Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 3 to Proposed Rule Change Amending the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange To Add Certain Access and Connectivity Fees, 96053-96060 [2016-31486]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Effective date: December 29, Product Change—Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement ACTION: 2016. are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017–64, CP2017–92. POSTAL SERVICE AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 21, 2016, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 280 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017–60, CP2017–88. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–31517 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement [FR Doc. 2016–31522 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P Notice. The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. DATES: Effective date: December 29, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 21, 2016, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Select Contract 18 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017–65, CP2017–93. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–31523 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am] ACTION: Postal ServiceTM. BILLING CODE 7710–12–P Notice. The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. SUMMARY: DATES: Effective date: December 29, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 21, 2016, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 39 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2017–63, CP2017–91. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Federal Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–31520 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 POSTAL SERVICE Product Change—Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement AGENCY: ACTION: Postal ServiceTM. Notice. The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule’s Competitive Products List. SUMMARY: 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Stanley F. Mires, Attorney, Federal Compliance. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: AGENCY: 96053 DATES: Effective date: December 29, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179. The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on December 21, 2016, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 40 to Competitive Product List. Documents SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–79674; File No. SR–NYSE– 2016–45] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 3 to Proposed Rule Change Amending the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange To Add Certain Access and Connectivity Fees December 22, 2016. On July 29, 2016, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to amend the co-location services offered by the Exchange to: (1) Provide additional information regarding the access to various trading and execution services; connectivity to market data feeds and testing and certification feeds; connectivity to Third Party Systems; and connectivity to DTCC provided to Users using data center local area networks; and (2) establish fees relating to a User’s access to various trading and execution services; connectivity to market data feeds and testing and certification feeds; connectivity to DTCC; and other services. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 17, 2016.3 The Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on August 16, 2016.4 Amendment No. 1 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 78556 (August 11, 2016), 81 FR 54877. 4 Amendment No. 1 (i) amended the third party data feed MSCI from 20 Gigabite (‘‘Gb’’) to 25 Gb and amended the price from $2,000 to $1,200; (ii) clarified the costs associated with providing a greater amount of bandwidth for Premium NYSE Data Products for a particular market as compared to the bandwidth requirements for the Included Data Products for that same market; (iii) provided further details on Premium NYSE Data Products, including their composition, product release dates, and further detail on the reasonableness of their applicable fees; (iv) added an explanation for the varying fee differences for the same Gb usage for third party data feeds, DTCC, and Virtual Control Circuit. 2 17 E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 96054 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 26, 2016.5 The Commission received one comment in response to the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 and the Exchange responded.6 On October 4, 2016, the Commission extended the time period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to November 15, 2016.7 On November 2, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.8 On November 21, 2016, the Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2.9 In response to the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission received additional comment letters regarding the proposed rule change.10 On December 9, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change from interested persons. execution services; connectivity to third party data feeds and testing and certification feeds; access to clearing; and other services. In addition, this proposed rule change reflects changes to the Exchange’s Price List related to these co-location services. This Amendment No. 3 supersedes the original filing and Amendments 1 and 2 in their entirety.11 The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Amendment The Exchange proposes to amend the co-location services offered by the Exchange to establish fees relating to Users’ access to third party trading and 11 The Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has issued an order instituting proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by amendments 1 and 2. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79316 (November 15, 2016), 81 FR 83303 (November 21, 2016) (SR–NYSE–2016–45) (the ‘‘November 15 Order’’). In its filing, as amended by amendments 1 and 2, the Exchange proposed adding to the Price List (a) a more detailed description of the connectivity to certain market data products (the ‘‘Included Data Products’’) that Users receive with connections to the local area networks available in the data center; and (b) connectivity fees for connecting to other market data products of the Exchange and its affiliates, NYSE MKT LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Premium NYSE Data Products’’). In the November 15 Order, the Commission cites language from the proposed rule change: the Exchange also stated that the expectation of co-location was that normally Users would expect reduced latencies in . . . receiving market data from the Exchange by being colocated. Therefore, as the Exchange states in Amendment No. 2, both Included Data Products and Premium NYSE Data Products are ‘directly related to the purpose of colocation.’ Id., at 83307. It goes on to say that, if Included Data Products and Premium NYSE Data Products are ‘‘integral to co-located Users for trading on the Exchange,’’ it was questionable whether obtaining the information from another source is a viable alternative. Id. The Exchange disagrees with the Commission’s description of Included Data Products and Premium NYSE Data Products as ‘‘integral’’ to Users for trading on the Exchange. Being related to the purpose of co-location is not the same as being integral for trading. A User is not required to receive either Included Data Products or Premium NYSE Data Products in order to trade on the Exchange. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 78887 (September 20, 2016), 81 FR 66095. 6 See letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy Officer, Investors Exchange LLC (IEX), dated September 9, 2016. On September 23, 2016, the NYSE submitted a response to the IEX letter. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34– 78966 (September 28, 2016), 81 FR 68475. 8 Amendment No. 2 is available on the Commission’s Web site at https://www.sec.gov/ comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-4.pdf. 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release 34–79316 (November 15, 2016), 81 FR 83303. 10 See letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Adam C. Cooper, Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer, Citadel Securities, dated December 12, 2016; letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Melissa MacGregor, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, SIFMA, dated December 12, 2016; letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Joe Wald, Chief Executive Officer, Clearpool Group, dated December 16, 2016; letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy Officer, Investors Exchange LLC (IEX), dated December 21, 2016. All comments received by the Commission on the proposed rule change are available on the Commission’s Web site at: https://www.sec.gov/ comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645.shtml. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend the co-location 12 services offered by the Exchange to establish fees relating to Users’ 13 access to third party trading and execution services; connectivity to third party data feeds and testing and certification feeds; access to clearing; and other services. More specifically, the Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to include: a. Fees for connectivity to: • The execution systems of third party markets and other content service providers (‘‘Third Party Systems’’); • data feeds from third party markets and other content service providers (the ‘‘Third Party Data Feeds’’); • third party testing and certification feeds; • Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (‘‘DTCC’’) services; and b. fees for virtual control circuits (‘‘VCCs’’) between two Users. VCCs are unicast connections between two participants over dedicated bandwidth.14 The Exchange provides access to the Third Party Systems (‘‘Access’’) and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds, and DTCC (collectively, ‘‘Connectivity’’) as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or Connectivity is completely voluntary, and several other 12 The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its co-location services with the Commission in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62960 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59310 (September 27, 2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–56) (the ‘‘Original Co-location Filing’’). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from which it provides co-location services to Users. 13 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant that requests to receive co-location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76008 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60190 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–40). As specified in the Price List, a User that incurs colocation fees for a particular co-location service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-location fees for the same co-location service charged by the Exchange’s affiliates NYSE MKT LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’) and NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ and, together with NYSE MKT, the ‘‘Affiliate SROs’’). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70206 (August 15, 2013), 78 FR 51765 (August 21, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–59). 14 Information flows over existing network connections in two formats: ‘‘unicast’’ format, which is a format that allows one-to-one communication, similar to a phone line, in which information is sent to and from the Exchange; and ‘‘multicast’’ format, which is a format in which information is sent one-way from the Exchange to multiple recipients at once, like a radio broadcast. E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices access and connectivity options are available to a User. As alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and products through another User or through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the data center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third party telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the Exchange’s Secure Financial Transaction Infrastructure (‘‘SFTI’’) network, or a combination thereof. Similarly, the Exchange provides VCCs as a convenience to Users. Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an alternative to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through a fiber connection (‘‘cross connect’’).15 interest in the Third Party Systems. Establishing a User’s access to a Third Party System does not give the Exchange any right to use the Third Party Systems. Connectivity to a Third Party System does not provide access or order entry to the Exchange’s execution system, and a User’s connection to a Third Party System is not through the Exchange’s execution system.18 The Exchange charges a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to a Third Party System. Specifically, when a User requests access to a Third Party System, it identifies the applicable third party market or other content service provider and what bandwidth connection it requires. The monthly recurring fee the Exchange charges Users for unicast connectivity to each Third Party System varies by the bandwidth of the connection, as follows: Connectivity asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Connectivity to Third Party Systems The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to provide that Users may obtain connectivity to Third Party Systems of multiple third party markets and other content service providers for a fee. Users connect to Third Party Systems over the internet protocol (‘‘IP’’) network, a local area network available in the data center.16 The Exchange selects what connectivity to Third Party Systems to offer in the data center based on User demand. In order to obtain access to a Third Party System, a User enters into an agreement with the relevant third party content service provider, pursuant to which the third party content service provider charges the User for access to the Third Party System. The Exchange then establishes a unicast connection between the User and the relevant third party content service provider over the IP network. The Exchange charges the User for the connectivity to the Third Party System. A User only receives, and is only charged for, access to Third Party Systems for which it enters into agreements with the third party content service provider. With the exception of the Intercontinental Exchange (‘‘ICE’’) feed,17 the Exchange has no ownership 15 See Original Co-location Filing, supra note 5, at 59311 and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74222 (February 6, 2015), 80 FR 7888 (February 12, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–05) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include IP network connections and fiber cross connects between a User’s cabinet and non-User’s equipment as co-location services) (the ‘‘IP Network Release’’). 16 See id., at 7889. 17 ICE is owned by the Exchange’s ultimate parent, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., and so the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 Bandwidth of connection to third party system Monthly recurring fee per connection to third party system 1 Mb ...................................... 3 Mb ...................................... 5 Mb ...................................... 10 Mb .................................... 25 Mb .................................... 50 Mb .................................... 100 Mb .................................. 200 Mb .................................. 1 Gb ...................................... $200 400 500 800 1,200 1,800 2,500 3,000 3,500 The Exchange provides connectivity to the following Third Party Systems: Americas Trading Group (ATG) BATS Boston Options Exchange (BOX) Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) Credit Suisse International Securities Exchange (ISE) Nasdaq National Stock Exchange NYFIX Marketplace In addition to the connectivity fees, the Exchange proposes to add language to its Price List stating the following: Pricing for access to the execution systems of third party markets and other service providers (Third Party Systems) is for connectivity only. Connectivity to Third Party Systems is subject to any technical provisioning requirements and authorization from the provider of the data feed. Exchange has an indirect interest in the ICE feeds. The ICE feeds include both market data and trading and clearing services, but the Exchange includes it as a Third Party Data Feed. In order for a User to receive an ICE feed, ICE must provide authorization for the User to receive both data and trading and clearing services. 18 The Exchange has a dedicated network connection to each of the Third Party Systems. PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 96055 Connectivity to Third Party Systems is over the IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently by the relevant third party content service provider. The Exchange is not the exclusive method to connect to Third Party Systems. Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to provide that Users may obtain connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds for a fee. The Exchange receives Third Party Data Feeds from multiple national securities exchanges and other content service providers at its data center. It then provides connectivity to that data to Users for a fee. With the exceptions of Global OTC and NYSE Global Index, Users connect to Third Party Data Feeds over the IP network.19 The Exchange notes that charging Users a monthly fee for connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds is consistent with the monthly fee Nasdaq charges its co-location customers for connectivity to third party data. For instance, Nasdaq charges its co-location customers monthly fees of $1,500 and $4,000 for connectivity to BATS Y and BATS, respectively, and of $2,500 for connectivity to EDGA or EDGX.20 In order to connect to a Third Party Data Feed, a User enters into a contract with the relevant third party market or other content service provider, pursuant to which the content service provider charges the User for the Third Party Data Feed. The Exchange receives the Third Party Data Feed over its fiber optic network and, after the data provider and User enter into the contract and the Exchange receives authorization from the data provider, the Exchange re-transmits the data to the User over the User’s port. The Exchange charges the User for the connectivity to the Third Party Data Feed. A User only receives, and is only charged for, connectivity to the Third Party Data Feeds for which it enters into contracts. With the exception of the ICE, Global OTC and NYSE Global Index feeds,21 19 See IP Network Release, supra note 8, at 7889 (‘‘The IP network also provides Users with access to away market data products.’’). Users can connect to Global OTC and NYSE Global Index over the IP network or the Liquidity Center Network (‘‘LCN’’), a local area network available in the data center. 20 See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034. 21 ICE and the Global OTC alternative trading system are both owned by the Exchange’s ultimate parent, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., and so the Exchange has an indirect interest in the ICE and Global OTC feeds. The NYSE Global Index feed includes index and exchange traded product valuations data, with data drawn from the Exchange, the Affiliate SROs, and third party exchanges. Because it includes third party data, the NYSE Global Index feed is considered a Third Party Data Feed. As with all Third Party Data Feeds, the E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM Continued 29DEN1 96056 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices the Exchange has no affiliation with the sellers of the Third Party Data Feeds. It has no right to use the Third Party Data Feeds other than as a redistributor of the data. The Third Party Data Feeds do not provide access or order entry to the Exchange’s execution system. With the exception of the ICE feeds, the Third Party Data Feeds do not provide access or order entry to the execution systems of the third party generating the feed.22 The Exchange receives Third Party Data Feeds via arms-length agreements and it has no inherent advantage over any other distributor of such data. The Exchange charges a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to each Third Party Data Feed. The monthly recurring fee is per Third Party Data Feed, with the exception that the monthly recurring feed for SuperFeed and MSCI varies by the bandwidth of the connection. Depending on its needs and bandwidth, a User may opt to receive all or some of the feeds or services included in a Third Party Data Feed. The following table shows the feeds that connectivity to each Third Party Data Feed provides, together with the applicable monthly recurring fee. asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Third party data feed Bats BZX Exchange (BZX) and Bats BYX Exchange (BYX) ................................. Bats EDGX Exchange (EDGX) and Bats EDGA Exchange (EDGA) ............ Boston Options Exchange (BOX) ................................ Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) ................. Chicago Stock Exchange (CHX) ................................ Euronext ............................... Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) .............. Global OTC ........................... Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) .................................. ´ Montreal Exchange (MX) ...... MSCI 5 Mb ........................... MSCI 25 Mb ......................... NASDAQ Stock Market ........ NASDAQ OMX Global Index Data Service ..................... NASDAQ OMDF ................... NASDAQ UQDF & UTDF ..... Monthly recurring connectivity fee per third party data feed $2,000 2,000 1,000 2,000 400 600 500 100 1,500 1,000 500 1,200 2,000 100 100 500 Exchange is not the exclusive method to connect to the ICE, Global OTC or NYSE Global Index feeds. 22 Unlike other Third Party Data Feeds, the ICE feeds include both market data and trading and clearing services. In order to receive the ICE feeds, a User must receive authorization from ICE to receive both market data and trading and clearing services. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 any of the relevant content service provider’s requirements for accessing Third Party Systems or receiving Third Third party data feed Party Data, while testing feeds provide Users an environment in which to conduct tests with non-live data.24 Such NYSE Global Index .............. 100 feeds, which are solely used for OTC Markets Group ............. 1,000 certification and testing and do not SR Labs—SuperFeed ≤500 carry live production data, are available Mb ..................................... 250 over the IP network. SR Labs—SuperFeed >500 The Exchange proposes to revise the Mb to ≤1.25 Gb ................. 800 Price List to include connectivity to SR Labs—SuperFeed >1.25 Gb ..................................... 1,000 third party certification and testing TMX Group ........................... 2,500 feeds. The Exchange charges a connectivity fee of $100 per month per feed. In addition to the above connectivity The Exchange proposes to add the fees, the Exchange proposes to add the following connectivity fees and following language to its Price List: language to its Price List: Pricing for data feeds from third party Connectivity to third party certification markets and other content service providers and testing feeds—$100 monthly (Third Party Data Feeds) is for connectivity recurring fee per feed. only. Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds is subject to any technical provisioning The Exchange provides connectivity requirements and authorization from the to third party testing and certification provider of the data feed. Connectivity to feeds provided by third party markets Third Party Data Feeds is over the IP and other content service providers. network, with the exception that Users can Pricing for third party testing and connect to Global OTC and NYSE Global certification feeds is for connectivity Index over the IP network or LCN. Market only. Connectivity to third party testing data fees are charged independently by the relevant third party market or content service and certification feeds is subject to any provider. The Exchange is not the exclusive technical provisioning requirements and method to connect to Third Party Data Feeds. authorization from the provider of the data feed. Connectivity to third party Third Party Data Feed providers may testing and certification feeds is over the charge redistribution fees, such as Nasdaq’s Extranet Access Fees and OTC IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently by the relevant Markets Group’s Access Fees.23 When third party market or content service the Exchange receives a redistribution provider. The Exchange is not the fee, it passes through the charge to the User, without change to the fee. The fee exclusive method to connect to third party testing and certification feeds. is labeled as a pass-through of a redistribution fee on the User’s invoice. Connectivity to DTCC The Exchange proposes to add language The Exchange provides Users to the Price List accordingly. connectivity to DTCC for clearing, fund The Exchange provides third party transfer, insurance, and settlement markets or content providers that are services.25 The Exchange proposes to also Users connectivity to their own revise the Price List to include Third Party Data Feeds. The Exchange connectivity to DTCC. The Exchange does not charge Users that are third charges a connectivity fee of $500 per party markets or content providers for month for connections to DTCC of 5 Mb connectivity to their own feeds, as in and $2,500 for connections of 50 Mb. the Exchange’s experience such parties Connectivity to DTCC is available over generally receive their own feeds for purposes of diagnostics and testing. The the IP network. In order to connect to DTCC, a User Exchange proposes to add language to enters into a contract with DTCC, the Price List accordingly. pursuant to which DTCC charges the Connectivity to Third Party Testing and User for the services provided. The Certification Feeds Exchange receives the DTCC feed over The Exchange offers Users 24 For example, a User that trades on a third party connectivity to third party certification and testing feeds. Certification feeds are exchange may wish to test the exchange’s upcoming releases and product releases or may wish to test used to certify that a User conforms to a new algorithm in a testing environment prior to Monthly recurring connectivity fee per third party data feed 23 See NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Rule 7025, ‘‘Extranet Access Fee’’, and OTC Markets Market Data Distribution Agreement Appendix B, ‘‘Fees’’ at https://www.otcmarkets.com/content/doc/marketdata-fees-2016.pdf. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74040 (January 13, 2015), 80 FR 2460 (January 16, 2015) (SR–NASDAQ–2015–003). PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 making it live. 25 Such connectivity to DTCC is distinct from the access to shared data services for clearing and settlement services that a User receives when it purchases access to the LCN or IP network. The shared data services allow Users and other entities with access to the Trading Systems to post files for settlement and clearing services to access. E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices its fiber optic network and, after DTCC and the User enter into the services contract and the Exchange receives authorization from DTCC, the Exchange provides connectivity to DTCC to the User over the User’s IP network port. The Exchange charges the User for the connectivity to DTCC. Connectivity to DTCC does not provide access or order entry to the Exchange’s execution system, and a User’s connection to DTCC is not through the Exchange’s execution system. The Exchange proposes to add the following connectivity fees and language to its Price List: 5 Mb connection to DTCC—$500 monthly recurring fee. 50 Mb connection to DTCC—$2,500 monthly recurring fee. Pricing for connectivity to DTCC feeds is for connectivity only. Connectivity to DTCC feeds is subject to any technical provisioning requirements and authorization from DTCC. Connectivity to DTCC feeds is over the IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently by DTCC. The Exchange is not the exclusive method to connect to DTCC feeds. Virtual Control Circuits Finally, the Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to offer VCCs Type of Service 1 Mb ............... 3 Mb ............... 5 Mb ............... 10 Mb ............. 25 Mb ............. 50 Mb ............. 100 Mb ........... General As is the case with all Exchange colocation arrangements, (i) neither a User nor any of the User’s customers would be permitted to submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of the colocation services proposed herein would be completely voluntary and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; 26 and (iii) a User would only incur one charge for the particular colocation service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or both the Affiliate SROs.27 The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the Exchange is not asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES between two Users. VCCs are connections between two points over dedicated bandwidth using the IP network. A VCC (previously called a ‘‘peer to peer’’ connection) is a two-way connection which the two participants can use for any purpose. The Exchange bills the User requesting the VCC, but will not set up a VCC until the other User confirms that it wishes to have the VCC set up. The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to include VCCs between two Users. The fee for VCCs is based on the bandwidth utilized, as follows: Description Virtual Control Circuit between two Users .................................. 26 As is currently the case, Users that receive colocation services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and execution systems that is separate from, or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and execution systems through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do not receive any market data or data service product that is not available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange. 27 See SR–NYSE–2013–59, supra note 6 at 51766. The Affiliate SROs have also submitted substantially the same proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein. See SR– NYSEMKT–2016–63 and SR–NYSEArca–2016–89. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 Amount of Charge $200 monthly charge. 400 monthly charge. 500 monthly charge. 800 monthly charge. 1,200 monthly charge. 1,800 monthly charge. 2,500 monthly charge. aware of any problems that Users would have in complying with the proposed change. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,28 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,29 in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because, by offering Access and Connectivity, the Exchange gives each User additional options for addressing its access and connectivity needs, responding to User demand for access and connectivity 28 15 29 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 96057 options. Providing Access and Connectivity helps each User tailor its data center operations to the requirements of its business operations by allowing it to select the form and latency of access and connectivity that best suits its needs. The Exchange provides Access and Connectivity as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or Connectivity is completely voluntary, and each User has several other access and connectivity options available to it. As alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and products through another User or through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the data center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third party telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the SFTI network, or a combination thereof. The Exchange believes that providing access to Third Party Systems and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds and DTCC, as well as revising the Price List to describe such services, would remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protect investors and the public interest because the proposed changes would make the descriptions of market participants’ access and connectivity options and the related fees more accessible and E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 96058 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES transparent, thereby providing market participants with clarity as to what options for connectivity are available to them and what the related costs are. Including a description of the access to Third Party Systems and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds that Users receive is consistent with Nasdaq’s Rule 7034, which includes similar information.30 In addition, the Exchange believes that providing connectivity to third party testing and certification feeds removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protects investors and the public interest because such feeds provide Users an environment in which to conduct tests with non-live data, including testing for upcoming releases and product enhancements or the User’s own software development, and allow Users to certify conformance to any applicable technical requirements. Similarly, the Exchange believes that providing connectivity to DTCC removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protects investors and the public interest because it provides efficient connection to clearing, fund transfer, insurance, and settlement services. The Exchange believes that providing Users with VCCs removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system because VCCs provide each User with an additional option for connectivity to another User, helping it tailor its data center operations to the requirements of its business operations by allowing it to select the form of connectivity that best suits its needs. The Exchange provides VCCs as a convenience to Users. Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an alternative to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through a cross connect. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,31 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons 30 See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034—Market Data Connectivity (‘‘Pricing is for connectivity only and is similar to connectivity fees imposed by other vendors. The fees are generally based on the amount of bandwidth needed to accommodate a particular feed and Nasdaq is not the exclusive method to get market data connectivity. Market data fees are charged independently by the Nasdaq Stock Market and other exchanges.’’) 31 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees changes are consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act for multiple reasons. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the trading and other market activities of those market participants who believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations. Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from, such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange’s data center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies less dependent upon the lower exchange-toparticipant latency associated with colocation. Accordingly, the exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but also the liquidity of the formerly colocated trading firms, which could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue of the affected exchange. The Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein are equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because, in addition to the services being completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the same products and services are available to all Users). All Users that voluntarily select to receive access to Third Party Systems, connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds and DTCC, or a VCC between Users, would be charged the same amount for the same services. The Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein are reasonable, equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange provides Access and Connectivity as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or Connectivity is completely voluntary, and each User has several other access and connectivity options available to it. As alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and products through another User or through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the data PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third party telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the SFTI network, or a combination thereof. Users that opt to use Access or Connectivity would not receive access or connectivity that is not available to all Users, as all market participants that contract with the relevant market or content provider may receive access or connectivity. Similarly, the Exchange provides VCCs between Users as a convenience to Users. Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an alternative to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through a cross connect. The Exchange believes that the proposed charges are reasonable, equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange offers Access, Connectivity, and VCCs as conveniences to Users, but in order to do so must provide, maintain and operate the data center facility hardware and technology infrastructure. The Exchange must handle the installation, administration, monitoring, support and maintenance of such services, including by responding to any production issues. Since the inception of co-location, the Exchange has made numerous improvements to the network hardware and technology infrastructure and has established additional administrative controls. The Exchange has expanded the network infrastructure to keep pace with the increased number of services available to Users, including the increasing bandwidth required for Access and Connectivity, including resilient and redundant feeds. In addition, in order to provide connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, Third Party Systems, third party testing and certification feeds and DTCC, the Exchange must maintain multiple connections to each Third Party Data Feed, Third Party System, and DTCC, allowing the Exchange to provide resilient and redundant connections; adapt to any changes made by the relevant third party; and cover any applicable fees (other than redistribution fees) charged by the relevant third party, such as port fees. The Exchange believes that charging separate connectivity fees for Third Party Data Feeds and access to Third Party Systems, third party testing and certification feeds and connectivity to DTCC is reasonable and not unfairly discriminatory because, in the Exchange’s experience, not all Users connect to Third Party Data Feeds, Third Party Systems, third party testing and certification feeds or DTCC. By E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM 29DEN1 asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices charging only those Users that receive such connectivity, only the Users that directly benefit from it support its cost. In addition, Users are not required to use any of their bandwidth to connect to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds or DTCC, or to access Third Party Systems, unless they wish to do so. The Exchange believes the fees for connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with offering Users connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds while providing Users the convenience of receiving such Third Party Data Feeds within co-location, helping them tailor their data center operations to the requirements of their business operations by allowing them to select the form and latency of connectivity that best suits their needs. The Exchange believes that its proposed charges for connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds are similar to the connectivity fees Nasdaq imposes on its co-location customers. For instance, Nasdaq charges its co-location customers monthly fees of $1,500 and $4,000 for connectivity to BATS Y and BATS, respectively, and of $2,500 for connectivity to EDGA or EDGX.32 The Exchange believes that its connectivity fees for access to Third Party Systems are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with offering such access while providing Users the convenience of being able to access such Third Party Systems, helping them tailor their data center operations to the requirements of their business operations by allowing them to select the form and latency of connectivity that best suits their needs. Similarly, the Exchange believes that its fees for connectivity to DTCC are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with offering such access while providing Users the benefit of an efficient connection to clearing, fund transfer, insurance, and settlement services. The monthly recurring fees the Exchange charges Users for connectivity to Third Party Systems, the MSCI and SuperFeed Third Party Data Feeds, and DTCC, as well as for VCCs between Users, vary by the bandwidth of the connection. The Exchange also believes such fees are reasonable because the monthly recurring fee varies by the bandwidth of the connection, and so is generally proportional to the bandwidth required. The Exchange notes that some of the monthly recurring fees for 32 See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 connectivity to SuperFeed and DTCC differ from the fees for the other connections of the same bandwidth. The Exchange believes that such difference in pricing is reasonable, equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because, although the bandwidth may be the same, the competitive considerations and the costs the Exchange incurs in providing such connections and VCCs may differ. The Exchange also believes that its connectivity fees for access to third party testing and certification feeds are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with offering such access while providing Users the benefit of having an environment in which to conduct tests with non-live data, including testing for upcoming releases and product enhancements or the User’s own software development, and to certify conformance to any applicable technical requirements. The Exchange believes it is reasonable that redistribution fees charged by providers of Third Party Data Feeds are passed through to the User, without change to the fee. If not passed through, the cost of the re-distribution fees would be factored into the proposed fees for connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds. The Exchange believes that passing through the fees makes them more transparent to the User, allowing the User to better assess the cost of the connectivity to a Third Party Data Feed by seeing the individual components of the cost, i.e. the Exchange’s fee and the redistribution fee. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable that it does not charge third party markets or content providers for connectivity to their own Third Party Data Feeds, as in the Exchange’s experience such parties generally receive their own feeds for purposes of diagnostics and testing. The Exchange believes that it removes impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, protects investors and the public interest to facilitate such diagnostics and testing. Finally, the Exchange also believes that its fees for VCCs between two Users are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with offering such VCCs while providing Users the benefit of an additional option for connectivity to another User, helping them tailor their data center operations to the requirements of their business operations by allowing them to select the form of connectivity that best suits their needs. As an alternative to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 96059 connect to another User through a cross connect. For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements, terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange. For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,33 the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed services being completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users). The Exchange believes that providing Users with access to Third Party Systems and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds, and DTCC does not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because such Access and Connectivity satisfies User demand for access and connectivity options, and each User has several other access and connectivity options available to it. As alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and products through another User or through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the data center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third party telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the SFTI network, or a combination thereof. Users that opt to use Access or Connectivity would not receive access or connectivity that is not available to all Users, as all market participants that contract with the relevant market or content provider may receive access or connectivity. In this way, the proposed changes would enhance competition by helping Users tailor their Access and Connectivity to the needs of their business operations by allowing them to select the form and latency of access and connectivity that best suits their needs. Similarly, the Exchange believes that providing VCCs between Users does not 33 15 E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 29DEN1 96060 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 250 / Thursday, December 29, 2016 / Notices asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because providing VCCs satisfies User demand for an alternative to cross connects. The Exchange believes that revising the Price List to provide a more detailed description of the Access and Connectivity available to Users would make such descriptions more accessible and transparent, thereby providing market participants with clarity as to what Access and Connectivity is available to them and what the related costs are, thereby enhancing competition by ensuring that all Users have access to the same information regarding Access and Connectivity. Finally, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the trading and other market activities of those market participants who believe that colocation enhances the efficiency of their operations. Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from, such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive fees for colocation services, affected market participants will opt to terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange’s data center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies less dependent upon the lower exchange-toparticipant latency associated with colocation. Accordingly, the exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but also the liquidity of the formerly colocated trading firms, which could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue of the affected exchange. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended by Amendment VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:41 Dec 28, 2016 Jkt 241001 Nos. 1, 2, and 3 is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File No. SR– NYSE–2016–45 on the subject line. Paper Comments SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–79660; File No. SR-Phlx2016–120] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 Thereto, To Permit Phlx To Accept Inbound Options Orders Routed by Nasdaq Execution Services LLC December 22, 2016. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSE–2016–45. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–NYSE– 2016–45, and should be submitted on or before January 19, 2017. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.34 Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–31486 Filed 12–28–16; 8:45 am] Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on December 9, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change. On December 20, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change, which amended and replaced the original filing in its entirety. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to permit Phlx to accept inbound options orders routed by Nasdaq Execution Services LLC (‘‘NES’’) from the International Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘ISE’’) ISE Gemini, LLC (‘‘ISE Gemini’’) and ISE Mercury, LLC (‘‘ISE Mercury’’) (collectively ‘‘ISE Exchanges’’). II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 1 15 34 17 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00105 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2 17 E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 29DEN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 250 (Thursday, December 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 96053-96060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31486]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79674; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-45]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 3 to Proposed Rule Change Amending
the Co-Location Services Offered by the Exchange To Add Certain Access
and Connectivity Fees

December 22, 2016.
On July 29, 2016, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend the co-location services offered by the
Exchange to: (1) Provide additional information regarding the access to
various trading and execution services; connectivity to market data
feeds and testing and certification feeds; connectivity to Third Party
Systems; and connectivity to DTCC provided to Users using data center
local area networks; and (2) establish fees relating to a User's access
to various trading and execution services; connectivity to market data
feeds and testing and certification feeds; connectivity to DTCC; and
other services. The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on August 17, 2016.\3\ The Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on August 16, 2016.\4\
Amendment No. 1

[[Page 96054]]

was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 26,
2016.\5\ The Commission received one comment in response to the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 and the Exchange
responded.\6\ On October 4, 2016, the Commission extended the time
period within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to November 15, 2016.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78556 (August 11,
2016), 81 FR 54877.
\4\ Amendment No. 1 (i) amended the third party data feed MSCI
from 20 Gigabite (``Gb'') to 25 Gb and amended the price from $2,000
to $1,200; (ii) clarified the costs associated with providing a
greater amount of bandwidth for Premium NYSE Data Products for a
particular market as compared to the bandwidth requirements for the
Included Data Products for that same market; (iii) provided further
details on Premium NYSE Data Products, including their composition,
product release dates, and further detail on the reasonableness of
their applicable fees; (iv) added an explanation for the varying fee
differences for the same Gb usage for third party data feeds, DTCC,
and Virtual Control Circuit.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78887 (September
20, 2016), 81 FR 66095.
\6\ See letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from
John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy Officer, Investors Exchange LLC
(IEX), dated September 9, 2016.
On September 23, 2016, the NYSE submitted a response to the IEX
letter.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78966 (September
28, 2016), 81 FR 68475.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On November 2, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.\8\ On November 21, 2016, the Commission
instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2.\9\ In
response to the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission received
additional comment letters regarding the proposed rule change.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ Amendment No. 2 is available on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-4.pdf.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release 34-79316 (November 15,
2016), 81 FR 83303.
\10\ See letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Adam C.
Cooper, Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer, Citadel
Securities, dated December 12, 2016; letter to Brent J. Fields,
Commission, from Melissa MacGregor, Managing Director and Associate
General Counsel, SIFMA, dated December 12, 2016; letter to Brent J.
Fields, Commission, from Joe Wald, Chief Executive Officer,
Clearpool Group, dated December 16, 2016; letter to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, from John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy
Officer, Investors Exchange LLC (IEX), dated December 21, 2016. All
comments received by the Commission on the proposed rule change are
available on the Commission's Web site at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645.shtml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On December 9, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule
change from interested persons.

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Amendment

The Exchange proposes to amend the co-location services offered by
the Exchange to establish fees relating to Users' access to third party
trading and execution services; connectivity to third party data feeds
and testing and certification feeds; access to clearing; and other
services. In addition, this proposed rule change reflects changes to
the Exchange's Price List related to these co-location services. This
Amendment No. 3 supersedes the original filing and Amendments 1 and 2
in their entirety.\11\ The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') has
issued an order instituting proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by
amendments 1 and 2. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79316
(November 15, 2016), 81 FR 83303 (November 21, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-
45) (the ``November 15 Order''). In its filing, as amended by
amendments 1 and 2, the Exchange proposed adding to the Price List
(a) a more detailed description of the connectivity to certain
market data products (the ``Included Data Products'') that Users
receive with connections to the local area networks available in the
data center; and (b) connectivity fees for connecting to other
market data products of the Exchange and its affiliates, NYSE MKT
LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Premium NYSE Data Products''). In the
November 15 Order, the Commission cites language from the proposed
rule change:
the Exchange also stated that the expectation of co-location was
that normally Users would expect reduced latencies in . . .
receiving market data from the Exchange by being colocated.
Therefore, as the Exchange states in Amendment No. 2, both Included
Data Products and Premium NYSE Data Products are `directly related
to the purpose of co-location.'
Id., at 83307. It goes on to say that, if Included Data Products
and Premium NYSE Data Products are ``integral to co-located Users
for trading on the Exchange,'' it was questionable whether obtaining
the information from another source is a viable alternative. Id. The
Exchange disagrees with the Commission's description of Included
Data Products and Premium NYSE Data Products as ``integral'' to
Users for trading on the Exchange. Being related to the purpose of
co-location is not the same as being integral for trading. A User is
not required to receive either Included Data Products or Premium
NYSE Data Products in order to trade on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the co-location \12\ services
offered by the Exchange to establish fees relating to Users' \13\
access to third party trading and execution services; connectivity to
third party data feeds and testing and certification feeds; access to
clearing; and other services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\12\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its
co-location services with the Commission in 2010. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62960 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59310
(September 27, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-56) (the ``Original Co-location
Filing''). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New Jersey
(the ``data center'') from which it provides co-location services to
Users.
\13\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76008 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60190
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-40). As specified in the Price List,
a User that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location
service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-location fees
for the same co-location service charged by the Exchange's
affiliates NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'') and NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE
Arca'' and, together with NYSE MKT, the ``Affiliate SROs''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70206 (August 15, 2013), 78 FR
51765 (August 21, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

More specifically, the Exchange proposes to revise the Price List
to include:
a. Fees for connectivity to:
The execution systems of third party markets and other
content service providers (``Third Party Systems'');
data feeds from third party markets and other content
service providers (the ``Third Party Data Feeds'');
third party testing and certification feeds;
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (``DTCC'')
services; and
b. fees for virtual control circuits (``VCCs'') between two Users.
VCCs are unicast connections between two participants over dedicated
bandwidth.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\14\ Information flows over existing network connections in two
formats: ``unicast'' format, which is a format that allows one-to-
one communication, similar to a phone line, in which information is
sent to and from the Exchange; and ``multicast'' format, which is a
format in which information is sent one-way from the Exchange to
multiple recipients at once, like a radio broadcast.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange provides access to the Third Party Systems
(``Access'') and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party
testing and certification feeds, and DTCC (collectively,
``Connectivity'') as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or
Connectivity is completely voluntary, and several other

[[Page 96055]]

access and connectivity options are available to a User. As
alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the
Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and products
through another User or through a connection to an Exchange access
center outside the data center, third party access center, or third
party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third party
telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the
Exchange's Secure Financial Transaction Infrastructure (``SFTI'')
network, or a combination thereof.
Similarly, the Exchange provides VCCs as a convenience to Users.
Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an alternative to an Exchange-
provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through a fiber
connection (``cross connect'').\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\15\ See Original Co-location Filing, supra note 5, at 59311 and
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74222 (February 6, 2015), 80 FR
7888 (February 12, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-05) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to include IP
network connections and fiber cross connects between a User's
cabinet and non-User's equipment as co-location services) (the ``IP
Network Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Connectivity
Connectivity to Third Party Systems
The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to provide that
Users may obtain connectivity to Third Party Systems of multiple third
party markets and other content service providers for a fee. Users
connect to Third Party Systems over the internet protocol (``IP'')
network, a local area network available in the data center.\16\ The
Exchange selects what connectivity to Third Party Systems to offer in
the data center based on User demand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\16\ See id., at 7889.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to obtain access to a Third Party System, a User enters
into an agreement with the relevant third party content service
provider, pursuant to which the third party content service provider
charges the User for access to the Third Party System. The Exchange
then establishes a unicast connection between the User and the relevant
third party content service provider over the IP network. The Exchange
charges the User for the connectivity to the Third Party System. A User
only receives, and is only charged for, access to Third Party Systems
for which it enters into agreements with the third party content
service provider.
With the exception of the Intercontinental Exchange (``ICE'')
feed,\17\ the Exchange has no ownership interest in the Third Party
Systems. Establishing a User's access to a Third Party System does not
give the Exchange any right to use the Third Party Systems.
Connectivity to a Third Party System does not provide access or order
entry to the Exchange's execution system, and a User's connection to a
Third Party System is not through the Exchange's execution system.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\17\ ICE is owned by the Exchange's ultimate parent,
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., and so the Exchange has an indirect
interest in the ICE feeds. The ICE feeds include both market data
and trading and clearing services, but the Exchange includes it as a
Third Party Data Feed. In order for a User to receive an ICE feed,
ICE must provide authorization for the User to receive both data and
trading and clearing services.
\18\ The Exchange has a dedicated network connection to each of
the Third Party Systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange charges a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to a
Third Party System. Specifically, when a User requests access to a
Third Party System, it identifies the applicable third party market or
other content service provider and what bandwidth connection it
requires.
The monthly recurring fee the Exchange charges Users for unicast
connectivity to each Third Party System varies by the bandwidth of the
connection, as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly
recurring fee
Bandwidth of connection to third party system per connection
to third party
system
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Mb.................................................... $200
3 Mb.................................................... 400
5 Mb.................................................... 500
10 Mb................................................... 800
25 Mb................................................... 1,200
50 Mb................................................... 1,800
100 Mb.................................................. 2,500
200 Mb.................................................. 3,000
1 Gb.................................................... 3,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange provides connectivity to the following Third Party
Systems:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Americas Trading Group (ATG)
BATS
Boston Options Exchange (BOX)
Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE)
Credit Suisse
International Securities Exchange (ISE)
Nasdaq
National Stock Exchange
NYFIX Marketplace
------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the connectivity fees, the Exchange proposes to add
language to its Price List stating the following:

Pricing for access to the execution systems of third party markets
and other service providers (Third Party Systems) is for
connectivity only. Connectivity to Third Party Systems is subject to
any technical provisioning requirements and authorization from the
provider of the data feed. Connectivity to Third Party Systems is
over the IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently
by the relevant third party content service provider. The Exchange
is not the exclusive method to connect to Third Party Systems.
Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds
The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to provide that
Users may obtain connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds for a fee. The
Exchange receives Third Party Data Feeds from multiple national
securities exchanges and other content service providers at its data
center. It then provides connectivity to that data to Users for a fee.
With the exceptions of Global OTC and NYSE Global Index, Users connect
to Third Party Data Feeds over the IP network.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\19\ See IP Network Release, supra note 8, at 7889 (``The IP
network also provides Users with access to away market data
products.''). Users can connect to Global OTC and NYSE Global Index
over the IP network or the Liquidity Center Network (``LCN''), a
local area network available in the data center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange notes that charging Users a monthly fee for
connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds is consistent with the monthly
fee Nasdaq charges its co-location customers for connectivity to third
party data. For instance, Nasdaq charges its co-location customers
monthly fees of $1,500 and $4,000 for connectivity to BATS Y and BATS,
respectively, and of $2,500 for connectivity to EDGA or EDGX.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\20\ See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to connect to a Third Party Data Feed, a User enters into
a contract with the relevant third party market or other content
service provider, pursuant to which the content service provider
charges the User for the Third Party Data Feed. The Exchange receives
the Third Party Data Feed over its fiber optic network and, after the
data provider and User enter into the contract and the Exchange
receives authorization from the data provider, the Exchange re-
transmits the data to the User over the User's port. The Exchange
charges the User for the connectivity to the Third Party Data Feed. A
User only receives, and is only charged for, connectivity to the Third
Party Data Feeds for which it enters into contracts.
With the exception of the ICE, Global OTC and NYSE Global Index
feeds,\21\

[[Page 96056]]

the Exchange has no affiliation with the sellers of the Third Party
Data Feeds. It has no right to use the Third Party Data Feeds other
than as a redistributor of the data. The Third Party Data Feeds do not
provide access or order entry to the Exchange's execution system. With
the exception of the ICE feeds, the Third Party Data Feeds do not
provide access or order entry to the execution systems of the third
party generating the feed.\22\ The Exchange receives Third Party Data
Feeds via arms-length agreements and it has no inherent advantage over
any other distributor of such data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\21\ ICE and the Global OTC alternative trading system are both
owned by the Exchange's ultimate parent, Intercontinental Exchange,
Inc., and so the Exchange has an indirect interest in the ICE and
Global OTC feeds. The NYSE Global Index feed includes index and
exchange traded product valuations data, with data drawn from the
Exchange, the Affiliate SROs, and third party exchanges. Because it
includes third party data, the NYSE Global Index feed is considered
a Third Party Data Feed. As with all Third Party Data Feeds, the
Exchange is not the exclusive method to connect to the ICE, Global
OTC or NYSE Global Index feeds.
\22\ Unlike other Third Party Data Feeds, the ICE feeds include
both market data and trading and clearing services. In order to
receive the ICE feeds, a User must receive authorization from ICE to
receive both market data and trading and clearing services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange charges a monthly recurring fee for connectivity to
each Third Party Data Feed. The monthly recurring fee is per Third
Party Data Feed, with the exception that the monthly recurring feed for
SuperFeed and MSCI varies by the bandwidth of the connection. Depending
on its needs and bandwidth, a User may opt to receive all or some of
the feeds or services included in a Third Party Data Feed.
The following table shows the feeds that connectivity to each Third
Party Data Feed provides, together with the applicable monthly
recurring fee.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monthly
recurring
connectivity
Third party data feed fee per third
party data
feed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bats BZX Exchange (BZX) and Bats BYX Exchange (BYX)..... $2,000
Bats EDGX Exchange (EDGX) and Bats EDGA Exchange (EDGA). 2,000
Boston Options Exchange (BOX)........................... 1,000
Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE)................... 2,000
Chicago Stock Exchange (CHX)............................ 400
Euronext................................................ 600
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA)......... 500
Global OTC.............................................. 100
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)......................... 1,500
Montr[eacute]al Exchange (MX)........................... 1,000
MSCI 5 Mb............................................... 500
MSCI 25 Mb.............................................. 1,200
NASDAQ Stock Market..................................... 2,000
NASDAQ OMX Global Index Data Service.................... 100
NASDAQ OMDF............................................. 100
NASDAQ UQDF & UTDF...................................... 500
NYSE Global Index....................................... 100
OTC Markets Group....................................... 1,000
SR Labs--SuperFeed <=500 Mb............................. 250
SR Labs--SuperFeed >500 Mb to <=1.25 Gb................. 800
SR Labs--SuperFeed >1.25 Gb............................. 1,000
TMX Group............................................... 2,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to the above connectivity fees, the Exchange proposes
to add the following language to its Price List:

Pricing for data feeds from third party markets and other content
service providers (Third Party Data Feeds) is for connectivity only.
Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds is subject to any technical
provisioning requirements and authorization from the provider of the
data feed. Connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds is over the IP
network, with the exception that Users can connect to Global OTC and
NYSE Global Index over the IP network or LCN. Market data fees are
charged independently by the relevant third party market or content
service provider. The Exchange is not the exclusive method to
connect to Third Party Data Feeds.

Third Party Data Feed providers may charge redistribution fees,
such as Nasdaq's Extranet Access Fees and OTC Markets Group's Access
Fees.\23\ When the Exchange receives a redistribution fee, it passes
through the charge to the User, without change to the fee. The fee is
labeled as a pass-through of a redistribution fee on the User's
invoice. The Exchange proposes to add language to the Price List
accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\23\ See NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Rule 7025, ``Extranet Access
Fee'', and OTC Markets Market Data Distribution Agreement Appendix
B, ``Fees'' at https://www.otcmarkets.com/content/doc/market-data-fees-2016.pdf. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74040
(January 13, 2015), 80 FR 2460 (January 16, 2015) (SR-NASDAQ-2015-
003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange provides third party markets or content providers that
are also Users connectivity to their own Third Party Data Feeds. The
Exchange does not charge Users that are third party markets or content
providers for connectivity to their own feeds, as in the Exchange's
experience such parties generally receive their own feeds for purposes
of diagnostics and testing. The Exchange proposes to add language to
the Price List accordingly.
Connectivity to Third Party Testing and Certification Feeds
The Exchange offers Users connectivity to third party certification
and testing feeds. Certification feeds are used to certify that a User
conforms to any of the relevant content service provider's requirements
for accessing Third Party Systems or receiving Third Party Data, while
testing feeds provide Users an environment in which to conduct tests
with non-live data.\24\ Such feeds, which are solely used for
certification and testing and do not carry live production data, are
available over the IP network.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\24\ For example, a User that trades on a third party exchange
may wish to test the exchange's upcoming releases and product
releases or may wish to test a new algorithm in a testing
environment prior to making it live.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to include
connectivity to third party certification and testing feeds. The
Exchange charges a connectivity fee of $100 per month per feed.
The Exchange proposes to add the following connectivity fees and
language to its Price List:

Connectivity to third party certification and testing feeds--$100
monthly recurring fee per feed.

The Exchange provides connectivity to third party testing and
certification feeds provided by third party markets and other content
service providers. Pricing for third party testing and certification
feeds is for connectivity only. Connectivity to third party testing and
certification feeds is subject to any technical provisioning
requirements and authorization from the provider of the data feed.
Connectivity to third party testing and certification feeds is over the
IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently by the
relevant third party market or content service provider. The Exchange
is not the exclusive method to connect to third party testing and
certification feeds.
Connectivity to DTCC
The Exchange provides Users connectivity to DTCC for clearing, fund
transfer, insurance, and settlement services.\25\ The Exchange proposes
to revise the Price List to include connectivity to DTCC. The Exchange
charges a connectivity fee of $500 per month for connections to DTCC of
5 Mb and $2,500 for connections of 50 Mb. Connectivity to DTCC is
available over the IP network.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\25\ Such connectivity to DTCC is distinct from the access to
shared data services for clearing and settlement services that a
User receives when it purchases access to the LCN or IP network. The
shared data services allow Users and other entities with access to
the Trading Systems to post files for settlement and clearing
services to access.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In order to connect to DTCC, a User enters into a contract with
DTCC, pursuant to which DTCC charges the User for the services
provided. The Exchange receives the DTCC feed over

[[Page 96057]]

its fiber optic network and, after DTCC and the User enter into the
services contract and the Exchange receives authorization from DTCC,
the Exchange provides connectivity to DTCC to the User over the User's
IP network port. The Exchange charges the User for the connectivity to
DTCC.
Connectivity to DTCC does not provide access or order entry to the
Exchange's execution system, and a User's connection to DTCC is not
through the Exchange's execution system.
The Exchange proposes to add the following connectivity fees and
language to its Price List:

5 Mb connection to DTCC--$500 monthly recurring fee.
50 Mb connection to DTCC--$2,500 monthly recurring fee.

Pricing for connectivity to DTCC feeds is for connectivity only.
Connectivity to DTCC feeds is subject to any technical provisioning
requirements and authorization from DTCC. Connectivity to DTCC feeds is
over the IP network. Any applicable fees are charged independently by
DTCC. The Exchange is not the exclusive method to connect to DTCC
feeds.
Virtual Control Circuits
Finally, the Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to offer
VCCs between two Users. VCCs are connections between two points over
dedicated bandwidth using the IP network. A VCC (previously called a
``peer to peer'' connection) is a two-way connection which the two
participants can use for any purpose.
The Exchange bills the User requesting the VCC, but will not set up
a VCC until the other User confirms that it wishes to have the VCC set
up.
The Exchange proposes to revise the Price List to include VCCs
between two Users. The fee for VCCs is based on the bandwidth utilized,
as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of Service Description Amount of Charge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtual Control Circuit 1 Mb............. $200 monthly charge.
between two Users.
3 Mb............. 400 monthly charge.
5 Mb............. 500 monthly charge.
10 Mb............ 800 monthly charge.
25 Mb............ 1,200 monthly charge.
50 Mb............ 1,800 monthly charge.
100 Mb........... 2,500 monthly charge.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

General
As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i)
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of
the co-location services proposed herein would be completely voluntary
and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; \26\ and
(iii) a User would only incur one charge for the particular co-location
service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only
to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or both the Affiliate
SROs.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\26\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from,
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
\27\ See SR-NYSE-2013-59, supra note 6 at 51766. The Affiliate
SROs have also submitted substantially the same proposed rule change
to propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSEMKT-2016-63 and
SR-NYSEArca-2016-89.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\28\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\29\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange believes that the proposed changes remove impediments
to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a
national market system and, in general, protect investors and the
public interest because, by offering Access and Connectivity, the
Exchange gives each User additional options for addressing its access
and connectivity needs, responding to User demand for access and
connectivity options. Providing Access and Connectivity helps each User
tailor its data center operations to the requirements of its business
operations by allowing it to select the form and latency of access and
connectivity that best suits its needs. The Exchange provides Access
and Connectivity as conveniences to Users. Use of Access or
Connectivity is completely voluntary, and each User has several other
access and connectivity options available to it. As alternatives to
using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User may
access or connect to such services and products through another User or
through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the data
center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User may
make such connection through a third party telecommunication provider,
third party wireless network, the SFTI network, or a combination
thereof.
The Exchange believes that providing access to Third Party Systems
and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and
certification feeds and DTCC, as well as revising the Price List to
describe such services, would remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, protect investors and the public interest because the
proposed changes would make the descriptions of market participants'
access and connectivity options and the related fees more accessible
and

[[Page 96058]]

transparent, thereby providing market participants with clarity as to
what options for connectivity are available to them and what the
related costs are. Including a description of the access to Third Party
Systems and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds that Users receive
is consistent with Nasdaq's Rule 7034, which includes similar
information.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\30\ See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034--Market Data Connectivity
(``Pricing is for connectivity only and is similar to connectivity
fees imposed by other vendors. The fees are generally based on the
amount of bandwidth needed to accommodate a particular feed and
Nasdaq is not the exclusive method to get market data connectivity.
Market data fees are charged independently by the Nasdaq Stock
Market and other exchanges.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the Exchange believes that providing connectivity to
third party testing and certification feeds removes impediments to, and
perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, protects investors and the public
interest because such feeds provide Users an environment in which to
conduct tests with non-live data, including testing for upcoming
releases and product enhancements or the User's own software
development, and allow Users to certify conformance to any applicable
technical requirements. Similarly, the Exchange believes that providing
connectivity to DTCC removes impediments to, and perfects the
mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, protects investors and the public interest because it
provides efficient connection to clearing, fund transfer, insurance,
and settlement services.
The Exchange believes that providing Users with VCCs removes
impediments to, and perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system because VCCs provide each User with an
additional option for connectivity to another User, helping it tailor
its data center operations to the requirements of its business
operations by allowing it to select the form of connectivity that best
suits its needs. The Exchange provides VCCs as a convenience to Users.
Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an alternative to an Exchange-
provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through a cross
connect.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\31\ in particular, because
it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange believes that the proposed fees changes are consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act for multiple reasons. The Exchange
operates in a highly competitive market in which exchanges offer co-
location services as a means to facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants who believe that co-location
enhances the efficiency of their operations. Accordingly, fees charged
for co-location services are constrained by the active competition for
the order flow of, and other business from, such market participants.
If a particular exchange charges excessive fees for co-location
services, affected market participants will opt to terminate their co-
location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt a possible range of
alternative strategies, including placing their servers in a physically
proximate location outside the exchange's data center (which could be a
competing exchange), or pursuing strategies less dependent upon the
lower exchange-to-participant latency associated with co-location.
Accordingly, the exchange charging excessive fees would stand to lose
not only co-location revenues but also the liquidity of the formerly
co-located trading firms, which could have additional follow-on effects
on the market share and revenue of the affected exchange.
The Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein
are equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because, in
addition to the services being completely voluntary, they are available
to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the same products and services
are available to all Users). All Users that voluntarily select to
receive access to Third Party Systems, connectivity to Third Party Data
Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds and DTCC, or a VCC
between Users, would be charged the same amount for the same services.
The Exchange believes that the services and fees proposed herein
are reasonable, equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory
because the Exchange provides Access and Connectivity as conveniences
to Users. Use of Access or Connectivity is completely voluntary, and
each User has several other access and connectivity options available
to it. As alternatives to using the Access and Connectivity provided by
the Exchange, a User may access or connect to such services and
products through another User or through a connection to an Exchange
access center outside the data center, third party access center, or
third party vendor. The User may make such connection through a third
party telecommunication provider, third party wireless network, the
SFTI network, or a combination thereof. Users that opt to use Access or
Connectivity would not receive access or connectivity that is not
available to all Users, as all market participants that contract with
the relevant market or content provider may receive access or
connectivity. Similarly, the Exchange provides VCCs between Users as a
convenience to Users. Use of a VCC is completely voluntary. As an
alternative to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may connect to another
User through a cross connect.
The Exchange believes that the proposed charges are reasonable,
equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory because the
Exchange offers Access, Connectivity, and VCCs as conveniences to
Users, but in order to do so must provide, maintain and operate the
data center facility hardware and technology infrastructure. The
Exchange must handle the installation, administration, monitoring,
support and maintenance of such services, including by responding to
any production issues. Since the inception of co-location, the Exchange
has made numerous improvements to the network hardware and technology
infrastructure and has established additional administrative controls.
The Exchange has expanded the network infrastructure to keep pace with
the increased number of services available to Users, including the
increasing bandwidth required for Access and Connectivity, including
resilient and redundant feeds. In addition, in order to provide
connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, Third Party Systems, third
party testing and certification feeds and DTCC, the Exchange must
maintain multiple connections to each Third Party Data Feed, Third
Party System, and DTCC, allowing the Exchange to provide resilient and
redundant connections; adapt to any changes made by the relevant third
party; and cover any applicable fees (other than redistribution fees)
charged by the relevant third party, such as port fees.
The Exchange believes that charging separate connectivity fees for
Third Party Data Feeds and access to Third Party Systems, third party
testing and certification feeds and connectivity to DTCC is reasonable
and not unfairly discriminatory because, in the Exchange's experience,
not all Users connect to Third Party Data Feeds, Third Party Systems,
third party testing and certification feeds or DTCC. By

[[Page 96059]]

charging only those Users that receive such connectivity, only the
Users that directly benefit from it support its cost. In addition,
Users are not required to use any of their bandwidth to connect to
Third Party Data Feeds, third party testing and certification feeds or
DTCC, or to access Third Party Systems, unless they wish to do so.
The Exchange believes the fees for connectivity to Third Party Data
Feeds are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover
the costs associated with offering Users connectivity to Third Party
Data Feeds while providing Users the convenience of receiving such
Third Party Data Feeds within co-location, helping them tailor their
data center operations to the requirements of their business operations
by allowing them to select the form and latency of connectivity that
best suits their needs. The Exchange believes that its proposed charges
for connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds are similar to the
connectivity fees Nasdaq imposes on its co-location customers. For
instance, Nasdaq charges its co-location customers monthly fees of
$1,500 and $4,000 for connectivity to BATS Y and BATS, respectively,
and of $2,500 for connectivity to EDGA or EDGX.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\32\ See Nasdaq Stock Market Rule 7034.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange believes that its connectivity fees for access to
Third Party Systems are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to
defray or cover the costs associated with offering such access while
providing Users the convenience of being able to access such Third
Party Systems, helping them tailor their data center operations to the
requirements of their business operations by allowing them to select
the form and latency of connectivity that best suits their needs.
Similarly, the Exchange believes that its fees for connectivity to DTCC
are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or cover the
costs associated with offering such access while providing Users the
benefit of an efficient connection to clearing, fund transfer,
insurance, and settlement services.
The monthly recurring fees the Exchange charges Users for
connectivity to Third Party Systems, the MSCI and SuperFeed Third Party
Data Feeds, and DTCC, as well as for VCCs between Users, vary by the
bandwidth of the connection. The Exchange also believes such fees are
reasonable because the monthly recurring fee varies by the bandwidth of
the connection, and so is generally proportional to the bandwidth
required. The Exchange notes that some of the monthly recurring fees
for connectivity to SuperFeed and DTCC differ from the fees for the
other connections of the same bandwidth. The Exchange believes that
such difference in pricing is reasonable, equitably allocated and not
unfairly discriminatory because, although the bandwidth may be the
same, the competitive considerations and the costs the Exchange incurs
in providing such connections and VCCs may differ.
The Exchange also believes that its connectivity fees for access to
third party testing and certification feeds are reasonable because they
allow the Exchange to defray or cover the costs associated with
offering such access while providing Users the benefit of having an
environment in which to conduct tests with non-live data, including
testing for upcoming releases and product enhancements or the User's
own software development, and to certify conformance to any applicable
technical requirements.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable that redistribution fees
charged by providers of Third Party Data Feeds are passed through to
the User, without change to the fee. If not passed through, the cost of
the re-distribution fees would be factored into the proposed fees for
connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds. The Exchange believes that
passing through the fees makes them more transparent to the User,
allowing the User to better assess the cost of the connectivity to a
Third Party Data Feed by seeing the individual components of the cost,
i.e. the Exchange's fee and the redistribution fee.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable that it does not charge
third party markets or content providers for connectivity to their own
Third Party Data Feeds, as in the Exchange's experience such parties
generally receive their own feeds for purposes of diagnostics and
testing. The Exchange believes that it removes impediments to, and
perfects the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national
market system and, in general, protects investors and the public
interest to facilitate such diagnostics and testing.
Finally, the Exchange also believes that its fees for VCCs between
two Users are reasonable because they allow the Exchange to defray or
cover the costs associated with offering such VCCs while providing
Users the benefit of an additional option for connectivity to another
User, helping them tailor their data center operations to the
requirements of their business operations by allowing them to select
the form of connectivity that best suits their needs. As an alternative
to an Exchange-provided VCC, a User may connect to another User through
a cross connect.
For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\33\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed services being
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange believes that providing Users with access to Third
Party Systems and connectivity to Third Party Data Feeds, third party
testing and certification feeds, and DTCC does not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because such Access and Connectivity satisfies User
demand for access and connectivity options, and each User has several
other access and connectivity options available to it. As alternatives
to using the Access and Connectivity provided by the Exchange, a User
may access or connect to such services and products through another
User or through a connection to an Exchange access center outside the
data center, third party access center, or third party vendor. The User
may make such connection through a third party telecommunication
provider, third party wireless network, the SFTI network, or a
combination thereof. Users that opt to use Access or Connectivity would
not receive access or connectivity that is not available to all Users,
as all market participants that contract with the relevant market or
content provider may receive access or connectivity. In this way, the
proposed changes would enhance competition by helping Users tailor
their Access and Connectivity to the needs of their business operations
by allowing them to select the form and latency of access and
connectivity that best suits their needs.
Similarly, the Exchange believes that providing VCCs between Users
does not

[[Page 96060]]

impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because providing VCCs
satisfies User demand for an alternative to cross connects.
The Exchange believes that revising the Price List to provide a
more detailed description of the Access and Connectivity available to
Users would make such descriptions more accessible and transparent,
thereby providing market participants with clarity as to what Access
and Connectivity is available to them and what the related costs are,
thereby enhancing competition by ensuring that all Users have access to
the same information regarding Access and Connectivity.
Finally, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in
which exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the
trading and other market activities of those market participants who
believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by
the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from,
such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive
fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to
terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt
a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data
center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies
less dependent upon the lower exchange-to-participant latency
associated with co-location. Accordingly, the exchange charging
excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly co-located trading firms, which
could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue
of the affected exchange. For the reasons described above, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change reflects this competitive
environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended by Amendment Nos. 1, 2, and 3 is consistent with the
Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following
methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-NYSE-2016-45 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2016-45. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2016-45, and should be
submitted on or before January 19, 2017.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-31486 Filed 12-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.