Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia and the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 1692-1693 [2017-00029]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1692
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). The denial
of export privileges under this provision
may be for a period of up to 10 years
from the date of the conviction. 15 CFR
766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 4610(h). In
addition, Section 750.8 of the
Regulations states that the Bureau of
Industry and Security’s Office of
Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Malik’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
has provided notice and an opportunity
for Malik to make a written submission
to BIS, as provided in Section 766.25 of
the Regulations. BIS has not received a
submission from Malik.
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Malik’s export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period of five years from the date of
Malik’s conviction. I have also decided
to revoke all licenses issued pursuant to
the Act or Regulations in which Malik
had an interest at the time of his
conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
June 29, 2020, Kamran Ashfaq Malik,
with a last known address of Inmate
Number: 57841–037, FCI Fort Dix,
Federal Correctional Institution, P.O.
Box 2000, Joint Base MDL, NJ 08640,
and when acting for or on his behalf, his
successors, assigns, employees, agents
or representatives (the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Jan 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Malik by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Malik may file an
appeal of this Order with the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security. The appeal must be filed
within 45 days from the date of this
Order and must comply with the
provisions of Part 756 of the
Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Malik. This Order shall
be published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until June 29, 2020.
Issued this 29th day of December, 2016.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2017–00016 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–560–823, C–560–824, A–570–958, C–570–
959]
Certain Coated Paper Suitable for
High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia
and the People’s Republic of China:
Continuation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD)
orders on certain coated paper suitable
for high-quality print graphics using
sheet-fed presses (coated paper) from
Indonesia and the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and countervailable subsidies and
material injury to an industry in the
United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation of
the AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Effective January 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terre Keaton Stefanova at (202) 482–
1280 (AD orders), Jackie Arrowsmith at
(202) 482–5255 (Indonesia CVD order),
or Mark Kennedy at (202) 482–7883
(PRC CVD order), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 2017 / Notices
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 1, 2015, the Department
initiated 1 and the ITC instituted 2 fiveyear (sunset) reviews of the AD and
CVD orders on coated paper from
Indonesia and the PRC, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act). As a result of its
reviews, the Department determined
that revocation of the AD orders on
coated paper from Indonesia and the
PRC would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping,3 and that
revocation of the CVD orders would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of countervailable subsidies.4 The
Department, therefore, notified the ITC
of the magnitude of the margins of
dumping and net countervailable
subsidy rates likely to prevail were the
AD and CVD orders revoked.5
On December 29, 2016, the ITC
published its determinations, pursuant
to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act,
that revocation of the AD and CVD
orders on coated paper from Indonesia
and the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.6
Scope of the Orders
The scope of the orders cover certain
coated paper and paperboard 7 in sheets
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
80 FR 59133 (October 1, 2015).
2 See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality
Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China
and Indonesia, 80 FR 59189 (October 1, 2015).
3 See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses
from Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of
the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 907 (January
8, 2016) (Dumping Final).
4 See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for HighQuality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses
from Indonesia: Final Results of Expedited First
Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81
FR 6234 (February 5, 2016); and Certain Coated
Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR
7081 (February 10, 2016).
5 Id. and Dumping Final.
6 See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality
Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China
and Indonesia; Determination, 81 FR 96044
(December 29, 2016). See also Coated Paper
Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics Using
Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, Inv.
Nos. 701–TA–470–471 and 731–TA–1169–1170
(Review), USITC Publication 4656, December 2016.
7 ‘‘ ‘Paperboard’ refers to Certain Coated Paper
that is heavier, thicker and more rigid than coated
paper which otherwise meets the product
description. In the context of Certain Coated Paper,
paperboard typically is referred to as ‘cover,’ to
distinguish it from ‘text.’ ’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Jan 05, 2017
Jkt 241001
suitable for high quality print graphics
using sheet-fed presses; coated on one
or both sides with kaolin (China or other
clay), calcium carbonate, titanium
dioxide, and/or other inorganic
substances; with or without a binder;
having a GE brightness level of 80 or
higher,8 weighing not more than 340
grams per square meter; whether gloss
grade, satin grade, matte grade, dull
grade, or any other grade of finish;
whether or not surface-colored, surfacedecorated, printed (except as described
below), embossed, or perforated; and
irrespective of dimensions (Certain
Coated Paper).
Certain Coated Paper includes (a)
coated free sheet paper and paperboard
that meets this scope definition; (b)
coated groundwood paper and
paperboard produced from bleached
chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp
(BCTMP) that meets this scope
definition; and (c) any other coated
paper and paperboard that meets this
scope definition.
Certain Coated Paper is typically (but
not exclusively) used for printing multicolored graphics for catalogues, books,
magazines, envelopes, labels and wraps,
greeting cards, and other commercial
printing applications requiring high
quality print graphics.
Specifically excluded from the scope
are imports of paper and paperboard
printed with final content printed text
or graphics.
Imports of the subject merchandise
are provided for under the following
categories of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS):
4810.14.11, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010,
4810.14.2090, 4810.14.5000,
4810.14.6000, 4810.14.70, 4810.19.1100,
4810.19.1900, 4810.19.2010,
4810.19.2090, 4810.22.1000, 4810.22.50,
4810.22.6000, 4810.22.70, 4810.29.1000,
4810.29.5000, 4810.29.6000, 4810.29.70,
4810.32, 4810.39 and 4810.92. While
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of these
orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the AD and CVD orders
would likely lead to a continuation or
a recurrence of dumping and
countervailable subsidies and material
8 One of the key measurements of any grade of
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
light off of a grade of paper. One is the lowest
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1693
injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the
Department hereby orders the
continuation of the AD and CVD orders
on coated paper from Indonesia and the
PRC. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) will continue to collect
AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates
in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of the orders will be the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of these orders not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Failure to comply is a violation of the
APO which may be subject to sanctions.
These five-year (sunset) reviews and
notice are in accordance with sections
751(c) and published pursuant to
section 777(i) the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: December 29, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017–00029 Filed 1–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–807]
Sulfanilic Acid From India: Final
Results of Expedited Sunset Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the countervailing duty (CVD) order
on sulfanilic acid from India would
likely lead to the continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
at the levels indicated in the Final
Results of Review section of this notice.
DATES: Effective January 6, 2017.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1692-1693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-560-823, C-560-824, A-570-958, C-570-959]
Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses From Indonesia and the People's Republic of
China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty
(CVD) orders on certain coated paper suitable for high-quality print
graphics using sheet-fed presses (coated paper) from Indonesia and the
People's Republic of China (PRC) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and
material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation of the AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Effective January 6, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terre Keaton Stefanova at (202) 482-
1280 (AD orders), Jackie Arrowsmith at (202) 482-5255 (Indonesia CVD
order), or Mark Kennedy at (202) 482-7883 (PRC CVD order), AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
[[Page 1693]]
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 1, 2015, the Department initiated \1\ and the ITC
instituted \2\ five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD orders on
coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC, pursuant to section 751(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its
reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the AD orders on
coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping,\3\ and that revocation of the
CVD orders would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies.\4\ The Department, therefore, notified the
ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping and net countervailable
subsidy rates likely to prevail were the AD and CVD orders revoked.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 80 FR
59133 (October 1, 2015).
\2\ See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia, 80 FR 59189
(October 1, 2015).
\3\ See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia and the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews
of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 907 (January 8, 2016) (Dumping
Final).
\4\ See Certain Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print
Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from Indonesia: Final Results of
Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81
FR 6234 (February 5, 2016); and Certain Coated Paper Suitable for
High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 7081 (February 10,
2016).
\5\ Id. and Dumping Final.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 29, 2016, the ITC published its determinations,
pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Act, that revocation of the
AD and CVD orders on coated paper from Indonesia and the PRC would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Coated Paper Suitable for High-Quality Print Graphics
Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and Indonesia; Determination, 81
FR 96044 (December 29, 2016). See also Coated Paper Suitable for
High-Quality Print Graphics Using Sheet-Fed Presses from China and
Indonesia, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-470-471 and 731-TA-1169-1170 (Review),
USITC Publication 4656, December 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The scope of the orders cover certain coated paper and paperboard
\7\ in sheets suitable for high quality print graphics using sheet-fed
presses; coated on one or both sides with kaolin (China or other clay),
calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, and/or other inorganic substances;
with or without a binder; having a GE brightness level of 80 or
higher,\8\ weighing not more than 340 grams per square meter; whether
gloss grade, satin grade, matte grade, dull grade, or any other grade
of finish; whether or not surface-colored, surface-decorated, printed
(except as described below), embossed, or perforated; and irrespective
of dimensions (Certain Coated Paper).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ `` `Paperboard' refers to Certain Coated Paper that is
heavier, thicker and more rigid than coated paper which otherwise
meets the product description. In the context of Certain Coated
Paper, paperboard typically is referred to as `cover,' to
distinguish it from `text.' ''
\8\ One of the key measurements of any grade of paper is
brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter the paper the better
the contrast between the paper and the ink. Brightness is measured
using a GE Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of light
off of a grade of paper. One is the lowest reflection, or what would
be given to a totally black grade, and 100 is the brightest measured
grade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain Coated Paper includes (a) coated free sheet paper and
paperboard that meets this scope definition; (b) coated groundwood
paper and paperboard produced from bleached chemi-thermo-mechanical
pulp (BCTMP) that meets this scope definition; and (c) any other coated
paper and paperboard that meets this scope definition.
Certain Coated Paper is typically (but not exclusively) used for
printing multi-colored graphics for catalogues, books, magazines,
envelopes, labels and wraps, greeting cards, and other commercial
printing applications requiring high quality print graphics.
Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of paper and
paperboard printed with final content printed text or graphics.
Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS): 4810.14.11, 4810.14.1900, 4810.14.2010, 4810.14.2090,
4810.14.5000, 4810.14.6000, 4810.14.70, 4810.19.1100, 4810.19.1900,
4810.19.2010, 4810.19.2090, 4810.22.1000, 4810.22.50, 4810.22.6000,
4810.22.70, 4810.29.1000, 4810.29.5000, 4810.29.6000, 4810.29.70,
4810.32, 4810.39 and 4810.92. While HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of these orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a
continuation or a recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies
and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to
section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), the Department
hereby orders the continuation of the AD and CVD orders on coated paper
from Indonesia and the PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
will continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in
effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of the orders will be the
date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year review of these orders not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which
may be subject to sanctions.
These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and published pursuant to section 777(i) the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: December 29, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2017-00029 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
