Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court Decision, 58474-58475 [2016-20428]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
58474
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Notices
For more information on the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework, please visit
www.privacyshield.gov.
Dated: August 17, 2016.
Praveen Dixit,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Industry and
Analysis, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2016–20421 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of
Court Decision Not in Harmony With
Amended Final Determination
Pursuant to Court Decision
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the United
States Court of International Trade
(‘‘CIT’’) sustained the redetermination
made by the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) pursuant to the CIT’s
remand of the final determination in the
antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) investigation
on drawn stainless steel sinks (‘‘sinks’’)
from the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’). Specifically, the CIT affirmed
the Department’s reliance on Thai data
to value stainless steel inputs and
revised calculation of selling, general,
administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses on
redetermination. Accordingly, the
Department is hereby notifying the
public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with the final
affirmative determination in the
underlying AD investigation and, as
there is a now a final and conclusive
AGENCY:
decision in this case, is amending the
final determination with respect to the
dumping margins determined for
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware
Industrial Company, Ltd. (‘‘Dongyuan’’),
Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. and
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co.,
Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Superte’’), as well as
all other companies that received a
separate rate.
DATES: Effective July 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve
Wang, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Subsequent to the publication of the
Final Determination 1 in the underlying
AD investigation of sinks from the PRC,
Dongyuan (a respondent in the
underlying investigation) and Elkay
Manufacturing Company (the petitioner
in the underlying investigation) filed
complaints with the CIT challenging
aspects of the methodology used to
determine the dumping margins in the
Final Determination.
On December 22, 2014, the CIT
granted the Department’s partial
voluntary remand request to reconsider
the use of Global Trade Atlas (‘‘GTA’’)
import data for Thailand to value coldrolled stainless steel coil, and also
directed the Department to reconsider
its methodology of accounting for SG&A
expenses in the normal value
calculations.2
Pursuant to the CIT’s instructions on
remand, the Department further
evaluated the information on the record
regarding the valuation of cold-rolled
stainless steel coil inputs and
determined to continue to use the GTA
import data for Thailand to value these
inputs.3 Furthermore, in compliance
with the remand directive, the
Department classified SG&A labor items
as SG&A expenses in each company’s
surrogate financial ratio calculation,
resulting in a change to the margins
calculated for each respondent.4 On July
14, 2016, the CIT affirmed the remand
redetermination.5
Timken Notice
In Timken Co. v. United States, 893
F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) held that, pursuant to
section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the
Department must publish a notice of a
court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
with a Department determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries
pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
The CIT’s July 14, 2016, judgment in
this case constitutes a final court
decision that is not in harmony with the
Department’s Final Determination. This
notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Determination
As a result of the Court’s final
decision with respect to this case, the
Department is amending the Final
Determination with respect to
Dongyuan, Superte, and all other
companies that received a separate rate
in the Final Determination. The revised
weighted-average dumping margins for
the July 1, 2011, through December 31,
2011, period of investigation are as
follows:
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Producer
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd./Zhongshan Superte
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. invoiced as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade
Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd .............
B&R Industries Limited ...............................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Exporter
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd ................................
50.11
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd ............
Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. and Jiamen XHHL
Stainless Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
36.59
43.35
1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the
People’s Republic of China: Investigation, Final
Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013), as
amended by Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11,
2013), (collectively, ‘‘Final Determination’’).
2 See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 13–00176, Slip Op. 14–150 (CIT 2014)
(‘‘Sinks Remand’’), at 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Aug 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
3 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand, dated April 22, 2015 (‘‘Final
Redetermination’’), at 6 and 24.
4 Id.
5 See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol.
Court No. 13–00176, Slip Op. 16–69 (CIT 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Notices
58475
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
Producer
Elkay (China) Kitchen Solutions, Co., Ltd ..................................
Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd ...........................................
Elkay (China) Kitchen Solutions, Co., Ltd .................................
Jiangmen Liantai Kitchen Equipment Co.; Jiangmen Xinhe
Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd .................
Guangdong YingAo Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd.; Franke (China)
Kitchen System Co., Ltd.
Zhongshan Xintian Hardware Co., Ltd ......................................
Jiangmen Jin Ke Ying Stainless Steel Wares Co., Ltd .............
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ...........................
Hangzhou Heng’s Industries Co., Ltd ........................................
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd ................................
Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd ...................................
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd ..............................
Jiangmen Ouert Kitchen Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd.;
Jiangmen XHHL Stainless Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Jiangxi Offidun Industry Co. Ltd ................................................
Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd .....................................
Primy Cooperation Limited ........................................................
Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd ...........................................
Bonke Kitchen & Sanitary Industrial Co., Ltd ............................
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
Zhongshan Xintian Hardware Co., Ltd ......................................
Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd ..............
43.35
43.35
Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ..................
Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd ...........................................................
Grand Hill Work Company ..........................................................
Guangdong G-Top Import and Export Co., Ltd ..........................
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ............................
Hangzhou Heng’s Industries Co., Ltd .........................................
J&C Industries Enterprise Limited ..............................................
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd ........................................
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd ...............................
Jiangmen Pioneer Import & Export Co., Ltd ..............................
Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Industry Co., Ltd ...........................
Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ......................................
Primy Cooperation Limited .........................................................
Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.6 .........................................
Shunde Foodstuffs Import & Export Company Limited of
Guangdong.
Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation ......
Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd ...............
Cash Deposit Requirements
Since the Final Determination, the
Department has established a new cash
deposit rate for Dongyuan, Superte,
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils
Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan Newecan
Enterprise Development Corporation,
and further determined that Feidong
Import & Export Co., Ltd. is no longer
eligible for a separate rate and is
considered part of the PRC-wide entity.7
Therefore, this amended final
determination does not change the laterestablished cash deposit rates for those
exporters. All other companies
identified in the table above do not have
a superseding cash deposit rate and,
therefore, the Department will issue
revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection,
adjusting the cash deposit rate for these
separate-rate companies to 43.35
percent, effective July 24, 2016.
Notification to Interested Parties
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
6 Though Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.
was not granted a separate rate at the time of the
Final Determination, it was later determined to be
eligible for a separate in the underlying
investigation in a prior amended final
determination and Timken notice. See Drawn
Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
With Final Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation, 79 FR 63079 (October 22, 2014).
7 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2014, 80 FR 69644 (November 10, 2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Aug 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
43.35
On July
25, 2016, the Department of Commerce
(the Department) published the
Antidumping Duty Orders on certain
corrosion-resistant steel products from
[FR Doc. 2016–20428 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]
India, Italy, the People’s Republic of
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
China (PRC), the Republic of Korea
(Korea), and Taiwan.1 The Antidumping
Duty Orders contained unintended
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
errors regarding (1) the estimated
International Trade Administration
weighted-average dumping margins for
[A–533–863, A–475–832, A–570–026, A–580– the PRC and (2) the date that the
extended period of provisional
878, A–583–856]
measures expired.
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping
Products From India, Italy, the
Margins for PRC
People’s Republic of China, the
As stated in the Initiation Notice,2 the
Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Notice
Department calculates combination
of Correction to the Antidumping Duty
rates for respondents that are eligible for
Orders
a separate rate in non-market economy
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
antidumping duty investigations. Policy
International Trade Administration,
Bulletin 05.1 describes this practice.3
Department of Commerce.
While we correctly listed the PRC rates
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia as combination rates in the PRC Final
Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit at (202)
1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
482–1394 and (202) 482–4031,
from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
respectively (Italy), Kabir Archuletta at
the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final
(202) 482–2593 (India); Elfi Blum or
Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India
Lingjun Wang (Korea) at (202) 482–0197 and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
48390 (July 25, 2016) (Antidumping Duty Orders).
or (202) 482–2316, respectively; Nancy
2 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
Decker or Andrew Huston at (202) 482– From Italy, India, the People’s Republic of China,
0196 or (202) 482–4261, respectively
the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 37228
(PRC); or Shanah Lee or Paul Stolz at
(June 30, 2015) (Initiation Notice).
(202) 482–6386 and (202) 482–4474,
3 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
respectively (Taiwan), AD/CVD
Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
Operations, Enforcement and
Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
Compliance, International Trade
Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
Administration, U.S. Department of
Bulletin 05.1), available on the Department’s Web
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution site at https://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05–
1.pdf.
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM
25AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58474-58475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-983]
Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China:
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final
Determination Pursuant to Court Decision
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the United States Court of International
Trade (``CIT'') sustained the redetermination made by the Department of
Commerce (``Department'') pursuant to the CIT's remand of the final
determination in the antidumping duty (``AD'') investigation on drawn
stainless steel sinks (``sinks'') from the People's Republic of China
(``PRC''). Specifically, the CIT affirmed the Department's reliance on
Thai data to value stainless steel inputs and revised calculation of
selling, general, administrative (``SG&A'') expenses on
redetermination. Accordingly, the Department is hereby notifying the
public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the
final affirmative determination in the underlying AD investigation and,
as there is a now a final and conclusive decision in this case, is
amending the final determination with respect to the dumping margins
determined for Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Company, Ltd.
(``Dongyuan''), Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Superte
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Superte''), as well as all other
companies that received a separate rate.
DATES: Effective July 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Wang, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-6231.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Subsequent to the publication of the Final Determination \1\ in the
underlying AD investigation of sinks from the PRC, Dongyuan (a
respondent in the underlying investigation) and Elkay Manufacturing
Company (the petitioner in the underlying investigation) filed
complaints with the CIT challenging aspects of the methodology used to
determine the dumping margins in the Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic
of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February
26, 2013), as amended by Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April
11, 2013), (collectively, ``Final Determination'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On December 22, 2014, the CIT granted the Department's partial
voluntary remand request to reconsider the use of Global Trade Atlas
(``GTA'') import data for Thailand to value cold-rolled stainless steel
coil, and also directed the Department to reconsider its methodology of
accounting for SG&A expenses in the normal value calculations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-
00176, Slip Op. 14-150 (CIT 2014) (``Sinks Remand''), at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the CIT's instructions on remand, the Department
further evaluated the information on the record regarding the valuation
of cold-rolled stainless steel coil inputs and determined to continue
to use the GTA import data for Thailand to value these inputs.\3\
Furthermore, in compliance with the remand directive, the Department
classified SG&A labor items as SG&A expenses in each company's
surrogate financial ratio calculation, resulting in a change to the
margins calculated for each respondent.\4\ On July 14, 2016, the CIT
affirmed the remand redetermination.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand, dated April 22, 2015 (``Final Redetermination''), at 6 and
24.
\4\ Id.
\5\ See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-
00176, Slip Op. 16-69 (CIT 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
(``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''),
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'')
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (``the Act''), the Department must publish a notice of a court
decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and
must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court
decision. The CIT's July 14, 2016, judgment in this case constitutes a
final court decision that is not in harmony with the Department's Final
Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Determination
As a result of the Court's final decision with respect to this
case, the Department is amending the Final Determination with respect
to Dongyuan, Superte, and all other companies that received a separate
rate in the Final Determination. The revised weighted-average dumping
margins for the July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, period of
investigation are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Exporter Producer average margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Zhongshan Superte 50.11
Co., Ltd./Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. invoiced
as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co.,
Ltd.
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Guangdong Dongyuan 36.59
Industrial Co., Ltd. Kitchenware Industrial
Co., Ltd.
B&R Industries Limited......... Xinhe Stainless Steel 43.35
Products Co., Ltd. and
Jiamen XHHL Stainless
Steel Manufacturing
Co., Ltd.
[[Page 58475]]
Elkay (China) Kitchen Elkay (China) Kitchen 43.35
Solutions, Co., Ltd. Solutions, Co., Ltd.
Feidong Import and Export Co., Jiangmen Liantai 43.35
Ltd. Kitchen Equipment Co.;
Jiangmen Xinhe
Stainless Steel
Product Co., Ltd.
Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Foshan Shunde MingHao 43.35
Utensils Co., Ltd. Kitchen Utensils Co.,
Ltd.
Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd....... Guangdong YingAo 43.35
Kitchen Utensils Co.,
Ltd.; Franke (China)
Kitchen System Co.,
Ltd.
Grand Hill Work Company........ Zhongshan Xintian 43.35
Hardware Co., Ltd.
Guangdong G-Top Import and Jiangmen Jin Ke Ying 43.35
Export Co., Ltd. Stainless Steel Wares
Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Guangdong Yingao 43.35
Utensils Co., Ltd. Kitchen Utensils Co.,
Ltd.
Hangzhou Heng's Industries Co., Hangzhou Heng's 43.35
Ltd. Industries Co., Ltd.
J&C Industries Enterprise Zhongshan Superte 43.35
Limited. Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Xinhe Stainless Steel 43.35
Ltd. Products Co., Ltd.
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Jiangmen New Star Hi- 43.35
Enterprise Ltd. Tech Enterprise Ltd.
Jiangmen Pioneer Import & Jiangmen Ouert Kitchen 43.35
Export Co., Ltd. Appliance
Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd.; Jiangmen XHHL
Stainless Steel
Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Jiangxi Offidun 43.35
Industry Co., Ltd. Industry Co. Ltd.
Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Ningbo Oulin Kitchen 43.35
Co., Ltd. Utensils Co., Ltd.
Primy Cooperation Limited...... Primy Cooperation 43.35
Limited.
Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Shenzhen Kehuaxing 43.35
Ltd.\6\. Industrial Ltd.
Shunde Foodstuffs Import & Bonke Kitchen & 43.35
Export Company Limited of Sanitary Industrial
Guangdong. Co., Ltd.
Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Zhongshan Xintian 43.35
Development Corporation. Hardware Co., Ltd.
Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & 43.35
Bathroom Products Co., Ltd. Bathroom Products Co.,
Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
Since the Final Determination, the Department has established a new
cash deposit rate for Dongyuan, Superte, Guangdong Yingao Kitchen
Utensils Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development
Corporation, and further determined that Feidong Import & Export Co.,
Ltd. is no longer eligible for a separate rate and is considered part
of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ Therefore, this amended final determination
does not change the later-established cash deposit rates for those
exporters. All other companies identified in the table above do not
have a superseding cash deposit rate and, therefore, the Department
will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, adjusting the cash deposit rate for these separate-rate
companies to 43.35 percent, effective July 24, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Though Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd. was not granted a
separate rate at the time of the Final Determination, it was later
determined to be eligible for a separate in the underlying
investigation in a prior amended final determination and Timken
notice. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 63079
(October 22, 2014).
\7\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic
of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012-2014, 80 FR 69644 (November 10, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-20428 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
