Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 57626-57627 [2016-20049]

Download as PDF 57626 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Notices APPENDIX [46 TAA Petitions instituted between 7/11/16 and 7/22/16] Subject firm (petitioners) Location Hewlett Packard Enterprise (State/One-Stop) ......................................... Atlas Copco Hurricane LLC (Workers) ..................................................... CTS Corporation (Company) ................................................................... Thermo Fisher Scientific (State/One-Stop) .............................................. DSI Underground Systems (Workers) ...................................................... Perceptive (Parexel) Informatics (State/One-Stop) .................................. Epicor Software Corporation (Workers) ................................................... Atos IT Solutions and Services (State/One-Stop) .................................... GateHouse Media (Lawyers Weekly LLC/Virginia Publishing), Customer Service (State/One-Stop). International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) (State/One-Stop) ... Plano, TX ........................................ Franklin, IN ...................................... Elkhart, IN ....................................... Chelmsford, MA .............................. Martinsburg, WV ............................. Billerica, MA .................................... Westminster, CO ............................. Redmond, WA ................................. Boston, MA ..................................... 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/12/16 07/12/16 07/13/16 07/13/16 07/13/16 07/08/16 07/11/16 07/08/16 06/29/16 07/11/16 07/11/16 07/12/16 07/12/16 07/11/16 Schaumburg and the Atlanta locations, IL. Williamstown, WV ........................... Dundee, MI ..................................... East Aurora, NY .............................. 07/14/16 07/13/16 07/15/16 07/15/16 07/15/16 07/08/16 07/13/16 07/13/16 Erie, PA ........................................... Tulsa, OK ........................................ Tysons, VA ...................................... Houston, TX .................................... Mullins, SC ...................................... Shelbyville, TN ................................ Plymouth, IN ................................... Naperville, IL ................................... El Segundo, CA .............................. Clackamas, OR ............................... Portland, OR ................................... Columbus, OH ................................ New Province, NJ ........................... Fairview, PA .................................... Kansas City, MO ............................. 07/15/16 07/15/16 07/15/16 07/15/16 07/18/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/14/16 07/14/16 07/14/16 07/14/16 07/15/16 07/18/16 07/19/16 07/18/16 07/18/16 07/18/16 07/18/16 07/18/16 07/18/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 Brooklyn, NY ................................... New York, NY ................................. Osceola, AR .................................... Forest Grove, OR ........................... Holloman Air Force Base, NM ........ New Berlin, WI ................................ Asheboro, NC ................................. Dunkirk, NY ..................................... Salisbury, NC .................................. Huntington, TN ................................ Canby, OR ...................................... Colorado Springs, CO ..................... 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/19/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/20/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 Canby, OR ...................................... Portland, OR ................................... Milpitas, CA ..................................... Denver, CO ..................................... Portland, OR ................................... Irving, TX ......................................... 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/22/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/21/16 07/22/16 TA–W 92003 92004 92005 92006 92007 92008 92009 92010 92011 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 92012 .................... 92013 .................... 92014 .................... 92015 .................... 92016 92017 92018 92019 92020 92021 92022 92023 92024 92025 92026 92027 92028 92029 92030 .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... .................... 92031 .................... 92032 .................... 92033 .................... 92034 .................... 92035 .................... 92036 .................... 92037 .................... 92038 .................... 92039A ................. 92039 .................... 92040 .................... 92041 .................... 92042 .................... 92043 .................... 92043A ................. 92044 .................... 92045 .................... 92046 .................... Fenton Art Glass Company (Workers) ..................................................... Chrysler Dundee Engine Plant (Workers) ................................................ Mattel, Inc., Mattel Global Shared Service Solutions (MGSSS) (State/ One-Stop). Erie Bolt Company (EBC) (Union) ........................................................... D & L Oil Tool (State/One-Stop) .............................................................. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) (State/One-Stop) ....................... Halliburton (Wireline and Perforating) (State/One-Stop) .......................... American Light Bulb Manufacturing Inc. (State/One-Stop) ...................... Sanford LP (Company) ............................................................................ Indiana Tool & Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Company) ....................... Alcatel-Lucent Nokia (State/One-Stop) .................................................... TEKsystems (State/One-Stop) ................................................................. Conmet/Consolidated Metco Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................................. Daimler Trucks North America, LLC (State/One-Stop) ............................ McDonald’s Corporation (State/One-Stop) ............................................... Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise (ALE) (State/One-Stop) ................................... Control Devices, LLC formerly Flexi-Hinge Valve Co., Inc. (Workers) .... Blue Scope Buildings of North America/Blue Scope Steel (State/OneStop). JP Morgan Chase, Hedge Fund Service Division (State/One-Stop) ....... Ralph Lauren (State/One-Stop) ............................................................... Viskase Companies, Inc. (Company) ....................................................... TTM/Viasystems Technologies Corp., LLC (State/One-Stop) ................. Federal Republic of Germany (Company) ............................................... ITW Ark-Les (Company) .......................................................................... Specialty/Euclid Vidaro (Workers) ............................................................ Berry Plastics (Company) ........................................................................ Norandal USA, Inc. (Company) ............................................................... Norandal USA, Inc. (Company) ................................................................ Willamette Egg Farms (State/One-Stop) .................................................. Verizon Communications/Enterprise Solutions/Verizon Business Order Pro (State/One-Stop). Shimadzu USA Manufacturing Inc. (State/One-Stop) .............................. SeaChange International, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ..................................... SeaChange International, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ..................................... Northwest Pipe Company (Company) ...................................................... CH2M (State/One-Stop) ........................................................................... Blueprint Consulting Services (State/One-Stop) ...................................... [FR Doc. 2016–20047 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES [TA–W–91,218] Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated January 29, 2016, the state workforce office requested administrative reconsideration of the negative VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Aug 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota. The determination was issued on January 12, 2016. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution Date of petition (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that imports did not increase, and that the workers’ firm does not import wholesale or repair services. Further, the firm did not shift the supply of wholesale or repair services or like or directly competitive services to a foreign country or acquire wholesale or repair services or like or directly competitive services from a foreign country. Further, the firm is not a Supplier to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Notices services supplied by the workers firm were not used in the production of an article, iron ore. The services supplied were used within the tools/equipment used to mine for ore. Finally, the firm does not act as a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The workers’ firm was not engaged in value-added finishing processes used in the production of an article or supply of a service. The request for reconsideration states that this determination is erroneous and that the subject firm should be considered to be a downstream supplier because without their products steel cannot be manufactured. The request also included additional information relating to this statement. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of July, 2016. Jessica R. Webster, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2016–20049 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of July 11, 2016 through July 22, 2016. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:56 Aug 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57627 a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(e) of the Act must be met. (1) the workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM 23AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57626-57627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-91,218]


Mesabi Radial Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, 
Minnesota; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application 
for Reconsideration

    By application dated January 29, 2016, the state workforce office 
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination 
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for worker adjustment 
assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Mesabi Radial 
Tire Company, 1801 5th Avenue East, Hibbing, Minnesota. The 
determination was issued on January 12, 2016.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that imports did not increase, and that the 
workers' firm does not import wholesale or repair services. Further, 
the firm did not shift the supply of wholesale or repair services or 
like or directly competitive services to a foreign country or acquire 
wholesale or repair services or like or directly competitive services 
from a foreign country. Further, the firm is not a Supplier to a firm 
that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The

[[Page 57627]]

services supplied by the workers firm were not used in the production 
of an article, iron ore. The services supplied were used within the 
tools/equipment used to mine for ore. Finally, the firm does not act as 
a Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who 
received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the 
Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a). The workers' firm was not engaged in value-
added finishing processes used in the production of an article or 
supply of a service.
    The request for reconsideration states that this determination is 
erroneous and that the subject firm should be considered to be a 
downstream supplier because without their products steel cannot be 
manufactured. The request also included additional information relating 
to this statement.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of July, 2016.
Jessica R. Webster,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016-20049 Filed 8-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P