Exal Corporation, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Alliance Industrial Solutions and Ryan Alternative Staffing, Youngstown, Ohio; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 57625 [2016-20046]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 163 / Tuesday, August 23, 2016 / Notices
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States and State of Ohio
v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et
al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09090. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit comments:
Send them to:
By e-mail ...................
pubcommentees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney
General, U.S.
DOJ–ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, D.C.
20044–7611.
By mail ......................
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ–
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $42.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury for the Consent Decree.
For a paper copy without the exhibits
and signature pages, the cost is $13.25.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–20076 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
[TA–W–91,248]
Exal Corporation, Including On-Site
Leased Workers from Alliance
Industrial Solutions and Ryan
Alternative Staffing, Youngstown,
Ohio; Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated June 22, 2016,
the state workforce office requested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Aug 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
administrative reconsideration of the
negative determination regarding
workers’ eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance applicable to
workers and former workers of Exal
Corporation, including on-site leased
workers from Alliance Industrial
Solutions and Ryan Alternative Staffing,
Youngstown, Ohio. The determination
was issued on May 26, 2016 and the
Notice of Determination was published
in the Federal Register on June 28, 2016
(81 FR 42000).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that there was no increase in
imports by the workers’ firm or its
customers, nor was there a foreign shift
or acquisition by the workers’ firm or its
customers. In addition, neither the
workers’ firm nor its customers reported
imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles for which the
article produced by the workers’ firm
were directly incorporated.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that the subject firm and
customer continues to import from a
foreign location like or directly
competitive articles while decreasing
articles produced within the United
States. The request for reconsideration
included new facts.
The Department of Labor has carefully
reviewed the request for reconsideration
and the existing record, and has
determined that the Department will
conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57625
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of
July, 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016–20046 Filed 8–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
no later than September 2, 2016.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than September 2, 2016.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of
August 2016.
Jessica R. Webster,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 163 (Tuesday, August 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 57625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20046]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-91,248]
Exal Corporation, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Alliance
Industrial Solutions and Ryan Alternative Staffing, Youngstown, Ohio;
Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated June 22, 2016, the state workforce office
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Exal
Corporation, including on-site leased workers from Alliance Industrial
Solutions and Ryan Alternative Staffing, Youngstown, Ohio. The
determination was issued on May 26, 2016 and the Notice of
Determination was published in the Federal Register on June 28, 2016
(81 FR 42000).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination
based on the findings that there was no increase in imports by the
workers' firm or its customers, nor was there a foreign shift or
acquisition by the workers' firm or its customers. In addition, neither
the workers' firm nor its customers reported imports of articles like
or directly competitive with articles for which the article produced by
the workers' firm were directly incorporated.
The request for reconsideration asserts that the subject firm and
customer continues to import from a foreign location like or directly
competitive articles while decreasing articles produced within the
United States. The request for reconsideration included new facts.
The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S.
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore,
granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July, 2016.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2016-20046 Filed 8-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
