Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Price List, 78213-78217 [2016-26789]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices Overview of Major Issues for Meeting Report on Site Visits Highlights From Board Retreat • NSF Director’s Remarks • Discussion of NSB Structure Committee on Strategy and Budget Open session: 9:35–10:35 a.m. • CSB Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • Update on FY 2017 Budget • Ongoing Development of 2018–2022 Strategic Plan Committee on Audit and Oversight (A&O) Open session: 10:35–11:35 a.m. • A&O Chair’s Opening Remarks OIG Semiannual Report • Approval of Prior Minutes • National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Report: Implementation of Recommendation on Management Fee • Merit Review Pilot Report • Inspector General’s Update Update on Financial Statement Audit Introduction of New Inspector General for Audit OIG FY 2017 Audit Plan • Chief Financial Officer’s Update • NSF Intergovernmental Personnel Act Program Update Committee on Science and Engineering Indicators (SEI) Open session: 1:05–2:00 p.m. • SEI Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • Update on STEM Ph.D.s Career Pathways Companion Brief • Discussion: Indicators 2018 Overview and Transmittal Letter Committee on Programs and Plans Open session: 2:00–4:00 p.m. • CPP Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • CY 2017 Schedule of Planned Action and Information Items • Review of NSB’s Delegation of Award Authority • Advanced Computing Infrastructure and Polar Realignment Updates • Overview of BIO Portfolio: Status and Timelines sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Joint Session of CSB Subcommittee on Facilities (SCF) and CPP Open session: 4:20–5:10 p.m. • Committee Chairs’ Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • Discussion of Facilities-Related Information Products • Discussion of the Annual Facility Plan MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 Wednesday, November 9, 2016 Committee on Strategy and Budget Closed session: 9:00–10:05 a.m. • CSB Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • Update on NSF FY 2018 Budget Request Development Committee on Programs and Plans Closed Session: 10:05–10:25 a.m. • Committee Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • NEON Operations and Maintenance Update Plenary Board 78213 the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service met and voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Committee determined that no earlier public notice was possible. MATTERS CONSIDERED: Friday, October 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 1. Pricing. GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act. Closed session: 10:45–11:00 a.m. • NSB Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • NSF Director’s Remarks • Closed Committee Reports CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Plenary Board (Executive) Julie S. Moore, Secretary, Board of Governors. Closed session: 11:00 a.m.–11:25 a.m. • NSB Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • Recommendations for 2017 NSB Vannevar Bush and Public Service Awards Plenary Board Open session: 1:00–2:45 p.m. • NSB Chair’s Opening Remarks • Approval of Prior Minutes • NSF Director’s Remarks • Action Item: Changes to the Waterman Award Terms • Changes to the Annual Facility Plan • Discussion of Materials for the Presidential Transition • Report from the Congressional Engagement Working Group • Overview of NSF’s Relocation • Open Committee Reports • Chair’s Closing Remarks MEETING ADJOURNS: 2:45 p.m. Chris Blair, Executive Assistant, National Science Board Office. [FR Doc. 2016–26949 Filed 11–3–16; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P POSTAL SERVICE Sunshine Act Meeting; Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors October 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. PLACE: Washington, DC, via Teleconference. STATUS: Committee Votes to Close October 28, 2016, Meeting: By telephone vote on October 28, 2016, members of the Temporary Emergency Committee of DATES AND TIMES: PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20260–1000, telephone (202) 268–4800. [FR Doc. 2016–26895 Filed 11–3–16; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–79210; File No. SR–NYSE– 2016–68] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Price List November 1, 2016. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on October 18, 2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to change the manner by which rebates are payable, and level of such rebates, under the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program. The proposed rule change is available on the 1 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1). U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 2 15 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 78214 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to change the manner by which rebates are payable, and level of such rebates, under the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program. Current Liquidity Provider Incentive Program The Exchange proposes to change the manner by which rebates would be payable under the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program.4 Pursuant to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program, the Exchange currently pays Users of NYSE Bonds a monthly rebate provided Users who opt into the rebate program meet specified quoting requirements. Under the program, the rebate payable is based on the number of different bond issues (referred herein as ‘‘CUSIPs’’) 5 a User quotes. The rebate amount is tiered based on the number of CUSIPs quoted by a User, as follows: Monthly rebate Number of CUSIPs 400–599 ................................ 600–799 ................................ 800 or more .......................... $10,000 20,000 30,000 To qualify for a rebate, a User is required to provide continuous twosided quotes for at least eighty percent (80%) of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session 6 for a calendar month.7 The Exchange currently calculates each participating User’s quoting performance beginning each month on a daily basis, up to and including the last trading day of a calendar month, to determine at the end of each month each User’s monthly average. Under the current program, Users must provide a two-sided quote for a minimum of hundred (100) bonds per side of the market with an average spread of halfpoint ($0.50) or less in CUSIPs whose average maturity is at least five (5) years as of the date the User provides a quote. Revised Liquidity Provider Incentive Program The Exchange proposes to replace the current requirements in the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program. As proposed, a daily rebate would be payable based on the number of CUSIPs on the NYSE Bonds Book for which a User meets the quoting requirements in one or more of three maturity classifications (referred to herein as ‘‘maturity buckets’’). The proposed daily rebate amount is tiered based on the number of qualifying CUSIPs that meet quoting requirements, as follows: Number of qualifying CUSIPs 400–599 ................................ 600–799 ................................ 800 or more .......................... $500 1,000 1,500 For a CUSIP to be included in the daily rebate calculation, the following three requirements must be met: • First, a User must provide continuous two-sided quotes for a minimum of 100 bonds on either side of the market for at least eighty percent (80%) of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session each trading day. The Exchange will track throughout each trading day all CUSIPs a User quotes to determine the number CUSIPs that meet the size and time requirement noted above. • Second, once the Exchange has determined the number of CUSIPs that meet the size and time requirement, the Exchange would next determine how many of such CUSIPs meet the spread requirement. In order for a CUSIP to be included in the daily rebate calculation, it must be among the CUSIPs in a particular Maturity Range for which a User’s Maximum Daily Average Spread is: Maximum daily average spread (in basis points) of all CUSIPs in maturity range Maturity range Less than 7 years ................................................................................................................................ 7 years but less than 12 years ............................................................................................................ 12 years or more ................................................................................................................................. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Daily rebate Equal to or less than 15. Equal to or less than 10. Equal to or less than 10. To derive the Maximum Daily Average Spread, the Exchange will determine the average bid and offer spread for each CUSIP within each Maturity Range for every User that provides a quote in a CUSIP. The average bid and offer spread would be calculated by taking the difference of the Yield-To-Worst (YTW) of the average bid and the YTW of the average offer throughout each trading day. The Exchange will then aggregate the average spreads of all the CUSIPs in each Maturity Range. If the aggregate average spread of all the CUSIPs is less than or equal to the Maximum Daily Average Spread, as provided in the table above, all such CUSIPs would qualify for a rebate provided the CUSIPs also meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement described below. If the average spread of all the CUSIPs is greater than the Maximum Daily Average Spread, the Exchange would eliminate CUSIPs with the widest spreads until the average spread of the remaining CUSIPS is equal 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 77591 (April 12, 2016), 81 FR 22656 (April 18, 2016) (SR– NYSE–2016–26); and 77812 (May 11, 2016), 81 FR 30594 May 17, 2016) (SR–NYSE–2016–34). 5 CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities Identification Procedures. A CUSIP number identifies most financial instruments, including: Stocks of all registered U.S. and Canadian companies, commercial paper, and U.S. government and municipal bonds. The CUSIP system—owned by the American Bankers Association and managed by Standard & Poor’s— facilitates the clearance and settlement process of securities. See https://www.sec.gov/answers/ cusip.htm. 6 The Core Bond Trading Session commences at 8:00 a.m. ET and concludes at 5:00 p.m. ET. See Rule 86(i)(2). 7 For the first calendar month after a User opts in, the User is required to provide continuous twosided quotes for fifty percent (50%) of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices to or less than the Maximum Daily Average Spread. • Finally, of the CUSIPs that met the average spread requirement, the Exchange would determine how many of such CUSIPs meet the duration 8 requirement. In order for a CUSIP to be included in the daily rebate calculation, 78215 it must be among the CUSIPs in a particular Maturity Range for which a User’s Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration is: Minimum daily average modified duration of all CUSIPs in maturity range Maturity range Less than 7 years ................................................................................................................................ 7 years but less than 12 years ............................................................................................................ 12 years or more ................................................................................................................................. Equal to or greater than 3.25. Equal to or greater than 6.75. Equal to or greater than 14.50. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES To derive the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, the Exchange will determine the average Modified Duration for each CUSIP within each Maturity Range for every User that provides a quote in a CUSIP. The average Modified Duration would be determined by the midpoint of the average bid and the average offer for each CUSIP quoted by a User throughout each trading day. The Exchange will then aggregate the average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs in each Maturity Range. If the aggregate average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs is greater than or equal to the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, as provided in the table above, all such CUSIPs would qualify for a rebate. If the average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs is less than the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, the Exchange would eliminate CUSIPs with the lowest average Modified Duration until the average Modified Duration of the remaining CUSIPS is equal to or greater than the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration. The Exchange would then aggregate the maximum number of CUSIPs across each Maturity Range that a User meets the requirements above to determine such User’s daily rebate. The following example illustrates the proposed rebate: User A provides two-sided quotes for a minimum of 100 bonds in a total of 900 CUSIPs on trading day 1. The 900 CUSIPs are comprised as follows: 300 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years, 400 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years and 200 CUSIPs that mature in 12 years or more. The Exchange will track the number of CUSIPs (of the 900 CUSIPs) that were quoted for a minimum of 100 bonds on either side of the market for at least 80% of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session. At the end of trading day 1, let us assume that of the 900 CUSIPs, the following met the size and time requirement within each maturity bucket: 150 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years, 325 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years and 125 CUSIPs that mature in 12 years or more. As noted above, the Exchange would next determine the number of CUSIPs in each maturity bucket that meet the Maximum Daily Average Spread requirement. Let’s assume that for the 325 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years, the average spread of all 325 CUSIPs in this maturity bucket equals 12 basis points. Given that the Maximum Daily Average Spread for this maturity bucket must be equal to or less than 10 basis points, the Exchange would remove CUSIPs from this maturity bucket starting with the CUSIP with the widest average spread until the Maximum Daily Average Spread requirement is equal to or less than 10 basis points. Let us assume that removing 10 CUSIPs with the widest average spread brings the aggregate average spread to 10 basis points. Therefore, of the 325 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years, 315 of such CUSIPs would deem to meet the Maximum Daily Average Spread requirement.9 As provided above, the Exchange would next determine the number of CUSIPs within each maturity bucket that meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement. Continuing with the example above, let us assume that the aggregate average Modified Duration of all 315 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years is 6.50. Given that the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration for this maturity bucket must be equal to or greater than 6.75, the Exchange would remove CUSIPs from this maturity bucket starting with the CUSIP with the lowest average Modified Duration until the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement is equal to or greater than 6.75. Let us assume that removing 15 CUSIPs with the lowest average Modified Duration brings the aggregate average Modified Duration to 6.75. Therefore, of the 315 remaining CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years, 300 of such CUSIPs would deem to meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement.10 Continuing with the example, let us assume the following represents the number of CUSIPs within each maturity bucket that meet the prescribed requirements at the end of trading day 1: • 125 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years; • 300 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years; and • 100 CUSIPs that mature in 12 years or more. At the end of trading day 1, User A has met the prescribed quoting requirements in a total of 525 CUSIPs and would therefore qualify for a rebate of $500 for trading day 1. The Exchange would make the determination of whether a User has met the prescribed quoting requirements each trading day to determine the 8 The duration of a bond is a measure of its price sensitivity to interest rates movements, based on the average time to maturity of its interest and principal cash flows. Duration enables investor [sic] to more easily compare bonds with different maturities and coupon rates by creating a simple rule: With every percentage change in interest rates, the bond’s value will decline by its modified duration, stated as a percentage. Modified duration is the approximate percentage change in a bond’s price for each 1% change in yield assuming yield changes do not change the expected cash flows. For example, an investment with a modified duration of 5 years will rise 5% in value for every 1% decline in interest rates and fall 5% in value for every 1% increase in interest rates. Bond duration measurements help quantify and measure exposure to interest rate risks. Bond portfolio managers increase average duration when they expect rates to decline, to get the most benefit, and decrease average duration when they expect rates to rise, to minimize the negative impact. See duration risk at https://www.sifma.org/ education/glossary/#M. 9 If the average spread of all 325 CUSIPs had been 10 basis points then all 325 CUSIPs would have met the Maximum Daily Average Spread requirement and would qualify for the proposed daily rebate provided all 325 CUSIPs also meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement. 10 If the aggregate average Modified Duration of all 315 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years had been 6.75 then all 315 CUSIPs would have met the Minimum Daily Average Modified Requirement and would qualify for the proposed daily rebate. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1 78216 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices amount of daily rebate for which a User qualifies. The Exchange would aggregate the daily rebate for each User and pay the total amount of the accumulated rebate to each User at the end of every month. The Exchange will continue to calculate each participating User’s quoting performance on a daily basis. Users who opt in to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program are currently subject to a transaction fee for orders that provide liquidity to the NYSE Bonds Book of $0.50 per bond.11 The Exchange proposes to eliminate the $0.50 per bond fee for providing liquidity. To reflect this change, the Exchange proposes to delete text from the Price List regarding the applicability of the $0.50 per bond fee for orders that provide liquidity to the NYSE Bonds Book. The proposed rule change is intended to provide Users with a greater incentive to transact on the NYSE Bonds system. 2. Statutory Basis sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,12 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,13 in particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to amend the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program for the bonds trading platform, which would provide daily rebates to Users that meet unique quoting requirements. The Liquidity Provider Incentive Program is already available for Users and the Exchange is simply amending the quoting requirements which the Exchange believes could qualify greater number of Users for the proposed rebate. Further, the Exchange believes it is reasonable and equitable to adopt a daily rebate as an incentive for Users to provide liquidity on the Exchange’s bond platform on a daily basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed quoting requirements to qualify for the daily rebate, which would be based on the average spread and average 11 The Exchange recently adopted a fee waiver applicable to Users that provide liquidity in 800 or more qualifying CUSIPs quoted on the NYSE Bonds Book, and a fee cap of $5,000 per month applicable to all Users that do not attain the fee waiver. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78108 (June 21, 2016), 81 FR 41636 (June 27, 2016) (SR–NYSE– 2016–42). 12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:02 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 duration, are reasonable and would not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, and brokers or dealers because all member organizations that opt in to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program would be subject to the same requirements. The Exchange further believes that the proposed quoting requirements are reasonable because they are designed to provide an incentive for member organizations to increase displayed liquidity at the Exchange, thereby increasing traded volume. Recognizing the statements of Commissioners who have expressed concern about the state of the U.S. corporate and municipal bond markets as well as recommendations outlined in the Commission’s release of its Report on the Municipal Securities Market (Report), the Exchange believes that amending the Exchange’s transaction fees and rebates for the Bonds system would create an incentive for bonds traders to direct their liquidity to the Exchange, and therefore would be an important element in the democratization of the fixed income market.14 As highlighted in SEC Chair White’s statement during the SEC’s 2013 Roundtable on Fixed Income Markets, the Report makes recommendations that include (1) improving pre- and posttrade transparency; (2) promoting the use of transparent and open trading venues, and (3) requiring dealers to seek ‘‘best execution’’ for customers and to provide customers with relevant pricing information in connection with their transactions.15 Achieving these recommendations and applying them to both the municipal and corporate bond markets would, in the Exchange’s view, assist in lowering the systemic risk that is anticipated to increase as interest rates rise and the closed network of bond trading comes under pressure as retirement and pension managers seek to adjust their positions. The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is consistent with these principles and the proposed amendment to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program is intended to provide additional liquidity to the market and add competition to the existing group of liquidity providers. The Exchange believes that by requiring Users to quote 14 See SEC Report on the Municipal Securities Market, at https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2012/ munireport073112.pdfSEC’s Gallagher Says Retail Bond Investors Fighting ‘Headwinds’ ’’, https:// www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-19/sec-sgallagher-says-retail-bond-investors-fightingheadwinds-.html 15 See Opening remarks of Chairman Mary Jo White at SEC Roundtable on Fixed Income Markets. https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/ 1365171515300. PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 within the prescribed parameters for a percentage of the regular trading day, and by paying them a daily rebate for providing liquidity in large number of bonds, the Exchange is rewarding aggressive liquidity providers in the market, and by doing so, the Exchange will encourage the additional utilization of, and interaction with, the NYSE and provide customers with the premier venue for price discovery, liquidity, and competitive quotes. Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory in that it would apply uniformly to all Users accessing the NYSE Bonds system. All similarly situated Users would be subject to the same fee and rebate structure, and each User would have the ability to determine the extent to which the Exchange’s proposed fee and rebate structure will provide it with an economic incentive to use the NYSE Bonds system, and model its business accordingly. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,16 the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Debt securities typically trade in a decentralized OTC dealer market that is less liquid and transparent than the equities markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed change would increase competition with these OTC venues by creating additional incentives to engage in bonds transactions on the Exchange and rewarding market participants for actively quoting and providing liquidity in the only transparent bond market, which the Exchange believes will enhance market quality. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues that are not transparent. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider adjusting its fees and rebates to remain competitive with other exchanges as well as with alternative trading systems and other venues that are not required to comply with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee 16 15 E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 07NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impair the ability of member organizations or competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 17 of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 18 thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 19 of the Act to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSE–2016–68 on the subject line. Paper Comments and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–2016–68. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE– 2016–68 and should be submitted on or before November 28, 2016. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.20 Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–26789 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–79209; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2016–138] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule Effective November 1, 2016 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B). November 1, 2016. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective November 1, 2016. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of this filing is to provide for fees for manually executed Professional Customer orders, effective November 1, 2016. Currently, the Exchange does not differentiate between Customer and Professional Customer orders for purposes of manual transaction fees, and Customers and Professional Customers are not charged any fee for orders executed in open outcry.4 18 17 Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 20 17 1 15 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 U.S.C. 78a. CFR 240.19b–4. 4 Per the Fee Schedule, ‘‘[u]nless Professional Customer executions are specifically delineated, such executions will be treated as Customer executions for fee purposes.’’ See Fee Schedule, available here, https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/ 3 17 17 15 16:02 Nov 04, 2016 ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on October 25, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 2 15 • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities VerDate Sep<11>2014 78217 Sfmt 4703 Continued E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM 07NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78213-78217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79210; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-68]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change 
Amending Its Price List

November 1, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on October 18, 2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, 
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to change the manner 
by which rebates are payable, and level of such rebates, under the 
Liquidity Provider Incentive Program. The proposed rule change is 
available on the

[[Page 78214]]

Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to change the manner 
by which rebates are payable, and level of such rebates, under the 
Liquidity Provider Incentive Program.
Current Liquidity Provider Incentive Program
    The Exchange proposes to change the manner by which rebates would 
be payable under the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program.\4\ Pursuant 
to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program, the Exchange currently 
pays Users of NYSE Bonds a monthly rebate provided Users who opt into 
the rebate program meet specified quoting requirements. Under the 
program, the rebate payable is based on the number of different bond 
issues (referred herein as ``CUSIPs'') \5\ a User quotes. The rebate 
amount is tiered based on the number of CUSIPs quoted by a User, as 
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 77591 (April 12, 
2016), 81 FR 22656 (April 18, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-26); and 77812 
(May 11, 2016), 81 FR 30594 May 17, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-34).
    \5\ CUSIP stands for Committee on Uniform Securities 
Identification Procedures. A CUSIP number identifies most financial 
instruments, including: Stocks of all registered U.S. and Canadian 
companies, commercial paper, and U.S. government and municipal 
bonds. The CUSIP system--owned by the American Bankers Association 
and managed by Standard & Poor's--facilitates the clearance and 
settlement process of securities. See https://www.sec.gov/answers/cusip.htm.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Monthly
                    Number of CUSIPs                          rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
400-599.................................................         $10,000
600-799.................................................          20,000
800 or more.............................................          30,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To qualify for a rebate, a User is required to provide continuous 
two-sided quotes for at least eighty percent (80%) of the time during 
the Core Bond Trading Session \6\ for a calendar month.\7\ The Exchange 
currently calculates each participating User's quoting performance 
beginning each month on a daily basis, up to and including the last 
trading day of a calendar month, to determine at the end of each month 
each User's monthly average. Under the current program, Users must 
provide a two-sided quote for a minimum of hundred (100) bonds per side 
of the market with an average spread of half-point ($0.50) or less in 
CUSIPs whose average maturity is at least five (5) years as of the date 
the User provides a quote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Core Bond Trading Session commences at 8:00 a.m. ET and 
concludes at 5:00 p.m. ET. See Rule 86(i)(2).
    \7\ For the first calendar month after a User opts in, the User 
is required to provide continuous two-sided quotes for fifty percent 
(50%) of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revised Liquidity Provider Incentive Program
    The Exchange proposes to replace the current requirements in the 
Liquidity Provider Incentive Program. As proposed, a daily rebate would 
be payable based on the number of CUSIPs on the NYSE Bonds Book for 
which a User meets the quoting requirements in one or more of three 
maturity classifications (referred to herein as ``maturity buckets'').
    The proposed daily rebate amount is tiered based on the number of 
qualifying CUSIPs that meet quoting requirements, as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Number of  qualifying CUSIPs                 Daily  rebate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
400-599.................................................            $500
600-799.................................................           1,000
800 or more.............................................           1,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a CUSIP to be included in the daily rebate calculation, the 
following three requirements must be met:
     First, a User must provide continuous two-sided quotes for 
a minimum of 100 bonds on either side of the market for at least eighty 
percent (80%) of the time during the Core Bond Trading Session each 
trading day. The Exchange will track throughout each trading day all 
CUSIPs a User quotes to determine the number CUSIPs that meet the size 
and time requirement noted above.
     Second, once the Exchange has determined the number of 
CUSIPs that meet the size and time requirement, the Exchange would next 
determine how many of such CUSIPs meet the spread requirement. In order 
for a CUSIP to be included in the daily rebate calculation, it must be 
among the CUSIPs in a particular Maturity Range for which a User's 
Maximum Daily Average Spread is:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Maximum daily average spread  (in basis points)  of all CUSIPs in
               Maturity range                                           maturity range
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 7 years..........................  Equal to or less than 15.
7 years but less than 12 years.............  Equal to or less than 10.
12 years or more...........................  Equal to or less than 10.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To derive the Maximum Daily Average Spread, the Exchange will 
determine the average bid and offer spread for each CUSIP within each 
Maturity Range for every User that provides a quote in a CUSIP. The 
average bid and offer spread would be calculated by taking the 
difference of the Yield-To-Worst (YTW) of the average bid and the YTW 
of the average offer throughout each trading day. The Exchange will 
then aggregate the average spreads of all the CUSIPs in each Maturity 
Range. If the aggregate average spread of all the CUSIPs is less than 
or equal to the Maximum Daily Average Spread, as provided in the table 
above, all such CUSIPs would qualify for a rebate provided the CUSIPs 
also meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration requirement 
described below. If the average spread of all the CUSIPs is greater 
than the Maximum Daily Average Spread, the Exchange would eliminate 
CUSIPs with the widest spreads until the average spread of the 
remaining CUSIPS is equal

[[Page 78215]]

to or less than the Maximum Daily Average Spread.
     Finally, of the CUSIPs that met the average spread 
requirement, the Exchange would determine how many of such CUSIPs meet 
the duration \8\ requirement. In order for a CUSIP to be included in 
the daily rebate calculation, it must be among the CUSIPs in a 
particular Maturity Range for which a User's Minimum Daily Average 
Modified Duration is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The duration of a bond is a measure of its price sensitivity 
to interest rates movements, based on the average time to maturity 
of its interest and principal cash flows. Duration enables investor 
[sic] to more easily compare bonds with different maturities and 
coupon rates by creating a simple rule: With every percentage change 
in interest rates, the bond's value will decline by its modified 
duration, stated as a percentage. Modified duration is the 
approximate percentage change in a bond's price for each 1% change 
in yield assuming yield changes do not change the expected cash 
flows. For example, an investment with a modified duration of 5 
years will rise 5% in value for every 1% decline in interest rates 
and fall 5% in value for every 1% increase in interest rates. Bond 
duration measurements help quantify and measure exposure to interest 
rate risks. Bond portfolio managers increase average duration when 
they expect rates to decline, to get the most benefit, and decrease 
average duration when they expect rates to rise, to minimize the 
negative impact. See duration risk at https://www.sifma.org/education/glossary/#M.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Minimum daily average  modified duration of all  CUSIPs in maturity
               Maturity range                                               range
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 7 years..........................  Equal to or greater than 3.25.
7 years but less than 12 years.............  Equal to or greater than 6.75.
12 years or more...........................  Equal to or greater than 14.50.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To derive the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, the Exchange 
will determine the average Modified Duration for each CUSIP within each 
Maturity Range for every User that provides a quote in a CUSIP. The 
average Modified Duration would be determined by the midpoint of the 
average bid and the average offer for each CUSIP quoted by a User 
throughout each trading day. The Exchange will then aggregate the 
average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs in each Maturity Range. If 
the aggregate average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs is greater 
than or equal to the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, as 
provided in the table above, all such CUSIPs would qualify for a 
rebate. If the average Modified Duration of all the CUSIPs is less than 
the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration, the Exchange would 
eliminate CUSIPs with the lowest average Modified Duration until the 
average Modified Duration of the remaining CUSIPS is equal to or 
greater than the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration.
    The Exchange would then aggregate the maximum number of CUSIPs 
across each Maturity Range that a User meets the requirements above to 
determine such User's daily rebate.
    The following example illustrates the proposed rebate:
    User A provides two-sided quotes for a minimum of 100 bonds in a 
total of 900 CUSIPs on trading day 1. The 900 CUSIPs are comprised as 
follows: 300 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years, 400 CUSIPs that 
mature in 7 years but less than 12 years and 200 CUSIPs that mature in 
12 years or more. The Exchange will track the number of CUSIPs (of the 
900 CUSIPs) that were quoted for a minimum of 100 bonds on either side 
of the market for at least 80% of the time during the Core Bond Trading 
Session. At the end of trading day 1, let us assume that of the 900 
CUSIPs, the following met the size and time requirement within each 
maturity bucket: 150 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years, 325 
CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years and 125 CUSIPs 
that mature in 12 years or more.
    As noted above, the Exchange would next determine the number of 
CUSIPs in each maturity bucket that meet the Maximum Daily Average 
Spread requirement. Let's assume that for the 325 CUSIPs that mature in 
7 years but less than 12 years, the average spread of all 325 CUSIPs in 
this maturity bucket equals 12 basis points. Given that the Maximum 
Daily Average Spread for this maturity bucket must be equal to or less 
than 10 basis points, the Exchange would remove CUSIPs from this 
maturity bucket starting with the CUSIP with the widest average spread 
until the Maximum Daily Average Spread requirement is equal to or less 
than 10 basis points. Let us assume that removing 10 CUSIPs with the 
widest average spread brings the aggregate average spread to 10 basis 
points. Therefore, of the 325 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less 
than 12 years, 315 of such CUSIPs would deem to meet the Maximum Daily 
Average Spread requirement.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ If the average spread of all 325 CUSIPs had been 10 basis 
points then all 325 CUSIPs would have met the Maximum Daily Average 
Spread requirement and would qualify for the proposed daily rebate 
provided all 325 CUSIPs also meet the Minimum Daily Average Modified 
Duration requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As provided above, the Exchange would next determine the number of 
CUSIPs within each maturity bucket that meet the Minimum Daily Average 
Modified Duration requirement. Continuing with the example above, let 
us assume that the aggregate average Modified Duration of all 315 
CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years is 6.50. Given 
that the Minimum Daily Average Modified Duration for this maturity 
bucket must be equal to or greater than 6.75, the Exchange would remove 
CUSIPs from this maturity bucket starting with the CUSIP with the 
lowest average Modified Duration until the Minimum Daily Average 
Modified Duration requirement is equal to or greater than 6.75. Let us 
assume that removing 15 CUSIPs with the lowest average Modified 
Duration brings the aggregate average Modified Duration to 6.75. 
Therefore, of the 315 remaining CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less 
than 12 years, 300 of such CUSIPs would deem to meet the Minimum Daily 
Average Modified Duration requirement.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ If the aggregate average Modified Duration of all 315 
CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years had been 6.75 
then all 315 CUSIPs would have met the Minimum Daily Average 
Modified Requirement and would qualify for the proposed daily 
rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Continuing with the example, let us assume the following represents 
the number of CUSIPs within each maturity bucket that meet the 
prescribed requirements at the end of trading day 1:
     125 CUSIPs that mature in less than 7 years;
     300 CUSIPs that mature in 7 years but less than 12 years; 
and
     100 CUSIPs that mature in 12 years or more.
    At the end of trading day 1, User A has met the prescribed quoting 
requirements in a total of 525 CUSIPs and would therefore qualify for a 
rebate of $500 for trading day 1.
    The Exchange would make the determination of whether a User has met 
the prescribed quoting requirements each trading day to determine the

[[Page 78216]]

amount of daily rebate for which a User qualifies. The Exchange would 
aggregate the daily rebate for each User and pay the total amount of 
the accumulated rebate to each User at the end of every month. The 
Exchange will continue to calculate each participating User's quoting 
performance on a daily basis.
    Users who opt in to the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program are 
currently subject to a transaction fee for orders that provide 
liquidity to the NYSE Bonds Book of $0.50 per bond.\11\ The Exchange 
proposes to eliminate the $0.50 per bond fee for providing liquidity. 
To reflect this change, the Exchange proposes to delete text from the 
Price List regarding the applicability of the $0.50 per bond fee for 
orders that provide liquidity to the NYSE Bonds Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange recently adopted a fee waiver applicable to 
Users that provide liquidity in 800 or more qualifying CUSIPs quoted 
on the NYSE Bonds Book, and a fee cap of $5,000 per month applicable 
to all Users that do not attain the fee waiver. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 78108 (June 21, 2016), 81 FR 41636 (June 
27, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-42).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is intended to provide Users with a 
greater incentive to transact on the NYSE Bonds system.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in 
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of 
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and 
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate 
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to amend 
the Liquidity Provider Incentive Program for the bonds trading 
platform, which would provide daily rebates to Users that meet unique 
quoting requirements. The Liquidity Provider Incentive Program is 
already available for Users and the Exchange is simply amending the 
quoting requirements which the Exchange believes could qualify greater 
number of Users for the proposed rebate. Further, the Exchange believes 
it is reasonable and equitable to adopt a daily rebate as an incentive 
for Users to provide liquidity on the Exchange's bond platform on a 
daily basis. The Exchange believes that the proposed quoting 
requirements to qualify for the daily rebate, which would be based on 
the average spread and average duration, are reasonable and would not 
unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, and brokers or 
dealers because all member organizations that opt in to the Liquidity 
Provider Incentive Program would be subject to the same requirements. 
The Exchange further believes that the proposed quoting requirements 
are reasonable because they are designed to provide an incentive for 
member organizations to increase displayed liquidity at the Exchange, 
thereby increasing traded volume.
    Recognizing the statements of Commissioners who have expressed 
concern about the state of the U.S. corporate and municipal bond 
markets as well as recommendations outlined in the Commission's release 
of its Report on the Municipal Securities Market (Report), the Exchange 
believes that amending the Exchange's transaction fees and rebates for 
the Bonds system would create an incentive for bonds traders to direct 
their liquidity to the Exchange, and therefore would be an important 
element in the democratization of the fixed income market.\14\ As 
highlighted in SEC Chair White's statement during the SEC's 2013 
Roundtable on Fixed Income Markets, the Report makes recommendations 
that include (1) improving pre- and post-trade transparency; (2) 
promoting the use of transparent and open trading venues, and (3) 
requiring dealers to seek ``best execution'' for customers and to 
provide customers with relevant pricing information in connection with 
their transactions.\15\ Achieving these recommendations and applying 
them to both the municipal and corporate bond markets would, in the 
Exchange's view, assist in lowering the systemic risk that is 
anticipated to increase as interest rates rise and the closed network 
of bond trading comes under pressure as retirement and pension managers 
seek to adjust their positions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See SEC Report on the Municipal Securities Market, at 
https://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2012/munireport073112.pdfSEC's 
Gallagher Says Retail Bond Investors Fighting `Headwinds' '', https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-19/sec-s-gallagher-says-retail-bond-investors-fighting-headwinds-.html
    \15\ See Opening remarks of Chairman Mary Jo White at SEC 
Roundtable on Fixed Income Markets. https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1365171515300.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed fee change is consistent with 
these principles and the proposed amendment to the Liquidity Provider 
Incentive Program is intended to provide additional liquidity to the 
market and add competition to the existing group of liquidity 
providers. The Exchange believes that by requiring Users to quote 
within the prescribed parameters for a percentage of the regular 
trading day, and by paying them a daily rebate for providing liquidity 
in large number of bonds, the Exchange is rewarding aggressive 
liquidity providers in the market, and by doing so, the Exchange will 
encourage the additional utilization of, and interaction with, the NYSE 
and provide customers with the premier venue for price discovery, 
liquidity, and competitive quotes.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory in that it would apply 
uniformly to all Users accessing the NYSE Bonds system. All similarly 
situated Users would be subject to the same fee and rebate structure, 
and each User would have the ability to determine the extent to which 
the Exchange's proposed fee and rebate structure will provide it with 
an economic incentive to use the NYSE Bonds system, and model its 
business accordingly.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\16\ the Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Debt securities typically trade in a decentralized 
OTC dealer market that is less liquid and transparent than the equities 
markets. The Exchange believes that the proposed change would increase 
competition with these OTC venues by creating additional incentives to 
engage in bonds transactions on the Exchange and rewarding market 
participants for actively quoting and providing liquidity in the only 
transparent bond market, which the Exchange believes will enhance 
market quality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market 
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues that 
are not transparent. In such an environment, the Exchange must 
continually review, and consider adjusting its fees and rebates to 
remain competitive with other exchanges as well as with alternative 
trading systems and other venues that are not required to comply with 
the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because competitors 
are free to modify their own fees and credits in response, and because 
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, 
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee

[[Page 78217]]

changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is 
extremely limited. As a result of all of these considerations, the 
Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impair the 
ability of member organizations or competing order execution venues to 
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \17\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 
19b-4 \18\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other 
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \19\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2016-68 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-68. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-68 and should be 
submitted on or before November 28, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-26789 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.