Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 41/2, 80635-80637 [2016-27519]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2016 / Notices closing period for their receipt is December 27, 2016. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Diane Finver at Diane.Finver@trade.gov or (202) 482–1367. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–117–2016] [S–159–2016] Foreign-Trade Zone 61—San Juan, Puerto Rico; Application for Subzone; ´ Aceros de America, Inc.; San Juan, Puerto Rico On August 9, 2016, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Mississippi Coast Foreign Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 92, requesting an additional site within Subzone 92B on behalf of Huntington Ingalls Industries. The existing subzone and the proposed site would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 92. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (81 FR 54041–54042, August 15, 2016). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 92B is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 92’s 2,000acre activation limit. An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Puerto Rico Trade & Export Company, grantee of FTZ 61, requesting subzone status for the facility ´ of Aceros de America, Inc., located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on November 10, 2016. The proposed subzone (4.49 acres) is located at State Road #1, km 25.0, Quebrada Arenas Ward, San Juan. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 61. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period for their receipt is December 27, 2016. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to January 10, 2017. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Camille Evans at Camille.Evans@ trade.gov or (202) 482–2350. Dated: November 8, 2016. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. Dated: November 10, 2016. Elizabeth Whiteman, Acting Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–27568 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. 2016–27574 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Dated: November 8, 2016. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–27571 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–112–2016] Approval of Expansion of Subzone 92B; Huntington Ingalls Industries; Pascagoula, Mississippi asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Nov 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 80635 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Approval of Subzone Status; ASICS America Corporation; Byhalia, Mississippi On August 16, 2016, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Northern Mississippi FTZ, Inc., grantee of FTZ 262, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 262, on behalf of ASICS America Corporation in Byhalia, Mississippi. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (81 FR 56582, August 22, 2016). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 262C is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 262’s 680acre activation limit. Dated: November 8, 2016. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–27570 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–588–850] Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 41⁄2 Inches) From Japan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014– 2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On July 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 41⁄2 inches) from Japan. The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015. The review covers five producers or exporters of AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 80636 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2016 / Notices subject merchandise. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. None were received. Accordingly, for the final results, we continue to find that that NKK Tubes (NKK) had no shipments during the POR. Further, we continue to find that subject merchandise has been sold in the United States at less than normal value by JFE Steel Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. (SMI). DATES: Effective November 16, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0189. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On July 12, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results of the administrative review.1 The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received no comments. The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 41⁄2 inches) from Japan, which is currently classified under subheading 7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, 7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, 7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, 7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, 7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60, 7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 1 See Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 45126 (July 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Nov 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive.2 Final Determination of No Shipments As noted in the Preliminary Results, the Department received a claim of no shipments from NKK. In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily found that NKK did not have reviewable entries during the POR. Additionally, the Department stated in the Preliminary Results that it was not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to NKK at that time, but rather complete the review with respect to NKK and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the final results. After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department received no comments from interested parties, and has not received any information that would cause it to alter its preliminary determination. Therefore, for these final results, the Department continues to find that NKK did not have any reviewable entries during the POR. all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review.3 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. We will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by NSSMC, and an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by the companies that were not selected for individual examination: JFE, NSC, and SMI.4 Additionally, because the Department determined that NKK had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, any suspended entries that entered under NKK’s AD case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the all-others rate effective during the period of review if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.5 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements Final Results of Review will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative Because the Department received no review for all shipments of certain large comments after the Preliminary Results diameter carbon and alloy seamless for consideration for these final results, standard, line, and pressure pipe (over we have made no changes to the 41⁄2 inches) from Japan entered, or Preliminary Results. As a result of this withdrawn from warehouse, for review, we determine that dumping consumption on or after the date of margins on certain large diameter publication, as provided by section carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 41⁄2 inches) 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be from Japan exist for the period June 1, the rates established in the final results 2014, through May 31, 2015, at the of this review; (2) for merchandise following rates: exported by manufacturers or exporters Margin not covered in this review but covered Producer and/or exporter (percent) in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the JFE Steel Corporation ................ 107.80 company-specific rate published for the Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation ............................. 107.80 most recently completed segment of this Nippon Steel Corporation ........... 107.80 proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a Sumitomo Metals Industries ....... 107.80 firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, Assessment the cash deposit rate will be the rate The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 2 For a full description of the scope of the order, merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter see the ‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty nor the manufacturer has its own rate, Order on Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy the cash deposit rate will continue to be Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 41⁄2 Inches) from Japan; 2014–2015 Administrative Review’’ from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated July 5, 2016, which can be accessed directly at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). Preliminary Decision Memorandum at section V.b ‘‘Rate for Non-Examined Companies’’ (for an explanation of how we preliminarily determined the rate for non-selected companies). 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 4 See E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1 80637 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 221 / Wednesday, November 16, 2016 / Notices 68.88 percent, the all-others rate established in the order.6 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: November 9, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–27519 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [Application No. 03–2A008] Export Trade Certificate of Review Notice of issuance of an amended Export Trade Certificate of ACTION: Review to California Pistachio Export Council (‘‘CPEC’’), Application No. 03– 2A008. The U.S. Department of Commerce issued an amended Export Trade Certificate of Review to CPEC on November 1, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Flynn, Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’), International Trade Administration, by telephone at (202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at etca@trade.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. The regulations implementing Title III are found at 15 CFR part 325 (2016). OTEA is issuing this notice pursuant to 15 CFR 325.6(b), which requires the Secretary of Commerce to publish a summary of the certification in the Federal Register. Under Section 305(a) of the Act and 15 CFR 325.11(a), any person aggrieved by the Secretary’s determination may, within 30 days of the date of this notice, bring an action in any appropriate district court of the United States to set aside the determination on the ground that the determination is erroneous. SUMMARY: Description of Amended Certificate CPEC’s Export Trade Certificate of Review has been amended to: 1. Add the following companies as Members of the Certificate: ARO Pistachios, Inc., and Zymex Industries, Inc. CPEC’s amendment of its Export Trade Certificate of Review results in the following membership list: (a) ARO Pistachios, Inc. (b) Keenan Farms, Inc. (c) Monarch Nut Company (d) Nichols Pistachio (e) Primex Farms, LLC (f) Setton Pistachio of Terra Bella, Inc. (g) Horizon Marketing Agency in Common Cooperative Inc. (h) Zymex Industries, Inc. Dated: November 9, 2016. Amanda Reynolds, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration. [FR Doc. 2016–27475 Filed 11–15–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: Background Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for December 2016 The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in December 2016 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Reviews (‘‘Sunset Reviews’’). asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Antidumping duty proceedings Department contact Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India (A–533–817) (3rd Review) .................... Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India (A–533–808) (4th Review) ............................................................ Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Indonesia (A–560–805) (3rd Review) ............ Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Republic of Korea (A–580–836) (3rd Review) David David David David Goldberger, Goldberger, Goldberger, Goldberger, (202) (202) (202) (202) 482–4136. 482–4136. 482–4136. 482–4136. Countervailing Duty Proceedings Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from India (C–533–818) (3rd Review) .................... Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from Indonesia (C–560–806) (3rd Review) ............ 6 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe from Japan; and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Nov 15, 2016 Jkt 241001 Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. the Republic of South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000). E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM 16NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80635-80637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-588-850]


Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, 
and Pressure Pipe (Over 4\1/2\ Inches) From Japan: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 12, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain large diameter carbon and alloy 
seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/2\ inches) from 
Japan. The period of review (POR) is June 1, 2014, through May 31, 
2015. The review covers five producers or exporters of

[[Page 80636]]

subject merchandise. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. None were received. Accordingly, for the final results, we 
continue to find that that NKK Tubes (NKK) had no shipments during the 
POR. Further, we continue to find that subject merchandise has been 
sold in the United States at less than normal value by JFE Steel 
Corporation (JFE), Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation (NSSMC), 
Nippon Steel Corporation (NSC), and Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. 
(SMI).

DATES: Effective November 16, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0189.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 12, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of the administrative review.\1\ The Department gave interested parties 
an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received no 
comments. The Department conducted this review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Large Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 45126 
(July 12, 2016) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is certain large diameter 
carbon and alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/
2\ inches) from Japan, which is currently classified under subheading 
7304.10.10.30, 7304.10.10.45, 7304.10.10.60, 7304.10.50.50, 
7304.19.10.30, 7304.19.10.45, 7304.19.10.60, 7304.19.50.50, 
7304.31.60.10, 7304.31.60.50, 7304.39.00.04, 7304.39.00.06, 
7304.39.00.08, 7304.39.00.36, 7304.39.00.40, 7304.39.00.44, 
7304.39.00.48, 7304.39.00.52, 7304.39.00.56, 7304.39.00.62, 
7304.39.00.68, 7304.39.00.72, 7304.51.50.15, 7304.51.50.45, 
7304.51.50.60, 7304.59.20.30, 7304.59.20.55, 7304.59.20.60, 
7304.59.20.70, 7304.59.60.00, 7304.59.80.30, 7304.59.80.35, 
7304.59.80.40, 7304.59.80.45, 7304.59.80.50, 7304.59.80.55, 
7304.59.80.60, 7304.59.80.65, and 7304.59.80.70 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise subject to the order is 
dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the 
``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of 
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Large Diameter Carbon and 
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe (Over 4\1/2\ 
Inches) from Japan; 2014-2015 Administrative Review'' from Gary 
Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated July 5, 
2016, which can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    As noted in the Preliminary Results, the Department received a 
claim of no shipments from NKK. In the Preliminary Results, the 
Department preliminarily found that NKK did not have reviewable entries 
during the POR. Additionally, the Department stated in the Preliminary 
Results that it was not appropriate to rescind the review with respect 
to NKK at that time, but rather complete the review with respect to NKK 
and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) based on the final results.
    After issuing the Preliminary Results, the Department received no 
comments from interested parties, and has not received any information 
that would cause it to alter its preliminary determination. Therefore, 
for these final results, the Department continues to find that NKK did 
not have any reviewable entries during the POR.

Final Results of Review

    Because the Department received no comments after the Preliminary 
Results for consideration for these final results, we have made no 
changes to the Preliminary Results. As a result of this review, we 
determine that dumping margins on certain large diameter carbon and 
alloy seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/2\ inches) 
from Japan exist for the period June 1, 2014, through May 31, 2015, at 
the following rates:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                  Producer and/or exporter                     (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JFE Steel Corporation.......................................      107.80
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation...................      107.80
Nippon Steel Corporation....................................      107.80
Sumitomo Metals Industries..................................      107.80
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance 
with the final results of this review.\3\ The Department intends to 
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of 
publication of these final results of review. We will instruct CBP to 
apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported 
by NSSMC, and an ad valorem assessment rate of 107.80 percent to all 
entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/
or exported by the companies that were not selected for individual 
examination: JFE, NSC, and SMI.\4\ Additionally, because the Department 
determined that NKK had no shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR, any suspended entries that entered under NKK's AD case number 
(i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the all-others 
rate effective during the period of review if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at section V.b ``Rate 
for Non-Examined Companies'' (for an explanation of how we 
preliminarily determined the rate for non-selected companies).
    \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of certain large diameter carbon and alloy seamless 
standard, line, and pressure pipe (over 4\1/2\ inches) from Japan 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) 
The cash deposit rates for the reviewed companies will be the rates 
established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of 
this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither 
the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will continue to be

[[Page 80637]]

68.88 percent, the all-others rate established in the order.\6\ These 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Large 
Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe 
from Japan; and Certain Small Diameter Carbon and Alloy Seamless 
Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe From Japan and the Republic of 
South Africa, 65 FR 39360 (June 26, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: November 9, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-27519 Filed 11-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P