Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 60672-60674 [2016-21211]

Download as PDF 60672 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices 7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and 7306.50.50.70. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 2.34 percent.3 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Final Results of Review The Department made no changes to the Preliminary Results. As a result of this review, we determine that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. for the period July 18, 2014, through August 31, 2015. Notification to Importers mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Assessment In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b) and the Final Modification,2 the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate all appropriate entries for Tension Steel without regard to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Tension Steel for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Tension Steel will be 0.00 percent, the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the 2 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Sep 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 26, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016–21212 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–580–867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–2015 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. The review covers five producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung) and Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), the two companies selected for individual examination, were made at less than normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective September 2, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482– 3931, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.1 The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// access.trade.gov and is available to all AGENCY: 3 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691, 53693 (September 10, 2014). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1 The full text of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2014–2015’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is issued concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice. E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Producer or exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Iljin ........................................ LSIS Co., Ltd ........................ 2.43 2.43 Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice.4 The Tolling of Deadline Department will announce the briefing As explained in the memorandum schedule to interested parties at a later from the Acting Assistant Secretary for date. Interested parties may submit case Enforcement and Compliance, the briefs on the deadline that the Department exercised its discretion to Department will announce.5 Rebuttal toll all administrative deadlines due to briefs, the content of which is limited to a closure of the Federal Government. All the issues raised in the case briefs, must deadlines in this segment of the be filed within five days from the proceeding have been extended by four deadline date for the submission of case business days. The revised deadline for briefs.6 the preliminary results of this review is Parties who submit case or rebuttal now August 26, 2016.2 briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A Methodology statement of the issue; (2) a brief The Department is conducting this summary of the argument; and (3) a review in accordance with section table of authorities.7 Case and rebuttal 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as briefs should be filed using ACCESS.8 amended (the Act). Constructed export Case and rebuttal briefs must be served price is calculated in accordance with on interested parties.9 Executive section 772 of the Act. Normal value is summaries should be limited to five calculated in accordance with section pages total, including footnotes. 773 of the Act. For a full description of Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), the methodology underlying our interested parties who wish to request a conclusions, see the Preliminary hearing must submit a written request to Decision Memorandum. the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the Preliminary Results of Review date of publication of this notice. We preliminarily determine that, for Requests should contain: (1) The party’s the period August 1, 2014, through July name, address and telephone number; 31, 2015, the following weighted(2) the number of participants; and (3) average dumping margins exist: 3 a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be Weightedlimited to those raised in the respective average case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for Producer or exporter dumping margin a hearing is made, the Department (percent) intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Hyosung Corporation ............ 1.76 Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd ............................. 3.09 Washington, DC 20230, at a date and Iljin Electric Co., Ltd ............. 2.43 time to be determined.10 Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of 2 See Memorandum to the File from Ron the hearing two days before the Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for scheduled date. Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of The Department intends to publish Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the the final results of this administrative Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ review, including the results of its dated January 27, 2016. 3 As we did not have a publicly-ranged total U.S. sales value for Hyosung for the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, to calculate a weighted-average dumping margin for the nonexamined companies (i.e., Iljin, Iljin Electric Co., Ltd, and LSIS Co., Ltd.), the rate applied to these companies is a simple average of the weightedaverage dumping margins calculated for Hyosung and Hyundai. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:25 Sep 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 4 See 19 CFR 351.224(b) 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1). 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). 7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). 8 See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 9 See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 10 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 5 See PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60673 analysis of issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.11 Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a perunit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 12 Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that were produced by Hyosung and Hyundai and for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, as established in the less-thanfair-value investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the 11 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h). 12 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 60674 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices Notification to Interested Parties transaction.13 For a full discussion of this matter, see Assessment Policy Notice.14 We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 26, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Cash Deposit Requirements Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Notification to Importers RIN 0648–XE855 This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.15 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting 13 See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). 14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). 15 See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Sep 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 1. Background 2. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information 4. Scope of the Order 5. Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 6. Product Comparisons 7. Date of Sale 8. Constructed Export Price 9. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliates D. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison 10. Currency Conversion 11. Recommendation Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501–2252; telephone: (907) 271–2809. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone: (907) 271–2809. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda Tuesday, September 20, 2016 Through Friday, September 23, 2016 The CPT will review updated stock assessments to determine overfishing status and catch specifications for PIBKC (Pribilof Islands Blue King Crab), BBRKC (Bristol Bay Red King Crab), PIRKC (Pribilof Island Red King Crab), SMBKC (St. Matthew Blue King Crab), Bering Sea Snow Crab, and Bering Sea Tanner Crab. The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at http://www.npfmc.org/. Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Shannon Gleason at (907) 271–2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date. [FR Doc. 2016–21211 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am] Dated: August 30, 2016. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [FR Doc. 2016–21188 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Crab Plan Team (CPT) will meet September 20 through September 23, 2016. DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 through Friday, September 23, 2016, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Alaska Fishery Science Center Traynor Room 2076, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA 98115. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XE856 North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Observer Advisory Committee (OAC) will meet in Seattle, WA. DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 19, 2016, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and on Tuesday, September 20, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in the Observer Training Room, Building 4 at the Alaska Fisheries Science Center, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60672-60674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-867]


Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power 
transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of 
review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. The review covers five 
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily 
determine that sales of subject merchandise by Hyosung Corporation 
(Hyosung) and Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), the two 
companies selected for individual examination, were made at less than 
normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are 
invited to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Effective September 2, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0195 or (202) 482-3931, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power 
transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal 
to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or 
unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the 
order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 
8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience 
and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of 
the order is dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in the 
memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled 
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of 
Korea; 2014-2015'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is 
issued concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on 
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all

[[Page 60673]]

parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department 
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of 
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as 
an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Tolling of Deadline

    As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary 
for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion 
to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal 
Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been 
extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the 
preliminary results of this review is now August 26, 2016.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum to the File from Ron Lorentzen, Acting 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, regarding 
``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government 
Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed 
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. 
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. 
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, 
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Preliminary Results of Review

    We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2014, 
through July 31, 2015, the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist: \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ As we did not have a publicly-ranged total U.S. sales value 
for Hyosung for the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, to 
calculate a weighted-average dumping margin for the non-examined 
companies (i.e., Iljin, Iljin Electric Co., Ltd, and LSIS Co., 
Ltd.), the rate applied to these companies is a simple average of 
the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Hyosung and 
Hyundai.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                  Producer or exporter                    dumping margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Corporation.....................................            1.76
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.......................            3.09
Iljin Electric Co., Ltd.................................            2.43
Iljin...................................................            2.43
LSIS Co., Ltd...........................................            2.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any 
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of 
review within five days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\4\ The Department will announce the briefing schedule to 
interested parties at a later date. Interested parties may submit case 
briefs on the deadline that the Department will announce.\5\ Rebuttal 
briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the 
case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline date for 
the submission of case briefs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b)
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 
requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\ 
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\8\ Case and 
rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.\9\ Executive 
summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
    \8\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of 
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's 
name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and 
(3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the 
hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and 
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department 
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and 
time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and 
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department intends to publish the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues 
raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after 
publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's 
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final 
results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered 
values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates 
for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to 
each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not 
reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit 
assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of 
dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that 
importer by the total sales quantity associated with those 
transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is 
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is 
zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP 
not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final 
Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average 
margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de 
minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of 
review that were produced by Hyosung and Hyundai and for which they did 
not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others 
rate of 22.00 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value 
investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the

[[Page 60674]]

transaction.\13\ For a full discussion of this matter, see Assessment 
Policy Notice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
    \14\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and 
Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in 
the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 
the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the 
investigation of this proceeding.\15\ These cash deposit requirements, 
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 26, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

1. Background
2. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information
4. Scope of the Order
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
    A. Determination of Comparison Method
    B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Constructed Export Price
9. Normal Value
    A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
    B. Level of Trade
    C. Sales to Affiliates
    D. Cost of Production
    1. Calculation of Cost of Production
    2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
    3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
    E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
    F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2016-21211 Filed 9-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P