Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 62715-62717 [2016-21858]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices
investigation, 36.52 percent,4 if there is
no rate for the intermediary involved in
the transaction.
Period of Review
The period of review is February 1,
2014, through January 31, 2015.
Final Results of the Review
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we did not make
any changes to the weighted-average
dumping margin calculated for
Electrolux in the Preliminary Results.
Therefore, we are assigning the
following weighted-average dumping
margin for the period February 1, 2014,
through January 31, 2015:
Manufacturer/exporter
Electrolux Home Products
Corp. NV/Electrolux Home
Products de Mexico, S.A.
de C.V ...............................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
2.47
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
41 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
For Electrolux, the Department
calculated ad valorem importer-specific
assessment rates equal to the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of those sales. Where an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate these entries without
regard to antidumping duties pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
If applicable, this clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Electrolux,
for which the company did not know
that its merchandise was destined for
the United States.3 In such instances, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate these
entries at the all-others rate established
in the less-than fair-value (LTFV)
3 See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will
be equal to the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this administrative review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recentlycompleted segment; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original LTFV
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 36.52
percent, the all-others rate determined
in the LTFV investigation.5 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
4 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders,
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) (AD Order).
5 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62715
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the
Department’s regulations.
Dated: August 30, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of Issues
1. Zeroing
2. Methodological Issues in the Differential
Pricing Analysis
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–21500 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–868]
Large Residential Washers From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 11, 2016, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the second administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on large residential washers
(LRWs) from Korea. The review covers
one producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise: LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE).
We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment. After
reviewing the comments received, we
continue to find that LGE made sales of
subject merchandise to the United
States at prices below normal value.
LGE’s final dumping margin is listed
below in the section entitled ‘‘Final
Results of the Review.’’
DATES: Effective September 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
62716
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4136 or (202) 482–4952,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise:
LGE. On March 11, 2016, the
Department published the Preliminary
Results.1 Based on our analysis of the
comments received from Whirlpool
Corporation (the petitioner) and LGE,
we are changing the weighted-average
dumping margin calculated for LGE in
the Preliminary Results. The
Department conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
all large residential washers and certain
subassemblies thereof from Korea. The
products are currently classifiable under
subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
System of the United States (HTSUS).
Products subject to this order may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive.2
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues which parties raised
and to which we respond in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached
to this notice as Appendix I.
Period of Review
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
The period of review is February 1,
2014, through January 31, 2015.
1 See Large Residential Washers From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 81 FR 12875 (March 11, 2016) (Preliminary
Results).
2 A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large
Residential Washers from the Republic of Korea,’’
dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Final Results of the Review
Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made changes to
the weighted-average dumping margin
calculated for LGE in the Preliminary
Results. Therefore, we are assigning the
following weighted-average dumping
margin for the period February 1, 2014,
through January 31, 2015:
Manufacturer/exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
LG Electronics, Inc ...............
1.62
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the
Department has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review. The
Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP
15 days after publication of the final
results of this administrative review.
For LGE, the Department calculated
ad valorem importer-specific
assessment rates equal to the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of those sales. Where an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5
percent), the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate these entries without
regard to antidumping duties pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by LGE, for
which the company did not know that
its merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate these entries at the all-others
rate established in the less-than fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, 11.80
percent,3 if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the
transaction.4
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
3 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and
the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders,
78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) (AD Order).
4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for LGE will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
LTFV investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently-completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 11.80
percent, the all-others rate determined
in the LTFV investigation.5 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in
accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
5 See
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
Assessment Policy Notice.
12SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices
Dated: September 6, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise
Entered Prior to Date of Suspension
2. Whether Defective Merchandise Is
Outside of the Scope
3. Exclusion of Re-Sales of Defective
Merchandise
4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted
U.S. Sales
5. Methodological Issues in the Differential
Pricing Analysis
6. Zeroing
7. Subassembly Import Value in
Assessment Rate
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016–21858 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–802]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 2014–
2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 10, 2016, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published in the
Federal Register the preliminary results
of the tenth administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
warmwater shrimp from the Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’). Based
upon our analysis of the comments and
information received, we determine that
Stapimex sold subject merchandise at
less than normal value (‘‘NV’’) during
the period of review (‘‘POR’’), February
1, 2014, through January 31, 2015.
DATES: Effective September 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
10, 2016, the Department published the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Sep 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Preliminary Results.1 On March 11,
2016, VASEP 2 filed surrogate value
information rebutting certain surrogate
values we applied in the Preliminary
Results. We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On March 11, 2016,
Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fish One’’)
requested a public hearing and filed its
case brief on April 1, 2016. On April 25,
2016, VASEP filed a case brief. On May
2, 2016, Petitioner 3 and Domestic
Processors 4 filed their rebuttal briefs.
On June 17, 2016, the Department
extended the time limit for these final
results by 60 days.
On July 6, 2016, VASEP, Petitioner,
and Domestic Processors withdrew their
requests for review with respect to the
Minh Phu Group and requested that the
Department exercise its authority to
extend the 90-day deadline to withdraw
the requests for review and rescind the
administrative review, in part, under
extraordinary circumstances.5 On July
18, 2016, we determined that the parties
demonstrated that extraordinary
circumstances exist for this segment of
the proceeding and, thus, found that
good cause existed to extend the
deadline to withdraw their respective
review requests of the Minh Phu Group,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.302(b). We
rescinded the review with respect to the
Minh Phu Group on July 22, 2016.6
Scope of the Order 7
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.
The product is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States item
numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06,
0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12,
0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18,
0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24,
0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40,
1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. The
1 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Partial Rescission of Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR
12702 (March 10, 2016) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and
Producers (‘‘VASEP’’).
3 Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee
(‘‘Petitioner’’).
4 American Shrimp Processors Association
(‘‘Domestic Processors’’).
5 See Withdrawal of Review Requests from
VASEP, Petitioner and Domestic Processors, dated
July 6, 2016.
6 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews (2014–
2015; 2015–2016) and Compromise of Outstanding
Claims, 81 FR 47758 (July 22, 2016).
7 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 70 FR 5152
(February 1, 2005) (‘‘Order’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62717
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive. A full description
of the scope of the Order is available in
the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.8
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this review
are addressed in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum.9 A
list of the issues which parties raised,
and to which we respond in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum is attached
to this notice as an Appendix. The
Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, the
Department determined the following
companies did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR: (1) BIM
Seafood Joint Stock Company; (2) Bien
Dong Seafood Co., Ltd.; (3) Cafatex
Fishery Joint Stock Corporation; (4)
Camranh Seafoods Processing
Enterprise Pte.; (5) Coastal Fisheries
Development Corporation; (6) Bentre
Forestry Aquaproduct Import-Export
Joint Stock Company; (7) Fine Foods
Co.; (8) Gallant Ocean (Vietnam) Co.,
Ltd.; (9) Long Toan Frozen Aquatic
Products Joint Stock Company; (10)
Nhat Duc Co., Ltd.; (11) Ngo Bros
Seaproducts Import-Export One Member
Company Limited; (12) Thong Thuan
Seafood Company Limited; (13) Tacvan
Seafoods Company; (14) Tan Phong Phu
Seafood Co., Ltd.; and (15) Vinh Hoan
Corporation. As we have not received
any information to contradict this
8 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, From Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, Certain Frozen
Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results, (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’) dated concurrently and hereby
adopted by this notice.
9 Id.
E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM
12SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62715-62717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21858]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-868]
Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 11, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of the second administrative review
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs)
from Korea. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise: LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE). We gave interested parties an
opportunity to comment. After reviewing the comments received, we
continue to find that LGE made sales of subject merchandise to the
United States at prices below normal value. LGE's final dumping margin
is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the
Review.''
DATES: Effective September 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration,
[[Page 62716]]
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise:
LGE. On March 11, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary
Results.\1\ Based on our analysis of the comments received from
Whirlpool Corporation (the petitioner) and LGE, we are changing the
weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the Preliminary
Results. The Department conducted this administrative review in
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2014-2015, 81 FR 12875 (March 11, 2016) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are all large residential washers
and certain subassemblies thereof from Korea. The products are
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this
scope is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review of Large Residential Washers from the Republic
of Korea,'' dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties
raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is
attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Period of Review
The period of review is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015.
Final Results of the Review
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to
the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the
Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are assigning the following
weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2014,
through January 31, 2015:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average dumping
Manufacturer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LG Electronics, Inc.................................... 1.62
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this
proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final
results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this administrative review.
For LGE, the Department calculated ad valorem importer-specific
assessment rates equal to the total amount of dumping calculated for
the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those
sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to
liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping duties pursuant
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by LGE,
for which the company did not know that its merchandise was destined
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries
at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, 11.80 percent,\3\ if there is no rate for the
intermediary involved in the transaction.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013)
(AD Order).
\4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate
for LGE will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to
be 11.80 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV
investigation.\5\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Assessment Policy Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
[[Page 62717]]
Dated: September 6, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise Entered Prior to Date of
Suspension
2. Whether Defective Merchandise Is Outside of the Scope
3. Exclusion of Re-Sales of Defective Merchandise
4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted U.S. Sales
5. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing Analysis
6. Zeroing
7. Subassembly Import Value in Assessment Rate
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-21858 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
