Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1 and Partial Amendment No. 2, Amending Exchange Rule 49 Regarding the Exchange's: (1) Emergency Powers; (2) Disaster Recovery Plans; and (3) Backup Systems and Mandatory Testing, 67029-67031 [2016-23494]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Notices
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiver of the
30-day operative delay is appropriate
because the Tenth NYSE Operating
Agreement will become ‘‘rules of an
exchange’’ of NYSE MKT without
delay.16 Based on the foregoing, the
Commission believes that the waiver of
the operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest.17 The Commission
hereby grants the waiver and designates
the proposal operative upon filing.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–89 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–89. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
16 See
15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(27).
17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:51 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2016–89 and should be
submitted on or before October 20,
2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
67029
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend Exchange Rule 49 to
establish a Disaster Recovery Facility
and to move the text of Exchange Rule
438 to proposed Exchange Rule 49. On
August 1, 2016, the Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to its proposal.3 On
August 11, 2016, the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No.
1, was published for comment in the
Federal Register.4 On September 19,
2016, the Exchange filed Partial
Amendment No. 2, to its proposal.5
The Commission did not receive any
comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposal, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 and Partial
Amendment No. 2.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Changes, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 and Partial Amendment No. 2
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 49 by removing the
current text relating to the Exchange’s
Emergency Powers and replacing it with
new text regarding the Exchange’s
Business Continuity and Disaster
Recovery Plan, and by moving the text
in Exchange Rule 438 regarding
Mandatory Testing to Rule 49.6 The
Exchange also proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 51 to govern the
circumstances under which the
Exchange’s CEO may determine to have
the Exchange trade securities on its
Disaster Recovery Facility.
[FR Doc. 2016–23491 Filed 9–28–16; 8:45 am]
1 15
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Amendment No. 1 replaced the proposal in its
entirety.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78484
(Aug. 5, 2016), 81 FR 53180 (SR–NYSE–2016–48)
(‘‘Notice’’).
5 Amendment No. 2 partially amended the
proposal to add additional text to proposed
Exchange Rule 49, specifying that member
organizations of the Exchange that are currently
required to participate in testing of the Exchange’s
business continuity and disaster recovery plans
under current Exchange Rule 438 and proposed
Exchange Rule 49(b)(N) would also be required to
test the Exchange’s proposed disaster recovery
plans. Partial Amendment No. 2 is available at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-48/
nyse201648-2.pdf. Because Amendment No. 2 does
not materially alter the substance of the proposed
rule change or raise unique or novel regulatory
issues, Amendment No. 2 is not subject to notice
and comment.
6 Because the Exchange would not implement
amended Exchange Rule 49(a) until after an
opportunity to test its procedures with Exchange
member organizations, the Exchange proposes to
retain current NYSE Rule 49 on its rulebook. The
Exchange would delete current Exchange Rule 49
through a separate proposed rule change to
establish the operative date of amended Exchange
Rule 49(a). In addition to filing the separate
proposed rule change, the Exchange will announce
via Trader Update the operative date of proposed
Rule 49(a).
2 17
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78916; File No. SR–NYSE–
2016–48]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 and Partial Amendment No. 2,
Amending Exchange Rule 49
Regarding the Exchange’s: (1)
Emergency Powers; (2) Disaster
Recovery Plans; and (3) Backup
Systems and Mandatory Testing
September 23, 2016.
I. Introduction
On July 29, 2016, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
19 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
67030
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Notices
A. Current NYSE Rule 49
Exchange Rule 49(a) sets forth the
Exchange’s emergency powers, which
grant a qualified Exchange officer the
authority to declare an emergency
condition with respect to trading on or
through the Exchange’s systems and
facilities of the Exchange, and
designates NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’) to perform certain functions on
behalf of, and at the direction of, the
Exchange in the event of an emergency
condition. Exchange Rule 49(a) also
describes when an Emergency
Condition may be declared and defines
the terms ‘‘emergency’’ and ‘‘qualified
Exchange officer.’’
Under Exchange Rule 49, once an
emergency condition is declared, the
Exchange shall halt all trading on its
systems and facilities, purge any
unexecuted orders as soon as
practicable, and prevent those orders
from routing to NYSE Arca.7 Beginning
the next trading day following the
declaration of an emergency condition,
NYSE Arca, on behalf of and at the
direction of the Exchange, shall
disseminate the official opening, reopening, and closing trades of
Exchange-listed securities to the
Consolidated Tape as messages of the
Exchange, and also disseminate certain
other notifications for Exchange-listed
securities to the Consolidated Quotation
System as messages of the Exchange.8 In
addition, bids and offers for Exchangelisted securities entered on or through
the systems and facilities of NYSE Arca
during the emergency condition shall be
reported to the Consolidated Quotation
System as bids and offers of NYSE Arca,
except that the opening quote shall be
reported to the Consolidated Quotation
System as a bid or offer of both the
Exchange and NYSE Arca, and any reopening quote shall be reported to the
Consolidated Quotation System as a bid
or offer of the Exchange only.9
Members and member organizations
of the Exchange who wish to trade
Exchange-listed securities during an
emergency condition are responsible for
having a contingency plan for
connecting to NYSE Arca.10 All trading
of Exchange-listed securities during an
emergency condition on or through
NYSE Arca shall be subject to NYSE
Arca Equities Rules.11 Before declaring
an emergency condition, the qualified
Exchange officer shall make a
7 See
Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(1)(A) and (B).
Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(2)(A).
9 See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(2)(B).
10 See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(3).
11 See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(4). However,
the Exchange’s listing requirements shall remain
applicable. See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(4).
8 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:51 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
reasonable effort to consult with the
Commission.12 An emergency condition
may remain in effect for up to 10
calendar days from the date it is
invoked.13 The Exchange has
represented that, to date, it has not
invoked Exchange Rule 49.14
B. Proposed Amendments to Exchange
Rules
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
business continuity and disaster
recovery plans for use on the Disaster
Recovery Facility to be maintained by
the Exchange. Under the proposed
business continuity and disaster
recovery plans, if the Exchange trades
securities on its Disaster Recovery
Facility, then:
1. The 11 Wall Street facilities will
not be available for trading.15
2. Consistent with the Exchange’s
business continuity plan, opening and
reopening auctions of Exchange-traded
securities traded on the Disaster
Recovery Facility would be subject to
Rule 123D(a)(2)–(6) and closing auctions
would be subject to Supplementary
Material .10 to Rule 123C.16
3. Any unexecuted Exchange-traded
securities orders entered into the
Exchange’s systems prior to
commencing trading on the Disaster
Recovery Facility would be deemed
canceled and would be purged from the
Exchange’s systems.17
4. Member organizations registered as
DMMs would not be subject to any
DMM obligations or benefits under
Exchange rules while securities trade on
the Disaster Recovery Facility.18
12 See
Current Exchange Rule 49(c)(1).
Current Exchange Rule 49(c)(2).
14 See Notice, supra note 3, at 53182.
15 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(A). The
Exchange states that, because the trading systems in
the Exchange’s Disaster Recovery Facility would
not have connectivity to designated market maker
(‘‘DMM’’) and Floor broker trading systems, the
Exchange would operate as a fully electronic
exchange when operating out of its Disaster
Recovery Facility, even if 11 Wall Street facilities
were not impacted.
16 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(B). The
Exchange states that, because there would be no
Trading Floor or DMM connectivity, the Exchange
would facilitate all openings, reopenings, and
closings.
17 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(C). The
Exchange states that the orders would have to be
canceled because, depending on the scope of the
disruption, the Exchange may be unable to transmit
cancellation messages for unexecuted orders.
18 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(D). See
also Exchange Rule 103B(I) (quoting requirements
for allocation process of listed securities) and Rule
104 (Dealings and Responsibilities of DMMs).
According to the Exchange, DMMs would not be
subject to any such obligations or benefits because
the Exchange would not maintain systems that
support DMM quoting at its Disaster Recovery
Facility. Therefore, DMMs that route orders to the
Disaster Recovery Facility would trade in a manner
13 See
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Disaster Recovery Facility and
the revised business continuity and
disaster recovery plans would allow the
Exchange to no longer designate NYSE
Arca as its backup facility but instead
operate as a fully electronic exchange on
its own facilities under its own trading
rules, with its own order book and with
quotes and trades publicly reported as
quotes and trades of the Exchange,
rather than as quotes and trades of
NYSE Arca. Member organizations
wishing to trade on the Exchange’s
Disaster Recovery Facility would be
responsible for having contingency
plans for establishing connectivity to
that facility and changing routing
instructions for their order entry
systems to send bids and offers in
Exchange-traded securities to that
facility.19 The proposed rule change
would also require member
organizations to participate in
scheduled functional and performance
testing of the Exchange’s business
continuity and disaster recovery plans
in the manner and frequency specified
by the Exchange, which shall not be less
than once every 12 months.20
The Exchange also proposes to delete
certain current Rule 49 text that will be
rendered obsolete or unnecessary by the
proposal. This text includes certain
terms, references to NYSE Arca, limits
on the operative period for emergency
powers, and notifications to the
Commission.21 In addition the Exchange
has proposed non-substantive
conforming changes to Exchange Rules
49(b)(N), 431, and 438, to update
numbering and cross-references.22
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
amend Exchange Rule 51 to govern the
circumstances under which the
Exchange’s Chief Executive Officer
(‘‘CEO’’) may determine to have the
Exchange trade securities on its Disaster
Recovery Facility.23
similar to other market participants that
electronically enter orders at the Exchange, and
DMMs would be subject to the same fees and
credits applicable to non-DMM transactions.
19 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(3).
20 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N).
21 The Commission notes that, under Regulation
SCI, the Exchange would be required to notify the
Commission of any ‘‘SCI event,’’ such as a systems
disruption that caused the Exchange to use its
Disaster Recovery Facility. See 17 CFR
242.1002(b)(1).
22 The Exchange proposes to designate this
paragraph of proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N) with
an ‘‘N’’ to distinguish it from current Exchange Rule
49(b), as both would be operative at the same time.
23 The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange
Rule 51(b) to provide the Exchange’s CEO with the
authority to determine whether to use the
Exchange’s Disaster Recovery Facility. The
Exchange also proposes to make a conforming
amendment to Exchange Rule 51(c) to specify that
the CEO shall take any of the actions described in
Exchange Rule 51(b) only when such action is
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
67031
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 189 / Thursday, September 29, 2016 / Notices
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review of the proposal,
as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and
No. 2, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
exchange.24 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,25 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Under amended Exchange Rule 49,
the Exchange would maintain its own
Disaster Recovery Facility to continue
Exchange operations when necessary
without substantial disruption to
member organizations. This Disaster
Recovery Facility would allow the
Exchange to no longer designate NYSE
Arca as its backup facility but instead
operate as a fully electronic exchange on
its own facilities, under its own trading
rules, with its own order book and with
quotes and trades publicly reported
under the Exchange’s own reporting
symbol. The proposed rule change
would also require member
organizations to participate in
scheduled functional and performance
testing of the Exchange’s business
continuity and disaster recovery plans
in the manner and frequency specified
by the Exchange, which shall not be less
than once every 12 months.26
Under the proposal, the Exchange
CEO would be authorized to make a
determination for the Exchange to trade
securities on the Disaster Recovery
Facility only when the CEO deems such
action to be necessary or appropriate for
the maintenance of a fair and orderly
market, or for the protection of investors
or otherwise in the public interest, due
to extraordinary circumstances. The
Exchange CEO must notify the Exchange
board of directors as soon as feasible if
deemed necessary or appropriate for the
maintenance of a fair and orderly market, or the
protection of investors of otherwise in the public
interest, due to extraordinary circumstances.
24 In approving these proposed rule changes, the
Commission has considered the proposed rules’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:51 Sep 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
the CEO makes a determination to use
the Disaster Recovery Facility.
The Commission believes that the
proposal is reasonably designed to
permit the Exchange to continue to
operate in the event of an emergency by
using a secondary data center located in
a geographically diverse location to
open, trade, and close Exchange-listed
securities. Accordingly, the Commission
believes that the proposal is designed to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and to
protect investors and the public interest,
and the Commission therefore finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,27 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2016–
48), as modified by Amendments No. 1
and Partial Amendment No. 2, be, and
hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–23494 Filed 9–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78915; File No. SR–CBOE–
2016–067]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Correct Rule 3.6A
September 23, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 9, 2016, Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
25 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
26 See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N).
27 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange seeks to correct a
typographical error in Rule 3.6A.08
related to the Qualification and
Registration of Trading Permit Holders
and Associated Persons. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided
below.
(additions are underlined; deletions
are [bracketed])
*
*
*
*
*
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated Rules
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 3.6A. Qualification and Registration
of Trading Permit Holders and Associated
Persons
(a)–(e) No change.
. . . Interpretations and Policies:
.01–.07 No change.
.08 (a) An individual Trading Permit
Holder or individual associated person who:
(1) is engaged in proprietary trading,
market-making and/or effecting transactions
on behalf of a broker-dealer is required to
register and qualify as a Securities Trader
(TD) in WebCRD;
(2) (i) supervises or monitors proprietary
trading, market-making and/or brokerage
activities for broker-dealers; (ii) supervises or
trains those engaged in proprietary trading,
market-making and/or effecting transactions
on behalf of a broker-dealer, with respect to
those activities; and/or (iii) is an officer,
partner or director of a Trading Permit
Holder or TPH organization is required to
register and qualify as a Securities Trader
Principal (TP) in WebCRD and satisfy the
prerequisite registration and qualification
requirements; and
(3) is a Chief Compliance Officer (or
performs similar functions) for a Trading
Permit Holder or TPH organization that
engages in proprietary trading, marketmaking or effecting transactions on behalf of
a broker-dealer is required to register and
qualify as a Securities Trader Compliance
Officer (CT) in WebCRD and satisfy the
prerequisite registration and qualification
requirements.
(b) The following sets forth the
qualification requirements for each of the
required registration categories described in
paragraph (a) to Interpretation and Policy .08:
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM
29SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 189 (Thursday, September 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67029-67031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23494]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78916; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-48]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No.
1 and Partial Amendment No. 2, Amending Exchange Rule 49 Regarding the
Exchange's: (1) Emergency Powers; (2) Disaster Recovery Plans; and (3)
Backup Systems and Mandatory Testing
September 23, 2016.
I. Introduction
On July 29, 2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 49 to establish a Disaster
Recovery Facility and to move the text of Exchange Rule 438 to proposed
Exchange Rule 49. On August 1, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1
to its proposal.\3\ On August 11, 2016, the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal
Register.\4\ On September 19, 2016, the Exchange filed Partial
Amendment No. 2, to its proposal.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Amendment No. 1 replaced the proposal in its entirety.
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78484 (Aug. 5,
2016), 81 FR 53180 (SR-NYSE-2016-48) (``Notice'').
\5\ Amendment No. 2 partially amended the proposal to add
additional text to proposed Exchange Rule 49, specifying that member
organizations of the Exchange that are currently required to
participate in testing of the Exchange's business continuity and
disaster recovery plans under current Exchange Rule 438 and proposed
Exchange Rule 49(b)(N) would also be required to test the Exchange's
proposed disaster recovery plans. Partial Amendment No. 2 is
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-48/nyse201648-2.pdf. Because Amendment No. 2 does not materially alter
the substance of the proposed rule change or raise unique or novel
regulatory issues, Amendment No. 2 is not subject to notice and
comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposal, as modified by Amendment No. 1 and Partial
Amendment No. 2.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 and Partial Amendment No. 2
The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 49 by removing the
current text relating to the Exchange's Emergency Powers and replacing
it with new text regarding the Exchange's Business Continuity and
Disaster Recovery Plan, and by moving the text in Exchange Rule 438
regarding Mandatory Testing to Rule 49.\6\ The Exchange also proposes
to amend Exchange Rule 51 to govern the circumstances under which the
Exchange's CEO may determine to have the Exchange trade securities on
its Disaster Recovery Facility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Because the Exchange would not implement amended Exchange
Rule 49(a) until after an opportunity to test its procedures with
Exchange member organizations, the Exchange proposes to retain
current NYSE Rule 49 on its rulebook. The Exchange would delete
current Exchange Rule 49 through a separate proposed rule change to
establish the operative date of amended Exchange Rule 49(a). In
addition to filing the separate proposed rule change, the Exchange
will announce via Trader Update the operative date of proposed Rule
49(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 67030]]
A. Current NYSE Rule 49
Exchange Rule 49(a) sets forth the Exchange's emergency powers,
which grant a qualified Exchange officer the authority to declare an
emergency condition with respect to trading on or through the
Exchange's systems and facilities of the Exchange, and designates NYSE
Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') to perform certain functions on behalf of,
and at the direction of, the Exchange in the event of an emergency
condition. Exchange Rule 49(a) also describes when an Emergency
Condition may be declared and defines the terms ``emergency'' and
``qualified Exchange officer.''
Under Exchange Rule 49, once an emergency condition is declared,
the Exchange shall halt all trading on its systems and facilities,
purge any unexecuted orders as soon as practicable, and prevent those
orders from routing to NYSE Arca.\7\ Beginning the next trading day
following the declaration of an emergency condition, NYSE Arca, on
behalf of and at the direction of the Exchange, shall disseminate the
official opening, re-opening, and closing trades of Exchange-listed
securities to the Consolidated Tape as messages of the Exchange, and
also disseminate certain other notifications for Exchange-listed
securities to the Consolidated Quotation System as messages of the
Exchange.\8\ In addition, bids and offers for Exchange-listed
securities entered on or through the systems and facilities of NYSE
Arca during the emergency condition shall be reported to the
Consolidated Quotation System as bids and offers of NYSE Arca, except
that the opening quote shall be reported to the Consolidated Quotation
System as a bid or offer of both the Exchange and NYSE Arca, and any
re-opening quote shall be reported to the Consolidated Quotation System
as a bid or offer of the Exchange only.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(1)(A) and (B).
\8\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(2)(A).
\9\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Members and member organizations of the Exchange who wish to trade
Exchange-listed securities during an emergency condition are
responsible for having a contingency plan for connecting to NYSE
Arca.\10\ All trading of Exchange-listed securities during an emergency
condition on or through NYSE Arca shall be subject to NYSE Arca
Equities Rules.\11\ Before declaring an emergency condition, the
qualified Exchange officer shall make a reasonable effort to consult
with the Commission.\12\ An emergency condition may remain in effect
for up to 10 calendar days from the date it is invoked.\13\ The
Exchange has represented that, to date, it has not invoked Exchange
Rule 49.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(3).
\11\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(b)(4). However, the Exchange's
listing requirements shall remain applicable. See Current Exchange
Rule 49(b)(4).
\12\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(c)(1).
\13\ See Current Exchange Rule 49(c)(2).
\14\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 53182.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Proposed Amendments to Exchange Rules
The Exchange proposes to adopt new business continuity and disaster
recovery plans for use on the Disaster Recovery Facility to be
maintained by the Exchange. Under the proposed business continuity and
disaster recovery plans, if the Exchange trades securities on its
Disaster Recovery Facility, then:
1. The 11 Wall Street facilities will not be available for
trading.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(A). The Exchange states
that, because the trading systems in the Exchange's Disaster
Recovery Facility would not have connectivity to designated market
maker (``DMM'') and Floor broker trading systems, the Exchange would
operate as a fully electronic exchange when operating out of its
Disaster Recovery Facility, even if 11 Wall Street facilities were
not impacted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Consistent with the Exchange's business continuity plan, opening
and reopening auctions of Exchange-traded securities traded on the
Disaster Recovery Facility would be subject to Rule 123D(a)(2)-(6) and
closing auctions would be subject to Supplementary Material .10 to Rule
123C.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(B). The Exchange states
that, because there would be no Trading Floor or DMM connectivity,
the Exchange would facilitate all openings, reopenings, and
closings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Any unexecuted Exchange-traded securities orders entered into
the Exchange's systems prior to commencing trading on the Disaster
Recovery Facility would be deemed canceled and would be purged from the
Exchange's systems.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(C). The Exchange states
that the orders would have to be canceled because, depending on the
scope of the disruption, the Exchange may be unable to transmit
cancellation messages for unexecuted orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Member organizations registered as DMMs would not be subject to
any DMM obligations or benefits under Exchange rules while securities
trade on the Disaster Recovery Facility.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(2)(D). See also Exchange
Rule 103B(I) (quoting requirements for allocation process of listed
securities) and Rule 104 (Dealings and Responsibilities of DMMs).
According to the Exchange, DMMs would not be subject to any such
obligations or benefits because the Exchange would not maintain
systems that support DMM quoting at its Disaster Recovery Facility.
Therefore, DMMs that route orders to the Disaster Recovery Facility
would trade in a manner similar to other market participants that
electronically enter orders at the Exchange, and DMMs would be
subject to the same fees and credits applicable to non-DMM
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Disaster Recovery Facility and the revised business continuity
and disaster recovery plans would allow the Exchange to no longer
designate NYSE Arca as its backup facility but instead operate as a
fully electronic exchange on its own facilities under its own trading
rules, with its own order book and with quotes and trades publicly
reported as quotes and trades of the Exchange, rather than as quotes
and trades of NYSE Arca. Member organizations wishing to trade on the
Exchange's Disaster Recovery Facility would be responsible for having
contingency plans for establishing connectivity to that facility and
changing routing instructions for their order entry systems to send
bids and offers in Exchange-traded securities to that facility.\19\ The
proposed rule change would also require member organizations to
participate in scheduled functional and performance testing of the
Exchange's business continuity and disaster recovery plans in the
manner and frequency specified by the Exchange, which shall not be less
than once every 12 months.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(a)(3).
\20\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to delete certain current Rule 49 text
that will be rendered obsolete or unnecessary by the proposal. This
text includes certain terms, references to NYSE Arca, limits on the
operative period for emergency powers, and notifications to the
Commission.\21\ In addition the Exchange has proposed non-substantive
conforming changes to Exchange Rules 49(b)(N), 431, and 438, to update
numbering and cross-references.\22\ Finally, the Exchange proposes to
amend Exchange Rule 51 to govern the circumstances under which the
Exchange's Chief Executive Officer (``CEO'') may determine to have the
Exchange trade securities on its Disaster Recovery Facility.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Commission notes that, under Regulation SCI, the
Exchange would be required to notify the Commission of any ``SCI
event,'' such as a systems disruption that caused the Exchange to
use its Disaster Recovery Facility. See 17 CFR 242.1002(b)(1).
\22\ The Exchange proposes to designate this paragraph of
proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N) with an ``N'' to distinguish it from
current Exchange Rule 49(b), as both would be operative at the same
time.
\23\ The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 51(b) to
provide the Exchange's CEO with the authority to determine whether
to use the Exchange's Disaster Recovery Facility. The Exchange also
proposes to make a conforming amendment to Exchange Rule 51(c) to
specify that the CEO shall take any of the actions described in
Exchange Rule 51(b) only when such action is deemed necessary or
appropriate for the maintenance of a fair and orderly market, or the
protection of investors of otherwise in the public interest, due to
extraordinary circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 67031]]
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review of the proposal, as modified by Amendment Nos.
1 and No. 2, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\24\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\25\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ In approving these proposed rule changes, the Commission
has considered the proposed rules' impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under amended Exchange Rule 49, the Exchange would maintain its own
Disaster Recovery Facility to continue Exchange operations when
necessary without substantial disruption to member organizations. This
Disaster Recovery Facility would allow the Exchange to no longer
designate NYSE Arca as its backup facility but instead operate as a
fully electronic exchange on its own facilities, under its own trading
rules, with its own order book and with quotes and trades publicly
reported under the Exchange's own reporting symbol. The proposed rule
change would also require member organizations to participate in
scheduled functional and performance testing of the Exchange's business
continuity and disaster recovery plans in the manner and frequency
specified by the Exchange, which shall not be less than once every 12
months.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Proposed Exchange Rule 49(b)(N).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposal, the Exchange CEO would be authorized to make a
determination for the Exchange to trade securities on the Disaster
Recovery Facility only when the CEO deems such action to be necessary
or appropriate for the maintenance of a fair and orderly market, or for
the protection of investors or otherwise in the public interest, due to
extraordinary circumstances. The Exchange CEO must notify the Exchange
board of directors as soon as feasible if the CEO makes a determination
to use the Disaster Recovery Facility.
The Commission believes that the proposal is reasonably designed to
permit the Exchange to continue to operate in the event of an emergency
by using a secondary data center located in a geographically diverse
location to open, trade, and close Exchange-listed securities.
Accordingly, the Commission believes that the proposal is designed to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and to protect investors and the
public interest, and the Commission therefore finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\27\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2016-48), as modified
by Amendments No. 1 and Partial Amendment No. 2, be, and hereby is,
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-23494 Filed 9-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P