Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 79558-79559 [2016-27274]
Download as PDF
79558
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2016 / Notices
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) and their
implementing regulations at 49 CFR part
556, Goodyear submitted a petition for
an exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of Goodyear’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 381 Goodyear G182 RSD
size 11R22.5 LR G commercial truck
tires manufactured between July 3,
2016, and August 20, 2016.
III. Noncompliance: Goodyear
explains that because the sidewall
markings on the reference side of the
subject tires incorrectly identify the
number of plies as ‘‘TREAD 4 PLIES
STEEL CORD’’ instead of the correct
labelling ‘‘TREAD 5 PLIES STEEL
CORD,’’ the tires do not meet the
requirements of paragraph S6.5(f) of
FMVSS No. 119.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5(f) of
FMVSS No. 119 provides, in pertinent
part:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
S6.5 Tire markings. Except as specified in
this paragraph, each tire shall be marked on
each sidewall with the information specified
in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section
. . .
(f) The actual number of plies and the
composition of the ply cord material in the
sidewall and, if different, in the tread area;
. . .
V. Summary of Goodyear’s Petition:
Goodyear described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, Goodyear
submitted the following:
Goodyear believes this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety because these tires
were manufactured as designed and
meet or exceed all applicable Federal
Motor Vehicles Safety performance
standards. All of the sidewall markings
related to tire service (load capacity,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 10, 2016
Jkt 241001
corresponding inflation pressure, etc.)
are correct. Even though the tires were
labeled incorrectly as ‘‘TREAD 4 PLIES
STEEL CORD’’ on one side of the tires,
the tires were manufactured with
‘‘TREAD 5 PLIES STEEL CORD’’, which
is correctly marked on the opposite tire
sidewall. The mislabeling of these tires
is not a safety concern and also has no
impact on the retreading and recycling
industries. The affected tire mold has
already been corrected and all future
production will have the correct number
of plies shown on both sidewalls.
Goodyear noted that NHTSA has
previously granted petitions for the
same noncompliance related to tire
construction information on tires
because of surveys that show most
consumers do not base purchases on tire
construction information found on the
tire sidewall.
Goodyear concluded by expressing
the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety, and that
its petition to be exempted from
providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that Goodyear no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve tire distributors and dealers of
the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant tires under their
control after Goodyear notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
Delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–27275 Filed 11–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0092; Notice 1]
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
(MBUSA), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2016 Mercedes GLClass multipurpose passenger vehicles
do not fully comply with paragraph
S4.3(d) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire
Selection and Rims and Motor Home/
Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load
Carrying Capacity Information for Motor
Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less.
MBUSA filed a report dated August 12,
2016, and amended it on August 29,
2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. MBUSA
then petitioned NHTSA under 49 CFR
part 556 for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is December 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 219 / Monday, November 14, 2016 / Notices
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All
comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also
be filed and will be considered to the
extent possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All documents submitted to the
docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The
documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number for this petition is shown in the
heading of this notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h) and their
implementing regulations at 49 CFR part
556, MBUSA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of MBUSA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgement concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Affected are
2,917 of the following MY 2016
Mercedes-Benz GL-Class multipurpose
passenger vehicles manufactured
between December 1, 2015, and
February 5, 2016:
• GL 350 Bluetec 4Matic SUV (155
vehicles).
• GL 450 4Matic SUV (2,482
vehicles).
• GL 550 4Matic SUV (280 vehicles).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Nov 10, 2016
Jkt 241001
III. Noncompliance: MBUSA explains
that the noncompliance is due to a
labeling error. The subject vehicles are
equipped with a spare tire, size T155/
80 R19 114M; however, the tire
information placard affixed to the
vehicles’ B-pillar incorrectly identifies
the spare tire size as T165/90 R19 119M.
The placard therefore does not comply
with requirements specified in
paragraph S4.3(d) of FMVSS No. 110.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3 of
FMVSS No. 110 states, in pertinent part:
S4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except for a
trailer or incomplete vehicle shall show the
information specified in S4.3 (a) through (g),
and may show, at the manufacturer’s option,
the information specified in S4.3 (h) through
(i), on a placard permanently affixed to the
driver’s side B-pillar. In each vehicle without
a driver’s side B-pillar and two doors on the
driver’s side of the vehicle opening in the
opposite directions, the placard shall be
affixed on the forward edge of the rear side
door . . .
(d) Tire size designation, indicated by the
headings ‘‘size’’ or ‘‘original tire size’’ or
‘‘original size,’’ and ‘‘spare tire’’ or ‘‘spare,’’
for the tires installed at the time of the first
purchase for purposes other than resale. For
full size spare tires, the statement ‘‘see
above’’ may, at the manufacturer’s option
replace the tire size designation. If no spare
tire is provided, the word ‘‘none’’ must
replace the tire size designation; . . .
V. Summary of MBUSA’s Petition:
MBUSA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MBUSA
stated the following:
(a) Both tire sizes can be used on the
vehicle. The spare tire with the size of T165/
90 R19 119M (the size stated on the B-pillar
label) is equipped on older models produced
before November 2015. The purpose of
FMVSS No. 110 is to ‘‘prevent tire
overloading,’’ see 40 CFR 571. S1, and no
overloading will result from the incorrect
label because either tire size (the one stated
on the label or the one actually on the
vehicle) can be used.
(b) The tire pressure is the same for both
spare tire sizes. When checking the tire
pressure for the spare tire, the customer will
find the correct tire pressure values on the
label. Again, no overloading will result from
the incorrect label because the correct tire
pressure values are provided.
(c) Information regarding the correct spare
tire is available to the vehicle owner. The
vehicles are equipped with an Operator’s
Manual which describes both spare tire sizes.
Also, if a tire needs to be replaced on the
spare wheel, the dealer Electronic Parts
Catalogue (EPC) correctly specifies the proper
tire part number. Additionally, further
assistance regarding the correct spare tire can
be provided by the customer assistance
center.
(d) The presumption that the issue
described above will have an inconsequential
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79559
impact on safety is supported by field data:
MBUSA is not aware of any customer
complaints, accidents, or injuries alleged to
have occurred as a result of this tire label
discrepancy in the United States.
MBUSA concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject vehicles that MBUSA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after MBUSA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–27274 Filed 11–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Intelligent Transportation Systems
Program Advisory Committee; Notice
of Meeting
ITS Joint Program Office, Office
of the Assistant Secretary for Research
and Technology, U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Intelligent Transportation
Systems (ITS) Program Advisory
Committee (ITSPAC) will hold a
meeting on December 7, 2016, from 8:30
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST) in the
Doubletree Crystal City Hotel, 300 Army
Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.
The ITSPAC, established under
Section 5305 of Public Law 109–59,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 219 (Monday, November 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79558-79559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27274]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0092; Notice 1]
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA), has determined that certain
model year (MY) 2016 Mercedes GL-Class multipurpose passenger vehicles
do not fully comply with paragraph S4.3(d) of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 110, Tire Selection and Rims and Motor
Home/Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for
Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less.
MBUSA filed a report dated August 12, 2016, and amended it on August
29, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. MBUSA then petitioned NHTSA under 49 CFR
part 556 for a decision that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is December 14,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than
[[Page 79559]]
15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will
be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed
and will be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All documents submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at
the address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and their
implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 556, MBUSA submitted a petition
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of MBUSA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgement concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Affected are 2,917 of the following MY 2016
Mercedes-Benz GL-Class multipurpose passenger vehicles manufactured
between December 1, 2015, and February 5, 2016:
GL 350 Bluetec 4Matic SUV (155 vehicles).
GL 450 4Matic SUV (2,482 vehicles).
GL 550 4Matic SUV (280 vehicles).
III. Noncompliance: MBUSA explains that the noncompliance is due to
a labeling error. The subject vehicles are equipped with a spare tire,
size T155/80 R19 114M; however, the tire information placard affixed to
the vehicles' B-pillar incorrectly identifies the spare tire size as
T165/90 R19 119M. The placard therefore does not comply with
requirements specified in paragraph S4.3(d) of FMVSS No. 110.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S4.3 of FMVSS No. 110 states, in pertinent
part:
S4.3 Placard. Each vehicle, except for a trailer or incomplete
vehicle shall show the information specified in S4.3 (a) through
(g), and may show, at the manufacturer's option, the information
specified in S4.3 (h) through (i), on a placard permanently affixed
to the driver's side B-pillar. In each vehicle without a driver's
side B-pillar and two doors on the driver's side of the vehicle
opening in the opposite directions, the placard shall be affixed on
the forward edge of the rear side door . . .
(d) Tire size designation, indicated by the headings ``size'' or
``original tire size'' or ``original size,'' and ``spare tire'' or
``spare,'' for the tires installed at the time of the first purchase
for purposes other than resale. For full size spare tires, the
statement ``see above'' may, at the manufacturer's option replace
the tire size designation. If no spare tire is provided, the word
``none'' must replace the tire size designation; . . .
V. Summary of MBUSA's Petition: MBUSA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, MBUSA stated the following:
(a) Both tire sizes can be used on the vehicle. The spare tire
with the size of T165/90 R19 119M (the size stated on the B-pillar
label) is equipped on older models produced before November 2015.
The purpose of FMVSS No. 110 is to ``prevent tire overloading,'' see
40 CFR 571. S1, and no overloading will result from the incorrect
label because either tire size (the one stated on the label or the
one actually on the vehicle) can be used.
(b) The tire pressure is the same for both spare tire sizes.
When checking the tire pressure for the spare tire, the customer
will find the correct tire pressure values on the label. Again, no
overloading will result from the incorrect label because the correct
tire pressure values are provided.
(c) Information regarding the correct spare tire is available to
the vehicle owner. The vehicles are equipped with an Operator's
Manual which describes both spare tire sizes. Also, if a tire needs
to be replaced on the spare wheel, the dealer Electronic Parts
Catalogue (EPC) correctly specifies the proper tire part number.
Additionally, further assistance regarding the correct spare tire
can be provided by the customer assistance center.
(d) The presumption that the issue described above will have an
inconsequential impact on safety is supported by field data: MBUSA
is not aware of any customer complaints, accidents, or injuries
alleged to have occurred as a result of this tire label discrepancy
in the United States.
MBUSA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that MBUSA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after MBUSA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-27274 Filed 11-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P