Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 62715-62717 [2016-21858]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices investigation, 36.52 percent,4 if there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the transaction. Period of Review The period of review is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. Final Results of the Review Based on our analysis of the comments received, we did not make any changes to the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for Electrolux in the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015: Manufacturer/exporter Electrolux Home Products Corp. NV/Electrolux Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V ............................... Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 2.47 We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 41 days after publication of the final results of this administrative review. For Electrolux, the Department calculated ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates equal to the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of those sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping duties pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If applicable, this clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Electrolux, for which the company did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States.3 In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair-value (LTFV) 3 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Electrolux will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recentlycompleted segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 36.52 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV investigation.5 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 4 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) (AD Order). 5 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62715 written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5) of the Department’s regulations. Dated: August 30, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Margin Calculations IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of Issues 1. Zeroing 2. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing Analysis VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016–21500 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 a.m.] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–868] Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 11, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the second administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs) from Korea. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise: LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE). We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment. After reviewing the comments received, we continue to find that LGE made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at prices below normal value. LGE’s final dumping margin is listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective September 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1 62716 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–4952, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The review covers one producer/ exporter of the subject merchandise: LGE. On March 11, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results.1 Based on our analysis of the comments received from Whirlpool Corporation (the petitioner) and LGE, we are changing the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the Preliminary Results. The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are all large residential washers and certain subassemblies thereof from Korea. The products are currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this scope is dispositive.2 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Period of Review sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES The period of review is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. 1 See Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 12875 (March 11, 2016) (Preliminary Results). 2 A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Large Residential Washers from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 Final Results of the Review Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are assigning the following weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015: Manufacturer/exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) LG Electronics, Inc ............... 1.62 We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this administrative review. For LGE, the Department calculated ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates equal to the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of those sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping duties pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by LGE, for which the company did not know that its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, 11.80 percent,3 if there is no rate for the intermediary involved in the transaction.4 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the 3 See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) (AD Order). 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for LGE will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 11.80 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV investigation.5 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 5 See E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM Assessment Policy Notice. 12SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 176 / Monday, September 12, 2016 / Notices Dated: September 6, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Margin Calculations IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of the Issues 1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise Entered Prior to Date of Suspension 2. Whether Defective Merchandise Is Outside of the Scope 3. Exclusion of Re-Sales of Defective Merchandise 4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted U.S. Sales 5. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing Analysis 6. Zeroing 7. Subassembly Import Value in Assessment Rate VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016–21858 Filed 9–9–16; 8:45 a.m.] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–552–802] Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2014– 2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 10, 2016, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the tenth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain warmwater shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (‘‘Vietnam’’). Based upon our analysis of the comments and information received, we determine that Stapimex sold subject merchandise at less than normal value (‘‘NV’’) during the period of review (‘‘POR’’), February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. DATES: Effective September 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6905. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 10, 2016, the Department published the sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:40 Sep 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 Preliminary Results.1 On March 11, 2016, VASEP 2 filed surrogate value information rebutting certain surrogate values we applied in the Preliminary Results. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. On March 11, 2016, Viet Hai Seafood Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fish One’’) requested a public hearing and filed its case brief on April 1, 2016. On April 25, 2016, VASEP filed a case brief. On May 2, 2016, Petitioner 3 and Domestic Processors 4 filed their rebuttal briefs. On June 17, 2016, the Department extended the time limit for these final results by 60 days. On July 6, 2016, VASEP, Petitioner, and Domestic Processors withdrew their requests for review with respect to the Minh Phu Group and requested that the Department exercise its authority to extend the 90-day deadline to withdraw the requests for review and rescind the administrative review, in part, under extraordinary circumstances.5 On July 18, 2016, we determined that the parties demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist for this segment of the proceeding and, thus, found that good cause existed to extend the deadline to withdraw their respective review requests of the Minh Phu Group, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.302(b). We rescinded the review with respect to the Minh Phu Group on July 22, 2016.6 Scope of the Order 7 The merchandise subject to the order is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. The product is currently classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States item numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40, 1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10. The 1 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission of Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 12702 (March 10, 2016) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 Vietnam Association of Seafood Exporters and Producers (‘‘VASEP’’). 3 Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’). 4 American Shrimp Processors Association (‘‘Domestic Processors’’). 5 See Withdrawal of Review Requests from VASEP, Petitioner and Domestic Processors, dated July 6, 2016. 6 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews (2014– 2015; 2015–2016) and Compromise of Outstanding Claims, 81 FR 47758 (July 22, 2016). 7 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, 70 FR 5152 (February 1, 2005) (‘‘Order’’). PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62717 written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the Order is available in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.8 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review are addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.9 A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined the following companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR: (1) BIM Seafood Joint Stock Company; (2) Bien Dong Seafood Co., Ltd.; (3) Cafatex Fishery Joint Stock Corporation; (4) Camranh Seafoods Processing Enterprise Pte.; (5) Coastal Fisheries Development Corporation; (6) Bentre Forestry Aquaproduct Import-Export Joint Stock Company; (7) Fine Foods Co.; (8) Gallant Ocean (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.; (9) Long Toan Frozen Aquatic Products Joint Stock Company; (10) Nhat Duc Co., Ltd.; (11) Ngo Bros Seaproducts Import-Export One Member Company Limited; (12) Thong Thuan Seafood Company Limited; (13) Tacvan Seafoods Company; (14) Tan Phong Phu Seafood Co., Ltd.; and (15) Vinh Hoan Corporation. As we have not received any information to contradict this 8 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, From Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results, (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’) dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice. 9 Id. E:\FR\FM\12SEN1.SGM 12SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62715-62717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-868]


Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: Final 
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On March 11, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published the preliminary results of the second administrative review 
of the antidumping duty (AD) order on large residential washers (LRWs) 
from Korea. The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject 
merchandise: LG Electronics, Inc. (LGE). We gave interested parties an 
opportunity to comment. After reviewing the comments received, we 
continue to find that LGE made sales of subject merchandise to the 
United States at prices below normal value. LGE's final dumping margin 
is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of the 
Review.''

DATES: Effective September 12, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger or Ross Belliveau, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration,

[[Page 62716]]

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4952, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise: 
LGE. On March 11, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\ Based on our analysis of the comments received from 
Whirlpool Corporation (the petitioner) and LGE, we are changing the 
weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the Preliminary 
Results. The Department conducted this administrative review in 
accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Large Residential Washers From the Republic of Korea: 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2014-2015, 81 FR 12875 (March 11, 2016) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all large residential washers 
and certain subassemblies thereof from Korea. The products are 
currently classifiable under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and 8450.20.0080 
of the Harmonized Tariff System of the United States (HTSUS). Products 
subject to this order may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080, 8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000. Although 
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to this 
scope is dispositive.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in 
the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 
and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Large Residential Washers from the Republic 
of Korea,'' dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties 
raised and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is 
attached to this notice as Appendix I.

Period of Review

    The period of review is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015.

Final Results of the Review

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made changes to 
the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for LGE in the 
Preliminary Results. Therefore, we are assigning the following 
weighted-average dumping margin for the period February 1, 2014, 
through January 31, 2015:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                                                         average dumping
                 Manufacturer/exporter                        margin
                                                            (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LG Electronics, Inc....................................            1.62
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed within five days 
of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this 
proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), the Department has determined, and U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final 
results of this review. The Department intends to issue appropriate 
assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this administrative review.
    For LGE, the Department calculated ad valorem importer-specific 
assessment rates equal to the total amount of dumping calculated for 
the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of those 
sales. Where an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis 
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the Department will instruct CBP to 
liquidate these entries without regard to antidumping duties pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by LGE, 
for which the company did not know that its merchandise was destined 
for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate these entries 
at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, 11.80 percent,\3\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediary involved in the transaction.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Large Residential Washers From Mexico and the Republic 
of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 78 FR 11148 (February 15, 2013) 
(AD Order).
    \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate 
for LGE will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for 
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently-completed segment; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original 
LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate established for the most recently-completed segment of this 
proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to 
be 11.80 percent, the all-others rate determined in the LTFV 
investigation.\5\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Assessment Policy Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Act.


[[Page 62717]]


    Dated: September 6, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Margin Calculations
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of the Issues
    1. Exclusion of Sales of Merchandise Entered Prior to Date of 
Suspension
    2. Whether Defective Merchandise Is Outside of the Scope
    3. Exclusion of Re-Sales of Defective Merchandise
    4. Exclusion of Potentially Double-Counted U.S. Sales
    5. Methodological Issues in the Differential Pricing Analysis
    6. Zeroing
    7. Subassembly Import Value in Assessment Rate
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-21858 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P