Applications for New Awards; Teacher and School Leader Incentive Program, 92793-92805 [2016-30643]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
revocable, nonassignable, exclusive
license to practice worldwide the
Government owned inventions
described in U.S. Provisional Patent
Application 62/267,969, filed 16
December 2015 and entitled ‘‘Device For
Noninvasively Verifying Time
Temperature Profile Of A
Thermoluminescent Dosimeter Card
Reader’’ as well as any issued patent,
divisional or continuation from that and
related foreign filings in the field of
dosimetry and radiation protection.
DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the
grant of this license has fifteen (15) days
from the date of this notice to file
written objections along with
supporting evidence, if any, not later
than January 4, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be
filed with Attn: Naval Medical Research
Center, Code 1URO/OPBD, 503 Robert
Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD
20910–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
T.A. Ponzio, Director, Partnerships &
Business Development, Naval Medical
Research Center, 503 Robert Grant Ave.,
Silver Spring, MD 20910–7500;
todd.a.ponzio.civ@mail.mil; telephone:
240–762–0673.
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.
Dated: December 13, 2016.
A.M. Nichols,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–30585 Filed 12–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Teacher
and School Leader Incentive Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Overview Information
Teacher and School Leader Incentive
Program (TSL) Notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal
year (FY) 2017.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.374A.
DATES:
Applications Available: December 20,
2016.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
February 4, 2017.
Dates of Pre-Application Workshops:
For information about pre-application
workshops, visit the TSL Web site at:
https://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/
teacher-quality/teacher-incentive-fund/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 24, 2017.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: April 23, 2017.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
TSL is to assist States, local educational
agencies (LEAs), and nonprofit
organizations to develop, implement,
improve, or expand comprehensive
performance-based compensation
systems or human capital management
systems for teachers, principals, and
other school leaders (especially for
teachers, principals, and other school
leaders in high-need schools) who raise
student academic achievement and
close the achievement gap between
high- and low-performing students. In
addition, a portion of TSL funds are
dedicated to study the effectiveness,
fairness, quality, consistency, and
reliability of performance-based
compensation systems or human capital
management systems for teachers,
principals, and other school leaders.
Background:
The Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as
reauthorized on December 10, 2015, by
the Every Student Succeeds Act
(ESSA),1 established the Teacher and
School Leader Incentive Fund (TSL)
program. TSL builds on the former
Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) program
and promotes Performance-Based
Compensation Systems (PBCSs) 2 and
comprehensive Human Capital
Management Systems (HCMSs) that
support teachers, principals, and other
school leaders (i.e., Educators as used in
this notice). In recognition of the
importance that effective school
leadership has on student achievement,
TSL also promotes comprehensive
Evaluation and Support Systems for all
Educators within an LEA, especially
those serving in high-need schools. In
addition, TSL seeks to contribute to the
body of knowledge regarding impactful
approaches to enhancing Educator
effectiveness by promoting the study of
the efficacy, fairness, quality,
consistency, and reliability of these
systems to support Educators through
an independent, Department-led
evaluation to assess the program’s
effectiveness and relevant lessons
learned. Further, the Department seeks
to ensure that the design of the TSL
competition reflects the new provisions
1 Unless otherwise noted, references in this notice
to sections of the ESEA as reauthorized by ESSA are
identified as sections of the ESEA.
2 Throughout this notice, all defined terms are
denoted with capitals.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92793
of the TSL statute in ESEA sections
2211–2213, as well as the lessons
learned from 10 years of implementing
the TIF program.
Results from the TIF program have
varied across and within the portfolio of
five cohorts of TIF grantees, comprised
of over 140 grantees that received a total
of about $2 billion in grant awards.
Successful TIF grantees implemented
comprehensive efforts to help teachers
and principals learn and grow
throughout their professional
trajectories. Successful TIF grantees also
considered recruitment, induction,
support and career development, and
growth and leadership opportunities
aligned with the LEA’s overall
improvement strategy; and they used
multi-measure evaluation systems to
inform the development of innovative
incentives and structures that support
teachers’ and principals’ growth and
advancement. LEAs also used TIF funds
to develop their cadre of leaders.
With the priorities, requirements,
definitions, and selection criterion used
for this competition, we seek to build on
the efforts of the TIF program and
abundant research over two decades
showing that teachers and teacher
effectiveness are the most critical inschool factors in improving student
outcomes.3
In addition, we have learned that
effective principals and other School
Leaders are crucial to strengthening
teaching and school communities, and
play a critical role in students’ academic
success—especially in high-need
schools—by creating cultures of high
expectations.4 Indeed, teachers cite a
principal’s support and effectiveness as
a leading factor that contributes to their
decision to remain in the profession.5
Effective School Leaders directly impact
the quality of instruction through hiring
decisions of school personnel that
provide instructional leadership,
support, and develop teachers—which,
in turn, can help teachers focus their
3 Aaronson, Daniel, Barrow, Lisa, & Sander,
William, ‘‘Teachers and Student Achievement in
the Chicago Public High Schools.’’ (2007), Journal
of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135; Rivkin, Steven,
Hanushek, Eric & Kain, John, ‘‘Teachers, Schools,
and Academic Achievement.’’ (2005),
Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
4 ‘‘Impact Evaluation of Support for Principals,’’
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/tq_
principals.asp (2014); Leithwood, Kenneth, et al.,
‘‘How Leadership Influences Student Learning:
Review of Research’’ (2004) New York: The Wallace
Foundation, available at https://
www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/
Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-StudentLearning.pdf.
5 Ingersoll, Richard. ‘‘Teacher Turnover, Teacher
Shortages, and the Organization of Schools.’’
University of Washington. (2001).
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
92794
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
efforts on student learning.6 Effective
School Leaders also create a vision of
academic success for all children in
their schools and encourage other
Educators to take on leadership roles
and responsibilities.
Given the importance of ensuring that
Educators are as effective as possible—
especially in high-need schools, where
equal educational opportunity is
particularly important for historically
underserved students—TSL is designed
to utilize PBCSs and other supports for
Educators as a central part of an LEA’s
effort to improve student academic
achievement. Indeed, the TSL statute
gives priority to applicants that propose
to focus supports on Educators in HighNeed Schools. By providing Educators
with PBCSs, in which performancebased compensation may include robust
career ladder opportunities for effective
Educators, TSL aims to reward
Educators for their effectiveness and
improved student outcomes.
Recent cohorts of TIF grantees
expanded LEA teacher and principal
evaluation systems to include all
teachers and principals in a given LEA,
and measured educator performance
using multiple factors, including
classroom observations and gains in
student academic achievement. Using
the information generated from these
more comprehensive teacher and
principal evaluation systems, successful
TIF grantees began to transform how
effective teachers and principals were
compensated, moving beyond the
episodic performance-based bonuses
that were more typical of early TIF
cohorts. Recent cohorts of TIF grantees
also began complementing their
compensation incentives with noncompensation supports in order to build
stronger support systems throughout
teachers’ and principals’ trajectory, from
pre-service through retention. These
strategies included using teacher and
principal evaluation systems to inform
decisions about recruitment, retention,
tenure, compensation, support, and
leadership potential.
Successful TIF grantees also
demonstrated that implementing
6 Papa, Frank, Hamilton Lankford, and James
Wyckoff, ‘‘Hiring Teachers in New York’s Public
Schools: Can the Principal Make a Difference?’’
University (2008) available at Albany, SUNY.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/
15700760701655524?mobileUi=0&; Wallace
Foundation, ‘‘The School Principal as Leader:
Guiding Schools to Better Teaching and Learning’’
(2013 available at www.wallacefoundation.org/
knowledge-center/Documents/The-SchoolPrincipal-as-Leader-Guiding-Schools-to-BetterTeaching-and-Learning-2nd-Ed.pdf; Ikemoto, Gina,
et al., New Leaders, ‘‘Playmakers: How great
principals build and lead great teams of
teachers’’(2012) available at www.newleaders.org/
wp-content/uploads/Playmakers.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
successful Educator Evaluation and
Support Systems that inform
performance-based compensation can
occur across a wide range of contexts.
However, based on reports from
grantees and from evaluations of early
TIF cohorts, the most promising TIFsupported efforts appear to be those that
are designed to support instructional
improvements through use of classroom
and school-level data, to create a shared
understanding of effective classroomlevel practices.
In recent years, many States and LEAs
have developed high-quality Educator
Evaluation and Support systems as part
of their efforts to improve LEAs’ hiring
practices, provide Educators with
meaningful feedback and targeted
professional development, and use
information on Educator performance to
inform key school- and district-level
decisions. As such, an increasing
number of LEAs are well-equipped to
make human capital decisions that both
support Educators and improve student
outcomes. In view of the work and
resources that many LEAs have already
invested in an HCMS, PBCS, and
Educator Evaluation and Support
Systems that already meet provisions of
the TSL statute, and the desire to have
make awards to applicants who are
ready to expand upon their existing
work, we have structured this
competition to permit LEAs to build
upon and improve existing HCMS,
PBCS, and Educator Evaluation and
Support Systems that meet the
definitions of these terms in this notice
that come from the TSL statute. Doing
so could include efforts to improve the
Educator Evaluation and Support
Systems (e.g., make them even more
fair, reliable, and credible; better align
formative and summative assessments
with college- and career-ready
standards; or provide more mentoring
and coaching to support Educators) as
well as efforts to have the HCMS and
Educator Evaluation and Support
Systems address new challenges or
opportunities (e.g., partnering with
institutions of higher education to
strengthen pre-service programming or
creating a teacher residency program,
including one that is consistent with the
definition of the term in section 2002(5)
of the ESEA.) The Department
encourages applicants to reflect these
types of efforts in their TSL
applications.
Moreover, much work remains to
ensure that students, particularly those
whose families live in poverty, have
equitable access to the most effective
Educators. In order to help ensure that
every public school student has
equitable access to excellent Educators,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in 2014 the Department asked each State
educational agency (SEA) to submit a
State Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to
Excellent Educators describing how it
will ensure that ‘‘poor and minority
children are not taught at higher rates
than other children by inexperienced,
unqualified, or out-of-field teachers,’’ as
formerly required by section
1111(b)(8)(C) of the ESEA, as
reauthorized by the No Child Left
Behind Act (now section 1111(g)(1)(B)
of the ESEA, as amended by ESSA). All
50 States, the District of Columbia, and
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
developed plans that the Department
approved in 2015. States began to
implement these plans in the 2015–16
school year. Several of the States’
proposed approaches reflected in these
plans include performance-based
compensation, including strategies such
as career pathways that TSL funds could
support. Therefore, the Department
encourages applicants to align their TSL
proposals to their State plans, and has
established a priority for this purpose.
In addition, given the emerging
literature on the importance of educator
diversity, the Department encourages
applicants to leverage TSL resources to
diversify their Educator workforce, and,
similarly, has established a second
priority for this purpose. More
information on the importance of
educator workforce diversity can be
found in the Department’s report on The
State of Racial Diversity in the Educator
Workforce at the following link: https://
www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/
racial-diversity/state-racial-diversityworkforce.pdf.
Historically, the TIF program focused
its efforts on implementing
performance-based compensation in
high-need schools. Under provisions
that include ESEA sections 2211(a) and
(b)(2) and 2212(d)(1), TSL continues to
ensure that grantees focus their
activities on teachers and School
Leaders in high-need schools. In this
regard, ESEA section 2211(b)(2) defines
a High-Need School as a public
elementary or secondary school that is
located in an area in which the
percentage of students from families
with incomes below the poverty line is
30 percent or more. The definition of
poverty line in ESEA section 8101(41)
effectively requires the Department to
use poverty line data gathered by the
U.S. Census Bureau since no other data
that meet this definition are available.
However, the Department has
determined that the school-level
poverty-line data required by the
definition of High-Need School are
unavailable; the U.S. Census Bureau
reports these data only by LEA. As such,
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
in order to ensure that awards made
under this competition still focus on
schools that are high-poverty, the
Secretary is exercising the orderly
transition authority in section 4(b) of
ESSA to define a High-Need School for
purposes of this competition using the
same poverty measure applicable to the
definition of a High-Need School for the
past three TIF competitions. Since the
income of a family below the poverty
line is much lower than the income a
family needs to enable its children to be
eligible for free or reduced-price lunch
subsidies under the Richard B. Russell
National School Lunch Act (the poverty
measure used in all prior TIF
competitions), we believe that use of the
prior TIF poverty measure to determine
which schools are high-need is also a
reasonable approach to implementing
Congressional intent for TSL.
Priorities: This notice contains four
absolute priorities and two competitive
preference priorities. We are
establishing these priorities,
requirements, and definitions for the FY
2017 grant competition, and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priorities: The following
priorities are absolute priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), applications must
meet the following absolute priorities in
order to be considered for awards:
• Absolute Priority 1: Human Capital
Management System; and one of the
three following Absolute Priorities:
• Absolute Priority 2: Evaluation and
Support Systems for Teachers;
• Absolute Priority 3: Evaluation and
Support Systems for School Leaders; or
• Absolute Priority 4: Evaluation and
Support Systems for Teachers and
School Leaders.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Note: Applicants must indicate in their
applications under which absolute priorities
they are applying. Applications that do not
clearly address Absolute Priority 1 and one
of the other absolute priorities (Absolute
Priorities 2, 3, or 4) will not be reviewed.
Assuming that applications in each
funding category are of sufficient
quality, the Secretary intends to award
grants under each of the three following
funding categories:
(a) Evaluation and Support Systems
for Teachers;
(b) Evaluation and Support Systems
for School Leaders; and
(c) Evaluation and Support Systems
for Teachers and School Leaders.
Applications in each funding category
will be peer reviewed, scored based on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
the selection criteria announced in this
notice, and placed in rank order.
Consistent with section 2212(d)(2) of the
ESEA, to the extent practicable, the
Secretary will award an equitable
geographic distribution of grants,
including the distribution of such grants
between rural and urban areas.
The absolute priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Human Capital
Management System (HCMS). To meet
this priority, the applicant must
include, in its application, a description
of its existing LEA-wide HCMS (or, in
the case of a consortium application or
an SEA application, the shared HCMS
that currently exists across the proposed
LEAs that will participate in this
project), including a description of its
PBCS. In addition, the application must
describe—
(1) How the HCMS currently includes
an Evaluation and Support System for
teachers, School Leaders, or both, that
reflects clear and fair measures of
performance, based in part on
demonstrated improvement in student
academic achievement;
(2) Any proposed modifications of the
HCMS under the proposed project,
including modifications that expand or
improve the Evaluation and Support
System as defined in this notice;
(3) How the Evaluation and Support
System will provide ongoing,
differentiated, targeted, and
personalized support and feedback for
improvement, including professional
development opportunities designed to
increase effectiveness during the entire
project period;
(4) A data system that links Educators
with student academic achievement
data; and
(5) How the HCMS uses performance
information from the Evaluation and
Support System to inform key schooland district-level human capital
decisions as decisions on preparation,
recruitment, hiring, placement,
retention, dismissal, compensation
(including performance-based
compensation), professional
development, tenure, and promotion,
particularly as they affect Educators
working in High-Need Schools in the
LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Note: The described HCMS, PBCS, and the
applicable Educator Evaluation and Support
Systems must meet the definition of these
terms in this notice. In addition, applicants
may optionally include other school
personnel (e.g., support staff, counselors, and
aides) in their HCMS as local circumstances
warrant.
Absolute Priority 2: Evaluation and
Support Systems for Teachers. To meet
this priority, the applicant must
include, in its application, a description
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92795
of how its project would enhance its
Evaluation and Support System for
teachers in High-Need Schools in the
LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Absolute Priority 3: Evaluation and
Support Systems for School Leaders. To
meet this priority, the applicant must
include, in its application, a description
of how its project would enhance its
Evaluation and Support System for
School Leaders in High-Need Schools in
the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Absolute Priority 4: Evaluation and
Support Systems for Teachers and
School Leaders. To meet this priority,
the applicant must include, in its
application, a description of how its
project would enhance its Evaluation
and Support System for teachers and
School Leaders in High-Need Schools in
the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Competitive Preference Priorities:
For FY 2017 and any subsequent year
in which we make awards from the list
of unfunded applications from this
competition, the following priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2) we award
additional points to an application
depending on how well the application
meets the competitive preference
priorities.
Applicants may apply under one, two,
or both competitive preference
priorities. An application can receive up
to 10 points for meeting Competitive
Preference Priority 1 and up to 5 points
for meeting Competitive Preference
Priority 2, depending on how well the
application meets these competitive
preference priorities. The maximum
total competitive preference priority
points an application may receive under
this competition is 15.
The competitive preference priorities
are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Using the HCMS to Improve Equitable
Access to Effective Educators (up to 10
points). Projects that are designed to
address the most significant gaps or
insufficiencies in student access to
effective teachers, School Leaders, or
both teachers and School Leaders, in
High-Need Schools, including gaps or
inequities in how effective teachers,
School Leaders, or both, are distributed
across the LEA or LEAs the project will
serve. At minimum, applicants must:
(1) Identify the most significant gaps
or insufficiencies in student access to
effective teachers, School Leaders, or
both, in High-Need Schools, including
gaps or inequities in how effective
teachers, School Leaders, or both, are
distributed across the LEA(s) the project
will serve;
(2) Identify relevant factors used in
determining such gaps, such as data on
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
92796
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
availability of school resources, staffing
patterns, school climate, and educator
support; and
(3) Describe how the strategies
proposed for closing the identified gaps
are aligned to and are consistent with
the strategies identified in the State’s
Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to
Excellent Educators, approved by the
Department in 2015.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Attracting, Supporting, and Retaining a
Diverse and Effective Workforce (up to
5 points). Projects that are designed to
attract, support, and retain a diverse and
effective workforce, including effective
teachers, School Leaders, or both, from
historically underrepresented
populations. At minimum, applicants
must provide a description detailing
their commitment to creating and
maintaining a diverse workforce, and
their plan for attracting, supporting, and
retaining diverse Educators.
Requirements: The following
requirements are from ESEA sections
2212 and 2213:
Requirement 1—Use of Funds:
Each applicant must demonstrate how
it will use TSL grant funds to develop,
implement, improve, or expand, in
collaboration with Educators and
members of the public, one or more of
the following:
(A) Developing or improving an
Evaluation and Support System,
including as part of an HCMS, that—
(i) Reflects clear and fair measures of
teacher or School Leader performance,
or both, based in part on demonstrated
improvement in student academic
achievement; and
(ii) Provides teachers, or School
Leaders, or both, with ongoing,
differentiated, targeted, and
personalized support and feedback for
improvement, including professional
development opportunities designed to
increase effectiveness.
(B) Conducting outreach within an
LEA or a State to gain input on how to
construct an Evaluation and Support
System and to develop support for the
Evaluation and Support System,
including by training appropriate
personnel in how to observe and
evaluate teachers, or School Leaders, or
both.
(C) Providing School Leaders with—
(i) Balanced autonomy to make
budgeting, scheduling, and other
school-level decisions in a manner that
meets the needs of the school without
compromising the intent or essential
components of the policies of the LEA
or State; and
(ii) Authority to make staffing
decisions that meet the needs of the
school, such as building an instructional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
leadership team that includes teacher
leaders or offering opportunities for
teams or pairs of effective teachers or
candidates to teach or start teaching in
High-Need Schools together.
(D) Implementing, as part of a
comprehensive PBCS, a differentiated
salary structure, which may include
bonuses and stipends, to one or both of
the following:
(i) Teachers who—
(I) Teach in High-Need Schools or
high-need subjects;
(II) Raise student academic
achievement; or
(III) Take on additional leadership
responsibilities; or
(ii) School Leaders who serve in HighNeed Schools and raise student
academic achievement in the schools.
(E) Improving the LEA’s system and
process for the recruitment, selection,
placement, and retention of effective
teachers, or School Leaders, or both, in
High-Need Schools, such as by
improving LEA policies and procedures
to ensure that High-Need schools are
competitive and timely in—
(i) Attracting, hiring, and retaining
effective Educators;
(ii) Offering bonuses or higher salaries
to effective Educators; or
(iii) Establishing or strengthening
School Leader Residency Programs and
Teacher Residency Programs.
(F) Instituting career advancement
opportunities characterized by
increased responsibility and pay that
reward and recognize effective teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders in
High-Need Schools and enable them to
expand their leadership and results,
such as through teacher-led professional
development, mentoring, coaching,
hybrid roles, administrative duties, and
career ladders.
Requirement 2—Matching:
Each applicant must provide a signed
assurance attesting to its intent and
ability to meet the TSL requirement in
section 2212(f) of the ESEA that the
applicant provide, from non-Federal
sources, an amount equal to 50 percent
of the amount of the grant, which may
be provided in cash or in kind, to carry
out the activities supported by the grant.
Applicants and grantees must budget
their matching contributions on an
annual basis relative to each annual
award of TSL grant funds.
Requirement 3—Documentation of
High-Need Schools:
Each applicant must demonstrate, in
its application, that at least the majority
of schools whose Educators will
participate in the implementation of the
TSL-funded PBCS are High-Need
Schools (as defined in this notice). In
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
doing so, each applicant must provide,
in its application—
(a) A list of schools in which the
proposed TSL-supported PBCS would
be implemented, and an identification
of which of these schools are High-Need
Schools;
(b) For each High-Need School listed,
the most current data on the percentage
of students who are eligible for free or
reduced-price lunch subsidies under the
Richard B. Russell National School
Lunch Act, or are considered students
from low-income families based on
another poverty measure that the LEA
uses under section 1113(a)(5) of the
ESEA (20 U.S.C. 6313(a)(5)); and
(c) A description of the applicant’s
rationale for extending the TSL-funded
PBCS to any Educators who are not
working in High-Need Schools.
Note: Data provided to demonstrate
eligibility as a High-Need School must be
school-level data; the Department will not
accept LEA- or State-level data for purposes
of documenting whether a school is a HighNeed School.
Definitions: The definitions of
Evaluation and Support System,
Evidence-Based, Human Capital
Management System (HCMS),
Performance-Based Compensation
System, School Leader, School Leader
Residency Program, and Teacher
Residency Program are from sections
2002, 2211, 2212, 8101(21), and
8101(44) of the ESEA. The definition of
High-Need School is based on
definitions of the term used in the 2012
and 2016 TIF competitions but, like the
definition in section 2211(b) of the
ESEA, focuses only on the extent of
family poverty of the students the
school serves. We are establishing the
definitions for Correlational Study with
Statistical Controls for Selection Bias,
Demonstrates a Rationale, Educators,
Experimental Study, Large Sample,
Logic Model, Meets What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with
Reservations, Meets What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without Reservations, Moderate
Evidence, Multi-Site Sample, Project
Component, Promising Evidence, QuasiExperimental Design Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Regression Discontinuity Design Study,
Relevant Finding, Relevant Outcome,
Single-Case Design Study, and Strong
Evidence for the FY 2017 grant
competition only, in accordance with
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C.
1232(d)(1).
Correlational Study with Statistical
Controls for Selection Bias means a
study that (1) estimates how a relevant
outcome varies with the receipt of a
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
project component, and (2) uses
sampling of analysis methods (e.g.,
multiple regression) to account for at
least some of the differences between
the groups being compared.
Demonstrates a Rationale means the
project component is supported by a
reasonable logic model that is informed
by research or an evaluation that
suggests how the project component is
likely to improve relevant outcomes.
Educator means a teacher, principal
or other School Leader.
Evaluation and Support System
means a system that is fair, rigorous,
valid, reliable, and objective and reflects
clear and fair measures of teacher,
principal, or other School Leader
performance, based in part on
demonstrated improvement in student
academic achievement; and provides
teachers, principals, or other School
Leaders with ongoing, differentiated,
targeted, and personalized support and
feedback for improvement, including
professional development opportunities
designed to increase effectiveness.
(ESEA Section 2212(c)(4) and (e)(2)(A))
Evidence-Based means the proposed
activity, strategy, or intervention is:
supported by strong evidence,
supported by moderate evidence,
supported by promising evidence, or
demonstrates a rationale. (ESEA section
8101(21))
Experimental Study means a study,
such as a Randomized Controlled Trial
(RCT), that is designed to compare
outcomes between two groups of
individuals that are otherwise
equivalent except for their assignment
to either a treatment group receiving a
project component or a control group
that does not. In some circumstances, a
finding from a Regression Discontinuity
Design Study (RDD) or findings from a
collection of Single-Case Design Studies
(SCDs) may be considered equivalent to
a finding from an RCT. RCTs and RDDs,
and collections of SCDs, depending on
design and implementation, can Meet
What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards without Reservations.
High-Need School means a school
with 50 percent or more of its
enrollment from low-income families,
based on eligibility for free or reducedprice lunch subsidies under the Richard
B. Russell National School Lunch Act,
or other poverty measures that LEAs use
consistent with ESEA section 1113(a)(5)
(20 U.S.C. 6313(a)(5). For middle and
high schools, eligibility may be
calculated on the basis of comparable
data from feeder schools. Eligibility as a
High-Need School under this definition
is determined on the basis of the most
currently available data.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
Human Capital Management System
(HCMS) means a system—
(A) By which a LEA makes and
implements human capital decisions,
such as decisions on preparation,
recruitment, hiring, placement,
retention, dismissal, compensation,
professional development, tenure, and
promotion; and
(B) That includes a PerformanceBased Compensation System. (ESEA
section 2211(b)(3))
Large Sample means an analytic
sample of 350 or more students (or other
single analysis units), or 50 or more
groups (such as classrooms or schools)
that each contain, on average, 10 or
more students (or other single analysis
units, regardless of whether these single
analysis units are disaggregated in the
analysis of outcomes for the groups).
Multiple studies can cumulatively meet
the Multi-Site Sample and Large Sample
requirements of Moderate Evidence or
Strong Evidence, as long as each study
meets the other requirements of the
particular level of evidence (i.e.,
Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence).
Logic Model (also known as a theory
of action) means a reasonable
conceptual framework that identifies
key components of the proposed project
(i.e., the active ‘‘ingredients’’ that are
hypothesized to be critical to achieving
the relevant outcomes) and describes
the theoretical and operational
relationships among the key
components and outcomes.
Meets What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards without
Reservations is the highest possible
rating for a study finding reviewed by
the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC).
Studies receiving this rating provide the
highest degree of confidence that an
estimated effect was caused by the
project component studied.
Experimental studies (as defined above)
may receive this highest rating. These
standards are described in the WWC
Procedures and Standards Handbooks,
Version 3.0, which can be accessed at
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
Meets What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with Reservations is
the second-highest rating for a group
design study reviewed by the WWC.
Studies receiving this rating provide a
reasonable degree of confidence that an
estimated effect was caused by the
project component studied. Both
Experimental Studies (such as
Randomized Controlled Trials with high
rates of sample attrition) and QuasiExperimental Design Studies (as defined
below) may receive this rating if they
establish the equivalence of the
treatment and comparison groups in key
baseline characteristics. These standards
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92797
are described in the WWC Procedures
and Standards Handbooks, Version 3.0,
which can be accessed at https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.https://
ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
Moderate Evidence means the
following conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one Experimental
or Quasi-Experimental Design Study of
the effectiveness of the project
component with a Relevant Finding that
Meets What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards With or without
Reservations (e.g., a Quasi-Experimental
Design Study or high-attrition
Randomized Controlled Trial that
establishes the equivalence of the
treatment and comparison groups in
student achievement at baseline);
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is of a statistically significant
and positive (i.e., favorable) effect on a
student outcome or other Relevant
Outcome, with no statistically
significant and overriding negative (i.e.,
unfavorable) evidence on that project
component from other findings
reviewed by and reported in the What
Works Clearinghouse that Meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards with or without Reservations;
(c) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is based on a sample that
overlaps with the populations (e.g., the
types of student served) or settings
proposed to receive the project
component (e.g., an after-school
program studied in urban high schools
and proposed for rural high schools);
and
(d) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is based on a Large Sample
and a Multi-Site Sample.
Multi-Site Sample means more than
one site, where site can be defined as a
local educational agency (LEA), locality,
or State. A sample could be multi-site if
it includes campuses in two or more
localities (e.g., cities or counties), even
if the campuses all belong to the same
LEA or postsecondary school system.
Multiple studies can cumulatively meet
the Multi-Site Sample and Large Sample
requirements of Moderate Evidence or
Strong Evidence, as long as each study
meets the other requirements of the
particular level of evidence (i.e.
Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence).
Performance-Based Compensation
System (PBCS) means a system of
compensation for teachers, principals,
or other School Leaders—
(A) That differentiates levels of
compensation based in part on
measurable increases in student
academic achievement; and
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
92798
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
(B) Which may include—
(i) Differentiated levels of
compensation, which may include
bonus pay, on the basis of the
employment responsibilities and
success of effective teachers, principals,
or other School Leaders in hard-to-staff
schools or high-need subject areas; and
(ii) Recognition of the skills and
knowledge of teachers, principals, or
other School Leaders as demonstrated
through—
(I) Successful fulfillment of additional
responsibilities or job functions, such as
teacher leadership roles; and
(II) Evidence of professional
achievement and mastery of content
knowledge and superior teaching and
leadership skills. (ESEA section
2211(b)(4))
Project Component means an activity,
strategy, or intervention included in a
project. Evidence may pertain to an
individual project component, or to a
combination of project components
(e.g., training teachers on instructional
practices for English learners and
follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Promising Evidence means the
following conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one study that is
a Correlational Study with Statistical
Controls for selection bias with a
Relevant Finding; and
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is of a statistically significant
and positive (i.e., favorable) effect of the
Project Component on a student
outcome or other Relevant Outcome
with no statistically significant and
overriding negative (i.e., unfavorable)
evidence on that Project Component
from other findings on the intervention
reviewed by and reported in the What
Works Clearinghouse that Meets What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards with or without Reservations.
Quasi-Experimental Design Study
(QED) means a study using a design that
attempts to approximate an
Experimental Design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the
treatment group in important respects.
This type of study, depending on design
and implementation, can Meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards with Reservations (but not
without Reservations).
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
means a study that employs random
assignment of, for example, students,
teachers, classrooms, or schools, to
receive the Project Component being
evaluated (the treatment group) or not to
receive the Project Component (the
control group). The estimated
effectiveness of the Project Component
is the difference between the average
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
outcomes for the treatment group and
for the control group. These studies,
depending on design and
implementation, can Meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without Reservations.
Regression Discontinuity Design
Study (RDD) means a study that assigns
the Project Component being evaluated
using a measured variable (e.g.,
assigning students reading below a
cutoff score to tutoring or
developmental education classes) and
controls for that variable in the analysis
of outcomes. The effectiveness of the
Project Component is estimated for
individuals who barely qualify to
receive that component. These studies,
depending on design and
implementation, can Meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without Reservations.
Relevant Finding means a finding
from a study regarding the relationship
between (A) an activity, strategy, or
intervention included as a component of
the Logic Model for the proposed
project, and (B) a student outcome or
other Relevant Outcome included in the
Logic Model for the proposed project.
Relevant Outcome means the student
outcome(s) (or the ultimate outcome if
not related to students) the proposed
Project Component is designed to
improve, consistent with the specific
goals of a program.
School Leader means a principal,
assistant principal, or other individual
who is:
(A) An employee or officer of an
elementary school or secondary school,
LEA, or other entity operating an
elementary school or secondary school;
and
(B) Responsible for the daily
instructional leadership and managerial
operations in the elementary school or
secondary school building. (ESEA
section 8101(44))
School Leader Residency Program
means a school-based principal or other
School Leader preparation program in
which a prospective principal or other
school leader—
(A) For one academic year, engages in
sustained and rigorous clinical learning
with substantial leadership
responsibilities and an opportunity to
practice and be evaluated in an
authentic school setting; and
(B) During that academic year—
(i) Participates in Evidence-Based
coursework, to the extent the State (in
consultation with LEAs in the State)
determines that such evidence is
reasonably available, that is integrated
with the clinical residency experience;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ii) Receives ongoing support from a
mentor principal or other school leader,
who is effective. (ESEA section 2002(1))
Single-case Design Study (SCD) means
a study that uses observations of a single
case (e.g., a student eligible for a
behavioral intervention) over time in the
absence and presence of a controlled
treatment manipulation to determine
whether the outcome is systematically
related to the treatment. According to
the WWC Single Case Design Pilot
Standards, a collection of these studies,
depending on design and
implementation (e.g., including a
sufficient number of cases and of data
points per condition), can Meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards without Reservations.
Strong Evidence means the following
conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one Experimental
Study (e.g., a Randomized Controlled
Trial) of the effectiveness of the Project
Component that has a Relevant Finding
that Meets the What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards
without Reservations (e.g., a
randomized controlled trial with low
rates of sample attrition overall and
between the treatment and control
groups);
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is of a statistically significant
and positive (i.e., favorable) effect on a
student outcome or other Relevant
Outcome, with no statistically
significant and overriding negative (i.e.,
unfavorable) evidence on that Project
Component from other findings that
Meet What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards with or without
Reservations;
(c) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is based on a sample that
overlaps with the populations (e.g., the
types of student served) and settings
proposed to receive the Project
Component (e.g., an after-school
program both studied in, and proposed
for, urban high schools); and
(d) The Relevant Finding in the study
described in paragraph (a) of this
definition is based on a Large Sample
and a Multi-Site Sample.
Teacher Residency Program means a
school-based teacher preparation
program in which a prospective
teacher—
(A) For not less than one academic
year, teaches alongside an effective
teacher, as determined by the State or
LEA, who is the teacher of record for the
classroom;
(B) Receives concurrent instruction
during the year described in
subparagraph (A)—
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
(i) Through courses that may be
taught by LEA personnel or by faculty
of the teacher preparation program; and
(ii) In the teaching of the content area
in which the teacher will become
certified or licensed; and
(C) Acquires effective teaching skills,
as demonstrated through completion of
a residency program, or other measure
determined by the State, which may
include a teacher performance
assessment. (ESEA section 2002(5))
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed priorities,
definitions, and requirements. Section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the
Secretary to exempt from rulemaking
requirements, regulations governing the
first grant competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition under
sections 2211–2213 of the ESEA, as
amended by the ESSA, and therefore
qualifies for this exemption. In order to
ensure timely grant awards, the
Secretary has decided to forego public
comment on the priorities,
requirements, and definitions under
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
priorities, requirements, and definitions
will apply to the FY 17 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Program Authority: Sections 2211–13
of the ESEA.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in (EDGAR)
34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3474.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $159
million.
For FY 2017, the Administration has
requested $250,000,000 under TSL. We
intend to use an estimated $159,000,000
of this funding for new awards under
this competition. The actual level of
funding, if any, depends on final
congressional action. However, we are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
inviting applications now to allow
enough time to complete the grant
process if Congress appropriates funds
for this program. Contingent upon the
availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional
awards in future years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$500,000–$12,000,000 for the first year
of the project period.
Note: The Department estimates a wide
range of awards given the potentially large
differences in the scope of funded projects,
including the size and number of
participating LEAs.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$10,000,000 for the first year of the
project period. Funding for the second
through fifth years of the project period
is subject to the availability of funds and
the approval of continuation awards
(see 34 CFR 75.253).
Estimated Number of Awards: 15–20.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months, with
renewal of up two additional years if the
grantee demonstrates to the Secretary
that the grantee is effectively using
funds. Such renewal may include
allowing the grantee to scale up or
replicate the successful program.
Consistent with ESEA section
2212(b)(3), a grantee may receive a TSL
grant (whether individually or as part of
a consortium or partnership) only twice.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
(a) An LEA, including a charter school
that is an LEA, or a consortium of LEAs.
(b) An SEA or other State agency
designated by the Chief Executive of a
State to participate.
(c) The Bureau of Indian Education; or
(d) A partnership consisting of—
(i) One or more agencies described in
subparagraph (a), (b), or (c); and
(ii) At least one nonprofit organization
as defined in 2 CFR 200.70 or at least
one for-profit entity.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching:
a. Matching: Under section 2212(f) of
the ESEA, each grant recipient must
provide, from non-Federal sources an
amount equal to 50 percent of the
amount of the grant (which may be
provided in cash or in kind) to carry out
the activities supported by the grant.
Each applicant will be required to
provide a signed assurance attesting to
its intent and ability to meet the
matching requirement.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This
program involves supplement-notsupplant funding requirements. In
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92799
accordance with section 2212(g) of the
ESEA, funds made available under this
program must be used to supplement,
and not supplant, other Federal or State
funds that would otherwise be
expended to carry out activities under
this program. The Secretary considers
all schools funded by the Department of
Interior’s Bureau of Indian Education to
be LEAs, and the funds that these
schools receive from the Department of
Interior’s annual appropriation to be
neither Federal nor State funds. Further,
the prohibition against supplanting also
means that grantees seeking to charge
indirect costs to TSL funds will need to
use their negotiated restricted indirect
cost rates. See 34 CFR 75.563.
3. Other: Application Requirements:
All applicants must meet the
following application requirements in
order to be considered for funding. The
application requirements are from ESEA
section 2212(c).
Each eligible applicant desiring a
grant under this program must submit
an application that contains—
(a) A description of the PBCS or
HCMS that the eligible applicant
proposes to develop, implement,
improve, or expand through the grant;
(b) A description of the most
significant gaps or insufficiencies in
student access to effective teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders in
High-Need Schools, as applicable to the
proposed project, including gaps or
inequities in how effective teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders are
distributed across the LEA, as identified
using factors such as data on school
resources, staffing patterns, school
environment, educator support systems,
and other school-level factors;
(c) A description and evidence of the
support and commitment from teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders, as
applicable to the proposed project,
which may include charter school
leaders, in the school (including
organizations representing teachers,
principals, or other school leaders), the
community, and the LEA to the
activities proposed under the grant;
(d) A description of how the eligible
applicant will develop and implement a
fair, rigorous, valid, reliable, and
objective process to evaluate teacher,
principal, or other school leader
performance, as applicable to the
proposed project, under the system that
is based in part on measures of student
academic achievement, including the
baseline performance against which
evaluations of improved performance
will be made;
(e) A description of the LEAs or
schools to be served under the grant,
including student academic
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
92800
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
achievement, demographic, and
socioeconomic information as identified
in the application package for this
program;
(f) A description of the effectiveness
of teachers, principals, or other School
Leaders, as applicable to the proposed
project, in the LEA or LEAs and the
schools to be served under the grant,
and the extent to which the system will
increase the effectiveness of teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders in
such schools;
(g) A description of how the eligible
applicant will use grant funds in each
year of the grant, including a timeline
for implementation of key grant
activities;
(h) A description of how the eligible
applicant will continue the activities
assisted under the grant after the grant
period ends;
(i) A description of the State, local, or
other public or private funds that will
be used to supplement the grant,
including funds under Title II, part A of
the ESEA, and sustain the activities
assisted under the grant after the end of
the grant period;
(j) A description of the rationale for
the project; how the proposed activities
are evidence-based; and if applicable
the prior experience of the eligible
entity in developing and implementing
such activities.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Note: In order to demonstrate that the
activities are evidence-based, an applicant
may, among other things, provide supporting
documentation for the study or studies that
serve as the evidence base for one or more
of the activities that will be implemented as
part of the proposed project. Additionally,
we encourage applicants to demonstrate in
their application that at least one of the
activities to be implemented as part of their
proposed project is based on Promising
Evidence (as defined in this notice). In recent
years, the TIF program has released various
reports that document the value of, and
explore the implementation of, an HCMS 7
that includes a PBCS.8 In addition, other
recent research also explores TSL-type
activities. We encourage applicants to
include evidence-based activities when
considering the full set of TSL activities,
such as:
• Educator preparation 9
7 Springer, M.G., Ballou, D., & Peng, A. (2008)
Impact of the Teacher Advancement Program on
student test score gains: Findings from an
independent appraisal.’’ Nashville: National Center
for Performance Incentives.
8 Chiang, H., Wellington, A., Hallgren, K.,
Speroni, C., Herrmann, M., Glazerman, S., and
Constantine, J. (2015). Evaluation of Teacher
Incentive Fund: Implementation and impacts of
pay-for-performance after two years (NCEE 2015–
4020). Washington, DC: National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
Education.
9 Silva, Tim, Allison McKie, Virginia Knechtel,
Philip Gleason, Libby Makowsky. (2014, available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
•
•
•
•
Recruitment
Educator Induction 10
Retention 11
Mentoring 12
(k) A description of how grant
activities will be evaluated, monitored,
and reported to the public.
Note: In addition, under 34 CFR 75.591, all
TSL grantees must cooperate in any
evaluation of the program conducted by the
Department.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: Orman Feres, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW., Room 453–6921 4W109,
Washington, DC 20202–6200.
Telephone: (202) 453–6921 or by email:
TSL@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the program contact
person listed in this section.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content and form of an application,
together with the forms you must
submit, are in the application package
for this program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: We will be
able to develop a more efficient process
for reviewing grant applications if we
can anticipate the number of applicants
at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20154015/)
Teaching Residency Programs: A Multisite Look at
a New Model to Prepare Teachers for High-Need
Schools (NCEE 2015–4002). Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Evaluation and
Regional Assistance, Institute of Education
Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
10 Glazerman, S., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson,
A., Isenberg, E., Lugo-Gil, J., Grider, M., & Britton,
E. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher
induction: Results from the first year of a
randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009–4034)
(available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/
67264. Washington, DC: National Center for
Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
Education
11 Allen, J.P., Pianta, R.C., Gregory, A., Mikami,
A.Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based
approach to enhancing secondary school
instruction and student achievement. Science,
333(6045), 1034–1037 (available at https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852503); New
findings on the retention of novice teachers from
teaching residency programs Extending work from
earlier study.
12 Allen, J.P., Pianta, R.C., Gregory, A., Mikami,
A.Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based
approach to enhancing secondary school
instruction and student achievement. Science,
333(6045), 1034–1037.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that intend to apply for funding under
this competition. Therefore, we strongly
encourage each potential applicant to
notify us of the applicant’s intent to
submit an application for funding by
sending a short email message. This
short email should provide (1) the
applicant organization’s name and
address; and (2) all priorities the
applicant intends to address. Please
send this email notification to TSL@
ed.gov with ‘‘Intent to Apply’’ in the
email subject line. Applicants that do
not provide this email notification may
still apply for funding and are not
required to, or prohibited from,
addressing priorities they do not
mention in their notice of intent to
apply.
Page Limit: The application narrative
is where you, the applicant, address the
selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. Applicants
should limit the application narrative to
no more than 40 pages, using the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ × 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Calibri, or
Arial.
The suggested page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, or the
letters of support. However, the
suggested page limit does apply to all of
the application narrative.
b. Submission of Proprietary
Information: Given the types of projects
that may be proposed in applications for
TSL, an application may include
business information that the applicant
considers proprietary. The Department’s
regulations define ‘‘business
information’’ in 34 CFR 5.11.
Because we plan to make successful
applications available to the public, you
may wish to request confidentiality of
business information.
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
believe is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: December 20,
2016.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
February 4, 2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: March 24, 2017.
Pre-application workshops will be
held for this competition shortly after
the date that this notice will publish.
The workshops are intended to provide
technical assistance to all interested
grant applicants. Detailed information
regarding the pre-application workshops
times, and online registration form, can
be found on the TSL Web site at: https://
innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacherquality/teacher-incentive-fund/.
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
Other Submission Requirements in
section IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: April 23, 2017.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM), the Government’s
primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information
while your application is under review
by the Department and, if you are
awarded a grant, during the project
period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet at the following
Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/
webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow two to five weeks for your
TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take
approximately seven business days, but
may take upwards of several weeks,
depending on the completeness and
accuracy of the data you enter into the
SAM database. Thus, if you think you
might want to apply for Federal
financial assistance under a program
administered by the Department, please
allow sufficient time to obtain and
register your DUNS number and TIN.
We strongly recommend that you
register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active,
it may be 24 to 48 hours before you can
access the information in, and submit an
application through, Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with
SAM, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your registration
annually. This may take three or more
business days.
Information about SAM is available at
www.SAM.gov. To further assist you
with obtaining and registering your
DUNS number and TIN in SAM or
updating your existing SAM account,
we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet,
which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92801
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
a. Electronic Submission of
Applications.
Applications for grants under TSL,
CFDA number 84.374A, must be
submitted electronically using the
Government-wide Grants.gov Apply site
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site,
you will be able to download a copy of
the application package, complete it
offline, and then upload and submit
your application. You may not email an
electronic copy of a grant application to
us.
We will reject your application if you
submit it in paper format unless, as
described elsewhere in this section, you
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
electronic submission requirement and
submit, no later than two weeks before
the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you
qualify for one of these exceptions.
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks
before the application deadline date is
provided later in this section under
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant
application for the TSL competition at
www.Grants.gov.You must search for the
downloadable application package for
this program by the CFDA number. Do
not include the CFDA number’s alpha
suffix in your search (e.g., search for
84.374, not 84.374A).
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site,
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically
through the site, as well as the hours of
operation.
• Applications received by
Grants.gov are date and time stamped.
Your application must be fully
uploaded and submitted and must be
date and time stamped by the
Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will
not accept your application if it is
received—that is, date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system—after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date. We do
not consider an application that does
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
92802
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
not comply with the deadline
requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you do not wait until the application
deadline date to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
• You should review and follow the
Education Submission Procedures for
submitting an application through
Grants.gov that are included in the
application package for this program to
ensure that you submit your application
in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
system. You can also find the Education
Submission Procedures pertaining to
Grants.gov under News and Events on
the Department’s G5 system home page
at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific
guidance and procedures for submitting
an application through Grants.gov,
please refer to the Grants.gov Web site
at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/
applicants/apply-for-grants.html.
• You will not receive additional
point value because you submit your
application in electronic format, nor
will we penalize you if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
your application in paper format.
• You must submit all documents
electronically, including all information
you typically provide on the following
forms: the Application for Federal
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for
SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
necessary assurances and certifications.
• You must upload any narrative
sections and all other attachments to
your application as files in a read-only,
non-modifiable Portable Document
Format (PDF). Do not upload an
interactive or fillable PDF file. If you
upload a file type other than a readonly, non-modifiable PDF (e.g., Word,
Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a
password-protected file, we will not
review that material. Please note that
this could result in your application not
being considered for funding because
the material in question—for example,
the application narrative—is critical to a
meaningful review of your proposal. For
that reason it is important to allow
yourself adequate time to upload all
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
material as PDF files. The Department
will not convert material from other
formats to PDF.
• Your electronic application must
comply with any page-limit
requirements described in this notice.
• After you electronically submit
your application, you will receive from
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
tracking number. This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by
email if your application met all the
Grants.gov validation requirements or if
there were any errors (such as
submission of your application by
someone other than a registered
Authorized Organization
Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that
contains special characters). You will be
given an opportunity to correct any
errors and resubmit, but you must still
meet the deadline for submission of
applications.
Once your application is successfully
validated by Grants.gov, the Department
will retrieve your application from
Grants.gov and send you an email with
a unique PR/Award number for your
application.
These emails do not mean that your
application is without any disqualifying
errors. While your application may have
been successfully validated by
Grants.gov, it must also meet the
Department’s application requirements
as specified in this notice and in the
application instructions. Disqualifying
errors could include, for instance,
failure to upload attachments in a readonly, non-modifiable PDF; failure to
submit a required part of the
application; or failure to meet applicant
eligibility requirements. It is your
responsibility to ensure that your
submitted application has met all of the
Department’s requirements.
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that the problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. We will
contact you after we determine whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because––
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevents you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Orman Feres, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 4W109,
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
Washington, DC 20202–6200. FAX:
(202) 260–8969.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications
by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.374A), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
We will not consider applications
postmarked after the application
deadline date.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.374A), 550 12th
Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center accepts
hand deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time,
except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal
holidays.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: We are
establishing the selection criterion ‘‘The
extent to which the proposed project
demonstrates a rationale’’ and criterion
(c)(3) for the FY 2017 grant competition
only, in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
The other selection criteria for this
program are from 34 CFR 75.210.
The maximum score for all the
selection criteria is 100 points. The
maximum score for each criterion is
indicated in parentheses. The selection
criteria for this competition are as
follows:
(a) Evidence of Support(30 points).
In determining evidence of support of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed
project is part of a comprehensive effort
to improve teaching and learning and
support rigorous academic standards for
students.
(2) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
involve the collaboration of appropriate
partners for maximizing the
effectiveness of project services.
(3) The extent to which the proposed
project will integrate with or build on
similar or related efforts to improve
relevant outcomes (as defined in 34 CFR
77.1(c)), using existing funding streams
from other programs or policies
supported by community, State, and
Federal resources.
(b) Need for Project (25 points).
In determining the need for the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed
project will provide services or
otherwise address the needs of students
at risk of educational failure.
(2) The extent to which specific gaps
or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have
been identified and will be addressed by
the proposed project, including the
nature and magnitude of those gaps or
weaknesses.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92803
(c) Quality of the Project Design (20
points).
In determining the quality of the
project design of the proposed project,
the Secretary considers the following
factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed
project demonstrates a rationale.
(2) The extent to which the design of
the proposed project is appropriate to,
and will successfully address, the needs
of the target population or other
identified needs.
(3) The extent to which the grant
activities will be evaluated, monitored,
and reported to the public.
(d) Quality of the management plan
(20 points).
In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
adequacy of the management plan to
achieve the objectives of the proposed
project on time and within budget,
including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks.
(e) Adequacy of resources (5 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy
of resources for the proposed project
based on the following factors:
(1) The potential for continued
support of the project after Federal
funding ends, including, as appropriate,
the demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support.
(2) The potential for the incorporation
of project purposes, activities, or
benefits into the ongoing program of the
agency of organization at the end of the
Federal funding.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Special
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
92804
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
this program the Department conducts a
review of the risks posed by applicants.
Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may
impose special conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or
grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management
system that does not meet the standards
in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $150,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through SAM. You may
review and comment on any
information about yourself that a
Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
(d) By reporting on these performance
measures in annual and final
performance reports, grantees will
satisfy the requirement in Section 8101
(21)(A)(ii)(II) of the ESEA, as amended,
for projects relying on the
‘‘demonstrates a rationale’’ evidence
level, to have ‘‘ongoing efforts to
examine the effects’’ of the funded
activity, strategy, or intervention.
4. Performance Measures: Pursuant to
the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993, the Department has
established the following performance
measures that it will use to evaluate the
overall effectiveness of the grantee’s
project, as well as the TIF program as a
whole:
(a) The percentage of Educators in all
schools who earned Performance-Based
Compensation.
(b) The percentage of Educators in all
High-Need Schools who earned
Performance-Based Compensation.
(c) The gap between the retention rate
of Educators receiving PerformanceBased Compensation and the average
retention rate of Educators in each HighNeed School whose Educators
participate in the project.
(d) The number of school districts
participating in a TSL grant that use
Educator Evaluation and Support
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Systems to inform the following human
capital decisions: recruitment; hiring;
placement; retention; dismissal;
professional development; tenure;
promotion; or all of the above.
(e) The number of High-Need Schools
within districts participating in a TSL
grant that use Educator Evaluation and
Support Systems to inform the
following human capital decisions:
recruitment; hiring; placement;
retention; dismissal; professional
development; tenure; promotion; or all
of the above.
(f) The percentage of PerformanceBased Compensation paid to Educators
with State, local, or other non-TIF
Federal resources.
(g) The percentage of teachers and
principals who receive the highest
effectiveness rating.
(h) The percentage of teachers and
principals in High-Needs Schools who
receive the highest effectiveness rating.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Orman Feres, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 4W109, Washington, DC 20202–
6200. Telephone: (202) 453–6921 or by
email: TSL@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the
FRS, toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 20, 2016 / Notices
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or PDF. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Office of
Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2016–30643 Filed 12–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2016–ICCD–0113]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
NCER–NPNCER–NPSAS Grant Study—
Financial Aid Nudges 2017: A National
Experiment To Increase Retention of
Financial Aid and College Persistence
National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES), Department of
Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a new information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before January
19, 2017.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2016–ICCD–0113. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Dec 19, 2016
Jkt 241001
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E–347, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact NCES
Information Collections at
NCES.Information.Collections@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: NCER–NPNCER–
NPSAS Grant Study—Financial Aid
Nudges 2017: A National Experiment to
Increase Retention of Financial Aid and
College Persistence.
OMB Control Number: 1850–NEW.
Type of Review: A new information
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 102,000.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 10,540.
Abstract: In 2010, the National Center
for Education Research (NCER) and the
National Center for Education Statistics
(NCES), both within the U.S.
Department of Education’s Institute of
Education Sciences (IES), began
collaborating on an education grant
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92805
opportunity related to the crosssectional National Postsecondary
Student Aid Study (NPSAS). NPSAS is
a large, nationally-representative sample
of postsecondary institutions and
students that contains student-level
records on student demographics and
family background, work experience,
expectations, receipt of financial aid,
and postsecondary enrollment (see
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/npsas/
about.asp; (OMB #1850–0666)). Since
1987, NPSAS has been fielded every 3
to 4 years, most recently during the
2015–16 academic year. The goal of the
NCER–NPSAS grant opportunity
collaboration is to provide researchers
with the possibility of developing
unique research projects pertaining to
college persistence and completion that
utilize a subset of the NPSAS sample
that is not already set aside for one of
the NPSAS-based longitudinal studies
(BPS or B&B). Under the NCER–NPSAS
grant opportunity, researchers can
submit applications to the
Postsecondary and Adult Education
topic within the Education Research
Grants program (CFDA 84.305A), under
either the Exploration or Efficacy and
Replication research goal. Consistent
with these two goals, NCER supports
research projects using NPSAS to: (1)
Explore relationships between malleable
factors (e.g., information on benefits of
financial aid and FAFSA renewal) and
postsecondary persistence and
completion, as well as the mediators
and moderators of those relationships;
and (2) evaluate the efficacy of
interventions aimed at improving
persistence and completion of
postsecondary education (e. g., financial
aid and FAFSA renewal advice
delivered via text messaging).
Researchers approved for funding
through this program can obtain indirect
access to a subsample of the national
NPSAS sample (after the study’s student
interviews are completed) in order to
conduct unique research projects that
adhere to the guidelines set forth in the
Request for Applications (RFA) for the
Education Research Grants Program, as
well as guidelines set forth by NCES and
the NPSAS program. This request is to
conduct, in 2017, the ‘‘Financial Aid
Nudges 2017: A National Experiment to
Increase Retention of Financial Aid and
College Persistence’’ study, funded by
the NCER–NPSAS grant and designed to
measure the effectiveness of an
intervention that will provide financial
aid information, reminders, and
advising to college students who were
initially interviewed as part of
NPSAS:16.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92793-92805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-30643]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Teacher and School Leader Incentive
Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview Information
Teacher and School Leader Incentive Program (TSL) Notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2017.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.374A.
Dates:
Applications Available: December 20, 2016.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: February 4, 2017.
Dates of Pre-Application Workshops: For information about pre-
application workshops, visit the TSL Web site at: https://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-incentive-fund/.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 24, 2017.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: April 23, 2017.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of TSL is to assist States, local
educational agencies (LEAs), and nonprofit organizations to develop,
implement, improve, or expand comprehensive performance-based
compensation systems or human capital management systems for teachers,
principals, and other school leaders (especially for teachers,
principals, and other school leaders in high-need schools) who raise
student academic achievement and close the achievement gap between
high- and low-performing students. In addition, a portion of TSL funds
are dedicated to study the effectiveness, fairness, quality,
consistency, and reliability of performance-based compensation systems
or human capital management systems for teachers, principals, and other
school leaders.
Background:
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as
reauthorized on December 10, 2015, by the Every Student Succeeds Act
(ESSA),\1\ established the Teacher and School Leader Incentive Fund
(TSL) program. TSL builds on the former Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF)
program and promotes Performance-Based Compensation Systems (PBCSs) \2\
and comprehensive Human Capital Management Systems (HCMSs) that support
teachers, principals, and other school leaders (i.e., Educators as used
in this notice). In recognition of the importance that effective school
leadership has on student achievement, TSL also promotes comprehensive
Evaluation and Support Systems for all Educators within an LEA,
especially those serving in high-need schools. In addition, TSL seeks
to contribute to the body of knowledge regarding impactful approaches
to enhancing Educator effectiveness by promoting the study of the
efficacy, fairness, quality, consistency, and reliability of these
systems to support Educators through an independent, Department-led
evaluation to assess the program's effectiveness and relevant lessons
learned. Further, the Department seeks to ensure that the design of the
TSL competition reflects the new provisions of the TSL statute in ESEA
sections 2211-2213, as well as the lessons learned from 10 years of
implementing the TIF program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Unless otherwise noted, references in this notice to
sections of the ESEA as reauthorized by ESSA are identified as
sections of the ESEA.
\2\ Throughout this notice, all defined terms are denoted with
capitals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Results from the TIF program have varied across and within the
portfolio of five cohorts of TIF grantees, comprised of over 140
grantees that received a total of about $2 billion in grant awards.
Successful TIF grantees implemented comprehensive efforts to help
teachers and principals learn and grow throughout their professional
trajectories. Successful TIF grantees also considered recruitment,
induction, support and career development, and growth and leadership
opportunities aligned with the LEA's overall improvement strategy; and
they used multi-measure evaluation systems to inform the development of
innovative incentives and structures that support teachers' and
principals' growth and advancement. LEAs also used TIF funds to develop
their cadre of leaders.
With the priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection
criterion used for this competition, we seek to build on the efforts of
the TIF program and abundant research over two decades showing that
teachers and teacher effectiveness are the most critical in-school
factors in improving student outcomes.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Aaronson, Daniel, Barrow, Lisa, & Sander, William,
``Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High
Schools.'' (2007), Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135;
Rivkin, Steven, Hanushek, Eric & Kain, John, ``Teachers, Schools,
and Academic Achievement.'' (2005), Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, we have learned that effective principals and other
School Leaders are crucial to strengthening teaching and school
communities, and play a critical role in students' academic success--
especially in high-need schools--by creating cultures of high
expectations.\4\ Indeed, teachers cite a principal's support and
effectiveness as a leading factor that contributes to their decision to
remain in the profession.\5\ Effective School Leaders directly impact
the quality of instruction through hiring decisions of school personnel
that provide instructional leadership, support, and develop teachers--
which, in turn, can help teachers focus their
[[Page 92794]]
efforts on student learning.\6\ Effective School Leaders also create a
vision of academic success for all children in their schools and
encourage other Educators to take on leadership roles and
responsibilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Impact Evaluation of Support for Principals,'' https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/tq_principals.asp (2014);
Leithwood, Kenneth, et al., ``How Leadership Influences Student
Learning: Review of Research'' (2004) New York: The Wallace
Foundation, available at https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/How-Leadership-Influences-Student-Learning.pdf.
\5\ Ingersoll, Richard. ``Teacher Turnover, Teacher Shortages,
and the Organization of Schools.'' University of Washington. (2001).
\6\ Papa, Frank, Hamilton Lankford, and James Wyckoff, ``Hiring
Teachers in New York's Public Schools: Can the Principal Make a
Difference?'' University (2008) available at Albany, SUNY.
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15700760701655524?mobileUi=0&;
Wallace Foundation, ``The School Principal as Leader: Guiding
Schools to Better Teaching and Learning'' (2013 available at
www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/The-School-Principal-as-Leader-Guiding-Schools-to-Better-Teaching-and-Learning-2nd-Ed.pdf; Ikemoto, Gina, et al., New Leaders, ``Playmakers: How
great principals build and lead great teams of teachers''(2012)
available at www.newleaders.org/wp-content/uploads/Playmakers.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the importance of ensuring that Educators are as effective as
possible--especially in high-need schools, where equal educational
opportunity is particularly important for historically underserved
students--TSL is designed to utilize PBCSs and other supports for
Educators as a central part of an LEA's effort to improve student
academic achievement. Indeed, the TSL statute gives priority to
applicants that propose to focus supports on Educators in High-Need
Schools. By providing Educators with PBCSs, in which performance-based
compensation may include robust career ladder opportunities for
effective Educators, TSL aims to reward Educators for their
effectiveness and improved student outcomes.
Recent cohorts of TIF grantees expanded LEA teacher and principal
evaluation systems to include all teachers and principals in a given
LEA, and measured educator performance using multiple factors,
including classroom observations and gains in student academic
achievement. Using the information generated from these more
comprehensive teacher and principal evaluation systems, successful TIF
grantees began to transform how effective teachers and principals were
compensated, moving beyond the episodic performance-based bonuses that
were more typical of early TIF cohorts. Recent cohorts of TIF grantees
also began complementing their compensation incentives with non-
compensation supports in order to build stronger support systems
throughout teachers' and principals' trajectory, from pre-service
through retention. These strategies included using teacher and
principal evaluation systems to inform decisions about recruitment,
retention, tenure, compensation, support, and leadership potential.
Successful TIF grantees also demonstrated that implementing
successful Educator Evaluation and Support Systems that inform
performance-based compensation can occur across a wide range of
contexts. However, based on reports from grantees and from evaluations
of early TIF cohorts, the most promising TIF-supported efforts appear
to be those that are designed to support instructional improvements
through use of classroom and school-level data, to create a shared
understanding of effective classroom-level practices.
In recent years, many States and LEAs have developed high-quality
Educator Evaluation and Support systems as part of their efforts to
improve LEAs' hiring practices, provide Educators with meaningful
feedback and targeted professional development, and use information on
Educator performance to inform key school- and district-level
decisions. As such, an increasing number of LEAs are well-equipped to
make human capital decisions that both support Educators and improve
student outcomes. In view of the work and resources that many LEAs have
already invested in an HCMS, PBCS, and Educator Evaluation and Support
Systems that already meet provisions of the TSL statute, and the desire
to have make awards to applicants who are ready to expand upon their
existing work, we have structured this competition to permit LEAs to
build upon and improve existing HCMS, PBCS, and Educator Evaluation and
Support Systems that meet the definitions of these terms in this notice
that come from the TSL statute. Doing so could include efforts to
improve the Educator Evaluation and Support Systems (e.g., make them
even more fair, reliable, and credible; better align formative and
summative assessments with college- and career-ready standards; or
provide more mentoring and coaching to support Educators) as well as
efforts to have the HCMS and Educator Evaluation and Support Systems
address new challenges or opportunities (e.g., partnering with
institutions of higher education to strengthen pre-service programming
or creating a teacher residency program, including one that is
consistent with the definition of the term in section 2002(5) of the
ESEA.) The Department encourages applicants to reflect these types of
efforts in their TSL applications.
Moreover, much work remains to ensure that students, particularly
those whose families live in poverty, have equitable access to the most
effective Educators. In order to help ensure that every public school
student has equitable access to excellent Educators, in 2014 the
Department asked each State educational agency (SEA) to submit a State
Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to Excellent Educators describing how
it will ensure that ``poor and minority children are not taught at
higher rates than other children by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-
of-field teachers,'' as formerly required by section 1111(b)(8)(C) of
the ESEA, as reauthorized by the No Child Left Behind Act (now section
1111(g)(1)(B) of the ESEA, as amended by ESSA). All 50 States, the
District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico developed
plans that the Department approved in 2015. States began to implement
these plans in the 2015-16 school year. Several of the States' proposed
approaches reflected in these plans include performance-based
compensation, including strategies such as career pathways that TSL
funds could support. Therefore, the Department encourages applicants to
align their TSL proposals to their State plans, and has established a
priority for this purpose. In addition, given the emerging literature
on the importance of educator diversity, the Department encourages
applicants to leverage TSL resources to diversify their Educator
workforce, and, similarly, has established a second priority for this
purpose. More information on the importance of educator workforce
diversity can be found in the Department's report on The State of
Racial Diversity in the Educator Workforce at the following link:
https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/highered/racial-diversity/state-racial-diversity-workforce.pdf.
Historically, the TIF program focused its efforts on implementing
performance-based compensation in high-need schools. Under provisions
that include ESEA sections 2211(a) and (b)(2) and 2212(d)(1), TSL
continues to ensure that grantees focus their activities on teachers
and School Leaders in high-need schools. In this regard, ESEA section
2211(b)(2) defines a High-Need School as a public elementary or
secondary school that is located in an area in which the percentage of
students from families with incomes below the poverty line is 30
percent or more. The definition of poverty line in ESEA section
8101(41) effectively requires the Department to use poverty line data
gathered by the U.S. Census Bureau since no other data that meet this
definition are available.
However, the Department has determined that the school-level
poverty-line data required by the definition of High-Need School are
unavailable; the U.S. Census Bureau reports these data only by LEA. As
such,
[[Page 92795]]
in order to ensure that awards made under this competition still focus
on schools that are high-poverty, the Secretary is exercising the
orderly transition authority in section 4(b) of ESSA to define a High-
Need School for purposes of this competition using the same poverty
measure applicable to the definition of a High-Need School for the past
three TIF competitions. Since the income of a family below the poverty
line is much lower than the income a family needs to enable its
children to be eligible for free or reduced-price lunch subsidies under
the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (the poverty measure
used in all prior TIF competitions), we believe that use of the prior
TIF poverty measure to determine which schools are high-need is also a
reasonable approach to implementing Congressional intent for TSL.
Priorities: This notice contains four absolute priorities and two
competitive preference priorities. We are establishing these
priorities, requirements, and definitions for the FY 2017 grant
competition, and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the
list of unfunded applications from this competition, in accordance with
section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), 20
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priorities: The following priorities are absolute
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), applications must meet the
following absolute priorities in order to be considered for awards:
Absolute Priority 1: Human Capital Management System; and
one of the three following Absolute Priorities:
Absolute Priority 2: Evaluation and Support Systems for
Teachers;
Absolute Priority 3: Evaluation and Support Systems for
School Leaders; or
Absolute Priority 4: Evaluation and Support Systems for
Teachers and School Leaders.
Note: Applicants must indicate in their applications under which
absolute priorities they are applying. Applications that do not
clearly address Absolute Priority 1 and one of the other absolute
priorities (Absolute Priorities 2, 3, or 4) will not be reviewed.
Assuming that applications in each funding category are of
sufficient quality, the Secretary intends to award grants under each of
the three following funding categories:
(a) Evaluation and Support Systems for Teachers;
(b) Evaluation and Support Systems for School Leaders; and
(c) Evaluation and Support Systems for Teachers and School Leaders.
Applications in each funding category will be peer reviewed, scored
based on the selection criteria announced in this notice, and placed in
rank order. Consistent with section 2212(d)(2) of the ESEA, to the
extent practicable, the Secretary will award an equitable geographic
distribution of grants, including the distribution of such grants
between rural and urban areas.
The absolute priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Human Capital Management System (HCMS). To
meet this priority, the applicant must include, in its application, a
description of its existing LEA-wide HCMS (or, in the case of a
consortium application or an SEA application, the shared HCMS that
currently exists across the proposed LEAs that will participate in this
project), including a description of its PBCS. In addition, the
application must describe--
(1) How the HCMS currently includes an Evaluation and Support
System for teachers, School Leaders, or both, that reflects clear and
fair measures of performance, based in part on demonstrated improvement
in student academic achievement;
(2) Any proposed modifications of the HCMS under the proposed
project, including modifications that expand or improve the Evaluation
and Support System as defined in this notice;
(3) How the Evaluation and Support System will provide ongoing,
differentiated, targeted, and personalized support and feedback for
improvement, including professional development opportunities designed
to increase effectiveness during the entire project period;
(4) A data system that links Educators with student academic
achievement data; and
(5) How the HCMS uses performance information from the Evaluation
and Support System to inform key school- and district-level human
capital decisions as decisions on preparation, recruitment, hiring,
placement, retention, dismissal, compensation (including performance-
based compensation), professional development, tenure, and promotion,
particularly as they affect Educators working in High-Need Schools in
the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Note: The described HCMS, PBCS, and the applicable Educator
Evaluation and Support Systems must meet the definition of these
terms in this notice. In addition, applicants may optionally include
other school personnel (e.g., support staff, counselors, and aides)
in their HCMS as local circumstances warrant.
Absolute Priority 2: Evaluation and Support Systems for Teachers.
To meet this priority, the applicant must include, in its application,
a description of how its project would enhance its Evaluation and
Support System for teachers in High-Need Schools in the LEA or LEAs the
project will serve.
Absolute Priority 3: Evaluation and Support Systems for School
Leaders. To meet this priority, the applicant must include, in its
application, a description of how its project would enhance its
Evaluation and Support System for School Leaders in High-Need Schools
in the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Absolute Priority 4: Evaluation and Support Systems for Teachers
and School Leaders. To meet this priority, the applicant must include,
in its application, a description of how its project would enhance its
Evaluation and Support System for teachers and School Leaders in High-
Need Schools in the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
Competitive Preference Priorities:
For FY 2017 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition, the following
priorities are competitive preference priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(2) we award additional points to an application depending on
how well the application meets the competitive preference priorities.
Applicants may apply under one, two, or both competitive preference
priorities. An application can receive up to 10 points for meeting
Competitive Preference Priority 1 and up to 5 points for meeting
Competitive Preference Priority 2, depending on how well the
application meets these competitive preference priorities. The maximum
total competitive preference priority points an application may receive
under this competition is 15.
The competitive preference priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: Using the HCMS to Improve
Equitable Access to Effective Educators (up to 10 points). Projects
that are designed to address the most significant gaps or
insufficiencies in student access to effective teachers, School
Leaders, or both teachers and School Leaders, in High-Need Schools,
including gaps or inequities in how effective teachers, School Leaders,
or both, are distributed across the LEA or LEAs the project will serve.
At minimum, applicants must:
(1) Identify the most significant gaps or insufficiencies in
student access to effective teachers, School Leaders, or both, in High-
Need Schools, including gaps or inequities in how effective teachers,
School Leaders, or both, are distributed across the LEA(s) the project
will serve;
(2) Identify relevant factors used in determining such gaps, such
as data on
[[Page 92796]]
availability of school resources, staffing patterns, school climate,
and educator support; and
(3) Describe how the strategies proposed for closing the identified
gaps are aligned to and are consistent with the strategies identified
in the State's Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to Excellent Educators,
approved by the Department in 2015.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: Attracting, Supporting, and
Retaining a Diverse and Effective Workforce (up to 5 points). Projects
that are designed to attract, support, and retain a diverse and
effective workforce, including effective teachers, School Leaders, or
both, from historically underrepresented populations. At minimum,
applicants must provide a description detailing their commitment to
creating and maintaining a diverse workforce, and their plan for
attracting, supporting, and retaining diverse Educators.
Requirements: The following requirements are from ESEA sections
2212 and 2213:
Requirement 1--Use of Funds:
Each applicant must demonstrate how it will use TSL grant funds to
develop, implement, improve, or expand, in collaboration with Educators
and members of the public, one or more of the following:
(A) Developing or improving an Evaluation and Support System,
including as part of an HCMS, that--
(i) Reflects clear and fair measures of teacher or School Leader
performance, or both, based in part on demonstrated improvement in
student academic achievement; and
(ii) Provides teachers, or School Leaders, or both, with ongoing,
differentiated, targeted, and personalized support and feedback for
improvement, including professional development opportunities designed
to increase effectiveness.
(B) Conducting outreach within an LEA or a State to gain input on
how to construct an Evaluation and Support System and to develop
support for the Evaluation and Support System, including by training
appropriate personnel in how to observe and evaluate teachers, or
School Leaders, or both.
(C) Providing School Leaders with--
(i) Balanced autonomy to make budgeting, scheduling, and other
school-level decisions in a manner that meets the needs of the school
without compromising the intent or essential components of the policies
of the LEA or State; and
(ii) Authority to make staffing decisions that meet the needs of
the school, such as building an instructional leadership team that
includes teacher leaders or offering opportunities for teams or pairs
of effective teachers or candidates to teach or start teaching in High-
Need Schools together.
(D) Implementing, as part of a comprehensive PBCS, a differentiated
salary structure, which may include bonuses and stipends, to one or
both of the following:
(i) Teachers who--
(I) Teach in High-Need Schools or high-need subjects;
(II) Raise student academic achievement; or
(III) Take on additional leadership responsibilities; or
(ii) School Leaders who serve in High-Need Schools and raise
student academic achievement in the schools.
(E) Improving the LEA's system and process for the recruitment,
selection, placement, and retention of effective teachers, or School
Leaders, or both, in High-Need Schools, such as by improving LEA
policies and procedures to ensure that High-Need schools are
competitive and timely in--
(i) Attracting, hiring, and retaining effective Educators;
(ii) Offering bonuses or higher salaries to effective Educators; or
(iii) Establishing or strengthening School Leader Residency
Programs and Teacher Residency Programs.
(F) Instituting career advancement opportunities characterized by
increased responsibility and pay that reward and recognize effective
teachers, principals, or other School Leaders in High-Need Schools and
enable them to expand their leadership and results, such as through
teacher-led professional development, mentoring, coaching, hybrid
roles, administrative duties, and career ladders.
Requirement 2--Matching:
Each applicant must provide a signed assurance attesting to its
intent and ability to meet the TSL requirement in section 2212(f) of
the ESEA that the applicant provide, from non-Federal sources, an
amount equal to 50 percent of the amount of the grant, which may be
provided in cash or in kind, to carry out the activities supported by
the grant. Applicants and grantees must budget their matching
contributions on an annual basis relative to each annual award of TSL
grant funds.
Requirement 3--Documentation of High-Need Schools:
Each applicant must demonstrate, in its application, that at least
the majority of schools whose Educators will participate in the
implementation of the TSL-funded PBCS are High-Need Schools (as defined
in this notice). In doing so, each applicant must provide, in its
application--
(a) A list of schools in which the proposed TSL-supported PBCS
would be implemented, and an identification of which of these schools
are High-Need Schools;
(b) For each High-Need School listed, the most current data on the
percentage of students who are eligible for free or reduced-price lunch
subsidies under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, or
are considered students from low-income families based on another
poverty measure that the LEA uses under section 1113(a)(5) of the ESEA
(20 U.S.C. 6313(a)(5)); and
(c) A description of the applicant's rationale for extending the
TSL-funded PBCS to any Educators who are not working in High-Need
Schools.
Note: Data provided to demonstrate eligibility as a High-Need
School must be school-level data; the Department will not accept
LEA- or State-level data for purposes of documenting whether a
school is a High-Need School.
Definitions: The definitions of Evaluation and Support System,
Evidence-Based, Human Capital Management System (HCMS), Performance-
Based Compensation System, School Leader, School Leader Residency
Program, and Teacher Residency Program are from sections 2002, 2211,
2212, 8101(21), and 8101(44) of the ESEA. The definition of High-Need
School is based on definitions of the term used in the 2012 and 2016
TIF competitions but, like the definition in section 2211(b) of the
ESEA, focuses only on the extent of family poverty of the students the
school serves. We are establishing the definitions for Correlational
Study with Statistical Controls for Selection Bias, Demonstrates a
Rationale, Educators, Experimental Study, Large Sample, Logic Model,
Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with Reservations,
Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without Reservations,
Moderate Evidence, Multi-Site Sample, Project Component, Promising
Evidence, Quasi-Experimental Design Study, Randomized Controlled Trial,
Regression Discontinuity Design Study, Relevant Finding, Relevant
Outcome, Single-Case Design Study, and Strong Evidence for the FY 2017
grant competition only, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA,
20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Correlational Study with Statistical Controls for Selection Bias
means a study that (1) estimates how a relevant outcome varies with the
receipt of a
[[Page 92797]]
project component, and (2) uses sampling of analysis methods (e.g.,
multiple regression) to account for at least some of the differences
between the groups being compared.
Demonstrates a Rationale means the project component is supported
by a reasonable logic model that is informed by research or an
evaluation that suggests how the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Educator means a teacher, principal or other School Leader.
Evaluation and Support System means a system that is fair,
rigorous, valid, reliable, and objective and reflects clear and fair
measures of teacher, principal, or other School Leader performance,
based in part on demonstrated improvement in student academic
achievement; and provides teachers, principals, or other School Leaders
with ongoing, differentiated, targeted, and personalized support and
feedback for improvement, including professional development
opportunities designed to increase effectiveness. (ESEA Section
2212(c)(4) and (e)(2)(A))
Evidence-Based means the proposed activity, strategy, or
intervention is: supported by strong evidence, supported by moderate
evidence, supported by promising evidence, or demonstrates a rationale.
(ESEA section 8101(21))
Experimental Study means a study, such as a Randomized Controlled
Trial (RCT), that is designed to compare outcomes between two groups of
individuals that are otherwise equivalent except for their assignment
to either a treatment group receiving a project component or a control
group that does not. In some circumstances, a finding from a Regression
Discontinuity Design Study (RDD) or findings from a collection of
Single-Case Design Studies (SCDs) may be considered equivalent to a
finding from an RCT. RCTs and RDDs, and collections of SCDs, depending
on design and implementation, can Meet What Works Clearinghouse
Evidence Standards without Reservations.
High-Need School means a school with 50 percent or more of its
enrollment from low-income families, based on eligibility for free or
reduced-price lunch subsidies under the Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act, or other poverty measures that LEAs use consistent
with ESEA section 1113(a)(5) (20 U.S.C. 6313(a)(5). For middle and high
schools, eligibility may be calculated on the basis of comparable data
from feeder schools. Eligibility as a High-Need School under this
definition is determined on the basis of the most currently available
data.
Human Capital Management System (HCMS) means a system--
(A) By which a LEA makes and implements human capital decisions,
such as decisions on preparation, recruitment, hiring, placement,
retention, dismissal, compensation, professional development, tenure,
and promotion; and
(B) That includes a Performance-Based Compensation System. (ESEA
section 2211(b)(3))
Large Sample means an analytic sample of 350 or more students (or
other single analysis units), or 50 or more groups (such as classrooms
or schools) that each contain, on average, 10 or more students (or
other single analysis units, regardless of whether these single
analysis units are disaggregated in the analysis of outcomes for the
groups). Multiple studies can cumulatively meet the Multi-Site Sample
and Large Sample requirements of Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence,
as long as each study meets the other requirements of the particular
level of evidence (i.e., Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence).
Logic Model (also known as a theory of action) means a reasonable
conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key components and
outcomes.
Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without
Reservations is the highest possible rating for a study finding
reviewed by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). Studies receiving this
rating provide the highest degree of confidence that an estimated
effect was caused by the project component studied. Experimental
studies (as defined above) may receive this highest rating. These
standards are described in the WWC Procedures and Standards Handbooks,
Version 3.0, which can be accessed at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with Reservations
is the second-highest rating for a group design study reviewed by the
WWC. Studies receiving this rating provide a reasonable degree of
confidence that an estimated effect was caused by the project component
studied. Both Experimental Studies (such as Randomized Controlled
Trials with high rates of sample attrition) and Quasi-Experimental
Design Studies (as defined below) may receive this rating if they
establish the equivalence of the treatment and comparison groups in key
baseline characteristics. These standards are described in the WWC
Procedures and Standards Handbooks, Version 3.0, which can be accessed
at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks.
Moderate Evidence means the following conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one Experimental or Quasi-Experimental Design
Study of the effectiveness of the project component with a Relevant
Finding that Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards With or
without Reservations (e.g., a Quasi-Experimental Design Study or high-
attrition Randomized Controlled Trial that establishes the equivalence
of the treatment and comparison groups in student achievement at
baseline);
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is of a statistically significant and positive (i.e.,
favorable) effect on a student outcome or other Relevant Outcome, with
no statistically significant and overriding negative (i.e.,
unfavorable) evidence on that project component from other findings
reviewed by and reported in the What Works Clearinghouse that Meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with or without Reservations;
(c) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is based on a sample that overlaps with the populations
(e.g., the types of student served) or settings proposed to receive the
project component (e.g., an after-school program studied in urban high
schools and proposed for rural high schools); and
(d) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is based on a Large Sample and a Multi-Site Sample.
Multi-Site Sample means more than one site, where site can be
defined as a local educational agency (LEA), locality, or State. A
sample could be multi-site if it includes campuses in two or more
localities (e.g., cities or counties), even if the campuses all belong
to the same LEA or postsecondary school system. Multiple studies can
cumulatively meet the Multi-Site Sample and Large Sample requirements
of Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence, as long as each study meets
the other requirements of the particular level of evidence (i.e.
Moderate Evidence or Strong Evidence).
Performance-Based Compensation System (PBCS) means a system of
compensation for teachers, principals, or other School Leaders--
(A) That differentiates levels of compensation based in part on
measurable increases in student academic achievement; and
[[Page 92798]]
(B) Which may include--
(i) Differentiated levels of compensation, which may include bonus
pay, on the basis of the employment responsibilities and success of
effective teachers, principals, or other School Leaders in hard-to-
staff schools or high-need subject areas; and
(ii) Recognition of the skills and knowledge of teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders as demonstrated through--
(I) Successful fulfillment of additional responsibilities or job
functions, such as teacher leadership roles; and
(II) Evidence of professional achievement and mastery of content
knowledge and superior teaching and leadership skills. (ESEA section
2211(b)(4))
Project Component means an activity, strategy, or intervention
included in a project. Evidence may pertain to an individual project
component, or to a combination of project components (e.g., training
teachers on instructional practices for English learners and follow-on
coaching for these teachers).
Promising Evidence means the following conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one study that is a Correlational Study with
Statistical Controls for selection bias with a Relevant Finding; and
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is of a statistically significant and positive (i.e.,
favorable) effect of the Project Component on a student outcome or
other Relevant Outcome with no statistically significant and overriding
negative (i.e., unfavorable) evidence on that Project Component from
other findings on the intervention reviewed by and reported in the What
Works Clearinghouse that Meets What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards with or without Reservations.
Quasi-Experimental Design Study (QED) means a study using a design
that attempts to approximate an Experimental Design by identifying a
comparison group that is similar to the treatment group in important
respects. This type of study, depending on design and implementation,
can Meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with Reservations
(but not without Reservations).
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) means a study that employs random
assignment of, for example, students, teachers, classrooms, or schools,
to receive the Project Component being evaluated (the treatment group)
or not to receive the Project Component (the control group). The
estimated effectiveness of the Project Component is the difference
between the average outcomes for the treatment group and for the
control group. These studies, depending on design and implementation,
can Meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without
Reservations.
Regression Discontinuity Design Study (RDD) means a study that
assigns the Project Component being evaluated using a measured variable
(e.g., assigning students reading below a cutoff score to tutoring or
developmental education classes) and controls for that variable in the
analysis of outcomes. The effectiveness of the Project Component is
estimated for individuals who barely qualify to receive that component.
These studies, depending on design and implementation, can Meet What
Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without Reservations.
Relevant Finding means a finding from a study regarding the
relationship between (A) an activity, strategy, or intervention
included as a component of the Logic Model for the proposed project,
and (B) a student outcome or other Relevant Outcome included in the
Logic Model for the proposed project.
Relevant Outcome means the student outcome(s) (or the ultimate
outcome if not related to students) the proposed Project Component is
designed to improve, consistent with the specific goals of a program.
School Leader means a principal, assistant principal, or other
individual who is:
(A) An employee or officer of an elementary school or secondary
school, LEA, or other entity operating an elementary school or
secondary school; and
(B) Responsible for the daily instructional leadership and
managerial operations in the elementary school or secondary school
building. (ESEA section 8101(44))
School Leader Residency Program means a school-based principal or
other School Leader preparation program in which a prospective
principal or other school leader--
(A) For one academic year, engages in sustained and rigorous
clinical learning with substantial leadership responsibilities and an
opportunity to practice and be evaluated in an authentic school
setting; and
(B) During that academic year--
(i) Participates in Evidence-Based coursework, to the extent the
State (in consultation with LEAs in the State) determines that such
evidence is reasonably available, that is integrated with the clinical
residency experience; and
(ii) Receives ongoing support from a mentor principal or other
school leader, who is effective. (ESEA section 2002(1))
Single-case Design Study (SCD) means a study that uses observations
of a single case (e.g., a student eligible for a behavioral
intervention) over time in the absence and presence of a controlled
treatment manipulation to determine whether the outcome is
systematically related to the treatment. According to the WWC Single
Case Design Pilot Standards, a collection of these studies, depending
on design and implementation (e.g., including a sufficient number of
cases and of data points per condition), can Meet What Works
Clearinghouse Evidence Standards without Reservations.
Strong Evidence means the following conditions are met:
(a) There is at least one Experimental Study (e.g., a Randomized
Controlled Trial) of the effectiveness of the Project Component that
has a Relevant Finding that Meets the What Works Clearinghouse Evidence
Standards without Reservations (e.g., a randomized controlled trial
with low rates of sample attrition overall and between the treatment
and control groups);
(b) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is of a statistically significant and positive (i.e.,
favorable) effect on a student outcome or other Relevant Outcome, with
no statistically significant and overriding negative (i.e.,
unfavorable) evidence on that Project Component from other findings
that Meet What Works Clearinghouse Evidence Standards with or without
Reservations;
(c) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is based on a sample that overlaps with the populations
(e.g., the types of student served) and settings proposed to receive
the Project Component (e.g., an after-school program both studied in,
and proposed for, urban high schools); and
(d) The Relevant Finding in the study described in paragraph (a) of
this definition is based on a Large Sample and a Multi-Site Sample.
Teacher Residency Program means a school-based teacher preparation
program in which a prospective teacher--
(A) For not less than one academic year, teaches alongside an
effective teacher, as determined by the State or LEA, who is the
teacher of record for the classroom;
(B) Receives concurrent instruction during the year described in
subparagraph (A)--
[[Page 92799]]
(i) Through courses that may be taught by LEA personnel or by
faculty of the teacher preparation program; and
(ii) In the teaching of the content area in which the teacher will
become certified or licensed; and
(C) Acquires effective teaching skills, as demonstrated through
completion of a residency program, or other measure determined by the
State, which may include a teacher performance assessment. (ESEA
section 2002(5))
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, definitions, and
requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary
to exempt from rulemaking requirements, regulations governing the first
grant competition under a new or substantially revised program
authority. This is the first grant competition under sections 2211-2213
of the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA, and therefore qualifies for this
exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards, the Secretary has
decided to forego public comment on the priorities, requirements, and
definitions under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These priorities,
requirements, and definitions will apply to the FY 17 grant competition
and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition.
Program Authority: Sections 2211-13 of the ESEA.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in (EDGAR) 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82,
84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension
(Non-procurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $159 million.
For FY 2017, the Administration has requested $250,000,000 under
TSL. We intend to use an estimated $159,000,000 of this funding for new
awards under this competition. The actual level of funding, if any,
depends on final congressional action. However, we are inviting
applications now to allow enough time to complete the grant process if
Congress appropriates funds for this program. Contingent upon the
availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make
additional awards in future years from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $500,000-$12,000,000 for the first year
of the project period.
Note: The Department estimates a wide range of awards given the
potentially large differences in the scope of funded projects,
including the size and number of participating LEAs.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $10,000,000 for the first year of
the project period. Funding for the second through fifth years of the
project period is subject to the availability of funds and the approval
of continuation awards (see 34 CFR 75.253).
Estimated Number of Awards: 15-20.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months, with renewal of up two additional
years if the grantee demonstrates to the Secretary that the grantee is
effectively using funds. Such renewal may include allowing the grantee
to scale up or replicate the successful program. Consistent with ESEA
section 2212(b)(3), a grantee may receive a TSL grant (whether
individually or as part of a consortium or partnership) only twice.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
(a) An LEA, including a charter school that is an LEA, or a
consortium of LEAs.
(b) An SEA or other State agency designated by the Chief Executive
of a State to participate.
(c) The Bureau of Indian Education; or
(d) A partnership consisting of--
(i) One or more agencies described in subparagraph (a), (b), or
(c); and
(ii) At least one nonprofit organization as defined in 2 CFR 200.70
or at least one for-profit entity.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching:
a. Matching: Under section 2212(f) of the ESEA, each grant
recipient must provide, from non-Federal sources an amount equal to 50
percent of the amount of the grant (which may be provided in cash or in
kind) to carry out the activities supported by the grant. Each
applicant will be required to provide a signed assurance attesting to
its intent and ability to meet the matching requirement.
b. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. In accordance with section 2212(g) of
the ESEA, funds made available under this program must be used to
supplement, and not supplant, other Federal or State funds that would
otherwise be expended to carry out activities under this program. The
Secretary considers all schools funded by the Department of Interior's
Bureau of Indian Education to be LEAs, and the funds that these schools
receive from the Department of Interior's annual appropriation to be
neither Federal nor State funds. Further, the prohibition against
supplanting also means that grantees seeking to charge indirect costs
to TSL funds will need to use their negotiated restricted indirect cost
rates. See 34 CFR 75.563.
3. Other: Application Requirements:
All applicants must meet the following application requirements in
order to be considered for funding. The application requirements are
from ESEA section 2212(c).
Each eligible applicant desiring a grant under this program must
submit an application that contains--
(a) A description of the PBCS or HCMS that the eligible applicant
proposes to develop, implement, improve, or expand through the grant;
(b) A description of the most significant gaps or insufficiencies
in student access to effective teachers, principals, or other School
Leaders in High-Need Schools, as applicable to the proposed project,
including gaps or inequities in how effective teachers, principals, or
other School Leaders are distributed across the LEA, as identified
using factors such as data on school resources, staffing patterns,
school environment, educator support systems, and other school-level
factors;
(c) A description and evidence of the support and commitment from
teachers, principals, or other School Leaders, as applicable to the
proposed project, which may include charter school leaders, in the
school (including organizations representing teachers, principals, or
other school leaders), the community, and the LEA to the activities
proposed under the grant;
(d) A description of how the eligible applicant will develop and
implement a fair, rigorous, valid, reliable, and objective process to
evaluate teacher, principal, or other school leader performance, as
applicable to the proposed project, under the system that is based in
part on measures of student academic achievement, including the
baseline performance against which evaluations of improved performance
will be made;
(e) A description of the LEAs or schools to be served under the
grant, including student academic
[[Page 92800]]
achievement, demographic, and socioeconomic information as identified
in the application package for this program;
(f) A description of the effectiveness of teachers, principals, or
other School Leaders, as applicable to the proposed project, in the LEA
or LEAs and the schools to be served under the grant, and the extent to
which the system will increase the effectiveness of teachers,
principals, or other School Leaders in such schools;
(g) A description of how the eligible applicant will use grant
funds in each year of the grant, including a timeline for
implementation of key grant activities;
(h) A description of how the eligible applicant will continue the
activities assisted under the grant after the grant period ends;
(i) A description of the State, local, or other public or private
funds that will be used to supplement the grant, including funds under
Title II, part A of the ESEA, and sustain the activities assisted under
the grant after the end of the grant period;
(j) A description of the rationale for the project; how the
proposed activities are evidence-based; and if applicable the prior
experience of the eligible entity in developing and implementing such
activities.
Note: In order to demonstrate that the activities are evidence-
based, an applicant may, among other things, provide supporting
documentation for the study or studies that serve as the evidence
base for one or more of the activities that will be implemented as
part of the proposed project. Additionally, we encourage applicants
to demonstrate in their application that at least one of the
activities to be implemented as part of their proposed project is
based on Promising Evidence (as defined in this notice). In recent
years, the TIF program has released various reports that document
the value of, and explore the implementation of, an HCMS \7\ that
includes a PBCS.\8\ In addition, other recent research also explores
TSL-type activities. We encourage applicants to include evidence-
based activities when considering the full set of TSL activities,
such as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Springer, M.G., Ballou, D., & Peng, A. (2008) Impact of the
Teacher Advancement Program on student test score gains: Findings
from an independent appraisal.'' Nashville: National Center for
Performance Incentives.
\8\ Chiang, H., Wellington, A., Hallgren, K., Speroni, C.,
Herrmann, M., Glazerman, S., and Constantine, J. (2015). Evaluation
of Teacher Incentive Fund: Implementation and impacts of pay-for-
performance after two years (NCEE 2015-4020). Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Educator preparation \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Silva, Tim, Allison McKie, Virginia Knechtel, Philip
Gleason, Libby Makowsky. (2014, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20154015/) Teaching Residency Programs: A Multisite Look
at a New Model to Prepare Teachers for High-Need Schools (NCEE 2015-
4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and
Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.
Department of Education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recruitment
Educator Induction \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Glazerman, S., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A.,
Isenberg, E., Lugo-Gil, J., Grider, M., & Britton, E. (2008).
Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first
year of a randomized controlled study (NCEE 2009-4034) (available at
https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/67264. Washington, DC: National
Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute
of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retention \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Allen, J.P., Pianta, R.C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A.Y., &
Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary
school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045),
1034-1037 (available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852503); New findings on the retention of novice teachers from
teaching residency programs Extending work from earlier study.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mentoring \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Allen, J.P., Pianta, R.C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A.Y., &
Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary
school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045),
1034-1037.
(k) A description of how grant activities will be evaluated,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
monitored, and reported to the public.
Note: In addition, under 34 CFR 75.591, all TSL grantees must
cooperate in any evaluation of the program conducted by the
Department.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: Orman Feres, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 453-6921 4W109,
Washington, DC 20202-6200. Telephone: (202) 453-6921 or by email:
TSL@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the program contact person listed in
this section.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content and form of an application, together with the
forms you must submit, are in the application package for this program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: We will be able to develop a more
efficient process for reviewing grant applications if we can anticipate
the number of applicants that intend to apply for funding under this
competition. Therefore, we strongly encourage each potential applicant
to notify us of the applicant's intent to submit an application for
funding by sending a short email message. This short email should
provide (1) the applicant organization's name and address; and (2) all
priorities the applicant intends to address. Please send this email
notification to TSL@ed.gov with ``Intent to Apply'' in the email
subject line. Applicants that do not provide this email notification
may still apply for funding and are not required to, or prohibited
from, addressing priorities they do not mention in their notice of
intent to apply.
Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. Applicants should limit the application narrative to no
more than 40 pages, using the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Calibri, or Arial.
The suggested page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes,
the bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the suggested
page limit does apply to all of the application narrative.
b. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for TSL, an application
may include business information that the applicant considers
proprietary. The Department's regulations define ``business
information'' in 34 CFR 5.11.
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application,
[[Page 92801]]
under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page number or
numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: December 20, 2016.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: February 4, 2017.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: March 24, 2017.
Pre-application workshops will be held for this competition shortly
after the date that this notice will publish. The workshops are
intended to provide technical assistance to all interested grant
applicants. Detailed information regarding the pre-application
workshops times, and online registration form, can be found on the TSL
Web site at: https://innovation.ed.gov/what-we-do/teacher-quality/teacher-incentive-fund/.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in paper format by mail or hand delivery
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to Other Submission Requirements in section
IV of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: April 23, 2017.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM), the Government's primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet at the
following Web site: https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. A DUNS number can be
created within one to two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow two to five weeks for your TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the
completeness and accuracy of the data you enter into the SAM database.
Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal financial
assistance under a program administered by the Department, please allow
sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number and TIN. We
strongly recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active, it may be 24 to 48
hours before you can access the information in, and submit an
application through, Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/web/grants/register.html.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an exception to this requirement
in accordance with the instructions in this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications.
Applications for grants under TSL, CFDA number 84.374A, must be
submitted electronically using the Government-wide Grants.gov Apply
site at www.Grants.gov. Through this site, you will be able to download
a copy of the application package, complete it offline, and then upload
and submit your application. You may not email an electronic copy of a
grant application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the TSL
competition at www.Grants.gov.You must search for the downloadable
application package for this program by the CFDA number. Do not include
the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g., search for 84.374,
not 84.374A).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does
[[Page 92802]]
not comply with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your
application from Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting
your application because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this program to ensure that you
submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system.
You can also find the Education Submission Procedures pertaining to
Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 system home
page at www.G5.gov. In addition, for specific guidance and procedures
for submitting an application through Grants.gov, please refer to the
Grants.gov Web site at: www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants/apply-for-grants.html.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: the
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a read-only, non-modifiable
Portable Document Format (PDF). Do not upload an interactive or
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only,
non-modifiable PDF (e.g., Word, Excel, WordPerfect, etc.) or submit a
password-protected file, we will not review that material. Please note
that this could result in your application not being considered for
funding because the material in question--for example, the application
narrative--is critical to a meaningful review of your proposal. For
that reason it is important to allow yourself adequate time to upload
all material as PDF files. The Department will not convert material
from other formats to PDF.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department. Grants.gov
will also notify you automatically by email if your application met all
the Grants.gov validation requirements or if there were any errors
(such as submission of your application by someone other than a
registered Authorized Organization Representative, or inclusion of an
attachment with a file name that contains special characters). You will
be given an opportunity to correct any errors and resubmit, but you
must still meet the deadline for submission of applications.
Once your application is successfully validated by Grants.gov, the
Department will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send you
an email with a unique PR/Award number for your application.
These emails do not mean that your application is without any
disqualifying errors. While your application may have been successfully
validated by Grants.gov, it must also meet the Department's application
requirements as specified in this notice and in the application
instructions. Disqualifying errors could include, for instance, failure
to upload attachments in a read-only, non-modifiable PDF; failure to
submit a required part of the application; or failure to meet applicant
eligibility requirements. It is your responsibility to ensure that your
submitted application has met all of the Department's requirements.
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that the
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. We will
contact you after we determine whether your application will be
accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevents you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Orman Feres, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W109,
[[Page 92803]]
Washington, DC 20202-6200. FAX: (202) 260-8969.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.374A), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with
your local post office.
We will not consider applications postmarked after the application
deadline date.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.374A), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7039, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except Saturdays,
Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: We are establishing the selection criterion
``The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a rationale''
and criterion (c)(3) for the FY 2017 grant competition only, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). The
other selection criteria for this program are from 34 CFR 75.210.
The maximum score for all the selection criteria is 100 points. The
maximum score for each criterion is indicated in parentheses. The
selection criteria for this competition are as follows:
(a) Evidence of Support(30 points).
In determining evidence of support of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed project is part of a
comprehensive effort to improve teaching and learning and support
rigorous academic standards for students.
(2) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for
maximizing the effectiveness of project services.
(3) The extent to which the proposed project will integrate with or
build on similar or related efforts to improve relevant outcomes (as
defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)), using existing funding streams from other
programs or policies supported by community, State, and Federal
resources.
(b) Need for Project (25 points).
In determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed project will provide services
or otherwise address the needs of students at risk of educational
failure.
(2) The extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
(c) Quality of the Project Design (20 points).
In determining the quality of the project design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a
rationale.
(2) The extent to which the design of the proposed project is
appropriate to, and will successfully address, the needs of the target
population or other identified needs.
(3) The extent to which the grant activities will be evaluated,
monitored, and reported to the public.
(d) Quality of the management plan (20 points).
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of the management plan to
achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project tasks.
(e) Adequacy of resources (5 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project based on the following factors:
(1) The potential for continued support of the project after
Federal funding ends, including, as appropriate, the demonstrated
commitment of appropriate entities to such support.
(2) The potential for the incorporation of project purposes,
activities, or benefits into the ongoing program of the agency of
organization at the end of the Federal funding.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Education
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Special Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
[[Page 92804]]
this program the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may impose special
conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other
management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200,
subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is
otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$150,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through SAM. You may review and comment on any
information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
(d) By reporting on these performance measures in annual and final
performance reports, grantees will satisfy the requirement in Section
8101 (21)(A)(ii)(II) of the ESEA, as amended, for projects relying on
the ``demonstrates a rationale'' evidence level, to have ``ongoing
efforts to examine the effects'' of the funded activity, strategy, or
intervention.
4. Performance Measures: Pursuant to the Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993, the Department has established the following
performance measures that it will use to evaluate the overall
effectiveness of the grantee's project, as well as the TIF program as a
whole:
(a) The percentage of Educators in all schools who earned
Performance-Based Compensation.
(b) The percentage of Educators in all High-Need Schools who earned
Performance-Based Compensation.
(c) The gap between the retention rate of Educators receiving
Performance-Based Compensation and the average retention rate of
Educators in each High-Need School whose Educators participate in the
project.
(d) The number of school districts participating in a TSL grant
that use Educator Evaluation and Support Systems to inform the
following human capital decisions: recruitment; hiring; placement;
retention; dismissal; professional development; tenure; promotion; or
all of the above.
(e) The number of High-Need Schools within districts participating
in a TSL grant that use Educator Evaluation and Support Systems to
inform the following human capital decisions: recruitment; hiring;
placement; retention; dismissal; professional development; tenure;
promotion; or all of the above.
(f) The percentage of Performance-Based Compensation paid to
Educators with State, local, or other non-TIF Federal resources.
(g) The percentage of teachers and principals who receive the
highest effectiveness rating.
(h) The percentage of teachers and principals in High-Needs Schools
who receive the highest effectiveness rating.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Orman Feres, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4W109, Washington, DC 20202-
6200. Telephone: (202) 453-6921 or by email: TSL@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD or a TTY, call the FRS, toll free, at 1-800-877-
8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is
[[Page 92805]]
the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to
the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at:
www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or PDF. To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat
Reader, which is available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Nadya Chinoy Dabby,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Office of Innovation and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 2016-30643 Filed 12-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P