Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 84601-84603 [2016-28211]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology,
Physiology, and Biological Chemistry
Research; 93.862, Genetics and
Developmental Biology Research; 93.88,
Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96,
Special Minority Initiatives; 93.859,
Biomedical Research and Research Training,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: November 17, 2016.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–28149 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meetings
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meetings.
The meetings will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflict: AIDS and Related Research.
Date: December 5–6, 2016.
Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person: Kenneth A Roebuck, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5106,
MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1166, roebuckk@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Social
Sciences and Population Studies: Special
Topics.
Date: December 8, 2016.
Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
Contact Person: Kate Fothergill, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3142,
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–2309,
fothergillke@mail.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member
Conflict: AIDS and AIDS Related Research.
Date: December 9, 2016.
Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institute of Health, 6701
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Telephone Conference Call).
Contact Person: Jose H Guerrier, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5218,
MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
1137, guerriej@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS).
Dated: November 17, 2016.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–28143 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Cancer Institute; Amended
Notice of Meeting
Notice is hereby given of a change in
the meeting of the National Cancer
Institute Special Emphasis Panel,
November 18, 2016, 03:00 p.m. to
November 18, 2016, 05:00 p.m.,
National Cancer Institute Shady Grove,
9609 Medical Center Drive, 3W030,
Rockville, MD 20850 which was
published in the Federal Register on
October 17, 2016, 81 FR 71516.
The meeting notice is amended to
change the date and time from
November 18, 2016, 3:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m.
to December 15, 2016, 12:30 p.m.–2:30
p.m. The meeting is closed to the
public.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84601
Dated: November 17, 2016.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–28144 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 concerning
opportunity for public comment on
proposed collections of information, the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA)
will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more
information on the proposed projects or
to obtain a copy of the information
collection plans, call the SAMHSA
Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276–
1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the
Cooperative Agreements to Benefit
Homeless Individuals (CABHI) Program
(OMB No. 0930–0339)—REVISION
SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site
evaluation of the FY2016 cohort of the
CABHI grant program. The CABHI
Evaluation builds on a previous
evaluation of SAMHSA’s 2009–2012
homeless services grant programs (i.e.,
Grants for the Benefit of Homeless
Individuals, Services in Supportive
Housing, and CABHI), under which the
approved data collection tools were
developed and implemented. SAMHSA
is requesting approval from OMB to
revise the burden inventory, which has
been calculated based on the number of
FY2016 CABHI grantees, and to modify
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
84602
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
the data collection mode of a project
director interview.
In 2016, SAMHSA awarded 30 CABHI
grants across three levels: States (up to
$1.5 million per year), Local
Governments (up to $800,000 per year),
and Communities (up to $400,000 per
year). The grantees are united by the
goal of enhancing and expanding
infrastructure and capacity for mental
health and substance abuse treatment
and related support services for
individuals experiencing chronic
homelessness or veterans, families, or
youth experiencing homelessness as a
result of these conditions. This is
accomplished through the provision of
permanent supportive housing,
behavioral health treatment, and
recovery support services, and
enrollment in health insurance,
Medicaid, or other mainstream benefit
programs.
The primary task of the CABHI
evaluation is to conduct a
comprehensive process and outcome
evaluation, addressing questions related
to the implementation of the CABHI
grant projects and the extent to which
they were able to meet the program’s
goals. Process evaluation primarily
represents what is done to and for the
client (e.g., services provided); this
aspect of the evaluation will also
include a focus on structure, or the
resources available in the service
delivery system, which represent the
capacity to deliver quality care, but not
the care itself. The outcome evaluation
will focus on outputs, which are the
most immediate or proximal results of
project activities (e.g., changes in
partner collaboration, the number of
clients enrolled in mainstream benefits),
and client outcomes, particularly those
related to behavioral health and
homelessness and housing instability.
The data collection tools included in
this request collect a wide range of
quantitative and qualitative data on
characteristics of the grantee
organization and its partnerships; the
system within which the project is
embedded; relationships with
stakeholders; characteristics of the target
population; services received, including
implementation of EBPs; staffing
patterns; costs of services; barriers and
facilitators of project implementation;
and project sustainability efforts. Data
collection efforts that will support the
evaluation are described below.
The Project Director (PD) Phone
Interview/Web Survey is designed to
systematically collect key grant project
characteristics which will directly
inform the process evaluation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
component and will also provide
essential data by documenting the
partnerships and services each grantee
includes in their project. The interview
includes two components, a semistructured telephone interview and a
Web survey, which represents a change
from the original approval. The
interview was developed to be
conducted as a telephone interview;
however, some sections are better suited
for self-administration through a Webbased survey (e.g., reporting which
services the project is providing to
clients) and the instrument has been
modified accordingly. The PD Phone
Interview/Web Survey is composed of
the following sections: Grantee Agency
and Project Characteristics, Target
Population, Stakeholders/Partners,
Services, Evidence-Based Practices
(EBPs), Housing, Project Organization
and Implementation, Sustainability,
Local Evaluation, Technical Assistance,
and Lessons Learned. A total of 39
respondents are expected to complete
the PD Phone Interview/Web Survey;
this includes one respondent from all of
the CABHI grantees (n=30) and the State
sub-recipients (n=9). This data
collection will occur one time during
Year 1 and one time during Year 3 of the
evaluation.
Site Visits will consist of in-person,
semi-structured discussions with grant
project directors, State sub-recipient
coordinators, project evaluators,
financial staff, behavioral health
treatment staff, case managers, housing
providers, other support services staff,
primary partner staff and other key
stakeholders, and project client
participants. The purpose of the Site
Visits is to collect detailed qualitative
information and economic data on
project activities conducted by the
grantees and their partners, which will
directly inform the process evaluation.
The qualitative data will also provide
essential information for the outcome
evaluation component by documenting
the interventions provided to clients
and the implementation, barriers,
facilitators, challenges and successes for
each grant project visited. Each CABHI
grant project (n=30) will be visited once
during Year 2 and once during Year 3
of the evaluation. No changes have been
made to the Site Visit instruments.
The EBP Self-Assessment is a Webbased survey designed to collect
information on the services
implemented in CABHI grant projects
that have a demonstrable evidence base,
providing a description of the EBP
interventions received by project
clients. The EBP Self-Assessment tool is
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
divided into two parts. Part 1 collects
information on general implementation
of the projects’ primary EBPs (i.e., those
received by the most project clients).
Thirty-six respondents (9 State subrecipients, 12 Local Governments, and
15 Communities) are expected to
complete Part 1 of the EBP SelfAssessment, which may be completed
up to 3 times based on the number of
primary EBPs being implemented by the
project. Part 2 collects detailed
implementation data on a selected
group of EBPs (i.e., Assertive
Community Treatment, Integrated Dual
Disorders Treatment, Illness
Management and Recovery, Supported
Employment, Critical Time
Intervention, and Supplemental
Security Income [SSI]/Social Security
Disability Insurance [SSDI] Outreach,
Access, and Recovery) and will be
administered only to projects using the
selected EBPs and only for the EBPs
they are implementing. Thirty-six
respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12
Local Governments, and 15
Communities) are expected to complete
Part 2 of the EBP Self-Assessment,
which may be completed up to 3 times
based on the number of Part 2 EBPs
being implemented by the project.
Respondents for both Part 1 and 2 may
include grant project directors, State
sub-recipient coordinators, or other staff
knowledgeable about the project’s EBPs.
The EBP Self-Assessment will be
administered in Year 2 of the
evaluation. No changes have been made
to the EBP Self-Assessment instrument.
The Permanent Supportive Housing
(PSH) Self-Assessment is a Web-based
survey completed by the CABHI grant
projects to understand the extent to
which they are implementing key
dimensions of PSH and capture the
variability of the PSH model among the
projects. Information is collected on the
following dimensions: Choice of
housing, separation of housing and
services; decent, safe, and affordable
housing; housing integration; tenancy
rights; access to housing; flexible,
voluntary services; service philosophy;
and team-based behavioral health.
Thirty-six respondents (9 State subrecipients, 12 Local Governments, and
15 Communities) are expected to
complete the PSH Self-Assessment one
time, and may include grant project
directors, State sub-recipient
coordinators, or other staff
knowledgeable about the project’s PSH
model. The PSH Self-Assessment will be
administered in Year 2 of the
evaluation. No changes have been made
to the PSH Self-Assessment instrument.
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
84603
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 23, 2016 / Notices
ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Instrument/activity
PD Phone Interview/Web Survey ........................................
Site Visits:
Opening Session/Project Director Interview .................
Case Manager, Treatment, Housing Staff/Provider
Interview ....................................................................
Stakeholder Interview ...................................................
Evaluator Interview .......................................................
Client Focus Group .......................................................
Cost Interview ...............................................................
Evidence-Based Practice Self-Assessment Part 1 ..............
Evidence-Based Practice Self-Assessment Part 2 ..............
Permanent Supportive Housing Self-Assessment ...............
Total .......................................................................
Responses
per
respondent
Total
number of
responses
Hours per
response
Total
burden hours
39
1
39
2.1
82
a 300
1
300
2.5
750
b 540
36
36
36
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
540
270
60
450
60
108
108
36
2
1.5
1
1.5
2
0.58
0.25
0.67
1,080
405
60
675
120
63
27
24
g 1,650
........................
1,971
........................
3,286
c 270
d 60
e 450
f 60
respondents × 30 site visits = 300 respondents.
b 18 respondents × 30 site visits = 540 respondents.
c 9 respondents × 30 site visits = 270 respondents.
d 2 respondents × 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
e 15 respondents × 30 site visits = 450 respondents.
f 2 respondents × 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
g This is an unduplicated count of total respondents.
a 10
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57–B,
Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy
to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
by January 23, 2017.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016–28211 Filed 11–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID: FEMA–2016–0006; OMB No.
1660–0006]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; National
Flood Insurance Program Policy Forms
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) will
submit the information collection
abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
clearance in accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The submission
will describe the nature of the
information collection, the categories of
respondents, the estimated burden (i.e.,
the time, effort and resources used by
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Nov 22, 2016
Jkt 241001
respondents to respond) and cost, and
the actual data collection instruments
FEMA will use.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before December 23, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the proposed information collection
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget. Comments
should be addressed to the Desk Officer
for the Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via
electronic mail to oira.submission@
omb.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
should be made to Director, Records
Management Division, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472–3100, or email
address FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal
Register on March 27, 2016 at 81 FR
14459 with a 60 day public comment
period. No comments were received.
The purpose of this notice is to notify
the public that FEMA will submit the
information collection abstracted below
to the Office of Management and Budget
for review and clearance.
Collection of Information
Title: National Flood Insurance
Program Policy Forms.
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB Number: 1660–0006.
Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA
Form 086–0–1, Flood Insurance
Application; FEMA From 086–0–2,
Flood Insurance Cancellation/
Nullification Request Form; FEMA
Form 086–0–3, Flood Insurance General
Change Endorsement; FEMA Form 086–
0–4, V-Zone Risk Factor Rating Form
and Instructions; FEMA Form 086–0–5,
Flood Insurance Preferred Risk Policy
and Newly Mapped Application.
Abstract: In order to provide for the
availability of policies for flood
insurance, policies are marketed
through the facilities of licensed
insurance agents or brokers in the
various States. Applications from agents
or brokers are forwarded to a servicing
company designated as fiscal agent by
the Federal Insurance Administration.
Upon receipt and examination of the
application and required premium, the
servicing company issues the
appropriate Federal flood insurance
policy.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; State, local or Tribal
Government; Business or other for
profit; Not-for-profit institutions; and
Farms.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
601,067.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 91,016 hours.
Estimated Cost: The cost to
respondents is $6,500 for engineer or
architect services.
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84601-84603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28211]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 concerning opportunity for public comment on proposed
collections of information, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration (SAMHSA) will publish periodic summaries of
proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects
or to obtain a copy of the information collection plans, call the
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology.
Proposed Project: Evaluation of the Cooperative Agreements to Benefit
Homeless Individuals (CABHI) Program (OMB No. 0930-0339)--REVISION
SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site evaluation of the FY2016 cohort
of the CABHI grant program. The CABHI Evaluation builds on a previous
evaluation of SAMHSA's 2009-2012 homeless services grant programs
(i.e., Grants for the Benefit of Homeless Individuals, Services in
Supportive Housing, and CABHI), under which the approved data
collection tools were developed and implemented. SAMHSA is requesting
approval from OMB to revise the burden inventory, which has been
calculated based on the number of FY2016 CABHI grantees, and to modify
[[Page 84602]]
the data collection mode of a project director interview.
In 2016, SAMHSA awarded 30 CABHI grants across three levels: States
(up to $1.5 million per year), Local Governments (up to $800,000 per
year), and Communities (up to $400,000 per year). The grantees are
united by the goal of enhancing and expanding infrastructure and
capacity for mental health and substance abuse treatment and related
support services for individuals experiencing chronic homelessness or
veterans, families, or youth experiencing homelessness as a result of
these conditions. This is accomplished through the provision of
permanent supportive housing, behavioral health treatment, and recovery
support services, and enrollment in health insurance, Medicaid, or
other mainstream benefit programs.
The primary task of the CABHI evaluation is to conduct a
comprehensive process and outcome evaluation, addressing questions
related to the implementation of the CABHI grant projects and the
extent to which they were able to meet the program's goals. Process
evaluation primarily represents what is done to and for the client
(e.g., services provided); this aspect of the evaluation will also
include a focus on structure, or the resources available in the service
delivery system, which represent the capacity to deliver quality care,
but not the care itself. The outcome evaluation will focus on outputs,
which are the most immediate or proximal results of project activities
(e.g., changes in partner collaboration, the number of clients enrolled
in mainstream benefits), and client outcomes, particularly those
related to behavioral health and homelessness and housing instability.
The data collection tools included in this request collect a wide range
of quantitative and qualitative data on characteristics of the grantee
organization and its partnerships; the system within which the project
is embedded; relationships with stakeholders; characteristics of the
target population; services received, including implementation of EBPs;
staffing patterns; costs of services; barriers and facilitators of
project implementation; and project sustainability efforts. Data
collection efforts that will support the evaluation are described
below.
The Project Director (PD) Phone Interview/Web Survey is designed to
systematically collect key grant project characteristics which will
directly inform the process evaluation component and will also provide
essential data by documenting the partnerships and services each
grantee includes in their project. The interview includes two
components, a semi-structured telephone interview and a Web survey,
which represents a change from the original approval. The interview was
developed to be conducted as a telephone interview; however, some
sections are better suited for self-administration through a Web-based
survey (e.g., reporting which services the project is providing to
clients) and the instrument has been modified accordingly. The PD Phone
Interview/Web Survey is composed of the following sections: Grantee
Agency and Project Characteristics, Target Population, Stakeholders/
Partners, Services, Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs), Housing, Project
Organization and Implementation, Sustainability, Local Evaluation,
Technical Assistance, and Lessons Learned. A total of 39 respondents
are expected to complete the PD Phone Interview/Web Survey; this
includes one respondent from all of the CABHI grantees (n=30) and the
State sub-recipients (n=9). This data collection will occur one time
during Year 1 and one time during Year 3 of the evaluation.
Site Visits will consist of in-person, semi-structured discussions
with grant project directors, State sub-recipient coordinators, project
evaluators, financial staff, behavioral health treatment staff, case
managers, housing providers, other support services staff, primary
partner staff and other key stakeholders, and project client
participants. The purpose of the Site Visits is to collect detailed
qualitative information and economic data on project activities
conducted by the grantees and their partners, which will directly
inform the process evaluation. The qualitative data will also provide
essential information for the outcome evaluation component by
documenting the interventions provided to clients and the
implementation, barriers, facilitators, challenges and successes for
each grant project visited. Each CABHI grant project (n=30) will be
visited once during Year 2 and once during Year 3 of the evaluation. No
changes have been made to the Site Visit instruments.
The EBP Self-Assessment is a Web-based survey designed to collect
information on the services implemented in CABHI grant projects that
have a demonstrable evidence base, providing a description of the EBP
interventions received by project clients. The EBP Self-Assessment tool
is divided into two parts. Part 1 collects information on general
implementation of the projects' primary EBPs (i.e., those received by
the most project clients). Thirty-six respondents (9 State sub-
recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15 Communities) are expected to
complete Part 1 of the EBP Self-Assessment, which may be completed up
to 3 times based on the number of primary EBPs being implemented by the
project. Part 2 collects detailed implementation data on a selected
group of EBPs (i.e., Assertive Community Treatment, Integrated Dual
Disorders Treatment, Illness Management and Recovery, Supported
Employment, Critical Time Intervention, and Supplemental Security
Income [SSI]/Social Security Disability Insurance [SSDI] Outreach,
Access, and Recovery) and will be administered only to projects using
the selected EBPs and only for the EBPs they are implementing. Thirty-
six respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15
Communities) are expected to complete Part 2 of the EBP Self-
Assessment, which may be completed up to 3 times based on the number of
Part 2 EBPs being implemented by the project. Respondents for both Part
1 and 2 may include grant project directors, State sub-recipient
coordinators, or other staff knowledgeable about the project's EBPs.
The EBP Self-Assessment will be administered in Year 2 of the
evaluation. No changes have been made to the EBP Self-Assessment
instrument.
The Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Self-Assessment is a Web-
based survey completed by the CABHI grant projects to understand the
extent to which they are implementing key dimensions of PSH and capture
the variability of the PSH model among the projects. Information is
collected on the following dimensions: Choice of housing, separation of
housing and services; decent, safe, and affordable housing; housing
integration; tenancy rights; access to housing; flexible, voluntary
services; service philosophy; and team-based behavioral health. Thirty-
six respondents (9 State sub-recipients, 12 Local Governments, and 15
Communities) are expected to complete the PSH Self-Assessment one time,
and may include grant project directors, State sub-recipient
coordinators, or other staff knowledgeable about the project's PSH
model. The PSH Self-Assessment will be administered in Year 2 of the
evaluation. No changes have been made to the PSH Self-Assessment
instrument.
[[Page 84603]]
Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses per Total number Hours per Total burden
Instrument/activity respondents respondent of responses response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PD Phone Interview/Web Survey... 39 1 39 2.1 82
Site Visits:
Opening Session/Project \a\ 300 1 300 2.5 750
Director Interview.........
Case Manager, Treatment, \b\ 540 1 540 2 1,080
Housing Staff/Provider
Interview..................
Stakeholder Interview....... \c\ 270 1 270 1.5 405
Evaluator Interview......... \d\ 60 1 60 1 60
Client Focus Group.......... \e\ 450 1 450 1.5 675
Cost Interview.............. \f\ 60 1 60 2 120
Evidence-Based Practice Self- 36 3 108 0.58 63
Assessment Part 1..............
Evidence-Based Practice Self- 36 3 108 0.25 27
Assessment Part 2..............
Permanent Supportive Housing 36 1 36 0.67 24
Self-Assessment................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................... \g\ 1,650 .............. 1,971 .............. 3,286
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ 10 respondents x 30 site visits = 300 respondents.
\b\ 18 respondents x 30 site visits = 540 respondents.
\c\ 9 respondents x 30 site visits = 270 respondents.
\d\ 2 respondents x 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
\e\ 15 respondents x 30 site visits = 450 respondents.
\f\ 2 respondents x 30 site visits = 60 respondents.
\g\ This is an unduplicated count of total respondents.
Send comments to Summer King, SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57-B, Rockville, MD 20857 OR email a copy to
summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov. Written comments should be received by
January 23, 2017.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016-28211 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
