Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule and, the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services To Amend the Date That Two Wireless Connections to Third Party Data Feeds Are Expected To Be Available, 62203-62205 [2016-21495]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78752; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2016–122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule and, the NYSE
Arca Equities Schedule of Fees and
Charges for Exchange Services To
Amend the Date That Two Wireless
Connections to Third Party Data Feeds
Are Expected To Be Available
September 1, 2016.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on August
24, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (the
‘‘Options Fee Schedule’’) and, through
its wholly owned subsidiary NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca Equities’’),
the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of
Fees and Charges for Exchange Services
(the ‘‘Equities Fee Schedule’’ and,
together with the Options Fee Schedule,
the ‘‘Fee Schedules’’) to amend the date
that two wireless connections to third
party data feeds are expected to be
available. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedules to amend the date that
two wireless connections to third party
data feeds are expected to be available.
The Exchange’s co-location 4 services
include the means for Users 5 to receive
market data feeds from third party
markets (‘‘Third Party Data’’) through a
wireless connection.6 The Exchange
recently amended the Fee Schedules to:
• Expand the existing wireless
connection to Bats Pitch BZX Gig
shaped data (‘‘BZX’’) to include Bats
Pitch BYX Gig shaped data (‘‘BYX’’);
and
• expand the existing wireless
connection to Bats EDGX Gig shaped
data (‘‘EDGX’’) to include Bats EDGA
Gig shaped data (‘‘EDGA’’).7
In its filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
making such amendment, the Exchange
stated that the proposed connectivity
was expected to be available no later
than September 1, 2016, and amended
the Fee Schedules to note that
connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data
feeds was expected to be available no
later than such date.8
4 The Exchange initially filed rule changes
relating to its co-location services with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) in 2010. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 63275 (November 8, 2010), 75 FR
70048 (November 16, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–
100). The Exchange operates a data center in
Mahwah, New Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from
which it provides co-location services to Users.
5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant
that requests to receive co-location services directly
from the Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 76010 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR
60197 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–82).
As specified in the Fee Schedules, a User that
incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location
service pursuant thereto would not be subject to colocation fees for the same co-location service
charged by the Exchange’s affiliates New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE LLC’’) and NYSE MKT
LLC (‘‘NYSE MKT’’). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 70173 (August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50459
(August 19, 2013) (SR–NYSEArca–2013–80).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76749
(December 23, 2015), 80 FR 81640 (December 30,
2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–99).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78377
(July 21, 2016), 81 FR 49327 (July 27, 2016) (SR–
NYSEArca–2016–99). The Commission designated
the proposed rule change as operative upon filing
with the Commission. Id. at 49331.
8 Id. at 49329.
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62203
The Exchange now proposes to amend
the Fee Schedules to update the
expected availability date to December
31, 2016. As previously stated, the
Exchange will announce the date that
such wireless connections will be made
available through a customer notice.
No other aspect of the wireless
connection to BZX and BYX or EDGX
and EDGA (together, the ‘‘Additional
Third Party Data’’) is being amended.
By way of background, as with all
wireless connections to Third Party
Data, the Exchange would utilize a
network vendor to provide a wireless
connection to the Additional Third
Party Data through wireless connections
from an Exchange access center to its
data center in Mahwah, New Jersey,
through a series of towers equipped
with wireless equipment. A User that
wished to receive Additional Third
Party Data would enter into a contract
with the relevant third party provider,
which would charge the User the
applicable market data fees. The
Exchange would charge the User fees for
the wireless connection.9
The Exchange proposes to offer the
wireless connections to provide Users
with an alternative means of
connectivity to Additional Third Party
Data. Currently, Users can receive such
Third Party Data from wireless networks
offered by third party vendors.10 Users
may also receive connections to
Additional Third Party Data through
other methods, including, for example,
from another User, through a
telecommunications provider, or over
the internet protocol (‘‘IP’’) network.11
As is the case with all Exchange colocation arrangements, (i) neither a User
nor any of the User’s customers would
be permitted to submit orders directly to
the Exchange unless such User or
customer is a member organization, a
Sponsored Participant or an agent
thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing
order entry services); (ii) use of the colocation services proposed herein would
be completely voluntary and available
to all Users on a non-discriminatory
basis; 12 and (iii) a User would only
9 A User only receives the Third Party Data for
which it enters into a contract with the third party
provider.
10 Currently, at least six third party vendors offer
Users wireless network connections using wireless
equipment installed on towers and buildings near
the data center.
11 The IP network is a local area network available
in the data center. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 74219 (February 6, 2015), 80 FR 7899
(February 12, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–03)
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change to include IP network
connections).
12 As is currently the case, Users that receive colocation services from the Exchange will not receive
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
Continued
08SEN1
62204
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
incur one charge for the particular colocation service described herein,
regardless of whether the User connects
only to the Exchange or to the Exchange
and one or both of its affiliates.13
The proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other issues
relating to co-location services and/or
related fees, and the Exchange is not
aware of any problems that Users would
have in complying with the proposed
change.
2. Statutory Basis
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) of the Act,14 in general, and
section 6(b)(4) of the Act,15 in
particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,16
in particular, because it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to,
and perfect the mechanisms of, a free
and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest and
because it is not designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because amending the
Fee Schedules to update the expected
availability date for connectivity to the
any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems that is separate from, or superior
to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems through the same order gateway,
regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the
data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do
not receive any market data or data service product
that is not available to all Users, although Users that
receive co-location services normally would expect
reduced latencies in sending orders to, and
receiving market data from, the Exchange.
13 See SR–NYSEArca–2013–80, supra note 5, at
50459. The Exchange’s affiliates have also
submitted substantially the same proposed rule
change to propose the changes described herein.
See SR–NYSE–2016–61 and SR–NYSEMKT–2016–
82.
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
BYX and EDGA data feeds to December
31, 2016, would add greater clarity to
the Fee Schedules regarding when such
connectivity will be available and allow
the Exchange more time to establish and
test connectivity to the BYX and EDGA
data feeds.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because
connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data
feeds would be available to all Users on
an equal basis (i.e., the connectivity to
such feeds will be made available to all
Users at the same time). Such
connectivity is completely voluntary.
Users that do not opt to utilize the
Exchange’s proposed wireless
connections would still be able to obtain
the Additional Third Party Data through
other methods, including, for example,
from wireless networks offered by third
party vendors, another User, through a
telecommunications provider, or over
the IP network.
For the reasons above, the proposed
changes do not unfairly discriminate
between or among market participants
that are otherwise capable of satisfying
any applicable co-location fees,
requirements, terms and conditions
established from time to time by the
Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposed fees are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,17 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because, in
addition to the proposed services being
completely voluntary, they are available
to all Users on an equal basis (i.e. the
same products and services are available
to all Users).
The Exchange believes that amending
the Fee Schedules to update the
expected availability date for
connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data
feeds to December 31, 2016, will not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because connectivity to the BYX and
EDGA data feeds would be available to
all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the
connectivity to such feeds will be made
available to all Users at the same time).
The proposed change would add greater
clarity to the Fee Schedules regarding
when such connectivity will be
available and allow the Exchange more
time to establish and test connectivity to
the BYX and EDGA data feeds. In
addition, Users that do not opt to utilize
the Exchange’s proposed wireless
connections would still be able to obtain
the Additional Third Party Data through
other methods, including, for example,
from wireless networks offered by third
party vendors, another User, through a
telecommunications provider, or over
the IP network.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which exchanges
offer co-location services as a means to
facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants
who believe that co-location enhances
the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for colocation services are constrained by the
active competition for the order flow of,
and other business from, such market
participants. If a particular exchange
charges excessive fees for co-location
services, affected market participants
will opt to terminate their co-location
arrangements with that exchange, and
adopt a possible range of alternative
strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate
location outside the exchange’s data
center (which could be a competing
exchange), or pursuing strategies less
dependent upon the lower exchange-toparticipant latency associated with colocation. Accordingly, the exchange
charging excessive fees would stand to
lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly colocated trading firms, which could have
additional follow-on effects on the
market share and revenue of the affected
exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) 18 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 19
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
18 15
17 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
19 17
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
08SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2016–122 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–NYSEArca–2016–122. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
20 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:34 Sep 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR–NYSEArca–
2016–122, and should be submitted on
or before September 29, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–21495 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78767; File No. SR–
BatsEDGX–2016–26]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of Amendment No. 1 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Amend
Exchange Rule 11.22 To Describe
Changes to System Functionality
Necessary To Implement the
Regulation NMS Plan To Implement a
Tick Size Pilot Program
September 2, 2016.
I. Introduction
On June 29, 2016, Bats EDGX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’
or ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
a proposed rule change to adopt
Exchange Rule 11.22(c) to describe
changes to System 3 functionality to
implement the Regulation NMS Plan to
Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program
(‘‘Plan’’ or ‘‘Pilot’’).4 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The term ‘‘System’’ is defined as the ‘‘electronic
communications and trading facility designated by
the Board of Directors of the Exchange through
which securities orders of Users are consolidated
for ranking, execution and, when applicable,
routing away.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(cc).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892
(May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015)
(‘‘Approval Order’’). Unless otherwise specified,
capitalized terms used in this rule filing are defined
as set forth in the Plan.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62205
the Federal Register on July 20, 2016.5
The Commission received one comment
letter from the Exchange in response to
the Notice.6 On September 1, 2016, the
Exchange filed an amendment to the
proposed rule change (‘‘Amendment No.
1’’), which supersedes and replaces the
proposal in its entirety.7
This order provides notice of filing of
Amendment No. 1 and approves the
proposal, as modified by Amendment
No. 1, on an accelerated basis.
II. Description of the Amended
Proposal
Proposed Exchange Rule 11.22(c)
would specify the order handling for the
following order types in Pilot Securities:
(i) Market Orders; (ii) orders with a
Market Peg instruction; (iii) MidPoint
Peg Orders; (iv) orders with a
Discretionary Range instruction; (v)
Market Maker Peg Orders; (vi)
Supplemental Peg Orders; and (vii)
orders subject to the Display-Price
Sliding process. As proposed, such
order handling would apply to all
orders entered into the System for Pilot
Securities (i.e., Test Group One, Test
Group Two, Test Group Three, and the
Control Group). Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to amend the last
sentence of Rule 11.22(a)(4) to specify
that the current permissible price
increments are set forth under Exchange
Rule 11.6(i), Minimum Price Variation.
The Exchange proposes in Exchange
Rule 11.22(c) specific procedures for
handling, executing, repricing and
displaying certain order types and order
type instructions. The provisions in
proposed Rule 11.22(c) would apply to
all Pilot Securities. Further, the
Exchange proposes that only the
provisions in Exchange Rules 11.22(a)
and (b) would be limited to the Pilot
Period.8
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78331 (July
14, 2016), 81 FR 47205 (‘‘Notice’’).
6 See Letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, from Eric Swanson, General Counsel,
Exchange, dated July 26, 2016 (‘‘Exchange Letter’’).
7 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange proposes to:
(1) Apply the changes in proposed Rule 11.22(c) to
all Pilot Securities; (2) clarify in Rule 11.22(c)(1)
that the increment for Market Orders and Rule
11.22(c)(5) that the increment for Market Maker Peg
Orders will be at ‘‘permissible’’ increments; (3) state
in Rule 11.22(c)(2) that orders with a Market Peg
instruction, Rule 11.22(c)(4) that orders with a
Discretionary Range, and Rule 11.22(c)(6) that
Supplemental Peg Orders will not be accepted in
Pilot Securities; (4) clarify in Rule 11.22(c)(3) that
MidPoint Peg Orders may not be alternatively
pegged to one minimum price variation inside the
same side of the NBBO as the order; (5) delete the
proposal to amend orders with a Non-Displayed
instruction; and (6) clarify how orders subject to
Display-Price Sliding will operate when they are
unexecutable at the locking price.
8 The Exchange proposes to clarify in the
introduction to Exchange Rule 11.22 that only the
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
Continued
08SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62203-62205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21495]
[[Page 62203]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-78752; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2016-122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule and, the NYSE Arca Equities Schedule of Fees
and Charges for Exchange Services To Amend the Date That Two Wireless
Connections to Third Party Data Feeds Are Expected To Be Available
September 1, 2016.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 24, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(the ``Options Fee Schedule'') and, through its wholly owned subsidiary
NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca Equities''), the NYSE Arca
Equities Schedule of Fees and Charges for Exchange Services (the
``Equities Fee Schedule'' and, together with the Options Fee Schedule,
the ``Fee Schedules'') to amend the date that two wireless connections
to third party data feeds are expected to be available. The proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedules to amend the date
that two wireless connections to third party data feeds are expected to
be available.
The Exchange's co-location \4\ services include the means for Users
\5\ to receive market data feeds from third party markets (``Third
Party Data'') through a wireless connection.\6\ The Exchange recently
amended the Fee Schedules to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its
co-location services with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
63275 (November 8, 2010), 75 FR 70048 (November 16, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-100). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah,
New Jersey (the ``data center'') from which it provides co-location
services to Users.
\5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76010 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60197
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-82). As specified in the Fee
Schedules, a User that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-
location service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-
location fees for the same co-location service charged by the
Exchange's affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE LLC'') and
NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70173 (August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50459 (August 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-
2013-80).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76749 (December 23,
2015), 80 FR 81640 (December 30, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-99).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expand the existing wireless connection to Bats Pitch BZX
Gig shaped data (``BZX'') to include Bats Pitch BYX Gig shaped data
(``BYX''); and
expand the existing wireless connection to Bats EDGX Gig
shaped data (``EDGX'') to include Bats EDGA Gig shaped data
(``EDGA'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78377 (July 21,
2016), 81 FR 49327 (July 27, 2016) (SR-NYSEArca-2016-99). The
Commission designated the proposed rule change as operative upon
filing with the Commission. Id. at 49331.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') making such amendment, the Exchange stated that the
proposed connectivity was expected to be available no later than
September 1, 2016, and amended the Fee Schedules to note that
connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data feeds was expected to be
available no later than such date.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id. at 49329.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to amend the Fee Schedules to update the
expected availability date to December 31, 2016. As previously stated,
the Exchange will announce the date that such wireless connections will
be made available through a customer notice.
No other aspect of the wireless connection to BZX and BYX or EDGX
and EDGA (together, the ``Additional Third Party Data'') is being
amended.
By way of background, as with all wireless connections to Third
Party Data, the Exchange would utilize a network vendor to provide a
wireless connection to the Additional Third Party Data through wireless
connections from an Exchange access center to its data center in
Mahwah, New Jersey, through a series of towers equipped with wireless
equipment. A User that wished to receive Additional Third Party Data
would enter into a contract with the relevant third party provider,
which would charge the User the applicable market data fees. The
Exchange would charge the User fees for the wireless connection.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A User only receives the Third Party Data for which it
enters into a contract with the third party provider.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to offer the wireless connections to provide
Users with an alternative means of connectivity to Additional Third
Party Data. Currently, Users can receive such Third Party Data from
wireless networks offered by third party vendors.\10\ Users may also
receive connections to Additional Third Party Data through other
methods, including, for example, from another User, through a
telecommunications provider, or over the internet protocol (``IP'')
network.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Currently, at least six third party vendors offer Users
wireless network connections using wireless equipment installed on
towers and buildings near the data center.
\11\ The IP network is a local area network available in the
data center. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74219 (February
6, 2015), 80 FR 7899 (February 12, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-03)
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule
change to include IP network connections).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i)
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of
the co-location services proposed herein would be completely voluntary
and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; \12\ and
(iii) a User would only
[[Page 62204]]
incur one charge for the particular co-location service described
herein, regardless of whether the User connects only to the Exchange or
to the Exchange and one or both of its affiliates.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from,
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
\13\ See SR-NYSEArca-2013-80, supra note 5, at 50459. The
Exchange's affiliates have also submitted substantially the same
proposed rule change to propose the changes described herein. See
SR-NYSE-2016-61 and SR-NYSEMKT-2016-82.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\14\ in general, and section 6(b)(4) of
the Act,\15\ in particular, because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and does not
unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because amending the Fee
Schedules to update the expected availability date for connectivity to
the BYX and EDGA data feeds to December 31, 2016, would add greater
clarity to the Fee Schedules regarding when such connectivity will be
available and allow the Exchange more time to establish and test
connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data feeds.
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data
feeds would be available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the
connectivity to such feeds will be made available to all Users at the
same time). Such connectivity is completely voluntary. Users that do
not opt to utilize the Exchange's proposed wireless connections would
still be able to obtain the Additional Third Party Data through other
methods, including, for example, from wireless networks offered by
third party vendors, another User, through a telecommunications
provider, or over the IP network.
For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\17\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because, in addition to the proposed services being
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e. the same products and services are available to all Users).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that amending the Fee Schedules to update the
expected availability date for connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data
feeds to December 31, 2016, will not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act because connectivity to the BYX and EDGA data feeds would be
available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the connectivity to
such feeds will be made available to all Users at the same time). The
proposed change would add greater clarity to the Fee Schedules
regarding when such connectivity will be available and allow the
Exchange more time to establish and test connectivity to the BYX and
EDGA data feeds. In addition, Users that do not opt to utilize the
Exchange's proposed wireless connections would still be able to obtain
the Additional Third Party Data through other methods, including, for
example, from wireless networks offered by third party vendors, another
User, through a telecommunications provider, or over the IP network.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the
trading and other market activities of those market participants who
believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by
the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from,
such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive
fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to
terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt
a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data
center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies
less dependent upon the lower exchange-to-participant latency
associated with co-location. Accordingly, the exchange charging
excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly co-located trading firms, which
could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue
of the affected exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \19\ thereunder, because it establishes a due,
[[Page 62205]]
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-NYSEArca-2016-122 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2016-122. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2016-122, and should
be submitted on or before September 29, 2016.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-21495 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P