Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, 67293-67295 [2016-23666]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices
• Integrated Partnership and
Communications Working Group
Report
Dated: September 22, 2016.
John H. Thompson,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 2016–23670 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2013]
Reorganization and Expansion of
Foreign-Trade Zone 214 Under
Alternative Site Framework; Lenoir
County, North Carolina
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (15
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
zones;
Whereas, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation, grantee
of Foreign-Trade Zone 214, submitted
an application to the Board (FTZ Docket
B–20–2016, docketed April 13, 2016) for
authority to reorganize and expand
under the ASF with a service area of the
Counties of Pender, New Hanover,
Brunswick, Duplin, Columbus, Bladen,
Robeson, Beaufort, Pitt, Hyde, Onslow,
Jones, Craven, Pamlico, Lenoir, Carteret,
Wilson, Edgecombe, Nash, Wayne,
Greene and Cumberland, within and
adjacent to the Wilmington, Morehead
City and Raleigh-Durham Customs and
Border Protection ports of entry. FTZ
214’s existing Sites 1, 5, 6 (as modified)
and 7 would be categorized as magnet
sites and Sites 2, 3 and 4 would be
categorized as usage-driven sites, and
the grantee proposes three additional
magnet sites (Sites 8, 9 and 10);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (81 FR 23456–23457, April 21,
2016) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied
provided that inclusion of Robeson
County in the service area is limited to
the portion of the county east of
Interstate 95 (I–95);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize and
expand FTZ 214 under the ASF is
approved, with the service area
described above (i.e., inclusion of
Robeson County in the service area is
limited to the portion of the county east
of I–95), subject to the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations, including Section
400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000acre activation limit for the zone, to ASF
sunset provisions for magnet sites that
would terminate authority for Sites 1, 7,
8, 9 and 10 if not activated within five
years from the month of approval and
for Sites 5 and 6 if not activated within
the initial ten years from the month of
approval, and to an ASF sunset
provision for usage-driven sites that
would terminate authority for Sites 2, 3
and 4 if no foreign-status merchandise
is admitted for a bona fide customs
purpose within three years from the
month of approval.
Dated: September 15, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–23700 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No. 160713610–6783–02]
RIN 0625–XC020
Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final notice of implementation
of a cost recovery program fee.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
published the Cost Recovery Fee
Schedule for the EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework on July 22, 2016 (81
FR 47752). We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the fee
schedule. No comments were received
and so the fee schedule is considered
final until further review one year after
implementation of the program.
Consistent with the guidelines in OMB
Circular A–25,1 the U.S. Department of
Commerce’s International Trade
Administration (ITA) has implemented
a cost recovery program fee to support
the operation of the EU–U.S. Privacy
SUMMARY:
1 https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_
a025.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67293
Shield Framework (Privacy Shield),
which requires that U.S. organizations
pay an annual fee to ITA in order to
participate in the Privacy Shield. The
cost recovery program supports the
administration and supervision of the
Privacy Shield program and supports
the provision of Privacy Shield-related
services, including education and
outreach. The Privacy Shield fee
schedule was effective on August 1,
2016, when ITA began accepting selfcertifications under the Privacy Shield
Framework.
DATES: This fee schedule was effective
August 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
regarding the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework should be directed to Grace
Harter, Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration,
Room 20001, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC, tel. 202–482–
4936 or 202–482–1512 or via email at
privacyshield@trade.gov. Additional
information on ITA fees is available at
trade.gov/fees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Consistent with the guidelines in
OMB Circular A–25, federal agencies are
responsible for implementing cost
recovery program fees.
The role of ITA is to strengthen the
competitiveness of U.S. industry,
promote trade and investment, and
ensure fair trade through the rigorous
enforcement of our trade laws and
agreements. ITA works to promote
privacy policy frameworks to facilitate
the flow of data across borders to
support international trade.
The United States and the European
Union (EU) share the goal of enhancing
privacy protection but take different
approaches to protecting personal data.
Given those differences, the Department
of Commerce (DOC) developed the
Privacy Shield in consultation with the
European Commission, as well as with
industry and other stakeholders, to
provide organizations in the United
States with a reliable mechanism for
personal data transfers to the United
States from the European Union while
ensuring the protection of the data as
required by EU law.
In July 2016, the European
Commission approved the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework. The
published Privacy Shield Principles are
available at: [insert link]. The DOC has
issued the Privacy Shield Principles
under its statutory authority to foster,
promote, and develop international
commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512). ITA will
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
67294
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
administer and supervise the Privacy
Shield, including by maintaining and
making publicly available an
authoritative list of U.S. organizations
that have self-certified to the DOC. U.S.
organizations submit information to ITA
to self-certify their compliance with
Privacy Shield. ITA will accept selfcertification submissions beginning on
August 1, 2016. At a future date, ITA
will publish for public notice and
comment information collections as
described in the Privacy Shield
Framework consistent with the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
U.S. organizations considering selfcertifying to the Privacy Shield should
review the Privacy Shield Framework.
In summary, in order to enter the
Privacy Shield, an organization must (a)
be subject to the investigatory and
enforcement powers of the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) or the
Department of Transportation; (b)
publicly declare its commitment to
comply with the Principles through selfcertification to the DOC; (c) publicly
disclose its privacy policies in line with
the Principles; and (d) fully implement
them.
Self-certification to the DOC is
voluntary; however, an organization’s
failure to comply with the Principles
after its self-certification is enforceable
under Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act prohibiting unfair and
deceptive acts in or affecting commerce
(15 U.S.C. 45(a)) or other laws or
regulations prohibiting such acts.
ITA has implemented a cost recovery
program to support the operation of the
Privacy Shield, which requires U.S.
organizations to pay an annual fee to
ITA in order to participate in the
program. The cost recovery program
supports the administration and
supervision of the Privacy Shield
program and supports the provision of
Privacy Shield-related services,
including education and outreach. The
fee a given organization is charged is
based on the organization’s annual
revenue:
participating in the Privacy Shield. For
example, Privacy Shield organizations
must provide a readily available
independent recourse mechanism to
hear individual complaints at no cost to
the individual. Furthermore,
organizations are required to pay
contributions in connection with the
arbitral model, as described in Annex I
to the Principles.
Method for Determining Fees
ITA collects, retains, and expends
user fees pursuant to delegated
authority under the Mutual Educational
and Cultural Exchange Act as
authorized in its annual appropriations
acts.
The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework was developed to provide
organizations in the United States with
a reliable mechanism for personal data
transfers that underpin the trade and
investment relationship between the
United States and the EU.
Fees are set taking into account the
operational costs borne by ITA to
administer and supervise the Privacy
Shield program. The Privacy Shield
program requires a significant
commitment of resources and staff. The
Privacy Shield Framework includes
commitments from ITA to:
• Maintain a Privacy Shield Web site;
• verify self-certification requirements
submitted by organizations to
participate in the program;
• expand efforts to follow up with
organizations that have been removed
from the Privacy Shield List;
• search for and address false claims of
participation;
• conduct periodic compliance reviews
and assessments of the program;
• provide information regarding the
program to targeted audiences;
• increase cooperation with EU data
protection authorities;
• facilitate resolution of complaints
about non-compliance;
• hold annual meetings with the
European Commission and other
authorities to review the program, and
• provide an update of laws relevant to
Fee Schedule
Privacy Shield.
In setting the Privacy Shield fee
EU–U.S. PRIVACY SHIELD FRAMEschedule, ITA determined that the
WORK COST RECOVERY PROGRAM
services provided offer special benefits
Organization’s annual
to an identifiable recipient beyond those
Annual fee
revenue
that accrue to the general public. ITA
calculated the actual cost of providing
$0 to $5 million .........................
$250
its services in order to provide a basis
Over $5 million to $25 million ...
650
Over $25 million to $500 million
1,000 for setting each fee. Actual cost
Over $500 million to $5 billion ..
2,500 incorporates direct and indirect costs,
Over $5 billion ..........................
3,250 including operations and maintenance,
overhead, and charges for the use of
Organizations will have additional
capital facilities. ITA also took into
direct costs associated with
account additional factors, including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
adequacy of cost recovery, affordability,
and costs associated with alternative
options available to U.S. organizations
for the receipt of personal data from the
EU.
ITA established a 5-tiered fee
schedule that promotes the participation
of small organizations in Privacy Shield.
A multiple-tiered fee schedule allows
ITA to offer the organizations with
lower revenue a lower fee. In setting the
5 tiers, ITA considered, in conjunction
with the factors mentioned above: (1)
The Small Business Administration’s
guidance on identifying SMEs in
various industries most likely to
participate in the Privacy Shield, such
as computer services, software and
information services; (2) the likelihood
that small companies would be
expected to receive less personal data
and thereby use fewer government
resources; and (3) the likelihood that
companies with higher revenue would
have more customers whose data they
process, which would use more
government resources dedicated to
administering and overseeing Privacy
Shield. For example, if a company holds
more data it could reasonably produce
more questions and complaints from
consumers and the European Union’s
Data Protection Authorities (DPAs). ITA
has committed to facilitating the
resolution of individual complaints and
to communicating with the FTC and the
DPAs regarding consumer complaints.
Lastly, the fee increases between the
tiers are based in part on projected
program costs and estimated
participation levels among companies
within each tier.
Conclusion
Based on the information provided
above, ITA believes that its Privacy
Shield cost recovery fee schedule is
consistent with the objective of OMB
Circular A–25 to ‘‘promote efficient
allocation of the nation’s resources by
establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least
as great as the cost to the U.S.
Government of providing the special
benefits . . .’’ OMB Circular
A–25(5)(b). ITA did not receive any
public comments on the interim final
rule it published on July 22, 2016 (PUT
IN FR CITE) and is not revising the fee
schedule at this time. ITA will reassess
the fee schedule after the first year of
implementation and, in accordance with
OMB Circular A–25, at least every two
years thereafter.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices
Dated: September 20, 2016.
Edward M. Dean,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services,
International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2016–23666 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE891
Fishing Capacity Reduction Program
for the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of sub-loan repayment.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this notice to
inform interested parties that the
California Pink Shrimp sub-loan in the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Capacity
Reduction (Buyback) Program has been
repaid. Therefore, Buyback fee
collections on California Pink Shrimp
sub-loan will cease for all landings after
August 31, 2016.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before 5 p.m. EST October 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments about this
notice to Paul Marx, Chief, Financial
Services Division, NMFS, Attn:
California Pink Shrimp Buyback, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910 (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT).
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Michael A. Sturtevant at (301) 427–8799
or Michael.A.Sturtevant@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 16, 2004, NMFS published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(69 FR 67100) proposing to implement
an industry fee system for repaying the
California Pink Shrimp Buyback subloan. The final rule was published July
13, 2005 (70 FR 40225) and fee
collection began on September 8, 2005.
Interested persons should review these
for further program details.
The California Pink Shrimp Buyback
sub-loan in the amount of $674,202.18
will be repaid in full upon receipt of
buyback fees on landings through
August 31, 2016. NMFS has received
$1,182,214.57 to repay the principal and
interest on this sub-loan since fee
collection began September 8, 2005.
Based on Buyback fees received to date,
landings after August 31, 2016, will not
be subject to the Buyback fee. Therefore,
20:49 Sep 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: September 26, 2016.
Brian T. Pawlak,
CFO/Director, Office of Management and
Budget, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–23709 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing
System (IOOS®) Advisory Committee
National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of a
meeting of the U.S. Integrated Ocean
Observing System (IOOS®) Advisory
Committee (Committee) in Seattle, WA
and La Push, WA.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, October 11, 2016, from 9:00
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. in Seattle, WA. The
meeting will continue in La Push, WA
on Wednesday, October 12, 2016, from
9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m., and Thursday
October 13, 2016 from 9:00 a.m.–2:30
p.m. These times and the agenda topics
described below are subject to change.
Refer to the Web page listed below for
the most up-to-date meeting agenda.
ADDRESSES: On Tuesday, October 11 the
meeting will be held in the Hardisty
Conference Room, 6th floor, Henderson
Hall, University of Washington Applied
Physics Laboratory, 1013 NE 40th
Street, Seattle, WA 98105. On
Wednesday and Thursday, October 12–
13 the meeting will be held at the
Quileute Tribal Administration
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Buyback fees will no longer be collected
in the California Pink Shrimp fishery on
future landings.
Buyback fees not yet forwarded to
NMFS for California Pink Shrimp
landings through August 31, 2016,
should be forwarded to NMFS
immediately. Any overpayment of
Buyback fees submitted to NMFS will
be refunded on a pro-rata basis to the
fish buyers based upon best available
fish ticket landings data. The fish buyers
should return excess Buyback fees
collected to the harvesters, including
Buyback fees collected but not yet
remitted to NMFS for landings after
August 31, 2016. Any discrepancies in
fees owed and fees paid must be
resolved immediately. After the subloan is closed, no further adjustments to
fees paid and fees received can be made.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67295
Building, 90 Main Street, La Push, WA
98350.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Snowden, Designated Federal
Official, U.S. IOOS Advisory
Committee, U.S. IOOS Program, 1315
East-West Highway, Second Floor,
Silver Spring, MD 20910; Phone 240–
533–9466; Fax 301–713–3281; Email
jessica.snowden@noaa.gov or visit the
U.S. IOOS Advisory Committee Web
site at https://www.ioos.noaa.gov/
advisorycommittee.
The
Committee was established by the
NOAA Administrator as directed by
Section 12304 of the Integrated Coastal
and Ocean Observation System Act, part
of the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
11). The Committee advises the NOAA
Administrator and the Interagency
Ocean Observation Committee (IOOC)
on matters related to the responsibilities
and authorities set forth in section
12302 of the Integrated Coastal and
Ocean Observation System Act of 2009
and other appropriate matters as the
Under Secretary refers to the Committee
for review and advice.
The Committee will provide advice
on:
(a) Administration, operation,
management, and maintenance of the
System;
(b) expansion and periodic
modernization and upgrade of
technology components of the System;
(c) identification of end-user
communities, their needs for
information provided by the System,
and the System’s effectiveness in
dissemination information to end-user
communities and to the general public;
and
(d) any other purpose identified by
the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Oceans and Atmosphere or the
Interagency Ocean Observation
Committee.
The meeting will be open to public
participation with a 15-minute public
comment period on October 11, 2016,
from 11:45 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., on
October 12, 2016, from 4:30 p.m. to 4:45
p.m., and on October 13, 2016 from 2:00
p.m. to 2:15 p.m. (check agenda on Web
site to confirm time.) The Committee
expects that public statements presented
at its meetings will not be repetitive of
previously submitted verbal or written
statements. In general, each individual
or group making a verbal presentation
will be limited to a total time of three
(3) minutes. Written comments should
be received by the Designated Federal
Official by October 7, 2016 to provide
sufficient time for Committee review.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67293-67295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23666]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[Docket No. 160713610-6783-02]
RIN 0625-XC020
Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Final notice of implementation of a cost recovery program fee.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce published the Cost Recovery Fee
Schedule for the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework on July 22, 2016 (81
FR 47752). We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the
fee schedule. No comments were received and so the fee schedule is
considered final until further review one year after implementation of
the program. Consistent with the guidelines in OMB Circular A-25,\1\
the U.S. Department of Commerce's International Trade Administration
(ITA) has implemented a cost recovery program fee to support the
operation of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework (Privacy Shield),
which requires that U.S. organizations pay an annual fee to ITA in
order to participate in the Privacy Shield. The cost recovery program
supports the administration and supervision of the Privacy Shield
program and supports the provision of Privacy Shield-related services,
including education and outreach. The Privacy Shield fee schedule was
effective on August 1, 2016, when ITA began accepting self-
certifications under the Privacy Shield Framework.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: This fee schedule was effective August 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
regarding the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework should be directed to
Grace Harter, Department of Commerce, International Trade
Administration, Room 20001, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC, tel. 202-482-4936 or 202-482-1512 or via email at
privacyshield@trade.gov. Additional information on ITA fees is
available at trade.gov/fees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Consistent with the guidelines in OMB Circular A-25, federal
agencies are responsible for implementing cost recovery program fees.
The role of ITA is to strengthen the competitiveness of U.S.
industry, promote trade and investment, and ensure fair trade through
the rigorous enforcement of our trade laws and agreements. ITA works to
promote privacy policy frameworks to facilitate the flow of data across
borders to support international trade.
The United States and the European Union (EU) share the goal of
enhancing privacy protection but take different approaches to
protecting personal data. Given those differences, the Department of
Commerce (DOC) developed the Privacy Shield in consultation with the
European Commission, as well as with industry and other stakeholders,
to provide organizations in the United States with a reliable mechanism
for personal data transfers to the United States from the European
Union while ensuring the protection of the data as required by EU law.
In July 2016, the European Commission approved the EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework. The published Privacy Shield Principles are available
at: [insert link]. The DOC has issued the Privacy Shield Principles
under its statutory authority to foster, promote, and develop
international commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512). ITA will
[[Page 67294]]
administer and supervise the Privacy Shield, including by maintaining
and making publicly available an authoritative list of U.S.
organizations that have self-certified to the DOC. U.S. organizations
submit information to ITA to self-certify their compliance with Privacy
Shield. ITA will accept self-certification submissions beginning on
August 1, 2016. At a future date, ITA will publish for public notice
and comment information collections as described in the Privacy Shield
Framework consistent with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
U.S. organizations considering self-certifying to the Privacy
Shield should review the Privacy Shield Framework. In summary, in order
to enter the Privacy Shield, an organization must (a) be subject to the
investigatory and enforcement powers of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) or the Department of Transportation; (b) publicly declare its
commitment to comply with the Principles through self-certification to
the DOC; (c) publicly disclose its privacy policies in line with the
Principles; and (d) fully implement them.
Self-certification to the DOC is voluntary; however, an
organization's failure to comply with the Principles after its self-
certification is enforceable under Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act prohibiting unfair and deceptive acts in or affecting
commerce (15 U.S.C. 45(a)) or other laws or regulations prohibiting
such acts.
ITA has implemented a cost recovery program to support the
operation of the Privacy Shield, which requires U.S. organizations to
pay an annual fee to ITA in order to participate in the program. The
cost recovery program supports the administration and supervision of
the Privacy Shield program and supports the provision of Privacy
Shield-related services, including education and outreach. The fee a
given organization is charged is based on the organization's annual
revenue:
Fee Schedule
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Cost Recovery Program
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organization's annual revenue Annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$0 to $5 million........................................... $250
Over $5 million to $25 million............................. 650
Over $25 million to $500 million........................... 1,000
Over $500 million to $5 billion............................ 2,500
Over $5 billion............................................ 3,250
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Organizations will have additional direct costs associated with
participating in the Privacy Shield. For example, Privacy Shield
organizations must provide a readily available independent recourse
mechanism to hear individual complaints at no cost to the individual.
Furthermore, organizations are required to pay contributions in
connection with the arbitral model, as described in Annex I to the
Principles.
Method for Determining Fees
ITA collects, retains, and expends user fees pursuant to delegated
authority under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act as
authorized in its annual appropriations acts.
The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was developed to provide
organizations in the United States with a reliable mechanism for
personal data transfers that underpin the trade and investment
relationship between the United States and the EU.
Fees are set taking into account the operational costs borne by ITA
to administer and supervise the Privacy Shield program. The Privacy
Shield program requires a significant commitment of resources and
staff. The Privacy Shield Framework includes commitments from ITA to:
Maintain a Privacy Shield Web site;
verify self-certification requirements submitted by
organizations to participate in the program;
expand efforts to follow up with organizations that have been
removed from the Privacy Shield List;
search for and address false claims of participation;
conduct periodic compliance reviews and assessments of the
program;
provide information regarding the program to targeted
audiences;
increase cooperation with EU data protection authorities;
facilitate resolution of complaints about non-compliance;
hold annual meetings with the European Commission and other
authorities to review the program, and
provide an update of laws relevant to Privacy Shield.
In setting the Privacy Shield fee schedule, ITA determined that the
services provided offer special benefits to an identifiable recipient
beyond those that accrue to the general public. ITA calculated the
actual cost of providing its services in order to provide a basis for
setting each fee. Actual cost incorporates direct and indirect costs,
including operations and maintenance, overhead, and charges for the use
of capital facilities. ITA also took into account additional factors,
including adequacy of cost recovery, affordability, and costs
associated with alternative options available to U.S. organizations for
the receipt of personal data from the EU.
ITA established a 5-tiered fee schedule that promotes the
participation of small organizations in Privacy Shield. A multiple-
tiered fee schedule allows ITA to offer the organizations with lower
revenue a lower fee. In setting the 5 tiers, ITA considered, in
conjunction with the factors mentioned above: (1) The Small Business
Administration's guidance on identifying SMEs in various industries
most likely to participate in the Privacy Shield, such as computer
services, software and information services; (2) the likelihood that
small companies would be expected to receive less personal data and
thereby use fewer government resources; and (3) the likelihood that
companies with higher revenue would have more customers whose data they
process, which would use more government resources dedicated to
administering and overseeing Privacy Shield. For example, if a company
holds more data it could reasonably produce more questions and
complaints from consumers and the European Union's Data Protection
Authorities (DPAs). ITA has committed to facilitating the resolution of
individual complaints and to communicating with the FTC and the DPAs
regarding consumer complaints. Lastly, the fee increases between the
tiers are based in part on projected program costs and estimated
participation levels among companies within each tier.
Conclusion
Based on the information provided above, ITA believes that its
Privacy Shield cost recovery fee schedule is consistent with the
objective of OMB Circular A-25 to ``promote efficient allocation of the
nation's resources by establishing charges for special benefits
provided to the recipient that are at least as great as the cost to the
U.S. Government of providing the special benefits . . .'' OMB Circular
A-25(5)(b). ITA did not receive any public comments on the interim
final rule it published on July 22, 2016 (PUT IN FR CITE) and is not
revising the fee schedule at this time. ITA will reassess the fee
schedule after the first year of implementation and, in accordance with
OMB Circular A-25, at least every two years thereafter.
[[Page 67295]]
Dated: September 20, 2016.
Edward M. Dean,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2016-23666 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P