Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 71482-71484 [2016-25057]

Download as PDF 71482 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Notices retroactively on any entries made on or after September 9, 2016, the date of publication of the Final Results, for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) No cash deposit will be required for subject merchandise exported by Fushun Jinly; (2) for subject merchandise exported by the Fangda Group and Xuzhou Jianglong, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the ‘‘Amended Final Results of Review’’ section; (3) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (4) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity, which is 159.64 percent; (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these amended final results to interested parties within five days after the public announcement of the amended final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:22 Oct 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These amended final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 19 CFR 351.224(e) of the Act. Dated: October 11, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–25059 Filed 10–14–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–520–804] Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: On June 10, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel nails (nails) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015. The review covers five producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise, Dubai Wire FZE (Dubai Wire), Oman Fasteners LLC (Oman Fasteners), Overseas Distribution Services Inc. (ODS), Overseas International Steel Industry LLC (OISI), and Precision Fasteners LLC (Precision). For these final results, we continue to find that subject merchandise has been sold in the United States at less than normal value. SUMMARY: DATES: Effective October 17, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3683, and (202) 482–1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 10, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain steel PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 nails from the UAE.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received case and rebuttal briefs from Mid Continent Steel and Wire, Inc., a domestic interested party, and ODS, the only mandatory respondent selected for individual examination in this review. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order 2 is nails from the UAE. The products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55, 7317.00.65, 7317.00.75, 7806.00.80.00 and 7907.00.60.00.3 While the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 Analysis of the Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) and is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete 1 See Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 37571 (June 10, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (collectively, Preliminary Results). 2 See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (Order). 3 On April 16, 2012, the Department added classification numbers 7806.00.80.00 and 7907.00.60.00 to the customs case reference file pursuant to a request by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 4 For a full description of the scope of the order, see the memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ‘‘Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM 17OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Notices version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Final Determination of No Shipments The Department preliminarily found that Oman Fasteners LLC, Overseas International Steel Industry LLC, and Precision Fasteners LLC, did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.5 After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or additional information with respect to these three companies. Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that these three companies did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on our final results. Rate for Respondent Not Selected for Individual Examination In these final results we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin above zero or de minimis for ODS, the sole respondent selected for individual examination.6 Accordingly, for these final results, we will assign to Dubai Wire FZE (Dubai Wire), a company not selected for individual examination in this review, the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for ODS, consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the Department’s analysis of comments received and further examination of the record, we made revisions to our margin calculations for ODS. As a result, the margins for ODS and Dubai Wire have changed. Final Results of the Review jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015: 5 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 6 Id. 7 Dubai Wire was not selected for individual examination in this review. Generally, we look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for respondents not selected for individual review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs that we are not to calculate an all-others rate using any zero or de minimis margins or any margins based on total facts available. Accordingly, our usual practice has been to average the rates for the selected companies excluding zero, de minimis, and rates based entirely on facts available. In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin above zero or de minimis for the sole VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:22 Oct 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 71483 for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior Overseas Distribution Servsegment of the proceeding, the cash ices Inc .............................. 0.87 deposit rate will continue to be the Dubai Wire FZE 7 .................. 0.87 company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is Disclosure not a firm covered in this review, a prior We intend to disclose the calculations review, or the original investigation but performed to parties in this proceeding the manufacturer is, the cash deposit within five days after public rate will be the rate established for the announcement of the final results, in most recent period for the manufacturer accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or Assessment Rates exporters will continue to be 4.30 Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the percent, the all-others rate established Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the in the Order.10 These cash deposit Department shall determine, and CBP requirements, when imposed, shall shall assess, antidumping duties on all remain in effect until further notice. appropriate entries covered by this review.8 Therefore, we will instruct CBP Notification to Importers to apply ad valorem assessment rate of This notice serves as a preliminary 0.87 percent, to all entries of subject reminder to importers of their merchandise during the POR which responsibility under 19 CFR were produced and/or exported by ODS. 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Consistent with our practice, because regarding the reimbursement of we continue to find that Oman antidumping duties prior to liquidation Fasteners, OISI, and Precision had no of the relevant entries during this shipments of subject merchandise to the review period. Failure to comply with United States in the final results of this this requirement could result in the review, we will instruct CBP to Secretary’s presumption that liquidate any existing entries of reimbursement of antidumping duties merchandise produced by Oman occurred and the subsequent assessment Fasteners, OISI, and Precision and of double antidumping duties. exported by other parties at the allAdministrative Protective Orders others rate.9 For Dubai Wire, the respondent not This notice also serves as the only selected for individual examination, we reminder to parties subject to will instruct CBP to apply the rate administrative protective order (APO) of assigned to ODS, to all entries of subject their responsibility concerning the merchandise produced and/or exported return or destruction of proprietary by Dubai Wire. information disclosed under APO in We intend to issue instructions to accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). CBP 15 days after publication of the Timely written notification of the return final results of this review. or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is Cash Deposit Requirements hereby requested. Failure to comply The following deposit requirements with the regulations and terms of an will be effective upon publication of the APO is a sanctionable violation. notice of final results of administrative These final results of review are review for all shipments of nails from issued and published in accordance the UAE entered, or withdrawn from with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the warehouse, for consumption on or after Act. the date of publication as provided by Dated: October 11, 2016. section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash Paul Piquado, deposit rate for ODS and Dubai Wire Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and will be the rates established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in respondent selected for individual examination, the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Margin (percent) Company ODS. Based on this, and analogous to the statutory provision concerning investigations, we assigned the rate calculated for ODS to Dubai Wire. 8 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 9 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Selection of Financial Statements to Calculate Constructed Value Selling Expenses and Profit 10 See E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM Order, 77 FR 27421, 27422. 17OCN1 71484 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Notices Comment 2: Errors in Calculation of Constructed Value Selling Expense and Profit Ratios Comment 3: Appropriate Universe of Sales Comment 4: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method Comment 5: Differential Pricing Analysis Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016–25057 Filed 10–14–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Special Accommodations RIN 0648–XE965 Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of open public meeting. AGENCY: This notice sets forth the proposed schedule and agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee (MAFAC). The members will discuss and provide advice on issues outlined under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below. DATES: The meeting will be held November 1–3, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 5 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sheraton Silver Spring Hotel, 8777 Georgia Ave, Silver Spring, MD 20910; 301–589–0800. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Lukens, MAFAC Executive Director; (301) 427–8004; email: Jennifer.Lukens@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As required by section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, notice is hereby given of a meeting of MAFAC. The MAFAC was established by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), and, since 1971, advises the Secretary on all living marine resource matters that are the responsibility of the Department of Commerce. The complete charter and summaries of prior meetings are located online at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ ocs/mafac/. jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: Matters To Be Considered This meeting time and agenda are subject to change. The meeting is convened to hear presentations and updates and to discuss policies and guidance on the following topics: proposed Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force; VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:22 Oct 14, 2016 Jkt 241001 aquaculture resilience benefits; regional vulnerability analyses; ecosystem based fisheries management; transition; Protected Resources program review and climate change guidance; climate science and regional action plans; recreational fisheries activities and socioeconomic science; and the budget outlook for FY2017–2018. MAFAC will discuss various administrative and organizational matters, and meetings of standing subcommittees and working groups will be convened. The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Heidi Lovett; 301–427–8034 by October 21, 2016. Dated: October 11, 2016. Jennifer Lukens, Director for the Office of Policy, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2016–24972 Filed 10–14–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XE961 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permit National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: The Regional Administrator, NMFS West Coast Region, has determined that an application for an exempted fishing permit (EFP) warrants further consideration and requests public comment on the application. The application requests 2-year exemptions from various prohibitions under the Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP) to test the effects and efficacy of using deep-set buoy gear (DSBG) to fish for swordfish and other highly migratory species (HMS) off the U.S. West Coast. This notice also announces NMFS’ intent to extend two current DSBG EFPs through 2018 and also requests public comment on these EFPs. DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by November 16, 2016. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA– NMFS–2016–0133, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20160133, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. EFP applications will be available under Relevant Documents through the same link. • Mail: Attn: Chris Fanning, NMFS West Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS– 2016–0133’’ in the comments. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Fanning, NMFS, West Coast Region, 562–980–4198. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August 2015 NMFS issued three EFPs for fishing vessels to use DSBG in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the U.S. West Coast (DSBG is described as multiple hooks deployed relatively deep in the water column, using one or more weighted mainlines which are suspended with one or more buoys floating on the ocean surface) (80 FR 29662, May 22, 2015). DSBG fishing under two of these EFPs has been ongoing in 2015–2016, and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) recommended these both be extended through the 2017–2018 fishing season (http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/03/0316decisions.pdf). In addition to the request for the two extensions, a new DSBG EFP application was submitted to the Council by Dave Stephens for two additional vessels to conduct DSBG fishing activities (herein referred to as the ‘‘Stephens EFP’’) (http:// www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/07/0616decisions.pdf). At its September 2016 meeting, the Council ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\17OCN1.SGM 17OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 200 (Monday, October 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71482-71484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-520-804]


Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 10, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain steel nails (nails) from the United 
Arab Emirates (UAE). The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2014, through 
April 30, 2015. The review covers five producers/exporters of the 
subject merchandise, Dubai Wire FZE (Dubai Wire), Oman Fasteners LLC 
(Oman Fasteners), Overseas Distribution Services Inc. (ODS), Overseas 
International Steel Industry LLC (OISI), and Precision Fasteners LLC 
(Precision). For these final results, we continue to find that subject 
merchandise has been sold in the United States at less than normal 
value.

DATES: Effective October 17, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3683, and (202) 482-
1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On June 10, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results 
of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain 
steel nails from the UAE.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment 
on the Preliminary Results. We received case and rebuttal briefs from 
Mid Continent Steel and Wire, Inc., a domestic interested party, and 
ODS, the only mandatory respondent selected for individual examination 
in this review. The Department conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-
2015, 81 FR 37571 (June 10, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum (collectively, Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order \2\ is nails from the UAE. The 
products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7317.00.55, 
7317.00.65, 7317.00.75, 7806.00.80.00 and 7907.00.60.00.\3\ While the 
HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Certain Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: 
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27421 (May 10, 2012) (Order).
    \3\ On April 16, 2012, the Department added classification 
numbers 7806.00.80.00 and 7907.00.60.00 to the customs case 
reference file pursuant to a request by U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP).
    \4\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see the 
memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to 
Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ``Certain Steel Nails 
from the United Arab Emirates: Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-
2015,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of the Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues is attached to this notice as an 
appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) 
and is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. The 
Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete

[[Page 71483]]

version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    The Department preliminarily found that Oman Fasteners LLC, 
Overseas International Steel Industry LLC, and Precision Fasteners LLC, 
did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR.\5\ After the Preliminary Results, we received no comments or 
additional information with respect to these three companies. 
Therefore, for these final results, we continue to find that these 
three companies did not have any reviewable entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR. Consistent with our practice, we will issue 
appropriate instructions to CBP based on our final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum at 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Respondent Not Selected for Individual Examination

    In these final results we calculated a weighted-average dumping 
margin above zero or de minimis for ODS, the sole respondent selected 
for individual examination.\6\ Accordingly, for these final results, we 
will assign to Dubai Wire FZE (Dubai Wire), a company not selected for 
individual examination in this review, the weighted-average dumping 
margin calculated for ODS, consistent with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the 
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the Department's analysis of comments received and further 
examination of the record, we made revisions to our margin calculations 
for ODS. As a result, the margins for ODS and Dubai Wire have changed.

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the 
following estimated weighted-average dumping margins exist for the 
period May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Dubai Wire was not selected for individual examination in 
this review. Generally, we look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 
which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in 
an investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for 
respondents not selected for individual review. Section 735(c)(5)(A) 
of the Act instructs that we are not to calculate an all-others rate 
using any zero or de minimis margins or any margins based on total 
facts available. Accordingly, our usual practice has been to average 
the rates for the selected companies excluding zero, de minimis, and 
rates based entirely on facts available. In this review, we 
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin above zero or de 
minimis for the sole respondent selected for individual examination, 
ODS. Based on this, and analogous to the statutory provision 
concerning investigations, we assigned the rate calculated for ODS 
to Dubai Wire.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Margin
                         Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overseas Distribution Services Inc......................            0.87
Dubai Wire FZE \7\......................................            0.87
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final 
results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\8\ Therefore, 
we will instruct CBP to apply ad valorem assessment rate of 0.87 
percent, to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which 
were produced and/or exported by ODS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with our practice, because we continue to find that Oman 
Fasteners, OISI, and Precision had no shipments of subject merchandise 
to the United States in the final results of this review, we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced 
by Oman Fasteners, OISI, and Precision and exported by other parties at 
the all-others rate.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Dubai Wire, the respondent not selected for individual 
examination, we will instruct CBP to apply the rate assigned to ODS, to 
all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Dubai 
Wire.
    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of nails from the UAE entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 
ODS and Dubai Wire will be the rates established in the final results 
of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a 
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) 
if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, 
or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 4.30 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the Order.\10\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Order, 77 FR 27421, 27422.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    These final results of review are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: October 11, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Selection of Financial Statements to Calculate 
Constructed Value Selling Expenses and Profit

[[Page 71484]]

    Comment 2: Errors in Calculation of Constructed Value Selling 
Expense and Profit Ratios
    Comment 3: Appropriate Universe of Sales
    Comment 4: Consideration of an Alternative Comparison Method
    Comment 5: Differential Pricing Analysis
Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-25057 Filed 10-14-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P