Daimler Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78259-78261 [2016-26764]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices
telephone: (804) 371–4082. The Virginia
Department of Transportation’s normal
business hours are 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Notice is
hereby given that FHWA has taken final
agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) by issuing licenses, permits,
and approvals for the following project
in the State of Virginia: The widening of
Interstate 64 for approximately eight
miles between the I–464 Interchange
and I–664/I–264 in the City of
Chesapeake, Virginia. The project would
involve constructing two additional
lanes of capacity in each direction
including the construction of a new
bridge and replacement of the existing
High Rise Bridge. The actions taken by
FHWA, and the laws under which such
actions were taken, are described in the
Environmental Assessment (EA), the
Request for the Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) that
included a Revised EA, and the FONSI.
The EA was signed on October 3, 2014.
The FONSI was issued on August 22,
2016. The EA, Request for the FONSI,
and FONSI can be viewed on the
project’s internet site at https://
virginiadot.org/projects/hamptonroads/
i-64_southside__high_rise_bridge_
phased_construction.asp.
These documents and other project
records are also available by contacting
FHWA or the Virginia Department of
Transportation at the phone numbers
and addresses listed above. This notice
applies to all Federal agency decisions
as of the issuance date of this notice and
all laws under which such actions were
taken, including but not limited to:
1. General: National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–
4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act
(FAHA) [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C.
128].
2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q)].
3. Land: Section 4(f) of the
Department of Transportation Act of
1966 [49 U.S.C. 303; 23 U.S.C. 138].
4. Historic and Cultural Resources:
Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended
[16 U.S.C. 470(f) et seq.].
5. Social and Economic: Farmland
Protection Policy Act [7 U.S.C. 4201–
4209].
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Nov 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
Dated: November 1, 2016.
John Simkins,
Planning and Environment Team Leader,
Richmond, Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2016–26812 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0103; Notice 1]
Daimler Trucks North America, Receipt
of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Daimler Trucks North
America (DTNA), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2016–2017
Freightliner and Western Star trucks do
not fully comply with Table 2 of Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 101, Controls and Displays. DTNA
filed a report dated September 22, 2016,
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports. DTNA also petitioned NHTSA
on September 22, 2016, under 49 CFR
part 556 for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is December 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited in the title of this
notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78259
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number for this
petition is shown in the heading of this
notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
30118(d) and 30120(h), 49 CFR part 556,
DTNA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of DTNA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Affected are
approximately 36,959 MY 2016–2017
versions of the following trucks,
manufactured between September 28,
2015 and July 30, 2016:
• Freightliner Cascadia
• Freightliner 122SD
• Freightliner Coronado
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
78260
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
III. Noncompliance: DTNA explains
that the noncompliance is that the Low
Brake Air Pressure telltale for air brake
systems displays the word ‘‘BRAKE’’
and a red International Standards
Organization (ISO) symbol for brake
malfunction when a low air brake
pressure condition exists, rather than
the words ‘‘BRAKE AIR,’’ as specified in
Table 2 of FMVSS No. 101. DTNA states
BILLING CODE 4910–59–C
V. Summary of DTNA’s Petition:
DTNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that
the noncompliance is inconsequential
as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, DTNA
submitted the following reasoning:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Nov 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
that the telltale is accompanied by an
audible alert and low pressure gauge
reading.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5 of FMVSS
No. 101 provides: ‘‘Each passenger car,
multipurpose passenger vehicle, truck
and bus that is fitted with a control, a
telltale, or an indicator listed in Table
1 or Table 2 must meet the requirements
of this standard for the location,
identification, color, and illumination of
that control, telltale or indicator.’’
(a) DTNA notes that the purpose of
the low brake air pressure telltale is to
alert the driver to a low air condition,
consistent with the requirements of
FMVSS No. 121, S5.1.5 (warning
signal). The word ‘‘BRAKE’’ instead of
‘‘BRAKE AIR,’’ together with the
audible alert that occurs in the subject
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101
provides, in pertinent part: ‘‘. . . each
control, telltale and indicator that is
listed in column 1 and 2 of Table 1 or
Table 2 must be identified by the
symbol specified for it in column 2 or
the word or abbreviation specified for it
in column 3 of Table 1 or Table 2.’’
Table 2 appears as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
vehicles would still alert the driver to
an issue with the brake system. Once
alerted, the driver can check the actual
air pressure by reading the primary and
secondary air gauges and seeing the
contrasting color on the gauges
indicating low pressure.
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
EN07NO16.001
• Western Star 5700
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Notices
(b) NHTSA stated in a 2005 FMVSS
No. 101 rulemaking that the reason for
including vehicles over 10,000 pounds
in the requirements of FMVSS No. 101
is that there is a need for drivers of
heavier vehicles to see and identify their
displays, just as there is for drivers of
lighter vehicles. See 70 FR 48295, 48298
(Aug. 17, 2005). The telltale in the
subject vehicles saying ‘‘BRAKE’’ would
allow the driver to see and identify the
improper functioning system as was the
intent of the rule, thus serving the
purpose of the FMVSS No. 101
requirement.
(c) There are two scenarios when a
low brake air pressure condition would
exist: A parked vehicle and a moving
vehicle. Each of these are discussed
separately below; in each scenario, there
is ample warning provided to the driver
of low brake air pressure.
a. Parked Vehicle
The driver of an air-braked vehicle
must ensure that the vehicle has enough
brake air pressure to operate safely. At
startup, the vehicle will likely be in a
low air condition. When in a low air
condition the following warnings would
occur, conditioning the driver over time
as to the purpose of the telltale and
audible alerts and under what
conditions they are activated.
• Red contrasting color of the telltale
saying ‘‘BRAKE’’.
• Red contrasting color of the ISO
symbol for brake malfunction.
• Audible alert to the driver as long
as the vehicle has low air.
• Air gauges for the primary and
secondary air tanks clearly showing the
air pressure in the system.
• Red contrasting color on the air
gauges indicating when the pressure is
low.
• Difficulty/inability of releasing the
parking brakes with low air.
• Reduced drivability if the driver
attempts to drive with the parking
brakes applied.
b. Moving Vehicle
If a low brake air pressure situation
occurs while driving, the function of the
service brakes may be reduced or lost
and, eventually if the pressure gets low
enough, the parking brakes will engage.
The driver must pull to the side of the
road and apply the parking brakes as
soon as possible. A loss of brake air
pressure while driving represents a
malfunctioning brake system and
requires immediate action from the
driver. Drivers recognize that a telltale
illuminated in red represents a
malfunction which needs to be
remedied.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:02 Nov 04, 2016
Jkt 241001
The following warning would occur if
a low air condition occurred while
driving.
• Red contrasting color of the telltale
saying ‘‘BRAKE’’.
• Red contrasting color of the ISO
symbol for brake malfunction.
• Audible alert to the driver as long
as the vehicle has low air.
• Air gauges for the primary and
secondary air tanks clearly showing the
air pressure in the system.
• Red contrasting color on the air
gauges indicating when the pressure is
low.
The functionality of both the parking
brake system and the service brake
system remains unaffected by the
‘‘BRAKE’’ telltale used in the subject
vehicles.
(d) NHTSA Precedents—DTNA notes
that NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for decisions of
inconsequential noncompliance for
similar brake telltale issues, in which
the ISO symbol in combination with
other available warnings was deemed
sufficient to provide the necessary
driver warning. See Docket No.
NHTSA–2012–0004, 78 FR 69931
(November 21, 2013) (grant of petition
for Ford Motor Company) and Docket
No. NHTSA–2014–0046, 79 FR 78559
(December 30, 2014) (grant of petition
for Chrysler Group, LLC). In both of
these instances, the vehicles at issue
displayed an ISO symbol for the brake
telltale instead of the wording required
under FMVSS No. 101. The ISO symbol
in combination with other available
warnings was deemed sufficient to
provide the necessary driver warning.
DTNA respectfully suggests that the
same is true for the subject vehicles: The
ISO symbol, together with other
warnings and alerts, are fully sufficient
to warn the driver of a low brake air
pressure situation.
DTNA concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety, and that its petition to be
exempted from providing notification of
the noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49
U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78261
the subject vehicles that DTNA no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after DTNA notified them that
the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–26764 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0092]
Pipeline Safety: Underground Natural
Gas Storage Facility User Fee
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of agency action and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
This notice is to advise all
underground natural gas storage facility
operators of a proposed PHMSA
pipeline user fee assessment and rate
structure.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Little by telephone at 202–366–
4569, by fax at 202–366–4566, by email
at Roger.Little@dot.gov, or by mail at
U.S. Department of Transportation,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
PHP–2, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Comments: PHMSA invites interested
persons to comment on the
underground natural gas storage facility
user fee assessment procedures
described in this notice by January 6,
2017. Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0092.
Comments may be submitted in the
following ways:
• E-Gov Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System,
U.S. Department of Transportation
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78259-78261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2016-0103; Notice 1]
Daimler Trucks North America, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Daimler Trucks North America (DTNA), has determined that
certain model year (MY) 2016-2017 Freightliner and Western Star trucks
do not fully comply with Table 2 of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 101, Controls and Displays. DTNA filed a report
dated September 22, 2016, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. DTNA also petitioned NHTSA on
September 22, 2016, under 49 CFR part 556 for a decision that the
subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle
safety.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is December 7,
2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h), 49 CFR
part 556, DTNA submitted a petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of DTNA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Vehicles Involved: Affected are approximately 36,959 MY 2016-
2017 versions of the following trucks, manufactured between September
28, 2015 and July 30, 2016:
Freightliner Cascadia
Freightliner 122SD
Freightliner Coronado
[[Page 78260]]
Western Star 5700
III. Noncompliance: DTNA explains that the noncompliance is that
the Low Brake Air Pressure telltale for air brake systems displays the
word ``BRAKE'' and a red International Standards Organization (ISO)
symbol for brake malfunction when a low air brake pressure condition
exists, rather than the words ``BRAKE AIR,'' as specified in Table 2 of
FMVSS No. 101. DTNA states that the telltale is accompanied by an
audible alert and low pressure gauge reading.
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5 of FMVSS No. 101 provides: ``Each
passenger car, multipurpose passenger vehicle, truck and bus that is
fitted with a control, a telltale, or an indicator listed in Table 1 or
Table 2 must meet the requirements of this standard for the location,
identification, color, and illumination of that control, telltale or
indicator.''
Paragraph S5.2.1 of FMVSS No. 101 provides, in pertinent part: ``.
. . each control, telltale and indicator that is listed in column 1 and
2 of Table 1 or Table 2 must be identified by the symbol specified for
it in column 2 or the word or abbreviation specified for it in column 3
of Table 1 or Table 2.''
Table 2 appears as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07NO16.001
BILLING CODE 4910-59-C
V. Summary of DTNA's Petition: DTNA described the subject
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, DTNA submitted the following reasoning:
(a) DTNA notes that the purpose of the low brake air pressure
telltale is to alert the driver to a low air condition, consistent with
the requirements of FMVSS No. 121, S5.1.5 (warning signal). The word
``BRAKE'' instead of ``BRAKE AIR,'' together with the audible alert
that occurs in the subject vehicles would still alert the driver to an
issue with the brake system. Once alerted, the driver can check the
actual air pressure by reading the primary and secondary air gauges and
seeing the contrasting color on the gauges indicating low pressure.
[[Page 78261]]
(b) NHTSA stated in a 2005 FMVSS No. 101 rulemaking that the reason
for including vehicles over 10,000 pounds in the requirements of FMVSS
No. 101 is that there is a need for drivers of heavier vehicles to see
and identify their displays, just as there is for drivers of lighter
vehicles. See 70 FR 48295, 48298 (Aug. 17, 2005). The telltale in the
subject vehicles saying ``BRAKE'' would allow the driver to see and
identify the improper functioning system as was the intent of the rule,
thus serving the purpose of the FMVSS No. 101 requirement.
(c) There are two scenarios when a low brake air pressure condition
would exist: A parked vehicle and a moving vehicle. Each of these are
discussed separately below; in each scenario, there is ample warning
provided to the driver of low brake air pressure.
a. Parked Vehicle
The driver of an air-braked vehicle must ensure that the vehicle
has enough brake air pressure to operate safely. At startup, the
vehicle will likely be in a low air condition. When in a low air
condition the following warnings would occur, conditioning the driver
over time as to the purpose of the telltale and audible alerts and
under what conditions they are activated.
Red contrasting color of the telltale saying ``BRAKE''.
Red contrasting color of the ISO symbol for brake
malfunction.
Audible alert to the driver as long as the vehicle has low
air.
Air gauges for the primary and secondary air tanks clearly
showing the air pressure in the system.
Red contrasting color on the air gauges indicating when
the pressure is low.
Difficulty/inability of releasing the parking brakes with
low air.
Reduced drivability if the driver attempts to drive with
the parking brakes applied.
b. Moving Vehicle
If a low brake air pressure situation occurs while driving, the
function of the service brakes may be reduced or lost and, eventually
if the pressure gets low enough, the parking brakes will engage. The
driver must pull to the side of the road and apply the parking brakes
as soon as possible. A loss of brake air pressure while driving
represents a malfunctioning brake system and requires immediate action
from the driver. Drivers recognize that a telltale illuminated in red
represents a malfunction which needs to be remedied.
The following warning would occur if a low air condition occurred
while driving.
Red contrasting color of the telltale saying ``BRAKE''.
Red contrasting color of the ISO symbol for brake
malfunction.
Audible alert to the driver as long as the vehicle has low
air.
Air gauges for the primary and secondary air tanks clearly
showing the air pressure in the system.
Red contrasting color on the air gauges indicating when
the pressure is low.
The functionality of both the parking brake system and the service
brake system remains unaffected by the ``BRAKE'' telltale used in the
subject vehicles.
(d) NHTSA Precedents--DTNA notes that NHTSA has previously granted
petitions for decisions of inconsequential noncompliance for similar
brake telltale issues, in which the ISO symbol in combination with
other available warnings was deemed sufficient to provide the necessary
driver warning. See Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0004, 78 FR 69931 (November
21, 2013) (grant of petition for Ford Motor Company) and Docket No.
NHTSA-2014-0046, 79 FR 78559 (December 30, 2014) (grant of petition for
Chrysler Group, LLC). In both of these instances, the vehicles at issue
displayed an ISO symbol for the brake telltale instead of the wording
required under FMVSS No. 101. The ISO symbol in combination with other
available warnings was deemed sufficient to provide the necessary
driver warning. DTNA respectfully suggests that the same is true for
the subject vehicles: The ISO symbol, together with other warnings and
alerts, are fully sufficient to warn the driver of a low brake air
pressure situation.
DTNA concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that DTNA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after DTNA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-26764 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P