
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78373
(July 20, 2016), 81 FR 48869.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78750,
81 FR 62233 (September 8, 2016).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79131,
81 FR 74840 (October 27, 2016).
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 17 (Friday, January 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8636-8641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-79861; File No. SR-C2-2017-004]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Give Up of a Clearing Trading Permit Holder
January 23, 2017.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on January 10, 2017, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules governing the give up of a
Clearing Participant by a Participant on Exchange Transactions. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to augment its requirements in C2 Rule 6.30
related to the give up of a Clearing Participant by a Participant on
Exchange transactions. By way of background, to enter transactions on
the Exchange, a Participant must either be a Clearing Participant or
must have a Clearing Participant agree to accept financial
responsibility for all of its transactions. Additionally, Rule 6.30
currently provides that when a Participant executes a transaction on
the Exchange, it must give up the name of the Clearing Participant (the
``Give Up'') through which the transaction will be cleared (i.e.,
``give up'').
Designated Give Ups and Guarantors
The Exchange seeks to amend Rule 6.30 to provide that a Participant
may only give up a ``Designated Give Up'' or its ``Guarantor.'' The
Exchange proposes to introduce and define the term ``Designated Give
Up.'' For purposes of Rule 6.30, a ``Designated Give Up,'' is any
Clearing Participant that a Participant (other than a Market-Maker \5\)
identifies to the Exchange, in writing, as a Clearing Participant that
the Participant would like to have the ability to give up. To designate
a ``Designated Give Up'' a Participant must submit written
notification, in a form and manner determined by the Exchange, to the
Registration Services Department (``RSD''). Specifically, the Exchange
anticipates using a standardized form (``Notification Form'') that a
Participant would need to complete and submit to the RSD. A copy of the
proposed Notification Form is included with this filing in Exhibit 3.
Similarly, should a Participant no longer want the ability to give up a
particular Designated Give Up, it must submit written notification, in
a form and manner determined by the Exchange, to the RSD. The Exchanges
[sic] notes that a Participant may designate any Clearing Participant
as a Designated Give Up. Additionally, there is no minimum or maximum
number of Designated Give Ups that a Participant must identify. The
Exchange shall notify a Clearing Participant, in writing and as soon as
practicable, of each Participant that has identified it as a Designated
[[Page 8637]]
Give Up. The Exchange anticipates obtaining the contact information of
a Clearing Participant by having each Clearing Participant complete a
standardized form (``Designated Give Up Contact Form'') and submit it
to the RSD. A copy of the proposed Designated Give Up Contact Form is
included with this filing in Exhibit 3. The Exchange however, will not
accept any instructions, and not give effect to any previous
instructions, from a Clearing Participant not to permit a Participant
to designate the Clearing Participant as a Designated Give Up. The
Exchange notes that there is no subjective evaluation of a
Participant's list of proposed Designated Give Ups by the Exchange.
Rather, the Exchange intends to process each list as submitted and
ensure that the Clearing Participants identified as Designated Give Ups
are in fact current Clearing Participants, as well as confirm that the
Notification Forms are complete (e.g., contains appropriate signatures)
and the OCC numbers listed for each Clearing Participant are accurate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For purposes of this rule, references to ``Market-Maker''
shall refer to Participants acting in the capacity of a Market-Maker
and shall include all Exchange Market-Maker capacities (e.g.,
Designated Primary Market-Makers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to define the term ``Guarantor'' in the
proposed rule text. For purposes of proposed Rule 6.30, a ``Guarantor''
shall refer to a Clearing Participant that has issued a Letter of
Guarantee or Letter of Authorization for the executing Participant
under the C2 Rule 3.10 (Letters of Guarantee and Authorization) that is
in effect at the time of the execution of the applicable trade. An
executing Participant may give up its Guarantor without having to first
designate it to the Exchange as a ``Designated Give Up.''
As noted above, the proposed rule change seeks to provide that a
Participant may give up only (i) the name of a Clearing Participant
that has previously been identified and processed by the Exchange as a
Designated Give Up for that Participant, if not a Market-Maker or (ii)
its Guarantor. This limitation shall be enforced by the Exchange's
trading systems. Specifically, the Exchange will configure its trading
systems to only accept orders from a Participant which identify a
Designated Give Up or Guarantor for that Participant and will reject
any order entered by a Participant which designates a Give Up that is
not at the time a Designated Give Up or Guarantor of the Participant.
The Exchange notes that it will notify a Participant in writing when an
identified Designated Give Up becomes ``effective'' (i.e., when a
Clearing Participant that has been identified by the Participant as a
Designated Give Up has been enabled by the Exchange's trading systems
to be given up). A Guarantor for a Participant shall be enabled to be
given up for that Participant without any further action by the
Participant (i.e., submitting its name as a Designated Give Up on the
Notification Form). The Exchange notes that this configuration (i.e.,
the trading system accepting only orders which identify a Designated
Give Up or Guarantor) is intended to help reduce ``keypunch errors''
and prevent Participants from mistakenly giving up the name of a
Clearing Participant that it had no intention of ever using as a Give
Up.
Acceptance of a Trade
The Exchange next proposes to permit a Designated Give Up and a
Guarantor to, in certain circumstances, determine not to accept a trade
on which its name was given up. If a Designated Give Up or Guarantor
determines not to accept a trade, it may reject the trade in accordance
with the procedures described more fully below.
A Designated Give Up may determine to not accept a trade on which
its name was given up so long as it believes in good faith that it has
a valid reason not to accept the trade. Examples of valid reasons may
be that the Designated Give Up does not have a customer for that
particular trade or that another Clearing Participant agrees to be the
Give Up on the trade and has notified the Exchange and executing
Participant in writing of its intent to accept the trade. If a
Designated Give Up determines to not accept (and thereby reject) a
trade on which its name was given up, the executing Participant's
Guarantor or another Clearing Participant that agrees to be the Give Up
on the trade shall become the Give Up. Next, the Exchange proposes to
provide that a Guarantor may not accept (and thereby reject) a non-
Marker-Maker trade on which its name was given up only if another
Clearing Participant agrees to be the Give Up on the trade and has
notified the Exchange and executing Participant in writing of its
intent to accept the trade. The Exchange notes that only a Designated
Give Up or Guarantor whose name was initially given up on a trade is
permitted to not accept the trade, subject to the conditions noted
above (i.e., the Clearing Participant or Guarantor that becomes the
Give Up on a rejected trade may not also reject the trade).
Rejection of a Trade
The Exchange has incorporated into proposed Rule 6.30 procedures
that must be followed in order for a Designated Give Up to reject a
trade. A trade may only be rejected on (i) the trade date or (ii) the
business day following the trade date (``T+1'') (except that
transactions in expiring options series may not be rejected on T+1).
Rejection on Trade Date
If a Designated Give Up decides to reject a trade on the trade
date, it must first notify, in writing, the executing Participant or
its designated agent, as soon as possible and attempt to resolve the
disputed give up. This requirement puts the executing Participant on
notice that the Give Up on the trade may be changed and provides the
executing Participant and Designated Give Up an opportunity to resolve
the dispute in a manner agreeable to each party. The Exchange notes
that a Designated Give Up may request from the Exchange the contact
information of the executing Participant or its designated agent for
any trade it wishes to reject.
Following notification to the executing Participant on the trade
date, a Designated Give Up may request the ability from the Exchange to
change the Give Up on the trade. This request must be made by
completing and submitting a standardized form (``Give Up Change Form'')
to the Exchange. A copy of the proposed Give Up Change Form is included
with this filing in Exhibit 3. So long as the Exchange is able to
process the request prior to the trade input cutoff time established by
the Clearing Corporation (or fifteen minutes thereafter, so long as the
Exchange receives and is able to process a request to extend its time
of final trade submission to the Clearing Corporation) (``Trade Date
Cutoff Time''), the Exchange will provide the Designated Give Up the
ability to make the change to the Give Up on the trade to either (1)
another Clearing Participant or (2) the executing Participant's
Guarantor.
A Designated Give Up may change the Give Up to another Clearing
Participant (``New Clearing Participant'') (i.e., a Clearing
Participant that is not the executing Participant's Guarantor) only if
that Clearing Participant has agreed to be the give up on the trade and
has first notified the Exchange and the executing Participant in
writing of its intent to accept the trade. To notify the Exchange, the
New Clearing Participant must complete and submit a standardized form
(i.e., the Give-Up Change Form for Accepting Clearing Trading Permit
Holders) to the Exchange. A copy of the proposed Give-Up Change Form
for Accepting Clearing Trading Permit Holders is included with this
filing in Exhibit 3. The Exchange notes that any Clearing Participant
may agree to accept a trade from the
[[Page 8638]]
Designated Give Up that is rejecting the trade (i.e., the New Clearing
Participant does not have to already be a Designated Give Up of the
executing Participant). The Exchange also notes that a New Clearing
Participant that has agreed to accept a trade and become the Give Up
cannot later reject the trade. Requiring the New Clearing Participant
to provide notice to the Exchange of its intent to accept the trade and
prohibiting the New Clearing Participant from later rejecting the trade
provides finality to the trade and ensures that the trade is not
repeatedly reassigned from one Clearing Participant to another.
The Exchange also seeks to provide that a Designated Give Up may
alternatively change the Give Up to the executing Participant's
Guarantor. The Guarantor does not need to notify the Exchange of its
intent to accept the trade nor does it need to submit any notification
or form. The Designated Give Up however, must first provide written
notice to the Guarantor that it will be making this change. A Guarantor
that becomes the Give Up on a trade as a result of the Designated Give
Up rejecting the trade is prohibited from not accepting the trade/
rejecting the trade. This prohibition provides finality to the trade
and ensures that the trade is not repeatedly reassigned from one
Clearing Participant to another.
A Guarantor may also reject a non-Market-Maker trade for which its
name was the initial given up by a Participant, but only if another
Clearing Participant has first agreed to be the Give Up on the trade
and has notified the Exchange and executing Participant in writing of
its intent to accept the trade. If a Guarantor of a Participant decides
to reject a trade on the trade date, it must follow the same procedures
to change the Give Up as would be followed by a Designated Give Up. The
ability to make any changes, either by the Designated Give Up or
Guarantor, to the Give Up pursuant to this procedure will end at the
Trade Date Cutoff Time.
Finally, once the Give Up has been changed, the Designated Give Up
or Guarantor making the change must immediately thereafter notify the
Exchange, the parties to the trade and the New Clearing Participant of
the change in writing.
Rejection on T+1
The Exchange next acknowledges that some clearing firms may not
reconcile their trades until after the Trade Date Cutoff Time. A
clearing firm therefore, may not realize that a valid reason exists to
not accept a particular trade until after the close of the trading day
or until the following morning. Accordingly, the Exchange seeks to
establish a procedure for a Designated Give Up or Guarantor of a
Participant that is not a Market-Maker to reject a trade on the
following trade day (``T+1''). The Exchange notes that a separate
procedure must be established for T+1 changes because to effectively
change the Give Up on a trade on T+1, an offsetting reversal has to
occur (as opposed to merely identifying a different Clearing
Participant on the trade). More specifically, a buy side must be
entered by one Clearing Participant and the sell side must be entered
by the other Clearing Participant in order to effect the moving of the
position from one Clearing Participant to another.
A Designed [sic] Give Up that wishes to reject a trade on T+1 must
first notify the executing Participant, in writing, to try to attempt
and resolve the dispute. Following notification to the Participant, a
Designated Give Up may contact the Exchange and request the ability to
enter trade records into the Exchange's trading system on behalf of
itself and either the New Clearing Participant or the executing
Participant's Guarantor, which would effect a transfer of the trade to
the new Give Up. So long as the Exchange is able to process the request
prior to 12:00 p.m. (CT) on T+1 (``T+1 Cutoff Time''), the Exchange
shall provide the Designated Give Up the ability to do so. The request
must be made in writing using a standardized form (i.e., the Give Up
Change Form) from the Exchange. In the event a New Clearing Participant
will be accepting the trade as the Give Up, the New Clearing
Participant must also complete and submit the C2 Give-Up Change Form
for Accepting Clearing Participants. A Guarantor that becomes the new
Give Up on T+1 does not need to notify the Exchange of its intent to
accept the trade nor does it need to submit any notification or form.
The Designated Give Up however, must first provide written notice to
the Guarantor that it will be making this change on T+1.
An executing Participant's Guarantor that was the initial Give Up
on a trade may also reject the trade on T+1, but may only change the
Give Up to another Clearing Participant that has first agreed to be the
Give Up on the trade and has notified the Exchange (by submitting the
Give Up Change Form) and executing Participant in writing of its intent
to accept the trade. If a Guarantor of a Participant decides to reject
a non-Market-Maker trade on T+1, it must follow the same procedures
outlined in subparagraph (f)(iii). The Exchange again notes that only a
Guarantor whose name was initially given up is permitted to reject a
trade (i.e., a Guarantor cannot reject a trade on T+1 for which it has
become the give up as a result of a Designated Give Up not accepting
the trade).
The ability for either a Designated Give Up or Guarantor to make
these changes shall end at the T+1 Cutoff Time. The Exchange notes that
that the T+1 Cutoff Time is 12:00 p.m. (CT) to provide finality and
certainty as to which Clearing Participant will be the Clearing
Participant for the trade.
Once the change to the Give Up has been made, the Designated Give
Up or Guarantor making the change must immediately thereafter notify
the Exchange, the parties to the trade and the New Clearing Participant
of the change in writing. The Exchange notes that the T+1 procedure is
not applicable to trades in expiring options series that take place on
the last trading day prior to their expiration. Rather, a Designated
Give Up and Guarantor may only reject these transactions on the trade
date until the Trade Date Cutoff Time in accordance with the trade date
procedures described above.
As discussed above, the Exchange is allowing Participant s [sic]
that are not Market-Makers to identify any Clearing Participant as a
Designated Give Up. Also as discussed, the Exchange has determined not
to take instructions from a Clearing Participant not to permit a
particular Participant from giving up their name so that the Exchange
will not be placed in the position of arbiter between a Clearing
Participant, a Participant and a customer. The Exchange recognizes,
however, that Participants should not be given the ability to give up
any Clearing Participant without also providing a method of recourse to
those Clearing Participants which, for the prescribed reasons discussed
above, should not be obligated to clear certain trades for which they
are given up. The Exchange accordingly is seeking to provide Designated
Give Ups and Guarantors the ability to, where appropriate, reject a
trade. Ultimately, however, the trade must clear with a clearing firm
and there must be finality to the trade. The Exchange believes that the
executing Participant's Guarantor, absent a Clearing Participant that
agrees to accept the trade, should become the Give Up on any trade
which a Designated Give Up determines to reject in accordance with
these proposed rule provisions, because the Guarantor, by virtue of
having issued a Letter of Guarantee or Authorization, has already
accepted financial responsibility for all Exchange transactions made by
the executing Participant. The Exchange
[[Page 8639]]
however, does not want to prevent a Clearing Participant that agrees to
accept the trade from being able to do so, and accordingly, the
Exchange also provides that a New Clearing Participant may become the
Give Up on a trade in accordance with the procedure discussed above.
Other Give Up Changes
The Exchange seeks to codify in its proposed rule three scenarios
in which a Give Up on a transaction may be changed without Exchange
involvement. First, if an executing Participant has the ability through
an Exchange system to do so, it may change the Give Up on a trade to
another Designated Give Up or its Guarantor. The Exchange notes that
Participants often make these changes when, for example, there was a
keypunch error (i.e. an error that involves the erroneous entry of an
intended clearing firm's OCC clearing number). The ability of the
executing Participant to make any such change will end at the Trade
Date Cutoff Time.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ After that time, the Participant will no longer have the
ability to make this type of change as the trade will have been
submitted to OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, the proposed rule provides that, if a Designated Give Up has
the ability to do so, it may change the Give Up on a transaction for
which it was given up to (i) another Clearing Participant affiliated
with the Designated Give Up or (ii) a Clearing Participant that is a
back office agent for the Designated Give Up. The ability to make such
a change will end at the Trade Date Cutoff Time. The procedures in
proposed subparagraph (f) of Rule 6.30 that were previously described
will not apply in these instances. The Exchange notes that often
Clearing Participants themselves have the ability to change a Give Up
on a trade for which it was given up to another Clearing Participant
affiliate or Clearing Participant for which the Designated Give Up is a
back office agent. Therefore, Exchange involvement in these instances
is not necessary.
Lastly, the proposed rule provides that if both a Designated Give
Up and a Clearing Participant have the ability through an Exchange
system to do so, the Designated Give Up and Clearing Participant may
each enter trade records into the Exchange's systems on T+1 that would
effect a transfer of the trade in a non-expired option series from that
Designated Give Up to that Clearing Participant. Likewise, if a
Guarantor of a Participant trade that is not a Market-Maker trade and a
Clearing Participant have the ability through an Exchange system to do
so, the Guarantor and Clearing Participant may each enter trade records
into the Exchange's systems on T+1 that would effect a transfer of the
trade in a non-expired option series from that Guarantor to that
Clearing Participant. The Designated Give Up or Guarantor shall not
make any such change after the T+1 Cutoff Time. The Exchange notes that
a Designated Give Up (or Guarantor) must notify, in writing, the
Exchange and all the parties to the trade, of any such change made
pursuant to this provision. This notification alerts the parties and
the Exchange that a change to the Give Up has been made. Finally, the
Designated Give Up (or Guarantor) will be responsible for monitoring
the trade and ensuring that the other Clearing Participant has entered
its side of the transaction timely and correctly. If either a
Designated Give Up (or Guarantor) or Clearing Participant cannot
themselves enter trade records into the Exchange's systems to effect a
transfer of the trade from one to the other, the Designated Give Up (or
Guarantor) may request the ability from the Exchange to enter both
sides of the transaction in accordance with this amended Rule 6.30 and
pursuant to the procedures set forth in subparagraph (f)(iii) of that
Rule.
Responsibility
For purposes of the Rules of the Exchange, a Clearing Participant
will be financially responsible for all trades for which it is the Give
Up at the Applicable Cutoff Time (for purposes of the proposed rule,
the ``Applicable Cutoff Time'' shall refer to the T+1 Cutoff Time for
non-expiring option series and to the Trade Date Cutoff Time for
expiring option series). The Exchange notes however, that nothing in
the proposed rule shall preclude a different party from being
responsible for the trade outside of the Rules of the Exchange pursuant
to OCC Rules, any agreement between the applicable parties, other
applicable rules and regulations, arbitration, court proceedings or
otherwise. Moreover, in processing a request to provide a Designated
Give Up the ability to change a Give Up on a trade, the Exchange will
not consider or validate whether the Designated Give Up has satisfied
the requirements of this Rule in relation to having a good faith belief
that it has a valid reason not to accept a trade or having notified the
executing Participant and attempting to resolve the disputed Give Up
prior to changing the Give Up. Rather, upon request, the Exchange shall
always provide a Designated Give Up or Guarantor the ability to change
the give up or to reject a trade pursuant to the proposed rule so long
as the Designated Give Up or Guarantor, and New Clearing Participant if
applicable, have provided a completed Give Up Change Forms within the
prescribed time period. The Exchange notes that given the inherent time
constraints in making a change to a Give Up on a transaction, the
Exchange would not be able to adequately consider the above-mentioned
requirements and make a determination within the prescribed period of
time. Rather, the Exchange will examine trades for which a Give Up was
changed pursuant to subparagraphs (e) and (f) after the fact to ensure
that requirements set forth in amended Rule 6.30 were complied with.
Particularly, the Exchange notes that the Give Up Change Forms that
Designated Give Ups, Guarantors and New Clearing Participants must
submit, will help to ensure that the Exchange obtains, in a uniform
format, the information that it needs to monitor and regulate this rule
and these give up changes in particular. This information, for example,
will better allow the Exchange to determine whether the Designated Give
Up had a valid reason to reject the trade, as well as assist the
Exchange in cross checking and confirming that what the Designated Give
Up or Guarantor said it was going to do is what it actually did (e.g.,
check that the New Clearing Participant identified in the Give Up
Change Form was the Clearing Participant that actually was identified
on the trade as the Give Up). Additionally, the proposed rule does not
preclude these factors from being considered in a different forum
(e.g., court or arbitration) nor does it preclude any Clearing
Participant that violates any provision of amended Rule 6.30 from being
subject to discipline in accordance with Exchange rules.
The Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date of the
proposed rule change in a Regulatory Circular, to be published no later
than thirty (30) days following the date of filing. The implementation
date will be no later than ninety (90) days following publication of
the Regulatory Circular. The Exchange notes this additional time gives
Participants time to provide their lists of all Clearing Participants
that they would like to designate as ``Designated Give Ups'' and gives
the Exchange time to process those lists and configure its system
accordingly.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
[[Page 8640]]
``Act'') and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, detailing in the rules how Participants will give up
Clearing Participants and how Clearing Participants may ``reject'' a
trade provides transparency and operational certainty. The Exchange
believes additional transparency removes a potential impediment to, and
will contribute to perfecting, the mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, will protect investors
and the public interest. Moreover, the Exchange notes that amended Rule
6.30 requires standardized forms to be used in the designation of
Designated Give Ups to ensure a seamless administration of the Rule.
The Rule also requires that Clearing Participants submit standardized
forms when requesting the ability to reject a trade and that all
notifications relating to a change in Give Up are in writing. These
requirements will aid the Exchange's efforts to monitor and regulate
Participants and Clearing Participants as they relate to amended Rule
6.30 and changes in give ups, thereby protecting investors and the
public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that in evaluating its give up
rule provisions, it solicited feedback from a variety of market
participants. The Exchange believes that its proposed give up rule
strikes the right balance between the various views and interests
across the industry. For example, although the rule allows Participants
that are not Market-Makers to identify any Clearing Participant as a
Designated Give Up, it also provides that Clearing Participants will
receive notice of any Participant that has designated it as a
Designated Give Up and provides for a procedure for a Clearing
Participant to ``reject'' a trade in accordance with the Rules, both on
the trade date and T+1. The Exchange recognizes that Participants
should not be given the ability to give up any Clearing Participant
without also providing a method of recourse to those Clearing
Participants which, for the prescribed reasons discussed above, should
not be obligated to clear certain trades for which they are given up.
The Exchange believes that providing Designated Give Ups the ability to
reject a trade within a reasonable amount of time is consistent with
the Act as, pursuant to the proposed rule, the Designated Give Ups may
only do so if they have a valid reason and because ultimately, the
trade can always be assigned to the Guarantor of the executing
Participant. A trade must clear with a clearing firm and there must be
finality to the trade. The Exchange believes that the executing
Participant's Guarantor, absent a Clearing Participant that agrees to
accept the trade, should become the Give Up on any trade which a
Designated Give Up determines to reject in accordance with the proposed
rule provisions, because the Guarantor, by virtue of having issued a
Letter of Guarantee or Authorization, has already accepted financial
responsibility for all Exchange transactions made by the executing
Participant. Therefore, amended Rule 6.30 is reasonable and provides
certainty that a Clearing Participant will always be responsible for a
trade, which protects investors and the public interest.
Lastly, the Exchange notes that amended Rule 6.30 does not preclude
a different party than the party given up from being responsible for
the trade outside of the Rules of the Exchange pursuant to OCC Rules,
any agreement between the applicable parties, other applicable rules
and regulations, arbitration, court proceedings or otherwise. The
Exchange acknowledges that it will not consider whether the Designated
Give Up has satisfied the requirements of this Rule in relation to
having a good faith belief that it has a valid reason not to accept a
trade or having notified the executing Participant and attempting to
resolve the disputed Give Up prior to changing the Give Up, due to
inherent time restrictions. However, the Exchange believes investor and
public interest are still protected as the Exchange will still examine
trades for which a Give Up was changed pursuant to subparagraphs (e)
and (f) of amended Rule 6.30 after the fact to ensure that the
requirements set forth in the Rule were complied with. As noted above,
the use of standardized forms and the requirement that certain notices
be in writing will assist monitoring any give up changes and enforcing
amended Rule 6.30. Finally, the Exchange notes that the Rule does not
preclude these factors from being considered in a different forum
(e.g., court or arbitration) nor does it preclude any Participant or
Clearing Participant that violates any provision of amended Rule 6.30
from being subject to discipline by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will impose an unnecessary burden on
intramarket competition because it will apply equally to all similarly
situated Participants. The Exchange also notes that, should the
proposed changes make C2 more attractive for trading, market
participants trading on other exchanges can always elect to become
Participants on C2 to take advantage of the trading opportunities.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \11\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, Rule 19b-
[[Page 8641]]
4(f)(6)(iii) \13\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if
such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay so that it can implement the proposed rule
change as early as the last week in January. The Commission believes
that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission notes
that the Exchange's proposed rule change is based on a substantially
similar proposed rule change submitted by CBOE, which the Commission
approved after receiving no comments.\14\ The Commission also notes
that the filing raises no novel issues apart from those already
considered in the earlier CBOE filing. Therefore, the Commission waives
the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72668 (July 24,
2014), 79 FR 44229 (July 30, 2014) (SR-CBOE-2014-048).
\15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2017-004 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2017-004. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2017-004 and should be
submitted on or before February 17, 2017.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-01831 Filed 1-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P