Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia and the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 1692-1693 [2017-00029]

Download as PDF sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 1692 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation of the Export Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, or any order, license or authorization issued thereunder; any regulation, license, or order issued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial of export privileges under this provision may be for a period of up to 10 years from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that the Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office of Exporter Services may revoke any Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of his conviction. BIS has received notice of Malik’s conviction for violating the AECA, and has provided notice and an opportunity for Malik to make a written submission to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS has not received a submission from Malik. Based upon my review and consultations with BIS’s Office of Export Enforcement, including its Director, and the facts available to BIS, I have decided to deny Malik’s export privileges under the Regulations for a period of five years from the date of Malik’s conviction. I have also decided to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to the Act or Regulations in which Malik had an interest at the time of his conviction. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: First, from the date of this Order until June 29, 2020, Kamran Ashfaq Malik, with a last known address of Inmate Number: 57841–037, FCI Fort Dix, Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 2000, Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640, and when acting for or on his behalf, his successors, assigns, employees, agents or representatives (the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Jan 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Malik by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the provisions of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order. Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Malik may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of the Regulations. Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to the Malik. This Order shall be published in the Federal Register. Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until June 29, 2020. Issued this 29th day of December, 2016. Karen H. Nies-Vogel, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. 2017–00016 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–560–823, C–560–824, A–570–958, C–570– 959] Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on certain coated paper suitable for high-quality print graphics using sheet-fed presses (coated paper) from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD and CVD orders. DATES: Effective January 6, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova at (202) 482– 1280 (AD orders), Jackie Arrowsmith at (202) 482–5255 (Indonesia CVD order), or Mark Kennedy at (202) 482–7883 (PRC CVD order), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 1, 2015, the Department initiated 1 and the ITC instituted 2 fiveyear (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the AD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping,3 and that revocation of the CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable subsidies.4 The Department, therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail were the AD and CVD orders revoked.5 On December 29, 2016, the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, that revocation of the AD and CVD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.6 Scope of the Orders The scope of the orders cover certain coated paper and paperboard 7 in sheets sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 80 FR 59133 (October 1, 2015). 2 See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, 80 FR 59189 (October 1, 2015). 3 See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 907 (January 8, 2016) (Dumping Final). 4 See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 6234 (February 5, 2016); and Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 7081 (February 10, 2016). 5 Id. and Dumping Final. 6 See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia; Determination, 81 FR 96044 (December 29, 2016). See also Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, Inv. Nos. 701–TA–470–471 and 731–TA–1169–1170 (Review), USITC Publication 4656, December 2016. 7 ‘‘ ‘Paperboard’ refers to Certain Coated Paper that is heavier, thicker and more rigid than coated paper which otherwise meets the product description. In the context of Certain Coated Paper, paperboard typically is referred to as ‘cover,’ to distinguish it from ‘text.’ ’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:06 Jan 05, 2017 Jkt 241001 suitable for high quality print graphics using sheet-fed presses; coated on one or both sides with kaolin (China or other clay), calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, and/or other inorganic substances; with or without a binder; having a GE brightness level of 80 or higher,8 weighing not more than 340 grams per square meter; whether gloss grade, satin grade, matte grade, dull grade, or any other grade of finish; whether or not surface-colored, surfacedecorated, printed (except as described below), embossed, or perforated; and irrespective of dimensions (Certain Coated Paper). Certain Coated Paper includes (a) coated free sheet paper and paperboard that meets this scope definition; (b) coated groundwood paper and paperboard produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other coated paper and paperboard that meets this scope definition. Certain Coated Paper is typically (but not exclusively) used for printing multicolored graphics for catalogues, books, magazines, envelopes, labels and wraps, greeting cards, and other commercial printing applications requiring high quality print graphics. Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of paper and paperboard printed with final content printed text or graphics. Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 4810.14.11, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010, 4810.14.2090, 4810.14.5000, 4810.14.6000, 4810.14.70, 4810.19.1100, 4810.19.1900, 4810.19.2010, 4810.19.2090, 4810.22.1000, 4810.22.50, 4810.22.6000, 4810.22.70, 4810.29.1000, 4810.29.5000, 4810.29.6000, 4810.29.70, 4810.32, 4810.39 and 4810.92. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of these orders is dispositive. Continuation of the Orders As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC that revocation of the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a continuation or a recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and material 8 One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light off of a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1693 injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the Department hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions. These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and published pursuant to section 777(i) the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Dated: December 29, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2017–00029 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–807] Sulfanilic Acid From India: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on sulfanilic acid from India would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the levels indicated in the Final Results of Review section of this notice. DATES: Effective January 6, 2017. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1692-1693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-560-823, C-560-824, A-570-958, C-570-959]


Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 
Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) 
that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty 
(CVD) orders on certain coated paper suitable for high-quality print 
graphics using sheet-fed presses (coated paper) from Indonesia and the 
People's Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and 
material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is 
publishing a notice of continuation of the AD and CVD orders.

DATES: Effective January 6, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova at (202) 482-
1280 (AD orders), Jackie Arrowsmith at (202) 482-5255 (Indonesia CVD 
order), or Mark Kennedy at (202) 482-7883 (PRC CVD order), AD/CVD 
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401

[[Page 1693]]

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 1, 2015, the Department initiated \1\ and the ITC 
instituted \2\ five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD orders on 
coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC, pursuant to section 751(c) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its 
reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the AD orders on 
coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping,\3\ and that revocation of the 
CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of 
countervailable subsidies.\4\ The Department, therefore, notified the 
ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and net countervailable 
subsidy rates likely to prevail were the AD and CVD orders revoked.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 80 FR 
59133 (October 1, 2015).
    \2\ See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, 80 FR 59189 
(October 1, 2015).
    \3\ See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print 
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia and the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews 
of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 907 (January 8, 2016) (Dumping 
Final).
    \4\ See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print 
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final Results of 
Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 
FR 6234 (February 5, 2016); and Certain Coated Paper Suitable for 
High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset 
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 7081 (February 10, 
2016).
    \5\ Id. and Dumping Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 29, 2016, the ITC published its determinations, 
pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, that revocation of the 
AD and CVD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would 
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an 
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics 
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia; Determination, 81 
FR 96044 (December 29, 2016). See also Coated Paper Suitable for 
High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and 
Indonesia, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-470-471 and 731-TA-1169-1170 (Review), 
USITC Publication 4656, December 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Orders

    The scope of the orders cover certain coated paper and paperboard 
\7\ in sheets suitable for high quality print graphics using sheet-fed 
presses; coated on one or both sides with kaolin (China or other clay), 
calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, and/or other inorganic substances; 
with or without a binder; having a GE brightness level of 80 or 
higher,\8\ weighing not more than 340 grams per square meter; whether 
gloss grade, satin grade, matte grade, dull grade, or any other grade 
of finish; whether or not surface-colored, surface-decorated, printed 
(except as described below), embossed, or perforated; and irrespective 
of dimensions (Certain Coated Paper).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ `` `Paperboard' refers to Certain Coated Paper that is 
heavier, thicker and more rigid than coated paper which otherwise 
meets the product description. In the context of Certain Coated 
Paper, paperboard typically is referred to as `cover,' to 
distinguish it from `text.' ''
    \8\ One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is 
brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better 
the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured 
using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light 
off of a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would 
be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured 
grade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Certain Coated Paper includes (a) coated free sheet paper and 
paperboard that meets this scope definition; (b) coated groundwood 
paper and paperboard produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical 
pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other coated 
paper and paperboard that meets this scope definition.
    Certain Coated Paper is typically (but not exclusively) used for 
printing multi-colored graphics for catalogues, books, magazines, 
envelopes, labels and wraps, greeting cards, and other commercial 
printing applications requiring high quality print graphics.
    Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of paper and 
paperboard printed with final content printed text or graphics.
    Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the 
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS): 4810.14.11, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010, 4810.14.2090, 
4810.14.5000, 4810.14.6000, 4810.14.70, 4810.19.1100, 4810.19.1900, 
4810.19.2010, 4810.19.2090, 4810.22.1000, 4810.22.50, 4810.22.6000, 
4810.22.70, 4810.29.1000, 4810.29.5000, 4810.29.6000, 4810.29.70, 
4810.32, 4810.39 and 4810.92. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope 
of these orders is dispositive.

Continuation of the Orders

    As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC 
that revocation of the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a 
continuation or a recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies 
and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to 
section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the Department 
hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on coated paper 
from Indonesia and the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 
will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in 
effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise.
    The effective date of the continuation of the orders will be the 
date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of 
continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department 
intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later 
than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of 
continuation.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective 
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which 
may be subject to sanctions.
    These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with 
sections 751(c) and published pursuant to section 777(i) the Act and 19 
CFR 351.218(f)(4).

    Dated: December 29, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-00029 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P