Pure Magnesium From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review, 68046-68049 [2016-23717]
Download as PDF
68046
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Bela Hubbard in 1885. No known
individuals were identified.
Determinations Made by the Peabody
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology
Officials of the Peabody Museum of
Archaeology and Ethnology have
determined that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described in this notice
are Native American based on
osteological examination, museum
records, and/or archeological context.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described in this notice
represent the physical remains of 27
individuals of Native American
ancestry.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a
relationship of shared group identity
cannot be reasonably traced between the
Native American human remains and
any present-day Indian tribe.
• According to final judgments of the
Indian Claims Commission or the Court
of Federal Claims, Treaties, Acts of
Congress, or Executive Orders, the land
from which the Native American human
remains were removed is the aboriginal
land of the Bad River Band of the Lake
Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of
the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin;
Bay Mills Indian Community, Michigan;
Bois Forte Band (Nett Lake) of the
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota;
Chippewa Cree Indians of the Rocky
Boy’s Reservation, Montana (previously
listed as the Chippewa-Cree Indians of
the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, Montana);
Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Oklahoma;
Fond du Lac Band of the Minnesota
Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota; Forest
County Potawatomi Community,
Wisconsin; Grand Portage Band of the
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota;
Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and
Chippewa Indians, Michigan;
Hannahville Indian Community,
Michigan; Keweenaw Bay Indian
Community, Michigan; Lac Courte
Oreilles Band of Lake Superior
Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin; Lac du
Flambeau Band of Lake Superior
Chippewa Indians of the Lac du
Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin; Lac
Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior
Chippewa Indians of Michigan; Leech
Lake Band of the Minnesota Chippewa
Tribe, Minnesota; Little River Band of
Ottawa Indians, Michigan; Little
Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians;
Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of
Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan; Mille
Lacs Band of the Minnesota Chippewa
Tribe, Minnesota; Nottawaseppi Huron
Band of the Potawatomi, Michigan
(previously listed as the Huron
Potawatomi, Inc.); Ottawa Tribe of
Oklahoma; Pokagon Band of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
Potawatomi Indians, Michigan and
Indiana; Prairie Band of Potawatomi
Nation, Kansas; Red Cliff Band of Lake
Superior Chippewa Indians of
Wisconsin; Red Lake Band of Chippewa
Indians, Minnesota; Saginaw Chippewa
Indian Tribe of Michigan; Sault Ste.
Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians,
Michigan; Sokaogon Chippewa
Community, Wisconsin; St. Croix
Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin; Turtle
Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of
North Dakota; White Earth Band of
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Minnesota;
and Wyandotte Nation, Oklahoma
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘The
Aboriginal Land Tribes’’).
• Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the
disposition of the human remains may
be The Aboriginal Land Tribes.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice that wish to
request transfer of control of these
human remains should submit a written
request with information in support of
the request to Patricia Capone, Museum
Curator and Director of Research and
Repatriation, Peabody Museum of
Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard
University, 11 Divinity Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02138, telephone (617)
496–3702, email pcapone@
fas.harvard.edu by November 2, 2016.
After that date, if no additional
requestors have come forward, transfer
of control of the human remains to The
Aboriginal Land Tribes may proceed.
The Peabody Museum of Archaeology
and Ethnology is responsible for
notifying The Invited and Consulted
Tribes that this notice has been
published.
Dated: September 19, 2016.
Melanie O’Brien,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2016–23813 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–696 (Fourth
Review)]
Pure Magnesium From China;
Institution of a Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on pure magnesium from
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission.
DATES: Effective October 3, 2016. To be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is November 2, 2016.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission
December 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On May 12, 1995, the
Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
pure magnesium from China (60 FR
25691). Following first five-year reviews
by Commerce and the Commission,
effective October 27, 2000, Commerce
issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
pure magnesium from China (65 FR
64422). Following second five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective July 10, 2006,
Commerce issued a continuation of the
antidumping duty order on imports of
pure magnesium from China (71 FR
38860). Following the third five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective November 22,
2011, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on
imports of pure magnesium from China
(76 FR 72172). The Commission is now
conducting a fourth review pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Act, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine
whether revocation of the order would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to the
domestic industry within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Provisions concerning
the conduct of this proceeding may be
found in the Commission’s Rules of
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts
201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR part
207, subparts A and F. The Commission
will assess the adequacy of interested
party responses to this notice of
institution to determine whether to
conduct a full review or an expedited
review. The Commission’s
determination in any expedited review
will be based on the facts available,
which may include information
provided in response to this notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In the original
determinations underlying this review,
the Commission found pure and alloy
magnesium to be separate Domestic Like
Products. In the first five-year review of
this order, the Commission continued to
define the Domestic Like Product as
pure magnesium. In the second five-year
review of this order, the Commission
was evenly divided on the question of
whether pure and alloy magnesium
were one or two Domestic Like
Products. The three Commissioners that
found a single Domestic Like Product
also found that primary and secondary
magnesium, and cast and granular
magnesium, were part of a single
domestic like product, i.e., they
expanded the domestic like product to
encompass secondary magnesium and
granular magnesium. For the other three
Commissioners that found two Domestic
Like Products, the question of whether
to include secondary magnesium in the
like product affected only the alloy
magnesium like product, and they
expanded that Domestic Like Product to
include secondary magnesium but
declined to expand the Domestic Like
Product to encompass granular
magnesium. In the third five-year
review of this order, the Commission
defined the Domestic Like Product as
consisting of pure and alloy magnesium,
including primary and secondary
magnesium and cast and granular
magnesium. For purposes of responding
to the items in this notice, please
provide the requested information
separately for the following two
Domestic Like Product definitions: (1)
All pure magnesium ingot, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
off-spec pure magnesium 1 and (2) pure
and alloy magnesium, including
primary and secondary magnesium, and
magnesium in ingot and granular form.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In the original determination
and the first five-year review
determination, the Commission defined
the Domestic Industry as consisting of
all domestic producers of pure
magnesium. In the second five-year
review, those Commissioners who
defined the Domestic Like Product as
including pure and alloy magnesium
defined the Domestic Industry as
consisting of the domestic producers of
pure and alloy magnesium, including
primary and secondary magnesium, and
magnesium in ingot and granular form,
including grinders. Those
Commissioners who found pure and
alloy magnesium to be separate
Domestic Like Products defined the
Domestic Industry producing pure
magnesium as consisting of the sole
domestic producer of pure magnesium
at that time, U.S. Magnesium. In the
third five-year review of this order, the
Commission defined the Domestic
Industry as consisting of all domestic
producers of pure and alloy magnesium,
including primary and secondary
magnesium, and magnesium in ingot
and granular form.2 For purposes of
responding to the items in this notice,
please provide the requested
information separately for the following
two Domestic Industry definitions: (1)
All producers of pure magnesium ingot,
including off-spec pure magnesium and
(2) all producers of pure and alloy
magnesium, including primary and
secondary magnesium, and magnesium
in ingot and granular form.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
1 Off-spec pure magnesium is magnesium
containing between 50 percent and 99.8 percent
primary magnesium, by weight, that does not
conform to ASTM specifications for alloy
magnesium. Off-spec pure magnesium is pure
primary magnesium containing magnesium scrap,
secondary magnesium, oxidized magnesium, or
impurities (whether or not intentionally added) that
cause the primary magnesium content to fall below
99.8 percent by weight. It generally does not
contain, individually or in combination, 1.5 percent
or more, by weight, of the following alloying
elements: aluminum, manganese, zinc, silicon,
thorium, zirconium, and rare earths.
2 At that time, 10 producers of the Domestic Like
Product were identified: U.S. Magnesium, MagPro,
AMACOR, MagReTech, Rossborough, ESM Group,
Hart Metals, Reade Advanced Materials, Meridian
Technologies, and Spartan.
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68047
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the proceeding and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the proceeding as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an
earlier review of the same underlying
investigation. The Commission’s
designated agency ethics official has
advised that a five-year review is not the
same particular matter as the underlying
original investigation, and a five-year
review is not the same particular matter
as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of
18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
statute for Federal employees, and
Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR
201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014),
73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008).
Consequently, former employees are not
required to seek Commission approval
to appear in a review under Commission
rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the
corresponding underlying original
investigation or an earlier review of the
same underlying investigation was
pending when they were Commission
employees. For further ethics advice on
this matter, contact Carol McCue
Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official,
at 202–205–3088.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and APO service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
submitted in this proceeding available
to authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the proceeding, provided that
the application is made no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the proceeding. A
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
68048
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
separate service list will be maintained
by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the
APO.
Certification.—Pursuant to section
207.3 of the Commission’s rules, any
person submitting information to the
Commission in connection with this
proceeding must certify that the
information is accurate and complete to
the best of the submitter’s knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter
will acknowledge that information
submitted in response to this request for
information and throughout this
proceeding or other proceeding may be
disclosed to and used: (i) By the
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All contract personnel will
sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements.
Written submissions.—Pursuant to
section 207.61 of the Commission’s
rules, each interested party response to
this notice must provide the information
specified below. The deadline for filing
such responses is November 2, 2016.
Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission’s rules, eligible parties (as
specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments
concerning the adequacy of responses to
the notice of institution and whether the
Commission should conduct an
expedited or full review. The deadline
for filing such comments is December
15, 2016. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section
201.8 of the Commission’s rules; any
submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
Handbook on E-Filing, available on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing. Also, in accordance
with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the
Commission’s rules, each document
filed by a party to the proceeding must
be served on all other parties to the
proceeding (as identified by either the
public or APO service list as
appropriate), and a certificate of service
must accompany the document (if you
are not a party to the proceeding you do
not need to serve your response).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
No response to this request for
information is required if a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No.
16–5–368, expiration date June 30,
2017. Public reporting burden for the
request is estimated to average 15 hours
per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden
estimate to the Office of Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
Inability to provide requested
information.—Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission’s rules, any
interested party that cannot furnish the
information requested by this notice in
the requested form and manner shall
notify the Commission at the earliest
possible time, provide a full explanation
of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative
forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested
party does not provide this notification
(or the Commission finds the
explanation provided in the notification
inadequate) and fails to provide a
complete response to this notice, the
Commission may take an adverse
inference against the party pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677e(b)) in making its determination in
the review.
Information to be Provided in
Response to This Notice of Institution:
Please provide the requested
information separately for each of the
following Domestic Like Product,
definitions: (1) All pure magnesium
ingot, including off-spec pure
magnesium and (2) pure and alloy
magnesium, including primary and
secondary magnesium, and magnesium
in ingot and granular form. As used
below, the term ‘‘firm’’ includes any
related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm
or entity (including World Wide Web
address) and name, telephone number,
fax number, and Email address of the
certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is an interested party
under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how,
including whether your firm/entity is a
U.S. producer of the Domestic Like
Product, a U.S. union or worker group,
a U.S. importer of the Subject
Merchandise, a foreign producer or
exporter of the Subject Merchandise, a
U.S. or foreign trade or business
association (a majority of whose
members are interested parties under
the statute), or another interested party
(including an explanation). If you are a
union/worker group or trade/business
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
association, identify the firms in which
your workers are employed or which are
members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether
your firm/entity is willing to participate
in this proceeding by providing
information requested by the
Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of
the revocation of the antidumping duty
order on the Domestic Industry in
general and/or your firm/entity
specifically. In your response, please
discuss the various factors specified in
section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1675a(a)) including the likely volume of
subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of
imports of Subject Merchandise on the
Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. producers of the
Domestic Like Product. Identify any
known related parties and the nature of
the relationship as defined in section
771(4)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently
operating U.S. importers of the Subject
Merchandise and producers of the
Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country that currently export or have
exported Subject Merchandise to the
United States or other countries after
2010.
(7) A list of 3–5 leading purchasers in
the U.S. market for the Domestic Like
Product and the Subject Merchandise
(including street address, World Wide
Web address, and the name, telephone
number, fax number, and Email address
of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of
information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or
the Subject Merchandise in the U.S. or
other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the
Domestic Like Product, provide the
following information on your firm’s
operations on that product during
calendar year 2015, except as noted
(report quantity data in metric tons and
value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant).
If you are a union/worker group or
trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for
the firms in which your workers are
employed/which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total U.S. production of the Domestic
Like Product accounted for by your
firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to
produce the Domestic Like Product (i.e.,
the level of production that your
establishment(s) could reasonably have
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Notices
expected to attain during the year,
assuming normal operating conditions
(using equipment and machinery in
place and ready to operate), normal
operating levels (hours per week/weeks
per year), time for downtime,
maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a
typical or representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S.
commercial shipments of the Domestic
Like Product produced in your U.S.
plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S.
internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s); and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost
of goods sold (COGS), (iii) gross profit,
(iv) selling, general and administrative
(SG&A) expenses, and (v) operating
income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include
both U.S. and export commercial sales,
internal consumption, and company
transfers) for your most recently
completed fiscal year (identify the date
on which your fiscal year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a
trade/business association of U.S.
importers of the Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country, provide the
following information on your firm’s(s’)
operations on that product during
calendar year 2015 (report quantity data
in metric tons and value data in U.S.
dollars). If you are a trade/business
association, provide the information, on
an aggregate basis, for the firms which
are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed,
duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports
and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of
Subject Merchandise from the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’)
imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. commercial shipments of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject
Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S.
port, including antidumping duties) of
U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of Subject Merchandise
imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter,
or a trade/business association of
producers or exporters of the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country,
provide the following information on
your firm’s(s’) operations on that
product during calendar year 2015
(report quantity data in metric tons and
value data in U.S. dollars, landed and
duty-paid at the U.S. port but not
including antidumping duties). If you
are a trade/business association, provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:56 Sep 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
the information, on an aggregate basis,
for the firms which are members of your
association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if
known, an estimate of the percentage of
total production of Subject Merchandise
in the Subject Country accounted for by
your firm’s(s’) production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s)
to produce the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country (i.e., the level of
production that your establishment(s)
could reasonably have expected to
attain during the year, assuming normal
operating conditions (using equipment
and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours
per week/weeks per year), time for
downtime, maintenance, repair, and
cleanup, and a typical or representative
product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your
firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of
Subject Merchandise and, if known, an
estimate of the percentage of total
exports to the United States of Subject
Merchandise from the Subject Country
accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if
any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the
Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the
market for the Subject Merchandise in
the Subject Country after 2010, and
significant changes, if any, that are
likely to occur within a reasonably
foreseeable time. Supply conditions to
consider include technology;
production methods; development
efforts; ability to increase production
(including the shift of production
facilities used for other products and the
use, cost, or availability of major inputs
into production); and factors related to
the ability to shift supply among
different national markets (including
barriers to importation in foreign
markets or changes in market demand
abroad). Demand conditions to consider
include end uses and applications; the
existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition
among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject
Merchandise produced in the Subject
Country, and such merchandise from
other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of
whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product
and Domestic Industry; if you disagree
with either or both of these definitions,
please explain why and provide
alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68049
pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2016.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2016–23717 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1091 (Second
Review)]
Artists’ Canvas From China; Institution
of a Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether revocation of the antidumping
duty order on artists’ canvas from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission.
DATES: Effective October 3, 2016. To be
assured of consideration, the deadline
for responses is November 2, 2016.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission
December 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On June 1, 2006, the
Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
artists’ canvas from China (71 FR
31154). Following the first five-year
reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective November 9,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03OCN1.SGM
03OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68046-68049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23717]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-696 (Fourth Review)]
Pure Magnesium From China; Institution of a Five-Year Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a
review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the Act''), as amended, to
determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on pure
magnesium from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission.
DATES: Effective October 3, 2016. To be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is November 2, 2016. Comments on the adequacy of
responses may be filed with the Commission December 15, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On May 12, 1995, the Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of pure magnesium from China (60 FR
25691). Following first five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective October 27, 2000, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on imports of pure magnesium from China
(65 FR 64422). Following second five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective July 10, 2006, Commerce issued a continuation of
the antidumping duty order on imports of pure magnesium from China (71
FR 38860). Following the third five-year reviews by Commerce and the
Commission, effective November 22, 2011, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on imports of pure magnesium from China
(76 FR 72172). The Commission is now conducting a fourth review
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
to determine whether revocation of the order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry
within a reasonably foreseeable time. Provisions concerning the conduct
of this proceeding may be found in the Commission's Rules of
[[Page 68047]]
Practice and Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts A and B and 19 CFR
part 207, subparts A and F. The Commission will assess the adequacy of
interested party responses to this notice of institution to determine
whether to conduct a full review or an expedited review. The
Commission's determination in any expedited review will be based on the
facts available, which may include information provided in response to
this notice.
Definitions.--The following definitions apply to this review:
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or kind of merchandise that is
within the scope of the five-year review, as defined by the Department
of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the domestically produced product
or products which are like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the Subject Merchandise. In the original
determinations underlying this review, the Commission found pure and
alloy magnesium to be separate Domestic Like Products. In the first
five-year review of this order, the Commission continued to define the
Domestic Like Product as pure magnesium. In the second five-year review
of this order, the Commission was evenly divided on the question of
whether pure and alloy magnesium were one or two Domestic Like
Products. The three Commissioners that found a single Domestic Like
Product also found that primary and secondary magnesium, and cast and
granular magnesium, were part of a single domestic like product, i.e.,
they expanded the domestic like product to encompass secondary
magnesium and granular magnesium. For the other three Commissioners
that found two Domestic Like Products, the question of whether to
include secondary magnesium in the like product affected only the alloy
magnesium like product, and they expanded that Domestic Like Product to
include secondary magnesium but declined to expand the Domestic Like
Product to encompass granular magnesium. In the third five-year review
of this order, the Commission defined the Domestic Like Product as
consisting of pure and alloy magnesium, including primary and secondary
magnesium and cast and granular magnesium. For purposes of responding
to the items in this notice, please provide the requested information
separately for the following two Domestic Like Product definitions: (1)
All pure magnesium ingot, including off-spec pure magnesium \1\ and (2)
pure and alloy magnesium, including primary and secondary magnesium,
and magnesium in ingot and granular form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Off-spec pure magnesium is magnesium containing between 50
percent and 99.8 percent primary magnesium, by weight, that does not
conform to ASTM specifications for alloy magnesium. Off-spec pure
magnesium is pure primary magnesium containing magnesium scrap,
secondary magnesium, oxidized magnesium, or impurities (whether or
not intentionally added) that cause the primary magnesium content to
fall below 99.8 percent by weight. It generally does not contain,
individually or in combination, 1.5 percent or more, by weight, of
the following alloying elements: aluminum, manganese, zinc, silicon,
thorium, zirconium, and rare earths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. producers as a whole of the
Domestic Like Product, or those producers whose collective output of
the Domestic Like Product constitutes a major proportion of the total
domestic production of the product. In the original determination and
the first five-year review determination, the Commission defined the
Domestic Industry as consisting of all domestic producers of pure
magnesium. In the second five-year review, those Commissioners who
defined the Domestic Like Product as including pure and alloy magnesium
defined the Domestic Industry as consisting of the domestic producers
of pure and alloy magnesium, including primary and secondary magnesium,
and magnesium in ingot and granular form, including grinders. Those
Commissioners who found pure and alloy magnesium to be separate
Domestic Like Products defined the Domestic Industry producing pure
magnesium as consisting of the sole domestic producer of pure magnesium
at that time, U.S. Magnesium. In the third five-year review of this
order, the Commission defined the Domestic Industry as consisting of
all domestic producers of pure and alloy magnesium, including primary
and secondary magnesium, and magnesium in ingot and granular form.\2\
For purposes of responding to the items in this notice, please provide
the requested information separately for the following two Domestic
Industry definitions: (1) All producers of pure magnesium ingot,
including off-spec pure magnesium and (2) all producers of pure and
alloy magnesium, including primary and secondary magnesium, and
magnesium in ingot and granular form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ At that time, 10 producers of the Domestic Like Product were
identified: U.S. Magnesium, MagPro, AMACOR, MagReTech, Rossborough,
ESM Group, Hart Metals, Reade Advanced Materials, Meridian
Technologies, and Spartan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5) An Importer is any person or firm engaged, either directly or
through a parent company or subsidiary, in importing the Subject
Merchandise into the United States from a foreign manufacturer or
through its selling agent.
Participation in the proceeding and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the Subject Merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in the proceeding as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the Commission's rules, no later
than 21 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
The Secretary will maintain a public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they may appear in a review even if
they participated personally and substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation. The Commission's designated agency ethics
official has advised that a five-year review is not the same particular
matter as the underlying original investigation, and a five-year review
is not the same particular matter as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 207, the post
employment statute for Federal employees, and Commission rule 201.15(b)
(19 CFR 201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 73 FR 24609 (May 5,
2008). Consequently, former employees are not required to seek
Commission approval to appear in a review under Commission rule 19 CFR
201.15, even if the corresponding underlying original investigation or
an earlier review of the same underlying investigation was pending when
they were Commission employees. For further ethics advice on this
matter, contact Carol McCue Verratti, Deputy Agency Ethics Official, at
202-205-3088.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and APO service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI submitted in this proceeding available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the proceeding, provided that the
application is made no later than 21 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined in 19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to
the proceeding. A
[[Page 68048]]
separate service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Certification.--Pursuant to section 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, any person submitting information to the Commission in
connection with this proceeding must certify that the information is
accurate and complete to the best of the submitter's knowledge. In
making the certification, the submitter will acknowledge that
information submitted in response to this request for information and
throughout this proceeding or other proceeding may be disclosed to and
used: (i) By the Commission, its employees and Offices, and contract
personnel (a) for developing or maintaining the records of this or a
related proceeding, or (b) in internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5 U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract personnel, solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All contract personnel will sign appropriate nondisclosure
agreements.
Written submissions.--Pursuant to section 207.61 of the
Commission's rules, each interested party response to this notice must
provide the information specified below. The deadline for filing such
responses is November 2, 2016. Pursuant to section 207.62(b) of the
Commission's rules, eligible parties (as specified in Commission rule
207.62(b)(1)) may also file comments concerning the adequacy of
responses to the notice of institution and whether the Commission
should conduct an expedited or full review. The deadline for filing
such comments is December 15, 2016. All written submissions must
conform with the provisions of section 201.8 of the Commission's rules;
any submissions that contain BPI must also conform with the
requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's
rules. The Commission's Handbook on E-Filing, available on the
Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov, elaborates upon the
Commission's rules with respect to electronic filing. Also, in
accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's rules,
each document filed by a party to the proceeding must be served on all
other parties to the proceeding (as identified by either the public or
APO service list as appropriate), and a certificate of service must
accompany the document (if you are not a party to the proceeding you do
not need to serve your response).
No response to this request for information is required if a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number is not
displayed; the OMB number is 3117 0016/USITC No. 16-5-368, expiration
date June 30, 2017. Public reporting burden for the request is
estimated to average 15 hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to the Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436.
Inability to provide requested information.--Pursuant to section
207.61(c) of the Commission's rules, any interested party that cannot
furnish the information requested by this notice in the requested form
and manner shall notify the Commission at the earliest possible time,
provide a full explanation of why it cannot provide the requested
information, and indicate alternative forms in which it can provide
equivalent information. If an interested party does not provide this
notification (or the Commission finds the explanation provided in the
notification inadequate) and fails to provide a complete response to
this notice, the Commission may take an adverse inference against the
party pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677e(b)) in
making its determination in the review.
Information to be Provided in Response to This Notice of
Institution: Please provide the requested information separately for
each of the following Domestic Like Product, definitions: (1) All pure
magnesium ingot, including off-spec pure magnesium and (2) pure and
alloy magnesium, including primary and secondary magnesium, and
magnesium in ingot and granular form. As used below, the term ``firm''
includes any related firms.
(1) The name and address of your firm or entity (including World
Wide Web address) and name, telephone number, fax number, and Email
address of the certifying official.
(2) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is an
interested party under 19 U.S.C. 1677(9) and if so, how, including
whether your firm/entity is a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like
Product, a U.S. union or worker group, a U.S. importer of the Subject
Merchandise, a foreign producer or exporter of the Subject Merchandise,
a U.S. or foreign trade or business association (a majority of whose
members are interested parties under the statute), or another
interested party (including an explanation). If you are a union/worker
group or trade/business association, identify the firms in which your
workers are employed or which are members of your association.
(3) A statement indicating whether your firm/entity is willing to
participate in this proceeding by providing information requested by
the Commission.
(4) A statement of the likely effects of the revocation of the
antidumping duty order on the Domestic Industry in general and/or your
firm/entity specifically. In your response, please discuss the various
factors specified in section 752(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675a(a))
including the likely volume of subject imports, likely price effects of
subject imports, and likely impact of imports of Subject Merchandise on
the Domestic Industry.
(5) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. producers of
the Domestic Like Product. Identify any known related parties and the
nature of the relationship as defined in section 771(4)(B) of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 1677(4)(B)).
(6) A list of all known and currently operating U.S. importers of
the Subject Merchandise and producers of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country that currently export or have exported Subject
Merchandise to the United States or other countries after 2010.
(7) A list of 3-5 leading purchasers in the U.S. market for the
Domestic Like Product and the Subject Merchandise (including street
address, World Wide Web address, and the name, telephone number, fax
number, and Email address of a responsible official at each firm).
(8) A list of known sources of information on national or regional
prices for the Domestic Like Product or the Subject Merchandise in the
U.S. or other markets.
(9) If you are a U.S. producer of the Domestic Like Product,
provide the following information on your firm's operations on that
product during calendar year 2015, except as noted (report quantity
data in metric tons and value data in U.S. dollars, f.o.b. plant). If
you are a union/worker group or trade/business association, provide the
information, on an aggregate basis, for the firms in which your workers
are employed/which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. production of the Domestic Like Product
accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm to produce the Domestic Like
Product (i.e., the level of production that your establishment(s) could
reasonably have
[[Page 68049]]
expected to attain during the year, assuming normal operating
conditions (using equipment and machinery in place and ready to
operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time
for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or
representative product mix);
(c) the quantity and value of U.S. commercial shipments of the
Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
(d) the quantity and value of U.S. internal consumption/company
transfers of the Domestic Like Product produced in your U.S. plant(s);
and
(e) the value of (i) net sales, (ii) cost of goods sold (COGS),
(iii) gross profit, (iv) selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
expenses, and (v) operating income of the Domestic Like Product
produced in your U.S. plant(s) (include both U.S. and export commercial
sales, internal consumption, and company transfers) for your most
recently completed fiscal year (identify the date on which your fiscal
year ends).
(10) If you are a U.S. importer or a trade/business association of
U.S. importers of the Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country,
provide the following information on your firm's(s') operations on that
product during calendar year 2015 (report quantity data in metric tons
and value data in U.S. dollars). If you are a trade/business
association, provide the information, on an aggregate basis, for the
firms which are members of your association.
(a) The quantity and value (landed, duty-paid but not including
antidumping duties) of U.S. imports and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total U.S. imports of Subject Merchandise from the
Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') imports;
(b) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. commercial shipments of Subject Merchandise imported
from the Subject Country; and
(c) the quantity and value (f.o.b. U.S. port, including antidumping
duties) of U.S. internal consumption/company transfers of Subject
Merchandise imported from the Subject Country.
(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, or a trade/business
association of producers or exporters of the Subject Merchandise in the
Subject Country, provide the following information on your firm's(s')
operations on that product during calendar year 2015 (report quantity
data in metric tons and value data in U.S. dollars, landed and duty-
paid at the U.S. port but not including antidumping duties). If you are
a trade/business association, provide the information, on an aggregate
basis, for the firms which are members of your association.
(a) Production (quantity) and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total production of Subject Merchandise in the Subject
Country accounted for by your firm's(s') production;
(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) to produce the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country (i.e., the level of production that
your establishment(s) could reasonably have expected to attain during
the year, assuming normal operating conditions (using equipment and
machinery in place and ready to operate), normal operating levels
(hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance,
repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and
(c) the quantity and value of your firm's(s') exports to the United
States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the
percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise
from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm's(s') exports.
(12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand
conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have
occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject
Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2010, and significant changes,
if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time.
Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods;
development efforts; ability to increase production (including the
shift of production facilities used for other products and the use,
cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors
related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets
(including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in
market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses
and applications; the existence and availability of substitute
products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product
produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the
Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries.
(13) (OPTIONAL) A statement of whether you agree with the above
definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you
disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why
and provide alternative definitions.
Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 27, 2016.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2016-23717 Filed 9-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P