Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 60672-60674 [2016-21211]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
60672
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and
7306.50.50.70.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description is
dispositive.
merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter
nor the manufacturer has its own rate,
the cash deposit rate will be 2.34
percent.3 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Final Results of Review
The Department made no changes to
the Preliminary Results. As a result of
this review, we determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of
0.00 percent exists for Tension Steel
Industries Co., Ltd. for the period July
18, 2014, through August 31, 2015.
Notification to Importers
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Assessment
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)
and the Final Modification,2 the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
all appropriate entries for Tension Steel
without regard to antidumping duties.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Tension
Steel for which it did not know that the
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate un-reviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. We intend to issue
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
final results of administrative review for
all shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Tension Steel will be
0.00 percent, the weighted-average
dumping margin established in the final
results of this administrative review; (2)
for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the less-than-fair-value
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the manufacturer of the
2 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 26, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–21212 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–867]
Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2014–2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on large power
transformers (LPTs) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea). The period of review
is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015.
The review covers five producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise.
We preliminarily determine that sales of
subject merchandise by Hyosung
Corporation (Hyosung) and Hyundai
Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai),
the two companies selected for
individual examination, were made at
less than normal value during the
period of review. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective September 2, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
3931, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order covers large
liquid dielectric power transformers
having a top power handling capacity
greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt
amperes (60 megavolt amperes),
whether assembled or unassembled,
complete or incomplete. The
merchandise subject to the order is
currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States at
subheadings 8504.23.0040,
8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This
tariff classification is provided for
convenience and Customs purposes;
however, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.1
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
AGENCY:
3 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From
India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic
of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country
Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691, 53693
(September 10, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 The full text of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large
Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea;
2014–2015’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is issued concurrent with and hereby
adopted by this notice.
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of topics discussed in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
attached as an Appendix to this notice.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Producer or exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Iljin ........................................
LSIS Co., Ltd ........................
2.43
2.43
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose to
parties to the proceeding any
calculations performed in connection
with these preliminary results of review
within five days after the date of
publication of this notice.4 The
Tolling of Deadline
Department will announce the briefing
As explained in the memorandum
schedule to interested parties at a later
from the Acting Assistant Secretary for
date. Interested parties may submit case
Enforcement and Compliance, the
briefs on the deadline that the
Department exercised its discretion to
Department will announce.5 Rebuttal
toll all administrative deadlines due to
briefs, the content of which is limited to
a closure of the Federal Government. All the issues raised in the case briefs, must
deadlines in this segment of the
be filed within five days from the
proceeding have been extended by four
deadline date for the submission of case
business days. The revised deadline for
briefs.6
the preliminary results of this review is
Parties who submit case or rebuttal
now August 26, 2016.2
briefs in this proceeding are requested
to submit with each argument: (1) A
Methodology
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
The Department is conducting this
summary of the argument; and (3) a
review in accordance with section
table of authorities.7 Case and rebuttal
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.8
amended (the Act). Constructed export
Case and rebuttal briefs must be served
price is calculated in accordance with
on interested parties.9 Executive
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
summaries should be limited to five
calculated in accordance with section
pages total, including footnotes.
773 of the Act. For a full description of
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
the methodology underlying our
interested parties who wish to request a
conclusions, see the Preliminary
hearing must submit a written request to
Decision Memorandum.
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance within 30 days of the
Preliminary Results of Review
date of publication of this notice.
We preliminarily determine that, for
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
the period August 1, 2014, through July
name, address and telephone number;
31, 2015, the following weighted(2) the number of participants; and (3)
average dumping margins exist: 3
a list of issues parties intend to discuss.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
Weightedlimited to those raised in the respective
average
case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for
Producer or exporter
dumping
margin
a hearing is made, the Department
(percent)
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S.
Hyosung Corporation ............
1.76 Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Hyundai Heavy Industries
Co., Ltd .............................
3.09 Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
Iljin Electric Co., Ltd .............
2.43 time to be determined.10 Parties should
confirm the date, time, and location of
2 See Memorandum to the File from Ron
the hearing two days before the
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
scheduled date.
Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of
The Department intends to publish
Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the
the final results of this administrative
Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,’’
review, including the results of its
dated January 27, 2016.
3 As we did not have a publicly-ranged total U.S.
sales value for Hyosung for the period August 1,
2014, through July 31, 2015, to calculate a
weighted-average dumping margin for the nonexamined companies (i.e., Iljin, Iljin Electric Co.,
Ltd, and LSIS Co., Ltd.), the rate applied to these
companies is a simple average of the weightedaverage dumping margins calculated for Hyosung
and Hyundai.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
4 See
19 CFR 351.224(b)
19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
8 See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
9 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
5 See
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60673
analysis of issues raised in any case or
rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days
after publication of these preliminary
results, unless extended.11
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, the Department
shall determine, and Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or
de minimis in the final results of this
review and the respondent reported
reliable entered values, we will
calculate importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rates for the merchandise
based on the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the examined
sales made during the period of review
to each importer to the total entered
value of those same sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the
respondent has not reported reliable
entered values, we will calculate a perunit assessment rate for each importer
by dividing the total amount of
dumping for the examined sales made
during the period of review to that
importer by the total sales quantity
associated with those transactions.
Where an importer-specific ad valorem
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties in accordance with
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis in the final
results of review, we will instruct CBP
not to assess duties on any of its entries
in accordance with the Final
Modification for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here
the weighted-average margin of
dumping for the exporter is determined
to be zero or de minimis, no
antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 12
Regarding entries of subject
merchandise during the period of
review that were produced by Hyosung
and Hyundai and for which they did not
know that the merchandise was
destined for the United States, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed
entries at the all-others rate of 22.00
percent, as established in the less-thanfair-value investigation of the order, if
there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
11 See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR
351.213(h).
12 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
60674
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
Notification to Interested Parties
transaction.13 For a full discussion of
this matter, see Assessment Policy
Notice.14
We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 26, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Notification to Importers
RIN 0648–XE855
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for Hyosung and
Hyundai and other companies listed
above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in
the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for previously reviewed or
investigated companies not listed above,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for
the most recently completed segment of
this proceeding in which they were
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a prior review,
or in the investigation but the producer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the merchandise;
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to
be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent,
the rate established in the investigation
of this proceeding.15 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
13 See Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
53177 (August 31, 2012).
14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
15 See Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
53177 (August 31, 2012).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:25 Sep 01, 2016
Jkt 238001
1. Background
2. Companies Not Selected for Individual
Examination
3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales
and Cost Information
4. Scope of the Order
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Constructed Export Price
9. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Sales to Affiliates
D. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation
Council address: North Pacific
Fishery Management Council, 605 W.
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK
99501–2252; telephone: (907) 271–2809.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone:
(907) 271–2809.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Agenda
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 Through
Friday, September 23, 2016
The CPT will review updated stock
assessments to determine overfishing
status and catch specifications for
PIBKC (Pribilof Islands Blue King Crab),
BBRKC (Bristol Bay Red King Crab),
PIRKC (Pribilof Island Red King Crab),
SMBKC (St. Matthew Blue King Crab),
Bering Sea Snow Crab, and Bering Sea
Tanner Crab. The Agenda is subject to
change, and the latest version will be
posted at https://www.npfmc.org/.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Shannon Gleason
at (907) 271–2809 at least 7 working
days prior to the meeting date.
[FR Doc. 2016–21211 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
Dated: August 30, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
[FR Doc. 2016–21188 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) Crab
Plan Team (CPT) will meet September
20 through September 23, 2016.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 through
Friday, September 23, 2016, from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Alaska Fishery Science Center
Traynor Room 2076, 7600 Sand Point
Way NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA
98115.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE856
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council; Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
Observer Advisory Committee (OAC)
will meet in Seattle, WA.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Monday, September 19, 2016, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. and on Tuesday,
September 20, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to
1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in the
Observer Training Room, Building 4 at
the Alaska Fisheries Science Center,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM
02SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60672-60674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21211]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-867]
Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power
transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of
review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. The review covers five
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily
determine that sales of subject merchandise by Hyosung Corporation
(Hyosung) and Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), the two
companies selected for individual examination, were made at less than
normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective September 2, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0195 or (202) 482-3931, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power
transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal
to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or
unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the
order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and
8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience
and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of
the order is dispositive.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in the
memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of
Korea; 2014-2015'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is
issued concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all
[[Page 60673]]
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department
of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of
topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as
an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum
and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Tolling of Deadline
As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary
for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion
to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal
Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been
extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the
preliminary results of this review is now August 26, 2016.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum to the File from Ron Lorentzen, Acting
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, regarding
``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government
Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions,
see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2014,
through July 31, 2015, the following weighted-average dumping margins
exist: \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As we did not have a publicly-ranged total U.S. sales value
for Hyosung for the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, to
calculate a weighted-average dumping margin for the non-examined
companies (i.e., Iljin, Iljin Electric Co., Ltd, and LSIS Co.,
Ltd.), the rate applied to these companies is a simple average of
the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Hyosung and
Hyundai.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer or exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyosung Corporation..................................... 1.76
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd....................... 3.09
Iljin Electric Co., Ltd................................. 2.43
Iljin................................................... 2.43
LSIS Co., Ltd........................................... 2.43
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of
review within five days after the date of publication of this
notice.\4\ The Department will announce the briefing schedule to
interested parties at a later date. Interested parties may submit case
briefs on the deadline that the Department will announce.\5\ Rebuttal
briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the
case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline date for
the submission of case briefs.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b)
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\8\ Case and
rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.\9\ Executive
summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2).
\8\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of
publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's
name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and
(3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the
hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department
intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and
time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to publish the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues
raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after
publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall
determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final
results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered
values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates
for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to
each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not
reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit
assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of
dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that
importer by the total sales quantity associated with those
transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is
zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR
351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP
not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final
Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average
margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de
minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14,
2012) (Final Modification for Reviews).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of
review that were produced by Hyosung and Hyundai and for which they did
not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others
rate of 22.00 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
[[Page 60674]]
transaction.\13\ For a full discussion of this matter, see Assessment
Policy Notice.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea:
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
\14\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003)
(Assessment Policy Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and
Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed
segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in
the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be
the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the
investigation of this proceeding.\15\ These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea:
Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 26, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum
1. Background
2. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination
3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information
4. Scope of the Order
5. Comparisons to Normal Value
A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
6. Product Comparisons
7. Date of Sale
8. Constructed Export Price
9. Normal Value
A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
B. Level of Trade
C. Sales to Affiliates
D. Cost of Production
1. Calculation of Cost of Production
2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices
3. Results of the Cost of Production Test
E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison
10. Currency Conversion
11. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2016-21211 Filed 9-1-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
