Certain Pasta From Italy: Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 820-821 [2016-31886]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
820
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2017 / Notices
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
An individual requesting access to
records on himself or herself should
send a signed, written inquiry to the
same address as stated in the
Notification Procedure section above.
The request letter should be clearly
marked, ‘‘PRIVACY ACT REQUEST.’’
The written inquiry must be signed and
notarized or submitted with certification
of identity under penalty of perjury.
Requesters should specify the record
contents being sought.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
An individual requesting corrections
or contesting information contained in
his or her records must send a signed,
written request inquiry to the same
address as stated in the Notification
Procedure section above. Requesters
should reasonably identify the records,
specify the information they are
contesting and state the corrective
action sought and the reasons for the
correction with supporting justification
showing how the record is incomplete,
untimely, inaccurate, or irrelevant. The
Department’s rules for access, for
contesting contents, and for appealing
initial determination by the individual
concerned appear in 15 CFR part 4,
Appendix B.
except subsections (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10),
and (11), and (i). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), (k)(2) and (k)(5) on condition
that the 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) exemption is
held to be invalid, all investigatory
material in the record which meets the
criteria stated in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1),
(k)(2) and (k)(5) are exempted from the
notice, access, and contest requirements
(under 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f)) of the
agency regulations because of the
necessity to exempt this information
and material in order to accomplish the
law enforcement function of the agency,
to prevent disclosure of classified
information as required by Executive
Order 13526, to assure the protection of
the President, to prevent subjects of
investigation from frustrating the
investigatory process, to prevent the
disclosure of investigative techniques,
to fulfill commitments made to protect
the confidentiality of information, and
to avoid endangering these sources and
law enforcement personnel.
Michael J. Toland,
Department of Commerce, Deputy Chief FOIA
Officer, Department Privacy Act Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–31315 Filed 12–30–16; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–BX–P
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Subject individuals; other Department
of Commerce operating units; OPM, FBI
and other Federal, state and local
agencies; individuals and organizations
that have pertinent knowledge about the
subject; and those authorized by the
individual to furnish information.
These records may contain
information obtained from the
individual; persons having knowledge
of the individual; persons having
knowledge of incidents or other matters
of investigative interest to the
Department; other U.S. law enforcement
agencies and court systems; pertinent
records of other Federal, state, or local
agencies or foreign governments;
pertinent records of private firms or
organizations; the intelligence
community; and other public sources.
The records also contain information
obtained from interviews, review of
records, and other authorized
investigative techniques.
SYSTEM EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS
OF THE ACT:
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), all
information about an individual in the
record which meets the criteria stated in
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) are exempted from
the notice, access and contest
requirements of the agency regulations
and from all parts of 5 U.S.C. 552a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jan 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Partial
Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain pasta from Italy, in part, for the
period of review (POR) January 1, 2015,
through December 31, 2015, based on
the timely withdrawal of requests for
review by seven companies; the
administrative review continues for
Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A.
(Liguori).
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective January 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
On July 5, 2016, the Department
published the notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
CVD order on certain pasta from Italy
for the POR January 1, 2015, through
December 31, 2015.1 On July 29, 2016,
Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l. (Zaffiri), Pastificio
Andalini, S.p.A. (Andalini), Premiato
Pastificio Afeltra S.r.l. (Afeltra), La
Fabbrica della Pasta di Gagnano S.A.S.
di Antonio Moccia (La Fabbrica),
Pastifico Labor S.R.L. (Labor), and
GR.A.M.M. S.R.L. (GR.A.M.M.) each
requested that the Department conduct
an administrative review of their
exports of subject merchandise.2 On
August 1, 2016, Liguori and Tesa SrL
(Tesa) also requested that the
Department conduct an administrative
review of their exports of subject
merchandise.3 Pursuant to the requests
received, and in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(b), the Department
initiated an administrative review of
GR.A.M.M., La Fabbrica, Liguori,
Andalini,, Labor, Zaffiri, Afeltra, and
Tesa.4
On November 7, 2016, Tesa timely
withdrew its request for administrative
review.5 On December 12, 2016, La
Fabbrica, GR.A.M.M., Labor, Afeltra,
Zaffiri, and Andalini timely withdrew
their requests for an administrative
review.6
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 43584
(July 5, 2016).
2 See letter from Zaffiri, re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from
Italy, C–475–819; Request for Administrative
Review by Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l.,’’ dated July 29,
2016; see also letter from Andalini, re: ‘‘Certain
Pasta from Italy, C–475–819; Request for
Administrative Review by Pastificio Andalini,
S.p.A.,’’ dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from
Afeltra, re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–819;
Request for Administrative Review by Premiato
Pastificio Afeltra S.r.l.,’’ dated July 29, 2016; see
also letter from La Fabbrica, re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from
Italy, C–475–819; Request for Administrative
Review by La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gagnano
S.A.S.,’’ dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from
Labor, re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–819;
Request for Administrative Review by Labor
S.R.L.,’’ dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from
GR.A.M.M., re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–
819; Request for Administrative Review by
GR.A.M.M. S.R.L.,’’ dated July 29, 2016.
3 See letter from Liguori, re: Certain Pasta from
Italy: Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
Request,’’ dated August 1, 2016; see also letter from
Tesa, re: ‘‘Pasta from Italy; Request for
Administrative Review,’’ dated August 1, 2016.
4 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR
62720 (September 12, 2016).
5 See letter from Tesa, ‘‘Pasta from Italy:
Withdrawal of request for administrative review,’’
dated November 7, 2016.
6 See letter from La Fabbrica della Pasta di
Gragnano S.A.S., re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy,
C–475–819; Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review by La Fabbrica della Pasta
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 4, 2017 / Notices
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party or parties that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. As
noted above, requests for review were
withdrawn, and parties withdrew their
requests within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation. Therefore, in accordance with
1 9 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding
this review with respect to Tesa, La
Fabbrica, GR.A.M.M., Labor, Afeltra,
Zaffiri, and Andalini. The
administrative review will continue
with respect to Liguori.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries of certain pasta from
Italy. For the companies for which this
review is rescinded, countervailing
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated
countervailing duties required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under an APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Timely written notification of the return
or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order,
di Gragnano S.A.S.,’’ dated December 12, 2016; see
also letter from GR.A.M.M. Srl, re: Certain Pasta
from Italy, C–475–819; Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review by GR.A.MM. Srl,’’ dated
December 12, 2016; see also letter from Labor Srl,
re: ‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–819;
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
by Labor Srl,’’ dated December 12, 2016; see also
letter from Premiato Pastificio Afeltra S.r.l., re:
‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–819; Withdrawal
of Request for Administrative Review by Premiato
Pastificio Afeltra S.rl.,’’ dated December 12, 2016;
see also letter from Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l., re:
‘‘Certain Pasta from Italy, C–475–819; Withdrawal
of Request for Administrative Review by Pastificio
Zaffiri S.r.l..,’’ dated December 12, 2016; see also
letter from Pastifico Andalini, S.p.A., re: ‘‘Certain
Pasta from Italy, C–475–819; Withdrawal of Request
for Administrative Review by Pastificio Andalini,
S.p.A.,’’ dated December 12, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jan 03, 2017
Jkt 241001
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 35l.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 28, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016–31886 Filed 1–3–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–588–873]
Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From Japan: Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review, and Intent To Revoke Order in
Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) has initiated a
changed circumstances review of, and is
preliminarily revoking, in part, the
antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on
certain cold-rolled steel flat products
from Japan with respect to certain light
gage cold-rolled flat-rolled steel for
porcelain enameling meeting the
requirements of ASTM A424 Type 1.
The Department invites interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Effective January 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Bolling, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3434.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 14, 2016, the Department
published an AD order on certain coldrolled steel flat products from Japan.1
On November 14, 2016, members of
the domestic cold-rolled steel industry,
ArcelorMittal USA LLC, AK Steel
Corporation, Nucor Corporation, Steel
Dynamics Inc., and United States Steel
Corporation (collectively, ‘‘domestic
1 See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from
Japan and the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 45956 (July 14,
2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
821
producers’’ or ‘‘Petitioners’’ 2), requested
that the Department conduct a changed
circumstances review, to revoke, in part,
the AD order on certain cold-rolled steel
flat products from Japan with respect to
certain light gage cold-rolled flat-rolled
steel for porcelain enameling meeting
the requirements of ASTM A424 Type 1.
We did not receive comments from any
other party.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain cold-rolled (coldreduced),
flat-rolled steel products, whether or not
annealed, painted, varnished, or coated
with plastics or other non-metallic
substances. The products covered do
not include those that are clad, plated,
or coated with metal. The products
covered include coils that have a width
or other lateral measurement (‘‘width’’)
of 12.7 mm or greater, regardless of form
of coil (e.g., in successively
superimposed layers, spirally
oscillating, etc.). The products covered
also include products not in coils (e.g.,
in straight lengths) of a thickness less
than 4.75 mm and a width that is 12.7
mm or greater and that measures at least
10 times the thickness. The products
covered also include products not in
coils (e.g., in straight lengths) of a
thickness of 4.75 mm or more and a
width exceeding 150 mm and measuring
at least twice the thickness. The
products described above may be
rectangular, square, circular, or other
shape and include products of either
rectangular or non-rectangular cross
section where such cross-section is
achieved subsequent to the rolling
process, i.e., products which have been
‘‘worked after rolling’’ (e.g., products
which have been beveled or rounded at
the edges). For purposes of the width
and thickness requirements referenced
above:
(1) Where the nominal and actual
measurements vary, a product is within
the scope if application of either the
nominal or actual measurement would
place it within the scope based on the
definitions set forth above, and
(2) where the width and thickness
vary for a specific product (e.g., the
thickness of certain products with nonrectangular cross-section, the width of
certain products with non-rectangular
shape, etc.), the measurement at its
greatest width or thickness applies.
2 Each of these domestic producers was a
petitioner in the investigation on cold-rolled steel
flat products from Japan. See Certain Cold-Rolled
Steel Flat Products from Japan: Affirmative
Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 81 FR
11747, 11748 n. 10 (March 7, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM
04JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 820-821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31886]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-475-819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Partial Rescission of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is rescinding the
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain
pasta from Italy, in part, for the period of review (POR) January 1,
2015, through December 31, 2015, based on the timely withdrawal of
requests for review by seven companies; the administrative review
continues for Liguori Pastificio dal 1820 S.p.A. (Liguori).
DATES: Effective January 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Kolberg, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 5, 2016, the Department published the notice of opportunity
to request an administrative review of the CVD order on certain pasta
from Italy for the POR January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015.\1\
On July 29, 2016, Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l. (Zaffiri), Pastificio
Andalini, S.p.A. (Andalini), Premiato Pastificio Afeltra S.r.l.
(Afeltra), La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gagnano S.A.S. di Antonio Moccia
(La Fabbrica), Pastifico Labor S.R.L. (Labor), and GR.A.M.M. S.R.L.
(GR.A.M.M.) each requested that the Department conduct an
administrative review of their exports of subject merchandise.\2\ On
August 1, 2016, Liguori and Tesa SrL (Tesa) also requested that the
Department conduct an administrative review of their exports of subject
merchandise.\3\ Pursuant to the requests received, and in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(b), the Department initiated an administrative
review of GR.A.M.M., La Fabbrica, Liguori, Andalini,, Labor, Zaffiri,
Afeltra, and Tesa.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 81 FR 43584 (July 5, 2016).
\2\ See letter from Zaffiri, re: ``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-
475-819; Request for Administrative Review by Pastificio Zaffiri
S.r.l.,'' dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from Andalini, re:
``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Request for Administrative
Review by Pastificio Andalini, S.p.A.,'' dated July 29, 2016; see
also letter from Afeltra, re: ``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819;
Request for Administrative Review by Premiato Pastificio Afeltra
S.r.l.,'' dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from La Fabbrica, re:
``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Request for Administrative
Review by La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gagnano S.A.S.,'' dated July
29, 2016; see also letter from Labor, re: ``Certain Pasta from
Italy, C-475-819; Request for Administrative Review by Labor
S.R.L.,'' dated July 29, 2016; see also letter from GR.A.M.M., re:
``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Request for Administrative
Review by GR.A.M.M. S.R.L.,'' dated July 29, 2016.
\3\ See letter from Liguori, re: Certain Pasta from Italy:
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review Request,'' dated August 1,
2016; see also letter from Tesa, re: ``Pasta from Italy; Request for
Administrative Review,'' dated August 1, 2016.
\4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 62720 (September 12, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 7, 2016, Tesa timely withdrew its request for
administrative review.\5\ On December 12, 2016, La Fabbrica, GR.A.M.M.,
Labor, Afeltra, Zaffiri, and Andalini timely withdrew their requests
for an administrative review.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See letter from Tesa, ``Pasta from Italy: Withdrawal of
request for administrative review,'' dated November 7, 2016.
\6\ See letter from La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gragnano S.A.S.,
re: ``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review by La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gragnano
S.A.S.,'' dated December 12, 2016; see also letter from GR.A.M.M.
Srl, re: Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-819; Withdrawal of Request
for Administrative Review by GR.A.MM. Srl,'' dated December 12,
2016; see also letter from Labor Srl, re: ``Certain Pasta from
Italy, C-475-819; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review by
Labor Srl,'' dated December 12, 2016; see also letter from Premiato
Pastificio Afeltra S.r.l., re: ``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-475-
819; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review by Premiato
Pastificio Afeltra S.rl.,'' dated December 12, 2016; see also letter
from Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l., re: ``Certain Pasta from Italy, C-
475-819; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review by
Pastificio Zaffiri S.r.l..,'' dated December 12, 2016; see also
letter from Pastifico Andalini, S.p.A., re: ``Certain Pasta from
Italy, C-475-819; Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review by
Pastificio Andalini, S.p.A.,'' dated December 12, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 821]]
Partial Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
As noted above, requests for review were withdrawn, and parties
withdrew their requests within 90 days of the publication date of the
notice of initiation. Therefore, in accordance with 1 9 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this review with respect to Tesa, La
Fabbrica, GR.A.M.M., Labor, Afeltra, Zaffiri, and Andalini. The
administrative review will continue with respect to Liguori.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of
certain pasta from Italy. For the companies for which this review is
rescinded, countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to
the cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to
issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date
of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
Notifications
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(l) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 35l.213(d)(4).
Dated: December 28, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016-31886 Filed 1-3-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
