Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a New Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for Sub-MPV Split-Priced Orders, 69877-69878 [2016-24277]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Three, how resting non-displayed orders
would trade, how order with a STPN
Modifier would be handled, and that gQuotes and Buy Minus/Zero Plus orders
will be rejected. The Exchange also
proposes to only permit buy and sell
orders that are entered into the Cross
Function pursuant to Supplementary
Material .10 to Rule 76 to be eligible for
the Block Size order exception to the
Trade-at Prohibition.38
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
amend provisions related to two
exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition.
First, the Exchange proposes amend the
TAISO definition to reflect that ISOs
may be routed to the full displayed size
of a Protected Quotation that is tradedat and to make the corresponding
change to the specific trade-at
exception. Second, the Exchange
proposes to amend the exception for
Block Size orders to allow an order of
Block Size to be executed on multiple
Trading Centers.
The Commission believes that these
changes are reasonably designed to
comply with the Plan. Further, the
Commission believes that the proposed
changes that are targeted at particular
Test Groups are necessary for
compliance with the Plan. Accordingly,
the Commission finds that these
changes are consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act 39 and Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS 40 because they
implement the Plan and clarify
Exchange Rules.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
adopt a rule to specify how the
Exchange will calculate LULD Price
Bands after the Exchange opens or
reopens. The Commission believes that
this change should help to ensure that
trading does not occur outside of Price
Bands when LULD is in effect.
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
specify that Trading Collars that are not
in the MPV would be rounded down to
the nearest price. The Commission
believes that this change should provide
clarity in the Exchange’s rules.
For these reasons, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 2, is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS.
38 The Commission notes that the orders entered
into the Cross Function for purposes of relying on
the Block Size exception must satisfy the provisions
of the exception, including that it may not be an
aggregation of non-block orders, or broken into
orders smaller than Block Size prior to submitting
the order the Trading Center for execution. See
Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(iii).
39 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
40 17 CFR 242.608.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
V. Solicitation of Comments on
Amendment No. 2
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether Amendment No. 2 is
consistent with the Exchange Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–83 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–83. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–83 and should be
submitted on or before October 28,
2016.
VI. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 2
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change, as
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69877
modified by Amendment No. 2, prior to
the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice of Amendment No.
2 in the Federal Register. As described
above, the Exchange proposes to amend
its rules to comply with the Plan and
clarify other rules related to LULD and
Trading Collars.
The Commission believes that the
proposals related to LULD Price Bands
and Trading Collars should provide
clarity on instances where they are not
in the MPV. The Commission believes
that the proposals related to the Pilot are
designed to ensure compliance with the
Plan. The Commission notes that the
Pilot is scheduled to start on October 3,
2016, and accelerated approval would
ensure that the rules of the Exchange
would be in place for the start of the
Pilot. Accordingly, the Commission
finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,41 to approve the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2, on an accelerated
basis.
VII. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered that, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,42 the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEMKT–
2016–83), as modified by Amendment
No. 2, be and hereby is approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.43
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–24283 Filed 10–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79023; File No. SR–Phlx–
2016–82]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on a Proposed
Rule Change To Adopt a New
Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for
Sub-MPV Split-Priced Orders
October 3, 2016.
On August 3, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX
LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
41 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
42 Id.
43 17
1 15
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
07OCN1
69878
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Notices
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
provide an exception to the mandatory
use of the Floor Broker Management
System pursuant to Rule 1000(f)(iii) to
permit Floor Brokers to execute certain
sub-minimum price variation (‘‘subMPV’’) split-priced orders in the options
trading crowd rather than electronically.
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on August 22, 2016.3 The
Commission has received no comment
letters on the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of the notice of the filing of a proposed
rule change, or within such longer
period up to 90 days as the Commission
may designate if it finds such longer
period to be appropriate and publishes
its reasons for so finding or as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either
approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved. The 45th day for
this filing is October 6, 2016.
The Commission is extending the 45day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider and take action on the
Exchange’s proposed rule change.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act 5 and for the
reasons stated above, the Commission
designates November 20, 2016, as the
date by which the Commission should
either approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove, the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–Phlx–2016–
82).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–24277 Filed 10–6–16; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
2 17
CFR 240.19b–4.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78593
(August 16, 2016), 81 FR 56724.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
3 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Oct 06, 2016
Jkt 241001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–79030; File No. SR–NYSE–
2016–62]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Partial Amendment No. 2 and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Partial Amendment No. 2,
To Amend Rule 67 Relating to the Tick
Size Pilot Program
October 3, 2016.
I. Introduction
On August 25, 2016, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to: (1) Change system
functionality to implement the Plan to
Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program
(‘‘Plan’’ or ‘‘Pilot’’) 3 submitted to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS 4 under the Act; (2)
clarify the operation of certain
exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition 5
on Pilot Securities in Test Group Three;
(3) amend the Limit Up/Limit Down
(‘‘LULD’’) price controls set forth in
Exchange Rule 80C regarding the
Regulation NMS Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility (‘‘LULD
Plan’’); 6 and (4) amend the Exchange’s
trading collar calculation in Exchange
Rule 1000. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on September 15,
2016.7 The Commission received two
comments letter on the proposal.8 On
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892
(May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015)
(‘‘Approval Order’’). Unless otherwise specified,
capitalized terms used in this order are defined as
set forth in the Plan.
4 17 CFR 242.608.
5 Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(A) defines the ‘‘Trade-at
Prohibition’’ as the prohibition against executions
by a Trading Center of a sell order for a Pilot
Security at the price of a Protected Bid or the
execution of a buy order for a Pilot Security at the
price of a Protected Offer during regular trading
hours. See also Plan Section I(LL) and Plan Section
VI(D).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (File
No. 4–631).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78802
(September 9, 2016), 81 FR 63515.
8 See Letters from Eric Swanson, EVP, General
Counsel, Bats Global Markets, Inc., Elizabeth K.
King, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
New York Stock Exchange; and Thomas A.
Wittman, EVP, Global Head of Equities, Nasdaq,
Inc., dated September 9, 2016 (‘‘Comment Letter
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
September 27, 2016, the Exchange filed
Partial Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change (‘‘Amendment No.
1’’). On September 30, 2016, the
Exchange withdrew Amendment No. 1
and filed Partial Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change (‘‘Amendment
No. 2’’).9
This order provides notice of
Amendment No. 2, and approves the
proposal, as modified by Amendment
No. 2, on an accelerated basis.
II. Description of the Amended
Proposal
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 67 to: (1) Change system
functionality to implement the Plan; (2)
clarify the operation of certain
exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition
on Pilot Securities in Test Group Three;
(3) amend the LULD price controls set
forth in Exchange Rule 80C; and (4)
amend the Exchange’s trading collar
calculation set forth in Exchange Rule
1000.
A. Amendments to Exchange Systems
Functionality To Implement the Plan
1. Trade-at Intermarket Sweep Order 10
The Exchange proposes to accept
Trade-at Intermarket Sweep Orders
(‘‘TAISO’’) in all securities, and that
TAISOs must be designated as
immediate or cancel (‘‘IOC’’), may
include a minimum trade size, and do
not route. The Exchange would
immediately and automatically execute
a TAISO against the displayed and nondisplayed bid (offer) up to its full size
in accordance with and to the extent
provided by Exchange Rules 1000—
1004 and will then sweep the
Exchange’s book as provided in Rule
1000(e)(iii), and the portion not so
executed will be immediately and
automatically cancelled. The Exchange
would accept TAISOs before the
Exchange opens and would allow
TAISOs to be eligible to participate in
the opening transaction at its limit
price, but would not be accept TAISOs
during a trading halt or pause for
participation in a reopening transaction.
Finally, the Exchange would not allow
TAISOs to be entered as e-Quotes, dQuotes, or g-Quotes.
No. 1’’); and Eric Swanson, EVP, General Counsel,
Bats Global Markets, Inc., dated September 12, 2016
(‘‘Comment Letter No. 2’’).
9 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange proposes to:
(1) Specify that in all Pilot Securities, d-Quotes to
buy (sell) would not exercise discretion if (A)
exercising discretion would result in an execution
equal to or higher (lower) than the price of a
protected offer (bid) or (B) the price of a protected
bid (offer) is equal to or higher (lower) than the filed
price of the d-Quote; and (2) correct cross
references.
10 See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(1).
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69877-69878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24277]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-79023; File No. SR-Phlx-2016-82]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Adopt a New Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for Sub-MPV
Split-Priced Orders
October 3, 2016.
On August 3, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4
[[Page 69878]]
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to provide an exception to the
mandatory use of the Floor Broker Management System pursuant to Rule
1000(f)(iii) to permit Floor Brokers to execute certain sub-minimum
price variation (``sub-MPV'') split-priced orders in the options
trading crowd rather than electronically. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on August 22, 2016.\3\
The Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78593 (August 16,
2016), 81 FR 56724.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of the notice of the filing of a proposed rule change,
or within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing is October 6, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider and
take action on the Exchange's proposed rule change.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act \5\
and for the reasons stated above, the Commission designates November
20, 2016, as the date by which the Commission should either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-Phlx-2016-82).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
\6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-24277 Filed 10-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P