Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System, 1183-1185 [2016-31667]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
BLLYJ, CA
STAXS, CA
GILYY, CA
KUMBA, CA
Imperial, CA
(IPL)
WP
WP
WP
WP
VORTAC
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
21, 2016.
Leslie M. Swann,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
116°45′56.45″
116°32′17.69″
116°21′05.24″
116°03′13.37″
115°30′30.90″
Issued: December 22, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
18 CFR Parts 375 and 388
[FR Doc. 2016–31541 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am]
[Docket Nos. RM16–15–000, RM15–25–001]
Regulations Implementing FAST Act
Section 61003—Critical Electric
Infrastructure Security and Amending
Critical Energy Infrastructure
Information; Availability of Certain
North American Electric Reliability
Corporation Databases to the
Commission; Correction
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 360
RIN 0625–AB09
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document contains
corrections to the final rule (RM16–15–
000, RM15–25–001) which published in
the Federal Register on Wednesday,
December 21, 2016 (81 FR 93732). The
final rule amended the Commission’s
regulations to implement provisions of
the Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act that pertain to the
designation, protection and sharing of
Critical Electric Infrastructure
Information.
SUMMARY:
Effective January 5, 2017, and is
applicable beginning December 21,
2016.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nneka Frye, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
6029, Nneka.frye@ferc.gov
Christopher MacFarlane, Office of the
General Counsel, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–6761,
Christopher.macfarlane@ferc.gov
Mark Hershfield, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
8597, Mark.hershfield@ferc.gov
Jkt 241001
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis
System
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
On
November 17, 2016, the Commission
issued a final rule in the abovecaptioned proceeding. This document
corrects Footnote 6 in FR Doc 2016–
28322, published in the Federal
Register of December 21, 2016 (81 FR
93732), by adding the following citation
on page 93733, in the first column:
FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 32,715.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
18:22 Jan 04, 2017
32°49′38.06″
32°52′16.70″
32°52′12.12″
32°45′43.18″
32°44′55.92″
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2016–31901 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is extending the Steel
Import Monitoring and Analysis (SIMA)
system until March 21, 2022. The
purpose of the SIMA system is to
provide to the public statistical data on
steel imports entering the United States
roughly five weeks earlier than it would
otherwise be available. Aggregate data
collected from the steel import licenses
are made available to the public on a
weekly basis following review by the
Department.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective March 21, 2017.
For
information about the SIMA system,
please contact Julie Al-Saadawi (202)
482–1930 or Michael Rollin (202) 482–
4978.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The SIMA system has operated under
its current authority since March 21,
2005. Prior to that date, authority for
steel import licensing and monitoring
was derived from Proclamation 7529 of
March 5, 2002 (67 FR 10553). Pursuant
to sections 201 and 203 of the 1974
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1183
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
Trade Act, 19 U.S.C. 2251, 2253,
Proclamation 7529 implemented
safeguard measures with respect to
certain imported steel products, placing
temporary tariffs on these steel imports
and providing the steel industry time to
restructure. The monitoring system
outlined in Proclamation 7529 required
all importers of steel products to obtain
a license from the Department prior to
completing their customs entry
summary documentation. This provided
a monitoring tool to ensure that the
effectiveness of the steel safeguard
measures was not undermined by large
quantities of imports originating from
countries that were excluded from the
tariffs.
In Proclamation 7741 of December 4,
2003 (68 FR 68483), the President
terminated the steel safeguard measures,
but directed the Secretary of Commerce
to continue the monitoring system until
the earlier of March 21, 2005, or such
time as the Secretary of Commerce
established a replacement program. On
December 9, 2003, the Department
published a notice stating that the
system would continue in effect as
described in Proclamation 7741 until
March 21, 2005 (68 FR 68594). On
August 25, 2004, the Department
published an advance notice of
proposed rulemaking soliciting
comments from the public on whether
to continue the monitoring system
beyond March 21, 2005 (69 FR 52211).
The Department changed the program’s
name from the Steel Import Licensing
and Surge Monitoring program to the
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis
(SIMA) system. The name change was
notified in the publication of the August
2004 advance notice (69 FR 52211). On
March 11, 2005, the Department
published an interim final rule
responding to the comments received
from the public and implementing a
slightly expanded version of SIMA until
March 21, 2009. That interim final rule
was followed by the publication of the
final rule on December 5, 2005 (70 FR
72373).
On December 12, 2008, a proposed
rule was published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 75624) seeking an
extension of the SIMA system through
March 21, 2013 and asking for
comments from the public. The
Department received twelve
submissions, all of which expressed
support for the extension. On March 18,
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
1184
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
2009, the Department issued the final
rule (74 FR 11474) to extend the
application of the SIMA system until
March 21, 2013. On November 13, 2012
(77 FR 67593), the Department
published a proposed rule seeking
comments on an extension of the SIMA
system through March 21, 2017. The
Department received three submissions,
all of which expressed support for the
extension. The Department issued the
final rule to extend the application of
the SIMA system until March 21, 2017
(78 FR 11090). On October 13, 2016, the
Department published a proposed rule
seeking comments on an extension of
the SIMA system through March 21,
2022 (81 FR 70650). The Department
received two submissions, both of
which expressed support for the
extension. The Department is issuing
this final rule to extend the application
of the SIMA system until March 21,
2022. The sole change included in this
final rule was extending the program’s
lifespan to five years (the program’s
previous lifespan was four years—at
which time an extension of the program
must be proposed).
The purpose of the SIMA system is to
provide steel producers, steel
consumers, importers, and the general
public with accurate and timely
information on anticipated imports of
certain steel products. Import licenses,
obtained through the Internet-based
SIMA licensing system, are required for
U.S. imports of basic steel mill
products. Aggregate import data
obtained from the licenses are updated
weekly and posted on the SIMA Web
site monitor. Details of the current
system can be found at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/steel/license/.
Response to Comments
Submissions received during the
public comment period established in
the proposed rule have been considered
in preparing this final rule. Two
submissions were received, one from a
coalition of nine steel trade groups
(referred to as the ‘‘industry’’), and one
from a large steel-producing company in
the United States, AK Steel Corporation.
Both of the submissions supported the
five-year extension and agreed that the
system is a critical tool that helps the
industry closely monitor steel imports.
The comments are summarized below.
The two submissions received are
posted on the Federal rulemaking portal
at www.Regulations.gov as well as on
the SIMA Web site at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/steel/license/.
Comment 1: Commenters strongly
support the extension of the SIMA
system for an additional five years. They
state that given the current global
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
overcapacity in steel that is fueling
surges in steel imports, the SIMA
system gives the public access to the
timeliest information possible regarding
import patterns and changes,
particularly increases in volumes. They
also view the system as an important
and transparent tool to support rational
decision-making by all interested
parties—steel producers, steel
consumers, importers and U.S.
government officials.
Response: The Department agrees that
the SIMA system provides the public
valuable and timely information on steel
mill imports. The Department also
agrees that making aggregate import
volume and pricing data drawn from the
licenses publicly available provides all
interested stakeholders with a more
informed understanding of changing
market conditions in a transparent
manner.
Comment 2: Commenters state that
there is no significant burden on the
steel importing community to comply
with the licensing requirements of the
SIMA system, and that this has been
confirmed over the last 12 years in its
current format, which remains
unchanged by the proposed rule.
Response: The Department agrees that
there is no significant burden on steel
importers arising out of SIMA system
licensing requirements. The web-based
licensing system is automatic and free of
charge. The Department estimates that it
continues to take no longer than ten
minutes to complete the automated
license form, and for most applicants,
the time spent is much less.
Comment 3: Commenters suggest that
the Department make the SIMA system
permanent rather than extend it for
another five years. They state that the
system has proven its effectiveness as an
important analytical tool for both steel
producers and consumers.
Response: Broad authority to collect
information on imports is granted to the
Secretary of Commerce and delegated to
the Director of the Bureau of the Census.
When the original safeguard authority
for the SIMA system granted by the
President expired in March 2005, the
system was continued pursuant to this
Department of Commerce information
collection authority (13 U.S.C. 301(a)
and 302). For purposes of administering
the SIMA system, this authority was
temporarily transferred from the
Director of the Census Bureau to the
Under Secretary for International Trade
for four years. One of the conditions of
the temporary transfer of authority to
the Under Secretary for International
Trade was that any future periodic
extension of the SIMA system be
notified to the Secretary and subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
review. Therefore, establishment of a
permanent system is not possible under
current authority.
For the reasons discussed above, the
proposed rule (19 CFR part 360) is made
final without changes.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies
with federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration at the
proposed rule stage, that this rule, if
adopted, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as that term is
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The factual
basis for the certification is found in the
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
No comments were received on the
certification or the economic impacts of
this action. As a result, no final
regulatory flexibility analysis is required
and none was prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements subject to
review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
These requirements have been approved
by OMB (OMB No. 0625–0245;
Expiration Date: 1/31/2018). Public
reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to be less than
ten minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. All responses to this
collection of information are voluntary,
and will be provided confidentially to
the extent allowed by law.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 360
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Steel.
Dated: December 23, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement &
Compliance.
For reasons discussed in the
preamble, 19 CFR part 360 is amended
as follows:
PART 360—STEEL IMPORT
MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
1. The authority citation for part 360
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.
2. Section 360.105 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 360.105 Duration of the steel import
licensing requirement.
The licensing program will be in
effect through March 21, 2022, but may
be extended upon review and
notification in the Federal Register
prior to this expiration date. Licenses
will be required on all subject imports
entered during this period, even if the
entry summary documents are not filed
until after the expiration of this
program. The licenses will be valid for
10 business days after the expiration of
this program to allow for the final filing
of required Customs documentation.
[FR Doc. 2016–31667 Filed 1–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PEACE CORPS
22 CFR Part 305
RIN 0420–AA26
Eligibility and Standards for Peace
Corps Volunteer Service
Peace Corps.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Peace Corps issues this
final rule to restate and update the
requirements for eligibility for Peace
Corps Volunteer service, and the factors
considered in the assessment and
selection of eligible applicants for
training and service. The requirements
and factors for eligibility and selection
were last published in 1984. A revision
of the regulation is necessary to conform
to changes in Federal laws and
regulations, particularly with respect to
those prohibiting discrimination on the
basis of disability, and to reflect policy
changes made by the Peace Corps.
DATES: The final rule is effective on
January 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony F. Marra, Associate General
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 04, 2017
Jkt 241001
Counsel, Peace Corps, 1111 20th Street
NW., Washington, DC 20526.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Under the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C.
2501 et seq.), the Peace Corps is
authorized to enroll qualified U.S.
citizens and nationals as Volunteers to
serve abroad, under conditions of
hardship if necessary, (i) to help the
people of interested countries meet their
need for trained manpower, particularly
in meeting the basic needs of those
living in the poorest areas of such
countries, (ii) to help promote a better
understanding of the American people
on the part of the people served, and
(iii) to help promote a better
understanding of other peoples on the
part of the American people. The Peace
Corps is authorized to establish the
terms and conditions of enrollment of
Volunteers, as well as the terms and
conditions of service. The Peace Corps
published a proposed rule on July 31,
2015 (80 FR 45620) to revise and update
the 30 year-old regulation concerning
eligibility and selection standards for
Peace Corps Volunteer service. The
comment period for the proposed rule
ended on August 31, 2015, and the
Peace Corps received three comments.
II. Summary of Rulemaking
The revised rule will make the
following changes:
(1) Introduction. The introductory
section (22 CFR 305.1) provides new
definitions for the three stages
(Applicant, Trainee, and Volunteer) that
an individual who is interested in
service as a Volunteer passes through. It
also provides a definition of the term
‘‘enrollment’’, which is used in
connection with an individual’s service
as a Volunteer. The section includes a
general statement explaining the process
the Peace Corps follows in the selection
of Volunteers and provides notice to
applicants regarding the importance of
submitting complete and accurate
information in the application process.
The section eliminates the recitation of
the various anti-discrimination statutes
that the Peace Corps is obligated to
follow and replaces it with a clear
statement that the Peace Corps does not
discriminate on various grounds in the
selection of Volunteers. Note that with
regard to prohibiting discrimination on
the basis of disability in the programs
and activities of the Peace Corps, the
agency is in the process of developing
its section 504 implementing regulation
and plans to coordinate the regulation’s
development with the Department of
Justice pursuant to the requirements of
Executive Order 12250. The section
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1185
advises that applicants may be
disqualified, and Volunteers and
Trainees may be separated, if the Peace
Corps determines they provided
materially false, misleading, inaccurate,
or incomplete information during the
Peace Corps application process.
(2) Eligibility. The eligibility section
(22 CFR 305.2) is simplified to address
only the existing citizenship and age
criteria for Volunteer applicants. Other
eligibility factors in the current § 305.2
are moved to succeeding sections,
where they are updated and expanded.
(3) Selection Standards. A revised
§ 305.3 incorporates the selection factors
that previously appeared in § 305.4. The
revision restates the attributes that an
applicant must meet for Volunteer
service. It revises the description of the
various personal attributes that are
taken into account when evaluating
applicants. The revised § 305.3 explains
that the Peace Corps assesses each
applicant’s personal, professional,
educational, and legal qualifications in
order to select those applicants most
likely to be successful in a Peace Corps
assignment, serving under conditions of
hardship if necessary, to achieve the
goals of the Peace Corps. Meeting the
several qualifications does not in and of
itself entitle any individual to serve in
the Peace Corps, because the revision
states that the Peace Corps endeavors to
select the best qualified individuals
from among all eligible applicants.
(4) Medical Status. The revised part
305 creates a new § 305.4 that replaces
the provision on the medical
qualifications of applicants that
previously appeared in § 305.2. The
revised section implements, in relation
to applications for Volunteer service,
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. It
states that an applicant must have the
physical and mental capacity required
to meet the essential eligibility
requirements for a Volunteer and sets
out those essential eligibility
requirements, which include the
capability to:
A revised § 305.4(a)(1)(i)–(iii)
addresses medical stat.
It also requires that, in order for an
applicant to be medically qualified for
Volunteer service, the Peace Corps must
have the capability to provide necessary
or appropriate health care for the
applicant. It includes a requirement that
the Peace Corps consider reasonable
accommodations in determining
whether an applicant has the physical
and mental capacity required to meet
the essential eligibility requirements for
a Volunteer and whether the Peace
Corps has the capability to provide
necessary or appropriate health care for
the applicant.
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1183-1185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31667]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 360
RIN 0625-AB09
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the
Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis (SIMA) system until March 21,
2022. The purpose of the SIMA system is to provide to the public
statistical data on steel imports entering the United States roughly
five weeks earlier than it would otherwise be available. Aggregate data
collected from the steel import licenses are made available to the
public on a weekly basis following review by the Department.
DATES: Effective March 21, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the SIMA system,
please contact Julie Al-Saadawi (202) 482-1930 or Michael Rollin (202)
482-4978.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The SIMA system has operated under its current authority since
March 21, 2005. Prior to that date, authority for steel import
licensing and monitoring was derived from Proclamation 7529 of March 5,
2002 (67 FR 10553). Pursuant to sections 201 and 203 of the 1974 Trade
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2251, 2253, Proclamation 7529 implemented safeguard
measures with respect to certain imported steel products, placing
temporary tariffs on these steel imports and providing the steel
industry time to restructure. The monitoring system outlined in
Proclamation 7529 required all importers of steel products to obtain a
license from the Department prior to completing their customs entry
summary documentation. This provided a monitoring tool to ensure that
the effectiveness of the steel safeguard measures was not undermined by
large quantities of imports originating from countries that were
excluded from the tariffs.
In Proclamation 7741 of December 4, 2003 (68 FR 68483), the
President terminated the steel safeguard measures, but directed the
Secretary of Commerce to continue the monitoring system until the
earlier of March 21, 2005, or such time as the Secretary of Commerce
established a replacement program. On December 9, 2003, the Department
published a notice stating that the system would continue in effect as
described in Proclamation 7741 until March 21, 2005 (68 FR 68594). On
August 25, 2004, the Department published an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking soliciting comments from the public on whether to continue
the monitoring system beyond March 21, 2005 (69 FR 52211). The
Department changed the program's name from the Steel Import Licensing
and Surge Monitoring program to the Steel Import Monitoring and
Analysis (SIMA) system. The name change was notified in the publication
of the August 2004 advance notice (69 FR 52211). On March 11, 2005, the
Department published an interim final rule responding to the comments
received from the public and implementing a slightly expanded version
of SIMA until March 21, 2009. That interim final rule was followed by
the publication of the final rule on December 5, 2005 (70 FR 72373).
On December 12, 2008, a proposed rule was published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 75624) seeking an extension of the SIMA system through
March 21, 2013 and asking for comments from the public. The Department
received twelve submissions, all of which expressed support for the
extension. On March 18,
[[Page 1184]]
2009, the Department issued the final rule (74 FR 11474) to extend the
application of the SIMA system until March 21, 2013. On November 13,
2012 (77 FR 67593), the Department published a proposed rule seeking
comments on an extension of the SIMA system through March 21, 2017. The
Department received three submissions, all of which expressed support
for the extension. The Department issued the final rule to extend the
application of the SIMA system until March 21, 2017 (78 FR 11090). On
October 13, 2016, the Department published a proposed rule seeking
comments on an extension of the SIMA system through March 21, 2022 (81
FR 70650). The Department received two submissions, both of which
expressed support for the extension. The Department is issuing this
final rule to extend the application of the SIMA system until March 21,
2022. The sole change included in this final rule was extending the
program's lifespan to five years (the program's previous lifespan was
four years--at which time an extension of the program must be
proposed).
The purpose of the SIMA system is to provide steel producers, steel
consumers, importers, and the general public with accurate and timely
information on anticipated imports of certain steel products. Import
licenses, obtained through the Internet-based SIMA licensing system,
are required for U.S. imports of basic steel mill products. Aggregate
import data obtained from the licenses are updated weekly and posted on
the SIMA Web site monitor. Details of the current system can be found
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/steel/license/.
Response to Comments
Submissions received during the public comment period established
in the proposed rule have been considered in preparing this final rule.
Two submissions were received, one from a coalition of nine steel trade
groups (referred to as the ``industry''), and one from a large steel-
producing company in the United States, AK Steel Corporation. Both of
the submissions supported the five-year extension and agreed that the
system is a critical tool that helps the industry closely monitor steel
imports. The comments are summarized below. The two submissions
received are posted on the Federal rulemaking portal at
www.Regulations.gov as well as on the SIMA Web site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/steel/license/.
Comment 1: Commenters strongly support the extension of the SIMA
system for an additional five years. They state that given the current
global overcapacity in steel that is fueling surges in steel imports,
the SIMA system gives the public access to the timeliest information
possible regarding import patterns and changes, particularly increases
in volumes. They also view the system as an important and transparent
tool to support rational decision-making by all interested parties--
steel producers, steel consumers, importers and U.S. government
officials.
Response: The Department agrees that the SIMA system provides the
public valuable and timely information on steel mill imports. The
Department also agrees that making aggregate import volume and pricing
data drawn from the licenses publicly available provides all interested
stakeholders with a more informed understanding of changing market
conditions in a transparent manner.
Comment 2: Commenters state that there is no significant burden on
the steel importing community to comply with the licensing requirements
of the SIMA system, and that this has been confirmed over the last 12
years in its current format, which remains unchanged by the proposed
rule.
Response: The Department agrees that there is no significant burden
on steel importers arising out of SIMA system licensing requirements.
The web-based licensing system is automatic and free of charge. The
Department estimates that it continues to take no longer than ten
minutes to complete the automated license form, and for most
applicants, the time spent is much less.
Comment 3: Commenters suggest that the Department make the SIMA
system permanent rather than extend it for another five years. They
state that the system has proven its effectiveness as an important
analytical tool for both steel producers and consumers.
Response: Broad authority to collect information on imports is
granted to the Secretary of Commerce and delegated to the Director of
the Bureau of the Census. When the original safeguard authority for the
SIMA system granted by the President expired in March 2005, the system
was continued pursuant to this Department of Commerce information
collection authority (13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302). For purposes of
administering the SIMA system, this authority was temporarily
transferred from the Director of the Census Bureau to the Under
Secretary for International Trade for four years. One of the conditions
of the temporary transfer of authority to the Under Secretary for
International Trade was that any future periodic extension of the SIMA
system be notified to the Secretary and subject to review. Therefore,
establishment of a permanent system is not possible under current
authority.
For the reasons discussed above, the proposed rule (19 CFR part
360) is made final without changes.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13132
This rule does not contain policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration at the proposed rule stage, that this rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities as that term is defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The factual basis for the certification is
found in the proposed rule and is not repeated here. No comments were
received on the certification or the economic impacts of this action.
As a result, no final regulatory flexibility analysis is required and
none was prepared.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). These requirements have
been approved by OMB (OMB No. 0625-0245; Expiration Date: 1/31/2018).
Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
less than ten minutes per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection of information are
voluntary, and will be provided confidentially to the extent allowed by
law.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection of information subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection displays a currently valid OMB
Control Number.
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 360
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
[[Page 1185]]
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Steel.
Dated: December 23, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance.
For reasons discussed in the preamble, 19 CFR part 360 is amended
as follows:
PART 360--STEEL IMPORT MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM
0
1. The authority citation for part 360 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.
0
2. Section 360.105 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 360.105 Duration of the steel import licensing requirement.
The licensing program will be in effect through March 21, 2022, but
may be extended upon review and notification in the Federal Register
prior to this expiration date. Licenses will be required on all subject
imports entered during this period, even if the entry summary documents
are not filed until after the expiration of this program. The licenses
will be valid for 10 business days after the expiration of this program
to allow for the final filing of required Customs documentation.
[FR Doc. 2016-31667 Filed 1-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P