Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews, 4291-4294 [2017-00654]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Shaoxing Andrew Metal Manufactured
Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Dingli Metal Clotheshorse Co.
Ltd.
Shaoxing Gangyuan Metal Manufactured
Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products
Co., Ltd.
Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured
Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Meideli Hanger Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co.,
Ltd.
Shaoxing Shuren Tie Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Tongzhou Metal Manufactured
Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured
Co. Ltd.
Shaoxing Zhongdi Foreign Trade Co.
Ltd.
Tianjin Innovation International
Tianjin Tailai Import and Export Co. Ltd.
Wahfay Industrial (Group) Co., Ltd.
Wesken International (Kunshan) Co. Ltd.
Xia Fang Hanger (Cambodia) Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Hongfei Plastic Industry Co.
Ltd.
Zhejiang Jaguar Import & Export Co. Ltd.
Zhejiang Lucky Cloud Hanger Co. Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2017–00667 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–703]
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
From Italy: Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2015–
2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on granular
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) resin
from Italy, for the period of review
(POR) August 1, 2015, through July 18,
2016, based on the timely withdrawal of
request for review by Polis S.r.l., (Polis).
DATES: Effective January 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aimee Phelan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0697.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On August 5, 2016, the Department
published the notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping order on granular PTFE
resin from Italy for the POR August 1,
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party or parties that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. As
noted above, Polis withdrew its request
for review within the 90-day period. No
other party requested a review and,
therefore, the Department is rescinding
this administrative review.
Assessment
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
2015, through July 31, 2016.1 On August
31, 2016, Polis, an Italian exporter of
granular PTFE resin requested that the
Department conduct an administrative
review of itself.2 On October 14, 2016,
the Department initiated an
administrative review for the POR
August 1, 2015, through July 18, 2016,
pursuant to Polis’ request.3 On October
14, 2016, Polis timely withdrew its
request for an administrative review.4
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 51850,
51851 (August 5, 2016) (Opportunity Notice). On
August 11, 2016, the Department revoked the
antidumping duty order on Granular
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy, effective
July 18, 2016. See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene
Resin from Italy: Final Results of Sunset Review and
Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, 81 FR
53119 (August 11, 2016). Although the Opportunity
Notice identified the POR as August 1, 2015,
through July 31, 2016, in light of the revocation of
the order, effective July 18, 2016, the POR would
be August 1, 2015, through July 18, 2016. See
Memorandum to the File, re: ‘‘Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Granular
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin (PTFE) From Italy’’
dated September 8, 2016.
2 See letter from Polis, re: ‘‘Polis Srl Request for
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin
(PTFE) From Italy (A–475–703)’’ dated August 31,
2016.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
71061 (October 14, 2016).
4 See letter from Polis, re: ‘‘Polis Srl Withdrawal
of Administrative Review Request of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Granular
Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin (PTFE) From Italy
(A–475–703)’’ dated October 14, 2016.
Frm 00013
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under an APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 35l.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 9, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2017–00736 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of granular PTFE
resin from Italy. For Polis, antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time
of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
PO 00000
4291
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–475–818; C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
On June 22, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published its initiation and
preliminary results in these changed
circumstances reviews. Based on our
analysis of the comments submitted by
interested parties, our final results
remain unchanged from the preliminary
results.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective January 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Shore, Office I for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482–2778; George
McMahon, Office III for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482–1167; or Renee
D’Antonio, Customs Liaison Unit for
AD/CVD Operations, at (202) 482–1318,
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement &
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4292
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
Background
On June 22, 2016, the Department
published a notice of Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews 1 on certain
pasta from Italy (1) in furtherance of the
International Trade Data System (ITDS)
initiative and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection’s (CBP) efforts to modernize
the electronic submission of import
documents using the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE), and (2)
to align the scope language regarding
certifications accompanying imports of
organic pasta across the AD/CVD Italy
Pasta Orders.2
Specifically, the Department
preliminarily determined to: (1) Convert
the organic pasta certification
submission requirement to a recordkeeping requirement and to adjust the
scope exclusion language to reflect this
change, (2) authorize electronic
submission of the certification when the
certificate is requested by CBP or the
Department, (3) update the scope
language to remove the reference to the
National Organic Program certificate,
and (4) to align the certification
language across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders to reflect that the same
certification authority (or authorities) is
acceptable for purposes of both orders.
Since the publication of the Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews, the Department
received a single case brief, filed on July
6, 2016, on behalf of American Italian
Pasta Company, Dakota Growers Pasta
Company and New World Pasta
Company (Petitioners). No interested
party submitted a rebuttal brief.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Orders
The scope of these orders covers
shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta
in packages of five pounds four ounces
or less, whether or not enriched or
fortified or containing milk or other
optional ingredients such as chopped
vegetables, vegetable purees, milk,
gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and
flavorings, and up to two percent egg
1 See Certain Pasta from Italy: Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews, 81 FR 40659 (June 22, 2016) (Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews).
2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from Italy, 61 FR
38547 (July 24, 1996); and Notice of Countervailing
Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta
(‘‘Pasta’’) from Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996)
(collectively, AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
In their July 6, 2016, case brief,
Petitioners agree with the Department’s
revision of the organic pasta exclusion
to harmonize the scope language
regarding certifications concerning
imports of organic pasta across the AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders. Petitioners,
however, express concern regarding the
Department’s proposal to replace the
requirement to file the organic
certification at entry with a recordkeeping requirement. Petitioners argue
that because organic pasta is an
excluded product, an exporter or
importer dealing exclusively with
organic pasta might never become
subject to the Department’s jurisdiction
in an administrative review or other
segment and would therefore, never be
required to produce the certification.
Additionally, Petitioners note that, at
the outset of the Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews, the Department
indicated it was initiating a changed
circumstances review to change the
requirement to submit an organic
certification at entry to a record-keeping
requirement and to allow for electronic
submission of the document. However,
the Department did not further discuss
the possible electronic submission
requirement or how it would work.
Petitioners suggest that in lieu of, or
in addition to, the record-keeping
requirement, the Department should
require importers to scan electronically
and submit the organic certification
using the Document Imaging System
(DIS) in ACE so that the certification
will be attached to each relevant entry.
Petitioners conclude that the
Department would have access to the
certifications if the Department obtained
copies of entry packages from CBP.
Department’s Position
The Department considered the
comments submitted by Petitioners and
continues to find that it is appropriate
to convert the current requirement to
submit the organic certification at entry
to a record-keeping requirement.
Petitioners have not provided any
information to indicate that enforcement
of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders would
be compromised by such a change.
Under the record keeping requirement
described in the preliminary results,
both the exporter and the importer
would be required to maintain a copy of
the original certification in their
respective records, as well as
documentation supporting the
certification, that would be subject to
verification by the U.S. Government.4
With respect to our statement in the
summary of the Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews regarding
authorization for electronic submission
of the certification, this was meant to
refer to one manner through which a
party could submit a certification, once
requested by the Department or CBP.
CBP or the Department may request that
the certification and/or supporting
documentation be submitted
electronically, through the DIS
component of ACE or in some other
form or manner as required by the
requesting agency. As further discussed
in the Initiation and Preliminary Results
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews,
should the Department or CBP have
concerns about entries of pasta, either
agency, or both agencies, may require
submission of the certifications to
substantiate a party’s claim that the
imported pasta meets the requirements
of the organic pasta exclusion. As such,
the importer, or the party filing on its
behalf, would be required to submit the
organic pasta certification upon request
by CBP or the Department.
Absent evidence that the organic
pasta certification record-keeping
requirement undermines the
enforcement of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders, and because this change furthers
the ITDS initiative and CBP’s efforts to
modernize the electronic submission of
import documents using ACE, we find
that it is appropriate to adopt the
organic pasta certification recordkeeping requirement. However, this
Notice should not be construed as an
indication that the Department
relinquishes its ability to require the
3 For a full description of the scope of these AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders, see the Appendix to this
Notice.
4 See Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews, 81 FR at 40660.
white. The pasta covered by the scope
of these Orders is typically sold in the
retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or
polypropylene bags of varying
dimensions.3
The merchandise subject to the AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders is currently
classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95
and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and Customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to these Orders is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
filing of the organic certification for
each entry of pasta subject to the AD/
CVD Italy Pasta Orders. If, at any time,
either CBP or the Department becomes
aware of evidence indicating that the
elimination of the requirement to file
the organic certification with each entry
is undermining the enforcement of the
AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders, the
Department can reconsider whether to
require that the organic certification be
filed with each entry, using the DIS for
entries filed in ACE or through other
means as appropriate.
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Review
After an analysis of the comments
submitted, we continue to find that the
organic pasta certification submission
requirement should be converted to a
record-keeping requirement. Under this
record-keeping requirement, both the
exporter and the importer are required
to maintain a copy of the original EU
authorized body certification in their
respective records, as well as
documentation supporting the
certification, that would be subject to
verification by the U.S. Government.
Because this certification requirement
will now be a record-keeping
requirement, the exporter and importer
are required to submit the certification
in response to a request from CBP or the
Department, in the form or manner
required by the requesting agency (i.e.,
electronically or otherwise).
Additionally, the certification must be
issued, signed, and dated prior to the
exportation of the merchandise from
Italy. Entries for which an exporter or
importer is unable to produce the
required certification and/or
documentation supporting the
certification upon the request of CBP or
the Department may be subject to
antidumping or countervailing duties.
In addition, we continue to find that
the scope language relating to the
organic pasta exclusion should be
updated to: (1) Reflect the conversion to
a record-keeping requirement; (2)
remove the reference to the National
Organic Program certificate; and (3)
align the certification language across
the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to reflect
that the same certification authority is
acceptable for purposes of both orders.
Based on the foregoing, the Department
adopts the revised scope of the AD/CVD
Italy Pasta Orders to reflect the
aforementioned changes. The full text of
the revised scopes is found in the
Appendix to this document.
Notification to Parties
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
These final results are being issued
and published in accordance with
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended and 19
CFR 351.216 and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the AD Order on Certain Pasta
From Italy
Imports covered by this Order are
shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta in
packages of five pounds four ounces or less,
whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional ingredients
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable
purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins,
coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the
scope of the Order is typically sold in the
retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene
bags of varying dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are
refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as well
as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception
of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two
percent egg white. Multicolored pasta,
imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or
paraffin and bound with raffia, is excluded
from the scope of the Order. Note 1. Pursuant
to the Department’s August 14, 2009,
changed circumstances review, effective July
1, 2008, gluten free pasta is also excluded
from the scope of the Order. Note 2. Effective
January 1, 2012, ravioli and tortellini filled
with cheese and/or vegetables are also
excluded from the scope of the Order. Note
3.
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta
from Italy that are certified by an EU
authorized body in accordance with the
United States Department of Agriculture’s
National Organic Program for organic
products. The organic pasta certification
must be retained by exporters and importers
and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of
Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is
currently classifiable under items
1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and Customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise subject to the
Order is dispositive.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4293
Note 1. See Memorandum to Richard
Moreland, dated August 25, 1997, which is
on file in the Central Records Unit.
Note 2. See Certain Pasta From Italy:
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Changed Circumstances Review and
Revocation, in Part, 74 FR 41120 (August 14,
2009).
Note 3. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews and Revocation, in Part, 79 FR
58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014).
Scope of the CVD Order on Certain Pasta
From Italy
Imports covered by this Order are
shipments of certain non-egg dry pasta in
packages of five pounds four ounces or less,
whether or not enriched or fortified or
containing milk or other optional ingredients
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable
purees, milk, gluten, diastasis, vitamins,
coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the
scope of the Order is typically sold in the
retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene
bags of varying dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are
refrigerated, frozen, or canned pastas, as well
as all forms of egg pasta, with the exception
of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two
percent egg white. Multicolored pasta,
imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or
paraffin and bound with raffia, is excluded
from the scope of the Order. Note 1. Pursuant
to the Department’s May 12, 2011, changed
circumstances review, effective January 1,
2009, gluten free pasta is also excluded from
the scope of the Order. Note 2. Effective
January 1, 2012, ravioli and tortellini filled
with cheese and/or vegetables are also
excluded from the scope of the Order. Note
3.
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta
from Italy that are certified by an EU
authorized body in accordance with the
United States Department of Agriculture’s
National Organic Program for organic
products. The organic pasta certification
must be retained by exporters and importers
and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of
Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is
currently classifiable under items
1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and Customs purposes, the written
description of the merchandise subject to the
Order is dispositive.
Note 1. See Memorandum to Richard
Moreland, dated August 25, 1997, which is
on file in the CRU.
Note 2. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Review and Revocation, In
Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
Note 3. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty and
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
4294
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2017 / Notices
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews and Revocation, in Part, 79 FR
58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014).
[FR Doc. 2017–00654 Filed 1–12–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) has received
requests to conduct administrative
reviews of various antidumping and
countervailing duty orders and findings
with November anniversary dates. In
accordance with the Department’s
regulations, we are initiating those
administrative reviews.
DATES: Effective January 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Department has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), for administrative reviews of
various antidumping and countervailing
duty orders and findings with
November anniversary dates.
All deadlines for the submission of
various types of information,
certifications, or comments or actions by
the Department discussed below refer to
the number of calendar days from the
applicable starting time.
Notice of No Sales
If a producer or exporter named in
this notice of initiation had no exports,
sales, or entries during the period of
review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the
Department within 30 days of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. All submissions must be filed
electronically at https://access.trade.gov
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1
Such submissions are subject to
verification in accordance with section
782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:06 Jan 12, 2017
Jkt 241001
amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i),
a copy must be served on every party on
the Department’s service list.
Respondent Selection
In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We
intend to place the CBP data on the
record within five days of publication of
the initiation notice and to make our
decision regarding respondent selection
within 30 days of publication of the
initiation Federal Register notice.
Comments regarding the CBP data and
respondent selection should be
submitted seven days after the
placement of the CBP data on the record
of this review. Parties wishing to submit
rebuttal comments should submit those
comments five days after the deadline
for the initial comments.
In the event the Department decides
it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, the Department has found
that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, the Department
will not conduct collapsing analyses at
the respondent selection phase of this
review and will not collapse companies
at the respondent selection phase unless
there has been a determination to
collapse certain companies in a
previous segment of this antidumping
proceeding (i.e., investigation,
administrative review, new shipper
review or changed circumstances
review). For any company subject to this
review, if the Department determined,
or continued to treat, that company as
collapsed with others, the Department
will assume that such companies
continue to operate in the same manner
and will collapse them for respondent
selection purposes. Otherwise, the
Department will not collapse companies
for purposes of respondent selection.
Parties are requested to (a) identify
which companies subject to review
previously were collapsed, and (b)
provide a citation to the proceeding in
which they were collapsed. Further, if
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
companies are requested to complete
the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’)
Questionnaire for purposes of
respondent selection, in general each
company must report volume and value
data separately for itself. Parties should
not include data for any other party,
even if they believe they should be
treated as a single entity with that other
party. If a company was collapsed with
another company or companies in the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding where the Department
considered collapsing that entity,
complete Q&V data for that collapsed
entity must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that has requested a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that the Department
may extend this time if it is reasonable
to do so. In order to provide parties
additional certainty with respect to
when the Department will exercise its
discretion to extend this 90-day
deadline, interested parties are advised
that the Department does not intend to
extend the 90-day deadline unless the
requestor demonstrates that an
extraordinary circumstance has
prevented it from submitting a timely
withdrawal request. Determinations by
the Department to extend the 90-day
deadline will be made on a case-by-case
basis.
Separate Rates
In proceedings involving non-market
economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the
Department begins with a rebuttable
presumption that all companies within
the country are subject to government
control and, thus, should be assigned a
single antidumping duty deposit rate. It
is the Department’s policy to assign all
exporters of merchandise subject to an
administrative review in an NME
country this single rate unless an
exporter can demonstrate that it is
sufficiently independent so as to be
entitled to a separate rate.
To establish whether a firm is
sufficiently independent from
government control of its export
activities to be entitled to a separate
rate, the Department analyzes each
entity exporting the subject
merchandise under a test arising from
the Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the
People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588
(May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the
E:\FR\FM\13JAN1.SGM
13JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4291-4294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00654]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-475-818; C-475-819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 22, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published its initiation and preliminary results in these changed
circumstances reviews. Based on our analysis of the comments submitted
by interested parties, our final results remain unchanged from the
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective January 13, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Shore, Office I for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482-2778; George McMahon, Office III for AD/CVD
Operations, at (202) 482-1167; or Renee D'Antonio, Customs Liaison Unit
for AD/CVD Operations, at (202) 482-1318, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement & Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 4292]]
Background
On June 22, 2016, the Department published a notice of Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews \1\ on certain pasta from Italy (1) in
furtherance of the International Trade Data System (ITDS) initiative
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP) efforts to modernize the
electronic submission of import documents using the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE), and (2) to align the scope language
regarding certifications accompanying imports of organic pasta across
the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Pasta from Italy: Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews, 81 FR 40659 (June 22, 2016) (Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews).
\2\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Pasta from
Italy, 61 FR 38547 (July 24, 1996); and Notice of Countervailing
Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination: Certain Pasta (``Pasta'') from Italy, 61 FR 38544
(July 24, 1996) (collectively, AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Department preliminarily determined to: (1)
Convert the organic pasta certification submission requirement to a
record-keeping requirement and to adjust the scope exclusion language
to reflect this change, (2) authorize electronic submission of the
certification when the certificate is requested by CBP or the
Department, (3) update the scope language to remove the reference to
the National Organic Program certificate, and (4) to align the
certification language across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to reflect
that the same certification authority (or authorities) is acceptable
for purposes of both orders. Since the publication of the Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews, the Department received a single case brief,
filed on July 6, 2016, on behalf of American Italian Pasta Company,
Dakota Growers Pasta Company and New World Pasta Company (Petitioners).
No interested party submitted a rebuttal brief.
Scope of the Orders
The scope of these orders covers shipments of certain non-egg dry
pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or not
enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional ingredients
such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk, gluten, diastasis,
vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two percent egg white. The
pasta covered by the scope of these Orders is typically sold in the
retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard cartons, or polyethylene or
polypropylene bags of varying dimensions.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a full description of the scope of these AD/CVD Italy
Pasta Orders, see the Appendix to this Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders is
currently classifiable under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes,
the written description of the merchandise subject to these Orders is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
In their July 6, 2016, case brief, Petitioners agree with the
Department's revision of the organic pasta exclusion to harmonize the
scope language regarding certifications concerning imports of organic
pasta across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders. Petitioners, however,
express concern regarding the Department's proposal to replace the
requirement to file the organic certification at entry with a record-
keeping requirement. Petitioners argue that because organic pasta is an
excluded product, an exporter or importer dealing exclusively with
organic pasta might never become subject to the Department's
jurisdiction in an administrative review or other segment and would
therefore, never be required to produce the certification.
Additionally, Petitioners note that, at the outset of the Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews, the Department indicated it was initiating a
changed circumstances review to change the requirement to submit an
organic certification at entry to a record-keeping requirement and to
allow for electronic submission of the document. However, the
Department did not further discuss the possible electronic submission
requirement or how it would work.
Petitioners suggest that in lieu of, or in addition to, the record-
keeping requirement, the Department should require importers to scan
electronically and submit the organic certification using the Document
Imaging System (DIS) in ACE so that the certification will be attached
to each relevant entry. Petitioners conclude that the Department would
have access to the certifications if the Department obtained copies of
entry packages from CBP.
Department's Position
The Department considered the comments submitted by Petitioners and
continues to find that it is appropriate to convert the current
requirement to submit the organic certification at entry to a record-
keeping requirement. Petitioners have not provided any information to
indicate that enforcement of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders would be
compromised by such a change. Under the record keeping requirement
described in the preliminary results, both the exporter and the
importer would be required to maintain a copy of the original
certification in their respective records, as well as documentation
supporting the certification, that would be subject to verification by
the U.S. Government.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews, 81 FR at 40660.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to our statement in the summary of the Initiation and
Preliminary Results of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews regarding authorization for electronic submission
of the certification, this was meant to refer to one manner through
which a party could submit a certification, once requested by the
Department or CBP. CBP or the Department may request that the
certification and/or supporting documentation be submitted
electronically, through the DIS component of ACE or in some other form
or manner as required by the requesting agency. As further discussed in
the Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews, should the
Department or CBP have concerns about entries of pasta, either agency,
or both agencies, may require submission of the certifications to
substantiate a party's claim that the imported pasta meets the
requirements of the organic pasta exclusion. As such, the importer, or
the party filing on its behalf, would be required to submit the organic
pasta certification upon request by CBP or the Department.
Absent evidence that the organic pasta certification record-keeping
requirement undermines the enforcement of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta
Orders, and because this change furthers the ITDS initiative and CBP's
efforts to modernize the electronic submission of import documents
using ACE, we find that it is appropriate to adopt the organic pasta
certification record-keeping requirement. However, this Notice should
not be construed as an indication that the Department relinquishes its
ability to require the
[[Page 4293]]
filing of the organic certification for each entry of pasta subject to
the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders. If, at any time, either CBP or the
Department becomes aware of evidence indicating that the elimination of
the requirement to file the organic certification with each entry is
undermining the enforcement of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders, the
Department can reconsider whether to require that the organic
certification be filed with each entry, using the DIS for entries filed
in ACE or through other means as appropriate.
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review
After an analysis of the comments submitted, we continue to find
that the organic pasta certification submission requirement should be
converted to a record-keeping requirement. Under this record-keeping
requirement, both the exporter and the importer are required to
maintain a copy of the original EU authorized body certification in
their respective records, as well as documentation supporting the
certification, that would be subject to verification by the U.S.
Government. Because this certification requirement will now be a
record-keeping requirement, the exporter and importer are required to
submit the certification in response to a request from CBP or the
Department, in the form or manner required by the requesting agency
(i.e., electronically or otherwise). Additionally, the certification
must be issued, signed, and dated prior to the exportation of the
merchandise from Italy. Entries for which an exporter or importer is
unable to produce the required certification and/or documentation
supporting the certification upon the request of CBP or the Department
may be subject to antidumping or countervailing duties.
In addition, we continue to find that the scope language relating
to the organic pasta exclusion should be updated to: (1) Reflect the
conversion to a record-keeping requirement; (2) remove the reference to
the National Organic Program certificate; and (3) align the
certification language across the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to reflect
that the same certification authority is acceptable for purposes of
both orders. Based on the foregoing, the Department adopts the revised
scope of the AD/CVD Italy Pasta Orders to reflect the aforementioned
changes. The full text of the revised scopes is found in the Appendix
to this document.
Notification to Parties
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
These final results are being issued and published in accordance
with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: January 6, 2017.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the AD Order on Certain Pasta From Italy
Imports covered by this Order are shipments of certain non-egg
dry pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or
not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional
ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk,
gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the scope of the Order is
typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are refrigerated, frozen,
or canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the
exception of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg
white. Multicolored pasta, imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or paraffin and bound
with raffia, is excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 1.
Pursuant to the Department's August 14, 2009, changed circumstances
review, effective July 1, 2008, gluten free pasta is also excluded
from the scope of the Order. Note 2. Effective January 1, 2012,
ravioli and tortellini filled with cheese and/or vegetables are also
excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 3.
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are
certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United
States Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program for
organic products. The organic pasta certification must be retained
by exporters and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to the Order is
dispositive.
Note 1. See Memorandum to Richard Moreland, dated August 25,
1997, which is on file in the Central Records Unit.
Note 2. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Notice of Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, in
Part, 74 FR 41120 (August 14, 2009).
Note 3. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Reviews and Revocation, in Part, 79 FR 58319, 58320 (September 29,
2014).
Scope of the CVD Order on Certain Pasta From Italy
Imports covered by this Order are shipments of certain non-egg
dry pasta in packages of five pounds four ounces or less, whether or
not enriched or fortified or containing milk or other optional
ingredients such as chopped vegetables, vegetable purees, milk,
gluten, diastasis, vitamins, coloring and flavorings, and up to two
percent egg white. The pasta covered by the scope of the Order is
typically sold in the retail market, in fiberboard or cardboard
cartons, or polyethylene or polypropylene bags of varying
dimensions.
Excluded from the scope of this Order are refrigerated, frozen,
or canned pastas, as well as all forms of egg pasta, with the
exception of non-egg dry pasta containing up to two percent egg
white. Multicolored pasta, imported in kitchen display bottles of
decorative glass that are sealed with cork or paraffin and bound
with raffia, is excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 1.
Pursuant to the Department's May 12, 2011, changed circumstances
review, effective January 1, 2009, gluten free pasta is also
excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 2. Effective January 1,
2012, ravioli and tortellini filled with cheese and/or vegetables
are also excluded from the scope of the Order. Note 3.
Also excluded are imports of organic pasta from Italy that are
certified by an EU authorized body in accordance with the United
States Department of Agriculture's National Organic Program for
organic products. The organic pasta certification must be retained
by exporters and importers and made available to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection or the Department of Commerce upon request.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable
under items 1901.90.90.95 and 1902.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise subject to the Order is
dispositive.
Note 1. See Memorandum to Richard Moreland, dated August 25,
1997, which is on file in the CRU.
Note 2. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation, In
Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 12, 2011).
Note 3. See Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty and
[[Page 4294]]
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews and Revocation, in
Part, 79 FR 58319, 58320 (September 29, 2014).
[FR Doc. 2017-00654 Filed 1-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P