Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory Safety Standards, 67396-67397 [2016-23626]
Download as PDF
67396
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices
River, Wyoming 82935, MSHA I.D. No.
48–01295, located in Sweetwater
County, Wyoming.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
57.22606(a) and (c) (Explosive materials
and blasting units (III mines).
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2016–23625 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of
Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Section 101(c) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and
Title 30 of the Code of Federal
Regulations Part 44 govern the
application, processing, and disposition
of petitions for modification. This notice
is a summary of petitions for
modification submitted to the Mine
Safety and Health Administration
(MSHA) by the parties listed below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions
must be received by MSHA’s Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances
on or before October 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by ‘‘docket
number’’ on the subject line, by any of
the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject
line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202–693–9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery:
MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452, Attention: Sheila
McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
Persons delivering documents are
required to check in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. Individuals may
inspect copies of the petitions and
comments during normal business
hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments
postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or
proof of delivery from another delivery
service such as UPS or Federal Express
on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Regulations, and Variances at 202–693–
9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov
(Email), or 202–693–9441 (Facsimile).
[These are not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine
Act) allows the mine operator or
representative of miners to file a
petition to modify the application of any
mandatory safety standard to a coal or
other mine if the Secretary of Labor
determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving
the result of such standard exists which
will at all times guarantee no less than
the same measure of protection afforded
the miners of such mine by such
standard; or
2. That the application of such
standard to such mine will result in a
diminution of safety to the miners in
such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR
44.10 and 44.11 establish the
requirements and procedures for filing
petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M–2016–027–C.
Petitioner: Oak Gove Resources, LLC,
8360 Taylors Ferry Road, Hueytown,
Alabama 35023.
Mine: Oak Grove Mine, MSHA I.D.
No. 01–00851, located in Jefferson
County, Alabama.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR
75.364(b)(2) (Weekly examination).
Modification Request: The petitioner
requests a modification of the existing
standard to permit an alternative
method of compliance for weekly
examinations of the four-part overcast
bank located in the Main North entries
at spad number 16+20, due to
deteriorating roof and rib conditions
that have made traveling the area unsafe
and conditions in the area are
impractical and unsafe to rehabilitate.
The petitioner proposes to have a
certified person take air quantity and
quality measurements at monitoring
points 71A and 71C at entrance and
exist of overcast bank will afford the
mines the same protection as the
existing standard. The petitioner asserts
that the existing standard 30 CFR
75.364(b)(2) undermines the safety of
the miners by placing them in an area
with deteriorated roof and rib
conditions. The petitioner states that the
following terms and conditions will be
followed:
(1) Monitoring stations 71A and 71C
will allow effective evaluation of airflow
across overcast used to ventilate old
works.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(a) Monitoring station 71A will
evaluate air entering overcast bank.
(b) Monitoring station 71C will
evaluate air as it leaves overcast bank.
(2) Signs showing safe travel route to
each monitoring station will be posed in
adjacent entries. Monitoring stations
and routes will be kept free of water
accumulations.
(3) A certified person will conduct
weekly evaluations at each of the
monitoring stations. Evaluations will
include quantity and quality of air
entering or exiting overcast bank.
Measurements will be made using
MSHA-approved and calibrated handheld multi gas detectors to check for
methane, and oxygen concentrations.
Appropriate calibrated anemometers
will be used to check airflow and
volume.
(4) A diagram of normal air flow will
be posted at 71A and 71C monitoring
points and maintained legible. Any
changes will be reported to the Mine
Foreman for immediate investigation.
(5) At each monitoring station, a date
board will be provided where date,
time, and examiner’s initials will be
recorded along with measured quantity
and quality of air. Results including
conditions of accessible controls will be
recorded in a book kept on the surface
and made available to all interested
parties.
(6) All monitoring stations and
approaches will at all times be
maintained in a safe condition. The roof
will be supported by bolts and other
means to prevent deterioration in the
area of monitoring points.
(7) Monitoring stations locations will
be shown on an annually submitted
mine ventilation map. Monitoring
stations will not be moved to another
location without prior approval by the
District Manager as part of the
ventilation plan for the mine.
(8) For added safety additional roof
support will be added under overcasts
that belt and track travel through.
(9) Prior to implementation of this
modification, all mine personnel will be
instructed that except along designated
routes no travel into the petitioned area
will be permitted and all approaches
will be fenced or barricaded with ‘‘DO
NOT ENTER’’ warning signs.
(10) The overcast area is not being
used for work or travel, and, upon
information and belief, no one has
performed work, examinations,
inspections, or otherwise traveled in the
overcast area in many years.
(11) Within 60 days after the Proposed
Decision and Order (PDO) becomes
final, the petitioner will submit
proposed revisions for the approved
part 48 training plan to the District
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices
Manager. The revisions will include
initial and refresher training regarding
compliance with the PDO.
(12) Use of the proposed alternative
method described in this petition will
prevent miners from being exposed to
unnecessary hazards, and will increase
the measure of protection to the miners.
The petitioner asserts that application
of the existing standard to the particular
overcast area will result in a diminution
of safety to the miners and that the
proposed alternative method will at all
times guarantee no less than the same
measure of protection to the miners as
would be provided by the existing
standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations,
and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2016–23626 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0008]
Construction Fall Protection Systems
Criteria and Practices, and Training
Requirements; Extension of the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the
information collection requirements
contained in the Construction Standards
on Fall Protection Systems Criteria and
Practices (29 CFR 1926.502), and
Training Requirements (29 CFR
1926.503).
SUMMARY:
Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by
November 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Sep 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2010–0008, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail,
messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Department of
Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal
business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and the OSHA
docket number (Docket No. OSHA–
2010–0008) for this Information
Collection Request (ICR). All comments,
including any personal information you
provide, are placed in the public docket
without change, and may be made
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov. For further
information on submitting comments,
see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading
in the section of this notice titled
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the
address above. All documents in the
docket (including this Federal Register
notice) are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download from the Web site. All
submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
You may also contact Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; (202) 693–2044,
to obtain a copy of the ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Construction Services,
Directorate of Construction, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–3476,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202)
693–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accord with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program
ensures that information is in the
desired format, reporting burden (time
and costs) is minimal, collection
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
67397
instruments are understandable, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is correct. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the OSH Act) authorizes
information collection by employers as
necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the OSH Act, or for
developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657).
The Standards on Construction Fall
Protection Systems Criteria and
Practices (29 CFR 1926.502) and
Training Requirements (29 CFR
1926.503) ensure that employers
provide the required fall protection for
their workers. Accordingly, these
standards have the following paperwork
requirements: Paragraphs (c)(4)(ii) and
(k) of 29 CFR 1926.502, which specify
certification of safety nets and
development of fall protection plans,
respectively, and paragraph (b) of 29
CFR 1926.503, which requires
employers to certify training records.
The training certification requirement
specified in paragraph (b) of 29 CFR
1926.503 documents the training
provided to workers potentially exposed
to fall hazards in construction. A
competent person must train these
workers to recognize fall hazards and in
the use of procedures and equipment
that minimize these hazards. An
employer must verify compliance with
this training requirement by preparing
and maintaining a written certification
record that contains the name or other
identifier of the worker receiving the
training, the date(s) of the training, and
the signature of the competent person
who conducted the training, or of the
employer.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67396-67397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23626]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
Petitions for Modification of Application of Existing Mandatory
Safety Standards
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of
1977 and Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 44 govern the
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for modification.
This notice is a summary of petitions for modification submitted to the
Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) by the parties listed
below.
DATES: All comments on the petitions must be received by MSHA's Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances on or before October 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by ``docket
number'' on the subject line, by any of the following methods:
1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHA-comments@dol.gov. Include the docket
number of the petition in the subject line of the message.
2. Facsimile: 202-693-9441.
3. Regular Mail or Hand Delivery: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401,
Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452, Attention: Sheila McConnell, Director,
Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances. Persons delivering
documents are required to check in at the receptionist's desk in Suite
4E401. Individuals may inspect copies of the petitions and comments
during normal business hours at the address listed above.
MSHA will consider only comments postmarked by the U.S. Postal
Service or proof of delivery from another delivery service such as UPS
or Federal Express on or before the deadline for comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Barron, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9447 (Voice),
barron.barbara@dol.gov (Email), or 202-693-9441 (Facsimile). [These are
not toll-free numbers.]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 101(c) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
(Mine Act) allows the mine operator or representative of miners to file
a petition to modify the application of any mandatory safety standard
to a coal or other mine if the Secretary of Labor determines that:
1. An alternative method of achieving the result of such standard
exists which will at all times guarantee no less than the same measure
of protection afforded the miners of such mine by such standard; or
2. That the application of such standard to such mine will result
in a diminution of safety to the miners in such mine.
In addition, the regulations at 30 CFR 44.10 and 44.11 establish
the requirements and procedures for filing petitions for modification.
II. Petitions for Modification
Docket Number: M-2016-027-C.
Petitioner: Oak Gove Resources, LLC, 8360 Taylors Ferry Road,
Hueytown, Alabama 35023.
Mine: Oak Grove Mine, MSHA I.D. No. 01-00851, located in Jefferson
County, Alabama.
Regulation Affected: 30 CFR 75.364(b)(2) (Weekly examination).
Modification Request: The petitioner requests a modification of the
existing standard to permit an alternative method of compliance for
weekly examinations of the four-part overcast bank located in the Main
North entries at spad number 16+20, due to deteriorating roof and rib
conditions that have made traveling the area unsafe and conditions in
the area are impractical and unsafe to rehabilitate. The petitioner
proposes to have a certified person take air quantity and quality
measurements at monitoring points 71A and 71C at entrance and exist of
overcast bank will afford the mines the same protection as the existing
standard. The petitioner asserts that the existing standard 30 CFR
75.364(b)(2) undermines the safety of the miners by placing them in an
area with deteriorated roof and rib conditions. The petitioner states
that the following terms and conditions will be followed:
(1) Monitoring stations 71A and 71C will allow effective evaluation
of airflow across overcast used to ventilate old works.
(a) Monitoring station 71A will evaluate air entering overcast
bank.
(b) Monitoring station 71C will evaluate air as it leaves overcast
bank.
(2) Signs showing safe travel route to each monitoring station will
be posed in adjacent entries. Monitoring stations and routes will be
kept free of water accumulations.
(3) A certified person will conduct weekly evaluations at each of
the monitoring stations. Evaluations will include quantity and quality
of air entering or exiting overcast bank. Measurements will be made
using MSHA-approved and calibrated hand-held multi gas detectors to
check for methane, and oxygen concentrations. Appropriate calibrated
anemometers will be used to check airflow and volume.
(4) A diagram of normal air flow will be posted at 71A and 71C
monitoring points and maintained legible. Any changes will be reported
to the Mine Foreman for immediate investigation.
(5) At each monitoring station, a date board will be provided where
date, time, and examiner's initials will be recorded along with
measured quantity and quality of air. Results including conditions of
accessible controls will be recorded in a book kept on the surface and
made available to all interested parties.
(6) All monitoring stations and approaches will at all times be
maintained in a safe condition. The roof will be supported by bolts and
other means to prevent deterioration in the area of monitoring points.
(7) Monitoring stations locations will be shown on an annually
submitted mine ventilation map. Monitoring stations will not be moved
to another location without prior approval by the District Manager as
part of the ventilation plan for the mine.
(8) For added safety additional roof support will be added under
overcasts that belt and track travel through.
(9) Prior to implementation of this modification, all mine
personnel will be instructed that except along designated routes no
travel into the petitioned area will be permitted and all approaches
will be fenced or barricaded with ``DO NOT ENTER'' warning signs.
(10) The overcast area is not being used for work or travel, and,
upon information and belief, no one has performed work, examinations,
inspections, or otherwise traveled in the overcast area in many years.
(11) Within 60 days after the Proposed Decision and Order (PDO)
becomes final, the petitioner will submit proposed revisions for the
approved part 48 training plan to the District
[[Page 67397]]
Manager. The revisions will include initial and refresher training
regarding compliance with the PDO.
(12) Use of the proposed alternative method described in this
petition will prevent miners from being exposed to unnecessary hazards,
and will increase the measure of protection to the miners.
The petitioner asserts that application of the existing standard to
the particular overcast area will result in a diminution of safety to
the miners and that the proposed alternative method will at all times
guarantee no less than the same measure of protection to the miners as
would be provided by the existing standard.
Sheila McConnell,
Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.
[FR Doc. 2016-23626 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-23-P