Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 62729-62731 [2016-21859]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, the Department may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: September 6, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2016–21866 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am] sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–928] Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 10, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units (‘‘innersprings’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results, and based upon our analysis of the comments and information received, we made certain changes for these final results. In these final results, we determine that innersprings are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. The final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective September 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6491. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background This review covers two exporters of subject merchandise: East Grace Corporation (‘‘East Grace’’) and Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer (‘‘Macao Commercial’’). The Department published the preliminary results on March 10, 2016.1 A summary of the events that occurred since the Department published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, may be found in 1 See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 12688 (March 10, 2016) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62729 the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Also, as explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its authority to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government.3 As a consequence, all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the final results is now September 6, 2016. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units.4 The product is currently classified under subheading 9404.29.9010 and has also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or 7320.90.5010, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in parties’ case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated herein by reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. The Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. The signed and electronic 2 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014–2015 Administrative Review’’ (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), dated concurrently with this notice. 3 Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016, extending all administrative deadlines by four business days. 4 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete description of the Scope of the Order. E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1 62730 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Companies That Did Not Establish Their Eligibility for a Separate Rate In the Preliminary Results, the Department found that East Grace failed to establish its eligibility to receive a separate rate and that it was, thus, part of the PRC-wide entity.5 The Department has not received any comments that would warrant a review of that determination. Therefore, we continue to find that East Grace is part of the PRC-wide entity for purposes of this review. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the PRC-wide entity is not under review and therefore its rate is not subject to change.6 The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding is 234.51 percent. Changes Since the Preliminary Results In the Preliminary Results, we found that Macao Commercial had no shipments of PRC-origin innersprings during the POR and, therefore, had no reviewable shipments.7 However, after considering comments raised by interested parties and additional questionnaire responses submitted after the Preliminary Results, the Department is revising its preliminary results with respect to Macao Commercial. Specifically, we determine that use of facts available with respect to Macao Commercial is warranted pursuant to section 776(a)(1) & (2)(A), (B), and (C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). We are also applying an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts available, pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, because we find that Macao Commercial failed to cooperate to the best of its ability in providing the requested information. Based on the foregoing, we find that Macao Commercial has failed to demonstrate that it had no shipments of PRC-origin innersprings during the POR, and we are assigning a rate to Macao Commercial using adverse facts available. As part of this determination, we have not adopted petitioner Leggett and Platt, Inc.’s suggestion that the Department also find that the country of origin of all of Macao Commercial’s exports of innersprings to the United States during 5 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 12689. Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 7 See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 12689. 6 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 the POR is the PRC. However, the information placed on the record during this administrative review as well as prior circumvention findings in this proceeding 8 raise a concern that there are entries which should be subject to the Order but currently are not. The Department intends to consider these facts to determine if it would be appropriate for the Department to selfinitiate a circumvention inquiry. Final Results of Review The weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015, is as follows: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Exporter previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the exporter was reviewed; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the PRC-wide entity of 234.51 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter with the subject merchandise. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final 234.51 reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR Assessment 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the of the relevant entries during this POR. Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s shall assess, antidumping duties on all presumption that reimbursement of appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review antidumping duties. in the Federal Register. For East Grace, Administrative Protective Order the Department will instruct CBP to In accordance with 19 CFR assess antidumping duties on the 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as companies’ entries of subject a final reminder to parties subject to merchandise (i.e., PRC-origin administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) innersprings) at the rate for the PRCof their responsibility concerning the entity of 234.51 percent. For Macao return or destruction of proprietary Commercial, the Department will information disclosed under APO, instruct CBP to assess antidumping which continues to govern business duties on the companies’ entries of proprietary information in this segment subject merchandise (i.e., PRC-origin of the proceeding. Timely written innersprings) at the individuallynotification of the return or destruction assigned rate of 234.51 percent. of APO materials, or conversion to Cash Deposit Requirements judicial protective order, is hereby The following cash deposit requested. Failure to comply with the requirements will be effective upon regulations and terms of an APO is a publication of the final results of this violation which is subject to sanction. administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, administrative review and notice in for consumption on or after the accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and publication date, as provided for by 777(i) of the Act. section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporter listed above, the cash Dated: September 6, 2016. deposit rate will be 234.51 percent for Christian Marsh, their entries of subject merchandise (i.e., Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping PRC-origin innersprings); (2) for and Countervailing Duty Operations. Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress Manufacturer ..................... 8 See, e.g., Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 3345 (January 21, 2014). PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Issue 5. Application of Facts Available 6. Affiliations 7. Sales Process 8. Q&V Information Financial Statements/ Sales Reconciliations 9. Cost Reconciliations 10. Use of Adverse Inferences 11. Country of Origin 12. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016–21859 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Open Meeting of the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity will meet Monday, September 19, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time at the American University Washington College of Law, Claudio Grossman Hall, Yuma Building. The primary purpose of the meeting is to discuss the challenges and opportunities for organizations and consumers in securing the digital economy. In particular, the meeting will address: (1) International concerns; (2) review of current state of cybersecurity; (3) growing and securing the digital economy; and (4) innovation and technology in the government. The meeting will support detailed recommendations to strengthen cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors while protecting privacy, ensuring public safety and economic and national security, fostering discovery and development of new technical solutions, and bolstering partnerships between Federal, State, local, tribal and territorial governments and the private sector in the development, promotion, and use of cybersecurity technologies, policies, and best practices. All sessions will be open to the public. DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 19, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the American University Washington College of Law, Claudio Grossman Hall, Yuma Building, located at 4300 Nebraska Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20016. The meeting is open to the public and interested parties are requested to contact Sara Kerman at the contact information indicated in the FOR sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 section of this notice in advance of the meeting for building entrance requirements. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Kerman, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 2000, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8900, telephone: 301–975–4634, or by email at: eo-commission@nist.gov. Please use subject line ‘‘Open Meeting of the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity—DC’’. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App., notice is hereby given that the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity (‘‘the Commission’’) will meet Monday, September 19, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. All sessions will be open to the public. The Commission is authorized by Executive Order 13718, Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity.1 The Commission was established by the President and will make detailed recommendations to strengthen cybersecurity in both the public and private sectors while protecting privacy, ensuring public safety and economic and national security, fostering discovery and development of new technical solutions, and bolstering partnerships between Federal, State, local, tribal and territorial governments and the private sector in the development, promotion, and use of cybersecurity technologies, policies, and best practices. The agenda is expected to include the following items: —Introductions —Panel discussion on International Concerns —Panel discussion—Current State Review—‘‘How did we get here?’’ —Panel discussion on Growing and Securing the Digital Economy —Panel discussion on Embracing Innovation and Technology in the Government —Conclusion Note that agenda items may change without notice. The final agenda will be posted on http://www.nist.gov/ cybercommission. Seating will be available for the public and media. No registration is required to attend this meeting; however, on-site attendees are asked to voluntarily sign in and space will be available on a first-come, firstserved basis. Public Participation: The Commission agenda will include a period of time, FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 1 https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2016/ 02/12/2016-03038/commission-on-enhancingnational-cybersecurity. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62731 not to exceed fifteen minutes, for oral comments from the public on Monday, September 19, 2016 from 4:15 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time. Speakers will be selected on a first-come, first-served basis. Each speaker will be limited to five minutes. Questions from the public will not be considered during this period. Members of the public who are interested in speaking are requested to contact Sara Kerman at the contact information indicated in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice. Speakers who wish to expand upon their oral statements, those who had wished to speak but could not be accommodated on the agenda, and those who were unable to attend in person are invited to submit written statements. In addition, written statements are invited and may be submitted to the Commission at any time. All written statements should be directed to the Commission Executive Director, Information Technology Laboratory, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8900, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8900 or by email at: cybercommission@nist.gov. Please use subject line ‘‘Open Meeting of the Commission on Enhancing National Cybersecurity—DC’’. Pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.150(b), this Federal Register notice for this meeting is being published fewer than 15 calendar days prior to the meeting as exceptional circumstances exist. It is imperative that the meeting be held on September 19, 2016 to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants, who must maintain a strict schedule of meetings in order to complete the Commission’s report by December 1, 2016, as required by Executive Order 13718 § 3(e) (February 9, 2016). Notice of the meeting is also posted on the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s Web site at http://www.nist.gov/cybercommission. Kevin Kimball, Chief of Staff. [FR Doc. 2016–21813 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XE875 Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62729-62731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21859]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-928]


Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 10, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on uncovered innerspring units 
(``innersprings'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). We 
gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary 
results, and based upon our analysis of the comments and information 
received, we made certain changes for these final results. In these 
final results, we determine that innersprings are being, or are likely 
to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. The period of 
review (``POR'') is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. The 
final weighted-average dumping margins are listed below in the ``Final 
Results of Review'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective September 12, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Hawkins, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6491.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This review covers two exporters of subject merchandise: East Grace 
Corporation (``East Grace'') and Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring 
Mattress Manufacturer (``Macao Commercial'').
    The Department published the preliminary results on March 10, 
2016.\1\ A summary of the events that occurred since the Department 
published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the 
issues raised by parties for these final results, may be found in the 
Final Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 12688 (March 10, 2016) (``Preliminary 
Results'') and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2014-
2015 Administrative Review'' (``Issues and Decision Memorandum''), 
dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also, as explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its 
authority to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent 
closure of the Federal Government.\3\ As a consequence, all deadlines 
in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business 
days. The revised deadline for the final results is now September 6, 
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for 
Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative 
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm 
Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016, extending all administrative 
deadlines by four business days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring 
units.\4\ The product is currently classified under subheading 
9404.29.9010 and has also been classified under subheadings 
9404.10.0000, 7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or 7320.90.5010, of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). The HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the 
written product description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a complete 
description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in parties' case and rebuttal briefs are 
addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated 
herein by reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to 
which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached 
to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
http://access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. The Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic

[[Page 62730]]

versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Companies That Did Not Establish Their Eligibility for a Separate Rate

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department found that East Grace 
failed to establish its eligibility to receive a separate rate and that 
it was, thus, part of the PRC-wide entity.\5\ The Department has not 
received any comments that would warrant a review of that 
determination. Therefore, we continue to find that East Grace is part 
of the PRC-wide entity for purposes of this review. Because no party 
requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the PRC-wide 
entity is not under review and therefore its rate is not subject to 
change.\6\ The rate previously established for the PRC-wide entity in 
this proceeding is 234.51 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 12689.
    \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    In the Preliminary Results, we found that Macao Commercial had no 
shipments of PRC-origin innersprings during the POR and, therefore, had 
no reviewable shipments.\7\ However, after considering comments raised 
by interested parties and additional questionnaire responses submitted 
after the Preliminary Results, the Department is revising its 
preliminary results with respect to Macao Commercial. Specifically, we 
determine that use of facts available with respect to Macao Commercial 
is warranted pursuant to section 776(a)(1) & (2)(A), (B), and (C) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). We are also applying 
an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts available, 
pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, because we find that Macao 
Commercial failed to cooperate to the best of its ability in providing 
the requested information. Based on the foregoing, we find that Macao 
Commercial has failed to demonstrate that it had no shipments of PRC-
origin innersprings during the POR, and we are assigning a rate to 
Macao Commercial using adverse facts available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Results, 81 FR at 12689.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of this determination, we have not adopted petitioner 
Leggett and Platt, Inc.'s suggestion that the Department also find that 
the country of origin of all of Macao Commercial's exports of 
innersprings to the United States during the POR is the PRC. However, 
the information placed on the record during this administrative review 
as well as prior circumvention findings in this proceeding \8\ raise a 
concern that there are entries which should be subject to the Order but 
currently are not. The Department intends to consider these facts to 
determine if it would be appropriate for the Department to self-
initiate a circumvention inquiry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See, e.g., Uncovered Innerspring Units from the People's 
Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention 
of the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 3345 (January 21, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    The weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 
2014, through January 31, 2015, is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                          dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Macao Commercial and Industrial Spring Mattress                   234.51
 Manufacturer...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the date of publication of the final results of review in the 
Federal Register. For East Grace, the Department will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping duties on the companies' entries of subject 
merchandise (i.e., PRC-origin innersprings) at the rate for the PRC-
entity of 234.51 percent. For Macao Commercial, the Department will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on the companies' entries of 
subject merchandise (i.e., PRC-origin innersprings) at the 
individually-assigned rate of 234.51 percent.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn 
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporter 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will be 234.51 percent for their 
entries of subject merchandise (i.e., PRC-origin innersprings); (2) for 
previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the exporter was 
reviewed; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have 
not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 
will be that established for the PRC-wide entity of 234.51 percent; and 
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not 
received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter with 
the subject merchandise. The deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Reimbursement of Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 
a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order 
(``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction 
of proprietary information disclosed under APO, which continues to 
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: September 6, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.

Appendix I--List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background

[[Page 62731]]

3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Issue
5. Application of Facts Available
6. Affiliations
7. Sales Process
8. Q&V Information Financial Statements/Sales Reconciliations
9. Cost Reconciliations
10. Use of Adverse Inferences
11. Country of Origin
12. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-21859 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P