Revision of FOIA Regulations, 7666-7680 [2017-00453]
Download as PDF
7666
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(Sec. 335, Pub. L. 114–113, 129 Stat. 3109, as
amended (26 U.S.C. 5041))
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
§ 24.332
Hard cider materials.
This section pertains to wine that is
eligible for the hard cider tax rate as set
out in § 24.331.
(a) Apples and pears. Wine will be
considered to be derived primarily from
apples or pears, or from apple juice
concentrate or pear juice concentrate
and water, if the apple juice, pear juice,
or combination of apple and pear juice,
or the equivalent amount of concentrate
of apple and/or pear juice reconstituted
to the original brix of the juice prior to
concentration, or any combination
thereof, represents more than 50 percent
of the volume of the finished product.
(b) Fruit products. (1) Wine is not
eligible for the hard cider tax rate if it
contains any fruit product other than
apple or pear. A fruit product is any
material derived or made from any fruit
or part of a fruit, including but not
limited to, concentrates, extracts, juices,
powders, or wine spirits.
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of
§ 24.332(b)(1), an authorized wine
treating material set forth in § 24.246
that is derived from a fruit other than
apple or pear may be used in the
production of wine otherwise eligible
for the hard cider tax rate if it is used
for a purpose other than flavoring and
it is either used in accordance with the
wine treating materials provisions of
§ 24.246 (if used in a natural wine), or
used in amounts insufficient to impart
a fruit flavor other than apple or pear (if
used in a special natural wine or other
than standard wine). In determining
whether the use of wine treating
materials derived from a fruit other than
apple or pear is for a purpose other than
flavoring, TTB will consider such
factors as the labeling and advertising of
the product. Any written or pictorial
reference to a material derived from a
fruit other than apple or pear (other than
the inclusion of a wine treating material
in an ingredient labeling statement) in
the labeling or advertising of a wine will
be treated as evidence that the wine
treating material was added for the
purpose of flavoring the wine.
(c) Flavorings. Wine is not eligible for
the hard cider tax rate if it contains any
fruit flavoring other than apple or pear.
For purposes of this section, a fruit
flavoring other than apple or pear is any
flavoring that imparts the flavor of a
fruit other than apple or pear and
includes a natural fruit flavor, an
artificial fruit flavor, and a natural flavor
that artificially imparts the flavor of a
fruit that is not contained in that flavor.
In determining whether the use of a
flavoring imparts the flavor of a fruit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
other than apple or pear, TTB will
consider such factors as the labeling and
advertising of the product. Any written
or pictorial reference to a fruit flavor
other than apple or pear in the labeling
or advertising of a wine that contains a
flavoring will be treated as evidence that
the wine contains a flavoring that
imparts a fruit flavor other than apple or
pear and thus the wine is not eligible for
the hard cider tax rate. The use of
spices, honey, hops, or pumpkins as a
flavoring will not make a wine ineligible
for the hard cider tax rate.
(Sec. 335, Pub. L. 114–113, 129 Stat. 3109, as
amended (26 U.S.C. 5041))
PART 27—IMPORTATION OF
DISTILLED SPIRITS, WINES, AND
BEER
24. The authority citation for part 27
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 19 U.S.C. 81c,
1202; 26 U.S.C. 5001, 5007, 5008, 5010, 5041,
5051, 5054, 5061, 5121, 5122–5124, 5201,
5205, 5207, 5232, 5273, 5301, 5313, 5382,
5555, 6109, 7805.
25. Section 27.11 is amended by
adding the definition of ‘‘Hard cider’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
§ 27.11
Meaning of terms.
*
*
*
*
*
Hard cider. A wine that meets the
eligibility requirements set forth in
§ 24.331 for the hard cider tax rate set
forth in § 24.270.
*
*
*
*
*
26. Section 27.59 is revised by:
■ a. Designating the current paragraph
as paragraph (a);
■ b. Adding a paragraph heading to
newly designated paragraph (a);
■ c. Adding paragraph (b); and
■ d. Adding an Office of Management
and Budget control number reference.
The designation and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 27.59
Wines.
(a) General. * * *
(b) Hard cider. The container of any
wine eligible for the ‘‘hard cider’’ tax
class set forth in § 24.270 of this chapter
must be labeled in accordance with the
requirements applicable to wine
containers removed from wine premises
under § 24.257(a)(4) of this chapter. (See
§ 24.331 of this chapter for the eligibility
requirements for the hard cider tax rate).
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 1513–XXXX)
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Signed: December 7, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: January 4, 2017.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2017–00333 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
29 CFR Part 70
RIN 1290–AA30
Revision of FOIA Regulations
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Department of Labor’s regulations under
the Freedom of Information Act
(‘‘FOIA’’). The regulations have been
revised to update and streamline the
language of several procedural
provisions and to incorporate changes
brought about by the amendments to the
FOIA under the OPEN Government Act
of 2007 and the FOIA Improvement Act
of 2016. Additionally, the regulations
have been updated to incorporate
changes in the agency’s administrative
structure.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ramona Branch Oliver, Director, Office
of Information Services, 202–693–5391
(this is not a toll free number) or 1–877–
889–5627 (TTY). Individuals with
hearing or speech impairments may
access the telephone number above via
TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at (800) 877–
8839.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
17, 2016, the Department of Labor
published a Notice of Proposed Rule
Making (NPRM) to revise its existing
regulations under the FOIA found at 29
CFR part 70, to update and streamline
the language of several procedural
provisions and to incorporate changes
brought about by the amendments to the
FOIA under the OPEN Government Act
of 2007, Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat.
2524, and the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016, Public Law 114–185, 130 Stat. 538
(enacted June 30, 2016). The
Department invited comments through
October 17, 2016.
Discussion of Comments: Preparation
of the NPRM and this finalization of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Department’s updated FOIA regulation
satisfied the requirement in Section 3 of
the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 that
each agency review and revise its FOIA
regulation to be consistent with the
statutory requirements.
Interested persons were afforded the
opportunity to participate in the
rulemaking process through submission
of written comments to the proposed
rule during the open comment period.
In total, the Department received six
submissions in response to its proposed
rule, including comments from two
Federal agencies, as well as internal
comments from a component of the
Department. Due consideration has been
given to each of the comments received
and, in response, the Department has
made several modifications to the rule.
These modifications include clarifying,
revising, or expanding various
provisions, withdrawing a provision,
retaining existing language for certain
other provisions, and making technical
edits, such as correcting Web site links.
Discussion of each of the comments,
and the Departments response follows:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Section 70.2 Definitions
One commenter expressed concern
that the use of the phrase ‘‘or financial’’
is superfluous in the first clause of
subsection § 70.2(j) (defining submitter),
because that phrase is already included
in the definition of ‘‘confidential
commercial information’’ in subsection
(b). The Department has determined that
including ‘‘or financial’’ is helpful in
identifying different types of
information. As such, DOL declines to
make the requested change.
One commenter suggested that the
definition of ‘‘unusual circumstances’’
in § 70.2(k)(3) should state that
consultation could occur ‘‘. . . with
another agency or among two or more
components of the Department having a
substantial interest in the determination
of the request.’’ The Department agrees
that the proposed change will enhance
the rule’s clarity, and so the revised
final rule adopts this proposed
language.
Section 70.3 Policy
One commenter suggested changing
the title of § 70.3 from ‘‘Policy’’ to
‘‘Presumption of Openness,’’ because,
following the June 2016 statutory
amendments to FOIA, this section
addresses not a matter of policy, but of
law. The Department agrees with this
comment. The final rule modifies this
section to be titled, ‘‘Presumption of
Openness.’’
One commenter suggested that the
regulation does not include the use of
exclusions and that if DOL would have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
any opportunity to use an exclusion,
they should be addressed. The
Department agrees with this comment
and has incorporated by reference the
law enforcement exclusions in
subsection (c) of the FOIA at §§ 70.3 and
70.20(b).
Section 70.4 Proactive Disclosure of
Departmental Records
One commenter noted that the
Department makes many (a)(2) proactive
disclosures by posting materials on DOL
Web sites other than the Department’s
specific FOIA Web site pages, for which
a URL was included in this section of
the NPRM. Accordingly, the commenter
suggested removing a specific link to the
Department’s FOIA Web page and
instead stating more generally that
records may be accessed through the
Department’s Web site. The Department
agrees with the comment, and the final
rule has been revised to remove the
specific URL.
Section 70.19 Requirements for
Making a Request
Three commenters expressed concern
regarding DOL’s decision to continue to
have a single central email box for the
receipt of FOIA requests, and raised a
number of points regarding whether this
creates inefficiencies in DOL’s FOIA
processing. Specifically, § 70.19(a) of
the NPRM states, consistent with the
Department’s existing FOIA regulation
at 29 CFR 70.19(b), that any FOIA
request submitted electronically, by
email, must be submitted to a single
email address.
One commenter requested that DOL
clarify that even though DOL’s FOIA
program is decentralized, DOL will
receive all electronic submission to one
inbox and that each request will then be
sent to the appropriate component for
processing. That same commenter
expressed concern that the NPRM
language regarding a central email inbox
may be in conflict with the NPRM at
§ 70.19(b), which states that requesters
should submit their request directly to
the component that maintains the
records sought. The same commenter
suggested that if DOL has a single email
address for electronic submissions, it
should make clear that the requester
must designate the component to which
the request is directed. One of the
commenters sought to confirm that
requests submitted electronically are not
automatically subject to the ‘‘routing’’
provision, under which the time
processing clock does not begin until a
request is received in the proper
component or until ten days after
receipt anywhere in the Department.
This same commenter flagged that
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7667
§ 70.19(b)(2) of the NPRM provides that
requesters who do not know where to
submit their request can email it to the
same central email address indicated for
all requests submitted electronically in
(a), and that ‘‘routing’’ procedures might
then apply. The same commenter asked
how DOL will know which requests
need to be ‘‘routed’’ vs. those that are
just being submitted electronically to a
particular component. The commenter
also stated that when requesters indicate
the component (or components if they
are submitting to more than one), it does
not seem appropriate for DOL to ‘‘route’’
these requests because this is the only
way they may be submitted
electronically. The commenter asked
whether DOL considered establishing
email addresses to receive electronic
submissions for all components. The
commenter noted that this approach
would seem to allow requests to get
where they need to go more efficiently.
DOL has considered these comments
and—for the reasons explained below—
has determined that DOL’s FOIA
program can be administered most
effectively with a single central email
inbox for receipt of FOIA requests, but
that some clarification to the regulatory
text of § 70.19 can be made to explain
DOL’s process and address the
commenters’ concerns. DOL has
established an effective method to
receive and assign incoming FOIA
requests received by email. DOL has
established a single centralized FOIA
mailbox, which is actively monitored by
staff within the Department’s central
FOIA office, the Office of Information
Services. Staff who monitor the FOIA
mailbox are responsible for ensuring
that FOIA requests are appropriately
directed to the agency component(s)
identified by the requester or to the
appropriate component(s) in instances
where the requester has failed to
identify a component or has identified
the wrong component. Receipt in the
central FOIA email inbox does not
automatically add 10 additional days for
‘‘routing,’’ rather, the Department has
established an operational performance
measure that tracks whether requests are
routed to the agency component(s)
likely to maintain responsive records
within two business days of receipt. By
having a centralized FOIA email inbox
monitored by FOIA staff, the
Department has ensured that FOIA
requests are not received at email
addresses that are not regularly
monitored, or sent to DOL staff who are
not involved in FOIA processing and
may not know what to do with an
incoming FOIA request.
For these reasons, the Department has
determined to retain the concept of a
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
7668
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
central incoming FOIA email inbox.
However, DOL has modified the
language of § 70.19(a) in several ways to
increase public clarity and promote
efficient logging and assignment of
incoming FOIA requests. The final text
adds language to § 70.19(a) and (b)
further explaining the Department’s
process, and indicating that requesters
should, when emailing in requests,
identify the component or components
to which they are submitting their FOIA
request in order to facilitate the timely
assignment and processing of their
request. The final rule also seeks to
clarify the circumstances under which
the time to respond begins to run, by
moving the last clause of § 70.19(b)(2)
from the NPRM into a separate
provision at § 70.19(b)(3), and clarifying
that if a requester submits a FOIA
request to the incorrect DOL FOIA
component, or sends a request to the
Department’s central FOIA office or
mailbox without identifying the
component(s) to which the request is
submitted, the time to respond begins to
run when the request is received by the
proper component, but no later than 10
working days after receipt in any
component identified in Appendix A or
in the Office of Information Services.
One commenter raised a concern that
the language in the NPRM at
§ 70.19(d)(3) is overly broad regarding
when the processing of a FOIA request
can be tolled. The commenter suggested
that the rule track the language of the
statute more closely to indicate a
request can be tolled only once if the
agency is seeking clarification from the
requester about their request. The
Department concurs, and in response to
this comment, the final rule has been
modified to read, ‘‘While an agency
component awaits a requester’s
modified FOIA request, the processing
time limits described in Sec. 70.25(a)(1)
will be tolled (that is, the processing
time clock will be stopped on one
occasion only) until clarification is
received from the requester.’’
Section 70.20 Responsibility for
Responding to Requests
One commenter raised concerns with
the provision at § 70.20(a) providing
that the Department’s Office of
Information Services may coordinate
responses when ‘‘it is determined that
records responsive to a request may be
located in multiple components of the
Department.’’ The commenter suggested
that this provision might add an
obligation beyond the requirements of
the FOIA, for example, requiring one
component to conduct searches at those
other components and process those
records.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
The Department disagrees that this
provision, which is not a procedural
change from the existing regulation,
creates new or additional
responsibilities. This provision does not
mandate that OIS coordinate responses,
or that one component undertake
searches of other components’ records.
Rather this provision recognizes that
there may be circumstances where
similar or the same documents are
maintained by multiple components of
the Department, and it is appropriate to
coordinate search, review and response,
for example, through use of coordinated
search terms. Although DOL’s FOIA
program is decentralized, it remains one
agency and seeks to speak in one voice
on matters of disclosure of documents
that may be duplicative or have
overlapping equities across the agency.
In addition, this comment raises a
policy question related to how DOL
structures its FOIA operation, and the
Department has determined that it will
continue its present program
administration and flexibility in the
operation of the Department’s FOIA
program. Accordingly, the final rule
adopts the provision as proposed.
Regarding the provisions at § 70.20(d)
related to consultations and referrals,
one commenter suggested that the first
sentence should be edited to clarify that
consults and referrals are only
appropriate when a component has
actually located records. The
Department agrees that the language
could more clearly identify when
consultations and referrals are
appropriate and, therefore, the
Department is making the following
change in the final rule: ‘‘Consultations
and referrals. When a component is
reviewing records in response to a
request, it will determine if another
component of the Department, or of the
Federal Government, is better able to
determine whether the record can be
disclosed or is exempt from disclosure
under the FOIA.’’
Also, in reference to § 70.20(d), one
commenter suggested that the language
be altered because, as written, it does
not authorize the Department to consult
with the Office of White House Counsel,
which is neither an ‘‘agency’’ nor a
Department component. The
Department does not believe a revision
is necessary because the regulatory
language recognizes that consultation or
referral may occur with ‘‘another
component . . . of the Federal
Government.’’ The Department believes
that this adequately covers instances
where DOL might need to consult with
the Office of White House Counsel.
One commenter suggested that § 70.20
should include language on
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘coordination’’ to cover situations
where referring records may not be
appropriate, and gave as an example
instances where a referral would reveal
classified information. The Department
does not believe this change is
necessary, as the Department does not
have original classification authority
pursuant to the prevailing executive
order on national security classification
and, likewise, does not have the
authority to downgrade or declassify
documents.
Section 70.21 Responses to Requests
One commenter suggested that
§ 70.21(b) should require the
Department’s acknowledgement letter to
indicate the date of receipt of the
request. The Department declines to
make this change as it is beyond the
scope of the current statutory
requirement. It is also unnecessary to
DOL’s FOIA program because
Departmental policy is that
acknowledgment letters should provide
requesters with a link to the public
FOIA portal, which provides the
requester with the date of receipt. The
final rule adopts the provision as
proposed.
One commenter suggested that
§ 70.21(c) should be revised to add that
written communications notifying a
requester of the grant of a request will
include notice of the availability of the
FOIA Public Liaison, as required by the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. The
Department concurs and has modified
this provision in the final rule to read,
‘‘The component must notify the
requester of the right to seek assistance
from the Department’s FOIA Public
Liaison.’’
One commenter suggested that the
wording of § 70.21(e)(5) of the NPRM,
regarding the ‘‘Content of the denial,’’
incorrectly implies that ‘‘adverse
determination’’ and ‘‘denial’’ are
different in kind, and suggested
combining the subparts of (5) into (e).
The commenter stated that any denial is
an adverse determination and must
include notification of appeal rights as
well as the availability of OGIS and the
FOIA Public Liaison. The Department
concurs that the language of
§ 70.21(e)(5) in the NPRM potentially
led to confusion. In response to this
comment, the Department has combined
subsections (4) and (5) of this provision
in the final rule.
The Final Rule includes a new
provision of Section 70.21(e)(5) that
states ‘‘Engaging in dispute resolution
services provided by OGIS is a
voluntary process. If the Department
agrees to participate in the mediation
services provided by OGIS, it will
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
actively engage as a partner to the
process in an attempt to resolve the
dispute.’’ This change is in response to
a comment received on Section 70.22.
Section 70.22 Appeals From Denials
of Requests
The NPRM at Sec. 70.22(a) identified
as one circumstance in which a FOIA
requester could file an appeal ‘‘a
component’s failure to respond to the
request within the time limits.’’ One
commenter objected to this language on
grounds that there is no response to
appeal when the DOL component to
which a FOIA request was submitted
has not provided a timely response, and
that a requester does not need to
administratively appeal in order to
exhaust administrative remedies. The
Department declines to remove the
reference to ‘‘a component’s failure to
respond to the request within the time
limits’’ as an example of a circumstance
that may prompt an administrative
appeal because many requesters are not
inclined to seek judicial review on the
basis of a delayed response to a pending
FOIA request and would rather seek to
obtain disclosure of information through
the administrative appeals process.
Although a requester does not have to
exhaust his or her administrative
remedies on timeliness issues where no
initial response has been provided, the
Department believes that the better
practice under FOIA is to continue to
make an administrative appeal available
to requesters, and that eliminating this
option may result in requesters
believing that litigation is necessary
when an administrative process may
more quickly and cost effectively
address the requester’s concern.
One commenter raised a concern with
the wording of § 70.22(a) in that it does
not identify the ability of a requester to
appeal from a failure of the Department
to respond in a timely manner to a
request for expedited processing, or to
appeal in the event that the Department
refuses to provide responsive records in
a requested format. As Sec. 70.21
provides, a FOIA requester may file an
administrative appeal in response to any
denial or adverse determination. Section
70.22(a) provides examples of when a
requester may seek a de novo review
through the Department’s FOIA
administrative appeal process, but the
list is not intended to be an exhaustive
identification of the bases for appeal. To
assist the public, the Department has
revised this provision in the final rule
to make clear that it provides examples
rather than an exhaustive list.
One commenter suggested that using
the word ‘‘must’’ in the second sentence
of § 70.22(b) regarding items to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
provided along with a FOIA appeal
creates an administrative hurdle that is
counter to the spirit of FOIA. The
Department agrees with this comment
and has modified the language in the
final rule to replace the word ‘‘must’’
with ‘‘should.’’
One commenter suggested adding
language about engaging with OGIS
somewhere in § 70.22 or its own section
to satisfy the requirement of the FOIA
Improvement Act that agency FOIA
regulations include procedures for
engaging with OGIS. The commenter
suggested including the following
language in the Final Rule: ‘‘Engaging in
dispute resolution services provided by
OGIS. Mediation is a voluntary process.
If an agency agrees to participate in the
mediation services provided by OGIS, it
will actively engage as a partner to the
process in an attempt to resolve the
dispute.’’ In response to this comment,
the Department has included language
in Section 70.21(e)(5), which it believes
is a more appropriate place for this
language. The new provision of Section
70.21(e)(5) states ‘‘Engaging in dispute
resolution services provided by OGIS is
a voluntary process. If the Department
agrees to participate in the mediation
services provided by OGIS, it will
actively engage as a partner to the
process in an attempt to resolve the
dispute.’’
Section 70.24 Form and Content of
Action on Appeals
One commenter suggested that in the
third sentence, ‘‘Consistent with the
statute’’ should be removed, noting that
the Freedom of Information Act, as
amended, does not require notification
about services provided by OGIS in
appeals letters, but rather that any such
inclusion is based on guidance from the
Office of Information Policy. In response
to this comment, the Department has
modified the language in the final rule
and removed the phrase ‘‘consistent
with the statute’’ from this provision.
Section 70.25 Time Limits and Order
in Which Requests and Appeals Must
Be Processed
One commenter suggested that
§ 70.25(a) should note that the routing of
requests may impact timing. The
commenter recommended adding the
following language, ‘‘In instances
involving misdirected requests that are
re-routed pursuant to § 70.20(c) of this
subpart, the response time will
commence on the date that the request
is received by the proper component’s
office that is designated to receive
requests, but in any event not later than
10 working days after the request is first
received by any component’s office that
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7669
is designated by these regulations to
receive requests.’’ The Department
agrees with this comment and has
added the suggested language to the
final rule.
One commenter suggested removing
the clause ‘‘unless there are exceptional
circumstances within the meaning of 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C)’’ from § 70.25(a) and
noted that only a court can make a
determination that there are exceptional
circumstances. The Department agrees
with this comment, and has removed
this provision from the final rule.
In relation to § 70.25(c)(1), one
commenter suggested that, as a practical
matter and looking at agency response
times, agencies tend to need more than
ten additional days when there are
unusual circumstances requiring
extension of processing times. The
commenter suggested that the language
stating ‘‘this extension should not
ordinarily exceed ten business days’’ be
removed. The Department agrees with
this comment, and has removed this
phrase from the final rule.
One commenter suggested that the
Department was creating an
unnecessary administrative burden by
requiring in § 70.25(e)(3) that a person
seeking expedited processing as a
member of the media establish that ‘‘he
or she is a person whose main
professional activity or occupation is
information dissemination . . .’’
Consistent with administrative
guidance, the Department believes that
to meet the standard for expedited
processing under the FOIA statute (see
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(II)) a requester
who is not a full-time member of the
news media must establish that he or
she is a person whose primary
professional activity or occupation is
information dissemination, though it
need not be the requester’s sole
occupation. DOL does not believe that
requiring the requester to meet the
statutory standard is unnecessarily
burdensome. Therefore, the final rule
adopts the provision as proposed in the
NPRM.
Section 70.26 Confidential
Commercial Information
One commenter recommended that
Executive Order 12,600 be cited
consistently in §§ 70.26(a) and (g)(3).
The Department agrees with this
comment and has edited these sections
for consistency in the final rule.
One commenter suggested that
§ 70.26(e) and (f)(3) should be modified
to provide that the ‘‘reasonable period’’
that a submitter has to object to the
agency’s proposed treatment of the
submitter’s material will be at least five
business days from the date that the
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
7670
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
submitter receives the agency’s notice.
The Department declines to make this
change. The NPRM provision at
§ 70.26(e) indicates that a submitter will
be provided with a ‘‘reasonable time to
respond’’ to a notice from the agency,
but also notes that the response date
will be specified in the submitter’s
notice provided in accordance with
Executive Order 12,600. Furthermore,
the time provided to a submitter for
responding is based upon the volume
and complexity of the materials
requested. Section 70.26(f)(3) does not
discuss response time periods. The final
rule adopts both provisions as proposed.
Section 70.38 Definitions Related to
Costs
One commenter suggested a change to
§ 70.38(a), which states that ‘‘request’’ in
the costs subpart includes any request
and any appeal. The commenter
suggested removing the reference to the
FOIA appeal stage on grounds that no
fees are assessed on appeal, noting that
while a request may be remanded on
appeal for further processing, any
subsequent fees apply to the underlying
request, not the appeal. The Department
agrees with this comment, and the final
rule removes references to FOIA
appeals.
Regarding § 70.38(c), one commenter
suggested using the term ‘‘duplication’’
throughout instead of ‘‘reproduction’’ in
order to be consistent with the FOIA
statute, which states that fees shall be
limited to search, duplication, and
review, and OMB guidelines. The
Department agrees with this comment
and has modified the final rule to use
the term ‘‘duplication.’’
Three commenters made suggestions
related to the definition of educational
institutions for cost purposes in the
NPRM at § 70.38(g)(2). The commenters
suggested that this provision should
reflect and adopt the holding of Sack v.
Department of Defense, 823 F.3d 687
(D.C. Cir. 2016), which found that
students may qualify as educational
institution requesters in some
circumstances. In response to these
comments and to retain flexibility to
determine a student’s eligibility for a fee
waiver based on any future judicial
interpretations or guidance issued by
Department of Justice, the Department
has removed the following sentence
from the final rule, ‘‘A request from a
student enrolled in an individual course
of study at an education institution
would not qualify as a request from the
institution.’’
Regarding the definition of
‘‘representative of the news media’’ in
the NPRM at § 70.38(i)(3), one
commenter asked that DOL remove two
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
uses of the word ‘‘qualifying’’ from the
phrase ‘‘qualifying news media entity’’
because inclusion of the word
‘‘qualifying’’ gives the impression that a
news media entity must meet some
separate or additional qualification
standard. The commenter suggested that
the phrase ‘‘news media entity’’ is
sufficient. The Department agrees with
this comment. The final rule removes
the word ‘‘qualifying’’ from this
provision.
70.40 Charges Assessed for the
Production of Records
Two commenters noted that, in
§ 70.40(c) and (d), DOL has identified
four types of requesters for fee purposes,
and suggested that these groups could
be combined into three. The Department
has determined that identifying four
types of requesters is helpful to
distinguish between different types of
requesters that communicate with the
Department. As such, the Department
declines to make the change requested,
and the final rule adopts the provision
as proposed.
One commenter noted that
§ 70.40(e)(1)(iii) of the NPRM states that
if a search requires transportation of the
searcher to the location of the records,
or of the records to the searcher, all
transportation costs in excess of $5 may
be added to search costs. The
commenter raised questions about this
provision and whether it was an
appropriate cost to pass on to the
requester. In response to the comments
received, the Department is removing
this provision from the final rule as
unnecessary. The Department notes that
this provision has been in effect since
2006 when the DOL last published its
FOIA regulations (see 71 FR 30762), but
is not aware of any instance in which
such costs have been assessed.
One commenter noted that
§ 70.40(e)(2) of the NPRM states that a
FOIA component may require the
requester to provide any medium
requested other than paper. The
commenter raised questions about this
provision and whether it was an
appropriate burden to pass on to the
requester. In response, the Department
is removing this provision from the final
rule as unnecessary. The Department
notes that this provision has been in
effect since 2006 when DOL last
published its FOIA regulations (see 71
FR 30762), but is not aware of any
instances where this provision was
applied.
One commenter asked if DOL has
evaluated the actual cost of reproducing
paper copies identified in § 70.40(e)(2)
(FOIA requests) and 70.53(c) (requests
for documents from the Office of Labor-
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Management Standards). The
commenter suggested that, with the use
of commercial vendors, actual costs are
likely close to 5 or 10 cents per page,
rather than the 15 cent per page costs
included in the NPRM. DOL notes that
it does not typically use commercial
vendors to help fulfill requests for
paper-based records in response to
FOIA requests, and therefore that
comparison may not be applicable here.
Furthermore, as the NPRM states,
reproduction cost also reflects the time
associated with reproducing the
documents being provided.
Accordingly, DOL declines to make a
change to the cost of the duplication of
paper-based records. The final rule
adopts the provision as proposed.
Regarding the NPRM provisions
regarding limitations on fee charges, one
commenter suggested that
§ 70.40(e)(4)(i) should use language that
more closely matches the statutory
language. The commenter suggested that
section (4) should note what the
‘‘certain fees’’ are, and suggested, that,
as written, this provision does not
account for the possibility of the
exception in § 70.40(e)(4)(ii).
Additionally, the commenter suggested
that § 70.40(e)(4)(ii) should be edited to
state ‘‘and more than 5,000 pages are
necessary to respond to the request,’’
noting that ‘‘deemed to be responsive’’
is potentially more restrictive. The
Department agrees that this comment
has identified some potentially
confusing language, and has accordingly
modified § 70.40(e)(4) to incorporate the
recommended change.
In addition to the changes made as a
result of specific comments and
Departmental feedback, this final rule
includes changes already identified in
the NRPM (see 81 FR 54770) to include
changes in language and structure of the
existing regulation and to codify
changes based on the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016. As an
additional administrative update, the
Department is also making a change to
§ 70.27 (Preservation of records) to
update the National Archives and
Records Administration’s General
Records Schedule which governs the
disposition of FOIA case files and
related records from GRS 14 to GRS 4.2:
Information Access and Protection
Records.
Regulatory Flexibility Act: The
Secretary of Labor, in accordance with
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), has reviewed this regulation
and by approving it certifies that this
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Under the
FOIA, agencies may recover only the
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
direct costs of searching for, reviewing,
and duplicating the records processed
for requesters, and only for certain
classes of requester and when particular
conditions are satisfied. Thus, fees
assessed by the Department are
nominal. Further, the ‘‘small entities’’
that make FOIA requests, as compared
with individual requesters and other
requesters, are relatively few in number.
Executive Order 12,866: This
regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12,866, § 1(b), Principles of
Regulation. The Office of Management
and Budget has determined that this
rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12,866,
§ 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review,
and accordingly this rule has not been
reviewed by OMB.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995: This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1995: This
rule is not a major rule as defined by
section 251 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (as amended), 5 U.S.C. 804. This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 70
Administrative Practice and
Procedure; Freedom of Information Act;
Privacy.
■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department of Labor revises 29 CFR
part 70 to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
PART 70—PRODUCTION OR
DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION OR
MATERIALS
Subpart A—General
Sec.
70.1 General provisions.
70.2 Definitions.
70.3 Presumption of openness.
70.4 Proactive disclosure of Departmental
records.
70.5 Compilation of new records.
70.6 Disclosure of originals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
70.7–70.18
[Reserved]
Subpart B—Procedures for Disclosure of
Records Under the Freedom of Information
Act
70.19 Requirements for making a request.
70.20 Responsibility for responding to
requests.
70.21 Responses to requests.
70.22 Appeals from denial of requests.
70.23 Action on appeals.
70.24 Form and content of action on
appeals.
70.25 Time limits and order in which
requests and appeals must be processed.
70.26 Confidential commercial information.
70.27 Preservation of records.
70.28–70.37 [Reserved]
Subpart C—Costs for Production of
Records
70.38 Definitions related to costs.
70.39 Statutes specifically providing for
setting of fees.
70.40 Charges assessed for the production
of records.
70.41 Waiver or reduction of fees.
70.42 Consent to pay fees.
70.43 Payment of fees.
70.44 Other rights and services.
70.45–70.52 [Reserved]
Subpart D—Public Records and Filings
70.53 Office of Labor-Management
Standards.
70.54 Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
Appendix A to Part 70—FOIA Components
Appendix B to Part 70—[Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 29 U.S.C. 551 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended;
Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950, 5 U.S.C.
Appendix, 29 U.S.C. 1026 (106), 5 U.S.C.
app. 11., Executive Order. 12,600, 52 FR
23781, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235. This part
also implements the public information
provisions of the Labor-Management
Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29
U.S.C. 435, see § 70.53 below; the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1026 (106), see § 70.54
below; and the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. app. 11, see § 70.40(i)
below.
Subpart A—General
§ 70.1
General provisions.
(a) This part is organized as follows:
Subpart A contains general information
about Department of Labor policies and
procedures; subpart B sets forth the
procedures for obtaining access to
records of the Department; subpart C
contains the Department’s regulations
on fees; and subpart D sets forth the
procedures for obtaining access to
certain public records. Appendix A
contains a list of all Department of
Labor FOIA components from which
records may be obtained.
(b) This part contains the rules that
the Department of Labor follows in
processing requests for records under
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7671
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552. The rules in
this part should be read together with
the text of the FOIA, which provides
additional information about access to
records maintained by the Department.
Additionally, the Department’s ‘‘Guide
to Submitting Requests under the FOIA’’
and related documents contain helpful
information about the specific
procedures particular to the Department
with respect to making FOIA requests,
and descriptions of the types of records
maintained by different components of
the Department. These references are
available at https://www.dol.gov/dol/
foia/guide6.html.
(c) Requests made by individuals for
records about themselves under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are
processed under 29 CFR part 71 as well
as under this part. Information routinely
provided to the public as part of a
regular Department activity (for
example, press releases issued by the
Office of Public Affairs (OPA)) may be
provided to the public without
following this subpart.
(d) As set forth in § 70.3 of this part,
the Department operates its FOIA
program with a presumption of
openness and withholds records or
information under the FOIA only when
the Department reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by a FOIA exemption or when
disclosure is prohibited by law.
(e) The Department has a
decentralized system for processing
requests, with each component handling
requests for its own records. Each
component has a FOIA Customer
Service Center that can assist
individuals in locating records and
address questions regarding pending
FOIA requests. A list of the
Department’s Customer Service Centers
is available at https://www.dol.gov/dol/
foia/RequestorServiceCenters.htm.
(f) The Secretary has designated a
Chief FOIA Officer for the Department.
Contact information for the Chief FOIA
Officer is available on the Department’s
FOIA Web site, https://www.dol.gov/dol/
foia/. The Office of Information Services
(OIS), which is located within the Office
of the Solicitor, provides Department
level guidance and oversight for the
Department’s FOIA program and
supports the statutorily-based
responsibilities of the DOL Chief FOIA
Officer.
(g) The Department has a designated
FOIA Public Liaison who can assist
individuals in locating records of a
particular component and with
resolving issues relating to the
processing of a pending FOIA request.
Information concerning the DOL FOIA
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
7672
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Public Liaison is available at https://
www.dol.gov/sol/foia/liaison.htm. The
DOL FOIA Public Liaison is responsible
for assisting in reducing delays in FOIA
processing, increasing transparency and
understanding, providing information
concerning the status of requests, and
assisting in the resolution of disputes.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
§ 70.2
Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) The terms agency, person, party,
rule, order, and adjudication have the
meaning attributed to these terms by the
definitions in 5 U.S.C. 551.
(b) Confidential commercial
information means commercial or
financial information received or
obtained by the Department from a
submitter, directly or indirectly, that
arguably may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the
FOIA.
(c) The Department means the
Department of Labor.
(d) FOIA Component means an
official component of the Department
that has authority to disclose or
withhold records under the FOIA and to
which requests to inspect or copy
records in its custody should be
addressed. Department of Labor
components are listed in Appendix A to
this part.
(e) Record means any information that
would be an agency record subject to
the requirements of this part when
maintained by an agency in any format,
including an electronic format, and any
information described under this part
that is maintained for an agency by an
entity under Government contract, for
the purposes of records management.
(f) Request means any written request
for records made pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(3) and which meets the
requirements of this part.
(g) Requester means any person who
makes a request.
(h) Search means to look for,
manually or by automated means,
Department records for the purpose of
locating them in response to a pending
request.
(i) The Secretary means the Secretary
of Labor.
(j) Submitter means any person or
entity from whom the Department
receives or obtains confidential
commercial or financial information,
directly or indirectly. The term
submitter includes, but is not limited to,
corporations, labor organizations, nonprofit organizations, and local, state,
and tribal and foreign governments.
(k) Unusual circumstances means, to
the extent reasonably necessary for the
proper processing of a FOIA request:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
(1) The need to search for and collect
the requested records from physically
separate facilities;
(2) The need to search for, collect, and
appropriately examine a voluminous
amount of separate and distinct records
that are demanded in a single request;
or
(3) The need for consultation, which
will be conducted with all practicable
speed, with another agency or among
two or more components of the
Department having a substantial interest
in the determination of the request.
§ 70.3
Presumption of openness.
All agency records, except those
exempt from mandatory disclosure by
one or more provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552(b) or the law enforcement
exclusions in 5 U.S.C. 552(c), will be
made promptly available to any person
submitting a written request in
accordance with the procedures of this
part. The Department will withhold
records under the FOIA only when the
Department reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by a FOIA exemption or is
prohibited by law. Whenever the
Department determines that full
disclosure of a requested record is not
possible, the Department will consider
whether partial disclosure is possible
and will take reasonable steps to
segregate and release nonexempt
material. As set forth in Sec. 70.4, the
Department proactively identifies and
discloses records of interest to the
public.
§ 70.4 Proactive disclosure of
Departmental records.
Records that are required by the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), to be made
available for public inspection in an
electronic format may be accessed
through the Department’s Web site.
Each component is responsible for
determining which of its records are
required to be made publicly available,
as well as identifying additional records
of interest to the public that are
appropriate for public disclosure, and
for posting and indexing such records.
Each component must review and
update its Web site of posted records
and indices on an ongoing basis.
§ 70.5
Compilation of new records.
Nothing in 5 U.S.C. 552 or this part
requires that any agency or component
create a new record in order to respond
to a request for records. A component
must, however, make reasonable efforts
to search for records that already exist
in electronic form or format, except
when such efforts would significantly
interfere with the operation of the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
component’s automated information
systems. The component will determine
what constitutes a reasonable effort on
a case-by-case basis.
§ 70.6
Disclosure of originals.
(a) No original record or file in the
custody of the Department of Labor, or
of any component or official thereof,
will on any occasion be given to any
agent, attorney, or other person not
officially connected with the
Department without the written consent
of the Secretary, the Solicitor of Labor
or the Inspector General.
(b) The individual authorizing the
release of the original record or file must
ensure that a copy of the document or
file is retained in the component that
had custody and/or control when an
original document or file is released
pursuant to this subpart.
§§ 70.7–70.18
[Reserved]
Subpart B—Procedures for Disclosure
of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
§ 70.19 Requirements for making a
request.
(a) General information. The
Department of Labor has a decentralized
system for responding to requests
submitted under the FOIA, as explained
in § 70.1 of this part. In addition to
processing requests for its own records,
each agency component has the ability
to receive FOIA requests in writing by
mail, delivery service/courier or
facsimile at its designated mailing
address. However, to enable proper
handling, any FOIA request submitted
electronically, by email, must be
submitted to the Department’s central
FOIA mailbox at foiarequests@dol.gov.
FOIA requests sent electronically to any
other email address will not be
accepted. A FOIA request submitted via
email should designate the component
or components to which the requester is
submitting his/her request. The
Department’s central FOIA mailbox is
regularly monitored, and requests will
be assigned to the appropriate DOL
FOIA component.
(b) Request for records. To make a
request for records of the Department,
whenever possible, a requester should
write directly to the FOIA office of the
component that maintains the records
sought or, if emailing a request to the
DOL central FOIA mailbox, should
identify the component(s) to which the
request is directed. Submitting the
request directly to the FOIA office of the
component that maintains the records
sought, or identifying that component
when sending a FOIA request via email,
will facilitate the quickest response. The
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
requester must provide a mailing
address to receive correspondence, and
it may facilitate processing if telephone
and email contact information are
provided.
(1) The Department’s components for
the purposes of the FOIA are listed in
Appendix A to this part. The function
and mailing address of each Department
of Labor component is available on the
Department’s FOIA Web site at https://
www.dol.gov/dol.foia. This page also
provides other information that is
helpful in determining where to make a
request.
(2) Requesters who cannot determine
the proper FOIA office component or
who are requesting records from
multiple components may also send
requests to the Office of the Solicitor,
Office of Information Services, 200
Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–2420, Washington, DC 20210
or by email to foiarequests@dol.gov.
(3) Pursuant to § 70.25(a), if a
requester submits a FOIA request to the
incorrect DOL FOIA component, or
sends a request to the Department’s
central FOIA office or mailbox without
identifying the component(s) to which
the request is submitted, the time to
respond begins to run when the request
is received by the proper component,
but no later than 10 working days after
receipt in any component identified in
Appendix A or in the Office of
Information Services.
(c) Description of records sought.
Requesters must describe the record or
records sought in sufficient detail to
enable Department personnel to locate
them with a reasonable amount of effort.
To the extent possible, the request
should provide enough identifying
information to help the component
identify the requested records, such as
the subject of the record, the date or
approximate date when the record was
created, the record’s title or name, case
or file number, reference number, the
person or office or the office location
that created it, and any other pertinent
identifying details. Prior to submitting
the request, a requester may wish to
consult the references provided in § 70.1
of this part, the relevant FOIA Requester
Service Center or the FOIA Public
Liaison to discuss the records they are
seeking and to receive assistance on
how to describe the records.
(d) Deficient descriptions and revised
requests. If the description is
insufficient, so that a knowledgeable
employee who is familiar with the
subject area of the request cannot
identify the record with a reasonable
amount of effort, the component
processing the request will notify the
requester and describe what additional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
information is needed to process the
request.
(1) Requesters who are attempting to
modify or reformulate their requests
may discuss their requests with the
component’s designated FOIA contact,
the FOIA Public Liaison, or a
representative of OIS, each of whom is
available to assist the requester in
reasonably describing the records
sought. Every reasonable effort will be
made to assist a requester in the
identification and location of the
records sought. If the requester fails to
reasonably describe the records sought,
the agency’s response to the request may
be delayed.
(2) Any amended request must be
confirmed in writing and meet the
requirements for a request under this
part.
(3) While an agency component
awaits a requester’s modified FOIA
request, the processing time limits
described in § 70.25(a)(1) will be tolled
(that is, the processing time clock will
be stopped on one occasion only) until
clarification is received from the
requester.
§ 70.20 Responsibility for responding to
requests.
(a) In general. Except in the instances
stated in paragraph (d) of this section,
the component that first receives a
request for a record and maintains that
record is the component responsible for
responding to the request. In
determining which records are
responsive to a request, a component
ordinarily will include only records in
its possession as of the date that the
component begins the search; if any
other date is used, the component will
inform the requester of that date. A
record that is excluded from the
requirements of the FOIA pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(c), is not considered
responsive to a request. When it is
determined that records responsive to a
request may be located in multiple
components of the Department, the
Office of Information Services may
coordinate the Department’s response. If
the Office of Information Services
deems a consolidated response
appropriate, it will issue such a
response on behalf of the Department.
(b) Authority to grant or deny
requests. Pursuant to relevant
exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or an
exclusion under 5 U.S.C. 552(c), the
head of a component, or designee, is
authorized to grant or to deny any
requests for records that are maintained
by that component.
(c) Re-routing of misdirected requests.
Where a component’s FOIA office
determines that a request was
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7673
misdirected within the Department, the
receiving component’s FOIA office will
work with OIS to facilitate the routing
of the request to the FOIA office of the
proper component(s).
(d) Consultations and referrals. When
a component is reviewing records in
response to a request, it will determine
if another component of the
Department, or of the Federal
Government, is better able to determine
whether the record can be disclosed or
is exempt from disclosure under the
FOIA. If the receiving component
determines that it is not best able to
process the record, then the receiving
component will either:
(1) Respond to the request after
consulting with the component or
agency best able to determine whether
to disclose the record and with any
other component or agency that has a
substantial interest in the record; or
(2) Refer the responsibility for
responding to the request regarding that
record to the component best able to
determine whether to disclose it, or to
another agency that originated the
record (but only if that entity is subject
to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the component
or agency that originated the record will
be presumed to be best able to
determine whether to disclose it.
(e) Notice of referral. Whenever a
component refers all or any part of the
responsibility for responding to a
request to another component or agency,
the component will notify the requester
of the referral and inform the requester
of the name of each component or
agency to which the request has been
referred and provide contact
information for that component or
agency.
(f) Classified records. Any request for
classified records which are in the
custody of the Department of Labor will
be referred to the classifying agency
under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
section.
§ 70.21
Responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components should, to
the extent practicable, communicate
with requesters using the method that is
most likely to increase the speed and
efficiency of the communication,
including by electronic means, such as
by email.
(b) Acknowledgements of requests. A
component will acknowledge each new
request and assign it an individualized
tracking number. Components will
include in the acknowledgment a brief
description of the records sought to
allow the requesters to more easily keep
track of their requests.
(c) Granting a request. After a
component makes a determination to
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
7674
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
grant a request in full or in part, the
component will notify the requester in
writing. The component will provide
the record in the form or format
requested if the record is readily
reproducible in that form or format,
provided the requester has agreed to pay
and/or has paid any fees required by
subpart C of this part. The component
will determine on a case-by-case basis
what constitutes a readily reproducible
format. Each component should make
reasonable efforts to maintain its records
in commonly reproducible forms or
formats. The component must notify the
requester of the right to seek assistance
from the Department’s FOIA Public
Liaison.
(d) Adverse determinations of
requests. A component making an
adverse determination denying a request
in any respect must notify the requester
in writing. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, include decisions
that: The requested record is exempt, in
whole or in part, from release pursuant
to one or more exemptions under the
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552; the request does not
reasonably describe the records sought;
the information requested is not a
record subject to the FOIA; the
requested record does not exist, cannot
be located, or has been destroyed; or the
requested record is not readily
producible in the form or format sought
by the requester. Adverse
determinations also include denials
involving fees or fee waiver matters or
denials for requests for expedited
processing.
(e) Content of the denial. The denial
notice must be signed by the component
agency head or a designee and will
include:
(1) The name and title or position of
the person responsible for the denial;
(2) A brief statement of the reason or
reasons for the denial, including any
FOIA exemption or exemptions applied
or procedural reasons relied upon by the
component in denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of
records or information withheld, in
number of pages or in some other
reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided
if the volume is otherwise indicated
through deletions on records disclosed
in part, or if providing an estimate
would harm an interest protected by the
exemption under which the deletion
was made;
(4) A statement that the denial may be
appealed as described under Sec. 70.22;
and
(5) A statement notifying the requester
of the right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Department’s FOIA
Public Liaison or the Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
Government Information Services
(within the National Archives and
Records Administration). Engaging in
dispute resolution services provided by
OGIS is a voluntary process. If the
Department agrees to participate in the
mediation services provided by OGIS, it
will actively engage as a partner to the
process in an attempt to resolve the
dispute.
(f) Markings on released documents.
Markings on released documents must
be clearly visible to the requester.
Records disclosed in part shall be
marked to show the amount of
information deleted and the
exemption(s) under which the deletion
was made unless doing so would harm
an interest protected by an applicable
exemption. The location of the
information deleted shall also be
indicated on the records, if technically
feasible.
§ 70.22
Appeals from denial of requests.
(a) A requester may appeal to the
Solicitor of Labor from any adverse
determination, including but not limited
to when one or more of the following
has occurred: A request for access to
records has been denied in whole or in
part; a requester disputes a
determination that records cannot be
located or have been destroyed; a
requester disputes a determination by a
component concerning the assessment
or waiver of fees; a requester disputes
the denial of a request for expedited
processing; or a component fails to
respond to a request within the time
limits set forth in the FOIA and
referenced in 70.25(a). The appeal must
be filed within 90 days of the date of the
action being appealed.
(b) The appeal must state in writing
the grounds for appeal, and it may
include any supporting statements or
arguments, but such statements are not
required. In order to facilitate
processing of the appeal, the appeal
should include the assigned request
number (if applicable), appellant’s
mailing address and daytime telephone
number, as well as copies of the initial
request and the component’s response.
If mailed, the envelope and the letter of
appeal should be clearly marked:
‘‘Freedom of Information Act Appeal.’’
Any amendment to the appeal must be
in writing and received prior to a
decision on the appeal.
(c) The appeal should be addressed to
the Solicitor of Labor, Office of the
Solicitor, FOIA Appeals Unit, Division
of Management and Administrative
Legal Services, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–2420, Washington, DC 20210.
Appeals also may be submitted by fax
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to 202–693–5538 or by email to
foiaappeal@dol.gov. Appeals submitted
to any other email address will not be
accepted.
§ 70.23
Action on appeals.
The Solicitor of Labor, or designee,
will review the appellant’s appeal and
make a determination de novo whether
the action of the component was proper
and in accordance with the applicable
law.
§ 70.24 Form and content of action on
appeals.
The disposition of an appeal will be
issued by the Solicitor of Labor or
designee in writing. A decision
affirming, in whole or in part, the
decision below will include a brief
statement of the reason or reasons for
the affirmance, including the FOIA
exemption or exemptions relied upon,
and its relation to each record withheld.
The appeal determination will advise
the requester of the availability of the
mediation services of the Office of
Government Information Services
(OGIS) as a non-exclusive alternative to
litigation. The appeal will also notify
the requester of the statutory right to
judicial review of the denial by the
United States District Court for the
judicial district in which the requester
resides or maintains his or her principal
place of business, the judicial district in
which the requested records are located,
or the District of Columbia. If it is
determined on appeal that a record
should be disclosed, the record will be
provided in accordance with the
decision on appeal. If it is determined
that records should be denied in whole
or in part, the appeal determination will
include an estimate of the volume of
records or information withheld, in
number of pages or in some other
reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided
if the volume is otherwise indicated
through deletions on records disclosed
in part, or if providing an estimate
would harm an interest protected by an
applicable exemption.
§ 70.25 Time limits and order in which
requests and appeals must be processed.
(a) Time limits. The FOIA establishes
a 20 business day deadline for regular
requests and appeals, and a 10 calendar
day time limit for making
determinations regarding expedited
processing. Components of the
Department of Labor will comply with
the time limits required by the FOIA for
responding to and processing requests
and appeals. In instances involving
misdirected requests that are re-routed
pursuant to § 70.20(c) of this subpart,
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
the response time will commence on the
date that the request is received by the
proper component’s office that is
designated to receive requests, but in
any event not later than 10 working
days after the request is first received by
any component’s office that is
designated by these regulations to
receive requests. A component or the
designated appeal authority will notify
a requester whenever they are unable to
respond to or process the request or
appeal within the time limits
established by the FOIA.
(b) Multitrack processing. All
components must designate a specific
track for requests that are granted
expedited processing, in accordance
with the standards set forth in
paragraph (d) of this section. A
component may also designate
additional processing tracks that
distinguish between simple and
complex requests based on the
estimated amount of work and/or time
needed to process the request, including
based on the number of pages involved
and the need for consultations or
referrals. Components shall advise the
requesters of the track into which their
request falls and, when appropriate,
shall offer the requester an opportunity
to limit the scope of their requests in
order to qualify for faster processing
within the specified limits of the
component’s faster track.
(c) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where
the statutory time limits for processing
a request cannot be met because of
‘‘unusual circumstances,’’ as set forth in
the FOIA at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i)–(iii),
and the component determines to
extend the time limits on that basis, the
component shall, before the expiration
of the 20 working day deadline to
respond, notify the requester in writing
of the unusual circumstances and of the
date by which processing of the request
can be expected to be completed. If the
component intends to extend the
deadline to respond by more than ten
working days, the component must:
(i) Provide the requester with an
opportunity either to modify the request
so that it may be processed within the
time limits or to arrange an alternative
time period with the component for
processing the request or a modified
request;
(ii) Make available to the requester the
contact information for the designated
FOIA contact and the FOIA Public
Liaison to assist the requester; and
(iii) Notify the requester of the right
to seek dispute resolution services from
the Office of Government Information
Services (OGIS).
(d) Aggregating requests. Where a
component reasonably believes that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
multiple requests submitted by a
requester, or by a group of requesters
acting in concert, constitute a single
request that would otherwise involve
unusual circumstances, and the requests
involve clearly related matters, they
may be aggregated. Components shall
not aggregate multiple requests
involving unrelated matters.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) Requests
and appeals will be taken out of order
and given expedited treatment
whenever it is determined that they
involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of
expedited treatment could reasonably be
expected to pose an imminent threat to
the life or physical safety of an
individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged federal
government activity, if made by a
person primarily engaged in
disseminating information;
(iii) The loss of substantial due
process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and
exceptional media interest in which
there exists possible questions about the
government’s integrity which affect
public confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing
may be made at the time of the initial
request for records or at any later time.
For a prompt determination, a request
for expedited processing must be
received by the proper component.
Requests based on paragraphs (e)(1)(i)
through (iv) of this section must be
submitted to the component that
maintains the records requested.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct to the
best of that person’s knowledge and
belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing. For
example, a requester within the category
in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, if
not a full-time member of the news
media, must establish that he or she is
a person whose main professional
activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his
or her sole occupation. Such a requester
also must establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the
request—one that goes beyond the
public’s general right to know about
government activity. The existence of
numerous articles published on a given
subject can be helpful in establishing
the requirement that there be an
‘‘urgency to inform’’ the public on a
topic. As a matter of administrative
discretion, a component may waive the
formality of certification.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7675
(4) Within ten calendar days of its
receipt of a request for expedited
processing, the proper component will
decide whether to grant the request and
will notify the requester of the decision.
If a request for expedited treatment is
granted, the request will be given
priority and will be processed as soon
as practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, any appeal of that
decision will be acted on expeditiously.
§ 70.26 Confidential commercial
information.
(a) In general. Confidential
commercial information will be
disclosed under the FOIA only in
accordance with this section and
Executive Order 12,600, ‘‘Predisclosure
Notification Procedures for Confidential
Commercial Information’’ (3 CFR 1988
Comp., p.235).
(b) Designation of confidential
commercial information. A submitter of
confidential commercial information
will use good-faith efforts to designate,
by appropriate markings, either at the
time of submission or at a reasonable
time thereafter, any portions of its
submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for,
a longer designation period.
(c) Notice to submitters. A component
will provide a submitter with prompt
written notice of a FOIA request that
seeks its confidential commercial
information whenever required under
paragraph (d) of this section, except as
provided in paragraph (g) of this
section, in order to give the submitter an
opportunity to object in writing to
disclosure of any specified portion of
that information under paragraph (e) of
this section. The notice will either
describe the confidential commercial
information requested or include copies
of the requested records or record
portions containing the information.
When notification to a voluminous
number of submitters is required,
notification may be made by posting or
publishing notice reasonably likely to
accomplish such notification.
(d) When notice is required. Notice
will be given to a submitter whenever:
(1) The information requested under
the FOIA has been designated in good
faith by the submitter as information
considered protected from disclosure
under Exemption 4; or
(2) A component has reason to believe
that the information requested under the
FOIA may be protected from disclosure
under Exemption 4, but has not yet
determined whether the information is
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
7676
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
protected from disclosure under that
exemption or any other applicable
exemption.
(e) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
A component will allow a submitter a
reasonable time to respond to the notice
described in paragraph (c) of this
section taking into account the amount
of material the submitter has to review
and the deadlines imposed by the FOIA
or agreed to with the requester. If a
submitter has any objection to
disclosure, it is required to submit a
detailed written statement. The
statement must show why the
information is a trade secret or
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential. In the
event that a submitter fails to respond
to the notice within the time specified,
the submitter will be considered to have
no objection to disclosure of the
information. Information provided by a
submitter under this paragraph may
itself be subject to disclosure under the
FOIA.
(f) Notice of intent to disclose. A
component will consider a submitter’s
timely objections and specific grounds
for non-disclosure in deciding whether
to disclose confidential commercial
information. Whenever a component
decides to disclose confidential
commercial information over the
objection of a submitter, the component
will give the submitter written notice,
which will include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why
each of the submitter’s disclosure
objections were not sustained;
(2) A description of the confidential
commercial information to be disclosed;
and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
will be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
(g) Exceptions to notice requirements.
The notice requirements of paragraphs
(c) and (f) of this section will not apply
if:
(1) The component determines that
the information should not be disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by statute (other than the
FOIA) or by a regulation issued in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 12,600; or
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (b) of this
section appears obviously frivolous or
such a designation would be
unsupportable—except that, in such a
case, the component will, within a
reasonable time prior to a specified
disclosure date, give the submitter
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information.
(h) Notice of a FOIA lawsuit.
Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of
confidential commercial information,
the component will promptly notify the
submitter.
(i) Corresponding notice to requesters.
Whenever a component provides a
submitter with notice and an
opportunity to object to disclosure
under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
section, the component will also notify
the requester(s). Whenever a component
notifies a submitter of its intent to
disclose requested information under
paragraph (f) of this section, the
component will also notify the
requester(s). Whenever a submitter files
a lawsuit seeking to prevent the
disclosure of confidential commercial
information, the component will notify
the requester(s).
(j) Notice requirements. The
component will fulfill the notice
requirements of this section by
addressing the notice to the confidential
commercial submitter or its legal
successor at the address indicated on
the records, or the last known address.
If the notice is returned, the component
will make a reasonable effort to locate
the confidential commercial submitter
or its legal successor. Where notification
of a voluminous number of submitters is
required, such notification may be
accomplished by posting and publishing
the notice in a place reasonably
calculated to accomplish notification.
§ 70.27
Preservation of records.
Each component will preserve all
correspondence relating to the requests
it receives under this part, and all
records processed pursuant to such
requests, until disposition or
destruction of such correspondence and
records is authorized by Title 44 of the
United States Code or the National
Archives and Records Administration’s
General Records Schedule 4.2. Records
are not to be destroyed while they are
the subject of a pending request, appeal,
or lawsuit under the Act.
§§ 70.28–70.37
[Reserved]
Subpart C—Costs for Production of
Records
§ 70.38
Definitions related to costs.
The following definitions apply to
this subpart:
(a) Request, in this subpart, includes
any request, as defined by § 70.2(f) of
this part.
(b) Direct costs means those
expenditures which a component
actually incurs in searching for and
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
duplicating (and in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing)
records to respond to a FOIA request.
Direct costs include, for example, the
salary of the Federal employee
performing work (the basic rate of pay
for the Federal employee plus 16
percent of that rate to cover benefits)
and the cost of operating duplication
machinery. Not included in direct costs
are overhead expenses such as costs of
space, heating or lighting the facility in
which the records are kept.
(c) Duplication means the process of
making a copy of a record necessary to
respond to a request. Such copy can
take the form of paper, microform,
audio-visual materials or electronic
records (such as a CD or other media).
(d) Search means the process of
looking for and retrieving records or
information that are responsive to a
FOIA request. It includes page-by-page
or line-by-line identification of
information within records and also
includes reasonable efforts to locate and
retrieve information from records
maintained in electronic form or format.
FOIA components will ensure that
searches are done in the most efficient
and least expensive manner reasonably
possible. A search does not include the
review of material, as defined in
paragraph (e) of this section, which is
performed to determine whether
material is exempt from disclosure.
(e) Review means the process of
examining records, including audiovisual, electronic mail, etc., located in
response to a request to determine
whether any portion of the located
record is exempt from disclosure, and
accordingly may be withheld. It also
includes the act of preparing materials
for disclosure, i.e., doing all that is
necessary to excise them and otherwise
prepare them for release. Review time
includes time spent contacting any
submitter, and considering and
responding to any objections to
disclosure made by a submitter under
Sec. 70.26, but does not include time
spent resolving general legal or policy
issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
(f) Commercial use request means a
request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers his or her
commercial, trade or profit interests,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. When
considering fee issues, components will
determine, whenever reasonably
possible, the use to which a requester
will put the requested records. When it
appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either
because of the nature of the request
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
itself or because a component has
reasonable cause to doubt a requester’s
stated use, the component will provide
the requester a reasonable opportunity
to submit further clarification.
(g) Educational institution means an
institution which:
(1) Is a preschool, public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education; or
(2) Operates a program or programs of
scholarly research. To qualify under this
definition, the program of scholarly
research in connection with which the
information is sought must be carried
out under the auspices of the academic
institution itself as opposed to the
individual scholarly pursuits of persons
affiliated with an institution. For
example, a request from a professor
predicated upon research funding
granted to the institution would meet its
requirements. A request from a
professor seeking information that will
assist in the writing of a book,
independent of his or her institutional
responsibilities, would not qualify
under this definition.
(h) Non-commercial scientific
institution means an institution that is
not operated on a commercial basis and
that is operated solely for the purpose
of conducting scientific research, the
results of which are not intended to
promote any particular product or
industry.
(i) Representative of the news media
means any person or entity that gathers
information of potential interest to a
segment of the public, uses its editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work
to an audience. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio
stations that broadcast ‘‘news’’ to the
public at large and publishers of
periodicals that disseminate ‘‘news’’
and make their products available
through a variety of means to the
general public, as well as news
organizations that operate solely on the
internet. Alternative media may be
considered to be news media entities.
These examples are not all inclusive.
(1) Factors indicating status as a news
media representative include press
accreditation, guild membership, a
history of continuing publication,
business registration, and/or Federal
Communication Commission licensing,
among others.
(2) For purposes of this definition,
news contemplates information that is
about current events or that would be of
current interest to the public.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
(3) A freelance journalist will be
treated as a representative of the news
media if the person can demonstrate a
solid basis for expecting publication of
matters related to the requested
information through a news media
entity. A publication contract with a
news media entity satisfies this
requirement. An individual’s past
publication record with such
organizations is also relevant in making
this determination.
§ 70.39 Statutes specifically providing for
setting of fees.
This subpart will not apply to fees
charged under any statute, other than
the FOIA, that specifically requires an
agency to set and collect fees for
particular types of records.
§ 70.40 Charges assessed for the
production of records.
(a) General. Components shall charge
for processing requests under the FOIA
in accordance with the provisions of
this section and with the OMB
Guidelines. In order to resolve any fee
issues that arise under this section, a
component may contact a requester for
additional information. Components
will ensure that searches, review, and
duplication are conducted in the most
efficient and least expensive manner. A
component ordinarily will collect all
applicable fees before sending copies of
records to the requester.
(b) Types of charges. There are three
types of charges assessed in connection
with the production of records in
response to a request, specifically,
charges for costs associated with:
(1) Searching for or locating
responsive records (search costs),
(2) Duplicating such records
(duplication costs), and
(3) Reviewing records to determine
whether any materials are exempt
(review costs).
(c) Types of requesters. (1) There are
four types of requesters:
(i) Commercial use requesters,
(ii) Educational and non-commercial
scientific institutions,
(iii) Representatives of the news
media, and
(iv) All other requesters.
(2) Depending upon the type of
requester, as set forth in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, the charges outlined in
paragraph (d) of this section may be
assessed.
(d) Types of charges that will be
assessed for each type of request—(1)
Commercial use request. When a
requester makes a commercial use
request, search costs, duplication costs
and review costs will be assessed in
their entirety.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7677
(2) Educational or non-commercial
scientific institution request. When an
educational or non-commercial
scientific institution makes a request,
only duplication costs will be assessed,
excluding charges for the first 100
pages.
(3) Request by representative of news
media. When a representative of the
news media makes a request, only
duplication costs will be assessed,
excluding charges for the first 100
pages.
(4) All other requesters. Requesters
making a request which does not fall
within paragraph (d)(1), (2), or (3) of this
section will be charged search costs and
duplication costs, except that the first
100 pages of duplication and the first
two hours of search time will be
furnished without charge. Where
computer searches are involved, the
monetary equivalent of two hours of
search time by a professional employee
will be deducted from the total cost of
computer processing time.
(e) Charges for each type of activity—
(1) Search costs. (i) When a search for
records is performed by a clerical
employee, a rate of $5.00 per quarter
hour will be applicable. When a search
is performed by professional or
supervisory personnel, a rate of $10.00
per quarter hour will be applicable.
Components will charge for time spent
searching even if they do not locate any
responsive records or they withhold the
records located as exempt from
disclosure.
(ii) For computer searches of records,
requesters will be charged the direct
costs of conducting the search, except as
provided in paragraph (e)(4) of this
section.
(2) Duplication costs. The standard
copying charge for records in black and
white paper copy is $0.15 per page. This
charge includes the operator’s time to
duplicate the record. When responsive
information is provided in a format
other than 81⁄2 x 11 or 11 x 14 inch black
and white paper copy, such as computer
tapes, disks and color copies, the
requester may be charged the direct
costs of the tape, disk, audio-visual or
whatever medium is used to produce
the information, as well as the direct
cost of duplication, including operator
time.
(3) Review costs. Costs associated
with the review of records, as defined in
§ 70.38(e), will be charged for work
performed by a clerical employee at a
rate of $5.00 per quarter hour when
applicable. When professional or
supervisory personnel perform work, a
rate of $10.00 per quarter hour will be
charged, when applicable. Except as
noted in this paragraph, charges may
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
7678
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
only be assessed for review the first time
the records are analyzed to determine
the applicability of specific exemptions
to the particular record or portion of the
record. Thus a requester would not be
charged for review at the administrative
appeal level with regard to the
applicability of an exemption already
applied at the initial level. When,
however, a record has been withheld
pursuant to an exemption which is
subsequently determined not to apply
and is reviewed again at the appellate
level to determine the potential
applicability of other exemptions, the
costs attendant to such additional
review will be assessed.
(4) Limitations on charging fees. If a
component fails to comply with the
time limits in which to respond to a
request, it shall not assess certain fees
except:
(i) If there are unusual circumstances
(as that term is defined in § 70.25(c))
and the component has provided timely
written notice, the component is
permitted ten additional days to
respond to the request. After the
expiration of the ten additional days,
the component is no longer permitted to
assess search fees or, in the instances of
requests from requesters described in
§ 70.38(h) and (i), duplication fees
except as described in paragraph
(e)(4)(ii) of this section.
(ii) If there are unusual circumstances
(as that term is defined in § 70.25(c)),
and more than 5,000 pages of
documents are necessary to respond to
the request, the component may
continue to charge assessable fees for as
long as it takes to process the request,
provided that the component has
provided timely written notice and
discussed with the requester via
telephone, email, or written mail (or
made at least three good-faith attempts
to do so) how the requester could
effectively limit the scope of the
pending request.
(iii) If a court has determined that
exceptional circumstances exist, as
defined in the FOIA, 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(C) the agency’s failure to
comply with any time limits of the
FOIA are excused for the length of time
provided by the court order.
(5) Mailing cost. Where responses are
sent by mail, no postage charge will be
made for transmitting by regular mail a
single copy of the requested record to
the requester, or for mailing additional
copies where the total postage cost does
not exceed $5.00. However, where the
volume of paper or other produced
material or the requested method of
transmittal requested is in excess of
$5.00, the transmittal costs will be
added.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
(f) Aggregating requests for purposes
of assessing costs. (1) Where a
component reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting
together is attempting to divide a
request into a series of requests for the
purpose of avoiding fees, the disclosure
officer may aggregate those requests and
charge accordingly.
(2) Components may presume that
multiple requests of this type made
within a 30-day period have been
submitted in order to avoid fees. Where
requests are separated by a longer
period, disclosure officers will aggregate
them only where a solid basis exists for
determining that aggregation is
warranted under all of the
circumstances involved. Multiple
requests involving unrelated matters
will not be aggregated.
(g) Interest charges. Components will
assess interest on an unpaid bill starting
on the 31st day following the date of
billing the requester. Interest charges
will be assessed at the rate provided in
31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the
date of the billing until payment is
received by the component.
Components will follow the provisions
of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub.
L. 97–365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended,
and its administrative procedures,
including the use of consumer reporting
agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Authentication of copies—(1) Fees.
The FOIA does not require certification
or attestation under seal of copies of
records provided in accordance with its
provisions. Pursuant to provisions of the
general user-charger statute, 31 U.S.C.
9701 and Subchapter II of title 29
U.S.C., the following charges will be
made when, upon request, such services
are rendered by the agency in its
discretion:
(i) For certification of true copies,
$10.00 each certification.
(ii) For attestation under the seal of
the Department, $10.00 each attestation
under seal.
(2) Authority and form for attestation
under seal. Authority is hereby given to
any officer or officers of the Department
of Labor designated as authentication
officer or officers of the Department to
sign and issue attestations under the
seal of the Department of Labor.
(i) Transcripts. Fees for transcripts of
an agency proceeding, as defined in the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
5521(12) will be assessed in accordance
with the provisions of this subpart.
(j) Privacy Act requesters. A request
from an individual or on behalf of an
individual for a record maintained by
that individual’s name or other unique
identifier which is contained within a
component’s system of records, will be
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
treated under the fee provisions at 29
CFR 71.6.
§ 70.41
Waiver or reduction of fees.
(a) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive
to a request will be furnished without
charge or at a charge reduced below that
established under § 70.40(e) of this
subpart, where a component
determines, based on all available
information, that the requester has
demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government, and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is
not primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the
requirement of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section is met, components will
consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether
the subject of the requested records
concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of
the government.’’ The subject of the
requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed: Whether
the disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’
to an understanding of government
operations or activities. The disclosable
portions of the requested records must
be meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities in
order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either a duplicative or
a substantially identical form, would
not be as likely to contribute to such
understanding where nothing new
would be added to the public’s
understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure:
Whether disclosure of the requested
information will contribute to ‘‘public
understanding.’’ The disclosure must
contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons
interested in the subject, as opposed to
the individual understanding of the
requester. A requester’s expertise in the
subject area and ability and intention to
effectively convey information to the
public will be considered. It will be
presumed that a representative of the
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
news media will satisfy this
consideration.
(iv) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to
contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to the public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a
significant extent.
(3) To determine whether the
requirement of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
this section is met, components will
consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest: Whether the
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. The component will
consider any commercial interest of the
requester (with reference to the
definition of ‘‘commercial use request’’
in § 70.38(f) of this subpart), or of any
person on whose behalf the requester
may be acting, that would be furthered
by the requested disclosure. Requesters
will be given an opportunity in the
administrative process to provide
explanatory information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure:
Whether any identified commercial
interest of the requester is sufficiently
large, in comparison with the public
interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.’’ A fee waiver or
reduction is justified where the public
interest standard is satisfied and that
public interest is greater in magnitude
than that of any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. The component
ordinarily will presume that where a
news media requester has satisfied the
public interest standard, the public
interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester.
Disclosure to data brokers or others who
merely compile and market government
information for direct economic return
will not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to
be released satisfy the requirements for
a waiver of fees, a waiver will be
granted only for those records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or
reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraph (a) of this
section, insofar as they apply to each
request.
(b) Submission. Requests for a waiver
or reduction of fees should be made
when the request is first submitted to
the component and should address the
criteria referenced above. A requester
may submit a fee waiver request at a
later time so long as the underlying
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
record request is pending or on
administrative appeal. When a requester
who has committed to pay fees
subsequently asks for a waiver of those
fees and that waiver is denied, the
requester will be required to pay any
costs incurred up to the date the fee
waiver request was received.
(c) Appeal rights. Requesters
dissatisfied with treatment of fee waiver
or reduction requests may follow the
procedures for appeal under Sections
70.22 and 70.23.
§ 70.42
Consent to pay fees.
(a) The Department will not assess or
collect fees where the fee to be assessed,
after deducting any free pages and/or
search time, is less than $25.00. When
making a request, a requester may
specify a willingness to pay up to a
certain amount, e.g., $50.00 or $200.
(b) No request will be processed if a
component reasonably believes that the
fees are likely to exceed the amount to
which the requester has originally
consented, absent supplemental written
consent by the requester to proceed after
being notified of this determination.
(c) When a component determines or
estimates that the fees to be assessed in
accordance with this section will exceed
$25.00, the component shall notify the
requester of the actual or estimated
amount of the fees, including a
breakdown of the fees for search, review
or duplication, unless the requester has
indicated a willingness to pay fees as
high as those anticipated. If only a
portion of the fee can be estimated
readily, the component must advise the
requester accordingly. Such notice may
invite the requester to reformulate the
request to satisfy his or her needs at a
lower cost.
(d) Components must make available
their FOIA contact to assist any
requester in reformulating a request to
meet the requester’s needs at a lower
cost.
§ 70.43
Payment of fees.
(a) De minimis costs. As noted in
§ 70.42(a) of this subpart, the
Department has determined it will not
assess or collect fees below $25.00. In
these cases, the cost of collecting and
processing a fee equals or exceeds the
amount of the fee which would
otherwise be assessed. The Department
will assess fees where the costs to be
assessed, after deduction of any free
pages and/or search time, is $25.00 or
higher.
(b) How payment will be made.
Requesters will pay fees assessed by
check or money order made payable to
the Treasury of the United States, and
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7679
sent to the component that is processing
the request.
(c) Advance payments and billing. (1)
Prior to beginning to process a request,
the component will make a preliminary
assessment of the amount that can
properly be charged to the requester for
search and review time and copying
costs. Where a component determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged
under this section will be more than
$250.00, the component will require the
requester to make an advance payment
of an amount up to the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to
process the request. The component
may waive the advance payment where
the component receives a satisfactory
assurance of full payment from a
requester who has a history of prompt
payment of an amount similar to the one
anticipated by the request.
(2) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged FOIA
fee to any component of the Department
of Labor within 30 days of the date of
billing, a component will require the
requester to pay the full amount due,
plus any applicable interest as provided
in Sec. 70.40(f) and to make an advance
payment of the full amount of any
anticipated fee, before the component
begins to process a new request or
appeal or continues to process a
pending request or appeal from that
requester.
(3) For a request other than those
described in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of
this section, a component will not
require the requester to make an
advance payment before beginning to
process a request. Payment owed for
work already completed on a request
pursuant to consent of the requester is
not an advance payment and a
component may require the requester to
make a payment for such work prior to
releasing any records to the requester.
(d) Time limits to respond extended
when advance payments are requested.
When a component has requested an
advance payment of fees in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section, the
time limits prescribed in Sec. 70.25 will
only begin to run after the component
has received the advance payment.
§ 70.44
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this subpart will be
construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any records to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
7680
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 13 / Monday, January 23, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
§§ 70.45–70.52
[Reserved]
Subpart D—Public Records and Filings
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
§ 70.53 Office of Labor-Management
Standards.
(a) The following documents in the
custody of the Office of LaborManagement Standards are public
information available for inspection
and/or purchase of copies in accordance
with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section.
(1) Data and information contained in
any report or other document filed
pursuant to sections 201, 202, 203, 211,
301 of the Labor-Management Reporting
and Disclosure Act of 1959 (73 Stat.
524–28, 530, 79 Stat. 888, 73 Stat. 530,
29 U.S.C. 431–433, 441, 461).
(2) Data and information contained in
any report or other document filed
pursuant to the reporting requirements
of 29 CFR part 458, which are the
regulations implementing the standards
of conduct provisions of the Civil
Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C.
7120, and the Foreign Service Act of
1980, 22 U.S.C. 4117. The reporting
requirements are found in 29 CFR 458.3.
(3) Data and information contained in
any report or other document filed
pursuant to the Congressional
Accountability Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1351, 109 Stat. 19.
(b) The documents listed in paragraph
(a) of this section are available from:
U.S. Department of Labor, Office of
Labor-Management Standards, Public
Disclosure Room, N–1519, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Reports filed pursuant to
section 201 of the Labor-Management
Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959
and pursuant to 29 CFR 458.3
implementing the Civil Service Reform
Act of 1978 and the Foreign Service Act
of 1980 for the year 2000 and thereafter
are also available at https://www.unionreports.dol.gov.
(c) Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 435(c) which
provides that the Secretary will by
regulation provide for the furnishing of
copies of the documents listed in
paragraph (a) of this section, upon
payment of a charge based upon the cost
of the service, these documents are
available at a cost of $ .15 per page for
record copies furnished. Authentication
of copies is available in accordance with
the fee schedule established in Sec.
70.40. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(vi), the provisions for fees,
fee waivers and fee reductions in
subpart C of this part do not supersede
these charges for these documents.
(d) Upon request of the Governor of a
State for copies of any reports or
documents filed pursuant to sections
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Jan 19, 2017
Jkt 241001
201, 202, 203, or 211 of the LaborManagement Reporting and Disclosure
Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 524–528, 79 Stat.
888; 29 U.S.C. 431–433, 441), or for
information contained therein, which
have been filed by any person whose
principal place of business or
headquarters is in such State, the Office
of Labor-Management Standards will:
(1) Make available without payment
of a charge to the State agency
designated by law or by such Governor,
such requested copies of information
and data, or
(2) Require the person who filed such
reports and documents to furnish such
copies or information and data directly
to the State agency thus designated.
§ 70.54 Employee Benefits Security
Administration.
(a) The annual financial reports (Form
5500) and attachments/schedules as
filed by employee benefit plans under
the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA) are in the custody
of the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA) at the address
indicated in paragraph (b) of this
section, and the right to inspect and
copy such reports, as authorized under
ERISA, at the fees set forth in this part,
may be exercised at such office.
(b) The mailing address for the
documents described in this section is:
U.S. Department of Labor, Employee
Benefits Security Administration, Public
Documents Room, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Appendix A to Part 70—FOIA
Components
The following list identifies the individual
agency components of the Department of
Labor for the purposes of the FOIA. Each
component is responsible for making records
in its custody available for inspection and
copying, in accordance with the provisions of
the FOIA and this part. Unless otherwise
specified, the mailing addresses for the
following national office components are
listed below. Updated contact information for
national and regional offices can be found on
the DOL Web site at https://www.dol.gov/dol/
foia.
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20210.
1. Office of the Secretary (OSEC).
2. Office of the Solicitor (SOL).
3. Office of Administrative Law Judges
(ALJ), 800 K Street NW., Suite N–400,
Washington, DC 20001–8002.
4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Administration and Management (OASAM).
5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Policy (OASP).
6. Office of the Chief Financial Officer
(OCFO).
7. Office of Congressional and
Intergovernmental Affairs (OCIA).
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8. Office of Disability Employment Policy
(ODEP).
9. Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs (OFCCP).
10. Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
11. Office of Labor Management Standards
(OLMS).
12. Office of Public Affairs (OPA).
13. Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs (OWCP).
14. Bureau of International Labor Affairs
(ILAB).
15. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Postal
Square Building, Room 4040, 2
Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC
20212–0001.
16. Employment and Training
Administration (ETA). Job Corps (part of
ETA).
17. Mine Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA), 201 12th Street, South, Arlington,
Virginia 22202.
18. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA).
19. Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA).
20. Veterans’ Employment and Training
Service (VETS).
21. Employees’ Compensation Appeals
Board (ECAB).
22. Administrative Review Board (ARB).
23. Benefits Review Board (BRB).
24. Wage and Hour Division (WHD).
25. Women’s Bureau (WB).
Appendix B to Part 70—[Reserved]
Thomas E. Perez,
Secretary of Labor .
[FR Doc. 2017–00453 Filed 1–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 56 and 57
[Docket No. MSHA–2014–0030]
RIN 1219–AB87
Examinations of Working Places in
Metal and Nonmetal Mines
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Mine Safety and Health
Administration’s final rule amends the
Agency’s standards for the examination
of working places in metal and
nonmetal mines. This final rule requires
that an examination of the working
place be conducted before miners begin
working in that place, that operators
notify miners in the affected areas of
any conditions found that may
adversely affect their safety or health,
that operators promptly initiate
corrective action, and that a record be
made of the examination. The final rule
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAR1.SGM
23JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7666-7680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00453]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
29 CFR Part 70
RIN 1290-AA30
Revision of FOIA Regulations
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Department of Labor's regulations
under the Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''). The regulations have
been revised to update and streamline the language of several
procedural provisions and to incorporate changes brought about by the
amendments to the FOIA under the OPEN Government Act of 2007 and the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. Additionally, the regulations have been
updated to incorporate changes in the agency's administrative
structure.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 23, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ramona Branch Oliver, Director, Office
of Information Services, 202-693-5391 (this is not a toll free number)
or 1-877-889-5627 (TTY). Individuals with hearing or speech impairments
may access the telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8839.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 17, 2016, the Department of Labor
published a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) to revise its
existing regulations under the FOIA found at 29 CFR part 70, to update
and streamline the language of several procedural provisions and to
incorporate changes brought about by the amendments to the FOIA under
the OPEN Government Act of 2007, Public Law 110-175, 121 Stat. 2524,
and the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law 114-185, 130 Stat. 538
(enacted June 30, 2016). The Department invited comments through
October 17, 2016.
Discussion of Comments: Preparation of the NPRM and this
finalization of the
[[Page 7667]]
Department's updated FOIA regulation satisfied the requirement in
Section 3 of the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 that each agency review
and revise its FOIA regulation to be consistent with the statutory
requirements.
Interested persons were afforded the opportunity to participate in
the rulemaking process through submission of written comments to the
proposed rule during the open comment period. In total, the Department
received six submissions in response to its proposed rule, including
comments from two Federal agencies, as well as internal comments from a
component of the Department. Due consideration has been given to each
of the comments received and, in response, the Department has made
several modifications to the rule. These modifications include
clarifying, revising, or expanding various provisions, withdrawing a
provision, retaining existing language for certain other provisions,
and making technical edits, such as correcting Web site links.
Discussion of each of the comments, and the Departments response
follows:
Section 70.2 Definitions
One commenter expressed concern that the use of the phrase ``or
financial'' is superfluous in the first clause of subsection Sec.
[thinsp]70.2(j) (defining submitter), because that phrase is already
included in the definition of ``confidential commercial information''
in subsection (b). The Department has determined that including ``or
financial'' is helpful in identifying different types of information.
As such, DOL declines to make the requested change.
One commenter suggested that the definition of ``unusual
circumstances'' in Sec. [thinsp]70.2(k)(3) should state that
consultation could occur ``. . . with another agency or among two or
more components of the Department having a substantial interest in the
determination of the request.'' The Department agrees that the proposed
change will enhance the rule's clarity, and so the revised final rule
adopts this proposed language.
Section 70.3 Policy
One commenter suggested changing the title of Sec. [thinsp]70.3
from ``Policy'' to ``Presumption of Openness,'' because, following the
June 2016 statutory amendments to FOIA, this section addresses not a
matter of policy, but of law. The Department agrees with this comment.
The final rule modifies this section to be titled, ``Presumption of
Openness.''
One commenter suggested that the regulation does not include the
use of exclusions and that if DOL would have any opportunity to use an
exclusion, they should be addressed. The Department agrees with this
comment and has incorporated by reference the law enforcement
exclusions in subsection (c) of the FOIA at Sec. Sec. 70.3 and
70.20(b).
Section 70.4 Proactive Disclosure of Departmental Records
One commenter noted that the Department makes many (a)(2) proactive
disclosures by posting materials on DOL Web sites other than the
Department's specific FOIA Web site pages, for which a URL was included
in this section of the NPRM. Accordingly, the commenter suggested
removing a specific link to the Department's FOIA Web page and instead
stating more generally that records may be accessed through the
Department's Web site. The Department agrees with the comment, and the
final rule has been revised to remove the specific URL.
Section 70.19 Requirements for Making a Request
Three commenters expressed concern regarding DOL's decision to
continue to have a single central email box for the receipt of FOIA
requests, and raised a number of points regarding whether this creates
inefficiencies in DOL's FOIA processing. Specifically, Sec. 70.19(a)
of the NPRM states, consistent with the Department's existing FOIA
regulation at 29 CFR 70.19(b), that any FOIA request submitted
electronically, by email, must be submitted to a single email address.
One commenter requested that DOL clarify that even though DOL's
FOIA program is decentralized, DOL will receive all electronic
submission to one inbox and that each request will then be sent to the
appropriate component for processing. That same commenter expressed
concern that the NPRM language regarding a central email inbox may be
in conflict with the NPRM at Sec. 70.19(b), which states that
requesters should submit their request directly to the component that
maintains the records sought. The same commenter suggested that if DOL
has a single email address for electronic submissions, it should make
clear that the requester must designate the component to which the
request is directed. One of the commenters sought to confirm that
requests submitted electronically are not automatically subject to the
``routing'' provision, under which the time processing clock does not
begin until a request is received in the proper component or until ten
days after receipt anywhere in the Department. This same commenter
flagged that Sec. 70.19(b)(2) of the NPRM provides that requesters who
do not know where to submit their request can email it to the same
central email address indicated for all requests submitted
electronically in (a), and that ``routing'' procedures might then
apply. The same commenter asked how DOL will know which requests need
to be ``routed'' vs. those that are just being submitted electronically
to a particular component. The commenter also stated that when
requesters indicate the component (or components if they are submitting
to more than one), it does not seem appropriate for DOL to ``route''
these requests because this is the only way they may be submitted
electronically. The commenter asked whether DOL considered establishing
email addresses to receive electronic submissions for all components.
The commenter noted that this approach would seem to allow requests to
get where they need to go more efficiently.
DOL has considered these comments and--for the reasons explained
below--has determined that DOL's FOIA program can be administered most
effectively with a single central email inbox for receipt of FOIA
requests, but that some clarification to the regulatory text of Sec.
70.19 can be made to explain DOL's process and address the commenters'
concerns. DOL has established an effective method to receive and assign
incoming FOIA requests received by email. DOL has established a single
centralized FOIA mailbox, which is actively monitored by staff within
the Department's central FOIA office, the Office of Information
Services. Staff who monitor the FOIA mailbox are responsible for
ensuring that FOIA requests are appropriately directed to the agency
component(s) identified by the requester or to the appropriate
component(s) in instances where the requester has failed to identify a
component or has identified the wrong component. Receipt in the central
FOIA email inbox does not automatically add 10 additional days for
``routing,'' rather, the Department has established an operational
performance measure that tracks whether requests are routed to the
agency component(s) likely to maintain responsive records within two
business days of receipt. By having a centralized FOIA email inbox
monitored by FOIA staff, the Department has ensured that FOIA requests
are not received at email addresses that are not regularly monitored,
or sent to DOL staff who are not involved in FOIA processing and may
not know what to do with an incoming FOIA request.
For these reasons, the Department has determined to retain the
concept of a
[[Page 7668]]
central incoming FOIA email inbox. However, DOL has modified the
language of Sec. 70.19(a) in several ways to increase public clarity
and promote efficient logging and assignment of incoming FOIA requests.
The final text adds language to Sec. 70.19(a) and (b) further
explaining the Department's process, and indicating that requesters
should, when emailing in requests, identify the component or components
to which they are submitting their FOIA request in order to facilitate
the timely assignment and processing of their request. The final rule
also seeks to clarify the circumstances under which the time to respond
begins to run, by moving the last clause of Sec. 70.19(b)(2) from the
NPRM into a separate provision at Sec. 70.19(b)(3), and clarifying
that if a requester submits a FOIA request to the incorrect DOL FOIA
component, or sends a request to the Department's central FOIA office
or mailbox without identifying the component(s) to which the request is
submitted, the time to respond begins to run when the request is
received by the proper component, but no later than 10 working days
after receipt in any component identified in Appendix A or in the
Office of Information Services.
One commenter raised a concern that the language in the NPRM at
Sec. 70.19(d)(3) is overly broad regarding when the processing of a
FOIA request can be tolled. The commenter suggested that the rule track
the language of the statute more closely to indicate a request can be
tolled only once if the agency is seeking clarification from the
requester about their request. The Department concurs, and in response
to this comment, the final rule has been modified to read, ``While an
agency component awaits a requester's modified FOIA request, the
processing time limits described in Sec. 70.25(a)(1) will be tolled
(that is, the processing time clock will be stopped on one occasion
only) until clarification is received from the requester.''
Section 70.20 Responsibility for Responding to Requests
One commenter raised concerns with the provision at Sec.
[thinsp]70.20(a) providing that the Department's Office of Information
Services may coordinate responses when ``it is determined that records
responsive to a request may be located in multiple components of the
Department.'' The commenter suggested that this provision might add an
obligation beyond the requirements of the FOIA, for example, requiring
one component to conduct searches at those other components and process
those records.
The Department disagrees that this provision, which is not a
procedural change from the existing regulation, creates new or
additional responsibilities. This provision does not mandate that OIS
coordinate responses, or that one component undertake searches of other
components' records. Rather this provision recognizes that there may be
circumstances where similar or the same documents are maintained by
multiple components of the Department, and it is appropriate to
coordinate search, review and response, for example, through use of
coordinated search terms. Although DOL's FOIA program is decentralized,
it remains one agency and seeks to speak in one voice on matters of
disclosure of documents that may be duplicative or have overlapping
equities across the agency. In addition, this comment raises a policy
question related to how DOL structures its FOIA operation, and the
Department has determined that it will continue its present program
administration and flexibility in the operation of the Department's
FOIA program. Accordingly, the final rule adopts the provision as
proposed.
Regarding the provisions at Sec. [thinsp]70.20(d) related to
consultations and referrals, one commenter suggested that the first
sentence should be edited to clarify that consults and referrals are
only appropriate when a component has actually located records. The
Department agrees that the language could more clearly identify when
consultations and referrals are appropriate and, therefore, the
Department is making the following change in the final rule:
``Consultations and referrals. When a component is reviewing records in
response to a request, it will determine if another component of the
Department, or of the Federal Government, is better able to determine
whether the record can be disclosed or is exempt from disclosure under
the FOIA.''
Also, in reference to Sec. [thinsp]70.20(d), one commenter
suggested that the language be altered because, as written, it does not
authorize the Department to consult with the Office of White House
Counsel, which is neither an ``agency'' nor a Department component. The
Department does not believe a revision is necessary because the
regulatory language recognizes that consultation or referral may occur
with ``another component . . . of the Federal Government.'' The
Department believes that this adequately covers instances where DOL
might need to consult with the Office of White House Counsel.
One commenter suggested that Sec. 70.20 should include language on
``coordination'' to cover situations where referring records may not be
appropriate, and gave as an example instances where a referral would
reveal classified information. The Department does not believe this
change is necessary, as the Department does not have original
classification authority pursuant to the prevailing executive order on
national security classification and, likewise, does not have the
authority to downgrade or declassify documents.
Section 70.21 Responses to Requests
One commenter suggested that Sec. 70.21(b) should require the
Department's acknowledgement letter to indicate the date of receipt of
the request. The Department declines to make this change as it is
beyond the scope of the current statutory requirement. It is also
unnecessary to DOL's FOIA program because Departmental policy is that
acknowledgment letters should provide requesters with a link to the
public FOIA portal, which provides the requester with the date of
receipt. The final rule adopts the provision as proposed.
One commenter suggested that Sec. 70.21(c) should be revised to
add that written communications notifying a requester of the grant of a
request will include notice of the availability of the FOIA Public
Liaison, as required by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. The
Department concurs and has modified this provision in the final rule to
read, ``The component must notify the requester of the right to seek
assistance from the Department's FOIA Public Liaison.''
One commenter suggested that the wording of Sec. 70.21(e)(5) of
the NPRM, regarding the ``Content of the denial,'' incorrectly implies
that ``adverse determination'' and ``denial'' are different in kind,
and suggested combining the subparts of (5) into (e). The commenter
stated that any denial is an adverse determination and must include
notification of appeal rights as well as the availability of OGIS and
the FOIA Public Liaison. The Department concurs that the language of
Sec. 70.21(e)(5) in the NPRM potentially led to confusion. In response
to this comment, the Department has combined subsections (4) and (5) of
this provision in the final rule.
The Final Rule includes a new provision of Section 70.21(e)(5) that
states ``Engaging in dispute resolution services provided by OGIS is a
voluntary process. If the Department agrees to participate in the
mediation services provided by OGIS, it will
[[Page 7669]]
actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to resolve
the dispute.'' This change is in response to a comment received on
Section 70.22.
Section 70.22 Appeals From Denials of Requests
The NPRM at Sec. 70.22(a) identified as one circumstance in which a
FOIA requester could file an appeal ``a component's failure to respond
to the request within the time limits.'' One commenter objected to this
language on grounds that there is no response to appeal when the DOL
component to which a FOIA request was submitted has not provided a
timely response, and that a requester does not need to administratively
appeal in order to exhaust administrative remedies. The Department
declines to remove the reference to ``a component's failure to respond
to the request within the time limits'' as an example of a circumstance
that may prompt an administrative appeal because many requesters are
not inclined to seek judicial review on the basis of a delayed response
to a pending FOIA request and would rather seek to obtain disclosure of
information through the administrative appeals process. Although a
requester does not have to exhaust his or her administrative remedies
on timeliness issues where no initial response has been provided, the
Department believes that the better practice under FOIA is to continue
to make an administrative appeal available to requesters, and that
eliminating this option may result in requesters believing that
litigation is necessary when an administrative process may more quickly
and cost effectively address the requester's concern.
One commenter raised a concern with the wording of Sec. 70.22(a)
in that it does not identify the ability of a requester to appeal from
a failure of the Department to respond in a timely manner to a request
for expedited processing, or to appeal in the event that the Department
refuses to provide responsive records in a requested format. As Sec.
70.21 provides, a FOIA requester may file an administrative appeal in
response to any denial or adverse determination. Section 70.22(a)
provides examples of when a requester may seek a de novo review through
the Department's FOIA administrative appeal process, but the list is
not intended to be an exhaustive identification of the bases for
appeal. To assist the public, the Department has revised this provision
in the final rule to make clear that it provides examples rather than
an exhaustive list.
One commenter suggested that using the word ``must'' in the second
sentence of Sec. 70.22(b) regarding items to be provided along with a
FOIA appeal creates an administrative hurdle that is counter to the
spirit of FOIA. The Department agrees with this comment and has
modified the language in the final rule to replace the word ``must''
with ``should.''
One commenter suggested adding language about engaging with OGIS
somewhere in Sec. 70.22 or its own section to satisfy the requirement
of the FOIA Improvement Act that agency FOIA regulations include
procedures for engaging with OGIS. The commenter suggested including
the following language in the Final Rule: ``Engaging in dispute
resolution services provided by OGIS. Mediation is a voluntary process.
If an agency agrees to participate in the mediation services provided
by OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an
attempt to resolve the dispute.'' In response to this comment, the
Department has included language in Section 70.21(e)(5), which it
believes is a more appropriate place for this language. The new
provision of Section 70.21(e)(5) states ``Engaging in dispute
resolution services provided by OGIS is a voluntary process. If the
Department agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by
OGIS, it will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt
to resolve the dispute.''
Section 70.24 Form and Content of Action on Appeals
One commenter suggested that in the third sentence, ``Consistent
with the statute'' should be removed, noting that the Freedom of
Information Act, as amended, does not require notification about
services provided by OGIS in appeals letters, but rather that any such
inclusion is based on guidance from the Office of Information Policy.
In response to this comment, the Department has modified the language
in the final rule and removed the phrase ``consistent with the
statute'' from this provision.
Section 70.25 Time Limits and Order in Which Requests and Appeals Must
Be Processed
One commenter suggested that Sec. 70.25(a) should note that the
routing of requests may impact timing. The commenter recommended adding
the following language, ``In instances involving misdirected requests
that are re-routed pursuant to Sec. 70.20(c) of this subpart, the
response time will commence on the date that the request is received by
the proper component's office that is designated to receive requests,
but in any event not later than 10 working days after the request is
first received by any component's office that is designated by these
regulations to receive requests.'' The Department agrees with this
comment and has added the suggested language to the final rule.
One commenter suggested removing the clause ``unless there are
exceptional circumstances within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C)''
from Sec. 70.25(a) and noted that only a court can make a
determination that there are exceptional circumstances. The Department
agrees with this comment, and has removed this provision from the final
rule.
In relation to Sec. 70.25(c)(1), one commenter suggested that, as
a practical matter and looking at agency response times, agencies tend
to need more than ten additional days when there are unusual
circumstances requiring extension of processing times. The commenter
suggested that the language stating ``this extension should not
ordinarily exceed ten business days'' be removed. The Department agrees
with this comment, and has removed this phrase from the final rule.
One commenter suggested that the Department was creating an
unnecessary administrative burden by requiring in Sec. 70.25(e)(3)
that a person seeking expedited processing as a member of the media
establish that ``he or she is a person whose main professional activity
or occupation is information dissemination . . .'' Consistent with
administrative guidance, the Department believes that to meet the
standard for expedited processing under the FOIA statute (see 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(6)(E)(v)(II)) a requester who is not a full-time member of the
news media must establish that he or she is a person whose primary
professional activity or occupation is information dissemination,
though it need not be the requester's sole occupation. DOL does not
believe that requiring the requester to meet the statutory standard is
unnecessarily burdensome. Therefore, the final rule adopts the
provision as proposed in the NPRM.
Section 70.26 Confidential Commercial Information
One commenter recommended that Executive Order 12,600 be cited
consistently in Sec. Sec. 70.26(a) and (g)(3). The Department agrees
with this comment and has edited these sections for consistency in the
final rule.
One commenter suggested that Sec. 70.26(e) and (f)(3) should be
modified to provide that the ``reasonable period'' that a submitter has
to object to the agency's proposed treatment of the submitter's
material will be at least five business days from the date that the
[[Page 7670]]
submitter receives the agency's notice. The Department declines to make
this change. The NPRM provision at Sec. 70.26(e) indicates that a
submitter will be provided with a ``reasonable time to respond'' to a
notice from the agency, but also notes that the response date will be
specified in the submitter's notice provided in accordance with
Executive Order 12,600. Furthermore, the time provided to a submitter
for responding is based upon the volume and complexity of the materials
requested. Section 70.26(f)(3) does not discuss response time periods.
The final rule adopts both provisions as proposed.
Section 70.38 Definitions Related to Costs
One commenter suggested a change to Sec. 70.38(a), which states
that ``request'' in the costs subpart includes any request and any
appeal. The commenter suggested removing the reference to the FOIA
appeal stage on grounds that no fees are assessed on appeal, noting
that while a request may be remanded on appeal for further processing,
any subsequent fees apply to the underlying request, not the appeal.
The Department agrees with this comment, and the final rule removes
references to FOIA appeals.
Regarding Sec. 70.38(c), one commenter suggested using the term
``duplication'' throughout instead of ``reproduction'' in order to be
consistent with the FOIA statute, which states that fees shall be
limited to search, duplication, and review, and OMB guidelines. The
Department agrees with this comment and has modified the final rule to
use the term ``duplication.''
Three commenters made suggestions related to the definition of
educational institutions for cost purposes in the NPRM at Sec.
70.38(g)(2). The commenters suggested that this provision should
reflect and adopt the holding of Sack v. Department of Defense, 823
F.3d 687 (D.C. Cir. 2016), which found that students may qualify as
educational institution requesters in some circumstances. In response
to these comments and to retain flexibility to determine a student's
eligibility for a fee waiver based on any future judicial
interpretations or guidance issued by Department of Justice, the
Department has removed the following sentence from the final rule, ``A
request from a student enrolled in an individual course of study at an
education institution would not qualify as a request from the
institution.''
Regarding the definition of ``representative of the news media'' in
the NPRM at Sec. 70.38(i)(3), one commenter asked that DOL remove two
uses of the word ``qualifying'' from the phrase ``qualifying news media
entity'' because inclusion of the word ``qualifying'' gives the
impression that a news media entity must meet some separate or
additional qualification standard. The commenter suggested that the
phrase ``news media entity'' is sufficient. The Department agrees with
this comment. The final rule removes the word ``qualifying'' from this
provision.
70.40 Charges Assessed for the Production of Records
Two commenters noted that, in Sec. 70.40(c) and (d), DOL has
identified four types of requesters for fee purposes, and suggested
that these groups could be combined into three. The Department has
determined that identifying four types of requesters is helpful to
distinguish between different types of requesters that communicate with
the Department. As such, the Department declines to make the change
requested, and the final rule adopts the provision as proposed.
One commenter noted that Sec. 70.40(e)(1)(iii) of the NPRM states
that if a search requires transportation of the searcher to the
location of the records, or of the records to the searcher, all
transportation costs in excess of $5 may be added to search costs. The
commenter raised questions about this provision and whether it was an
appropriate cost to pass on to the requester. In response to the
comments received, the Department is removing this provision from the
final rule as unnecessary. The Department notes that this provision has
been in effect since 2006 when the DOL last published its FOIA
regulations (see 71 FR 30762), but is not aware of any instance in
which such costs have been assessed.
One commenter noted that Sec. 70.40(e)(2) of the NPRM states that
a FOIA component may require the requester to provide any medium
requested other than paper. The commenter raised questions about this
provision and whether it was an appropriate burden to pass on to the
requester. In response, the Department is removing this provision from
the final rule as unnecessary. The Department notes that this provision
has been in effect since 2006 when DOL last published its FOIA
regulations (see 71 FR 30762), but is not aware of any instances where
this provision was applied.
One commenter asked if DOL has evaluated the actual cost of
reproducing paper copies identified in Sec. 70.40(e)(2) (FOIA
requests) and 70.53(c) (requests for documents from the Office of
Labor-Management Standards). The commenter suggested that, with the use
of commercial vendors, actual costs are likely close to 5 or 10 cents
per page, rather than the 15 cent per page costs included in the NPRM.
DOL notes that it does not typically use commercial vendors to help
fulfill requests for paper-based records in response to FOIA requests,
and therefore that comparison may not be applicable here. Furthermore,
as the NPRM states, reproduction cost also reflects the time associated
with reproducing the documents being provided. Accordingly, DOL
declines to make a change to the cost of the duplication of paper-based
records. The final rule adopts the provision as proposed.
Regarding the NPRM provisions regarding limitations on fee charges,
one commenter suggested that Sec. 70.40(e)(4)(i) should use language
that more closely matches the statutory language. The commenter
suggested that section (4) should note what the ``certain fees'' are,
and suggested, that, as written, this provision does not account for
the possibility of the exception in Sec. 70.40(e)(4)(ii).
Additionally, the commenter suggested that Sec. 70.40(e)(4)(ii) should
be edited to state ``and more than 5,000 pages are necessary to respond
to the request,'' noting that ``deemed to be responsive'' is
potentially more restrictive. The Department agrees that this comment
has identified some potentially confusing language, and has accordingly
modified Sec. 70.40(e)(4) to incorporate the recommended change.
In addition to the changes made as a result of specific comments
and Departmental feedback, this final rule includes changes already
identified in the NRPM (see 81 FR 54770) to include changes in language
and structure of the existing regulation and to codify changes based on
the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016. As an additional administrative
update, the Department is also making a change to Sec. [thinsp]70.27
(Preservation of records) to update the National Archives and Records
Administration's General Records Schedule which governs the disposition
of FOIA case files and related records from GRS 14 to GRS 4.2:
Information Access and Protection Records.
Regulatory Flexibility Act: The Secretary of Labor, in accordance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed
this regulation and by approving it certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Under the FOIA, agencies may recover only the
[[Page 7671]]
direct costs of searching for, reviewing, and duplicating the records
processed for requesters, and only for certain classes of requester and
when particular conditions are satisfied. Thus, fees assessed by the
Department are nominal. Further, the ``small entities'' that make FOIA
requests, as compared with individual requesters and other requesters,
are relatively few in number.
Executive Order 12,866: This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12,866, Sec. 1(b),
Principles of Regulation. The Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12,866, Sec. 3(f), Regulatory Planning and
Review, and accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by OMB.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995: This rule will not result in
the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one
year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1995: This
rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (as amended), 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 70
Administrative Practice and Procedure; Freedom of Information Act;
Privacy.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Labor revises
29 CFR part 70 to read as follows:
PART 70--PRODUCTION OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION OR MATERIALS
Subpart A--General
Sec.
70.1 General provisions.
70.2 Definitions.
70.3 Presumption of openness.
70.4 Proactive disclosure of Departmental records.
70.5 Compilation of new records.
70.6 Disclosure of originals.
70.7-70.18 [Reserved]
Subpart B--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom of
Information Act
70.19 Requirements for making a request.
70.20 Responsibility for responding to requests.
70.21 Responses to requests.
70.22 Appeals from denial of requests.
70.23 Action on appeals.
70.24 Form and content of action on appeals.
70.25 Time limits and order in which requests and appeals must be
processed.
70.26 Confidential commercial information.
70.27 Preservation of records.
70.28-70.37 [Reserved]
Subpart C--Costs for Production of Records
70.38 Definitions related to costs.
70.39 Statutes specifically providing for setting of fees.
70.40 Charges assessed for the production of records.
70.41 Waiver or reduction of fees.
70.42 Consent to pay fees.
70.43 Payment of fees.
70.44 Other rights and services.
70.45-70.52 [Reserved]
Subpart D--Public Records and Filings
70.53 Office of Labor-Management Standards.
70.54 Employee Benefits Security Administration.
Appendix A to Part 70--FOIA Components
Appendix B to Part 70--[Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 29 U.S.C. 551 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended; Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950, 5 U.S.C. Appendix, 29
U.S.C. 1026 (106), 5 U.S.C. app. 11., Executive Order. 12,600, 52 FR
23781, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235. This part also implements the
public information provisions of the Labor-Management Reporting and
Disclosure Act (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. 435, see Sec. 70.53 below; the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C.
1026 (106), see Sec. 70.54 below; and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. app. 11, see Sec. 70.40(i) below.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 70.1 General provisions.
(a) This part is organized as follows: Subpart A contains general
information about Department of Labor policies and procedures; subpart
B sets forth the procedures for obtaining access to records of the
Department; subpart C contains the Department's regulations on fees;
and subpart D sets forth the procedures for obtaining access to certain
public records. Appendix A contains a list of all Department of Labor
FOIA components from which records may be obtained.
(b) This part contains the rules that the Department of Labor
follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552. The rules in this
part should be read together with the text of the FOIA, which provides
additional information about access to records maintained by the
Department. Additionally, the Department's ``Guide to Submitting
Requests under the FOIA'' and related documents contain helpful
information about the specific procedures particular to the Department
with respect to making FOIA requests, and descriptions of the types of
records maintained by different components of the Department. These
references are available at https://www.dol.gov/dol/foia/guide6.html.
(c) Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under
the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed under 29 CFR part
71 as well as under this part. Information routinely provided to the
public as part of a regular Department activity (for example, press
releases issued by the Office of Public Affairs (OPA)) may be provided
to the public without following this subpart.
(d) As set forth in Sec. 70.3 of this part, the Department
operates its FOIA program with a presumption of openness and withholds
records or information under the FOIA only when the Department
reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by
a FOIA exemption or when disclosure is prohibited by law.
(e) The Department has a decentralized system for processing
requests, with each component handling requests for its own records.
Each component has a FOIA Customer Service Center that can assist
individuals in locating records and address questions regarding pending
FOIA requests. A list of the Department's Customer Service Centers is
available at https://www.dol.gov/dol/foia/RequestorServiceCenters.htm.
(f) The Secretary has designated a Chief FOIA Officer for the
Department. Contact information for the Chief FOIA Officer is available
on the Department's FOIA Web site, https://www.dol.gov/dol/foia/. The
Office of Information Services (OIS), which is located within the
Office of the Solicitor, provides Department level guidance and
oversight for the Department's FOIA program and supports the
statutorily-based responsibilities of the DOL Chief FOIA Officer.
(g) The Department has a designated FOIA Public Liaison who can
assist individuals in locating records of a particular component and
with resolving issues relating to the processing of a pending FOIA
request. Information concerning the DOL FOIA
[[Page 7672]]
Public Liaison is available at https://www.dol.gov/sol/foia/liaison.htm.
The DOL FOIA Public Liaison is responsible for assisting in reducing
delays in FOIA processing, increasing transparency and understanding,
providing information concerning the status of requests, and assisting
in the resolution of disputes.
Sec. 70.2 Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) The terms agency, person, party, rule, order, and adjudication
have the meaning attributed to these terms by the definitions in 5
U.S.C. 551.
(b) Confidential commercial information means commercial or
financial information received or obtained by the Department from a
submitter, directly or indirectly, that arguably may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA.
(c) The Department means the Department of Labor.
(d) FOIA Component means an official component of the Department
that has authority to disclose or withhold records under the FOIA and
to which requests to inspect or copy records in its custody should be
addressed. Department of Labor components are listed in Appendix A to
this part.
(e) Record means any information that would be an agency record
subject to the requirements of this part when maintained by an agency
in any format, including an electronic format, and any information
described under this part that is maintained for an agency by an entity
under Government contract, for the purposes of records management.
(f) Request means any written request for records made pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) and which meets the requirements of this part.
(g) Requester means any person who makes a request.
(h) Search means to look for, manually or by automated means,
Department records for the purpose of locating them in response to a
pending request.
(i) The Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.
(j) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Department
receives or obtains confidential commercial or financial information,
directly or indirectly. The term submitter includes, but is not limited
to, corporations, labor organizations, non-profit organizations, and
local, state, and tribal and foreign governments.
(k) Unusual circumstances means, to the extent reasonably necessary
for the proper processing of a FOIA request:
(1) The need to search for and collect the requested records from
physically separate facilities;
(2) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a
voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are demanded in
a single request; or
(3) The need for consultation, which will be conducted with all
practicable speed, with another agency or among two or more components
of the Department having a substantial interest in the determination of
the request.
Sec. 70.3 Presumption of openness.
All agency records, except those exempt from mandatory disclosure
by one or more provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or the law enforcement
exclusions in 5 U.S.C. 552(c), will be made promptly available to any
person submitting a written request in accordance with the procedures
of this part. The Department will withhold records under the FOIA only
when the Department reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an
interest protected by a FOIA exemption or is prohibited by law.
Whenever the Department determines that full disclosure of a requested
record is not possible, the Department will consider whether partial
disclosure is possible and will take reasonable steps to segregate and
release nonexempt material. As set forth in Sec. 70.4, the Department
proactively identifies and discloses records of interest to the public.
Sec. 70.4 Proactive disclosure of Departmental records.
Records that are required by the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2), to be
made available for public inspection in an electronic format may be
accessed through the Department's Web site. Each component is
responsible for determining which of its records are required to be
made publicly available, as well as identifying additional records of
interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and
for posting and indexing such records. Each component must review and
update its Web site of posted records and indices on an ongoing basis.
Sec. 70.5 Compilation of new records.
Nothing in 5 U.S.C. 552 or this part requires that any agency or
component create a new record in order to respond to a request for
records. A component must, however, make reasonable efforts to search
for records that already exist in electronic form or format, except
when such efforts would significantly interfere with the operation of
the component's automated information systems. The component will
determine what constitutes a reasonable effort on a case-by-case basis.
Sec. 70.6 Disclosure of originals.
(a) No original record or file in the custody of the Department of
Labor, or of any component or official thereof, will on any occasion be
given to any agent, attorney, or other person not officially connected
with the Department without the written consent of the Secretary, the
Solicitor of Labor or the Inspector General.
(b) The individual authorizing the release of the original record
or file must ensure that a copy of the document or file is retained in
the component that had custody and/or control when an original document
or file is released pursuant to this subpart.
Sec. Sec. 70.7-70.18 [Reserved]
Subpart B--Procedures for Disclosure of Records Under the Freedom
of Information Act
Sec. 70.19 Requirements for making a request.
(a) General information. The Department of Labor has a
decentralized system for responding to requests submitted under the
FOIA, as explained in Sec. 70.1 of this part. In addition to
processing requests for its own records, each agency component has the
ability to receive FOIA requests in writing by mail, delivery service/
courier or facsimile at its designated mailing address. However, to
enable proper handling, any FOIA request submitted electronically, by
email, must be submitted to the Department's central FOIA mailbox at
foiarequests@dol.gov. FOIA requests sent electronically to any other
email address will not be accepted. A FOIA request submitted via email
should designate the component or components to which the requester is
submitting his/her request. The Department's central FOIA mailbox is
regularly monitored, and requests will be assigned to the appropriate
DOL FOIA component.
(b) Request for records. To make a request for records of the
Department, whenever possible, a requester should write directly to the
FOIA office of the component that maintains the records sought or, if
emailing a request to the DOL central FOIA mailbox, should identify the
component(s) to which the request is directed. Submitting the request
directly to the FOIA office of the component that maintains the records
sought, or identifying that component when sending a FOIA request via
email, will facilitate the quickest response. The
[[Page 7673]]
requester must provide a mailing address to receive correspondence, and
it may facilitate processing if telephone and email contact information
are provided.
(1) The Department's components for the purposes of the FOIA are
listed in Appendix A to this part. The function and mailing address of
each Department of Labor component is available on the Department's
FOIA Web site at https://www.dol.gov/dol.foia. This page also provides
other information that is helpful in determining where to make a
request.
(2) Requesters who cannot determine the proper FOIA office
component or who are requesting records from multiple components may
also send requests to the Office of the Solicitor, Office of
Information Services, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-2420,
Washington, DC 20210 or by email to foiarequests@dol.gov.
(3) Pursuant to Sec. 70.25(a), if a requester submits a FOIA
request to the incorrect DOL FOIA component, or sends a request to the
Department's central FOIA office or mailbox without identifying the
component(s) to which the request is submitted, the time to respond
begins to run when the request is received by the proper component, but
no later than 10 working days after receipt in any component identified
in Appendix A or in the Office of Information Services.
(c) Description of records sought. Requesters must describe the
record or records sought in sufficient detail to enable Department
personnel to locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. To the
extent possible, the request should provide enough identifying
information to help the component identify the requested records, such
as the subject of the record, the date or approximate date when the
record was created, the record's title or name, case or file number,
reference number, the person or office or the office location that
created it, and any other pertinent identifying details. Prior to
submitting the request, a requester may wish to consult the references
provided in Sec. 70.1 of this part, the relevant FOIA Requester
Service Center or the FOIA Public Liaison to discuss the records they
are seeking and to receive assistance on how to describe the records.
(d) Deficient descriptions and revised requests. If the description
is insufficient, so that a knowledgeable employee who is familiar with
the subject area of the request cannot identify the record with a
reasonable amount of effort, the component processing the request will
notify the requester and describe what additional information is needed
to process the request.
(1) Requesters who are attempting to modify or reformulate their
requests may discuss their requests with the component's designated
FOIA contact, the FOIA Public Liaison, or a representative of OIS, each
of whom is available to assist the requester in reasonably describing
the records sought. Every reasonable effort will be made to assist a
requester in the identification and location of the records sought. If
the requester fails to reasonably describe the records sought, the
agency's response to the request may be delayed.
(2) Any amended request must be confirmed in writing and meet the
requirements for a request under this part.
(3) While an agency component awaits a requester's modified FOIA
request, the processing time limits described in Sec. 70.25(a)(1) will
be tolled (that is, the processing time clock will be stopped on one
occasion only) until clarification is received from the requester.
Sec. 70.20 Responsibility for responding to requests.
(a) In general. Except in the instances stated in paragraph (d) of
this section, the component that first receives a request for a record
and maintains that record is the component responsible for responding
to the request. In determining which records are responsive to a
request, a component ordinarily will include only records in its
possession as of the date that the component begins the search; if any
other date is used, the component will inform the requester of that
date. A record that is excluded from the requirements of the FOIA
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(c), is not considered responsive to a request.
When it is determined that records responsive to a request may be
located in multiple components of the Department, the Office of
Information Services may coordinate the Department's response. If the
Office of Information Services deems a consolidated response
appropriate, it will issue such a response on behalf of the Department.
(b) Authority to grant or deny requests. Pursuant to relevant
exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552(b) or an exclusion under 5 U.S.C. 552(c),
the head of a component, or designee, is authorized to grant or to deny
any requests for records that are maintained by that component.
(c) Re-routing of misdirected requests. Where a component's FOIA
office determines that a request was misdirected within the Department,
the receiving component's FOIA office will work with OIS to facilitate
the routing of the request to the FOIA office of the proper
component(s).
(d) Consultations and referrals. When a component is reviewing
records in response to a request, it will determine if another
component of the Department, or of the Federal Government, is better
able to determine whether the record can be disclosed or is exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA. If the receiving component determines that
it is not best able to process the record, then the receiving component
will either:
(1) Respond to the request after consulting with the component or
agency best able to determine whether to disclose the record and with
any other component or agency that has a substantial interest in the
record; or
(2) Refer the responsibility for responding to the request
regarding that record to the component best able to determine whether
to disclose it, or to another agency that originated the record (but
only if that entity is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the component
or agency that originated the record will be presumed to be best able
to determine whether to disclose it.
(e) Notice of referral. Whenever a component refers all or any part
of the responsibility for responding to a request to another component
or agency, the component will notify the requester of the referral and
inform the requester of the name of each component or agency to which
the request has been referred and provide contact information for that
component or agency.
(f) Classified records. Any request for classified records which
are in the custody of the Department of Labor will be referred to the
classifying agency under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section.
Sec. 70.21 Responses to requests.
(a) In general. Components should, to the extent practicable,
communicate with requesters using the method that is most likely to
increase the speed and efficiency of the communication, including by
electronic means, such as by email.
(b) Acknowledgements of requests. A component will acknowledge each
new request and assign it an individualized tracking number. Components
will include in the acknowledgment a brief description of the records
sought to allow the requesters to more easily keep track of their
requests.
(c) Granting a request. After a component makes a determination to
[[Page 7674]]
grant a request in full or in part, the component will notify the
requester in writing. The component will provide the record in the form
or format requested if the record is readily reproducible in that form
or format, provided the requester has agreed to pay and/or has paid any
fees required by subpart C of this part. The component will determine
on a case-by-case basis what constitutes a readily reproducible format.
Each component should make reasonable efforts to maintain its records
in commonly reproducible forms or formats. The component must notify
the requester of the right to seek assistance from the Department's
FOIA Public Liaison.
(d) Adverse determinations of requests. A component making an
adverse determination denying a request in any respect must notify the
requester in writing. Adverse determinations, or denials of requests,
include decisions that: The requested record is exempt, in whole or in
part, from release pursuant to one or more exemptions under the FOIA, 5
U.S.C. 552; the request does not reasonably describe the records
sought; the information requested is not a record subject to the FOIA;
the requested record does not exist, cannot be located, or has been
destroyed; or the requested record is not readily producible in the
form or format sought by the requester. Adverse determinations also
include denials involving fees or fee waiver matters or denials for
requests for expedited processing.
(e) Content of the denial. The denial notice must be signed by the
component agency head or a designee and will include:
(1) The name and title or position of the person responsible for
the denial;
(2) A brief statement of the reason or reasons for the denial,
including any FOIA exemption or exemptions applied or procedural
reasons relied upon by the component in denying the request;
(3) An estimate of the volume of records or information withheld,
in number of pages or in some other reasonable form of estimation. This
estimate does not need to be provided if the volume is otherwise
indicated through deletions on records disclosed in part, or if
providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by the exemption
under which the deletion was made;
(4) A statement that the denial may be appealed as described under
Sec. 70.22; and
(5) A statement notifying the requester of the right to seek
dispute resolution services from the Department's FOIA Public Liaison
or the Office of Government Information Services (within the National
Archives and Records Administration). Engaging in dispute resolution
services provided by OGIS is a voluntary process. If the Department
agrees to participate in the mediation services provided by OGIS, it
will actively engage as a partner to the process in an attempt to
resolve the dispute.
(f) Markings on released documents. Markings on released documents
must be clearly visible to the requester. Records disclosed in part
shall be marked to show the amount of information deleted and the
exemption(s) under which the deletion was made unless doing so would
harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption. The location of
the information deleted shall also be indicated on the records, if
technically feasible.
Sec. 70.22 Appeals from denial of requests.
(a) A requester may appeal to the Solicitor of Labor from any
adverse determination, including but not limited to when one or more of
the following has occurred: A request for access to records has been
denied in whole or in part; a requester disputes a determination that
records cannot be located or have been destroyed; a requester disputes
a determination by a component concerning the assessment or waiver of
fees; a requester disputes the denial of a request for expedited
processing; or a component fails to respond to a request within the
time limits set forth in the FOIA and referenced in 70.25(a). The
appeal must be filed within 90 days of the date of the action being
appealed.
(b) The appeal must state in writing the grounds for appeal, and it
may include any supporting statements or arguments, but such statements
are not required. In order to facilitate processing of the appeal, the
appeal should include the assigned request number (if applicable),
appellant's mailing address and daytime telephone number, as well as
copies of the initial request and the component's response. If mailed,
the envelope and the letter of appeal should be clearly marked:
``Freedom of Information Act Appeal.'' Any amendment to the appeal must
be in writing and received prior to a decision on the appeal.
(c) The appeal should be addressed to the Solicitor of Labor,
Office of the Solicitor, FOIA Appeals Unit, Division of Management and
Administrative Legal Services, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-2420, Washington, DC 20210. Appeals
also may be submitted by fax to 202-693-5538 or by email to
foiaappeal@dol.gov. Appeals submitted to any other email address will
not be accepted.
Sec. 70.23 Action on appeals.
The Solicitor of Labor, or designee, will review the appellant's
appeal and make a determination de novo whether the action of the
component was proper and in accordance with the applicable law.
Sec. 70.24 Form and content of action on appeals.
The disposition of an appeal will be issued by the Solicitor of
Labor or designee in writing. A decision affirming, in whole or in
part, the decision below will include a brief statement of the reason
or reasons for the affirmance, including the FOIA exemption or
exemptions relied upon, and its relation to each record withheld. The
appeal determination will advise the requester of the availability of
the mediation services of the Office of Government Information Services
(OGIS) as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation. The appeal will
also notify the requester of the statutory right to judicial review of
the denial by the United States District Court for the judicial
district in which the requester resides or maintains his or her
principal place of business, the judicial district in which the
requested records are located, or the District of Columbia. If it is
determined on appeal that a record should be disclosed, the record will
be provided in accordance with the decision on appeal. If it is
determined that records should be denied in whole or in part, the
appeal determination will include an estimate of the volume of records
or information withheld, in number of pages or in some other reasonable
form of estimation. This estimate does not need to be provided if the
volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on records disclosed in
part, or if providing an estimate would harm an interest protected by
an applicable exemption.
Sec. 70.25 Time limits and order in which requests and appeals must
be processed.
(a) Time limits. The FOIA establishes a 20 business day deadline
for regular requests and appeals, and a 10 calendar day time limit for
making determinations regarding expedited processing. Components of the
Department of Labor will comply with the time limits required by the
FOIA for responding to and processing requests and appeals. In
instances involving misdirected requests that are re-routed pursuant to
Sec. 70.20(c) of this subpart,
[[Page 7675]]
the response time will commence on the date that the request is
received by the proper component's office that is designated to receive
requests, but in any event not later than 10 working days after the
request is first received by any component's office that is designated
by these regulations to receive requests. A component or the designated
appeal authority will notify a requester whenever they are unable to
respond to or process the request or appeal within the time limits
established by the FOIA.
(b) Multitrack processing. All components must designate a specific
track for requests that are granted expedited processing, in accordance
with the standards set forth in paragraph (d) of this section. A
component may also designate additional processing tracks that
distinguish between simple and complex requests based on the estimated
amount of work and/or time needed to process the request, including
based on the number of pages involved and the need for consultations or
referrals. Components shall advise the requesters of the track into
which their request falls and, when appropriate, shall offer the
requester an opportunity to limit the scope of their requests in order
to qualify for faster processing within the specified limits of the
component's faster track.
(c) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where the statutory time limits for
processing a request cannot be met because of ``unusual
circumstances,'' as set forth in the FOIA at 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(B)(i)-
(iii), and the component determines to extend the time limits on that
basis, the component shall, before the expiration of the 20 working day
deadline to respond, notify the requester in writing of the unusual
circumstances and of the date by which processing of the request can be
expected to be completed. If the component intends to extend the
deadline to respond by more than ten working days, the component must:
(i) Provide the requester with an opportunity either to modify the
request so that it may be processed within the time limits or to
arrange an alternative time period with the component for processing
the request or a modified request;
(ii) Make available to the requester the contact information for
the designated FOIA contact and the FOIA Public Liaison to assist the
requester; and
(iii) Notify the requester of the right to seek dispute resolution
services from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS).
(d) Aggregating requests. Where a component reasonably believes
that multiple requests submitted by a requester, or by a group of
requesters acting in concert, constitute a single request that would
otherwise involve unusual circumstances, and the requests involve
clearly related matters, they may be aggregated. Components shall not
aggregate multiple requests involving unrelated matters.
(e) Expedited processing. (1) Requests and appeals will be taken
out of order and given expedited treatment whenever it is determined
that they involve:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual;
(ii) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in
disseminating information;
(iii) The loss of substantial due process rights; or
(iv) A matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which
there exists possible questions about the government's integrity which
affect public confidence.
(2) A request for expedited processing may be made at the time of
the initial request for records or at any later time. For a prompt
determination, a request for expedited processing must be received by
the proper component. Requests based on paragraphs (e)(1)(i) through
(iv) of this section must be submitted to the component that maintains
the records requested.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of that
person's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing. For example, a requester within the
category in paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, if not a full-time
member of the news media, must establish that he or she is a person
whose main professional activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. Such a
requester also must establish a particular urgency to inform the public
about the government activity involved in the request--one that goes
beyond the public's general right to know about government activity.
The existence of numerous articles published on a given subject can be
helpful in establishing the requirement that there be an ``urgency to
inform'' the public on a topic. As a matter of administrative
discretion, a component may waive the formality of certification.
(4) Within ten calendar days of its receipt of a request for
expedited processing, the proper component will decide whether to grant
the request and will notify the requester of the decision. If a request
for expedited treatment is granted, the request will be given priority
and will be processed as soon as practicable. If a request for
expedited processing is denied, any appeal of that decision will be
acted on expeditiously.
Sec. 70.26 Confidential commercial information.
(a) In general. Confidential commercial information will be
disclosed under the FOIA only in accordance with this section and
Executive Order 12,600, ``Predisclosure Notification Procedures for
Confidential Commercial Information'' (3 CFR 1988 Comp., p.235).
(b) Designation of confidential commercial information. A submitter
of confidential commercial information will use good-faith efforts to
designate, by appropriate markings, either at the time of submission or
at a reasonable time thereafter, any portions of its submission that it
considers to be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These
designations will expire ten years after the date of the submission
unless the submitter requests, and provides justification for, a longer
designation period.
(c) Notice to submitters. A component will provide a submitter with
prompt written notice of a FOIA request that seeks its confidential
commercial information whenever required under paragraph (d) of this
section, except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section, in order
to give the submitter an opportunity to object in writing to disclosure
of any specified portion of that information under paragraph (e) of
this section. The notice will either describe the confidential
commercial information requested or include copies of the requested
records or record portions containing the information. When
notification to a voluminous number of submitters is required,
notification may be made by posting or publishing notice reasonably
likely to accomplish such notification.
(d) When notice is required. Notice will be given to a submitter
whenever:
(1) The information requested under the FOIA has been designated in
good faith by the submitter as information considered protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4; or
(2) A component has reason to believe that the information
requested under the FOIA may be protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4, but has not yet determined whether the information is
[[Page 7676]]
protected from disclosure under that exemption or any other applicable
exemption.
(e) Opportunity to object to disclosure. A component will allow a
submitter a reasonable time to respond to the notice described in
paragraph (c) of this section taking into account the amount of
material the submitter has to review and the deadlines imposed by the
FOIA or agreed to with the requester. If a submitter has any objection
to disclosure, it is required to submit a detailed written statement.
The statement must show why the information is a trade secret or
commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential.
In the event that a submitter fails to respond to the notice within the
time specified, the submitter will be considered to have no objection
to disclosure of the information. Information provided by a submitter
under this paragraph may itself be subject to disclosure under the
FOIA.
(f) Notice of intent to disclose. A component will consider a
submitter's timely objections and specific grounds for non-disclosure
in deciding whether to disclose confidential commercial information.
Whenever a component decides to disclose confidential commercial
information over the objection of a submitter, the component will give
the submitter written notice, which will include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why each of the submitter's
disclosure objections were not sustained;
(2) A description of the confidential commercial information to be
disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which will be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(g) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of
paragraphs (c) and (f) of this section will not apply if:
(1) The component determines that the information should not be
disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other
than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12,600; or
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (b) of
this section appears obviously frivolous or such a designation would be
unsupportable--except that, in such a case, the component will, within
a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date, give the
submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the
information.
(h) Notice of a FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of confidential commercial
information, the component will promptly notify the submitter.
(i) Corresponding notice to requesters. Whenever a component
provides a submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to
disclosure under paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, the component
will also notify the requester(s). Whenever a component notifies a
submitter of its intent to disclose requested information under
paragraph (f) of this section, the component will also notify the
requester(s). Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit seeking to prevent
the disclosure of confidential commercial information, the component
will notify the requester(s).
(j) Notice requirements. The component will fulfill the notice
requirements of this section by addressing the notice to the
confidential commercial submitter or its legal successor at the address
indicated on the records, or the last known address. If the notice is
returned, the component will make a reasonable effort to locate the
confidential commercial submitter or its legal successor. Where
notification of a voluminous number of submitters is required, such
notification may be accomplished by posting and publishing the notice
in a place reasonably calculated to accomplish notification.
Sec. 70.27 Preservation of records.
Each component will preserve all correspondence relating to the
requests it receives under this part, and all records processed
pursuant to such requests, until disposition or destruction of such
correspondence and records is authorized by Title 44 of the United
States Code or the National Archives and Records Administration's
General Records Schedule 4.2. Records are not to be destroyed while
they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the
Act.
Sec. Sec. 70.28-70.37 [Reserved]
Subpart C--Costs for Production of Records
Sec. 70.38 Definitions related to costs.
The following definitions apply to this subpart:
(a) Request, in this subpart, includes any request, as defined by
Sec. 70.2(f) of this part.
(b) Direct costs means those expenditures which a component
actually incurs in searching for and duplicating (and in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA
request. Direct costs include, for example, the salary of the Federal
employee performing work (the basic rate of pay for the Federal
employee plus 16 percent of that rate to cover benefits) and the cost
of operating duplication machinery. Not included in direct costs are
overhead expenses such as costs of space, heating or lighting the
facility in which the records are kept.
(c) Duplication means the process of making a copy of a record
necessary to respond to a request. Such copy can take the form of
paper, microform, audio-visual materials or electronic records (such as
a CD or other media).
(d) Search means the process of looking for and retrieving records
or information that are responsive to a FOIA request. It includes page-
by-page or line-by-line identification of information within records
and also includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in electronic form or format. FOIA components
will ensure that searches are done in the most efficient and least
expensive manner reasonably possible. A search does not include the
review of material, as defined in paragraph (e) of this section, which
is performed to determine whether material is exempt from disclosure.
(e) Review means the process of examining records, including audio-
visual, electronic mail, etc., located in response to a request to
determine whether any portion of the located record is exempt from
disclosure, and accordingly may be withheld. It also includes the act
of preparing materials for disclosure, i.e., doing all that is
necessary to excise them and otherwise prepare them for release. Review
time includes time spent contacting any submitter, and considering and
responding to any objections to disclosure made by a submitter under
Sec. 70.26, but does not include time spent resolving general legal or
policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
(f) Commercial use request means a request from or on behalf of a
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or
her commercial, trade or profit interests, which can include furthering
those interests through litigation. When considering fee issues,
components will determine, whenever reasonably possible, the use to
which a requester will put the requested records. When it appears that
the requester will put the records to a commercial use, either because
of the nature of the request
[[Page 7677]]
itself or because a component has reasonable cause to doubt a
requester's stated use, the component will provide the requester a
reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification.
(g) Educational institution means an institution which:
(1) Is a preschool, public or private elementary or secondary
school, an institution of undergraduate higher education, an
institution of graduate higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution of vocational education; or
(2) Operates a program or programs of scholarly research. To
qualify under this definition, the program of scholarly research in
connection with which the information is sought must be carried out
under the auspices of the academic institution itself as opposed to the
individual scholarly pursuits of persons affiliated with an
institution. For example, a request from a professor predicated upon
research funding granted to the institution would meet its
requirements. A request from a professor seeking information that will
assist in the writing of a book, independent of his or her
institutional responsibilities, would not qualify under this
definition.
(h) Non-commercial scientific institution means an institution that
is not operated on a commercial basis and that is operated solely for
the purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are
not intended to promote any particular product or industry.
(i) Representative of the news media means any person or entity
that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the
public, uses its editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work to an audience. Examples of
news media entities include television or radio stations that broadcast
``news'' to the public at large and publishers of periodicals that
disseminate ``news'' and make their products available through a
variety of means to the general public, as well as news organizations
that operate solely on the internet. Alternative media may be
considered to be news media entities. These examples are not all
inclusive.
(1) Factors indicating status as a news media representative
include press accreditation, guild membership, a history of continuing
publication, business registration, and/or Federal Communication
Commission licensing, among others.
(2) For purposes of this definition, news contemplates information
that is about current events or that would be of current interest to
the public.
(3) A freelance journalist will be treated as a representative of
the news media if the person can demonstrate a solid basis for
expecting publication of matters related to the requested information
through a news media entity. A publication contract with a news media
entity satisfies this requirement. An individual's past publication
record with such organizations is also relevant in making this
determination.
Sec. 70.39 Statutes specifically providing for setting of fees.
This subpart will not apply to fees charged under any statute,
other than the FOIA, that specifically requires an agency to set and
collect fees for particular types of records.
Sec. 70.40 Charges assessed for the production of records.
(a) General. Components shall charge for processing requests under
the FOIA in accordance with the provisions of this section and with the
OMB Guidelines. In order to resolve any fee issues that arise under
this section, a component may contact a requester for additional
information. Components will ensure that searches, review, and
duplication are conducted in the most efficient and least expensive
manner. A component ordinarily will collect all applicable fees before
sending copies of records to the requester.
(b) Types of charges. There are three types of charges assessed in
connection with the production of records in response to a request,
specifically, charges for costs associated with:
(1) Searching for or locating responsive records (search costs),
(2) Duplicating such records (duplication costs), and
(3) Reviewing records to determine whether any materials are exempt
(review costs).
(c) Types of requesters. (1) There are four types of requesters:
(i) Commercial use requesters,
(ii) Educational and non-commercial scientific institutions,
(iii) Representatives of the news media, and
(iv) All other requesters.
(2) Depending upon the type of requester, as set forth in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, the charges outlined in paragraph (d) of this
section may be assessed.
(d) Types of charges that will be assessed for each type of
request--(1) Commercial use request. When a requester makes a
commercial use request, search costs, duplication costs and review
costs will be assessed in their entirety.
(2) Educational or non-commercial scientific institution request.
When an educational or non-commercial scientific institution makes a
request, only duplication costs will be assessed, excluding charges for
the first 100 pages.
(3) Request by representative of news media. When a representative
of the news media makes a request, only duplication costs will be
assessed, excluding charges for the first 100 pages.
(4) All other requesters. Requesters making a request which does
not fall within paragraph (d)(1), (2), or (3) of this section will be
charged search costs and duplication costs, except that the first 100
pages of duplication and the first two hours of search time will be
furnished without charge. Where computer searches are involved, the
monetary equivalent of two hours of search time by a professional
employee will be deducted from the total cost of computer processing
time.
(e) Charges for each type of activity--(1) Search costs. (i) When a
search for records is performed by a clerical employee, a rate of $5.00
per quarter hour will be applicable. When a search is performed by
professional or supervisory personnel, a rate of $10.00 per quarter
hour will be applicable. Components will charge for time spent
searching even if they do not locate any responsive records or they
withhold the records located as exempt from disclosure.
(ii) For computer searches of records, requesters will be charged
the direct costs of conducting the search, except as provided in
paragraph (e)(4) of this section.
(2) Duplication costs. The standard copying charge for records in
black and white paper copy is $0.15 per page. This charge includes the
operator's time to duplicate the record. When responsive information is
provided in a format other than 8\1/2\ x 11 or 11 x 14 inch black and
white paper copy, such as computer tapes, disks and color copies, the
requester may be charged the direct costs of the tape, disk, audio-
visual or whatever medium is used to produce the information, as well
as the direct cost of duplication, including operator time.
(3) Review costs. Costs associated with the review of records, as
defined in Sec. 70.38(e), will be charged for work performed by a
clerical employee at a rate of $5.00 per quarter hour when applicable.
When professional or supervisory personnel perform work, a rate of
$10.00 per quarter hour will be charged, when applicable. Except as
noted in this paragraph, charges may
[[Page 7678]]
only be assessed for review the first time the records are analyzed to
determine the applicability of specific exemptions to the particular
record or portion of the record. Thus a requester would not be charged
for review at the administrative appeal level with regard to the
applicability of an exemption already applied at the initial level.
When, however, a record has been withheld pursuant to an exemption
which is subsequently determined not to apply and is reviewed again at
the appellate level to determine the potential applicability of other
exemptions, the costs attendant to such additional review will be
assessed.
(4) Limitations on charging fees. If a component fails to comply
with the time limits in which to respond to a request, it shall not
assess certain fees except:
(i) If there are unusual circumstances (as that term is defined in
Sec. 70.25(c)) and the component has provided timely written notice,
the component is permitted ten additional days to respond to the
request. After the expiration of the ten additional days, the component
is no longer permitted to assess search fees or, in the instances of
requests from requesters described in Sec. 70.38(h) and (i),
duplication fees except as described in paragraph (e)(4)(ii) of this
section.
(ii) If there are unusual circumstances (as that term is defined in
Sec. 70.25(c)), and more than 5,000 pages of documents are necessary
to respond to the request, the component may continue to charge
assessable fees for as long as it takes to process the request,
provided that the component has provided timely written notice and
discussed with the requester via telephone, email, or written mail (or
made at least three good-faith attempts to do so) how the requester
could effectively limit the scope of the pending request.
(iii) If a court has determined that exceptional circumstances
exist, as defined in the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(6)(C) the agency's
failure to comply with any time limits of the FOIA are excused for the
length of time provided by the court order.
(5) Mailing cost. Where responses are sent by mail, no postage
charge will be made for transmitting by regular mail a single copy of
the requested record to the requester, or for mailing additional copies
where the total postage cost does not exceed $5.00. However, where the
volume of paper or other produced material or the requested method of
transmittal requested is in excess of $5.00, the transmittal costs will
be added.
(f) Aggregating requests for purposes of assessing costs. (1) Where
a component reasonably believes that a requester or a group of
requesters acting together is attempting to divide a request into a
series of requests for the purpose of avoiding fees, the disclosure
officer may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly.
(2) Components may presume that multiple requests of this type made
within a 30-day period have been submitted in order to avoid fees.
Where requests are separated by a longer period, disclosure officers
will aggregate them only where a solid basis exists for determining
that aggregation is warranted under all of the circumstances involved.
Multiple requests involving unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(g) Interest charges. Components will assess interest on an unpaid
bill starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the
requester. Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31
U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until payment
is received by the component. Components will follow the provisions of
the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as
amended, and its administrative procedures, including the use of
consumer reporting agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Authentication of copies--(1) Fees. The FOIA does not require
certification or attestation under seal of copies of records provided
in accordance with its provisions. Pursuant to provisions of the
general user-charger statute, 31 U.S.C. 9701 and Subchapter II of title
29 U.S.C., the following charges will be made when, upon request, such
services are rendered by the agency in its discretion:
(i) For certification of true copies, $10.00 each certification.
(ii) For attestation under the seal of the Department, $10.00 each
attestation under seal.
(2) Authority and form for attestation under seal. Authority is
hereby given to any officer or officers of the Department of Labor
designated as authentication officer or officers of the Department to
sign and issue attestations under the seal of the Department of Labor.
(i) Transcripts. Fees for transcripts of an agency proceeding, as
defined in the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 5521(12) will be
assessed in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.
(j) Privacy Act requesters. A request from an individual or on
behalf of an individual for a record maintained by that individual's
name or other unique identifier which is contained within a component's
system of records, will be treated under the fee provisions at 29 CFR
71.6.
Sec. 70.41 Waiver or reduction of fees.
(a) Requirements for waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records
responsive to a request will be furnished without charge or at a charge
reduced below that established under Sec. 70.40(e) of this subpart,
where a component determines, based on all available information, that
the requester has demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government, and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the requirement of paragraph (a)(1)(i) of
this section is met, components will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed:
Whether the disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding
of government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an
increased public understanding of those operations or activities. The
disclosure of information that already is in the public domain, in
either a duplicative or a substantially identical form, would not be as
likely to contribute to such understanding where nothing new would be
added to the public's understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.'' The
disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the subject, as opposed to the
individual understanding of the requester. A requester's expertise in
the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey
information to the public will be considered. It will be presumed that
a representative of the
[[Page 7679]]
news media will satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to the
public understanding of government operations or activities. The
public's understanding of the subject in question must be enhanced by
the disclosure to a significant extent.
(3) To determine whether the requirement of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of
this section is met, components will consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. The component will consider any commercial
interest of the requester (with reference to the definition of
``commercial use request'' in Sec. 70.38(f) of this subpart), or of
any person on whose behalf the requester may be acting, that would be
furthered by the requested disclosure. Requesters will be given an
opportunity in the administrative process to provide explanatory
information regarding this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. The component
ordinarily will presume that where a news media requester has satisfied
the public interest standard, the public interest will be the interest
primarily served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure to data
brokers or others who merely compile and market government information
for direct economic return will not be presumed to primarily serve the
public interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to be released satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted only for
those records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraph (a) of this section, insofar as they apply
to each request.
(b) Submission. Requests for a waiver or reduction of fees should
be made when the request is first submitted to the component and should
address the criteria referenced above. A requester may submit a fee
waiver request at a later time so long as the underlying record request
is pending or on administrative appeal. When a requester who has
committed to pay fees subsequently asks for a waiver of those fees and
that waiver is denied, the requester will be required to pay any costs
incurred up to the date the fee waiver request was received.
(c) Appeal rights. Requesters dissatisfied with treatment of fee
waiver or reduction requests may follow the procedures for appeal under
Sections 70.22 and 70.23.
Sec. 70.42 Consent to pay fees.
(a) The Department will not assess or collect fees where the fee to
be assessed, after deducting any free pages and/or search time, is less
than $25.00. When making a request, a requester may specify a
willingness to pay up to a certain amount, e.g., $50.00 or $200.
(b) No request will be processed if a component reasonably believes
that the fees are likely to exceed the amount to which the requester
has originally consented, absent supplemental written consent by the
requester to proceed after being notified of this determination.
(c) When a component determines or estimates that the fees to be
assessed in accordance with this section will exceed $25.00, the
component shall notify the requester of the actual or estimated amount
of the fees, including a breakdown of the fees for search, review or
duplication, unless the requester has indicated a willingness to pay
fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion of the fee can be
estimated readily, the component must advise the requester accordingly.
Such notice may invite the requester to reformulate the request to
satisfy his or her needs at a lower cost.
(d) Components must make available their FOIA contact to assist any
requester in reformulating a request to meet the requester's needs at a
lower cost.
Sec. 70.43 Payment of fees.
(a) De minimis costs. As noted in Sec. 70.42(a) of this subpart,
the Department has determined it will not assess or collect fees below
$25.00. In these cases, the cost of collecting and processing a fee
equals or exceeds the amount of the fee which would otherwise be
assessed. The Department will assess fees where the costs to be
assessed, after deduction of any free pages and/or search time, is
$25.00 or higher.
(b) How payment will be made. Requesters will pay fees assessed by
check or money order made payable to the Treasury of the United States,
and sent to the component that is processing the request.
(c) Advance payments and billing. (1) Prior to beginning to process
a request, the component will make a preliminary assessment of the
amount that can properly be charged to the requester for search and
review time and copying costs. Where a component determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged under this section will be
more than $250.00, the component will require the requester to make an
advance payment of an amount up to the entire anticipated fee before
beginning to process the request. The component may waive the advance
payment where the component receives a satisfactory assurance of full
payment from a requester who has a history of prompt payment of an
amount similar to the one anticipated by the request.
(2) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged FOIA fee to any component of the Department of Labor within 30
days of the date of billing, a component will require the requester to
pay the full amount due, plus any applicable interest as provided in
Sec. 70.40(f) and to make an advance payment of the full amount of any
anticipated fee, before the component begins to process a new request
or appeal or continues to process a pending request or appeal from that
requester.
(3) For a request other than those described in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (2) of this section, a component will not require the requester to
make an advance payment before beginning to process a request. Payment
owed for work already completed on a request pursuant to consent of the
requester is not an advance payment and a component may require the
requester to make a payment for such work prior to releasing any
records to the requester.
(d) Time limits to respond extended when advance payments are
requested. When a component has requested an advance payment of fees in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, the time limits
prescribed in Sec. 70.25 will only begin to run after the component has
received the advance payment.
Sec. 70.44 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this subpart will be construed to entitle any person, as
of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any records to which
such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
[[Page 7680]]
Sec. Sec. 70.45-70.52 [Reserved]
Subpart D--Public Records and Filings
Sec. 70.53 Office of Labor-Management Standards.
(a) The following documents in the custody of the Office of Labor-
Management Standards are public information available for inspection
and/or purchase of copies in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of
this section.
(1) Data and information contained in any report or other document
filed pursuant to sections 201, 202, 203, 211, 301 of the Labor-
Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (73 Stat. 524-28, 530,
79 Stat. 888, 73 Stat. 530, 29 U.S.C. 431-433, 441, 461).
(2) Data and information contained in any report or other document
filed pursuant to the reporting requirements of 29 CFR part 458, which
are the regulations implementing the standards of conduct provisions of
the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 7120, and the Foreign
Service Act of 1980, 22 U.S.C. 4117. The reporting requirements are
found in 29 CFR 458.3.
(3) Data and information contained in any report or other document
filed pursuant to the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, 2
U.S.C. 1351, 109 Stat. 19.
(b) The documents listed in paragraph (a) of this section are
available from: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Labor-Management
Standards, Public Disclosure Room, N-1519, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Reports filed pursuant to section 201 of the
Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 and pursuant to
29 CFR 458.3 implementing the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 and the
Foreign Service Act of 1980 for the year 2000 and thereafter are also
available at https://www.union-reports.dol.gov.
(c) Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 435(c) which provides that the Secretary
will by regulation provide for the furnishing of copies of the
documents listed in paragraph (a) of this section, upon payment of a
charge based upon the cost of the service, these documents are
available at a cost of $ .15 per page for record copies furnished.
Authentication of copies is available in accordance with the fee
schedule established in Sec. 70.40. In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)(vi), the provisions for fees, fee waivers and fee
reductions in subpart C of this part do not supersede these charges for
these documents.
(d) Upon request of the Governor of a State for copies of any
reports or documents filed pursuant to sections 201, 202, 203, or 211
of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (73 Stat.
524-528, 79 Stat. 888; 29 U.S.C. 431-433, 441), or for information
contained therein, which have been filed by any person whose principal
place of business or headquarters is in such State, the Office of
Labor-Management Standards will:
(1) Make available without payment of a charge to the State agency
designated by law or by such Governor, such requested copies of
information and data, or
(2) Require the person who filed such reports and documents to
furnish such copies or information and data directly to the State
agency thus designated.
Sec. 70.54 Employee Benefits Security Administration.
(a) The annual financial reports (Form 5500) and attachments/
schedules as filed by employee benefit plans under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) are in the custody of the
Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) at the address
indicated in paragraph (b) of this section, and the right to inspect
and copy such reports, as authorized under ERISA, at the fees set forth
in this part, may be exercised at such office.
(b) The mailing address for the documents described in this section
is: U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Public Documents Room, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Appendix A to Part 70--FOIA Components
The following list identifies the individual agency components
of the Department of Labor for the purposes of the FOIA. Each
component is responsible for making records in its custody available
for inspection and copying, in accordance with the provisions of the
FOIA and this part. Unless otherwise specified, the mailing
addresses for the following national office components are listed
below. Updated contact information for national and regional offices
can be found on the DOL Web site at https://www.dol.gov/dol/foia.
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Avenue NW.
Washington, DC 20210.
1. Office of the Secretary (OSEC).
2. Office of the Solicitor (SOL).
3. Office of Administrative Law Judges (ALJ), 800 K Street NW.,
Suite N-400, Washington, DC 20001-8002.
4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and
Management (OASAM).
5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy (OASP).
6. Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO).
7. Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs (OCIA).
8. Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP).
9. Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).
10. Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
11. Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS).
12. Office of Public Affairs (OPA).
13. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP).
14. Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB).
15. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), Postal Square Building,
Room 4040, 2 Massachusetts Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20212-0001.
16. Employment and Training Administration (ETA). Job Corps
(part of ETA).
17. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), 201 12th
Street, South, Arlington, Virginia 22202.
18. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
19. Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA).
20. Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS).
21. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board (ECAB).
22. Administrative Review Board (ARB).
23. Benefits Review Board (BRB).
24. Wage and Hour Division (WHD).
25. Women's Bureau (WB).
Appendix B to Part 70--[Reserved]
Thomas E. Perez,
Secretary of Labor .
[FR Doc. 2017-00453 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P