National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity Meeting, 2975-2977 [2017-00306]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
Justification, outweigh the potential
damage that could result if the sensitive
technology were revealed to
unauthorized persons.
4. All defense articles and services
listed in this transmittal have been
authorized for release and export to the
Government of Kuwait.
[FR Doc. 2017–00246 Filed 1–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity
Meeting
National Advisory Committee
on Institutional Quality and Integrity
(NACIQI), Office of Postsecondary
Education, U.S. Department of
Education.
ACTION: Announcement of an open
meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice sets forth the
agenda, time, and location for the
February 22–24, 2017 meeting of the
National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity
(NACIQI), and provides information to
members of the public on requesting to
make oral comments and submitting
written statements at the meeting. The
notice of this meeting is required under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA) and the Higher Education Act
(HEA) of 1965, as amended.
DATES: The NACIQI meeting will be
held on February 22, 23, and 24, 2017,
each day from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Hilton Alexandria Old
Town Hotel, 1767 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Hong, Executive Director/
Designated Federal Official, NACIQI,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Room 6W250,
Washington, DC 20202, telephone: (202)
453–7805, or email: Jennifer.Hong@
ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NACIQI’s Statutory Authority and
Function: NACIQI is established under
§ 114 of the HEA. NACIQI advises the
Secretary of Education with respect to:
• The establishment and enforcement
of the standards of accrediting agencies
or associations under subpart 2, part G,
Title IV of the HEA, as amended.
• The recognition of specific
accrediting agencies or associations.
• The preparation and publication of
the list of nationally recognized
accrediting agencies and associations.
• The eligibility and certification
process for institutions of higher
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
education under Title IV of the HEA and
part C, subchapter I, chapter 34, Title
42, together with recommendations for
improvement in such process.
• The relationship between (1)
accreditation of institutions of higher
education and the certification and
eligibility of such institutions, and (2)
State licensing responsibilities with
respect to such institutions.
• Any other advisory function
relating to accreditation and
institutional eligibility that the
Secretary of Education may prescribe by
regulation.
Meeting Agenda: Agenda items for the
February 2017 are below.
Agencies Applying for Renewal of
Recognition
1. American Podiatric Medical
Association
Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
(‘‘Provisional Accreditation’’)
throughout the United States of
freestanding colleges of podiatric
medicine and programs of podiatric
medicine, including first professional
programs leading to the degree of Doctor
of Podiatric Medicine.
2. Commission on English Language
Program Accreditation
Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation of postsecondary, nondegree-granting English language
programs and institutions in the United
States.
3. The Council on Chiropractic
Education
Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation of programs leading to the
Doctor of Chiropractic degree and
single-purpose institutions offering the
Doctor of Chiropractic program.
4. Joint Review Committee on Education
in Radiologic Technology
Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation of education programs in
radiography, magnetic resonance,
radiation therapy, and medical
dosimetry, including those offered via
distance education, at the certificate,
associate, and baccalaureate levels.
Agency Seeking Review of Compliance
Report
Western Association for Schools and
Colleges, Accrediting Commission for
Community and Junior Colleges
(ACCJC) Compliance report includes the
following: (1) Findings identified in the
April 5, 2016 letter from the senior
Department official following the
December 2015 NACIQI meeting
available at: https://opeweb.ed.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2975
aslweb/finalstaffreports.cfm, (2)
Findings identified in the January 4,
2016 Secretary’s appeal decision
available at: https://oha.ed.gov/
secretarycases/2014–10–O.pdf, (3) The
limitation on ACCJC’s authority to
approve single baccalaureate programs
within the scope of accreditation of
previously accredited institutions, as
outlined in the April 5, 2016 letter from
the senior Department official, (4)
Review under 34 CFR 602.33 of
complaints filed against the agency and
analyzed by the staff.
Requested Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
(‘‘Candidate for Accreditation’’) of
community and other colleges with a
primarily pre-baccalaureate mission
located in California, Hawaii, the United
States territories of Guam and American
Samoa, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, which offer
certificates, associate degrees, and the
first baccalaureate degree by means of a
substantive change review offered by
institutions that are already accredited
by the agency, and such programs
offered via distance education and
correspondence education at these
colleges. This recognition also extends
to the Committee on Substantive Change
of the Commission, for decisions on
substantive changes, and the Appeals
Panel.
Agency Applying for an Expansion of
Scope
Accrediting Bureau of Health Education
Schools
Current Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation of private, postsecondary
institutions in the United States offering
predominantly allied health education
programs and the programmatic
accreditation of medical assistant,
medical laboratory technician and
surgical technology programs, leading to
a certificate, diploma, Associate of
Applied Science, Associate of
Occupational Science, Academic
Associate degree, or Baccalaureate
degree, including those offered via
distance education. This scope extends
to the Substantive Change Committee,
jointly with the Commission, for
decisions on substantive changes.
Requested Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation of private, postsecondary
institutions in the United States offering
predominantly allied health education
programs and the programmatic
accreditation of medical assistant,
medical laboratory technician, and
surgical technology programs, leading to
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
2976
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
a certificate, diploma, Associate of
Applied Science, Associate of
Occupational Science, Academic
Associate degree, Baccalaureate degree,
and Master’s degree, including those
offered via distance education. The
scope extends to the Substantive Change
Committee, jointly with the
Commission, for decisions on
substantive change.
Application for Renewal of
Recognition—State Agency for the
Approval of Nurse Education
Missouri State Board of Nursing.
Election of a New Chairperson and Vice
Chairperson
NACIQI will elect a new Chairperson
and Vice Chairperson to serve three-year
terms on the Committee.
Panel on Outcome Measures
Representatives from accrediting
agencies and associations will be
invited to discuss current initiatives
regarding the consideration and review
of outcome measures in the
accreditation process.
National Coordinating Center
Accreditation Workgroup
The National Coordinating Center for
comprehensive transition and
postsecondary programs for students
with intellectual disabilities is
established under § 777 of the HEA.
Section 777(b)(5)(J) of the HEA requires
the convening of a workgroup to
develop and recommend model criteria,
standards, and components of
comprehensive transition programs for
students with intellectual disabilities,
and further requires a NACIQI member
to serve on the workgroup. Section
777(b)(6) of the HEA requires a report to
the Secretary, the authorizing
committees, and NACIQI, on the
recommendations of the workgroup not
later than five years after the date of the
establishment of the coordinating center
which was in 2010. Members of the
workgroup will provide a summary of
their report to NACIQI and a new
NACIQI representative to the workgroup
will be selected.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
NACIQI Policy Agenda
NACIQI will continue discussion
regarding its policy agenda, and revisit
how it will proceed in its review of
accrediting agencies at future meetings,
to include the Committee’s use of a
consent agenda for agencies undergoing
review.
Meeting Discussion
In addition to following the HEA, the
FACA, implementing regulations, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
the NACIQI charter, as well as its
customary procedural protocols,
NACIQI inquiries will include the
questions and topics listed in the pilot
plan it adopted at its December 2015
meeting. A document entitled ‘‘June
2016 Pilot Plan’’ and available at: https://
sites.ed.gov/naciqi/files/naciqi-dir/2016spring/pilot-project-march-2016.pdf,
outlines this pilot and provides further
explanation and context framing
NACIQI’s work. As noted in this
document, NACIQI’s reviews of
accrediting agencies will include
consideration of data and information
available on the accreditation data
dashboards, https://www2.ed.gov/
admins/finaid/accred/accreditordashboards.pdf. Accrediting agencies
that will be reviewed for renewal of
recognition will not be on the consent
agenda and are advised to come
prepared to answer questions related to
the following:
• Decision activities of and data
gathered by the agency.
Æ NACIQI will inquire about the
range of accreditation activities of the
agency since its prior review for
recognition, including discussion about
the various favorable, monitoring, and
adverse actions taken. Information about
the primary standards cited for the
monitoring and adverse actions that
have been taken will be sought.
Æ NACIQI will also inquire about
what data the agency routinely gathers
about the activities of the institutions it
accredits and about how that data is
used in their evaluative processes.
• Standards and practices with regard
to student achievement.
Æ How does your agency address
‘‘success with respect to student
achievement’’ in the institutions it
accredits?
Æ Why was this strategy chosen? How
is this appropriate in your context?
Æ What are the student achievement
challenges in the institutions accredited
by your agency?
Æ What has changed/is likely to
change in the standards about student
achievement for the institutions
accredited by your agency?
Æ In what ways have student
achievement results been used for
monitoring or adverse actions?
• Agency activities in improving
program/institutional quality.
Æ How does this agency define ‘‘at
risk?’’
Æ What tools does this agency use to
evaluate ‘‘at risk’’ status?
Æ What tools does this agency have to
help ‘‘at risk’’ institutions improve?
Æ What can the agency tell us about
how well these tools for improvement
have worked?
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
To the extent NACIQI’s questions go
to improvement of institutions and
programs that are not at risk of falling
into noncompliance with agency
requirements, the responses will be
used to inform NACIQI’s general policy
recommendations to the Department
rather than its recommendations
regarding recognition of any individual
agency.
The discussions and issues described
above regarding the pilot are in addition
to, rather than substituting for,
exploration by Committee members of
any topic relevant to recognition.
Submission of requests to make an
oral comment or to provide a written
statement regarding a specific
accrediting agency or state approval
agency under review: Oral comments
and written statements made will
become part of the official record and
will be considered by the Department
and NACIQI in their deliberations. No
individual in attendance or making oral
presentations may distribute written
materials at the meeting. Oral comments
may not exceed three minutes.
Comments and statements about an
agency’s recognition after review of a
compliance report must relate to issues
identified in the compliance report and
the criteria for recognition cited in the
senior Department official’s letter that
requested the report, or in the
Secretary’s appeal decision, if any.
Comments and statements about an
agency seeking expansion of scope must
be directed to the agency’s ability to
serve as a recognized accrediting agency
with respect to the kinds of institutions
or programs requested to be added.
Comments and statements about the
renewal of an agency’s recognition
based on a review of the agency’s
petition must relate to its compliance
with the Criteria for the Recognition of
Accrediting Agencies, or the Criteria
and Procedures for Recognition of State
Agencies for Approval of Nurse
Education, as appropriate, which are
available at https://www.ed.gov/admins/
finaid/accred/.
There are two methods the public
may use to request to make a third-party
oral comment of three minutes
concerning one of the agencies
scheduled for review at the February
22–24, 2017 meeting. To submit a
written statement to NACIQI, please
follow Method One.
Method One: Submit a request by
email to the ThirdPartyComments@
ed.gov mailbox. Please do not send
material directly to NACIQI members.
Written statements and requests to make
oral comment must be received by
February 15, 2017, and include the
subject line ‘‘Oral Comment Request:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 10, 2017 / Notices
(agency name),’’ or ‘‘Written Statement:
(agency name).’’ The email must include
the name(s), title, organization/
affiliation, mailing address, email
address, telephone number, of the
person(s) submitting a written statement
or requesting to speak, and a brief
summary (not to exceed one page) of the
principal points to be made during the
oral presentation, if applicable. All
individuals submitting an advance
request in accordance with this notice
will be afforded an opportunity to
speak.
Method Two: Register at the meeting
location on February 22, 2017, from 7:30
a.m.–8:30 a.m., to make an oral
comment during NACIQI’s deliberations
concerning a particular agency or
institution scheduled for review. The
requestor must provide his or her name,
title, organization/affiliation, mailing
address, email address, and telephone
number. A total of up to fifteen minutes
during each agency review will be
allotted for oral commenters who
register on February 22, 2017 by 8:30
a.m. Individuals will be selected on a
first-come, first-served basis. If selected,
each commenter may not exceed three
minutes.
Access to Records of the Meeting: The
Department will post the official report
of the meeting on the NACIQI Web site
within 90 days after the meeting.
Pursuant to the FACA, the public may
also inspect the materials at 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Washington,
DC, by emailing aslrecordsmanager@
ed.gov or by calling (202) 453–7110 to
schedule an appointment.
Reasonable Accommodations: The
meeting site is accessible to individuals
with disabilities. If you will need an
auxiliary aid or service to participate in
the meeting (e.g., interpreting service,
assistive listening device, or materials in
an alternate format), notify the contact
person listed in this notice at least two
weeks before the scheduled meeting
date. Although we will attempt to meet
a request received after that date, we
may not be able to make available the
requested auxiliary aid or service
because of insufficient time to arrange
it.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys . At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF, you must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:59 Jan 09, 2017
Jkt 241001
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site. You may also
access documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register by
using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1011c.
Gail McLarnon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Planning, Policy, and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2017–00306 Filed 1–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE
UNITED STATES
[Public Notice: 2017–3001]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Comment Request
Export-Import Bank of the
United States.
ACTION: Submission for OMB review and
comments request.
AGENCY:
Form Title: EIB 92–29 Export-Import
Bank Report of Premiums Payable for
Exporters Only
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of
the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal Agencies to comment on the
proposed information collection, as
required by the paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The application tool can be
reviewed at: https://exim.gov/sites/
default/files/pub/pending/eib92-29.pdf
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 9, 2017 to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted electronically on
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail
to Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20038, Attn: OMB
3048–0017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Export Import Bank of the United States,
pursuant to the Export Import Bank Act
of 1945, as amended (12 U.S.C. 635,
et.seq.), facilitates the finance of the
export of U.S. goods and services. The
‘‘Report of Premiums Payable for
Exporters Only’’ form will be used by
exporters to report and pay premiums
on insured shipments to various foreign
buyers.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2977
Title and Form Number: EIB 92–29
Export-Import Bank Report of Premiums
Payable for Exporters Only.
OMB Number: 3048–0017.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Need and Use: The ‘‘Report of
Premiums Payable for Exporters Only’’
form is used by exporters to report and
pay premiums on insured shipments to
various foreign buyers under the terms
of the policy and to certify that
premiums have been correctly
computed and remitted. The ‘Report of
Premiums Payable for Exporters Only’ is
used by EXIM to determine the
eligibility of the shipment(s) and to
calculate the premium due to EXIM
Bank for its support of the shipment(s)
under its insurance program.
Affected Public: This form affects
entities involved in the export of U.S.
goods and services.
Annual number of respondents: 2,200.
Estimated time per respondent: 15
minutes.
Annual burden hours: 6,600 hours.
Frequency of reporting or use:
Monthly.
Government Expenses:
Reviewing time per year: 6,600 hours.
Average wages per hour: $42.50.
Average cost per year: $280,500 (time
* wages).
Benefits and overhead: 20%.
Total government cost: $336,600.
Bassam Doughman,
IT Program Manager, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–00187 Filed 1–9–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690–01–P
FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
EXAMINATION
[Docket No. AS17–01]
Appraisal Subcommittee; Proposed
Revised Policy Statements
Appraisal Subcommittee of the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council.
ACTION: Proposed revised Policy
Statements.
AGENCY:
The Appraisal Subcommittee
(ASC) of the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council
requests public comment on a proposal
to revise ASC Policy Statements
(proposed Policy Statements). The
proposed Policy Statements provide
guidance to ensure State appraiser
regulatory programs comply with Title
XI of the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989,
as amended, and the rules promulgated
thereunder. The proposed Policy
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2975-2977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00306]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and
Integrity Meeting
AGENCY: National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and
Integrity (NACIQI), Office of Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department
of Education.
ACTION: Announcement of an open meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the agenda, time, and location for the
February 22-24, 2017 meeting of the National Advisory Committee on
Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI), and provides information
to members of the public on requesting to make oral comments and
submitting written statements at the meeting. The notice of this
meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and
the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended.
DATES: The NACIQI meeting will be held on February 22, 23, and 24,
2017, each day from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Hilton Alexandria Old Town Hotel, 1767 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Hong, Executive Director/
Designated Federal Official, NACIQI, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Room 6W250, Washington, DC 20202, telephone: (202)
453-7805, or email: Jennifer.Hong@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NACIQI's Statutory Authority and Function: NACIQI is established
under Sec. 114 of the HEA. NACIQI advises the Secretary of Education
with respect to:
The establishment and enforcement of the standards of
accrediting agencies or associations under subpart 2, part G, Title IV
of the HEA, as amended.
The recognition of specific accrediting agencies or
associations.
The preparation and publication of the list of nationally
recognized accrediting agencies and associations.
The eligibility and certification process for institutions
of higher education under Title IV of the HEA and part C, subchapter I,
chapter 34, Title 42, together with recommendations for improvement in
such process.
The relationship between (1) accreditation of institutions
of higher education and the certification and eligibility of such
institutions, and (2) State licensing responsibilities with respect to
such institutions.
Any other advisory function relating to accreditation and
institutional eligibility that the Secretary of Education may prescribe
by regulation.
Meeting Agenda: Agenda items for the February 2017 are below.
Agencies Applying for Renewal of Recognition
1. American Podiatric Medical Association
Scope of Recognition: The accreditation and preaccreditation
(``Provisional Accreditation'') throughout the United States of
freestanding colleges of podiatric medicine and programs of podiatric
medicine, including first professional programs leading to the degree
of Doctor of Podiatric Medicine.
2. Commission on English Language Program Accreditation
Scope of Recognition: The accreditation of postsecondary, non-
degree-granting English language programs and institutions in the
United States.
3. The Council on Chiropractic Education
Scope of Recognition: The accreditation of programs leading to the
Doctor of Chiropractic degree and single-purpose institutions offering
the Doctor of Chiropractic program.
4. Joint Review Committee on Education in Radiologic Technology
Scope of Recognition: The accreditation of education programs in
radiography, magnetic resonance, radiation therapy, and medical
dosimetry, including those offered via distance education, at the
certificate, associate, and baccalaureate levels.
Agency Seeking Review of Compliance Report
Western Association for Schools and Colleges, Accrediting
Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) Compliance report
includes the following: (1) Findings identified in the April 5, 2016
letter from the senior Department official following the December 2015
NACIQI meeting available at: https://opeweb.ed.gov/aslweb/finalstaffreports.cfm, (2) Findings identified in the January 4, 2016
Secretary's appeal decision available at: https://oha.ed.gov/secretarycases/2014-10-O.pdf, (3) The limitation on ACCJC's authority
to approve single baccalaureate programs within the scope of
accreditation of previously accredited institutions, as outlined in the
April 5, 2016 letter from the senior Department official, (4) Review
under 34 CFR 602.33 of complaints filed against the agency and analyzed
by the staff.
Requested Scope of Recognition: The accreditation and
preaccreditation (``Candidate for Accreditation'') of community and
other colleges with a primarily pre-baccalaureate mission located in
California, Hawaii, the United States territories of Guam and American
Samoa, the Republic of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, which offer certificates, associate degrees, and the
first baccalaureate degree by means of a substantive change review
offered by institutions that are already accredited by the agency, and
such programs offered via distance education and correspondence
education at these colleges. This recognition also extends to the
Committee on Substantive Change of the Commission, for decisions on
substantive changes, and the Appeals Panel.
Agency Applying for an Expansion of Scope
Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools
Current Scope of Recognition: The accreditation of private,
postsecondary institutions in the United States offering predominantly
allied health education programs and the programmatic accreditation of
medical assistant, medical laboratory technician and surgical
technology programs, leading to a certificate, diploma, Associate of
Applied Science, Associate of Occupational Science, Academic Associate
degree, or Baccalaureate degree, including those offered via distance
education. This scope extends to the Substantive Change Committee,
jointly with the Commission, for decisions on substantive changes.
Requested Scope of Recognition: The accreditation of private,
postsecondary institutions in the United States offering predominantly
allied health education programs and the programmatic accreditation of
medical assistant, medical laboratory technician, and surgical
technology programs, leading to
[[Page 2976]]
a certificate, diploma, Associate of Applied Science, Associate of
Occupational Science, Academic Associate degree, Baccalaureate degree,
and Master's degree, including those offered via distance education.
The scope extends to the Substantive Change Committee, jointly with the
Commission, for decisions on substantive change.
Application for Renewal of Recognition--State Agency for the Approval
of Nurse Education
Missouri State Board of Nursing.
Election of a New Chairperson and Vice Chairperson
NACIQI will elect a new Chairperson and Vice Chairperson to serve
three-year terms on the Committee.
Panel on Outcome Measures
Representatives from accrediting agencies and associations will be
invited to discuss current initiatives regarding the consideration and
review of outcome measures in the accreditation process.
National Coordinating Center Accreditation Workgroup
The National Coordinating Center for comprehensive transition and
postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities is
established under Sec. 777 of the HEA. Section 777(b)(5)(J) of the HEA
requires the convening of a workgroup to develop and recommend model
criteria, standards, and components of comprehensive transition
programs for students with intellectual disabilities, and further
requires a NACIQI member to serve on the workgroup. Section 777(b)(6)
of the HEA requires a report to the Secretary, the authorizing
committees, and NACIQI, on the recommendations of the workgroup not
later than five years after the date of the establishment of the
coordinating center which was in 2010. Members of the workgroup will
provide a summary of their report to NACIQI and a new NACIQI
representative to the workgroup will be selected.
NACIQI Policy Agenda
NACIQI will continue discussion regarding its policy agenda, and
revisit how it will proceed in its review of accrediting agencies at
future meetings, to include the Committee's use of a consent agenda for
agencies undergoing review.
Meeting Discussion
In addition to following the HEA, the FACA, implementing
regulations, and the NACIQI charter, as well as its customary
procedural protocols, NACIQI inquiries will include the questions and
topics listed in the pilot plan it adopted at its December 2015
meeting. A document entitled ``June 2016 Pilot Plan'' and available at:
https://sites.ed.gov/naciqi/files/naciqi-dir/2016-spring/pilot-project-march-2016.pdf, outlines this pilot and provides further explanation
and context framing NACIQI's work. As noted in this document, NACIQI's
reviews of accrediting agencies will include consideration of data and
information available on the accreditation data dashboards, https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditor-dashboards.pdf. Accrediting
agencies that will be reviewed for renewal of recognition will not be
on the consent agenda and are advised to come prepared to answer
questions related to the following:
Decision activities of and data gathered by the agency.
[cir] NACIQI will inquire about the range of accreditation
activities of the agency since its prior review for recognition,
including discussion about the various favorable, monitoring, and
adverse actions taken. Information about the primary standards cited
for the monitoring and adverse actions that have been taken will be
sought.
[cir] NACIQI will also inquire about what data the agency routinely
gathers about the activities of the institutions it accredits and about
how that data is used in their evaluative processes.
Standards and practices with regard to student
achievement.
[cir] How does your agency address ``success with respect to
student achievement'' in the institutions it accredits?
[cir] Why was this strategy chosen? How is this appropriate in your
context?
[cir] What are the student achievement challenges in the
institutions accredited by your agency?
[cir] What has changed/is likely to change in the standards about
student achievement for the institutions accredited by your agency?
[cir] In what ways have student achievement results been used for
monitoring or adverse actions?
Agency activities in improving program/institutional
quality.
[cir] How does this agency define ``at risk?''
[cir] What tools does this agency use to evaluate ``at risk''
status?
[cir] What tools does this agency have to help ``at risk''
institutions improve?
[cir] What can the agency tell us about how well these tools for
improvement have worked?
To the extent NACIQI's questions go to improvement of institutions
and programs that are not at risk of falling into noncompliance with
agency requirements, the responses will be used to inform NACIQI's
general policy recommendations to the Department rather than its
recommendations regarding recognition of any individual agency.
The discussions and issues described above regarding the pilot are
in addition to, rather than substituting for, exploration by Committee
members of any topic relevant to recognition.
Submission of requests to make an oral comment or to provide a
written statement regarding a specific accrediting agency or state
approval agency under review: Oral comments and written statements made
will become part of the official record and will be considered by the
Department and NACIQI in their deliberations. No individual in
attendance or making oral presentations may distribute written
materials at the meeting. Oral comments may not exceed three minutes.
Comments and statements about an agency's recognition after review
of a compliance report must relate to issues identified in the
compliance report and the criteria for recognition cited in the senior
Department official's letter that requested the report, or in the
Secretary's appeal decision, if any. Comments and statements about an
agency seeking expansion of scope must be directed to the agency's
ability to serve as a recognized accrediting agency with respect to the
kinds of institutions or programs requested to be added. Comments and
statements about the renewal of an agency's recognition based on a
review of the agency's petition must relate to its compliance with the
Criteria for the Recognition of Accrediting Agencies, or the Criteria
and Procedures for Recognition of State Agencies for Approval of Nurse
Education, as appropriate, which are available at https://www.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/.
There are two methods the public may use to request to make a
third-party oral comment of three minutes concerning one of the
agencies scheduled for review at the February 22-24, 2017 meeting. To
submit a written statement to NACIQI, please follow Method One.
Method One: Submit a request by email to the
ThirdPartyComments@ed.gov mailbox. Please do not send material directly
to NACIQI members. Written statements and requests to make oral comment
must be received by February 15, 2017, and include the subject line
``Oral Comment Request:
[[Page 2977]]
(agency name),'' or ``Written Statement: (agency name).'' The email
must include the name(s), title, organization/affiliation, mailing
address, email address, telephone number, of the person(s) submitting a
written statement or requesting to speak, and a brief summary (not to
exceed one page) of the principal points to be made during the oral
presentation, if applicable. All individuals submitting an advance
request in accordance with this notice will be afforded an opportunity
to speak.
Method Two: Register at the meeting location on February 22, 2017,
from 7:30 a.m.-8:30 a.m., to make an oral comment during NACIQI's
deliberations concerning a particular agency or institution scheduled
for review. The requestor must provide his or her name, title,
organization/affiliation, mailing address, email address, and telephone
number. A total of up to fifteen minutes during each agency review will
be allotted for oral commenters who register on February 22, 2017 by
8:30 a.m. Individuals will be selected on a first-come, first-served
basis. If selected, each commenter may not exceed three minutes.
Access to Records of the Meeting: The Department will post the
official report of the meeting on the NACIQI Web site within 90 days
after the meeting. Pursuant to the FACA, the public may also inspect
the materials at 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC, by emailing
aslrecordsmanager@ed.gov or by calling (202) 453-7110 to schedule an
appointment.
Reasonable Accommodations: The meeting site is accessible to
individuals with disabilities. If you will need an auxiliary aid or
service to participate in the meeting (e.g., interpreting service,
assistive listening device, or materials in an alternate format),
notify the contact person listed in this notice at least two weeks
before the scheduled meeting date. Although we will attempt to meet a
request received after that date, we may not be able to make available
the requested auxiliary aid or service because of insufficient time to
arrange it.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys . At this site you can view this document, as
well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF,
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1011c.
Gail McLarnon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning, Policy, and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2017-00306 Filed 1-9-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P