Essar Steel Minnesota LLC, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Essar Global Fund Limited Including On-Site Leased Workers From Express Employment Professionals, Always There Staffing, Vesterheim Geoscience PLC, and Rod Johnson & Associates, Hibbing, Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 66090 [2016-23027]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
66090
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Notices
Signed in Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–23030 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–91,051]
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Carter Fuel Systems, a Subsidiary of
Crowne Group LLC, Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Aerotek,
Crossfire Group, and Entegee
Engineering, Logansport, Indiana;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on April 24, 2016, applicable
to workers of Carter Fuel Systems, a
subsidiary of Crowne Group LLC,
including on-site leased workers from
Aerotek and CrossFire Group,
Logansport, Indiana (TA–W–91,051).
The Department’s notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on May 24, 2016 (81
FR 32783).
At the request of the company official
of the workers’ firm, the Department
reviewed the certification for workers of
the subject firm. The workers were
engaged in activities related to the
production of fuel pumps.
The company reports that workers
leased from Entegee Engineering were
employed on-site at the Logansport,
Indiana location of Carter Fuel Systems,
a subsidiary of Crowne Group LLC. The
Department has determined that these
workers were sufficiently under the
control of the subject firm to be
considered leased workers. The intent of
the Department’s certification is to
include all workers of the subject firm
who were adversely affected by
acquisition of fuel pumps or articles like
or directly competitive from a foreign
country.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Entegee Engineering working onsite at the Logansport, Indiana location
of Carter Fuel Systems, a subsidiary of
Crowne Group LLC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 Sep 23, 2016
Jkt 238001
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–91,051 is hereby issued as
follows:
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the
law justified reconsideration of the decision.
All workers of Carter Fuel Systems, a
subsidiary of Crowne Group LLC, including
on-site leased workers from Aerotek,
CrossFire Group, and Entegee Engineering,
Logansport, Indiana who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after October 1, 2014 through April 24, 2018
and all workers in the group threatened with
total or partial separation from employment
on date of certification through two years
from the date of certification, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974,
as amended.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that that imports did not
increase, and that the workers’ firm does
not import machining and construction
services. Further, the firm did not shift
the supply of machining and
construction services or like or directly
competitive services to a foreign country
or acquire machining and construction
services or like or directly competitive
services from a foreign country. Further,
the firm is not a Supplier to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a). The services supplied by
the workers firm were not used in the
production of an article, iron ore.
Finally, the firm does not act as a
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19
U.S.C. 2272(a).
The request for reconsideration
asserts that this determination is
erroneous and that the subject firm
workers should be considered in
production of mining. The request also
included additional information relating
to this statement.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of
August 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–23029 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–91,325]
Essar Steel Minnesota LLC, a Wholly
Owned Subsidiary of Essar Global
Fund Limited Including On-Site Leased
Workers From Express Employment
Professionals, Always There Staffing,
Vesterheim Geoscience PLC, and Rod
Johnson & Associates, Hibbing,
Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated May 2, 2016, the
state workforce office requested
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance applicable to
workers and former workers of Essar
Steel Minnesota LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary Essar Global Fund Limited,
including on-site leased workers from
Express Employment Professionals,
Always There Staffing, Vesterheim
Geoscience PLC, Rod Johnson &
Associates, Hibbing, Minnesota. The
determination was issued on April 8,
2016.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not
previously considered that the determination
complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered; or
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
August, 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–23027 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM
26SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 66090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23027]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-91,325]
Essar Steel Minnesota LLC, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Essar
Global Fund Limited Including On-Site Leased Workers From Express
Employment Professionals, Always There Staffing, Vesterheim Geoscience
PLC, and Rod Johnson & Associates, Hibbing, Minnesota; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated May 2, 2016, the state workforce office
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Essar Steel
Minnesota LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary Essar Global Fund Limited,
including on-site leased workers from Express Employment Professionals,
Always There Staffing, Vesterheim Geoscience PLC, Rod Johnson &
Associates, Hibbing, Minnesota. The determination was issued on April
8, 2016.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously
considered that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based
on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously
considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration
of the decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that that imports did not increase, and that the
workers' firm does not import machining and construction services.
Further, the firm did not shift the supply of machining and
construction services or like or directly competitive services to a
foreign country or acquire machining and construction services or like
or directly competitive services from a foreign country. Further, the
firm is not a Supplier to a firm that employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The services supplied by the workers firm were
not used in the production of an article, iron ore. Finally, the firm
does not act as a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group
of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section
222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a).
The request for reconsideration asserts that this determination is
erroneous and that the subject firm workers should be considered in
production of mining. The request also included additional information
relating to this statement.
The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of August, 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016-23027 Filed 9-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
